SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

Released Saturday, 18th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

SGEM Xtra: This is My Fight Song – FeminEM 2.0

Saturday, 18th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

Welcome to the Skeptics

0:06

Guide to Emergency Medicine.

0:09

Meet them, Greet them,

0:11

treat them, and street

0:14

them. Today's date is

0:16

January 7th 2025 and

0:19

I'm your skeptical host

0:21

Ken Milne. The title of

0:24

today's podcast is This

0:26

is Our Fight Song.

0:28

Feminim 2.0. And we have

0:31

not one. Not two. But

0:33

three. guest skeptics for this

0:35

super S gem extra. So the first

0:37

guest skeptic is Dr. Dara

0:40

Cass. She is an emergency

0:42

medicine physician, public health leader

0:44

and advocate passionate about equity

0:46

and health care reform. She

0:48

founded Feminem, promoting gender

0:51

equity in emergency medicine and

0:53

champions organ donation reform after

0:56

donating part of her own

0:58

liver to her youngest son. Dr.

1:00

Cass is dedicated to expanding

1:03

reproductive health care access and

1:05

educating the public on health

1:07

care policy. A mother of

1:09

three, she combines her commitment

1:11

to medicine, advocacy, and equity

1:13

to create meaningful change. Welcome

1:16

back to the SGM, Dara. Thank

1:18

you for having me back, Dr. Milne.

1:20

Oh, oh, come on, Dara, it's Ken, and I

1:22

love having you on. I've had you on,

1:24

I think a couple of times. I mean,

1:26

it goes back like... to some of the

1:29

early days, it was 2017, when I came

1:31

out and I said, hey, there's this new

1:33

group coming up, feminine, and I looked into

1:35

it, and by December I'm like, you know

1:37

what, 2017 is the year of feminine. You

1:40

did declare that, and I think that we

1:42

did have a very good year that year.

1:44

I can't say it was because of you,

1:46

but I can certainly say they both happened

1:48

at the same. I don't want to over

1:50

interpret the data, but I would say that

1:53

we did have a good year in 2017.

1:55

Correlation is not causation right but

1:57

you were kind enough to invite me

2:00

to present at your 2019 female idea

2:02

exchange conference in New York City. So

2:04

that was 2019, Dr. Jen Gunter was

2:06

there, she was launching a book, my

2:08

wife Barb came down and it was

2:11

just an amazing trip to New York

2:13

City and to be in that room

2:15

with about five, no, I think it

2:17

was like 800 women and I've done

2:19

a lot of speaking, I must admit.

2:21

I was very nervous getting up on

2:23

that stage presenting in front of those

2:26

women talking about the evidence behind gender

2:28

inequity in the House of Medicine. It

2:30

was great to have you. I will

2:32

say that the feminine conferences and we'll

2:34

talk a little bit about them I

2:36

think as we go on were magic.

2:39

I still hold that they were one

2:41

of the most amazing things we did

2:43

and we hadn't expected to do them

2:45

year over year. Lots of reasons we'll

2:47

talk about why they stopped, but having

2:49

you there was very special. The feeling

2:52

of running those conferences and seeing the

2:54

interpersonal like dynamics and the speakers and

2:56

the participants and just the energy in

2:58

the room is something that I think

3:00

I still carry with me when I

3:02

have challenging days because it was just

3:05

magic as the only word we ever

3:07

use. It's always funny what you remember

3:09

from these things. I remember three things.

3:11

One, we arrived and Barb lost her

3:13

luggage. I shouldn't say Barb lost her

3:15

luggage, but the airline lost her luggage.

3:18

So we went on a shopping trip

3:20

through New York City, which was fabulous

3:22

for her. And then when I came

3:24

to present, I was really nervous, like

3:26

I said, and my bladder was like,

3:28

oh my God, I got a pee,

3:31

I got a pee, I got a

3:33

pee, I got a pee. And they

3:35

had changed all the bathrooms on that.

3:37

had to run down, oh my god

3:39

I'm on in five minutes, and I

3:41

had to run downstairs and use another

3:43

bathroom because all the bathrooms are changed.

3:46

So that was the second thing I

3:48

remember, again, weird. And the third thing

3:50

is we had all these capes, these

3:52

purple capes that said fix 19, and

3:54

all these presenters wearing these capes, looking

3:56

like superheroes of medicine. That was the

3:59

image that was left with me. I

4:01

loved it. So I will just say one

4:03

thing. The first conference we had, which

4:05

was fixed 17, we actually took all

4:07

the bathrooms in the venue and made

4:09

them gender neutral and was interesting because

4:11

we had about a dozen men joined

4:13

that first conference and there was no

4:16

man's bathroom. It was just gender neutral

4:18

bathrooms for everybody. And I remember that

4:20

that first day, one of the guys

4:22

that was at the conference and these

4:24

were all champions of gender equity, you

4:26

know, had thought about things from a

4:28

very equitable perspective. standing in line for

4:31

the bathroom behind 20 women because every

4:33

bathroom is gender neutral was one of

4:35

the first introductions into what it's like

4:37

to walk in the shoes of somebody

4:40

that you don't think about you know

4:42

having different experiences. So gender neutral bathrooms

4:44

are great at every conference. I'd advocate

4:46

for them across the board for lots

4:49

of reasons, but I would say turning

4:51

the bathrooms into gender neutral conferences at

4:53

the first conference was a really good

4:55

lesson in gender equity that I had

4:58

not anticipated teaching a few good men.

5:00

So much to learn. All right and

5:02

our next guest skeptic is Dr. Esther

5:04

Chu Now she just goes by a

5:06

single name because she is a rock

5:09

star We're just going to call her

5:11

Chu and I'm waiting for her evolution

5:13

to be like Prince. She'll be the

5:15

the the emergency physician formerly known as

5:18

Chu and she'll just be represented by

5:20

a symbol She is an emergency physician

5:22

and professor at the Oregon Health and

5:24

Science University. She's a popular science communicator

5:27

who has used social media to talk

5:29

about racism and Sexism in Health Care.

5:31

Welcome back to the S gem, Esther

5:34

Chu. Have I also been on the S

5:36

gem? Yes, you've been on twice.

5:38

I had you on once in 2019,

5:40

and the show was, she works hard

5:42

for the money. And the other one

5:45

was, an S gem extra about being

5:47

stronger together, and that was in 2017.

5:49

That sounds right. I think that's

5:51

when we did together. Well, it's

5:54

good to be back. And so our

5:56

third guest skeptic on this S

5:58

gem extra is Dr. Jenny Beck-Esmay.

6:00

She is an associate professor of

6:02

emergency medicine and assistant residency director

6:05

at Mount Sinai, Morningside, and Mount

6:07

Sinai West in New York City.

6:09

And she is passionate about emergency

6:11

medicine education and gender equity in

6:13

medicine and has proud to have

6:15

contributed content to numerous foam ed

6:18

resources like feminine, rebel EM and

6:20

EM docs. Welcome to the ESGEM

6:22

Jenny. Thank you. I'm so excited

6:24

to be here. Well, this is

6:26

your first time on the SJEM,

6:28

and I'm surprised that I'm saying

6:30

that, because we'll need to make

6:33

sure it's not your last time

6:35

on the SJEM. I'm a little

6:37

shocked as well. You and I

6:39

go way back now to some

6:41

of my earliest roots in the

6:43

FOMAD universe, and I'm surprised this

6:46

is my first time visiting you

6:48

in Canada. Well, we are going

6:50

to rectify that today, and moving

6:52

forward. Excellent! This is an SGM

6:54

Extra where we bring you special

6:56

episodes that highlight important topics in

6:58

emergency medicine. Today, we've invited these

7:01

three amazing people to discuss the

7:03

relaunch of females in emergency medicine

7:05

or feminine 2.0 initiative. And yeah,

7:07

it was it was a long

7:09

time ago that we spoke and

7:11

feminems was making waves about empowering

7:14

women emergency medicine and fostering this

7:16

conversation about gender equity. So let's

7:18

do a little time travel forward.

7:20

Do do, do, do, do, do,

7:22

do. Here we are in 2025

7:24

and feminine is back. better than

7:26

ever with a renewed energy and

7:29

a clear mission. So before we

7:31

dive into relaunching Feminim 2.0, what

7:33

the heck of you three been

7:35

up to over the last few

7:37

years because I'm sure there's some

7:39

interesting backstory. We'll start with you,

7:42

Dara. So what have I been

7:44

doing? Okay, well, the last time

7:46

we met in 2019 at the

7:48

conference, there was a virus that

7:50

circulated around the United States and

7:52

I hear it went through the

7:54

rest of the world as well.

7:57

I don't know. C

7:59

time before COVID. Seriously.

8:03

So obviously, all of

8:05

us got through the COVID experience

8:07

and in many different ways. And thank

8:09

God, most of us survived, although we do

8:11

need to remember that not everybody did. But

8:13

at the end of the day,

8:15

we all kind of kept working

8:17

in the ER and started thinking

8:19

about what was next. So

8:21

for me, the thing

8:24

I did in 2021 really

8:26

did also change the

8:28

course of Feminine, which was that

8:30

I went to go work for the Biden

8:32

-Harris Administration as a regional director in the

8:34

Department of Health and Human Services, which

8:36

was an incredible honor to be a presidential

8:38

appointee after especially the experience we had

8:40

with COVID. But also really gave me a

8:42

chance to integrate a lot of my

8:44

experiences as a clinical emergency physician and also

8:46

think about policy changes that had to

8:48

happen at the national level. The

8:50

really important factor for anybody

8:52

out there thinking about becoming

8:54

a presidential appointee, regardless of

8:56

the president, is you cannot

8:58

own or run a health

9:00

care organization if you work

9:03

for the administration as an

9:05

appointee. So as one of

9:07

the conditions of my employment, I

9:09

had to transfer ownership and all

9:12

activities of Feminine to Jenny, back

9:14

as May. She'll talk about

9:16

that in a second. But really,

9:18

that was the reason that

9:20

Feminine hibernated was that because of

9:22

my job in the federal

9:24

government, I could not either help

9:26

make decisions for Feminine, help

9:28

organize the conferences. And all of

9:30

us got very busy basically

9:32

keeping ourselves together. I also moved

9:34

from Brooklyn to Scarstale, which

9:36

is very exciting for me. Have

9:38

a new house, have fun

9:40

like that. And I have a couple

9:42

of kids. Actually, I have three. I need to

9:45

keep track of all of them. I have three

9:47

kids. And so now my daughter is about to

9:49

go to college. My son is a freshman in

9:51

high school and my other son is in seventh

9:53

grade. So it's busy times, but I am really

9:55

excited about the relaunch of Feminine and I'm really

9:57

excited to talk about what we're going to do

9:59

next. Isn't it amazing how

10:01

life just happens? So many life

10:03

events. I mean, you changed jobs,

10:05

you got through a pandemic, you

10:07

moved, I mean, wow. I mean,

10:10

I think there's a stress scale

10:12

out there about, you know, changing

10:14

jobs, health, you know, all of

10:16

those types of things. And you're

10:18

hitting a lot of the top

10:20

five right there. So good on

10:22

you for coming out of this

10:24

so successfully. But we need to

10:26

move on. Yeah, let's move on

10:28

to Esther because I want to

10:30

Esther, Well, it's a good question.

