Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Support for this podcast and the
0:02
following message is brought to you
0:04
by E Trade from Morgan Stanley.
0:06
With E Trade, you can dive
0:08
into the market with easy-to-use tools,
0:10
$0 commissions, and a wide range
0:12
of investments. And now there's even
0:15
more to love. Get access to
0:17
industry leading research and insights from
0:19
Morgan Stanley to help guide your
0:21
decisions. Open an account and get
0:23
up to $1,000 or more with
0:25
a qualifying deposit. Get started today
0:27
at E trade.com. Terms and other
0:29
fees apply. Ryan
0:32
Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
0:34
I don't know if you
0:36
knew this, but anyone can
0:38
get the same premium wireless
0:40
for $15 a month plan
0:42
that I've been enjoying. It's
0:44
not just for celebrities, so
0:46
do like I did, and
0:48
have one of your assistance
0:50
assistance to switch you to Mint
0:53
Mobile today. I'm told it's super
0:55
easy to do at Mint Mobile
0:57
today. I'm told it's super easy
1:00
to do at mintmobile.com. tortoise.
1:08
Hello it's Claudia here
1:10
and you're listening to
1:12
the slow newscast from tortoise.
1:15
This week how to
1:17
spend 715 million pounds.
1:19
My colleagues Kat Neelin
1:21
and Aida Barumei take
1:23
a look at how all
1:26
that money was spent over
1:28
three years by four prime
1:30
ministers on a policy that
1:32
never actually took off. The
1:34
Rwanda policy. Over to Kat.
1:37
Hello there, my name is Suzy, I'm
1:40
calling from the Home Office about your
1:42
asylum claim, is now a good time.
1:44
It's April 2024. In defiance
1:46
of a Supreme Court ruling,
1:49
Parliament has just declared Rwanda
1:51
a safe country. We're a
1:53
few months out from an election.
1:55
It's forecast for November, but
1:57
summer is small boat season. home office
1:59
they have no time to lose. You
2:02
no longer have permission to remain in
2:04
the UK. Your asylum claim has been
2:06
denied and you have exhausted all the
2:08
appeal rights available to you. If you're
2:10
the person on the other end of
2:13
this phone call it means that you've
2:15
been identified as someone who is eligible
2:17
to be sent to Rwanda. You have
2:19
a choice about how to leave the
2:22
UK. You can either do so voluntarily
2:24
or you may be forced to. We
2:26
are offering you a chance to leave
2:28
the UK voluntarily. with financial and relocation
2:30
support to make it easy for you.
2:33
If you do not, you may be
2:35
detained and forcibly removed. By this point,
2:37
the Rwanda plan has been in the
2:39
works and headlines for two years. The
2:41
policy would see people who have arrived
2:44
illegally in the UK sent to Kigali
2:46
for processing and resettlement. But the number
2:48
of people that have actually been sent?
2:50
That stands at zero. If you choose
2:52
to leave voluntarily, we are offering you
2:55
a chance to relocate to Rwanda. We
2:57
will help you leave the UK
2:59
within several days of applying and
3:01
with support with providing travel documentation,
3:04
pre-flight accommodation and booking flights. And
3:06
once you arrive, you will have
3:08
access to a reintegration package to
3:11
Rwanda. And over the course of
3:13
the policies development, we've racked up
3:15
four home secretaries. Pretty Patel, who
3:18
was its architect, Suella Braverman, who
3:20
followed her. Grant Shaps, who lasted...
3:22
Six days, Suella Braverman again, and
3:24
finally, James Cleverly. In Rwanda, you
3:27
will receive financial support, housing and
3:29
healthcare. You will receive £3,000 to
3:31
support your relocation, pay to you
3:34
on a card that can only
3:36
be used in Rwanda. You'll receive
3:38
safe and clean accommodation, free medical
3:40
insurance and tailored reintegration support to
3:43
help you resettle there. You will
3:45
be given a smartphone and a
3:47
SIM card in Rwanda to keep
3:50
you connected. James Cleveley's only
3:52
been in post since November 2023.
