Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Welcome to the Skeptics
0:06
Guide to Emergency Medicine.
0:09
Meet them, Greet them,
0:11
treat them, and street
0:14
them. Today's date is
0:16
January 7th 2025 and
0:19
I'm your skeptical host
0:21
Ken Milne. The title of
0:24
today's podcast is This
0:26
is Our Fight Song.
0:28
Feminim 2.0. And we have
0:31
not one. Not two. But
0:33
three. guest skeptics for this
0:35
super S gem extra. So the first
0:37
guest skeptic is Dr. Dara
0:40
Cass. She is an emergency
0:42
medicine physician, public health leader
0:44
and advocate passionate about equity
0:46
and health care reform. She
0:48
founded Feminem, promoting gender
0:51
equity in emergency medicine and
0:53
champions organ donation reform after
0:56
donating part of her own
0:58
liver to her youngest son. Dr.
1:00
Cass is dedicated to expanding
1:03
reproductive health care access and
1:05
educating the public on health
1:07
care policy. A mother of
1:09
three, she combines her commitment
1:11
to medicine, advocacy, and equity
1:13
to create meaningful change. Welcome
1:16
back to the SGM, Dara. Thank
1:18
you for having me back, Dr. Milne.
1:20
Oh, oh, come on, Dara, it's Ken, and I
1:22
love having you on. I've had you on,
1:24
I think a couple of times. I mean,
1:26
it goes back like... to some of the
1:29
early days, it was 2017, when I came
1:31
out and I said, hey, there's this new
1:33
group coming up, feminine, and I looked into
1:35
it, and by December I'm like, you know
1:37
what, 2017 is the year of feminine. You
1:40
did declare that, and I think that we
1:42
did have a very good year that year.
1:44
I can't say it was because of you,
1:46
but I can certainly say they both happened
1:48
at the same. I don't want to over
1:50
interpret the data, but I would say that
1:53
we did have a good year in 2017.
1:55
Correlation is not causation right but
1:57
you were kind enough to invite me
2:00
to present at your 2019 female idea
2:02
exchange conference in New York City. So
2:04
that was 2019, Dr. Jen Gunter was
2:06
there, she was launching a book, my
2:08
wife Barb came down and it was
2:11
just an amazing trip to New York
2:13
City and to be in that room
2:15
with about five, no, I think it
2:17
was like 800 women and I've done
2:19
a lot of speaking, I must admit.
2:21
I was very nervous getting up on
2:23
that stage presenting in front of those
2:26
women talking about the evidence behind gender
2:28
inequity in the House of Medicine. It
2:30
was great to have you. I will
2:32
say that the feminine conferences and we'll
2:34
talk a little bit about them I
2:36
think as we go on were magic.
2:39
I still hold that they were one
2:41
of the most amazing things we did
2:43
and we hadn't expected to do them
2:45
year over year. Lots of reasons we'll
2:47
talk about why they stopped, but having
2:49
you there was very special. The feeling
2:52
of running those conferences and seeing the
2:54
interpersonal like dynamics and the speakers and
2:56
the participants and just the energy in
2:58
the room is something that I think
3:00
I still carry with me when I
3:02
have challenging days because it was just
3:05
magic as the only word we ever
3:07
use. It's always funny what you remember
3:09
from these things. I remember three things.
3:11
One, we arrived and Barb lost her
3:13
luggage. I shouldn't say Barb lost her
3:15
luggage, but the airline lost her luggage.
3:18
So we went on a shopping trip
3:20
through New York City, which was fabulous
3:22
for her. And then when I came
3:24
to present, I was really nervous, like
3:26
I said, and my bladder was like,
3:28
oh my God, I got a pee,
3:31
I got a pee, I got a
3:33
pee, I got a pee. And they
3:35
had changed all the bathrooms on that.
3:37
had to run down, oh my god
3:39
I'm on in five minutes, and I
3:41
had to run downstairs and use another
3:43
bathroom because all the bathrooms are changed.
3:46
So that was the second thing I
3:48
remember, again, weird. And the third thing
3:50
is we had all these capes, these
3:52
purple capes that said fix 19, and
3:54
all these presenters wearing these capes, looking
3:56
like superheroes of medicine. That was the
3:59
image that was left with me. I
4:01
loved it. So I will just say one
4:03
thing. The first conference we had, which
4:05
was fixed 17, we actually took all
4:07
the bathrooms in the venue and made
4:09
them gender neutral and was interesting because
4:11
we had about a dozen men joined
4:13
that first conference and there was no
4:16
man's bathroom. It was just gender neutral
4:18
bathrooms for everybody. And I remember that
4:20
that first day, one of the guys
4:22
that was at the conference and these
4:24
were all champions of gender equity, you
4:26
know, had thought about things from a
4:28
very equitable perspective. standing in line for
4:31
the bathroom behind 20 women because every
4:33
bathroom is gender neutral was one of
4:35
the first introductions into what it's like
4:37
to walk in the shoes of somebody
4:40
that you don't think about you know
4:42
having different experiences. So gender neutral bathrooms
4:44
are great at every conference. I'd advocate
4:46
for them across the board for lots
4:49
of reasons, but I would say turning
4:51
the bathrooms into gender neutral conferences at
4:53
the first conference was a really good
4:55
lesson in gender equity that I had
4:58
not anticipated teaching a few good men.
5:00
So much to learn. All right and
5:02
our next guest skeptic is Dr. Esther
5:04
Chu Now she just goes by a
5:06
single name because she is a rock
5:09
star We're just going to call her
5:11
Chu and I'm waiting for her evolution
5:13
to be like Prince. She'll be the
5:15
the the emergency physician formerly known as
5:18
Chu and she'll just be represented by
5:20
a symbol She is an emergency physician
5:22
and professor at the Oregon Health and
5:24
Science University. She's a popular science communicator
5:27
who has used social media to talk
5:29
about racism and Sexism in Health Care.
5:31
Welcome back to the S gem, Esther
5:34
Chu. Have I also been on the S
5:36
gem? Yes, you've been on twice.
5:38
I had you on once in 2019,
5:40
and the show was, she works hard
5:42
for the money. And the other one
5:45
was, an S gem extra about being
5:47
stronger together, and that was in 2017.
5:49
That sounds right. I think that's
5:51
when we did together. Well, it's
5:54
good to be back. And so our
5:56
third guest skeptic on this S
5:58
gem extra is Dr. Jenny Beck-Esmay.
6:00
She is an associate professor of
6:02
emergency medicine and assistant residency director
6:05
at Mount Sinai, Morningside, and Mount
6:07
Sinai West in New York City.
6:09
And she is passionate about emergency
6:11
medicine education and gender equity in
6:13
medicine and has proud to have
6:15
contributed content to numerous foam ed
6:18
resources like feminine, rebel EM and
6:20
EM docs. Welcome to the ESGEM
6:22
Jenny. Thank you. I'm so excited
6:24
to be here. Well, this is
6:26
your first time on the SJEM,
6:28
and I'm surprised that I'm saying
6:30
that, because we'll need to make
6:33
sure it's not your last time
6:35
on the SJEM. I'm a little
6:37
shocked as well. You and I
6:39
go way back now to some
6:41
of my earliest roots in the
6:43
FOMAD universe, and I'm surprised this
6:46
is my first time visiting you
6:48
in Canada. Well, we are going
6:50
to rectify that today, and moving
6:52
forward. Excellent! This is an SGM
6:54
Extra where we bring you special
6:56
episodes that highlight important topics in
6:58
emergency medicine. Today, we've invited these
7:01
three amazing people to discuss the
7:03
relaunch of females in emergency medicine
7:05
or feminine 2.0 initiative. And yeah,
7:07
it was it was a long
7:09
time ago that we spoke and
7:11
feminems was making waves about empowering
7:14
women emergency medicine and fostering this
7:16
conversation about gender equity. So let's
7:18
do a little time travel forward.
7:20
Do do, do, do, do, do,
7:22
do. Here we are in 2025
7:24
and feminine is back. better than
7:26
ever with a renewed energy and
7:29
a clear mission. So before we
7:31
dive into relaunching Feminim 2.0, what
7:33
the heck of you three been
7:35
up to over the last few
7:37
years because I'm sure there's some
7:39
interesting backstory. We'll start with you,
7:42
Dara. So what have I been
7:44
doing? Okay, well, the last time
7:46
we met in 2019 at the
7:48
conference, there was a virus that
7:50
circulated around the United States and
7:52
I hear it went through the
7:54
rest of the world as well.
7:57
I don't know. C
7:59
time before COVID. Seriously.
8:03
So obviously, all of
8:05
us got through the COVID experience
8:07
and in many different ways. And thank
8:09
God, most of us survived, although we do
8:11
need to remember that not everybody did. But
8:13
at the end of the day,
8:15
we all kind of kept working
8:17
in the ER and started thinking
8:19
about what was next. So
8:21
for me, the thing
8:24
I did in 2021 really
8:26
did also change the
8:28
course of Feminine, which was that
8:30
I went to go work for the Biden
8:32
-Harris Administration as a regional director in the
8:34
Department of Health and Human Services, which
8:36
was an incredible honor to be a presidential
8:38
appointee after especially the experience we had
8:40
with COVID. But also really gave me a
8:42
chance to integrate a lot of my
8:44
experiences as a clinical emergency physician and also
8:46
think about policy changes that had to
8:48
happen at the national level. The
8:50
really important factor for anybody
8:52
out there thinking about becoming
8:54
a presidential appointee, regardless of
8:56
the president, is you cannot
8:58
own or run a health
9:00
care organization if you work
9:03
for the administration as an
9:05
appointee. So as one of
9:07
the conditions of my employment, I
9:09
had to transfer ownership and all
9:12
activities of Feminine to Jenny, back
9:14
as May. She'll talk about
9:16
that in a second. But really,
9:18
that was the reason that
9:20
Feminine hibernated was that because of
9:22
my job in the federal
9:24
government, I could not either help
9:26
make decisions for Feminine, help
9:28
organize the conferences. And all of
9:30
us got very busy basically
9:32
keeping ourselves together. I also moved
9:34
from Brooklyn to Scarstale, which
9:36
is very exciting for me. Have
9:38
a new house, have fun
9:40
like that. And I have a couple
9:42
of kids. Actually, I have three. I need to
9:45
keep track of all of them. I have three
9:47
kids. And so now my daughter is about to
9:49
go to college. My son is a freshman in
9:51
high school and my other son is in seventh
9:53
grade. So it's busy times, but I am really
9:55
excited about the relaunch of Feminine and I'm really
9:57
excited to talk about what we're going to do
9:59
next. Isn't it amazing how
10:01
life just happens? So many life
10:03
events. I mean, you changed jobs,
10:05
you got through a pandemic, you
10:07
moved, I mean, wow. I mean,
10:10
I think there's a stress scale
10:12
out there about, you know, changing
10:14
jobs, health, you know, all of
10:16
those types of things. And you're
10:18
hitting a lot of the top
10:20
five right there. So good on
10:22
you for coming out of this
10:24
so successfully. But we need to
10:26
move on. Yeah, let's move on
10:28
to Esther because I want to
10:30
Esther, Well, it's a good question.
