The Last Podcast

The Last Podcast

Released Wednesday, 9th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Last Podcast

The Last Podcast

The Last Podcast

The Last Podcast

Wednesday, 9th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Welcome back to the show everybody. Mark

0:02

Manson here and this is the last

0:04

podcast of the subtle art of not

0:06

giving a fuck podcast. Yes, the rumors

0:09

are true, the hints have been true,

0:11

all of the little breadcrumbs that I've

0:13

been dropping over the past few episodes

0:15

are in fact true. We are shutting

0:18

down this podcast, but we're shutting it

0:20

down because we're going to launch something

0:22

very new and exciting in its place

0:24

and I just want to take a

0:26

little bit of time to explain both

0:28

the reasoning why we're shutting this down

0:31

and then also what's coming next. So

0:33

bear with me for a little bit.

0:35

I'm going to take you behind the

0:37

scenes, kind of my personal thinking or

0:39

my personal experience with the podcast the

0:41

past year, what my reasoning has been,

0:43

and why we are making the changes

0:45

that we're going to make, and also

0:47

why I'm extremely excited. And I think

0:50

you guys are going to be absolutely thrilled

0:52

with what we produce instead of

0:54

the subtle not giving a fuck

0:56

podcast. So let's get right into

0:58

it. The first thing I want to say

1:00

is that it feels kind of

1:02

insane to shut down something

1:05

this successful. I was actually

1:07

looking at the numbers in

1:09

preparation for recording this. So

1:12

we had 75 episodes, over

1:14

30 million downloads, over 700,000

1:16

followers across platforms. That technically

1:18

puts us in the top

1:21

0.01% of podcasts, like the

1:23

top 400-ish podcast in the

1:25

world. is a massively successful

1:27

podcast by any objective

1:30

measurement, which is still a

1:32

little bit wild for me to think

1:34

about. And I also, I think

1:36

it's worth saying too that shutting

1:38

this down is not a good

1:40

business decision, at least in the

1:42

short term. There were multiple seven

1:44

figure offers on the table from

1:46

major podcast networks, major ad networks

1:48

that we turned down. and a

1:51

big reason for turning those down

1:53

is going to be clear in

1:55

a little bit, but I just

1:57

want to make it clearly like

1:59

this change. is really not for

2:01

the money. It's not like we're

2:03

not selling out in any way,

2:05

shape or form. In fact, it's

2:07

from a business point of view,

2:09

I might just be shooting myself

2:11

in the foot here. But I

2:13

think it's gonna be worth it.

2:15

I think everything that we're gonna

2:17

be producing and putting out is

2:19

absolutely gonna be worth it. And

2:21

five years from now, I'm gonna

2:23

look back and be like, this

2:25

is one of the best decisions.

2:27

So when I look at why.

2:29

I wanted to end the show,

2:31

there are two primary reasons. And

2:33

the first one is honestly just

2:35

purely selfish. And that is, I

2:37

wasn't really having a ton of

2:39

fun doing the show. And maybe

2:41

I was a parent to some

2:43

of you, maybe it wasn't, but

2:45

it became... impossible for me to

2:47

ignore past a certain point. I

2:49

mean, initially, say the first six

2:51

or eight months, like there was

2:53

kind of this honeymoon period, everything's

2:55

new, everything's exciting, but like really

2:57

once the show got going last

2:59

summer, it was painfully aware to

3:01

me that like, this is just

3:03

not really my thing. And we

3:05

tried to experiment with formats, you

3:07

know, we tried to introduce segments

3:10

to the show, Drew and I

3:12

tried to get a little bit.

3:14

playful and creative with some of

3:16

the topics that we'd address. We

3:18

started taking listener questions a lot

3:20

more. We tried to get a

3:22

little bit experimental with like guests

3:24

that we would bring on, but

3:26

it just never sat right. The

3:28

simple reason why is that I've

3:30

been in this industry for almost

3:32

20 years now, and my thing,

3:34

probably the reason that most of

3:36

you even give a shit that

3:38

I'm talking right now, is I

3:40

try to be independent-minded. I try

3:42

to say things that maybe need

3:44

to be said and nobody else

3:46

is really saying. I'm contrarian when

3:48

maybe it's not so popular to

3:50

be contrarian. I call bullshit when

3:52

I see it. And in the

3:54

classic podcast format of bringing on

3:56

kind of star intellectual guess and

3:58

thought leaders. I felt completely hamstrung

4:00

to be able to do that.