10:33

I'm not exactly sure what I

10:35

have been doing, but there was,

10:37

likewise, I also experience a pandemic,

10:39

strangely enough, and all the things

10:41

associated with that, a lot of

10:43

public health work, I would say.

10:45

And then in my day job,

10:47

other than being in the emergency

10:49

department, I am a health services

10:51

researcher. So I study health policy,

10:54

impact on health services of a

10:56

variety of things, but mostly focused

10:58

around opioid and cannabis use. And

11:00

so that. job has been very

11:02

busy and actually drifts a lot

11:04

over to what is happening in

11:06

health policy and health services related

11:08

to reproductive health. So I think

11:10

there's lots that's complementary and that

11:12

is what we're talking about today

11:15

because I think this is probably

11:17

the most significant and dramatic shift

11:19

in health care delivery that we've

11:21

seen in a while and understanding

11:23

its impact in emergency medicine. I

11:25

think is the first step, so

11:27

that we can best support our

11:29

workforce and know how to move

11:31

forward. Well, I'll have to make

11:33

a mental note about the opioid

11:35

use disorder stuff because our December,

11:38

hot off the press episode from

11:40

Academic Emergency Medicine, was about compassion

11:42

and the compassion that providers have.

11:44

and the perceived stigma that the

11:46

people with substance use disorder had.

11:48

And I thought it was a

11:50

really good topic and an excellent

11:52

discussion about the whole area of

11:54

substance use disorder and some of

11:56

the biases and stigma that we

11:59

can bring into that relationship. up

12:01

as providers and health care clinicians.

12:03

So I'm hoping I can pick

12:05

your brain later about it, but

12:07

that's about what we're here. Yeah, that'd

12:10

be great. Jenny, your turn. What

12:12

have you been up to for

12:14

the last five years? Of course,

12:16

besides doing CPR on feminine and

12:18

keeping it alive. I did keep

12:20

feminine on life support for

12:23

the last few years despite

12:25

Darrow's best efforts to kill it.

12:27

Did it have a DNR on it

12:29

or what a DNI? Yeah, you know I

12:31

every time I would try and give up

12:34

feminine to someone else or

12:36

consider selling it or consider

12:38

just you know putting it into a

12:41

grave, I thought back to all these

12:43

wonderful experiences that we had, including some

12:45

with you can at the feminine ID

12:47

exchange, and I just couldn't do it.

12:49

I just felt like there is something

12:51

there and I know that there will

12:53

be a time. later if it's my

12:55

if it's my time or dare is

12:58

time again where there's going to be

13:00

a reason for this to still exist

13:02

so I just kind of kept it

13:04

alive barely in the background because I

13:06

was quite busy you know as the

13:09

other two mentioned we did go through

13:11

this thing called a pandemic and

13:13

it took a lot of our time and

13:15

our energy and a lot of us had

13:17

to do a lot of self-care to get

13:20

through that in addition during that I had

13:22

a baby who's now three. And so I

13:24

have been doing all of the things

13:26

that come with early years of motherhood,

13:29

pregnancy and motherhood in the last few

13:31

years, well, feminine has been on life

13:33

support. So it's been a wonderful ride,

13:36

but I am very excited that now

13:38

that my kid is entering her preschool

13:40

years, feminine is back and I have

13:42

some time to spend with it again.

13:45

There's just something so special about

13:47

feminine. You could feel it back

13:49

2017, 2018, 2019. Something really great.

13:52

So I'm glad that you kept

13:54

it on life support and you

13:56

did not terminate or pull the

13:58

plug on it because... It's too

14:00

good. It's too good to give up on.

14:02

I just couldn't do it. You've brought us

14:05

up to speed. We're at 2025. I've

14:07

got my favorite number of questions

14:09

to ask you. That's right. Five.

14:11

And so each of you can respond

14:13

to any of the questions. You can

14:15

all respond. You can not respond. But

14:18

we're just going to go through this

14:20

list of five. And we're going to

14:22

start with the very first and most

14:24

obvious question. Why are you relaunching

14:27

feminine feminine? So I'll

14:29

start with that one. So when I

14:31

left the federal government and feminine was

14:33

hibernating, I really had to sit with

14:35

what was its purpose anymore and more

14:38

importantly, how is it going to exist?

14:40

So we don't always like to talk

14:42

about the financial viability of organizations and

14:44

the ability to support staff and time

14:46

and bookkeepers and accountants and all the

14:48

things, but. When feminine 1.0 existed,

14:50

we ran it very much like

14:53

a glass door model, which is

14:55

an employment-based model that where employers

14:58

supported the work we were doing

15:00

around the idea that a viable

15:02

workforce in emergency medicine was really

15:05

important to employers. The pandemic taught

15:07

us a lot and has really opened

15:10

a lot of our eyes into how

15:12

much of an investment certain groups and

15:14

certain organizations want to make in our

15:17

workforce. And it was clear to me

15:19

that that was not a strategy, a

15:21

fiscal strategy that would be at least

15:24

immediately possible, especially given the fact that,

15:26

you know, we were still dealing with

15:28

like, you know, COVID backlash. Our physicians

15:31

are overworked and underpaid. And so going

15:33

back to physician employers and asking them

15:35

to support an organization, while we know that

15:37

physician salaries are going down and we're working

15:40

harder than ever before, did not feel like

15:42

the right. strategy. So I kind of sat

15:44

with it for about six or eight months

15:46

and didn't know. And then as the reproductive

15:49

health care policies around the country started

15:51

really kind of getting embedded and we

15:54

realize that many physicians are practicing medicine

15:56

state by state in a way that

15:58

we've never seen before. No other practice

16:00

of medicine has seen this level of

16:03

disconnect. What happens in one state versus

16:05

a neighboring state? And Estrasees is almost

16:07

daily in Oregon versus Idaho. You know,

16:09

what does it look like to take

16:11

care of a patient? There is a

16:14

real need to galvanize and support the

16:16

emergency medicine community around the care of

16:18

reproductive health care patients and also still

16:20

support women physicians in emergency medicine. And

16:22

so it really kind of dawns on

16:25

me after doing some consulting work. for

16:27

six or eight months after I left

16:29

the federal government, that there was an

16:31

opportunity to marry those two missions, to

16:33

take the work we had done on

16:36

gender equity in the workplace, and also

16:38

as a nonprofit, right, which is not

16:40

how feminine had started because I was

16:42

using the revenue stream from employers to

16:44

facilitate the work we were doing, actually

16:47

to form it as a nonprofit and

16:49

have grant funding to support the care

16:51

of patients in emergency medicine. starting with

16:53

reproductive health care, but really expanding for

16:56

as much as we we find grants

16:58

and we think about the work we're

17:00

doing, because that is where the need

17:02

is, right? So one of the things

17:04

we've seen over the past couple of

17:07

years, and again, this is a very

17:09

American problem, but at the same time,

17:11

what happens on our doorstep leaves out

17:13

so many places, excuse my analogy, to

17:15

our neighboring countries and to our physicians

17:18

who go back and forth, it's really

17:20

important that we address the care of

17:22

patients in emergency medicine and the care

17:24

of the people who are taking care

17:26

of those patients. And so feminine gets

17:29

to do both in this new iteration.

17:31

We're going to launch with the same

17:33

website. So it's the same address, right?

17:35

It's still feminine.org, but it will be

17:37

a brand new website with a lot

17:40

deeper resources. So deeper resources on policies

17:42

and protocols on. employment for women in

17:44

medicine, but also on reproductive health care

17:46

delivery at topic pregnancy, you know, miscarriage

17:49

management. What does it look like to

17:51

start contraception? What does it look like?

17:53

to have a

17:55

library of resources so

17:57

making sure that

18:00

we have a well

18:02

curated research library

18:04

of important articles around

18:06

both gender equity and

18:08

medicine and professional development of women

18:10

and also the care of

18:13

patients in regards to reproductive health

18:15

care. So really serving as

18:17

a resource for our community and

18:19

bringing everybody back together

18:21

having some development programs on

18:23

women and medicine groups also state

18:25

-based policy groups so if you're

18:28

practicing emergency medicine in a

18:30

state like Idaho getting together all

18:32

of those physicians who care for

18:34

patients in Idaho not just women

18:36

physicians and making sure that we

18:38

share best practices and policies across

18:40

the state like Idaho or Tennessee

18:42

where it has become confusing sometimes

18:45

to practice emergency medicine especially with

18:47

things like the mtala decision

18:49

which you know we are speaking

18:51

a little bit freely about

18:53

but you know the mtala the

18:55

decision about where mtala applies

18:57

to emergency patients um is not

18:59

something that many of us

19:01

thought five years ago. Not

19:04

everybody will know what mtala is so if

19:06

you could just expand just a tiny

19:08

bit for our non -americans. Yeah

19:10

so mtala Escherche

19:12

why don't you take it from here? Do you

19:14

want to take it from here or do

19:16

you want me to keep going? No keep going

19:18

keep going because I'm I'm next and I'll

19:20

jump in as I need to. So mtala is

19:22

the Emergency Medicine Treatment and Labor Act was

19:24

passed in the 1980s to make sure that all

19:26

patients in American emergency departments got care at the

19:28

door stabilized regardless of their ability to

19:30

pay and what has happened and this

19:32

has been a real kind of foundation

19:34

of what emergency medicine is in the

19:37

United States we take care of patients

19:39

first and foremost we do not ask

19:41

them for their insurance or their checkbook

19:43

or their credit card at the door

19:45

it was obviously passed to take care

19:47

of the most vulnerable patients amongst us

19:49

these were originally low -income patients who

19:52

often were patients of trauma that were

19:54

being transferred from a private facility to

19:56

a public hospital and they were dying

19:58

on the way sometimes in a stretcher down

20:00

the block. And Emtala really is

20:02

the foundation of what it means

20:04

to take care of anyone, any

20:07

place, any time, regardless of their

20:09

ability to pay. And in the

20:11

United States right now, there is

20:13

a question about whether or not

20:15

the care that somebody might need

20:17

in an emergency, if it includes

20:19

a termination of a pregnancy, would

20:21

be protected under Emtala. And I

20:23

say that as we talk about

20:25

Idaho, Idaho, because it is the

20:27

Idaho solicitor general that brought this

20:29

to the United States Supreme Court.