3:54
The Conservatives last shot at getting
3:56
a plane into the air rests
3:58
squarely on his shoulders. Rwanda is
4:00
a safe and welcoming country. They
4:02
are keen to work with us
4:04
and it's incredibly important that we
4:06
have that deterrent. The Rwanda scheme
4:09
is part of a deterrent which
4:11
is about saving lives and breaking
4:13
the business model of criminal gangs.
4:15
That's why the Prime Minister, myself
4:17
and the whole of government are
4:19
so determined to deliver on it.
4:21
The Tories argue that the Rwanda
4:23
plan will deter small boats crossing
4:25
the channel. It is central to
4:27
the party's electoral hopes. Stop the
4:29
boats is emblazoned on podiums and
4:31
repeated at every opportunity. But the
4:33
policy has never taken off and
4:35
the boats haven't stopped. You will
4:38
receive support with continuing education including
4:40
to degree level and or vocational
4:42
training in professional and technical skills
4:44
so you can establish a career
4:46
and become self-sufficient after five years.
4:48
By the time a soggy Rishi
4:50
Sunak calls the election outside number
4:52
10. A total of four people
4:54
have voluntarily agreed to go to
4:56
Rwanda. Four people. Despite legions of
4:58
officials being given this very script,
5:00
now leak to us and voiced
5:02
up. If you decline this offer,
5:04
you will not get any of
5:07
this support and may be forcibly
5:09
removed to your home country. If
5:11
we remove you forcibly, the most
5:13
likely scenario is that we will
5:15
detain you, put you on a
5:17
plane and send you to your
5:19
home country without this generous one-time
5:21
offer. We
5:23
confirm your phone number to arrange
5:25
a follow-up conversation. British taxpayers are
5:27
left with a £750 million bill,
5:30
which may still go higher, and
5:32
there's nothing to show for it,
5:34
except, finally, an itemised receipt of
5:36
exactly how much it costs to
5:38
crash land a policy. Boris Johnson
5:40
was Prime Minister and Pretty Patel
5:43
was the home secretary. The cost
5:45
of the asylum system is the
5:47
highest in over two decades. at
5:49
over 1.5 billion pounds. Part of
5:51
the cell was keeping the numbers
5:53
down, both in terms of immigrants
5:56
and the cost of the asylum
5:58
system, which had hit 3 billion
6:00
pounds the previous year and would
6:02
go on to reach a record
6:04
of 4 billion pounds in 2023.
6:06
And as the Prime Minister Mr
6:09
Speaker said last week, we cannot
6:11
sustain a parallel illegal system. This
6:13
is why the new plan for
6:15
immigration... and its legislative vehicle, the
6:17
National Antibaldus Bill are so vital.
6:19
Since then, the Guard has well
6:22
and truly changed. Four Prime Ministers,
6:24
four Home Secretaries, and five immigration
6:26
ministers. But one man has outlasted
6:28
them all. Perhaps the opponent's secretary
6:30
might be able to tell us
6:33
whether he is now satisfied of
6:35
the value for money of the
6:37
Rwanda scheme. Well I keep that
6:39
judgment under constant review as you
6:41
would expect and the circumstances have
6:43
not changed sufficiently for me to
6:46
change my judgment which from April
6:48
as you will recall was that
6:50
we did not have evidence that
6:52
it would be value for money.