4:02

It is a format that is

4:04

antithetical in almost every shape and

4:06

form to ultimately what I think

4:08

I'm best at and what I

4:10

enjoy doing most in my line

4:12

of work. And that sucks. It

4:14

really sucks to have a notable

4:16

guest come on the show and

4:18

start saying something that I actually

4:20

kind of don't agree with or...

4:22

I'm like familiar with the research

4:24

they're talking about, but I don't

4:26

think the research is very good.

4:28

And it puts me in a

4:30

really tough spot of like, okay,

4:32

do I start challenging this guest

4:34

and potentially creating like a big

4:37

argument or a debate on the

4:39

show, potentially alienating the guests, themselves,

4:41

making sure that they're never going

4:43

to come back to the show?

4:45

Do I put myself in a

4:47

position where I'm like suddenly, like

4:49

I didn't prep for a debate

4:51

coming into this episode, but now

4:53

like suddenly I'm having to put

4:55

myself in a headspace of being

4:57

willing to argue and debate a

4:59

really smart person? It was just

5:01

not fun for me. It felt

5:03

like a no-win situation. I can

5:05

either start to fight and make

5:07

everybody miserable, make me miserable, make

5:09

the guest miserable, and make the

5:11

fans of the guest miserable. Or

5:13

I can sit there and smile

5:15

and not along and pretend like

5:17

everything's hunky-dory and also be miserable,

5:19

right? And I experimented with both

5:21

directions and nothing ever felt right.

5:23

And nothing ever felt right with

5:25

the audience either. And I should

5:27

add too that like the whole

5:29

process of sourcing, reaching out, booking,

5:31

guess, aftergast, aftergast, aftergast, it's kind

5:33

of this very unpleasant treadmill. First

5:35

of all, everybody in this space

5:37

is having the same guests on

5:39

over and over again. So you're

5:41

fighting with other podcasts to get

5:43

the same people on. And then

5:45

when you do get them on,

5:47

they kind of just say the

5:49

same thing they said on the

5:51

other podcast that they went on.

5:53

And if you try to get

5:55

them off the thing that they

5:57

said on the other podcast that

5:59

they went on, then they don't

6:02

really want to talk about some

6:04

other thing that you want to

6:06

talk about. And it like. I

6:08

understand that like really good podcasters

6:10

or that like that's the skill

6:12

set that they're experts at like

6:14

getting a new guest and getting

6:16

them to open up in a

6:18

new way and talk about something

6:20

that they've never talked about or

6:22

like researching really intensely and finding

6:24

that subject matter that like they've

6:26

never really been super public about.

6:28

I just found that like I

6:30

don't really care to get good

6:32

at that. That's not my thing.

6:34

And I don't think it's the

6:36

thing that I am best at.

6:38

I don't think it's the thing

6:40

I'm particularly talented at. It's definitely

6:42

not the thing I enjoy. And

6:44

I don't think it's the thing

6:46

that you guys are here for.

6:48

So what the fuck am I

6:50

doing? Trying to do that, like

6:52

trying to like get these super

6:54

spicy breaking guest interviews going. So

6:56

the whole guest thing was just

6:58

kind of, it's a little bit

7:00

of a non-starter for me. And

7:02

don't get me wrong, like some

7:04

of the guests who came on

7:06

the show, I had a fucking

7:08

blast with and had great conversations

7:10

with and had great conversations with

7:12

and had great conversations with, with,

7:14

with, with, with, you know there

7:16

are a lot of guests that

7:18

came on that I was just

7:20

kind of like going through the

7:22

motions and it's one of those

7:24

situations where I have to take

7:26

my own advice and you know

7:29

I'm constantly telling my audience that

7:31

the more you care about something

7:33

the better you'll be at it

7:35

and the more impactful it will

7:37

be to other people and here

7:39

I am just going through the

7:41

motions working on something that I

7:43

don't deeply care about I don't

7:45

think I'm super great at and

7:47

not only am I paying the

7:49

price as well. So starting a

7:51

few months ago it became abundantly

7:53

clear that some sort of pivot

7:55

needed to be made and Drew

7:57

and I started talking very seriously

7:59

about what if we just reboot

8:01

the whole show entirely and start

8:03

from first principles. Before I get

8:05

into that though I do I

8:07

want to go on a little

8:09

bit of a rant here. Because

8:11

having been in the self-help personal

8:13

development podcast world now for a

8:15

couple of years, I'm like a

8:17

little alarmed by what kind of

8:19

flies in this space, not to

8:21

say that like, you know, the

8:23

shows are bad or the advice

8:25

that's being given is bad. It's

8:27

just, I don't think the incentives

8:29

are very healthy at the moment.