20:32

And so when you are practicing

20:34

emergency medicine in Idaho, you may

20:36

be transferring patients out to a

20:38

neighboring state for emergency care. Yes,

20:40

sir. The L and M tala

20:42

stands for labor. And so reproductive

20:44

rights were already embedded in that

20:46

1980s law, correct? Yes, and so

20:48

the labor part of it included

20:50

active labor. So what it really

20:52

meant was that somebody that was

20:54

presenting to a private hospital in

20:56

active labor could not be shut

20:59

to a county hospital to deliver

21:01

their baby. What has happened because

21:03

of the term labor is that

21:05

there are a lot of people

21:07

that say that that means that

21:09

no pregnancy can be terminated under

21:11

EMTALA. And so there is actually

21:13

a lot of conversation about what

21:15

does it mean to take the

21:17

original intent of EMTALA and actually

21:19

apply it to the current state.

21:21

And again, the only reason that

21:24

this all comes up is to

21:26

say that this web of confusing

21:28

litigation or confusing laws. Married with

21:30

our existing best practices in medicine,

21:32

which actually haven't changed, is one

21:34

of the reasons why feminine 2.0

21:36

as a non-profit centered on gender

21:38

equity for physicians and the care

21:40

of our patients is so important.

21:42

Because if you think about the

21:44

moral injury to physicians, not just

21:46

women physicians, but the moral injury

21:49

to providers after a pandemic like

21:51

COVID, to come back and then

21:53

now work in a state which

21:55

has changed your practice capabilities. because

21:57

you are constantly concerned about being

21:59

in a court of law to

22:01

say, I practiced the right evidence

22:03

based care. But then you've been

22:05

charged with a crime, you have

22:07

had to hire a lawyer, you

22:09

maybe take time off of work.

22:12

And we know from the data

22:14

on litigation stress, what that does

22:16

to physicians and how many physicians

22:18

will practice then defensive medicine. in

22:20

anticipation of that risk? And

22:23

what does that mean for patients?

22:25

So again, like, I just want

22:27

to frame out, the reason why

22:30

we've decided to launch Feminem 2.0

22:32

is this is a, are we

22:34

allowed to curse on your podcast?

22:36

No, I'd lose my iTunes ratings

22:38

and as a Canadian, as a

22:40

Canadian, I'd have to say Sorrier.

22:42

F-ing mess, right? And so we

22:45

are here as a community to

22:47

hold hands with each other across

22:49

emergency medicine, across other specialties to

22:51

say to our colleagues in OBG-N

22:53

and family medicine and a lot

22:55

of our rural family practice doctors,

22:57

you know, we are in community,

22:59

we are heard together. And so

23:02

that's a very long answer to

23:04

your first question, which means this

23:06

is going to be a really

23:08

long podcast. Hey, the quality of the

23:10

podcast is not depend on the length.

23:12

Is it independent of the length? And

23:14

as long as we're getting this great

23:16

high quality content, we could go all

23:18

day. But if I could summarize some

23:20

of the stuff that I've heard is

23:22

you left the Fed. There's this thing called

23:25

a glass door, which I was not

23:27

familiar with, and I thought you were

23:29

trying to make some Freudian sort of

23:31

thing to a glass ceiling to connect

23:33

it to Faminem. And then you talked

23:35

about some of these key changes that

23:38

are to come, talking about reproductive rights,

23:40

employment equity for women physicians and beyond,

23:42

and also, you know, obviously my ear

23:44

perked up when you're talking about evidence-based

23:47

protocols and evidence-based policies, and so that

23:49

everyone, no matter who they are or

23:51

how they identify, gets the best care

23:53

based on the best evidence as a

23:56

as a resource. So you're going to

23:58

be some resource for some of these,

24:00

like a repository for some of

24:02

these best practices and best evidence.

24:04

And of course, being up in

24:07

Canada, when the U.S. gets a

24:09

cold, we come down with a

24:11

life-threatening septic pneumonia because you are

24:13

very influential. Right, Jenny, we've heard a

24:15

lot from Dara about the relaunch of

24:18

feminine. I'm just wondering, what are you

24:20

looking for? What do you think

24:22

the key change that's going to

24:24

come with this reimagination or feminine 2.

24:26

To me, the key thing is

24:29

really that we're taking feminine

24:31

from an organization whose mission

24:34

statement was the support of

24:36

women practicing emergency

24:39

medicine to expanding it to

24:41

encompassing all women in emergency

24:43

medicine. So that means the

24:45

people practicing it as well

24:47

as the patients that we're

24:50

taking care of. So in

24:52

my mind, we're now kind

24:54

of siphoning off two major

24:56

parts of our organization, the

24:58

previous part that was focused

25:01

on the professional development and

25:03

the support of the practitioners,

25:05

is not going anywhere. That's

25:07

going to be alive and

25:09

well and everyone can come to

25:11

that part for everything they've grown

25:14

to love. But we're expanding it

25:16

to include this much needed portion

25:18

of the care of women patients,

25:21

female identifying patients or

25:23

patients who have female

25:25

anatomy in the emergency department

25:27

which is a very crucial thing to

25:30

be done specifically at this juncture but

25:32

probably throughout history in emergency medicine. I

25:34

love it that you're heading towards

25:37

my world more of evidence-based medicine where

25:39

you have those three pillars and you

25:41

know those two of those pillars one

25:44

is the clinician which you've been talking

25:46

about and feminine has been working on

25:48

to improve the clinician and also the

25:51

literature so that's the the other pillar

25:53

the literature that informs those clinicians but

25:55

involving and inviting and engaging with patients

25:57

exactly and asking what they value and

26:00

what they prefer. And so you're bringing

26:02

that into the organization. Well done. I

26:04

like the change. Thank you. Chu, do you

26:07

want to add anything about what are

26:09

the key changes or where you see

26:11

this transition going to before we get

26:13

to the next question? No, I think

26:16

actually a lot of that feeds into

26:18

the next question if you want to

26:20

move ahead. So the second question is

26:22

about the new mission and

26:24

vision. And the new mission

26:26

statement from feminine focuses. on

26:28

advancing gender equity in emergency

26:30

medicine and improving reproductive health

26:32

care delivery in emergency departments.

26:34

So Chu, what strategies will

26:37

feminine use to achieve these

26:39

very specific goals? Yeah, I

26:41

think some of them dare already hit

26:43

on, but obviously we want to

26:45

strengthen the clinical care we already

26:47

provide. So this is not something new,

26:49

we already do reproductive health care, but

26:51

this is a time in history where

26:54

we need to bring our aid game.

26:56

We need to explore what kinds of

26:58

things we need to do to meet

27:00

emerging needs in a rapidly shifting political

27:02

landscape. And we need to figure out

27:04

what is the top of our license. And

27:06

this is what emergency medicine does all

27:08

the time when there's changing public health

27:11

needs. We meet it. So I think

27:13

20 years ago it would have been

27:15

unheard of to address, say, the substance

27:17

use disorder crisis, the opioid crisis, the

27:19

way that we do. I mean, people

27:21

would throw things in meeting if you

27:23

talk about screening for HIV. or for

27:25

substance use or for mental health conditions.

27:27

And we do a lot of those

27:29

things as a matter of course now.

27:31

So we are the most changing specialty,

27:33

I would say. We basically look around and

27:36

we say, what are the needs that need to

27:38

be met because we're the safety net and

27:40

after us comes no one. So I think

27:42

right now we need to be the reproductive

27:44

health safety net. There's no question. We just

27:47

cannot leave all of this to OB guy.

27:49

So a lot of what feminine will do

27:51

in this new launch is really think about.

27:53

What in what ways do we expand and

27:55

grow in response to what's happening around

27:57

us? And then, you know, some of these...

28:00

issues are medical but also medical legal

28:02

so how do we understand policy

28:04

and how much it can interfere

28:06

with our care and so how

28:08

do we address those things and

28:10

so that will be the quad

28:12

facto of good clinical resources education

28:14

and that is a very holistic

28:16

education it includes you know didactic

28:18

materials CME, better ultrasound training it

28:20

will be a research agenda both

28:22

understanding and making accessible existing research

28:24

and sponsoring and conducting some of

28:26

our own research and then I'll

28:28

be building community and I think

28:30

some of that will really build

28:32

off the infrastructure that feminine had

28:34

the four ways of gathering bringing

28:36

people together because this work is

28:38

so hard it is not to

28:40

be done in silos that is

28:42

incredibly inefficient and actually very hard

28:44

to do because things change so

28:46

fast and so where a lot

28:48

of what we're building in feminine

28:50

is how do we get people

28:52

to communicate well in their institutions,

28:54

in their states, in their regions

28:56

with people practicing in similar practice

28:58

settings and in counting the same

29:00

challenges and figuring out how we

29:03

create. the environment where people can

29:05

come together and move forward efficiently

29:07

and be stronger because they have

29:09

the wisdom of a dozen women,

29:11

a hundred women, rather than just

29:13

trying to make things up as

29:15

they go along. So there's a

29:17

lot embedded in each of those

29:19

things, but I think those are

29:21

the pillars of what we want

29:23

to do. And the only thing

29:25

I want to add is, you

29:27

know, gender equity is such a

29:29

key part of this. I mean,

29:31

we've had so much discussion about

29:33

Should we just focus on reproductive

29:35

health care or should we keep

29:37

going with this gender equity and

29:39

community building peace? But I think

29:41

because of everything, Dara said, because

29:43

we need to come together, and

29:45

because the fundamental problem we are

29:47

tackling here is gender inequity. I

29:49

mean, you cannot name another health

29:51

problem that is treated like this

29:53

for men. I mean, have you

29:55

ever felt that as a man,

29:57

you go to a hospital and

29:59

And the government is going to

30:01

step in and say where the

30:03

parameters of your care should be

30:05

or say that because of the

30:07

mancare you received, you may actually

30:09

have to face legal consequences or

30:11

lose your license or be brought

30:13

to court or be fined because

30:15

of the way that your man

30:17

issue was treated. I think they're

30:19

fundamentally at the root of this

30:21

entire reason we're together is gender

30:23

equity. And so there is a

30:25

higher purpose here as we need

30:27

to address some of the drivers.