6:54
It remains the case that it
6:56
could be value for money and
6:59
it could not be. I will
7:01
repeat my commitment to this committee
7:03
and to your sister committee the
7:05
public accounts committee. to update you
7:07
when the circumstances change to requiring
7:09
to change that assessment. Still to
7:12
this day, sitting in post is
7:14
the most senior civil servant in
7:16
the home office, a role he
7:18
took up in 2020, Matthew Rycroft
7:20
never did update us. The only
7:22
way he would have been able
7:25
to answer that question is if
7:27
a plane had taken off, if
7:29
the circumstances had changed. Now, with
7:31
the Tories long gone, he and
7:33
his department are drawing a line
7:35
under the policy of a previous
7:38
era. one which the current government
7:40
says it wants nothing to do
7:42
with. It's as if the taxpayer
7:44
has been left holding the tab
7:46
for a very expensive meal that
7:49
never arrived. The first item on
7:51
that eye-watering bill, the sort that
7:53
might make you wince as you
7:55
take it from the waiter, is
7:57
a... 2019 million pound payment to
7:59
Rwanda split over three years. 120
8:02
million of that was paid in
8:04
April 2022, an order to get
8:06
the whole process started. At the
8:08
same time another 20 million pounds
8:10
was handed over to cover early
8:12
operational costs. This went towards those
8:15
neat, boxy, low-rise blocks painted Sunshine
8:17
Yellow, the ones that Sorella Braverman
8:19
marvelled at on a trip to
8:21
Rwanda a year later. delighted and
8:23
excited about our partnership with Rwanda
8:25
to be creating a vibrant community
8:28
here to be a positive, secure,
8:30
beautiful haven and home for many
8:32
thousands of people. What we didn't
8:34
know at the time it was
8:36
agreed but do now is that
8:38
the deal included another million pound
8:41
tranche to be handed over the
8:43
following year and a further 50
8:45
million pound payment in 2024. If
8:47
the deal hadn't been called off,
8:49
payments were expected in years four
8:51
and five of the plan too.
8:54
Some within the home office believe
8:56
this was the first major floor
8:58
in the policy, as one official
9:00
told us. We appear to have
9:02
made a very large initial payment
9:05
to get the Rwandans to agree
9:07
to do it, and they got
9:09
to keep that money, even if
9:11
we didn't send anyone. So from
9:13
a public accounts perspective, it was
9:15
insane. You would never do that
9:18
in any other context. If a
9:20
permsect did that on an IT
9:22
contract, they would lose their job.
9:24
You would not get away with
9:26
putting so much money up front
9:28
with the other side doing nothing
9:31
except agreeing to it. Money for
9:33
nothing? Sounds like a good deal
9:35
for someone. But maybe not to
9:37
those of us picking up the
9:39
bill. And not to the treasury
9:41
either. At least, not initially. Multiple
9:44
sources told us of the extreme
9:46
skepticism with which the Chancellor at
9:48
the time. One Rishi Sunak viewed
9:50
this policy. In the words of
9:52
one former special advisor, it was
9:54
a very expensive scheme. which pitted
9:57
the treasury against those trying to
9:59
get it off the ground. That
10:01
view was shared by another former
10:03
government official who told us. As
10:05
Chancellor, he was quite skeptical because
10:07
of the cost implications and value
10:10
for money question and there was
10:12
limited evidence it would be effective
10:14
and given all the other big
10:16
spending issues he was dealing with
10:18
like social care, he was deeply
10:21
skeptical when he was in the
10:23
treasury. It says something about the
10:25
weird untouchable level of this policy.
10:27
that it then became such a
10:29
signature part of his agenda. Rwanda
10:31
wasn't necessarily always the intended partner.
10:34
Several other countries, including some in
10:36
Africa, were in the mix at
10:38
the early stages of the policy,
10:40
but either they ruled themselves out
10:42
or weren't quite the right fit.
10:44
According to one Tory source, Rwanda
10:47
was keen to help out. You
10:49
know who you call me? You've
10:51
got a problem with the refugees
10:53
and how you deal hospitably and
10:55
humanely with them. You call the
10:57
Rwandans. In the same way that
11:00
you go, do we need someone
11:02
to mediate between these two people
11:04
who want to kill each other
11:06
on site? You call the Norwegians,
11:08
or you call the Qataris. It
11:10
was the USP they wanted to
11:13
develop, and they were genuinely sincere
11:15
about it. Rwanda's president is Paul
11:17
Kigami. His politics are contentious, to
11:19
say the least. Critics accuse him
11:21
of ordering the murders of political
11:23
opponents, including exiles who have fled
11:26
the country. Having ruled
11:28
the country since 2000, he has
11:30
abolished term limits and won his
11:32
last election with 99% of the
11:34
vote. He's currently facing accusations, which
11:36
he denies, of funding the paramilitary
11:38
insurgent group M23 in neighbouring Eastern
11:40
DRC. The Rwandan economy is one
11:42
of the fastest growing on the
11:44
continent, but it's still developing, so
11:46
it's possible that some of that
11:48
money has been put to good
11:50
use. But the truth is, once
11:52
the cash was handed over, No
11:54
one back here was keeping tabs
11:56
on how it was being spent.