10:33
I'm not exactly sure what I
10:35
have been doing, but there was,
10:37
likewise, I also experience a pandemic,
10:39
strangely enough, and all the things
10:41
associated with that, a lot of
10:43
public health work, I would say.
10:45
And then in my day job,
10:47
other than being in the emergency
10:49
department, I am a health services
10:51
researcher. So I study health policy,
10:54
impact on health services of a
10:56
variety of things, but mostly focused
10:58
around opioid and cannabis use. And
11:00
so that. job has been very
11:02
busy and actually drifts a lot
11:04
over to what is happening in
11:06
health policy and health services related
11:08
to reproductive health. So I think
11:10
there's lots that's complementary and that
11:12
is what we're talking about today
11:15
because I think this is probably
11:17
the most significant and dramatic shift
11:19
in health care delivery that we've
11:21
seen in a while and understanding
11:23
its impact in emergency medicine. I
11:25
think is the first step, so
11:27
that we can best support our
11:29
workforce and know how to move
11:31
forward. Well, I'll have to make
11:33
a mental note about the opioid
11:35
use disorder stuff because our December,
11:38
hot off the press episode from
11:40
Academic Emergency Medicine, was about compassion
11:42
and the compassion that providers have.
11:44
and the perceived stigma that the
11:46
people with substance use disorder had.
11:48
And I thought it was a
11:50
really good topic and an excellent
11:52
discussion about the whole area of
11:54
substance use disorder and some of
11:56
the biases and stigma that we
11:59
can bring into that relationship. up
12:01
as providers and health care clinicians.
12:03
So I'm hoping I can pick
12:05
your brain later about it, but
12:07
that's about what we're here. Yeah, that'd
12:10
be great. Jenny, your turn. What
12:12
have you been up to for
12:14
the last five years? Of course,
12:16
besides doing CPR on feminine and
12:18
keeping it alive. I did keep
12:20
feminine on life support for
12:23
the last few years despite
12:25
Darrow's best efforts to kill it.
12:27
Did it have a DNR on it
12:29
or what a DNI? Yeah, you know I
12:31
every time I would try and give up
12:34
feminine to someone else or
12:36
consider selling it or consider
12:38
just you know putting it into a
12:41
grave, I thought back to all these
12:43
wonderful experiences that we had, including some
12:45
with you can at the feminine ID
12:47
exchange, and I just couldn't do it.
12:49
I just felt like there is something
12:51
there and I know that there will
12:53
be a time. later if it's my
12:55
if it's my time or dare is
12:58
time again where there's going to be
13:00
a reason for this to still exist
13:02
so I just kind of kept it
13:04
alive barely in the background because I
13:06
was quite busy you know as the
13:09
other two mentioned we did go through
13:11
this thing called a pandemic and
13:13
it took a lot of our time and
13:15
our energy and a lot of us had
13:17
to do a lot of self-care to get
13:20
through that in addition during that I had
13:22
a baby who's now three. And so I
13:24
have been doing all of the things
13:26
that come with early years of motherhood,
13:29
pregnancy and motherhood in the last few
13:31
years, well, feminine has been on life
13:33
support. So it's been a wonderful ride,
13:36
but I am very excited that now
13:38
that my kid is entering her preschool
13:40
years, feminine is back and I have
13:42
some time to spend with it again.
13:45
There's just something so special about
13:47
feminine. You could feel it back
13:49
2017, 2018, 2019. Something really great.
13:52
So I'm glad that you kept
13:54
it on life support and you
13:56
did not terminate or pull the
13:58
plug on it because... It's too
14:00
good. It's too good to give up on.
14:02
I just couldn't do it. You've brought us
14:05
up to speed. We're at 2025. I've
14:07
got my favorite number of questions
14:09
to ask you. That's right. Five.
14:11
And so each of you can respond
14:13
to any of the questions. You can
14:15
all respond. You can not respond. But
14:18
we're just going to go through this
14:20
list of five. And we're going to
14:22
start with the very first and most
14:24
obvious question. Why are you relaunching
14:27
feminine feminine? So I'll
14:29
start with that one. So when I
14:31
left the federal government and feminine was
14:33
hibernating, I really had to sit with
14:35
what was its purpose anymore and more
14:38
importantly, how is it going to exist?
14:40
So we don't always like to talk
14:42
about the financial viability of organizations and
14:44
the ability to support staff and time
14:46
and bookkeepers and accountants and all the
14:48
things, but. When feminine 1.0 existed,
14:50
we ran it very much like
14:53
a glass door model, which is
14:55
an employment-based model that where employers
14:58
supported the work we were doing
15:00
around the idea that a viable
15:02
workforce in emergency medicine was really
15:05
important to employers. The pandemic taught
15:07
us a lot and has really opened
15:10
a lot of our eyes into how
15:12
much of an investment certain groups and
15:14
certain organizations want to make in our
15:17
workforce. And it was clear to me
15:19
that that was not a strategy, a
15:21
fiscal strategy that would be at least
15:24
immediately possible, especially given the fact that,
15:26
you know, we were still dealing with
15:28
like, you know, COVID backlash. Our physicians
15:31
are overworked and underpaid. And so going
15:33
back to physician employers and asking them
15:35
to support an organization, while we know that
15:37
physician salaries are going down and we're working
15:40
harder than ever before, did not feel like
15:42
the right. strategy. So I kind of sat
15:44
with it for about six or eight months
15:46
and didn't know. And then as the reproductive
15:49
health care policies around the country started
15:51
really kind of getting embedded and we
15:54
realize that many physicians are practicing medicine
15:56
state by state in a way that
15:58
we've never seen before. No other practice
16:00
of medicine has seen this level of
16:03
disconnect. What happens in one state versus
16:05
a neighboring state? And Estrasees is almost
16:07
daily in Oregon versus Idaho. You know,
16:09
what does it look like to take
16:11
care of a patient? There is a
16:14
real need to galvanize and support the
16:16
emergency medicine community around the care of
16:18
reproductive health care patients and also still
16:20
support women physicians in emergency medicine. And
16:22
so it really kind of dawns on
16:25
me after doing some consulting work. for
16:27
six or eight months after I left
16:29
the federal government, that there was an
16:31
opportunity to marry those two missions, to
16:33
take the work we had done on
16:36
gender equity in the workplace, and also
16:38
as a nonprofit, right, which is not
16:40
how feminine had started because I was
16:42
using the revenue stream from employers to
16:44
facilitate the work we were doing, actually
16:47
to form it as a nonprofit and
16:49
have grant funding to support the care
16:51
of patients in emergency medicine. starting with
16:53
reproductive health care, but really expanding for
16:56
as much as we we find grants
16:58
and we think about the work we're
17:00
doing, because that is where the need
17:02
is, right? So one of the things
17:04
we've seen over the past couple of
17:07
years, and again, this is a very
17:09
American problem, but at the same time,
17:11
what happens on our doorstep leaves out
17:13
so many places, excuse my analogy, to
17:15
our neighboring countries and to our physicians
17:18
who go back and forth, it's really
17:20
important that we address the care of
17:22
patients in emergency medicine and the care
17:24
of the people who are taking care
17:26
of those patients. And so feminine gets
17:29
to do both in this new iteration.
17:31
We're going to launch with the same
17:33
website. So it's the same address, right?
17:35
It's still feminine.org, but it will be
17:37
a brand new website with a lot
17:40
deeper resources. So deeper resources on policies
17:42
and protocols on. employment for women in
17:44
medicine, but also on reproductive health care
17:46
delivery at topic pregnancy, you know, miscarriage
17:49
management. What does it look like to
17:51
start contraception? What does it look like?
17:53
to have a
17:55
library of resources so
17:57
making sure that
18:00
we have a well
18:02
curated research library
18:04
of important articles around
18:06
both gender equity and
18:08
medicine and professional development of women
18:10
and also the care of
18:13
patients in regards to reproductive health
18:15
care. So really serving as
18:17
a resource for our community and
18:19
bringing everybody back together
18:21
having some development programs on
18:23
women and medicine groups also state
18:25
-based policy groups so if you're
18:28
practicing emergency medicine in a
18:30
state like Idaho getting together all
18:32
of those physicians who care for
18:34
patients in Idaho not just women
18:36
physicians and making sure that we
18:38
share best practices and policies across
18:40
the state like Idaho or Tennessee
18:42
where it has become confusing sometimes
18:45
to practice emergency medicine especially with
18:47
things like the mtala decision
18:49
which you know we are speaking
18:51
a little bit freely about
18:53
but you know the mtala the
18:55
decision about where mtala applies
18:57
to emergency patients um is not
18:59
something that many of us
19:01
thought five years ago. Not
19:04
everybody will know what mtala is so if
19:06
you could just expand just a tiny
19:08
bit for our non -americans. Yeah
19:10
so mtala Escherche
19:12
why don't you take it from here? Do you
19:14
want to take it from here or do
19:16
you want me to keep going? No keep going
19:18
keep going because I'm I'm next and I'll
19:20
jump in as I need to. So mtala is
19:22
the Emergency Medicine Treatment and Labor Act was
19:24
passed in the 1980s to make sure that all
19:26
patients in American emergency departments got care at the
19:28
door stabilized regardless of their ability to
19:30
pay and what has happened and this
19:32
has been a real kind of foundation
19:34
of what emergency medicine is in the
19:37
United States we take care of patients
19:39
first and foremost we do not ask
19:41
them for their insurance or their checkbook
19:43
or their credit card at the door
19:45
it was obviously passed to take care
19:47
of the most vulnerable patients amongst us
19:49
these were originally low -income patients who
19:52
often were patients of trauma that were
19:54
being transferred from a private facility to
19:56
a public hospital and they were dying
19:58
on the way sometimes in a stretcher down
20:00
the block. And Emtala really is
20:02
the foundation of what it means
20:04
to take care of anyone, any
20:07
place, any time, regardless of their
20:09
ability to pay. And in the
20:11
United States right now, there is
20:13
a question about whether or not
20:15
the care that somebody might need
20:17
in an emergency, if it includes
20:19
a termination of a pregnancy, would
20:21
be protected under Emtala. And I
20:23
say that as we talk about
20:25
Idaho, Idaho, because it is the
20:27
Idaho solicitor general that brought this
20:29
to the United States Supreme Court.