30:29

of how we got here and

30:31

that needs to be done by,

30:33

you know, again, by community by

30:35

bringing women together and by addressing

30:37

these issues. But this is not

30:39

to the exclusion of women. Obviously,

30:41

Ken, you were first in the

30:43

door for feminine and we hope

30:45

to make sure that people understand

30:47

that the resources and opportunities we're

30:49

building are for everybody in emergency

30:51

medicine and for a gender issue

30:53

for the clinician per se, right?

30:56

Like it's not about my gender

30:58

necessarily with regards to the care.

31:00

And so I think it's gender

31:02

less. It affects every clinician who's

31:04

trying to provide care. I don't

31:06

know if your question was rhetorical

31:08

about have I had my medical

31:10

decisions restricted based on my chromosomes,

31:12

my fact that I am lacking

31:14

in X and that I have

31:16

a Y. The answer of course

31:18

is no. But also, you know,

31:20

and I'm careful not to come

31:22

across as a smug Canadian, but

31:24

it also doesn't affect women XX

31:26

or whatever, you know, like if

31:28

you want to get into chromosomes,

31:30

gender, all that, that's a confusing

31:32

sometimes longer. That's a whole other

31:34

podcast, we'll leave it that. But

31:36

reproductive rights and stuff like that

31:38

in Canada are much different than

31:40

in the US, and the US

31:42

has taken a significant change and

31:44

turn that will have material impact

31:46

on women's health. And so I

31:48

still think that... the question if

31:50

you asked a male physician in

31:52

the US or a male in

31:54

the US, I don't think that

31:56

there, maybe you guys can. confirm

31:58

their health care will not be

32:00

restricted or impaired or because of

32:02

that. Is that correct? It's still

32:04

the same in the US and

32:06

Canada if you're a man. That's

32:08

right. No, I think that's true.

32:10

And I think that's true. And I think

32:12

that also goes back to some of

32:15

the things about the mission and the

32:17

vision that I just want to add

32:19

to what Esther said, which is that

32:21

a, no organization can be everything to

32:23

everyone all the time. And so it

32:25

is going to be true that in

32:27

this iteration of feminine, we are very

32:29

transparent about some of the issues we're

32:31

going to face are exclusively American issues.

32:33

Some of them are going to be

32:35

exclusively childbearing issues. Some of them may

32:37

be exclusively female, I would say, gender

32:39

perception issues, right? So whereas a lot

32:41

of our policies and protocols, and the

32:43

work we're going to do is going

32:46

to apply to all female identifying people.

32:48

But some won't. Right. Some will only

32:50

apply to fertile female identifying people or

32:53

fertile people, you know, alone. Some will

32:55

apply to patients who take care of

32:57

everybody who can procreate. Right. So there's

33:00

so many different ways the work we're

33:02

going to do is going to impact

33:04

both patients and providers. And it I

33:07

think that sometimes I think I ask

33:09

for for myself, but I think we

33:11

have to ask for each other grace

33:13

in the idea that not every project

33:16

or every. or every program, every protocol

33:18

is going to be applicable to everybody.

33:20

And I also think that that, because

33:22

there's so much that has to be done,

33:25

right? And if we only did things that

33:27

were applicable to everybody all the time, we

33:29

would miss so much of the nuance, honestly,

33:31

the niche stuff that is even, for people

33:34

that are even more marginalized or less commonly

33:36

thought about because it doesn't apply to everybody

33:38

all the time. And so we hope to

33:40

do a lot of that work that is

33:42

being missed by other people. And I think

33:45

the other thing to say is that in

33:47

the iteration where feminine is a nonprofit that

33:49

has a deep bench and a broad

33:51

team, you know, last time we did

33:53

it, it was very in many ways

33:55

bootstrappy, right? Economically, I put a lot of

33:58

my own money behind it personally because because

34:00

I felt so strongly about getting it

34:02

going. It was an LLC, it had

34:04

a revenue stream, and as soon as

34:06

I got pulled out of the project,

34:08

the project didn't have enough. enough lift

34:10

to stay alive actually. Nobody could dedicate

34:12

that much time unpaid. Nobody could dedicate

34:14

that much energy and it became and

34:17

then obviously we had COVID and other

34:19

things were happening. But the reason I

34:21

say that is to say that the

34:23

goal for this iteration of feminine is

34:25

a non-profit. Feminim to point out is

34:27

that not a single person is the

34:29

core of what is going to happen.

34:31

Right. It will have grant funding, sustainable

34:33

funding, hopefully annualized grants. It will have

34:35

a large board of board of directors.

34:38

It will have a team of physician

34:40

of physician. who will own different parts

34:42

of it, will invest in more professional

34:44

development programs like Esther said that are

34:46

local, so that, you know, a lot

34:48

of these groups that survived in departments

34:50

and in cities, and, you know, even

34:52

all New York City or all LA,

34:54

that is where we're going to invest

34:56

a lot of our resources. So that

34:58

this is so much bigger than the

35:01

team at the, you know, that's spending

35:03

a lot of time doing it, but

35:05

it really is meeting the moment because

35:07

many of something was missing when a

35:09

feminine. sunset it, right? But it couldn't

35:11

come back until a core group of

35:13

people could dedicate this much time and

35:15

energy to bringing it back. But just

35:17

because a core group of people is

35:19

bringing it back, there needs to be

35:22

a huge team of people keeping it

35:24

alive because that is the only way

35:26

this thing survives for the next generation

35:28

of women in emergency medicine and honestly

35:30

the next generation of patients we take

35:32

care of. That's an important point because

35:34

sustainability for these types of initiatives is

35:36

so important and we've seen that Since

35:38

2012 with the rise of foam ed

35:40

the free open access to medical education

35:42

There is this sort of curve that

35:45

comes where you get this huge Increase

35:47

and everybody jumps on and people are

35:49

starting their own blog and podcast and

35:51

here we are 12 13 years later,

35:53

and there's been a bit of culling

35:55

of the herd There's not as many

35:57

blogs and podcasts in the foamed space

35:59

and the one that are sometimes aren't

36:01

as active. And so if you want

36:03

to create something that's going to last,

36:06

you've got to find some, I mean, I'm

36:08

just finishing my NBA, so some way to,

36:10

you know, like sustain it, you know, and

36:12

it really was, you champion feminine 1.0,

36:14

but now we're going to have feminine

36:17

2.0 where it's a much different

36:19

organization, it's non-profit, it's going to

36:22

have a board of directors, you

36:24

know, hopefully sustainable funding from grants

36:26

and things like that. God forbid

36:29

anything happens to any one individual.

36:31

It's the mission. It's the organization

36:33

that will continue with or without

36:36

some of those really important people,

36:38

but the organization and the mission

36:40

is above that is more important.

36:43

I did have one clarifying question

36:45

for you, Chu, and I heard

36:47

you talking and you mentioned something

36:49

about attending meetings where people were

36:51

throwing things at you. My mind

36:53

works this way, and so automatically

36:56

I go back to movies. And

36:58

I know it's a little outside

37:00

my era. It's from 1992,

37:02

a league of their own. And there's

37:04

no crying in baseball. There's

37:07

no throwing things in meetings.

37:09

Who are you inviting to meetings?

37:11

Where people are you inviting

37:14

to meetings? Where people are

37:16

throwing things in meetings? Who

37:18

are you inviting to meetings? People

37:20

would throw things. Not at me.

37:22

But there were actually meetings where

37:24

maybe throwing things is a little

37:26

dramatic, but I remember at the

37:28

beginning of my career when somebody

37:30

would come to a meeting and

37:32

introduce the idea of doing some of

37:35

these public health measures in the

37:37

emergency department. This was really at

37:39

the beginning of addressing public health

37:41

needs in the emergency department by

37:44

systematized screening for things like HIV,

37:46

Pepsi, opiate use disorders, you know,

37:48

so that we could then initiate

37:50

therapy or do. do referrals and warm handoffs

37:53

to make sure that people got their services because

37:55

they weren't showing up to primary care either. So

37:57

where could we capture people who had really high

37:59

public health? needs. That was in the

38:01

emergency department, but there were people,

38:03

and there still are, but much

38:05

more than, who were like, I

38:07

treat heart attacks, I treat trauma,

38:09

I treat strokes, and sepsis, and

38:11

anything else is for primary care.

38:13

And of course, you know, that

38:15

answer is not the right one,

38:17

especially in places like the United

38:19

States, where so many millions, tens

38:21

of millions of people don't have

38:23

ready access to primary care. Yeah,

38:25

the hair in the back of

38:27

my neck always goes up when

38:29

somebody says, it's not my job.

38:31

You know, it may not be

38:33

your job specifically to do that

38:35

specific care, but it is your

38:37

job to facilitate it if that

38:39

patient comes in and there's always

38:41

something you can do and help

38:44

them with. And that doesn't necessarily

38:46

mean you're going to be doing

38:48

that specific care. But like you

38:50

said, a warm handoff to make

38:52

sure that the people do get

38:54

the care they need. And one

38:56

of the things that... bothers me

38:58

sometimes about fellow emergency physicians is

39:00

that they do think that they're

39:02

only there for emergencies and I

39:04

view it slightly different. I think

39:06

we're there to assess everyone to

39:08

see if they have an emergency

39:10

and to pick the signal out

39:12

of the noise and that's where

39:14

our skill set is and the

39:16

patient defines whether they think this

39:18

is urgent or emergent and needs

39:20

to come in and I'm happy

39:22

that most of the time it

39:24

isn't. And then I can refer

39:26

them on to the appropriate individual

39:28

that can take care of them.

39:30

So we've heard about this new

39:32

mission and vision, Jenny. Can you

39:34

give me a little bit more

39:36

about the strategies that will be

39:38

used in feminine to achieve the

39:40

goals that they're trying to achieve

39:42

with this new mission and vision?