12:00
Total spend so far? 290 million.
12:02
People sent zero. As you scan
12:04
that restaurant bill, trying to work
12:06
out who ordered what and how
12:09
someone managed to spend so much,
12:11
the second line jumps out. 50
12:13
million pounds for what is described
12:15
as flights, escorting, airfield and impacted
12:18
police force. That's broken down as
12:20
the cost of securing flights. Escorting
12:22
detainees, preparing the airfield for any
12:25
eventual flights, and the police officers
12:27
required to keep it secure. It
12:29
feels like a lot for a
12:31
policy with no flights to show
12:34
for it, at least none with
12:36
any asylum seekers on. And it
12:38
takes us to the moment when
12:41
this policy got, perhaps, the closest
12:43
to actually taking off. It's a
12:45
clear pleasant evening on the 14th
12:47
of June 2022. At Boscombe Down
12:50
Airfield in Wiltshire, There's a plane
12:52
sitting on a runway destined for
12:54
Rwanda. Seven people are expecting the
12:57
journey to be one way. It
12:59
would later emerge that one man
13:01
on board was strapped to his
13:03
seat, his arms and head restrained,
13:06
after he told his security guards
13:08
he would rather die than get
13:10
on the plane. Back in the
13:13
home office itself, anticipation is mounting.
13:15
Could this be the moment the
13:17
policy becomes reality? And what does
13:19
that mean if it does? There
13:22
were a series of rulings in
13:24
quick succession. The High Court, Supreme
13:26
Court, Court of Appeal. There were
13:29
lots of people who thought it
13:31
would get killed in one of
13:33
those, and of course it didn't.
13:35
So we were sitting there thinking,
13:38
oh shit, we actually have to
13:40
do this. But the minutes ticked
13:42
by, and the plane doesn't move.
13:44
A last-minute judgment from the Strasbourg-based
13:47
European Court of Human Rights arrives
13:49
in the nick of time. The
13:51
flight is cancelled. It's back to
13:54
the drawing board. And another 500,000
13:56
pounds is added to the bill.
14:00
Later that year, there are reports
14:03
that the Home Office is once
14:05
again approaching airlines to provide planes
14:07
for the flights to Kigali. The
14:09
New Yorker-based airline, Privileged Style, has
14:11
pulled out reportedly after pressure from
14:13
campaign groups. Speculation that no airline
14:15
was willing to take on the
14:17
reputational burden morphs into speculation that
14:19
the government will be ripped off
14:21
by whoever eventually agrees to take
14:23
the hit. At one point, even
14:25
Ryanair's Michael O'Leary gets involved, offering
14:27
to quote for the business if
14:29
he has spare aircraft sitting around.
14:31
But it doesn't come to that.
14:33
Charter Group Air Tanker ends up
14:35
taking on the job, though it
14:37
remains tight-lipped about the nature of
14:40
the agreement. Contradicting this sense of
14:42
chaos, one Tory source told us
14:44
the team had no real problem
14:46
securing a company. People are going,
14:48
you know, is it difficult? Does
14:50
no one want to do it?
14:52
It's like no, we're all sorted.
14:54
The system's working fine. That bit
14:56
of it was easy. First of
14:58
all, they were on contract. So
15:00
uncomfortable though it may have been,
15:02
I don't know, I never tested
15:04
it. The point was, you have
15:06
a contract to do stuff. So
15:08
that's what we're doing. While no
15:10
flights with asylum seekers were ever
15:12
sent to Rwanda as part of
15:14
this policy, Tory ministers managed to
15:17
rack up more than 400,000 pounds
15:19
for their visits back and forth,
15:21
including a day trip by James
15:23
clever. at the cost of £165,000,
15:25
a figure that comes on top
15:27
of the rest of the bill.