20:32
And so when you are practicing
20:34
emergency medicine in Idaho, you may
20:36
be transferring patients out to a
20:38
neighboring state for emergency care. Yes,
20:40
sir. The L and M tala
20:42
stands for labor. And so reproductive
20:44
rights were already embedded in that
20:46
1980s law, correct? Yes, and so
20:48
the labor part of it included
20:50
active labor. So what it really
20:52
meant was that somebody that was
20:54
presenting to a private hospital in
20:56
active labor could not be shut
20:59
to a county hospital to deliver
21:01
their baby. What has happened because
21:03
of the term labor is that
21:05
there are a lot of people
21:07
that say that that means that
21:09
no pregnancy can be terminated under
21:11
EMTALA. And so there is actually
21:13
a lot of conversation about what
21:15
does it mean to take the
21:17
original intent of EMTALA and actually
21:19
apply it to the current state.
21:21
And again, the only reason that
21:24
this all comes up is to
21:26
say that this web of confusing
21:28
litigation or confusing laws. Married with
21:30
our existing best practices in medicine,
21:32
which actually haven't changed, is one
21:34
of the reasons why feminine 2.0
21:36
as a non-profit centered on gender
21:38
equity for physicians and the care
21:40
of our patients is so important.
21:42
Because if you think about the
21:44
moral injury to physicians, not just
21:46
women physicians, but the moral injury
21:49
to providers after a pandemic like
21:51
COVID, to come back and then
21:53
now work in a state which
21:55
has changed your practice capabilities. because
21:57
you are constantly concerned about being
21:59
in a court of law to
22:01
say, I practiced the right evidence
22:03
based care. But then you've been
22:05
charged with a crime, you have
22:07
had to hire a lawyer, you
22:09
maybe take time off of work.
22:12
And we know from the data
22:14
on litigation stress, what that does
22:16
to physicians and how many physicians
22:18
will practice then defensive medicine. in
22:20
anticipation of that risk? And
22:23
what does that mean for patients?
22:25
So again, like, I just want
22:27
to frame out, the reason why
22:30
we've decided to launch Feminem 2.0
22:32
is this is a, are we
22:34
allowed to curse on your podcast?
22:36
No, I'd lose my iTunes ratings
22:38
and as a Canadian, as a
22:40
Canadian, I'd have to say Sorrier.
22:42
F-ing mess, right? And so we
22:45
are here as a community to
22:47
hold hands with each other across
22:49
emergency medicine, across other specialties to
22:51
say to our colleagues in OBG-N
22:53
and family medicine and a lot
22:55
of our rural family practice doctors,
22:57
you know, we are in community,
22:59
we are heard together. And so
23:02
that's a very long answer to
23:04
your first question, which means this
23:06
is going to be a really
23:08
long podcast. Hey, the quality of the
23:10
podcast is not depend on the length.
23:12
Is it independent of the length? And
23:14
as long as we're getting this great
23:16
high quality content, we could go all
23:18
day. But if I could summarize some
23:20
of the stuff that I've heard is
23:22
you left the Fed. There's this thing called
23:25
a glass door, which I was not
23:27
familiar with, and I thought you were
23:29
trying to make some Freudian sort of
23:31
thing to a glass ceiling to connect
23:33
it to Faminem. And then you talked
23:35
about some of these key changes that
23:38
are to come, talking about reproductive rights,
23:40
employment equity for women physicians and beyond,
23:42
and also, you know, obviously my ear
23:44
perked up when you're talking about evidence-based
23:47
protocols and evidence-based policies, and so that
23:49
everyone, no matter who they are or
23:51
how they identify, gets the best care
23:53
based on the best evidence as a
23:56
as a resource. So you're going to
23:58
be some resource for some of these,
24:00
like a repository for some of
24:02
these best practices and best evidence.
24:04
And of course, being up in
24:07
Canada, when the U.S. gets a
24:09
cold, we come down with a
24:11
life-threatening septic pneumonia because you are
24:13
very influential. Right, Jenny, we've heard a
24:15
lot from Dara about the relaunch of
24:18
feminine. I'm just wondering, what are you
24:20
looking for? What do you think
24:22
the key change that's going to
24:24
come with this reimagination or feminine 2.
24:26
To me, the key thing is
24:29
really that we're taking feminine
24:31
from an organization whose mission
24:34
statement was the support of
24:36
women practicing emergency
24:39
medicine to expanding it to
24:41
encompassing all women in emergency
24:43
medicine. So that means the
24:45
people practicing it as well
24:47
as the patients that we're
24:50
taking care of. So in
24:52
my mind, we're now kind
24:54
of siphoning off two major
24:56
parts of our organization, the
24:58
previous part that was focused
25:01
on the professional development and
25:03
the support of the practitioners,
25:05
is not going anywhere. That's
25:07
going to be alive and
25:09
well and everyone can come to
25:11
that part for everything they've grown
25:14
to love. But we're expanding it
25:16
to include this much needed portion
25:18
of the care of women patients,
25:21
female identifying patients or
25:23
patients who have female
25:25
anatomy in the emergency department
25:27
which is a very crucial thing to
25:30
be done specifically at this juncture but
25:32
probably throughout history in emergency medicine. I
25:34
love it that you're heading towards
25:37
my world more of evidence-based medicine where
25:39
you have those three pillars and you
25:41
know those two of those pillars one
25:44
is the clinician which you've been talking
25:46
about and feminine has been working on
25:48
to improve the clinician and also the
25:51
literature so that's the the other pillar
25:53
the literature that informs those clinicians but
25:55
involving and inviting and engaging with patients
25:57
exactly and asking what they value and
26:00
what they prefer. And so you're bringing
26:02
that into the organization. Well done. I
26:04
like the change. Thank you. Chu, do you
26:07
want to add anything about what are
26:09
the key changes or where you see
26:11
this transition going to before we get
26:13
to the next question? No, I think
26:16
actually a lot of that feeds into
26:18
the next question if you want to
26:20
move ahead. So the second question is
26:22
about the new mission and
26:24
vision. And the new mission
26:26
statement from feminine focuses. on
26:28
advancing gender equity in emergency
26:30
medicine and improving reproductive health
26:32
care delivery in emergency departments.
26:34
So Chu, what strategies will
26:37
feminine use to achieve these
26:39
very specific goals? Yeah, I
26:41
think some of them dare already hit
26:43
on, but obviously we want to
26:45
strengthen the clinical care we already
26:47
provide. So this is not something new,
26:49
we already do reproductive health care, but
26:51
this is a time in history where
26:54
we need to bring our aid game.
26:56
We need to explore what kinds of
26:58
things we need to do to meet
27:00
emerging needs in a rapidly shifting political
27:02
landscape. And we need to figure out
27:04
what is the top of our license. And
27:06
this is what emergency medicine does all
27:08
the time when there's changing public health
27:11
needs. We meet it. So I think
27:13
20 years ago it would have been
27:15
unheard of to address, say, the substance
27:17
use disorder crisis, the opioid crisis, the
27:19
way that we do. I mean, people
27:21
would throw things in meeting if you
27:23
talk about screening for HIV. or for
27:25
substance use or for mental health conditions.
27:27
And we do a lot of those
27:29
things as a matter of course now.
27:31
So we are the most changing specialty,
27:33
I would say. We basically look around and
27:36
we say, what are the needs that need to
27:38
be met because we're the safety net and
27:40
after us comes no one. So I think
27:42
right now we need to be the reproductive
27:44
health safety net. There's no question. We just
27:47
cannot leave all of this to OB guy.
27:49
So a lot of what feminine will do
27:51
in this new launch is really think about.
27:53
What in what ways do we expand and
27:55
grow in response to what's happening around
27:57
us? And then, you know, some of these...
28:00
issues are medical but also medical legal
28:02
so how do we understand policy
28:04
and how much it can interfere
28:06
with our care and so how
28:08
do we address those things and
28:10
so that will be the quad
28:12
facto of good clinical resources education
28:14
and that is a very holistic
28:16
education it includes you know didactic
28:18
materials CME, better ultrasound training it
28:20
will be a research agenda both
28:22
understanding and making accessible existing research
28:24
and sponsoring and conducting some of
28:26
our own research and then I'll
28:28
be building community and I think
28:30
some of that will really build
28:32
off the infrastructure that feminine had
28:34
the four ways of gathering bringing
28:36
people together because this work is
28:38
so hard it is not to
28:40
be done in silos that is
28:42
incredibly inefficient and actually very hard
28:44
to do because things change so
28:46
fast and so where a lot
28:48
of what we're building in feminine
28:50
is how do we get people
28:52
to communicate well in their institutions,
28:54
in their states, in their regions
28:56
with people practicing in similar practice
28:58
settings and in counting the same
29:00
challenges and figuring out how we
29:03
create. the environment where people can
29:05
come together and move forward efficiently
29:07
and be stronger because they have
29:09
the wisdom of a dozen women,
29:11
a hundred women, rather than just
29:13
trying to make things up as
29:15
they go along. So there's a
29:17
lot embedded in each of those
29:19
things, but I think those are
29:21
the pillars of what we want
29:23
to do. And the only thing
29:25
I want to add is, you
29:27
know, gender equity is such a
29:29
key part of this. I mean,
29:31
we've had so much discussion about
29:33
Should we just focus on reproductive
29:35
health care or should we keep
29:37
going with this gender equity and
29:39
community building peace? But I think
29:41
because of everything, Dara said, because
29:43
we need to come together, and
29:45
because the fundamental problem we are
29:47
tackling here is gender inequity. I
29:49
mean, you cannot name another health
29:51
problem that is treated like this
29:53
for men. I mean, have you
29:55
ever felt that as a man,
29:57
you go to a hospital and
29:59
And the government is going to
30:01
step in and say where the
30:03
parameters of your care should be
30:05
or say that because of the
30:07
mancare you received, you may actually
30:09
have to face legal consequences or
30:11
lose your license or be brought
30:13
to court or be fined because
30:15
of the way that your man
30:17
issue was treated. I think they're
30:19
fundamentally at the root of this
30:21
entire reason we're together is gender
30:23
equity. And so there is a
30:25
higher purpose here as we need
30:27
to address some of the drivers.
