Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome back to the show everybody. Mark
0:02
Manson here and this is the last
0:04
podcast of the subtle art of not
0:06
giving a fuck podcast. Yes, the rumors
0:09
are true, the hints have been true,
0:11
all of the little breadcrumbs that I've
0:13
been dropping over the past few episodes
0:15
are in fact true. We are shutting
0:18
down this podcast, but we're shutting it
0:20
down because we're going to launch something
0:22
very new and exciting in its place
0:24
and I just want to take a
0:26
little bit of time to explain both
0:28
the reasoning why we're shutting this down
0:31
and then also what's coming next. So
0:33
bear with me for a little bit.
0:35
I'm going to take you behind the
0:37
scenes, kind of my personal thinking or
0:39
my personal experience with the podcast the
0:41
past year, what my reasoning has been,
0:43
and why we are making the changes
0:45
that we're going to make, and also
0:47
why I'm extremely excited. And I think
0:50
you guys are going to be absolutely thrilled
0:52
with what we produce instead of
0:54
the subtle not giving a fuck
0:56
podcast. So let's get right into
0:58
it. The first thing I want to say
1:00
is that it feels kind of
1:02
insane to shut down something
1:05
this successful. I was actually
1:07
looking at the numbers in
1:09
preparation for recording this. So
1:12
we had 75 episodes, over
1:14
30 million downloads, over 700,000
1:16
followers across platforms. That technically
1:18
puts us in the top
1:21
0.01% of podcasts, like the
1:23
top 400-ish podcast in the
1:25
world. is a massively successful
1:27
podcast by any objective
1:30
measurement, which is still a
1:32
little bit wild for me to think
1:34
about. And I also, I think
1:36
it's worth saying too that shutting
1:38
this down is not a good
1:40
business decision, at least in the
1:42
short term. There were multiple seven
1:44
figure offers on the table from
1:46
major podcast networks, major ad networks
1:48
that we turned down. and a
1:51
big reason for turning those down
1:53
is going to be clear in
1:55
a little bit, but I just
1:57
want to make it clearly like
1:59
this change. is really not for
2:01
the money. It's not like we're
2:03
not selling out in any way,
2:05
shape or form. In fact, it's
2:07
from a business point of view,
2:09
I might just be shooting myself
2:11
in the foot here. But I
2:13
think it's gonna be worth it.
2:15
I think everything that we're gonna
2:17
be producing and putting out is
2:19
absolutely gonna be worth it. And
2:21
five years from now, I'm gonna
2:23
look back and be like, this
2:25
is one of the best decisions.
2:27
So when I look at why.
2:29
I wanted to end the show,
2:31
there are two primary reasons. And
2:33
the first one is honestly just
2:35
purely selfish. And that is, I
2:37
wasn't really having a ton of
2:39
fun doing the show. And maybe
2:41
I was a parent to some
2:43
of you, maybe it wasn't, but
2:45
it became... impossible for me to
2:47
ignore past a certain point. I
2:49
mean, initially, say the first six
2:51
or eight months, like there was
2:53
kind of this honeymoon period, everything's
2:55
new, everything's exciting, but like really
2:57
once the show got going last
2:59
summer, it was painfully aware to
3:01
me that like, this is just
3:03
not really my thing. And we
3:05
tried to experiment with formats, you
3:07
know, we tried to introduce segments
3:10
to the show, Drew and I
3:12
tried to get a little bit.
3:14
playful and creative with some of
3:16
the topics that we'd address. We
3:18
started taking listener questions a lot
3:20
more. We tried to get a
3:22
little bit experimental with like guests
3:24
that we would bring on, but
3:26
it just never sat right. The
3:28
simple reason why is that I've
3:30
been in this industry for almost
3:32
20 years now, and my thing,
3:34
probably the reason that most of
3:36
you even give a shit that
3:38
I'm talking right now, is I
3:40
try to be independent-minded. I try
3:42
to say things that maybe need
3:44
to be said and nobody else
3:46
is really saying. I'm contrarian when
3:48
maybe it's not so popular to
3:50
be contrarian. I call bullshit when
3:52
I see it. And in the
3:54
classic podcast format of bringing on
3:56
kind of star intellectual guess and
3:58
thought leaders. I felt completely hamstrung
4:00
to be able to do that.