39:44

I think the really specific change

39:46

that people are going to see

39:48

within feminine is... a model that

39:50

now includes a lot more actual

39:52

CME content and actual protocols. And

39:54

this can be a place that

39:56

you can come for, even, you

39:58

know, tip of the finger knowledge.

40:00

on shift. Famnam didn't used to

40:02

have that kind of clinical focus.

40:04

It had much more of this

40:06

professional development focus. And I think

40:09

now this is going to be

40:11

a website and a resource that

40:13

people use on shift to get

40:15

access to information that they need,

40:17

as well as off shift to

40:19

get continuing medical education in this

40:22

area of medical care. I think

40:24

this brings up the next question very

40:26

nicely Ken. Okay, so number three, see

40:28

how she directed me there. So number

40:30

three is addressing reproductive health care challenges.

40:32

One of the standout components, because we've

40:34

been talking about some of the key

40:36

changes and stuff, one of the standout

40:38

components of this relaunch of feminine. is

40:40

the focus on reproductive health care

40:43

emergencies. So I'm looking for you

40:45

to elaborate on the evidence-based protocols

40:47

and resources feminine 2.0 plans to

40:50

implement and how they will impact

40:52

patient outcomes. So the reason why

40:54

I wanted to bridge those two conversations

40:57

is that a lot of the the

40:59

evidence-based protocols that we're going to talk

41:01

about. Some people sit without the outside

41:03

of the wheelhouse of what they traditionally

41:05

thought was their job in emergency medicine.

41:08

So for the last six or eight

41:10

months, I was consulting for an organization

41:12

called Access Bridge, so was Esther. And

41:14

so we have been working with

41:16

a team to work on these

41:18

protocols that basically create a diagnostic

41:20

algorithm around the evidence-based care for

41:23

patients having reproductive health care emergencies

41:25

specifically in the first trimester. So

41:27

thinking about things like ectopic pregnancy

41:29

decision making or management of a

41:31

miscarriage, but also putting into context

41:33

some of the changing landscape of access

41:35

and opportunity that patients may have in

41:38

states with new restrictions on abortion access,

41:40

which again, plenty of people will tell

41:42

us. that abortion restrictions have nothing to

41:44

do with decision making around miscarriage management.

41:46

And then I will remind them that

41:48

three of the articles we heard from

41:50

Pro Public of this year were women

41:52

who were having miscarriages who died because

41:54

the care they needed was not delivered

41:56

and the state they lived in had

41:59

an abortion ban. can tell me

42:01

that correlation is not causation and

42:03

this time I'm going to say

42:05

you're wrong because in states that

42:07

are restricting abortion access we are

42:10

seeing collateral damage to patients around

42:12

the delivery of care in non-elective

42:14

terminations in places like that are

42:16

the diagnostic decision-making and treatment for

42:18

ectopic pregnancies or miscarriages and the

42:21

protocols that we've developed will help

42:23

neutralize the concern that you're making

42:25

a decision in a moment for

42:27

a patient rather than following best

42:30

practices. So we've scored the evidence

42:32

of the articles around, let's say,

42:34

decision-making on a topic pregnancy. And

42:36

we know that the decision-making on

42:38

a topic pregnancy when informed by

42:41

the patient's condition and ultrasound findings

42:43

and the beta HCG level can...

42:45

present a opportunity to advise the

42:47

patient on whether or not they

42:50

want to have methotrexate for a

42:52

obvious ectopic pregnancy without a fetal

42:54

pole or maybe a presumed ectopic

42:56

pregnancy with a beta HCG that's

42:59

high enough to make that decision.

43:01

But most importantly that a physician

43:03

in a state where they are

43:05

concerned that they have to have

43:07

diagnostic certainty, they can then look

43:10

at the protocol and say actually.

43:12

This is my ultrasound, this is

43:14

my patient, this is my beta

43:16

HCG, this is my path, I'm

43:19

calling GYN and I am having

43:21

a conversation about, you know, offering

43:23

this patient methotrexate because their beta

43:25

HCG is 4,000 and my ultrasound

43:28

officially does not show an interuter

43:30

in pregnancy. Those protocols are are

43:32

very central to empowering physicians to

43:34

practice evidence-based medicine when there are

43:36

lots of noise around them and

43:39

concern that they may be criminalized

43:41

or charged with a crime or

43:43

even questioned after the fact. And

43:45

that's one of the things that

43:48

for us, we are reminding emergency

43:50

physicians that even though you may

43:52

not yourself be seeing this practice

43:54

change in your ER on the

43:56

day you worked, the field is

43:59

saying that there are issues. Estrand

44:01

I did some research on this

44:03

and found that emergency medicine physicians

44:05

across the country were changing their

44:08

practice around ectopic pregnancy decision-making to

44:10

be more certain to have another ultrasound

44:12

to have a higher beta HCG in

44:14

order to go down that diet the

44:17

treatment algorithm for ectopic pregnancy and the

44:19

same thing is obviously true for miscarriage

44:21

management to ensure that patients are getting

44:24

the best evidence in 2018. the American

44:26

College of Obstetricians and

44:29

Gynecologists. Again, we think the

44:31

Canadian College probably says the same thing,

44:33

but I can't speak for the

44:35

Canadians, but ACOG put out

44:37

its best practices policy statement,

44:39

which says that patients should

44:41

be offered medication management. which

44:43

includes Miffa Pristone for miscarriage

44:45

2018. This is prior to

44:47

the Dobbs decision, it has

44:49

nothing to do with the

44:51

elective termination of pregnancy, and

44:53

yet we're seeing states like

44:55

Louisiana change access and availability

44:58

to Miffa Pristone, and that

45:00

changes whether or not a physician feels

45:02

comfortable necessarily writing that

45:04

prescription, again, having nothing

45:07

to do with electraformation.

45:09

So. we will provide resources to

45:11

teach physicians how to have myfopristone

45:13

on formulary and how to be

45:15

certified to prescribe myfopristone

45:17

for miscarriage. Again, in other states

45:19

like in New York and California

45:22

and Oregon where Esther and I

45:24

practice in work, you may decide

45:26

as a provider to understand more

45:28

about medication abortion administration and your

45:31

emergency department and that is an opportunity

45:33

that people should have. We're seeing very

45:35

successful data come out of California. Another

45:37

one of our teammates, if you will,

45:40

in the work we did at Access Bridge,

45:42

Monica Sixenna published very successful data showing

45:44

that you can prescribe Mifurpristone

45:46

from the emergency department for

45:48

the elective termination of a

45:50

pregnancy and have really success in

45:52

patient outcomes insofar as the patient is

45:55

getting the care that they're looking for.

45:57

And as physicians who take care of whole

45:59

patients. and really try to deliver patient-centered

46:01

care that is equitable and accessible. It's

46:04

really important that we create access points

46:06

for all care across the board, but

46:08

it is. And it's foundation important

46:10

that we as emergency physicians know how

46:13

to take best care of our patients.

46:15

And when the system is falling

46:17

apart around us, and that system could

46:19

be as simple as decreased number of

46:22

OBGY plans in your community, changes

46:24

in access in community pharmacies, patients losing

46:26

access to insurance because your state

46:28

Medicaid laws are changing under federal government

46:30

changes. Like there's a lot of things

46:33

that are about to happen. again,

46:35

in the United States patient access, that

46:37

we as emergency physicians will be holding

46:39

the ball, if you will, you

46:42

know, Esther. That's, yeah. And that's why

46:44

we can't sit back and say let

46:46

it all play out with Obie

46:48

Guines or out in the community, because

46:51

it's hard to imagine a circumstance in

46:53

which it doesn't start to impact

46:55

our care. I mean, I think over

46:57

the past decade, there was a recent

47:00

Jama paper that said over the

47:02

past decade. something like 500 rural hospitals,

47:04

predominantly rural hospitals lost their maternal

47:06

care presence, meaning that where does that

47:08

care fall then? So you lost your

47:11

person and your department in the

47:13

hospital that you're going to call with

47:15

some of these maternal reproductive care emergencies

47:17

and so more falls to the

47:19

emergency department. We're seeing that trainees are

47:22

making different decisions about where they train

47:24

and where they stay after training

47:26

and that is. widening the maternal care

47:28

gaps that are already quite wide across

47:31

the country, where it is back

47:33

careful, back to the emergency department. It

47:35

means that we have fewer closed follow-up

47:37

options and we just want to

47:39

discharge and have them follow-up, and it

47:42

means that people will bounce back

47:44

to us instead of going to an

47:46

accessible clinic in their community. And so

47:48

there is no circumstance where we

47:50

can dodge these kind of issues, and

47:53

so we can either face it and

47:55

prepare, or we can have some

47:57

really bad shifts in the emergency department.

47:59

and then to where we're reliable for

48:02

poor care. And we talk about this

48:04

a lot, like it's the same,

48:06

like contraception initiation, right? Again, this

48:08

is something that sounds, you know,

48:10

we get a lot of pushback

48:12

when we have this conversation socially

48:14

about whether or not contraception should

48:16

be initiated in the emergency department.

48:18

And look, there's over the counter

48:20

contraception contraception. We do not talk

48:22

about motrin initiation has shown us

48:25

that this kind of. this medication,

48:27

it is available without a prescription.

48:29

So let's kind of talk about

48:31

our barriers to access. But having

48:33

just the conversation about whether or not

48:35

a patient wants to be pregnant or

48:37

wants to know more about contraception, plenty

48:39

of people take contraception and use contraception

48:42

not just to avoid pregnancy, right? But

48:44

it is really important and Esther and

48:46

I have talked a lot about. you

48:48

know, she'll text me after a shift

48:50

and be like, guess what I did

48:53

yesterday? You know, it's patients that are

48:55

ours, like it's patients that are undamissiled,

48:57

right, who want to be on contraception,

48:59

but they want to be on long

49:01

acting contraception because they know that getting

49:04

pregnant as a person without a home

49:06

is a not great plan and they

49:08

want to be empowered to, you know,

49:10

whatever it is, and being able to

49:13

offer them long acting contraception contraception in

49:15

the ED. is a, I mean, I don't think it's a

49:17

miracle, but it's a big deal. I mean,

49:19

Esther, do you want to speak to that?

49:21

I mean, no, I think it's true. Again, I mean,

49:23

a lot of people will say, and we

49:25

just did a survey study of clinician

49:28

attitudes towards something like contraception

49:30

provision or counseling and emergency

49:33

department, and it's a survey

49:35

because we need to ask people how

49:37

they feel, because this would be an

49:39

extension of the care we provide. And

49:42

there's certainly a lot of comments like.