30:29
of how we got here and
30:31
that needs to be done by,
30:33
you know, again, by community by
30:35
bringing women together and by addressing
30:37
these issues. But this is not
30:39
to the exclusion of women. Obviously,
30:41
Ken, you were first in the
30:43
door for feminine and we hope
30:45
to make sure that people understand
30:47
that the resources and opportunities we're
30:49
building are for everybody in emergency
30:51
medicine and for a gender issue
30:53
for the clinician per se, right?
30:56
Like it's not about my gender
30:58
necessarily with regards to the care.
31:00
And so I think it's gender
31:02
less. It affects every clinician who's
31:04
trying to provide care. I don't
31:06
know if your question was rhetorical
31:08
about have I had my medical
31:10
decisions restricted based on my chromosomes,
31:12
my fact that I am lacking
31:14
in X and that I have
31:16
a Y. The answer of course
31:18
is no. But also, you know,
31:20
and I'm careful not to come
31:22
across as a smug Canadian, but
31:24
it also doesn't affect women XX
31:26
or whatever, you know, like if
31:28
you want to get into chromosomes,
31:30
gender, all that, that's a confusing
31:32
sometimes longer. That's a whole other
31:34
podcast, we'll leave it that. But
31:36
reproductive rights and stuff like that
31:38
in Canada are much different than
31:40
in the US, and the US
31:42
has taken a significant change and
31:44
turn that will have material impact
31:46
on women's health. And so I
31:48
still think that... the question if
31:50
you asked a male physician in
31:52
the US or a male in
31:54
the US, I don't think that
31:56
there, maybe you guys can. confirm
31:58
their health care will not be
32:00
restricted or impaired or because of
32:02
that. Is that correct? It's still
32:04
the same in the US and
32:06
Canada if you're a man. That's
32:08
right. No, I think that's true.
32:10
And I think that's true. And I think
32:12
that also goes back to some of
32:15
the things about the mission and the
32:17
vision that I just want to add
32:19
to what Esther said, which is that
32:21
a, no organization can be everything to
32:23
everyone all the time. And so it
32:25
is going to be true that in
32:27
this iteration of feminine, we are very
32:29
transparent about some of the issues we're
32:31
going to face are exclusively American issues.
32:33
Some of them are going to be
32:35
exclusively childbearing issues. Some of them may
32:37
be exclusively female, I would say, gender
32:39
perception issues, right? So whereas a lot
32:41
of our policies and protocols, and the
32:43
work we're going to do is going
32:46
to apply to all female identifying people.
32:48
But some won't. Right. Some will only
32:50
apply to fertile female identifying people or
32:53
fertile people, you know, alone. Some will
32:55
apply to patients who take care of
32:57
everybody who can procreate. Right. So there's
33:00
so many different ways the work we're
33:02
going to do is going to impact
33:04
both patients and providers. And it I
33:07
think that sometimes I think I ask
33:09
for for myself, but I think we
33:11
have to ask for each other grace
33:13
in the idea that not every project
33:16
or every. or every program, every protocol
33:18
is going to be applicable to everybody.
33:20
And I also think that that, because
33:22
there's so much that has to be done,
33:25
right? And if we only did things that
33:27
were applicable to everybody all the time, we
33:29
would miss so much of the nuance, honestly,
33:31
the niche stuff that is even, for people
33:34
that are even more marginalized or less commonly
33:36
thought about because it doesn't apply to everybody
33:38
all the time. And so we hope to
33:40
do a lot of that work that is
33:42
being missed by other people. And I think
33:45
the other thing to say is that in
33:47
the iteration where feminine is a nonprofit that
33:49
has a deep bench and a broad
33:51
team, you know, last time we did
33:53
it, it was very in many ways
33:55
bootstrappy, right? Economically, I put a lot of
33:58
my own money behind it personally because because
34:00
I felt so strongly about getting it
34:02
going. It was an LLC, it had
34:04
a revenue stream, and as soon as
34:06
I got pulled out of the project,
34:08
the project didn't have enough. enough lift
34:10
to stay alive actually. Nobody could dedicate
34:12
that much time unpaid. Nobody could dedicate
34:14
that much energy and it became and
34:17
then obviously we had COVID and other
34:19
things were happening. But the reason I
34:21
say that is to say that the
34:23
goal for this iteration of feminine is
34:25
a non-profit. Feminim to point out is
34:27
that not a single person is the
34:29
core of what is going to happen.
34:31
Right. It will have grant funding, sustainable
34:33
funding, hopefully annualized grants. It will have
34:35
a large board of board of directors.
34:38
It will have a team of physician
34:40
of physician. who will own different parts
34:42
of it, will invest in more professional
34:44
development programs like Esther said that are
34:46
local, so that, you know, a lot
34:48
of these groups that survived in departments
34:50
and in cities, and, you know, even
34:52
all New York City or all LA,
34:54
that is where we're going to invest
34:56
a lot of our resources. So that
34:58
this is so much bigger than the
35:01
team at the, you know, that's spending
35:03
a lot of time doing it, but
35:05
it really is meeting the moment because
35:07
many of something was missing when a
35:09
feminine. sunset it, right? But it couldn't
35:11
come back until a core group of
35:13
people could dedicate this much time and
35:15
energy to bringing it back. But just
35:17
because a core group of people is
35:19
bringing it back, there needs to be
35:22
a huge team of people keeping it
35:24
alive because that is the only way
35:26
this thing survives for the next generation
35:28
of women in emergency medicine and honestly
35:30
the next generation of patients we take
35:32
care of. That's an important point because
35:34
sustainability for these types of initiatives is
35:36
so important and we've seen that Since
35:38
2012 with the rise of foam ed
35:40
the free open access to medical education
35:42
There is this sort of curve that
35:45
comes where you get this huge Increase
35:47
and everybody jumps on and people are
35:49
starting their own blog and podcast and
35:51
here we are 12 13 years later,
35:53
and there's been a bit of culling
35:55
of the herd There's not as many
35:57
blogs and podcasts in the foamed space
35:59
and the one that are sometimes aren't
36:01
as active. And so if you want
36:03
to create something that's going to last,
36:06
you've got to find some, I mean, I'm
36:08
just finishing my NBA, so some way to,
36:10
you know, like sustain it, you know, and
36:12
it really was, you champion feminine 1.0,
36:14
but now we're going to have feminine
36:17
2.0 where it's a much different
36:19
organization, it's non-profit, it's going to
36:22
have a board of directors, you
36:24
know, hopefully sustainable funding from grants
36:26
and things like that. God forbid
36:29
anything happens to any one individual.
36:31
It's the mission. It's the organization
36:33
that will continue with or without
36:36
some of those really important people,
36:38
but the organization and the mission
36:40
is above that is more important.
36:43
I did have one clarifying question
36:45
for you, Chu, and I heard
36:47
you talking and you mentioned something
36:49
about attending meetings where people were
36:51
throwing things at you. My mind
36:53
works this way, and so automatically
36:56
I go back to movies. And
36:58
I know it's a little outside
37:00
my era. It's from 1992,
37:02
a league of their own. And there's
37:04
no crying in baseball. There's
37:07
no throwing things in meetings.
37:09
Who are you inviting to meetings?
37:11
Where people are you inviting
37:14
to meetings? Where people are
37:16
throwing things in meetings? Who
37:18
are you inviting to meetings? People
37:20
would throw things. Not at me.
37:22
But there were actually meetings where
37:24
maybe throwing things is a little
37:26
dramatic, but I remember at the
37:28
beginning of my career when somebody
37:30
would come to a meeting and
37:32
introduce the idea of doing some of
37:35
these public health measures in the
37:37
emergency department. This was really at
37:39
the beginning of addressing public health
37:41
needs in the emergency department by
37:44
systematized screening for things like HIV,
37:46
Pepsi, opiate use disorders, you know,
37:48
so that we could then initiate
37:50
therapy or do. do referrals and warm handoffs
37:53
to make sure that people got their services because
37:55
they weren't showing up to primary care either. So
37:57
where could we capture people who had really high
37:59
public health? needs. That was in the
38:01
emergency department, but there were people,
38:03
and there still are, but much
38:05
more than, who were like, I
38:07
treat heart attacks, I treat trauma,
38:09
I treat strokes, and sepsis, and
38:11
anything else is for primary care.
38:13
And of course, you know, that
38:15
answer is not the right one,
38:17
especially in places like the United
38:19
States, where so many millions, tens
38:21
of millions of people don't have
38:23
ready access to primary care. Yeah,
38:25
the hair in the back of
38:27
my neck always goes up when
38:29
somebody says, it's not my job.
38:31
You know, it may not be
38:33
your job specifically to do that
38:35
specific care, but it is your
38:37
job to facilitate it if that
38:39
patient comes in and there's always
38:41
something you can do and help
38:44
them with. And that doesn't necessarily
38:46
mean you're going to be doing
38:48
that specific care. But like you
38:50
said, a warm handoff to make
38:52
sure that the people do get
38:54
the care they need. And one
38:56
of the things that... bothers me
38:58
sometimes about fellow emergency physicians is
39:00
that they do think that they're
39:02
only there for emergencies and I
39:04
view it slightly different. I think
39:06
we're there to assess everyone to
39:08
see if they have an emergency
39:10
and to pick the signal out
39:12
of the noise and that's where
39:14
our skill set is and the
39:16
patient defines whether they think this
39:18
is urgent or emergent and needs
39:20
to come in and I'm happy
39:22
that most of the time it
39:24
isn't. And then I can refer
39:26
them on to the appropriate individual
39:28
that can take care of them.
39:30
So we've heard about this new
39:32
mission and vision, Jenny. Can you
39:34
give me a little bit more
39:36
about the strategies that will be
39:38
used in feminine to achieve the
39:40
goals that they're trying to achieve
39:42
with this new mission and vision?
39:44
I think the really specific change
39:46
that people are going to see
39:48
within feminine is... a model that
39:50
now includes a lot more actual
39:52
CME content and actual protocols. And
39:54
this can be a place that
39:56
you can come for, even, you
39:58
know, tip of the finger knowledge.