4:02
It is a format that is
4:04
antithetical in almost every shape and
4:06
form to ultimately what I think
4:08
I'm best at and what I
4:10
enjoy doing most in my line
4:12
of work. And that sucks. It
4:14
really sucks to have a notable
4:16
guest come on the show and
4:18
start saying something that I actually
4:20
kind of don't agree with or...
4:22
I'm like familiar with the research
4:24
they're talking about, but I don't
4:26
think the research is very good.
4:28
And it puts me in a
4:30
really tough spot of like, okay,
4:32
do I start challenging this guest
4:34
and potentially creating like a big
4:37
argument or a debate on the
4:39
show, potentially alienating the guests, themselves,
4:41
making sure that they're never going
4:43
to come back to the show?
4:45
Do I put myself in a
4:47
position where I'm like suddenly, like
4:49
I didn't prep for a debate
4:51
coming into this episode, but now
4:53
like suddenly I'm having to put
4:55
myself in a headspace of being
4:57
willing to argue and debate a
4:59
really smart person? It was just
5:01
not fun for me. It felt
5:03
like a no-win situation. I can
5:05
either start to fight and make
5:07
everybody miserable, make me miserable, make
5:09
the guest miserable, and make the
5:11
fans of the guest miserable. Or
5:13
I can sit there and smile
5:15
and not along and pretend like
5:17
everything's hunky-dory and also be miserable,
5:19
right? And I experimented with both
5:21
directions and nothing ever felt right.
5:23
And nothing ever felt right with
5:25
the audience either. And I should
5:27
add too that like the whole
5:29
process of sourcing, reaching out, booking,
5:31
guess, aftergast, aftergast, aftergast, it's kind
5:33
of this very unpleasant treadmill. First
5:35
of all, everybody in this space
5:37
is having the same guests on
5:39
over and over again. So you're
5:41
fighting with other podcasts to get
5:43
the same people on. And then
5:45
when you do get them on,
5:47
they kind of just say the
5:49
same thing they said on the
5:51
other podcast that they went on.
5:53
And if you try to get
5:55
them off the thing that they
5:57
said on the other podcast that
5:59
they went on, then they don't
6:02
really want to talk about some
6:04
other thing that you want to
6:06
talk about. And it like. I
6:08
understand that like really good podcasters
6:10
or that like that's the skill
6:12
set that they're experts at like
6:14
getting a new guest and getting
6:16
them to open up in a
6:18
new way and talk about something
6:20
that they've never talked about or
6:22
like researching really intensely and finding
6:24
that subject matter that like they've
6:26
never really been super public about.
6:28
I just found that like I
6:30
don't really care to get good
6:32
at that. That's not my thing.
6:34
And I don't think it's the
6:36
thing that I am best at.
6:38
I don't think it's the thing
6:40
I'm particularly talented at. It's definitely
6:42
not the thing I enjoy. And
6:44
I don't think it's the thing
6:46
that you guys are here for.
6:48
So what the fuck am I
6:50
doing? Trying to do that, like
6:52
trying to like get these super
6:54
spicy breaking guest interviews going. So
6:56
the whole guest thing was just
6:58
kind of, it's a little bit
7:00
of a non-starter for me. And
7:02
don't get me wrong, like some
7:04
of the guests who came on
7:06
the show, I had a fucking
7:08
blast with and had great conversations
7:10
with and had great conversations with
7:12
and had great conversations with, with,
7:14
with, with, with, you know there
7:16
are a lot of guests that
7:18
came on that I was just
7:20
kind of like going through the
7:22
motions and it's one of those
7:24
situations where I have to take
7:26
my own advice and you know
7:29
I'm constantly telling my audience that
7:31
the more you care about something
7:33
the better you'll be at it
7:35
and the more impactful it will
7:37
be to other people and here
7:39
I am just going through the
7:41
motions working on something that I
7:43
don't deeply care about I don't
7:45
think I'm super great at and
7:47
not only am I paying the
7:49
price as well. So starting a
7:51
few months ago it became abundantly
7:53
clear that some sort of pivot
7:55
needed to be made and Drew
7:57
and I started talking very seriously
7:59
about what if we just reboot
8:01
the whole show entirely and start
8:03
from first principles. Before I get
8:05
into that though I do I
8:07
want to go on a little
8:09
bit of a rant here. Because
8:11
having been in the self-help personal
8:13
development podcast world now for a
8:15
couple of years, I'm like a
8:17
little alarmed by what kind of
8:19
flies in this space, not to
8:21
say that like, you know, the
8:23
shows are bad or the advice
8:25
that's being given is bad. It's
8:27
just, I don't think the incentives
8:29
are very healthy at the moment.