15:29
But really, flights were just the
15:31
tip of the iceberg for this
15:33
part of the bill. All that
15:35
has been published so far is
15:37
the 50 million pound combined figure.
15:39
But tortoise has established a further
15:41
breakdown. We can reveal that the
15:43
lion's share, 37.8 million pounds, was
15:45
soaked up by the cost of
15:47
escorting. That's hiring and training security
15:49
guards. as well as 6.4 million
15:51
pounds on renting a secret facility
15:54
in which to train them. A
15:56
further 8 million pounds was spent
15:58
on preparing the airfield for those
16:00
flights with 4 million pounds covering
16:02
the cost of policing the airfield.
16:04
And so, the bill ticks up yet
16:06
again. Total spend, 340 million
16:09
pounds. People sent zero.
16:11
While it's true that in the
16:13
grand scheme of running a country,
16:15
the amount spent on the Rwanda
16:18
policy is small change. The kicker
16:20
is that we never got anything
16:23
for any of that money. And,
16:25
as cost for the policy mounted
16:27
up, resources were increasingly being diverted
16:29
away from other parts of the
16:31
home office. Two sources told us
16:33
that by the final stages, there were
16:35
a thousand people working on the policy.
16:38
Fewer than a hundred had been recruited
16:40
specifically, while the rest came from
16:42
elsewhere within the home office. That
16:44
meant that in the race to get
16:46
Rwanda over the line, other important
16:49
pieces of government work couldn't be
16:51
done. As one, current civil servant told
16:53
us. It wasn't the fact that
16:55
it was just an astronomical amount
16:57
of money, because at the time we were
16:59
starting to talk about budget cuts elsewhere. It
17:01
felt a bit like just a misuse of
17:03
money, rather than it being a huge cost.
17:05
I think it was a bit like we
17:07
could be using this money elsewhere, like why
17:09
are we spending it on this policy
17:11
specifically? It's a fair question, but it's
17:13
not one those of us on the outside could
17:16
ask, because at the time we didn't know how
17:18
much was being taken to a restaurant. and
17:20
having to pay for the table next to
17:22
you and someone there ordered the lobster. Even
17:24
senior MPs like Labour's Meg Hillier who
17:26
chaired the Public Accounts Committee in the
17:28
last Parliament couldn't get a straight answer.
17:30
So producing information in the annual accounts
17:33
which is 15 months after the last
17:35
100 million pounds payment was made to
17:37
Rwanda is not acceptable. What is the
17:39
problem about just being open and honest
17:41
about something you signed off as Chancellor
17:43
that you're now championing as Prime Minister
17:45
that's a five-year program? What's the secrecy?
17:48
What's the secrecyacy. because as we've been
17:50
very clear it may well be that we
17:52
want to have other conversations with other countries.
17:54
This is one of those favoured party
17:56
lines, the argument being that the details
17:58
of those deals... need to be kept
18:01
secret so that other negotiations happening with
18:03
theoretical undisclosed countries aren't jeopardised. Which other
18:05
countries are you thinking of having a
18:08
conversation? It wouldn't be right to talk
18:10
about these things if we're having private
18:12
conversations with countries about potential alternatives to
18:14
add to our UN policy. You've always
18:17
been clear that that is something that
18:19
the government would like to explain. I
18:21
mean, I've been on the public accounts
18:23
committee now for 13 for 12 years
18:26
and... I'm aware of lots of things
18:28
that are talked about as being commercially
18:30
confidential and when we ask to see
18:32
the papers they're not at all. I
18:35
cannot see nor can other members of
18:37
my committee what is commercially confidential about
18:39
this that will still, will won't be
18:41
commercially confidential when the accounts are produced.
18:44
There isn't an arbitrary timeline when something
18:46
stops being commercially confidential and then does.