40:00
on shift. Famnam didn't used to
40:02
have that kind of clinical focus.
40:04
It had much more of this
40:06
professional development focus. And I think
40:09
now this is going to be
40:11
a website and a resource that
40:13
people use on shift to get
40:15
access to information that they need,
40:17
as well as off shift to
40:19
get continuing medical education in this
40:22
area of medical care. I think
40:24
this brings up the next question very
40:26
nicely Ken. Okay, so number three, see
40:28
how she directed me there. So number
40:30
three is addressing reproductive health care challenges.
40:32
One of the standout components, because we've
40:34
been talking about some of the key
40:36
changes and stuff, one of the standout
40:38
components of this relaunch of feminine. is
40:40
the focus on reproductive health care
40:43
emergencies. So I'm looking for you
40:45
to elaborate on the evidence-based protocols
40:47
and resources feminine 2.0 plans to
40:50
implement and how they will impact
40:52
patient outcomes. So the reason why
40:54
I wanted to bridge those two conversations
40:57
is that a lot of the the
40:59
evidence-based protocols that we're going to talk
41:01
about. Some people sit without the outside
41:03
of the wheelhouse of what they traditionally
41:05
thought was their job in emergency medicine.
41:08
So for the last six or eight
41:10
months, I was consulting for an organization
41:12
called Access Bridge, so was Esther. And
41:14
so we have been working with
41:16
a team to work on these
41:18
protocols that basically create a diagnostic
41:20
algorithm around the evidence-based care for
41:23
patients having reproductive health care emergencies
41:25
specifically in the first trimester. So
41:27
thinking about things like ectopic pregnancy
41:29
decision making or management of a
41:31
miscarriage, but also putting into context
41:33
some of the changing landscape of access
41:35
and opportunity that patients may have in
41:38
states with new restrictions on abortion access,
41:40
which again, plenty of people will tell
41:42
us. that abortion restrictions have nothing to
41:44
do with decision making around miscarriage management.
41:46
And then I will remind them that
41:48
three of the articles we heard from
41:50
Pro Public of this year were women
41:52
who were having miscarriages who died because
41:54
the care they needed was not delivered
41:56
and the state they lived in had
41:59
an abortion ban. can tell me
42:01
that correlation is not causation and
42:03
this time I'm going to say
42:05
you're wrong because in states that
42:07
are restricting abortion access we are
42:10
seeing collateral damage to patients around
42:12
the delivery of care in non-elective
42:14
terminations in places like that are
42:16
the diagnostic decision-making and treatment for
42:18
ectopic pregnancies or miscarriages and the
42:21
protocols that we've developed will help
42:23
neutralize the concern that you're making
42:25
a decision in a moment for
42:27
a patient rather than following best
42:30
practices. So we've scored the evidence
42:32
of the articles around, let's say,
42:34
decision-making on a topic pregnancy. And
42:36
we know that the decision-making on
42:38
a topic pregnancy when informed by
42:41
the patient's condition and ultrasound findings
42:43
and the beta HCG level can...
42:45
present a opportunity to advise the
42:47
patient on whether or not they
42:50
want to have methotrexate for a
42:52
obvious ectopic pregnancy without a fetal
42:54
pole or maybe a presumed ectopic
42:56
pregnancy with a beta HCG that's
42:59
high enough to make that decision.
43:01
But most importantly that a physician
43:03
in a state where they are
43:05
concerned that they have to have
43:07
diagnostic certainty, they can then look
43:10
at the protocol and say actually.
43:12
This is my ultrasound, this is
43:14
my patient, this is my beta
43:16
HCG, this is my path, I'm
43:19
calling GYN and I am having
43:21
a conversation about, you know, offering
43:23
this patient methotrexate because their beta
43:25
HCG is 4,000 and my ultrasound
43:28
officially does not show an interuter
43:30
in pregnancy. Those protocols are are
43:32
very central to empowering physicians to
43:34
practice evidence-based medicine when there are
43:36
lots of noise around them and
43:39
concern that they may be criminalized
43:41
or charged with a crime or
43:43
even questioned after the fact. And
43:45
that's one of the things that
43:48
for us, we are reminding emergency
43:50
physicians that even though you may
43:52
not yourself be seeing this practice
43:54
change in your ER on the
43:56
day you worked, the field is
43:59
saying that there are issues. Estrand
44:01
I did some research on this
44:03
and found that emergency medicine physicians
44:05
across the country were changing their
44:08
practice around ectopic pregnancy decision-making to
44:10
be more certain to have another ultrasound
44:12
to have a higher beta HCG in
44:14
order to go down that diet the
44:17
treatment algorithm for ectopic pregnancy and the
44:19
same thing is obviously true for miscarriage
44:21
management to ensure that patients are getting
44:24
the best evidence in 2018. the American
44:26
College of Obstetricians and
44:29
Gynecologists. Again, we think the
44:31
Canadian College probably says the same thing,
44:33
but I can't speak for the
44:35
Canadians, but ACOG put out
44:37
its best practices policy statement,
44:39
which says that patients should
44:41
be offered medication management. which
44:43
includes Miffa Pristone for miscarriage
44:45
2018. This is prior to
44:47
the Dobbs decision, it has
44:49
nothing to do with the
44:51
elective termination of pregnancy, and
44:53
yet we're seeing states like
44:55
Louisiana change access and availability
44:58
to Miffa Pristone, and that
45:00
changes whether or not a physician feels
45:02
comfortable necessarily writing that
45:04
prescription, again, having nothing
45:07
to do with electraformation.
45:09
So. we will provide resources to
45:11
teach physicians how to have myfopristone
45:13
on formulary and how to be
45:15
certified to prescribe myfopristone
45:17
for miscarriage. Again, in other states
45:19
like in New York and California
45:22
and Oregon where Esther and I
45:24
practice in work, you may decide
45:26
as a provider to understand more
45:28
about medication abortion administration and your
45:31
emergency department and that is an opportunity
45:33
that people should have. We're seeing very
45:35
successful data come out of California. Another
45:37
one of our teammates, if you will,
45:40
in the work we did at Access Bridge,
45:42
Monica Sixenna published very successful data showing
45:44
that you can prescribe Mifurpristone
45:46
from the emergency department for
45:48
the elective termination of a
45:50
pregnancy and have really success in
45:52
patient outcomes insofar as the patient is
45:55
getting the care that they're looking for.
45:57
And as physicians who take care of whole
45:59
patients. and really try to deliver patient-centered
46:01
care that is equitable and accessible. It's
46:04
really important that we create access points
46:06
for all care across the board, but
46:08
it is. And it's foundation important
46:10
that we as emergency physicians know how
46:13
to take best care of our patients.
46:15
And when the system is falling
46:17
apart around us, and that system could
46:19
be as simple as decreased number of
46:22
OBGY plans in your community, changes
46:24
in access in community pharmacies, patients losing
46:26
access to insurance because your state
46:28
Medicaid laws are changing under federal government
46:30
changes. Like there's a lot of things
46:33
that are about to happen. again,
46:35
in the United States patient access, that
46:37
we as emergency physicians will be holding
46:39
the ball, if you will, you
46:42
know, Esther. That's, yeah. And that's why
46:44
we can't sit back and say let
46:46
it all play out with Obie
46:48
Guines or out in the community, because
46:51
it's hard to imagine a circumstance in
46:53
which it doesn't start to impact
46:55
our care. I mean, I think over
46:57
the past decade, there was a recent
47:00
Jama paper that said over the
47:02
past decade. something like 500 rural hospitals,
47:04
predominantly rural hospitals lost their maternal
47:06
care presence, meaning that where does that
47:08
care fall then? So you lost your
47:11
person and your department in the
47:13
hospital that you're going to call with
47:15
some of these maternal reproductive care emergencies
47:17
and so more falls to the
47:19
emergency department. We're seeing that trainees are
47:22
making different decisions about where they train
47:24
and where they stay after training
47:26
and that is. widening the maternal care
47:28
gaps that are already quite wide across
47:31
the country, where it is back
47:33
careful, back to the emergency department. It
47:35
means that we have fewer closed follow-up
47:37
options and we just want to
47:39
discharge and have them follow-up, and it
47:42
means that people will bounce back
47:44
to us instead of going to an
47:46
accessible clinic in their community. And so
47:48
there is no circumstance where we
47:50
can dodge these kind of issues, and
47:53
so we can either face it and
47:55
prepare, or we can have some
47:57
really bad shifts in the emergency department.
47:59
and then to where we're reliable for
48:02
poor care. And we talk about this
48:04
a lot, like it's the same,
48:06
like contraception initiation, right? Again, this
48:08
is something that sounds, you know,
48:10
we get a lot of pushback
48:12
when we have this conversation socially
48:14
about whether or not contraception should
48:16
be initiated in the emergency department.
48:18
And look, there's over the counter
48:20
contraception contraception. We do not talk
48:22
about motrin initiation has shown us
48:25
that this kind of. this medication,
48:27
it is available without a prescription.
48:29
So let's kind of talk about
48:31
our barriers to access. But having
48:33
just the conversation about whether or not
48:35
a patient wants to be pregnant or
48:37
wants to know more about contraception, plenty
48:39
of people take contraception and use contraception
48:42
not just to avoid pregnancy, right? But
48:44
it is really important and Esther and
48:46
I have talked a lot about. you
48:48
know, she'll text me after a shift
48:50
and be like, guess what I did
48:53
yesterday? You know, it's patients that are
48:55
ours, like it's patients that are undamissiled,
48:57
right, who want to be on contraception,
48:59
but they want to be on long
49:01
acting contraception because they know that getting
49:04
pregnant as a person without a home
49:06
is a not great plan and they
49:08
want to be empowered to, you know,
49:10
whatever it is, and being able to
49:13
offer them long acting contraception contraception in
49:15
the ED. is a, I mean, I don't think it's a
49:17
miracle, but it's a big deal. I mean,
49:19
Esther, do you want to speak to that?
49:21
I mean, no, I think it's true. Again, I mean,
49:23
a lot of people will say, and we
49:25
just did a survey study of clinician
49:28
attitudes towards something like contraception
49:30
provision or counseling and emergency
49:33
department, and it's a survey
49:35
because we need to ask people how
49:37
they feel, because this would be an
49:39
extension of the care we provide. And
49:42
there's certainly a lot of comments like.