8:31
So... In the creator or influencer
8:33
world, there's a concept that's relatively
8:35
well known in my industry, known
8:37
as audience capture. And chances are
8:39
you guys have seen this among
8:41
people that you followed over the
8:43
years. Like, often somebody will build
8:45
an audience among a certain demographic
8:47
or a certain group of people
8:49
who have like some crazy belief,
8:51
right? The creator or the podcaster
8:53
or the YouTubeer like they realize
8:56
that if they if they just
8:58
keep hitting that crazy topic over
9:00
and over again tens of
9:02
thousands hundreds of thousands of people
9:04
keep showing up in force and
9:06
engaging with them over and over
9:08
again. And so what you see
9:10
is that the influencer actually starts
9:12
to take on those crazy beliefs
9:14
and that personality of this like
9:16
segment of their audience that they've
9:18
suddenly captured. And so it's like
9:20
it's almost like being brainwashed by
9:22
your audience. Like you're rewarded for
9:24
feeding into their kind of crazy
9:26
beliefs or narratives. And so the
9:28
the the podcaster or the Youtuber
9:30
kind of convinces themselves that they
9:32
believe those things. Don't feel any
9:34
cognitive dissonance when they when they
9:36
keep putting out the content that
9:38
that audience wants and Audience capture
9:40
is a very real thing I've
9:42
seen it happen in my industry
9:44
many many times It's something I'm
9:46
very careful about and aware of
9:48
with myself that I like really
9:50
try to check myself and make
9:52
sure it's not happening to me
9:54
But I think there's something specific
9:56
to the podcasting world that is
9:58
similar to audience capture, but it's
10:00
a little bit different and I
10:02
would call that guest capture Which
10:04
is, you end up with these
10:06
incentives like, okay, fuck it. I'll
10:08
just, I'll use a real person
10:10
as an example. because there's no
10:12
way in fucking hell I would
10:14
ever have this person on the
10:16
show. Take Joe to Spencer, for
10:18
example, right? Joe to Spencer, he's
10:20
like kind of the new big
10:22
self-help guru, he's doing these massive
10:24
seminars and like arenas and stuff.
10:26
And when you look at his
10:28
content, it's really, it's kind of
10:30
just the secret 2.0. Like it's,
10:32
you know, meditate, breathwork, manifestation, believe
10:35
in yourself, you can be and
10:37
do anything. It's a bunch of
10:39
bullshit. Like we've been here before
10:41
before, right. If you have him
10:43
on your show, it's like a
10:45
guaranteed four to five million person
10:47
audience. Like his audience is massive
10:49
and it is absolutely rabid. They
10:51
consume every single thing he touches.
10:53
And so I have quietly watched
10:55
as multiple people in my space
10:57
continually bring them on their shows
10:59
and let him spout his quantum
11:01
theory bullshit over and over again.
11:03
And I'm not like singling out
11:05
Joe dispensers like... He's not uniquely
11:07
bad in any way. He's just
11:09
an example, right? Because it's like
11:11
I understand what those podcasters are
11:13
going through. Like I know for
11:15
a fact that some of those
11:17
podcasters don't believe any of the
11:19
stuff that he says, but they
11:21
still bring him on the show
11:23
and they placate him and they
11:25
humor him and they let him
11:27
like go on his spiel about
11:29
manifesting and quantum spirits and whatever.
11:31
And then they let the, you
11:33
know, the four million views or
11:35
the five million downloads come in.
11:37
And then they, you know, they
11:39
move on to the next guest.
11:41
And to me, that just feels
11:43
like a certain level of prostituting
11:45
oneself. And it's like, I find
11:47
it very distasteful, but I understand
11:49
the impulse to do that. Like,
11:51
as a podcaster myself, I want
11:53
to bring on guests that are
11:55
going to bring in massive audiences.