49:44

This is not in our wheelhouse. Can't we send

49:46

them to primary care? Which they don't have, by

49:48

the way. And why do we need to ever

49:50

expand what emergency medicine does? But the problem is

49:53

everybody in the system is saying it's not their

49:55

issue. So talking with a colleague in Obie Guine

49:57

here, she's like, you know, the number of people.

50:00

We see who have been for 10

50:02

or 15 years on a teratogenic medication

50:04

without their prescribing physician ever talking to

50:06

them about what their plan is for

50:08

if they want to get pregnant, when

50:10

they want to get pregnant, what birth

50:13

control are on? And they are unaware.

50:15

No one has had this conversation. Do

50:17

you know that if you get pregnant

50:19

on this medication you need to stop

50:21

it? And it may be critical for

50:23

you to control your symptoms of whatever

50:26

rheumatologic disease they have, or you should

50:28

be on a contraception straight through, and

50:30

nobody has had that conversation. And you

50:32

know, for OB down, they're like, okay,

50:34

so their primary care wasn't having that

50:36

conversation. The rheumatologist is not having that

50:39

conversation. They don't have a women's health

50:41

provider, and they're showing up in your

50:43

ED, like who here can help us.

50:45

no more than a few minutes to

50:47

address. I mean, we, you know, I

50:49

think it's very obvious to care providers

50:52

that we are a source of medication

50:54

refills, right? I mean, that's not a

50:56

surprise. I'm sure that happens in, I

50:58

assume it's not a US problem, but

51:00

it also happens in Canada. They may

51:02

come in for something else and then

51:04

say, I also need some medical med

51:07

refills because I've run out and I'm

51:09

not going to see my primary care

51:11

for several months. And we generally like

51:13

refill those as a matter of those

51:15

as a matter of course. But we

51:17

carve a hole around contraception because we

51:20

feel like, oh, that needs a specialist.

51:22

When actually it has, it's a very

51:24

common and safe medication that's way more

51:26

common than the alternative, which is an

51:28

unplanned pregnancy. And yet we feel like

51:30

there's some special magic that needs to

51:33

happen in an opium clinic six months

51:35

from now. It doesn't make sense. It's

51:37

very interesting how we'll have these over-the-counter

51:39

medicines, like you were saying ibuprofen, and

51:41

talking about those types of things. you

51:43

know, we don't have those, oh, we've

51:46

got to have an informed consent decision,

51:48

whatever, and yet we shy away from

51:50

anything involving sex. And maybe that's the

51:52

difference. Maybe that's the correlation, Dara. Yes,

51:54

sex, gender, and all of it. And

51:56

I think that, I guess, these six.

51:59

a lot of this and saying, this

52:01

is health care. And that's why it's

52:03

an important thing for us to

52:05

address as evidence-based people, at people

52:07

who practice evidence-based medicine, let's kind

52:09

of incorporate that into our care

52:12

and not let other people redefine

52:14

our language around it. Well, I

52:16

like that Chu brought up the whole

52:18

idea of rural practices because that's an

52:21

area that I advocate for greatly. I

52:23

grew up on an apple farm. Apples

52:25

are a doctor's kryptonite. It's supposed to

52:27

lead. keep you away, but it didn't

52:30

keep me away having four or five

52:32

thousand apple trees. I went into medicine

52:34

anyways, but this whole idea of

52:36

rural medicine and my position

52:38

is that access to care should be

52:41

based on your need, not on your

52:43

postal code. Now I can translate that

52:45

for our American listeners, not based on

52:48

your zip code. So your zip code

52:50

shouldn't determine your access to care that

52:52

is necessary, right? And everybody should have

52:55

timely access and appropriate access to emergency

52:57

care. And that doesn't mean we have

52:59

a neurosurge in every rural town, but

53:02

we should have the setup that those

53:04

people can be assessed, stabilized, treated, and

53:06

transferred appropriately to definitive level of care

53:09

that may be outside the scope of

53:11

what can be done in a rural.

53:13

facility. And for you, Dara, when it

53:15

talks, when you talk about evidence-based medicine,

53:17

you know, it is hard to practice

53:19

medicine. The practice of medicine is

53:21

difficult, and the evidence-based medicine model

53:24

looks for the best evidence, which

53:26

means the least biased. So we're

53:28

looking for the best evidence, the

53:31

best literature, but we apply our

53:33

clinical judgment. And then, of course,

53:35

we ask the patients about their

53:37

values and preferences, and that's that

53:39

then diagram of the three pillars.

53:41

is politics and that would just

53:43

make it so much more complicated.

53:45

It's already very complicated, but that

53:47

adds a whole other layer. So

53:50

I'd really like just to get

53:52

back to that ethos, that philosophy

53:54

of evidence-based medicine and giving patients

53:56

the best care based on the

53:58

best evidence. Jenny back in... question

54:00

one you were talking about you

54:02

know key changes and inviting and

54:05

engaging with patients and women about

54:07

their health care and that was

54:09

a going to be a key

54:11

change with the relaunch of feminine

54:14

what's the impact that you think

54:16

that this will have with regards

54:18

to the patient outcomes when addressing

54:20

reproductive health care? Well I think

54:23

the Chu, who is on this

54:25

call, Chu is going to be

54:27

the one who's probably going to

54:29

do all the research who tells

54:32

us exactly what impact this has,

54:34

because that's her wheelhouse. But, you

54:36

know, in short, Ken, people are

54:38

dying. You know, you've heard stories

54:41

today about patients who are dying

54:43

in our emergency departments, in our

54:45

wards, because care is not happening

54:47

at home, because they're scared to

54:49

get the care that they need.

54:52

And that is unacceptable. It is

54:54

absolutely unacceptable. People are literally dying

54:56

for health care. For health care.

54:58

Right. For care that is not

55:01

hard and not complicated and not

55:03

controversial, it shouldn't be. Well, the

55:05

health care component part of it

55:07

isn't. Right. The medicine, the thing

55:10

that a doctor and a nurse

55:12

can do for a patient is

55:14

not. that is the impact and

55:16

and she will study it at

55:19

length I'm sure and give us

55:21

all the numbers but the main

55:23

thing is that nobody should be

55:25

dying for this. But we need

55:28

to keep moving along here and

55:30

so we're coming up to number

55:32

four and this one's an important

55:34

one this is about mentorship and

55:36

career development and I have to

55:39

tell you mentors were very important

55:41

to me and I'm sure you

55:43

had many mentors but when we're

55:45

talking about mentors for me and

55:48

education and leadership You know, the

55:50

legend of emergency medicine is Diane

55:52

Brumbomer. Dr. Brumbomer is just a

55:54

rock star who has helped me

55:57

out so much as an educator.

55:59

And I see that mentorship

56:01

and career development, you know, it's

56:04

always been a cornerstone of the

56:06

feminine, but I want to know

56:08

how new mentorship programs are going

56:10

to be designed to support women

56:12

in emergency medicine and what role

56:14

do they play in addressing issues

56:17

like burnout or moral injury and

56:19

also career development. Cheer,

56:21

you got to break some news here. Can I,

56:23

can I talk about it? I mean, I think

56:25

you can. It's

56:32

just funny to us that you

56:34

mentioned Diane because she will

56:36

be serving on the board

56:38

of directors of feminine and

56:40

because she is the legendary

56:42

mentor to countless people in

56:44

emergency medicine. She will be so influential

56:46

in how we develop this out for

56:48

many years to come. I mean, because

56:50

as you say, we're now changing as

56:52

an organization. I think some of this,

56:54

I mean, we know what we want

56:56

to do right now, but some of

56:58

this will evolve for the new times

57:01

and we really have to think about

57:03

what does mentorship mean in this new

57:05

era and how do we best support

57:07

people in doing very specific things and

57:09

implementing new models of care where they

57:11

are. And I think what you need

57:13

really depends on, it is like, you know,

57:15

kind of this big. and mentor model and

57:17

will lean on Diane a lot for

57:19

that and how we build community across

57:21

and gross across. our whole membership, but

57:23

mentorship in this area is a funny

57:25

thing because the best mentor to you

57:27

may be the closest person who practices

57:29

in a similar practice setting. And some

57:31

of those connections are not obvious. For

57:33

example, you can practice in the same

57:35

state and you have three other friends

57:37

who are interested in advanced and reproductive

57:39

care, but one of you works at

57:41

the VA Medical Center, you know, the

57:43

government run medical center, one of you

57:45

works in a public county hospital, and

57:48

one of you works in a Catholic

57:50

hospital. And the challenges that you face...

57:52

and the limits of what you can

57:54

do and the language you need to

57:56

learn and need to use and the

57:58

allies that you need. to implement care

58:01

changes are completely different. And so

58:03

we're really thinking about who is

58:05

the best person to meet your

58:07

needs institutionally when you're trying to

58:09

advance some of these topics and

58:12

have faced the same hardships you

58:14

have. And so that's part of

58:16

the exciting thing about feminine 2.0

58:18

is that we're, we've got a

58:21

lot of challenges and exciting challenges

58:23

and opportunities to try to match

58:25

people with the support they need.

58:27

And I think that one of the,

58:29

One of the things that we learned

58:32

last time and also one of the

58:34

things we're investing in is this kind

58:36

of deep broad and personalizable connectedness in

58:38

emergency medicine for people. I think that,

58:40

you know, again, if you are really

58:43

honest about where we are as a

58:45

specialty from five years ago, the level

58:47

of moral injury we have survived is

58:49

overwhelming. And it's not getting better every

58:51

day at all. And I don't even

58:54

know who's trying to make it better.

58:56

I think that a lot of our

58:58

clinical practice environments are with boarding and,

59:00

you know, violence and, you know, resource

59:02

issues not related to reproductive health care.

59:05

I mean, obviously, if you add in

59:07

legislative overreach to that, it's even worse.