49:44
This is not in our wheelhouse. Can't we send
49:46
them to primary care? Which they don't have, by
49:48
the way. And why do we need to ever
49:50
expand what emergency medicine does? But the problem is
49:53
everybody in the system is saying it's not their
49:55
issue. So talking with a colleague in Obie Guine
49:57
here, she's like, you know, the number of people.
50:00
We see who have been for 10
50:02
or 15 years on a teratogenic medication
50:04
without their prescribing physician ever talking to
50:06
them about what their plan is for
50:08
if they want to get pregnant, when
50:10
they want to get pregnant, what birth
50:13
control are on? And they are unaware.
50:15
No one has had this conversation. Do
50:17
you know that if you get pregnant
50:19
on this medication you need to stop
50:21
it? And it may be critical for
50:23
you to control your symptoms of whatever
50:26
rheumatologic disease they have, or you should
50:28
be on a contraception straight through, and
50:30
nobody has had that conversation. And you
50:32
know, for OB down, they're like, okay,
50:34
so their primary care wasn't having that
50:36
conversation. The rheumatologist is not having that
50:39
conversation. They don't have a women's health
50:41
provider, and they're showing up in your
50:43
ED, like who here can help us.
50:45
no more than a few minutes to
50:47
address. I mean, we, you know, I
50:49
think it's very obvious to care providers
50:52
that we are a source of medication
50:54
refills, right? I mean, that's not a
50:56
surprise. I'm sure that happens in, I
50:58
assume it's not a US problem, but
51:00
it also happens in Canada. They may
51:02
come in for something else and then
51:04
say, I also need some medical med
51:07
refills because I've run out and I'm
51:09
not going to see my primary care
51:11
for several months. And we generally like
51:13
refill those as a matter of those
51:15
as a matter of course. But we
51:17
carve a hole around contraception because we
51:20
feel like, oh, that needs a specialist.
51:22
When actually it has, it's a very
51:24
common and safe medication that's way more
51:26
common than the alternative, which is an
51:28
unplanned pregnancy. And yet we feel like
51:30
there's some special magic that needs to
51:33
happen in an opium clinic six months
51:35
from now. It doesn't make sense. It's
51:37
very interesting how we'll have these over-the-counter
51:39
medicines, like you were saying ibuprofen, and
51:41
talking about those types of things. you
51:43
know, we don't have those, oh, we've
51:46
got to have an informed consent decision,
51:48
whatever, and yet we shy away from
51:50
anything involving sex. And maybe that's the
51:52
difference. Maybe that's the correlation, Dara. Yes,
51:54
sex, gender, and all of it. And
51:56
I think that, I guess, these six.
51:59
a lot of this and saying, this
52:01
is health care. And that's why it's
52:03
an important thing for us to
52:05
address as evidence-based people, at people
52:07
who practice evidence-based medicine, let's kind
52:09
of incorporate that into our care
52:12
and not let other people redefine
52:14
our language around it. Well, I
52:16
like that Chu brought up the whole
52:18
idea of rural practices because that's an
52:21
area that I advocate for greatly. I
52:23
grew up on an apple farm. Apples
52:25
are a doctor's kryptonite. It's supposed to
52:27
lead. keep you away, but it didn't
52:30
keep me away having four or five
52:32
thousand apple trees. I went into medicine
52:34
anyways, but this whole idea of
52:36
rural medicine and my position
52:38
is that access to care should be
52:41
based on your need, not on your
52:43
postal code. Now I can translate that
52:45
for our American listeners, not based on
52:48
your zip code. So your zip code
52:50
shouldn't determine your access to care that
52:52
is necessary, right? And everybody should have
52:55
timely access and appropriate access to emergency
52:57
care. And that doesn't mean we have
52:59
a neurosurge in every rural town, but
53:02
we should have the setup that those
53:04
people can be assessed, stabilized, treated, and
53:06
transferred appropriately to definitive level of care
53:09
that may be outside the scope of
53:11
what can be done in a rural.
53:13
facility. And for you, Dara, when it
53:15
talks, when you talk about evidence-based medicine,
53:17
you know, it is hard to practice
53:19
medicine. The practice of medicine is
53:21
difficult, and the evidence-based medicine model
53:24
looks for the best evidence, which
53:26
means the least biased. So we're
53:28
looking for the best evidence, the
53:31
best literature, but we apply our
53:33
clinical judgment. And then, of course,
53:35
we ask the patients about their
53:37
values and preferences, and that's that
53:39
then diagram of the three pillars.
53:41
is politics and that would just
53:43
make it so much more complicated.
53:45
It's already very complicated, but that
53:47
adds a whole other layer. So
53:50
I'd really like just to get
53:52
back to that ethos, that philosophy
53:54
of evidence-based medicine and giving patients
53:56
the best care based on the
53:58
best evidence. Jenny back in... question
54:00
one you were talking about you
54:02
know key changes and inviting and
54:05
engaging with patients and women about
54:07
their health care and that was
54:09
a going to be a key
54:11
change with the relaunch of feminine
54:14
what's the impact that you think
54:16
that this will have with regards
54:18
to the patient outcomes when addressing
54:20
reproductive health care? Well I think
54:23
the Chu, who is on this
54:25
call, Chu is going to be
54:27
the one who's probably going to
54:29
do all the research who tells
54:32
us exactly what impact this has,
54:34
because that's her wheelhouse. But, you
54:36
know, in short, Ken, people are
54:38
dying. You know, you've heard stories
54:41
today about patients who are dying
54:43
in our emergency departments, in our
54:45
wards, because care is not happening
54:47
at home, because they're scared to
54:49
get the care that they need.
54:52
And that is unacceptable. It is
54:54
absolutely unacceptable. People are literally dying
54:56
for health care. For health care.
54:58
Right. For care that is not
55:01
hard and not complicated and not
55:03
controversial, it shouldn't be. Well, the
55:05
health care component part of it
55:07
isn't. Right. The medicine, the thing
55:10
that a doctor and a nurse
55:12
can do for a patient is
55:14
not. that is the impact and
55:16
and she will study it at
55:19
length I'm sure and give us
55:21
all the numbers but the main
55:23
thing is that nobody should be
55:25
dying for this. But we need
55:28
to keep moving along here and
55:30
so we're coming up to number
55:32
four and this one's an important
55:34
one this is about mentorship and
55:36
career development and I have to
55:39
tell you mentors were very important
55:41
to me and I'm sure you
55:43
had many mentors but when we're
55:45
talking about mentors for me and
55:48
education and leadership You know, the
55:50
legend of emergency medicine is Diane
55:52
Brumbomer. Dr. Brumbomer is just a
55:54
rock star who has helped me
55:57
out so much as an educator.
55:59
And I see that mentorship
56:01
and career development, you know, it's
56:04
always been a cornerstone of the
56:06
feminine, but I want to know
56:08
how new mentorship programs are going
56:10
to be designed to support women
56:12
in emergency medicine and what role
56:14
do they play in addressing issues
56:17
like burnout or moral injury and
56:19
also career development. Cheer,
56:21
you got to break some news here. Can I,
56:23
can I talk about it? I mean, I think
56:25
you can. It's
56:32
just funny to us that you
56:34
mentioned Diane because she will
56:36
be serving on the board
56:38
of directors of feminine and
56:40
because she is the legendary
56:42
mentor to countless people in
56:44
emergency medicine. She will be so influential
56:46
in how we develop this out for
56:48
many years to come. I mean, because
56:50
as you say, we're now changing as
56:52
an organization. I think some of this,
56:54
I mean, we know what we want
56:56
to do right now, but some of
56:58
this will evolve for the new times
57:01
and we really have to think about
57:03
what does mentorship mean in this new
57:05
era and how do we best support
57:07
people in doing very specific things and
57:09
implementing new models of care where they
57:11
are. And I think what you need
57:13
really depends on, it is like, you know,
57:15
kind of this big. and mentor model and
57:17
will lean on Diane a lot for
57:19
that and how we build community across
57:21
and gross across. our whole membership, but
57:23
mentorship in this area is a funny
57:25
thing because the best mentor to you
57:27
may be the closest person who practices
57:29
in a similar practice setting. And some
57:31
of those connections are not obvious. For
57:33
example, you can practice in the same
57:35
state and you have three other friends
57:37
who are interested in advanced and reproductive
57:39
care, but one of you works at
57:41
the VA Medical Center, you know, the
57:43
government run medical center, one of you
57:45
works in a public county hospital, and
57:48
one of you works in a Catholic
57:50
hospital. And the challenges that you face...
57:52
and the limits of what you can
57:54
do and the language you need to
57:56
learn and need to use and the
57:58
allies that you need. to implement care
58:01
changes are completely different. And so
58:03
we're really thinking about who is
58:05
the best person to meet your
58:07
needs institutionally when you're trying to
58:09
advance some of these topics and
58:12
have faced the same hardships you
58:14
have. And so that's part of
58:16
the exciting thing about feminine 2.0
58:18
is that we're, we've got a
58:21
lot of challenges and exciting challenges
58:23
and opportunities to try to match
58:25
people with the support they need.
58:27
And I think that one of the,
58:29
One of the things that we learned
58:32
last time and also one of the
58:34
things we're investing in is this kind
58:36
of deep broad and personalizable connectedness in
58:38
emergency medicine for people. I think that,
58:40
you know, again, if you are really
58:43
honest about where we are as a
58:45
specialty from five years ago, the level
58:47
of moral injury we have survived is
58:49
overwhelming. And it's not getting better every
58:51
day at all. And I don't even
58:54
know who's trying to make it better.
58:56
I think that a lot of our
58:58
clinical practice environments are with boarding and,
59:00
you know, violence and, you know, resource
59:02
issues not related to reproductive health care.
59:05
I mean, obviously, if you add in
59:07
legislative overreach to that, it's even worse.