11:57
And so to bring on somebody
11:59
with a huge audience, I want
12:01
to at least placate or goal.
12:03
with whatever they say and act
12:05
as though I agree with it
12:07
or at least don't disagree with
12:09
it because then that will convert
12:11
their audience into my audience. I
12:13
felt myself being pulled in this
12:15
direction while having notable people on
12:17
the show and it just it
12:19
made me feel very gross and
12:21
it felt it went against everything
12:23
that I think I stand for
12:25
in this in this industry and
12:27
in this market and I don't
12:29
want to get sucked down that
12:31
and so The first thing I
12:33
will say about the new show
12:36
that we're going to launch is
12:38
that there will be no guests
12:40
on it. That doesn't mean that
12:42
we're not going to talk to
12:44
experts, we're actually going to talk
12:46
to a lot of experts, but
12:48
we're going to talk to them
12:50
behind the scenes. We're going to
12:52
talk to them behind the scenes.
12:54
We're going to talk to experts
12:56
who don't have audiences. We're going
12:58
to talk to academics. We're going
13:00
to talk to experts. people's ideas
13:02
and perspectives, and be able to
13:04
criticize them openly and show the
13:06
pros and cons of certain viewpoints
13:08
and not feel socially pressured or
13:10
audience pressured into going along with
13:12
certain things that maybe I don't
13:14
believe in or that frankly the
13:16
research doesn't back up. Okay, second
13:18
gripe, and again this is something
13:20
that I think is a wider
13:22
problem in the personal development podcast
13:24
space, but I've also experienced that
13:26
on our show as well, is
13:28
that you can have one guest
13:30
on one week and they'll tell
13:32
you X, Y, Z, and then
13:34
you have another guest on two
13:36
weeks later and they say the
13:38
exact opposite of X, Y, Z.
13:40
And again, I feel put in
13:42
a bind whenever that happens. I
13:44
struggle, like, how should I contextualize
13:46
this? Well, shit, like, is this
13:48
guy line or was the guy
13:50
two weeks ago line? Like, should
13:52
I bring this up? I think
13:54
it's it's beautiful to have podcast.
13:56
with a wide variety of perspectives
13:58
and views, but I do think
14:00
there needs to be some cohesion
14:02
or clarity around like, you know,
14:04
what's legitimate, what's not. Like, certain
14:06
viewpoints have more evidence behind them
14:08
than others. But when you present
14:10
everything as just another guest saying
14:12
another thing, like that gets lost
14:14
in the mix. And again, I.
14:16
I think the context is so
14:18
important and the context is not
14:20
being featured. It's like being left
14:22
behind the scenes. So when Drew
14:24
and I sat down and we
14:26
were like, really just, what do
14:28
we want to build from first
14:30
principles? And not only what do
14:32
we want to build, but also
14:34
like, what do we feel like
14:36
this space needs? What is it
14:39
lacking? What is the show that
14:41
needs to exist, but nobody's making
14:43
at the moment? And the conclusion
14:45
that we came to is that
14:47
the space needs. a very serious
14:49
deep dive into individual topics. And
14:51
when I say serious deep dive,
14:53
I mean like extremely thorough vetting
14:55
multiple perspectives, vetting research from multiple
14:57
places, walking through the history and
14:59
context and. train of thought that
15:01
occurred from one generation to the
15:03
next of thinkers and researchers, like
15:05
really giving a fully fleshed out
15:07
view of a single subject, instead
15:09
of just, you know, bringing on,
15:11
you know, Joe Blow academic or,
15:13
you know, Jane Smith influencer and
15:15
asking them the same questions. So
15:17
we really want to do like
15:19
a full, thorough, comprehensive guide. to
15:21
a single subject matter and just
15:23
simply include all of the varying
15:25
perspectives of experts within that single
15:27
episode. And so that's what we're
15:29
gonna do. They're gonna be longer
15:31
episodes and they're gonna be posted
15:33
less frequently. And the idea is
15:35
that every time you listen to
15:37
an episode, whatever the topic is.