18:48
and is no longer confidential. There is
18:50
no reason to have a 15-month delay.
18:53
And if you're wondering how the Public
18:55
Accounts Committee managed to get hold of
18:57
the numbers they're talking about. The only
18:59
reason this money was revealed was because
19:02
somebody in Rwanda, possibly inadvertently, we don't
19:04
know. There's an inquiry going on and
19:06
released it to the International Monetary Fund,
19:08
which itself is instructive, is it not?
19:11
You know, I think we probably just
19:13
have a different point of view on
19:15
this. Meg Hillier is asking a pretty
19:17
simple question here. I think you understand
19:20
those rules very clearly, so can we
19:22
just be really clear? Why are you
19:24
not, sharing with Parliament and the public
19:26
the money being spent on their Rwanda
19:29
scheme? It's a five-year project, you signed
19:31
your office, Chancellor, you must have been
19:33
content then despite you now having to
19:35
pass legislation to operaization, opera, operaisation. Why
19:38
did you not think about asking those
19:40
questions? Then you must have been asking
19:42
those questions, why can't you share that
19:44
money with us? The money with us.
19:47
There's a balance to be struck. There
19:49
is annual transparency of these numbers to
19:51
Parliament. I think that's right. Prime Minister,
19:53
it is no, it is not the
19:56
normal transparency Prime Minister that is provided.
19:58
On other big projects, like for example
20:00
High Speed 2, Take 1, I could
20:02
give you many other examples, we were
20:05
receiving six monthly reports laid to Parliament.
20:07
That is the normal approach and is
20:09
normal to negotiate this with the public
20:11
accounts committee on a routine basis. We
20:14
do that regularly with other departments. of
20:16
yours, what is there to hide? There
20:18
should be nothing to hide. Item number
20:20
three on the bill is described as
20:23
fixed detention and reception centre investment. That's
20:25
civil service speak for finding space to
20:27
detain people while they wait for a
20:29
flight that might never take off. Since
20:32
the last attempted flight, Parliament has in
20:34
some cases reluctantly passed laws paving the
20:36
way for removals to begin. Official severe
20:38
marked the last Tuesday in April 2024
20:41
as the point at which people will
20:43
be lifted. For weeks the Home Office
20:45
has been emptying the estate to create
20:47
capacity, processing claims or relocating people into
20:50
hotels to make space for those who
20:52
have been identified as suitable for a
20:54
one-way trip to Kigali. And so, on
20:56
a brisk spring morning all over the
20:59
country, People thinking that their asylum claims
21:01
are being processed make their way to
21:03
reporting centres. On most occasions it's a
21:05
straightforward visit. You check in, sign your
21:08
name and leave. It's designed to keep
21:10
track of people who, because of the
21:12
delays in the system, have to wait
21:14
for months and months to find out
21:17
if their application has been successful. But
21:19
on this particular Tuesday, the Home Office
21:21
has something else in mind. As asylum
21:23
seekers were taken away in handcuffs, protesters
21:26
sang their support for the men. It
21:28
was filmed by a friend of the
21:30
man just about to be led out.
21:32
He was loaded into an immigration detention
21:35
van. He'd come for his regular fortnightly
21:37
appointment at the home office building in
21:39
Loughborough when he was detained. Once they're
21:41
rounded up and sent to detention centres,
21:44
the government has a 28-day window to
21:46
get them on a flight to Rwanda
21:48
before people can start seeking bail. The
21:50
clock is ticking and once again those
21:53
working on the policy think it might
21:55
finally happen. The laws have been passed,
21:57
the planes have been secured and the
21:59
people were locked up. It's true that
22:02
legal challenges were... slowing things down but
22:04
there was a hope expectation of breaking
22:06
the log jam. And then of course
22:08
he called the election and we were
22:11
just like why? You could have gone
22:13
until January and if this was your
22:15
key priority you were pretty close. I
22:17
think we would have got some people
22:20
out. There may not have been many
22:22
people on it but a flight would
22:24
have gone. And that was that. Total
22:26
spend £445 million pounds. People sent zero.