59:09
But if you are just practicing emergency
59:11
medicine in a rural New York City
59:13
hospital, I mean, at an urban New
59:16
York City hospital like I am, you
59:18
know, it's not always that great. You
59:20
know, it's like, you know, Esther and
59:22
I talk about, compare notes about how
59:24
many patients were being held or how
59:27
much boarding there was or you know
59:29
how many patients you know stayed for
59:31
what period of time and we're hearing
59:33
this across the border from all emergency
59:36
professional you know emergency medicine providers regardless
59:38
of where they work and so I
59:40
think that there's a lot of the
59:42
practice of emergency medicine again that it's
59:44
not only related to women in medicine
59:47
but when you are a woman in
59:49
medicine and you are balancing so many
59:51
different things and you are thinking about
59:53
you know being a lead parent in
59:55
your house or all the other things
59:58
that we've balanced and you know we
1:00:00
see so many more issues now with
1:00:02
care response. is being shared amongst parents
1:00:04
because one of the benefits of the
1:00:06
pandemic, if you can say it that
1:00:09
way, is that a lot of people
1:00:11
resented their life to be more present
1:00:13
in their families. They did think about
1:00:15
what it was like to be a
1:00:17
present parent or present child or whatever
1:00:20
it is and prioritize whatever is important
1:00:22
to you. And that does require the
1:00:24
workplace to accommodate, you know, and to
1:00:26
create a flexibility that many people in
1:00:28
the world work from home, the aftermath
1:00:31
of COVID and not for us. But
1:00:33
it is a little bit for us,
1:00:35
right? How much conference is done virtually
1:00:37
now? How much, you know, how many
1:00:39
people are working from home to do
1:00:42
at least their research? There is a
1:00:44
level of acceptance that way. So I
1:00:46
guess when it comes to our mentorship
1:00:48
and career development, it will lead into
1:00:50
this new normal of emergency medicine that
1:00:53
is both worse and better and figure
1:00:55
out what does that mean for the
1:00:57
career development of? women physicians going forward,
1:00:59
again, not related to reproductive health care.
1:01:02
Although again, if you live in a
1:01:04
state as a person who can get
1:01:06
pregnant and thinking about your course as
1:01:08
a pregnant person, while you're also a
1:01:10
physician, that may inform your personal life,
1:01:13
not just your professional life as well.
1:01:15
Well, I mention how Diane Bernbomer is
1:01:17
one of my mentors and she is
1:01:19
a Legend
1:01:22
of emergency medicine. Jenny, do you
1:01:24
have any mentors? You want to
1:01:26
give a shout out too? Well,
1:01:29
I would be remiss if I
1:01:31
didn't say to Ann Burnbummer, but
1:01:33
I would also be remiss if
1:01:35
I didn't just say to other
1:01:37
people on this call. I mean,
1:01:39
it's as the not much younger,
1:01:41
but more junior in career member
1:01:43
of this team. these two women,
1:01:45
Dr. Dair Cass and Esther Chu,
1:01:47
are the two who got me
1:01:49
involved in this work in the
1:01:51
first place and have taken me
1:01:53
hand in hand through everything I've
1:01:55
learned about it and I am
1:01:57
forever grateful to them. Honestly, it's...
1:01:59
It's literally too hard to pick
1:02:01
anybody specific because, you know, I
1:02:04
have a role in resident education.
1:02:06
And so I do a lot
1:02:08
of work with just so many
1:02:10
young and enthusiastic and brilliant people. And
1:02:12
so if I started naming names, I
1:02:14
would forget names and I would just
1:02:17
feel bad. So what I want to
1:02:19
say is I have had these amazing
1:02:21
residents and I have had even just,
1:02:23
you know, one off mentorship meetings with
1:02:26
people who come to me for a
1:02:28
specific goal. One of the things I'm
1:02:30
really excited about with feminine 2.0
1:02:32
is that all of these people
1:02:34
that over the last few years
1:02:36
I have had these little relationships
1:02:38
with or longer relationships with are
1:02:40
going to find a home again
1:02:42
in a bigger tent where they're
1:02:44
going to learn from each other,
1:02:46
grow from each other, find new
1:02:49
mentors, find longer term mentorship, then
1:02:51
I have been able to provide
1:02:53
on my own while feminine was
1:02:55
on life support. this is going to
1:02:57
be a major catalyst for good and for
1:02:59
change in our specialty. I think it's really
1:03:01
smart about some of the educational
1:03:03
programs that we're putting in place too.
1:03:05
And this will lead next to your
1:03:07
next question because we're about to talk
1:03:09
about champions of change. But one thing
1:03:11
that program is doing that I think
1:03:13
is so savvy is they're not just
1:03:15
measuring what do you learn in these
1:03:18
medical student educational programs, but also
1:03:20
what impact does it have? on your
1:03:22
well-being as a professional and on
1:03:24
your burnout scores? Because obviously we're
1:03:26
one of the top burnout specialties,
1:03:28
at least here in the emergency
1:03:30
department. Is it the same? I'm
1:03:32
here in the US. Is this
1:03:34
the same in Canada? Are you
1:03:36
also the top? It's the third year in
1:03:38
a row for emergency physicians to report some
1:03:41
level of burnout. compared to all other specialties
1:03:43
and Canada is also very high. I don't
1:03:45
know if they're the number one, but you're
1:03:47
number one down in the US. We're number
1:03:49
one. Yeah, and I think a lot of
1:03:51
it has to do with our problems are
1:03:54
ones that we're told that we can do
1:03:56
nothing about. You know, at least that's what,
1:03:58
you know, constantly we're told nothing. can be
1:04:00
done about the burning issue, about the
1:04:02
boarding issue, nothing can be done about
1:04:04
the lack of resources and things like
1:04:06
that. But when we give people something
1:04:09
that is meaningful, that actually promises to
1:04:11
move the specialty and provide better care
1:04:13
for patients, what does that do to
1:04:15
that actually to your mental health and
1:04:17
to the course of your entire career?
1:04:19
That's actually the kind of ambitious goals
1:04:21
we have with our... educational programs, but
1:04:23
I'll leave that for dare to explain
1:04:25
a little bit more. Yeah, I mean,
1:04:27
you're like, we're both taking Ken's questions
1:04:30
from him. So basically we ask you,
1:04:32
Ken. Do you have any other questions
1:04:34
for us? I was just going to
1:04:36
make a comment that, you know, you
1:04:38
can't keep the world warm by setting
1:04:40
yourself on fire, and that's something I
1:04:42
had to learn. And so from a
1:04:44
burnout perspective, that was a good friend
1:04:46
of mine from the UK told me
1:04:49
that. Question number five, and this is
1:04:51
about Champions of Change, I would make
1:04:53
a friendly amendment and tell you to
1:04:55
call it Super Shiroz, but Champions of
1:04:57
Change is the program that you're going
1:04:59
to do. It's an exciting initiative targeting
1:05:01
medical students. So how do you envision
1:05:03
this program shaping the next generation, the
1:05:05
future, the people that are going to
1:05:08
be taking care of me as I
1:05:10
approach 60 here, you know, and advocate
1:05:12
for systemic change? So this actually, so
1:05:14
it's still going to be called Champions
1:05:16
of Change. We take your suggestion kindly
1:05:18
and we, it's under advisement, okay. But
1:05:20
the whole idea of this program, I
1:05:22
think, it grew out of the idea
1:05:24
that, you know, it's, and again, like,
1:05:27
it's launching January 20th, and I don't
1:05:29
know how much you know about what
1:05:31
that date will mean in the domestic
1:05:33
architecture, but here in the United States,
1:05:35
we're hitting into a time where a
1:05:37
lot of people are going to feel
1:05:39
disempowered as empowered as building future public
1:05:41
health and medical students, a lot of
1:05:43
them are going to really need a
1:05:46
place to land to think about how
1:05:48
do I understand how to make a
1:05:50
system better. And so one of our
1:05:52
colleagues, again, like there's a big team
1:05:54
in Emory, had been on the board
1:05:56
of medical students for choice for a
1:05:58
long time and knew a lot about
1:06:00
medical student, change management, but really felt
1:06:02
that there was a gap in the
1:06:05
landscape of access to teaching medical students
1:06:07
about how to be change agents at
1:06:09
their institution and what does it mean
1:06:11
to know how to change medical school,
1:06:13
a curriculum, you know, to be part
1:06:15
of policy change, to understand health systems
1:06:17
at your state level, federally, whatever it
1:06:19
is. And so she envisioned this program
1:06:21
for medical students that's a curriculum that's
1:06:24
six months long. It's open to any
1:06:26
medical student in, you know. domestically or
1:06:28
internationally inferior, although I think we're going
1:06:30
to focus on domestic to start because
1:06:32
again, you can't be everything to everyone
1:06:34
all the time, but Canadian medical students
1:06:37
we might make an exception for. That's
1:06:39
for you, Ken. But it's really, it's open
1:06:41
curriculum, it's an open program and it's basically
1:06:43
rooted in the idea that before you get
1:06:45
frustrated at the system that you cannot change, let's
1:06:47
teach you how to be an agent of change.
1:06:49
And we're going to talk a little bit about
1:06:51
reproductive health care, like that's going to be the
1:06:54
case. base that we're going to use for this
1:06:56
conversation. But it can be used on anything, right?
1:06:58
So if you find, if you're somebody that wants
1:07:00
to change public health in another way, so let's
1:07:02
say you want to be a substance use disorder,
1:07:05
or you want to worry about gun violence, or
1:07:07
if you want to talk about, you know, operations,
1:07:09
or whatever it is, you will learn those skills
1:07:11
in this. in this course and it's open to
1:07:13
medical students. It will start January 20th. It
1:07:16
will run for six months. There
1:07:18
will be a curriculum of lectures
1:07:20
that are virtual and then there
1:07:22
will be group organization and research
1:07:24
mentorship and the goal is really
1:07:26
to catch medical students before they're
1:07:28
falling and figure out if being
1:07:31
in a community of change makers
1:07:33
and learning skills that then allow
1:07:35
you to move forward with purpose
1:07:37
will. buffer the anxiety and burnout that
1:07:39
we are already seeing with both
1:07:41
medical students, obviously residents and physicians,
1:07:43
but getting to get them early.
1:07:46
So, you know, the idea of
1:07:48
a career development program that does
1:07:50
use reproductive health care knowledge as
1:07:52
its clinical case, but really is
1:07:54
about the longevity for medical students,
1:07:56
not only for women medical students,
1:07:58
for all medical students. kind
1:08:00
of exactly where we want to be
1:08:02
in feminine 2.0, right? So it was
1:08:04
this wonderful program to launch the day
1:08:06
the website goes live. So remember, feminine.org
1:08:09
will go live January 20th. It won't
1:08:11
be perfect. It's been a quick turnaround.