15:39
whether it's procrastination or managing your
15:41
emotions or discovering your values, the
15:43
idea, Drew and I's North Star
15:45
as we're putting this together with
15:47
our team, is that this should
15:49
be the last podcast episode that
15:51
you ever have to listen to
15:53
on this subject, that if you
15:55
get through this episode of this
15:57
podcast on this subject, every other
15:59
podcast that comes up on that
16:01
subject is gonna feel repetitive and
16:03
like a waste of time. Because
16:05
you've already done it. You've already
16:07
been through the entire mix. You've
16:09
gotten all the information. You have
16:11
all the takeaways and you know
16:13
exactly how to implement it into
16:15
your life. That is our goal.
16:17
And that promise of being the
16:19
last podcast you ever need, we're
16:21
keeping that promise with ourselves. Our
16:23
goal with every episode that we
16:25
make is that we can never
16:27
come back to this topic. or
16:29
at least until there's like some
16:31
new breakthrough discovery or research, we're
16:33
never coming back to this topic.
16:35
This needs to be completely soup
16:37
the nuts, A to Z, cover
16:40
every single base. So like, let's
16:42
get it right. The other thing
16:44
about this show is that it's
16:46
gonna be ad-free. This is another
16:48
incentive issue, I think, in this
16:50
space, is that as somebody who
16:52
is doling out life advice, there's
16:54
a lot of incentives that come
16:56
from sponsorships and a lot of
16:58
companies to want to push certain
17:00
products or relationships and I mean
17:02
some of them I feel confident
17:04
with I mean a lot of
17:06
the sponsors on this show are
17:08
products that I've used or I
17:10
actively do use but there's a
17:12
lot of situations where a company
17:14
shows up with a lot of
17:16
money and they want you to
17:18
say and do some things and
17:20
again I just don't want to
17:22
deal with that. On top of
17:24
that every single episode is going
17:26
to come with a full PDF
17:28
summary and guide. all of the
17:30
sources citations and notes it's going
17:32
to be a full summary of
17:34
the episode it's going to include
17:36
everything that Drew and I talk
17:38
about it's going to have all
17:40
of the book recommendations and the
17:42
experts that we talk to. Some
17:44
of these PDFs, we're working on
17:46
the third episode now. Some of
17:48
these PDFs are like pushing 80,
17:50
90 pages. They are absolutely massive.
17:52
I mean, honestly, it's crazy. I
17:54
honestly believe some of these episodes
17:56
are more valuable than entire books
17:58
written on these subjects, and we're
18:00
just gonna give it out for
18:02
free. It's just gonna be available
18:04
to all you guys each month
18:06
as it comes out. So the
18:08
new show, it's gonna be called
18:10
Sol. Because the idea is that
18:12
if you listen to the episode
18:14
and you pay attention and you
18:16
actually fucking do the thing in
18:18
the episode, you do the takeaways,
18:20
you implement it into your life,
18:22
that area of your life should
18:24
be solved. It should no longer
18:26
be an open question. You should
18:28
no longer feel a need to
18:30
go read another book or go
18:32
hire another coach. If there's one
18:34
thing that I've learned over the
18:36
past year with a bunch of
18:38
the live events that I've done,
18:40
like meeting a lot of you
18:43
guys in person, doing a lot
18:45
of speaking, it seems like The
18:47
number one issue everyone has at
18:49
the moment is that there's information
18:51
overload, but there's no implementation. There's
18:53
no clear roadmap of like, okay,
18:55
well, cool, I just like listen
18:57
this three hour conversation with this
18:59
doctor, but like, I don't know
19:01
what to actually go do. And
19:03
so the goal of this new
19:05
podcast is not only to give
19:07
you. all of the necessary information,
19:09
but it's to give you also
19:11
the implementation along the way, to
19:13
make it clear of like, okay,
19:15
these are actually like just the
19:17
four questions you should be focusing
19:19
on, and these are the three
19:21
things that you should do first,
19:23
and if you do this, this,
19:25
and this, then you're probably good.
19:27
The Salt Podcast will be launching
19:29
on May 1st. If you're subscribed
19:31
to this podcast feed on Apple
19:33
or Spotify or any other audio
19:35
platform, you will automatically be subscribed
19:37
to the Solve Feed. the subtle
19:39
art feed over to Solved. If
19:41
you're subscribed on YouTube and watching
19:43
this on YouTube, we are going
19:45
to move the Solved podcast back
19:47
to the main Mark Manson channel.