59:09

But if you are just practicing emergency

59:11

medicine in a rural New York City

59:13

hospital, I mean, at an urban New

59:16

York City hospital like I am, you

59:18

know, it's not always that great. You

59:20

know, it's like, you know, Esther and

59:22

I talk about, compare notes about how

59:24

many patients were being held or how

59:27

much boarding there was or you know

59:29

how many patients you know stayed for

59:31

what period of time and we're hearing

59:33

this across the border from all emergency

59:36

professional you know emergency medicine providers regardless

59:38

of where they work and so I

59:40

think that there's a lot of the

59:42

practice of emergency medicine again that it's

59:44

not only related to women in medicine

59:47

but when you are a woman in

59:49

medicine and you are balancing so many

59:51

different things and you are thinking about

59:53

you know being a lead parent in

59:55

your house or all the other things

59:58

that we've balanced and you know we

1:00:00

see so many more issues now with

1:00:02

care response. is being shared amongst parents

1:00:04

because one of the benefits of the

1:00:06

pandemic, if you can say it that

1:00:09

way, is that a lot of people

1:00:11

resented their life to be more present

1:00:13

in their families. They did think about

1:00:15

what it was like to be a

1:00:17

present parent or present child or whatever

1:00:20

it is and prioritize whatever is important

1:00:22

to you. And that does require the

1:00:24

workplace to accommodate, you know, and to

1:00:26

create a flexibility that many people in

1:00:28

the world work from home, the aftermath

1:00:31

of COVID and not for us. But

1:00:33

it is a little bit for us,

1:00:35

right? How much conference is done virtually

1:00:37

now? How much, you know, how many

1:00:39

people are working from home to do

1:00:42

at least their research? There is a

1:00:44

level of acceptance that way. So I

1:00:46

guess when it comes to our mentorship

1:00:48

and career development, it will lead into

1:00:50

this new normal of emergency medicine that

1:00:53

is both worse and better and figure

1:00:55

out what does that mean for the

1:00:57

career development of? women physicians going forward,

1:00:59

again, not related to reproductive health care.

1:01:02

Although again, if you live in a

1:01:04

state as a person who can get

1:01:06

pregnant and thinking about your course as

1:01:08

a pregnant person, while you're also a

1:01:10

physician, that may inform your personal life,

1:01:13

not just your professional life as well.

1:01:15

Well, I mention how Diane Bernbomer is

1:01:17

one of my mentors and she is

1:01:19

a Legend

1:01:22

of emergency medicine. Jenny, do you

1:01:24

have any mentors? You want to

1:01:26

give a shout out too? Well,

1:01:29

I would be remiss if I

1:01:31

didn't say to Ann Burnbummer, but

1:01:33

I would also be remiss if

1:01:35

I didn't just say to other

1:01:37

people on this call. I mean,

1:01:39

it's as the not much younger,

1:01:41

but more junior in career member

1:01:43

of this team. these two women,

1:01:45

Dr. Dair Cass and Esther Chu,

1:01:47

are the two who got me

1:01:49

involved in this work in the

1:01:51

first place and have taken me

1:01:53

hand in hand through everything I've

1:01:55

learned about it and I am

1:01:57

forever grateful to them. Honestly, it's...

1:01:59

It's literally too hard to pick

1:02:01

anybody specific because, you know, I

1:02:04

have a role in resident education.

1:02:06

And so I do a lot

1:02:08

of work with just so many

1:02:10

young and enthusiastic and brilliant people. And

1:02:12

so if I started naming names, I

1:02:14

would forget names and I would just

1:02:17

feel bad. So what I want to

1:02:19

say is I have had these amazing

1:02:21

residents and I have had even just,

1:02:23

you know, one off mentorship meetings with

1:02:26

people who come to me for a

1:02:28

specific goal. One of the things I'm

1:02:30

really excited about with feminine 2.0

1:02:32

is that all of these people

1:02:34

that over the last few years

1:02:36

I have had these little relationships

1:02:38

with or longer relationships with are

1:02:40

going to find a home again

1:02:42

in a bigger tent where they're

1:02:44

going to learn from each other,

1:02:46

grow from each other, find new

1:02:49

mentors, find longer term mentorship, then

1:02:51

I have been able to provide

1:02:53

on my own while feminine was

1:02:55

on life support. this is going to

1:02:57

be a major catalyst for good and for

1:02:59

change in our specialty. I think it's really

1:03:01

smart about some of the educational

1:03:03

programs that we're putting in place too.

1:03:05

And this will lead next to your

1:03:07

next question because we're about to talk

1:03:09

about champions of change. But one thing

1:03:11

that program is doing that I think

1:03:13

is so savvy is they're not just

1:03:15

measuring what do you learn in these

1:03:18

medical student educational programs, but also

1:03:20

what impact does it have? on your

1:03:22

well-being as a professional and on

1:03:24

your burnout scores? Because obviously we're

1:03:26

one of the top burnout specialties,

1:03:28

at least here in the emergency

1:03:30

department. Is it the same? I'm

1:03:32

here in the US. Is this

1:03:34

the same in Canada? Are you

1:03:36

also the top? It's the third year in

1:03:38

a row for emergency physicians to report some

1:03:41

level of burnout. compared to all other specialties

1:03:43

and Canada is also very high. I don't

1:03:45

know if they're the number one, but you're

1:03:47

number one down in the US. We're number

1:03:49

one. Yeah, and I think a lot of

1:03:51

it has to do with our problems are

1:03:54

ones that we're told that we can do

1:03:56

nothing about. You know, at least that's what,

1:03:58

you know, constantly we're told nothing. can be

1:04:00

done about the burning issue, about the

1:04:02

boarding issue, nothing can be done about

1:04:04

the lack of resources and things like

1:04:06

that. But when we give people something

1:04:09

that is meaningful, that actually promises to

1:04:11

move the specialty and provide better care

1:04:13

for patients, what does that do to

1:04:15

that actually to your mental health and

1:04:17

to the course of your entire career?

1:04:19

That's actually the kind of ambitious goals

1:04:21

we have with our... educational programs, but

1:04:23

I'll leave that for dare to explain

1:04:25

a little bit more. Yeah, I mean,

1:04:27

you're like, we're both taking Ken's questions

1:04:30

from him. So basically we ask you,

1:04:32

Ken. Do you have any other questions

1:04:34

for us? I was just going to

1:04:36

make a comment that, you know, you

1:04:38

can't keep the world warm by setting

1:04:40

yourself on fire, and that's something I

1:04:42

had to learn. And so from a

1:04:44

burnout perspective, that was a good friend

1:04:46

of mine from the UK told me

1:04:49

that. Question number five, and this is

1:04:51

about Champions of Change, I would make

1:04:53

a friendly amendment and tell you to

1:04:55

call it Super Shiroz, but Champions of

1:04:57

Change is the program that you're going

1:04:59

to do. It's an exciting initiative targeting

1:05:01

medical students. So how do you envision

1:05:03

this program shaping the next generation, the

1:05:05

future, the people that are going to

1:05:08

be taking care of me as I

1:05:10

approach 60 here, you know, and advocate

1:05:12

for systemic change? So this actually, so

1:05:14

it's still going to be called Champions

1:05:16

of Change. We take your suggestion kindly

1:05:18

and we, it's under advisement, okay. But

1:05:20

the whole idea of this program, I

1:05:22

think, it grew out of the idea

1:05:24

that, you know, it's, and again, like,

1:05:27

it's launching January 20th, and I don't

1:05:29

know how much you know about what

1:05:31

that date will mean in the domestic

1:05:33

architecture, but here in the United States,

1:05:35

we're hitting into a time where a

1:05:37

lot of people are going to feel

1:05:39

disempowered as empowered as building future public

1:05:41

health and medical students, a lot of

1:05:43

them are going to really need a

1:05:46

place to land to think about how

1:05:48

do I understand how to make a

1:05:50

system better. And so one of our

1:05:52

colleagues, again, like there's a big team

1:05:54

in Emory, had been on the board

1:05:56

of medical students for choice for a

1:05:58

long time and knew a lot about

1:06:00

medical student, change management, but really felt

1:06:02

that there was a gap in the

1:06:05

landscape of access to teaching medical students

1:06:07

about how to be change agents at

1:06:09

their institution and what does it mean

1:06:11

to know how to change medical school,

1:06:13

a curriculum, you know, to be part

1:06:15

of policy change, to understand health systems

1:06:17

at your state level, federally, whatever it

1:06:19

is. And so she envisioned this program

1:06:21

for medical students that's a curriculum that's

1:06:24

six months long. It's open to any

1:06:26

medical student in, you know. domestically or

1:06:28

internationally inferior, although I think we're going

1:06:30

to focus on domestic to start because

1:06:32

again, you can't be everything to everyone

1:06:34

all the time, but Canadian medical students

1:06:37

we might make an exception for. That's

1:06:39

for you, Ken. But it's really, it's open

1:06:41

curriculum, it's an open program and it's basically

1:06:43

rooted in the idea that before you get

1:06:45

frustrated at the system that you cannot change, let's

1:06:47

teach you how to be an agent of change.

1:06:49

And we're going to talk a little bit about

1:06:51

reproductive health care, like that's going to be the

1:06:54

case. base that we're going to use for this

1:06:56

conversation. But it can be used on anything, right?

1:06:58

So if you find, if you're somebody that wants

1:07:00

to change public health in another way, so let's

1:07:02

say you want to be a substance use disorder,

1:07:05

or you want to worry about gun violence, or

1:07:07

if you want to talk about, you know, operations,

1:07:09

or whatever it is, you will learn those skills

1:07:11

in this. in this course and it's open to

1:07:13

medical students. It will start January 20th. It

1:07:16

will run for six months. There

1:07:18

will be a curriculum of lectures

1:07:20

that are virtual and then there

1:07:22

will be group organization and research

1:07:24

mentorship and the goal is really

1:07:26

to catch medical students before they're

1:07:28

falling and figure out if being

1:07:31

in a community of change makers

1:07:33

and learning skills that then allow

1:07:35

you to move forward with purpose

1:07:37

will. buffer the anxiety and burnout that

1:07:39

we are already seeing with both

1:07:41

medical students, obviously residents and physicians,

1:07:43

but getting to get them early.

1:07:46

So, you know, the idea of

1:07:48

a career development program that does

1:07:50

use reproductive health care knowledge as

1:07:52

its clinical case, but really is

1:07:54

about the longevity for medical students,

1:07:56

not only for women medical students,

1:07:58

for all medical students. kind

1:08:00

of exactly where we want to be

1:08:02

in feminine 2.0, right? So it was

1:08:04

this wonderful program to launch the day

1:08:06

the website goes live. So remember, feminine.org

1:08:09

will go live January 20th. It won't

1:08:11

be perfect. It's been a quick turnaround.