1:08:13
So it will have been less than
1:08:15
six weeks from the time we decided
1:08:17
to do this to time the website
1:08:19
will go live. And if you know
1:08:21
anything about website design, that's a really,
1:08:24
even just for that project, it's very
1:08:26
quick. It's very quick. But. The website
1:08:28
will go live. There will be resources
1:08:30
on it. There will be ways to
1:08:32
engage. You'll understand more about, you know,
1:08:34
how do you want to be part
1:08:37
of the group that works on programmatic
1:08:39
development? Or do you want to be
1:08:41
part of the group that works on
1:08:43
the best practices for women in medicine
1:08:45
and the employment best practices? Do you
1:08:47
want to help decide what? search criteria,
1:08:50
would you want to look for in
1:08:52
a job, right? So if you're looking
1:08:54
for a new job, would you want
1:08:56
to know more about flexible scheduling or
1:08:58
the night's policy or a differential for
1:09:00
nocturnists or the local school district or
1:09:03
maybe you want to know about the
1:09:05
night life? Like I don't want to
1:09:07
tell people what they want to know.
1:09:09
I just want to know what they
1:09:11
want to know. And so how do
1:09:13
you want to engage with this team
1:09:15
to inform the work that we're doing
1:09:18
going forward? Stay tuned, I guess, is
1:09:20
what it comes down to, because I
1:09:22
think that we're very excited to be
1:09:24
doing this. If you had asked me
1:09:26
six months ago, if this is how
1:09:28
I'd be opening 2025, true, I would
1:09:31
have told, if you had told me,
1:09:33
right, I would have said, you're crazy.
1:09:35
This is not how I expected to
1:09:37
open 2025. That's a surprise, for sure.
1:09:39
to live in interesting times. I really
1:09:41
wish there was that champions of change
1:09:44
program. When I was a medical student,
1:09:46
I could have learned so much because
1:09:48
for the longest time I'm like, oh
1:09:50
well, here's a paper, therefore, right? And
1:09:52
that's not how change happens. And I've
1:09:54
had to learn that out in the
1:09:56
field. And certainly my NBA has helped
1:09:59
me with that. I think that is
1:10:01
so important for medical students to learn
1:10:03
how to navigate the system and
1:10:05
nudge it and change it for
1:10:07
the better and for the better
1:10:09
both for the health care they're
1:10:11
providing patients but also for their
1:10:13
own longevity and practice and things
1:10:15
like that. And I'm just going
1:10:17
to come out and say it.
1:10:19
You guys. the two of you
1:10:21
have been real champions to me
1:10:23
and I've learned so much from
1:10:25
being associated with this program in
1:10:27
the periphery and you know I
1:10:29
follow the content and I listen
1:10:31
to you because you've taught me so
1:10:34
much so I really appreciate
1:10:36
it and again we really
1:10:38
we want to remind anyone
1:10:40
listening that we're getting old like I
1:10:42
mean it I'm the oldest one on
1:10:44
this call I know but like
1:10:46
you know It's really important that
1:10:49
this new, this new iteration, whatever,
1:10:51
feminine point 2.0, it has a
1:10:53
generational lift. It is bringing in
1:10:55
more voices that are younger, it
1:10:57
is inclusive, it is dynamic, it
1:10:59
is better than it was. I
1:11:01
mean, the lessons we've learned from
1:11:03
the first time are real, and
1:11:05
they're a little painful, to be honest.
1:11:07
I mean, you do the best you can,
1:11:09
and then you admit when you weren't
1:11:11
perfect. I feel like that has to
1:11:13
be part of this, like we are
1:11:16
learning too. And there are things that
1:11:18
I look back on and say, I
1:11:20
don't want to say I would have
1:11:22
moved slower, but I definitely could have,
1:11:24
there are definitely times that we could
1:11:26
have done things differently or, and so
1:11:28
I think that the gap in time
1:11:30
was good for us, right, because it
1:11:32
gave us a chance to like look
1:11:34
back and take a deep breath and
1:11:36
kind of learn from what we did.
1:11:38
And yet we're going to make mistakes
1:11:40
again. But I don't I hope nobody's looking
1:11:43
for perfection because if they are then
1:11:45
they're suffering from a potential nirvana fallacy
1:11:47
And unless it's perfect we can't do
1:11:49
it and it doesn't need to be
1:11:51
perfect It needs to be sufficient. It
1:11:53
needs to be enough and we can
1:11:55
have that iterative open mindset that we're
1:11:57
constantly changing and improving for the better
1:11:59
So I'm not going to sit there
1:12:02
and go on feminine.org on January 20th
1:12:04
and start criticizing parts of the website
1:12:06
that may not be perfect. I'm just
1:12:08
happy that you're relaunching it because it's
1:12:10
clear that feminine 2.0 is more than
1:12:13
just a relaunch. It's a movement towards
1:12:15
lasting change in our world of emergency
1:12:17
medicine and in the House of Medicine.
1:12:19
And so I really want to thank
1:12:21
you for sharing your journey with us
1:12:24
before we wrap up though. You know,
1:12:26
it's always good to have a call
1:12:28
to action at the end of something.
1:12:30
And so there's three of you. I'm
1:12:32
going to ask each one of you
1:12:35
to give me one call to action.
1:12:37
So I'll start with Dara. What's your
1:12:39
call to action? My call to action
1:12:41
is to go to the website on
1:12:43
January 20th and look at it and
1:12:46
take in what's there and feel free
1:12:48
to send us notes and feedback, sign
1:12:50
up for the newsletter again, be part
1:12:52
of the community. This only will work
1:12:54
if we do it. really just like
1:12:57
share it, amplify it, be part of
1:12:59
this, all the things because again, like,
1:13:01
the thing that's magic is the number
1:13:03
of people that have done this with
1:13:05
us in the past, that have done
1:13:08
it together in the past. Honestly, part
1:13:10
of the magic is how much of
1:13:12
it stayed alive when we stopped, right?
1:13:14
How many women in medicine organizations were
1:13:16
called to them? And how many times
1:13:19
you posted in the Facebook group? I
1:13:21
was like, Ken's still out there, Ken
1:13:23
still doing it. I'm still. you know
1:13:25
in the bureaucracy of the federal government
1:13:27
I can't do anything but on the
1:13:29
Facebook group I got a notification Ken
1:13:32
posted again and so I just want
1:13:34
to say like you know there's a
1:13:36
the energy and the vitality that we
1:13:38
gave to each other and again not
1:13:40
we like we the real royal way
1:13:43
That is the first thing that I
1:13:45
think we want to capture is bringing
1:13:47
everyone back in. We put up a
1:13:49
form randomly in one Facebook group and
1:13:51
we have like 200 people that wrote
1:13:54
in saying they want to be part
1:13:56
of whatever is going on. But that's
1:13:58
a fraction of who's out there, right?
1:14:00
So like please just like share it,
1:14:02
show it, think about it, feedback. say
1:14:05
what's missing, tell what you want to
1:14:07
do, but be part of this because
1:14:09
that's the only way that it is
1:14:11
what it needs to be, which is
1:14:13
something. Please engage as best as you
1:14:16
can. That's my big call to action.
1:14:18
Dr. Chu, what would you like to
1:14:20
see? I mean, mine will be a
1:14:22
little bit about researching data, but I
1:14:24
think we are really committed to filling
1:14:27
in the blanks for people, whether there
1:14:29
are clinical gaps, understanding about policies and
1:14:31
law, or just the scope. of what
1:14:33
we're facing. And I think, I mean,
1:14:35
from a, you know, from a policy
1:14:38
and health services landscape. So I think
1:14:40
the best thing we can ask of
1:14:42
people is their curiosity. You know, so
1:14:44
if you come to the website, take
1:14:46
a look at things or just engage
1:14:49
with this topic at all questions that
1:14:51
have to do with reproductive health care
1:14:53
and emergency medicine, simple emails. or messages
1:14:55
through the website. Those are things that
1:14:57
we really absorb and think about. And
1:15:00
it's kind of like a lot like
1:15:02
calling your Congressperson, so they know what
1:15:04
matters to their constituency. It's like every
1:15:06
message we get helps drive our mission,
1:15:08
our vision, and the work that we
1:15:11
do. So I think just any sort
1:15:13
of reach out and sharing what's on
1:15:15
your mind and what you wonder about
1:15:17
is super helpful to us. So your
1:15:19
call to action then would be to
1:15:22
be curious and then have that curiosity
1:15:24
Sent to you through the website so
1:15:26
that loud. Yes. Yes. Be curious out
1:15:28
loud not just sit there and stare
1:15:30
at your naval and say I'm really
1:15:33
curious about this How how should I
1:15:35
go about answering this question? Go to
1:15:37
the website go to feminine.org and start
1:15:39
asking questions and stuff like that and
1:15:41
Jenny. What's your call to action? I
1:15:44
think for me it would be to
1:15:46
make sure you tell your friends. I
1:15:48
think that there are women in medicine
1:15:50
groups and groups under the auspices of
1:15:52
a feminine group in emergency medicine residences
1:15:55
and medical schools all across at least
1:15:57
this country and maybe other countries. And
1:15:59
you need to spread the word that
1:16:01
things are coming back. We are back,
1:16:03
we are back with a newer, bolder,
1:16:06
broader mission statement and we want everybody
1:16:08
involved, no matter what your gender identity.
1:16:10
So you're like putting the
1:16:12
band back together and going
1:16:14
on a road tour? That is
1:16:16
exactly what it felt like on
1:16:18
our first group call. I was like,
1:16:20
the band is back together. Well,
1:16:23
it's clear to me that Faminem 2.0
1:16:25
is your fight song. Yes, it is
1:16:27
your fight song. So, um... Great, the
1:16:29
SGM will be back next episode with
1:16:32
a structured critical appraisal of a recent
1:16:34
publication. We here at the SGM will
1:16:36
continue to try to cut the KT
1:16:38
window down. That's the knowledge translation window
1:16:41
down from over 10 years to less
1:16:43
than one year using the power of
1:16:45
social media. And ultimately we want to
1:16:47
see patients get the best care based
1:16:49
on the best evidence. To finish the show,
1:16:52
and because I have three guest skeptics, I'm
1:16:54
going to ask each one of you
1:16:56
to read part. of the S gem
1:16:58
tagline. It'll go, Dara Esther Jenny.
1:17:00
You're ready? What's the tagline?
1:17:02
Remember to be skeptical of
1:17:05
anything you learn. Even if
1:17:07
you heard it on the,
1:17:09
Skeptic's Guide to Emergency Medicine.
1:17:11
Talk to everyone next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More