23:34
What makes a great pair of glasses?
23:36
At Warby Parker, it's all
23:38
the invisible extras, without
23:40
the extra cost. Their
23:43
designer quality frames start
23:45
at $95, including prescription
23:47
lenses, plus scratch-resistant, smund-resistant,
23:49
and anti-reflective coatings, and UV
23:51
protection, and free adjustments
23:54
for life. To find your next
23:56
pair of glasses, sunglasses or contact
23:58
lenses, or to find the Warby
24:00
Parker store nearest you, head over
24:03
to Warby parker.com. the
30:02
UN. The cost of the legal
30:04
challenges mount up with every
30:06
case whether the home office
30:08
wins or loses and when
30:10
combined with everything else that
30:12
takes the total spend to
30:14
715 million pounds. People sent
30:17
zero. Except that's not strictly
30:19
true. Some people did go. We
30:21
paid for them. That call centre
30:24
back and forth you heard at
30:26
the start of the episode was
30:28
a real script. used by home
30:30
office officials to entice failed asylum
30:32
seekers to volunteer for a one-way
30:34
trip to Rwanda. We're told this kind
30:36
of package is not unusual, but the
30:38
fact of pushing this specific country is.
30:40
For critics this is further proof
30:43
of, as one well-placed source put it,
30:45
the insane level of resources that went
30:47
into just proving the concept, there were
30:49
loads of people in the home office
30:51
making phone calls and using this script.
30:53
But the concept was never proved. Sending
30:56
volunteers who have gone through the system
30:58
and failed is not the same as
31:00
deporting people the minute they arrive and
31:02
leaving it to a third country to
31:04
figure out if they have a legitimate
31:06
case. There are some who still believe the
31:08
policy remains viable. If we
31:11
enact all the legislation and properly
31:13
operation lies, it is fundamentally a
31:15
policy that can work. The uptick in
31:17
the number of returns, thanks to the
31:19
changes that have been made, shows that
31:22
it's perfectly possible to remove people. Others,
31:24
who think it could have worked, but
31:26
that its value was only as part
31:28
of a suite of measures, which ultimately
31:30
got sidelined in the Tories' pursuit of
31:32
a headline-grabbing flight. I reject the idea
31:35
that the policy itself was fucked. It
31:37
was a sensible policy concept but just
31:39
became totemic and wrapped up in a wider
31:41
thing. There is a world in which it would have
31:44
worked, if Boris and Priti had seen it
31:46
through. But would it have ended the migration
31:48
problem? No. They were treating it like a
31:50
silver bullet like a talking to a mate. There
31:52
are many who believe Rwanda was a costly
31:54
red herring and that resources should have been
31:57
focused elsewhere. If they'd put more energy into
31:59
speeding up decision-making... Would Ryan
34:23
Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
34:25
The message for everyone paying big
34:27
wireless way too much. Please for
34:29
the love of everything good
34:31
in this world stop. With
34:33
Mint you can get premium
34:35
wireless for just $15 a month.
34:38
Of course if you enjoy
34:40
overpaying, no judgments, but that's
34:42
weird. Okay, one judgment. Anyway,
34:45
give it a try at
34:47
mintmobile.com/switch. Up front payment of
34:50
$45 for three month plan,
35:19
Support for this podcast and the
35:21
following message is brought to you
35:23
by E Trade from Morgan Stanley.
35:25
With E Trade, you can dive
35:27
into the market with easy-to-use tools,
35:29
$0 commissions, and a wide range
35:31
of investments. And now there's even
35:33
more to love. Get access to
35:36
industry leading research and insights from
35:38
Morgan Stanley to help guide your
35:40
decisions. Open an account and get
35:42
up to $1,000 or more with
35:44
a qualifying deposit. Get started today
35:46
at E trade.com. Terms and other
35:48
fees apply. contact
36:09
lenses, or a new prescription, new you
36:11
know where to look. To find
36:13
a Warby Parker store near you or
36:15
to book an eye exam, book head over
36:17
to head over.com slash retail. retail.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More