19:49
So if you're not subscribed to
19:51
the Mark Manson channel, you should
19:53
go there, get subscribed, because that's
19:55
where the first Solved episode is
19:57
going to be dropped on May
19:59
1st. We're also getting away from
20:01
like, you know, every other Tuesday or
20:03
Monday morning, release schedules. We're just
20:06
dropping episodes on the first of
20:08
every single month. So the first
20:10
episode will be May 1st, the
20:12
second episode will be June 1st,
20:14
the third episode will be July
20:16
1st. The idea is that these
20:18
are long-term, slow-burn commitments that you
20:20
guys make. You can work through
20:22
an episode at your leisure. The
20:24
episodes are pretty long. I'm gonna
20:26
warn you, like we're looking... three,
20:29
four, five hours long, but you
20:31
can take your time with it.
20:33
You can listen to it slowly
20:35
over multiple days or multiple weeks.
20:37
You can work your way through
20:40
the PDF guide. Everything's gonna come
20:42
with accompanying exercises and implementations. So
20:44
you can like really just let it
20:46
savor in your brain a little bit.
20:48
Just like let it based like
20:50
a turkey on Thanksgiving. And finally,
20:52
I do have to say like
20:55
this. experiment this phase of my
20:57
career this podcast has it really
20:59
it's been wonderful it's something that
21:01
that I I probably should have
21:04
done like five years ago and
21:06
and honestly if I did start
21:08
this podcast five or six years
21:10
ago maybe Maybe things would be
21:12
different. Maybe I would stick with this
21:14
format. Maybe we would be doing maybe
21:17
we would be doing the same fucking
21:19
guest treadmill that everybody else is doing.
21:21
I don't know. All I know is
21:23
that like this has been a really
21:25
rewarding project over the last year and
21:27
a half. It's it's built a wonderful
21:30
audience that is so much more engaged
21:32
than a lot of other places that
21:34
I post or a lot of other
21:36
content that I put online. It has
21:38
introduced me to a lot of amazing
21:41
people, like a lot of the guests that
21:43
I have had on are just like awesome
21:45
people that I'm so grateful that I am
21:47
able to know and be in touch with.
21:49
So it has given me a lot and
21:51
I am very thankful for it. I
21:54
just also think it's not the right
21:56
thing for me. I don't like this, it's
21:58
not a right fit for me. it's what
22:00
you guys want from me either. And
22:02
so, solved is my attempt to A,
22:04
get right with what I want to
22:07
make. Like this is what I would
22:09
want to listen to in this market
22:11
that nobody's making. So, fuck it. Like,
22:13
let me go make it. And I
22:15
also think it's what you guys want
22:17
to hear too. I think it's what
22:19
you guys are going to be more
22:21
interested in. You know, I don't think
22:24
you guys need another like, you know,
22:26
fucking morning routine and... to listen to
22:28
the same dude who's been on 18
22:30
other podcasts to promote his book. Like
22:32
that's just, it's not interesting to me
22:34
and I imagine it's not interesting to
22:36
a lot of you. So thank you
22:39
for understanding, thank you for tuning in
22:41
over the last 18 months. It's been
22:43
great and seriously I can't tell you
22:45
how excited I am for this next
22:47
chapter. Make sure you're subscribed on all
22:49
the platforms. If you want to get
22:51
an early peek at some of the
22:53
PDF content, make sure you're on my
22:56
newsletter. Go to Mark manson.net/newsletter. We're going
22:58
to be announcing and pushing everything all
23:00
over the place. So it's going to
23:02
be very exciting and the first episode
23:04
is going to be on values, which
23:06
I think is very appropriate considering I'm
23:08
the not give a fuck guy. So
23:11
we'll see you there. Drew and I
23:13
will be waiting and here's to a
23:15
new chapter. The subtle
23:17
art of Not Giving a Fuck podcast
23:19
is produced by Drew Bernie. It's edited
23:22
by Andrew Nishimura, Jessica Choise, our videographer,
23:24
and sound engineer. Thank you for listening,
23:26
and we will see you next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More