1:08:13

So it will have been less than

1:08:15

six weeks from the time we decided

1:08:17

to do this to time the website

1:08:19

will go live. And if you know

1:08:21

anything about website design, that's a really,

1:08:24

even just for that project, it's very

1:08:26

quick. It's very quick. But. The website

1:08:28

will go live. There will be resources

1:08:30

on it. There will be ways to

1:08:32

engage. You'll understand more about, you know,

1:08:34

how do you want to be part

1:08:37

of the group that works on programmatic

1:08:39

development? Or do you want to be

1:08:41

part of the group that works on

1:08:43

the best practices for women in medicine

1:08:45

and the employment best practices? Do you

1:08:47

want to help decide what? search criteria,

1:08:50

would you want to look for in

1:08:52

a job, right? So if you're looking

1:08:54

for a new job, would you want

1:08:56

to know more about flexible scheduling or

1:08:58

the night's policy or a differential for

1:09:00

nocturnists or the local school district or

1:09:03

maybe you want to know about the

1:09:05

night life? Like I don't want to

1:09:07

tell people what they want to know.

1:09:09

I just want to know what they

1:09:11

want to know. And so how do

1:09:13

you want to engage with this team

1:09:15

to inform the work that we're doing

1:09:18

going forward? Stay tuned, I guess, is

1:09:20

what it comes down to, because I

1:09:22

think that we're very excited to be

1:09:24

doing this. If you had asked me

1:09:26

six months ago, if this is how

1:09:28

I'd be opening 2025, true, I would

1:09:31

have told, if you had told me,

1:09:33

right, I would have said, you're crazy.

1:09:35

This is not how I expected to

1:09:37

open 2025. That's a surprise, for sure.

1:09:39

to live in interesting times. I really

1:09:41

wish there was that champions of change

1:09:44

program. When I was a medical student,

1:09:46

I could have learned so much because

1:09:48

for the longest time I'm like, oh

1:09:50

well, here's a paper, therefore, right? And

1:09:52

that's not how change happens. And I've

1:09:54

had to learn that out in the

1:09:56

field. And certainly my NBA has helped

1:09:59

me with that. I think that is

1:10:01

so important for medical students to learn

1:10:03

how to navigate the system and

1:10:05

nudge it and change it for

1:10:07

the better and for the better

1:10:09

both for the health care they're

1:10:11

providing patients but also for their

1:10:13

own longevity and practice and things

1:10:15

like that. And I'm just going

1:10:17

to come out and say it.

1:10:19

You guys. the two of you

1:10:21

have been real champions to me

1:10:23

and I've learned so much from

1:10:25

being associated with this program in

1:10:27

the periphery and you know I

1:10:29

follow the content and I listen

1:10:31

to you because you've taught me so

1:10:34

much so I really appreciate

1:10:36

it and again we really

1:10:38

we want to remind anyone

1:10:40

listening that we're getting old like I

1:10:42

mean it I'm the oldest one on

1:10:44

this call I know but like

1:10:46

you know It's really important that

1:10:49

this new, this new iteration, whatever,

1:10:51

feminine point 2.0, it has a

1:10:53

generational lift. It is bringing in

1:10:55

more voices that are younger, it

1:10:57

is inclusive, it is dynamic, it

1:10:59

is better than it was. I

1:11:01

mean, the lessons we've learned from

1:11:03

the first time are real, and

1:11:05

they're a little painful, to be honest.

1:11:07

I mean, you do the best you can,

1:11:09

and then you admit when you weren't

1:11:11

perfect. I feel like that has to

1:11:13

be part of this, like we are

1:11:16

learning too. And there are things that

1:11:18

I look back on and say, I

1:11:20

don't want to say I would have

1:11:22

moved slower, but I definitely could have,

1:11:24

there are definitely times that we could

1:11:26

have done things differently or, and so

1:11:28

I think that the gap in time

1:11:30

was good for us, right, because it

1:11:32

gave us a chance to like look

1:11:34

back and take a deep breath and

1:11:36

kind of learn from what we did.

1:11:38

And yet we're going to make mistakes

1:11:40

again. But I don't I hope nobody's looking

1:11:43

for perfection because if they are then

1:11:45

they're suffering from a potential nirvana fallacy

1:11:47

And unless it's perfect we can't do

1:11:49

it and it doesn't need to be

1:11:51

perfect It needs to be sufficient. It

1:11:53

needs to be enough and we can

1:11:55

have that iterative open mindset that we're

1:11:57

constantly changing and improving for the better

1:11:59

So I'm not going to sit there

1:12:02

and go on feminine.org on January 20th

1:12:04

and start criticizing parts of the website

1:12:06

that may not be perfect. I'm just

1:12:08

happy that you're relaunching it because it's

1:12:10

clear that feminine 2.0 is more than

1:12:13

just a relaunch. It's a movement towards

1:12:15

lasting change in our world of emergency

1:12:17

medicine and in the House of Medicine.

1:12:19

And so I really want to thank

1:12:21

you for sharing your journey with us

1:12:24

before we wrap up though. You know,

1:12:26

it's always good to have a call

1:12:28

to action at the end of something.

1:12:30

And so there's three of you. I'm

1:12:32

going to ask each one of you

1:12:35

to give me one call to action.

1:12:37

So I'll start with Dara. What's your

1:12:39

call to action? My call to action

1:12:41

is to go to the website on

1:12:43

January 20th and look at it and

1:12:46

take in what's there and feel free

1:12:48

to send us notes and feedback, sign

1:12:50

up for the newsletter again, be part

1:12:52

of the community. This only will work

1:12:54

if we do it. really just like

1:12:57

share it, amplify it, be part of

1:12:59

this, all the things because again, like,

1:13:01

the thing that's magic is the number

1:13:03

of people that have done this with

1:13:05

us in the past, that have done

1:13:08

it together in the past. Honestly, part

1:13:10

of the magic is how much of

1:13:12

it stayed alive when we stopped, right?

1:13:14

How many women in medicine organizations were

1:13:16

called to them? And how many times

1:13:19

you posted in the Facebook group? I

1:13:21

was like, Ken's still out there, Ken

1:13:23

still doing it. I'm still. you know

1:13:25

in the bureaucracy of the federal government

1:13:27

I can't do anything but on the

1:13:29

Facebook group I got a notification Ken

1:13:32

posted again and so I just want

1:13:34

to say like you know there's a

1:13:36

the energy and the vitality that we

1:13:38

gave to each other and again not

1:13:40

we like we the real royal way

1:13:43

That is the first thing that I

1:13:45

think we want to capture is bringing

1:13:47

everyone back in. We put up a

1:13:49

form randomly in one Facebook group and

1:13:51

we have like 200 people that wrote

1:13:54

in saying they want to be part

1:13:56

of whatever is going on. But that's

1:13:58

a fraction of who's out there, right?

1:14:00

So like please just like share it,

1:14:02

show it, think about it, feedback. say

1:14:05

what's missing, tell what you want to

1:14:07

do, but be part of this because

1:14:09

that's the only way that it is

1:14:11

what it needs to be, which is

1:14:13

something. Please engage as best as you

1:14:16

can. That's my big call to action.

1:14:18

Dr. Chu, what would you like to

1:14:20

see? I mean, mine will be a

1:14:22

little bit about researching data, but I

1:14:24

think we are really committed to filling

1:14:27

in the blanks for people, whether there

1:14:29

are clinical gaps, understanding about policies and

1:14:31

law, or just the scope. of what

1:14:33

we're facing. And I think, I mean,

1:14:35

from a, you know, from a policy

1:14:38

and health services landscape. So I think

1:14:40

the best thing we can ask of

1:14:42

people is their curiosity. You know, so

1:14:44

if you come to the website, take

1:14:46

a look at things or just engage

1:14:49

with this topic at all questions that

1:14:51

have to do with reproductive health care

1:14:53

and emergency medicine, simple emails. or messages

1:14:55

through the website. Those are things that

1:14:57

we really absorb and think about. And

1:15:00

it's kind of like a lot like

1:15:02

calling your Congressperson, so they know what

1:15:04

matters to their constituency. It's like every

1:15:06

message we get helps drive our mission,

1:15:08

our vision, and the work that we

1:15:11

do. So I think just any sort

1:15:13

of reach out and sharing what's on

1:15:15

your mind and what you wonder about

1:15:17

is super helpful to us. So your

1:15:19

call to action then would be to

1:15:22

be curious and then have that curiosity

1:15:24

Sent to you through the website so

1:15:26

that loud. Yes. Yes. Be curious out

1:15:28

loud not just sit there and stare

1:15:30

at your naval and say I'm really

1:15:33

curious about this How how should I

1:15:35

go about answering this question? Go to

1:15:37

the website go to feminine.org and start

1:15:39

asking questions and stuff like that and

1:15:41

Jenny. What's your call to action? I

1:15:44

think for me it would be to

1:15:46

make sure you tell your friends. I

1:15:48

think that there are women in medicine

1:15:50

groups and groups under the auspices of

1:15:52

a feminine group in emergency medicine residences

1:15:55

and medical schools all across at least

1:15:57

this country and maybe other countries. And

1:15:59

you need to spread the word that

1:16:01

things are coming back. We are back,

1:16:03

we are back with a newer, bolder,

1:16:06

broader mission statement and we want everybody

1:16:08

involved, no matter what your gender identity.

1:16:10

So you're like putting the

1:16:12

band back together and going

1:16:14

on a road tour? That is

1:16:16

exactly what it felt like on

1:16:18

our first group call. I was like,

1:16:20

the band is back together. Well,

1:16:23

it's clear to me that Faminem 2.0

1:16:25

is your fight song. Yes, it is

1:16:27

your fight song. So, um... Great, the

1:16:29

SGM will be back next episode with

1:16:32

a structured critical appraisal of a recent

1:16:34

publication. We here at the SGM will

1:16:36

continue to try to cut the KT

1:16:38

window down. That's the knowledge translation window

1:16:41

down from over 10 years to less

1:16:43

than one year using the power of

1:16:45

social media. And ultimately we want to

1:16:47

see patients get the best care based

1:16:49

on the best evidence. To finish the show,

1:16:52

and because I have three guest skeptics, I'm

1:16:54

going to ask each one of you

1:16:56

to read part. of the S gem

1:16:58

tagline. It'll go, Dara Esther Jenny.

1:17:00

You're ready? What's the tagline?

1:17:02

Remember to be skeptical of

1:17:05

anything you learn. Even if

1:17:07

you heard it on the,

1:17:09

Skeptic's Guide to Emergency Medicine.

1:17:11

Talk to everyone next week.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features