8:31

So... In the creator or influencer

8:33

world, there's a concept that's relatively

8:35

well known in my industry, known

8:37

as audience capture. And chances are

8:39

you guys have seen this among

8:41

people that you followed over the

8:43

years. Like, often somebody will build

8:45

an audience among a certain demographic

8:47

or a certain group of people

8:49

who have like some crazy belief,

8:51

right? The creator or the podcaster

8:53

or the YouTubeer like they realize

8:56

that if they if they just

8:58

keep hitting that crazy topic over

9:00

and over again tens of

9:02

thousands hundreds of thousands of people

9:04

keep showing up in force and

9:06

engaging with them over and over

9:08

again. And so what you see

9:10

is that the influencer actually starts

9:12

to take on those crazy beliefs

9:14

and that personality of this like

9:16

segment of their audience that they've

9:18

suddenly captured. And so it's like

9:20

it's almost like being brainwashed by

9:22

your audience. Like you're rewarded for

9:24

feeding into their kind of crazy

9:26

beliefs or narratives. And so the

9:28

the the podcaster or the Youtuber

9:30

kind of convinces themselves that they

9:32

believe those things. Don't feel any

9:34

cognitive dissonance when they when they

9:36

keep putting out the content that

9:38

that audience wants and Audience capture

9:40

is a very real thing I've

9:42

seen it happen in my industry

9:44

many many times It's something I'm

9:46

very careful about and aware of

9:48

with myself that I like really

9:50

try to check myself and make

9:52

sure it's not happening to me

9:54

But I think there's something specific

9:56

to the podcasting world that is

9:58

similar to audience capture, but it's

10:00

a little bit different and I

10:02

would call that guest capture Which

10:04

is, you end up with these

10:06

incentives like, okay, fuck it. I'll

10:08

just, I'll use a real person

10:10

as an example. because there's no

10:12

way in fucking hell I would

10:14

ever have this person on the

10:16

show. Take Joe to Spencer, for

10:18

example, right? Joe to Spencer, he's

10:20

like kind of the new big

10:22

self-help guru, he's doing these massive

10:24

seminars and like arenas and stuff.

10:26

And when you look at his

10:28

content, it's really, it's kind of

10:30

just the secret 2.0. Like it's,

10:32

you know, meditate, breathwork, manifestation, believe

10:35

in yourself, you can be and

10:37

do anything. It's a bunch of

10:39

bullshit. Like we've been here before

10:41

before, right. If you have him

10:43

on your show, it's like a

10:45

guaranteed four to five million person

10:47

audience. Like his audience is massive

10:49

and it is absolutely rabid. They

10:51

consume every single thing he touches.

10:53

And so I have quietly watched

10:55

as multiple people in my space

10:57

continually bring them on their shows

10:59

and let him spout his quantum

11:01

theory bullshit over and over again.

11:03

And I'm not like singling out

11:05

Joe dispensers like... He's not uniquely

11:07

bad in any way. He's just

11:09

an example, right? Because it's like

11:11

I understand what those podcasters are

11:13

going through. Like I know for

11:15

a fact that some of those

11:17

podcasters don't believe any of the

11:19

stuff that he says, but they

11:21

still bring him on the show

11:23

and they placate him and they

11:25

humor him and they let him

11:27

like go on his spiel about

11:29

manifesting and quantum spirits and whatever.

11:31

And then they let the, you

11:33

know, the four million views or

11:35

the five million downloads come in.

11:37

And then they, you know, they

11:39

move on to the next guest.

11:41

And to me, that just feels

11:43

like a certain level of prostituting

11:45

oneself. And it's like, I find

11:47

it very distasteful, but I understand

11:49

the impulse to do that. Like,

11:51

as a podcaster myself, I want

11:53

to bring on guests that are

11:55

going to bring in massive audiences.

11:57

And so to bring on somebody

11:59

with a huge audience, I want

12:01

to at least placate or goal.

12:03

with whatever they say and act

12:05

as though I agree with it

12:07

or at least don't disagree with

12:09

it because then that will convert

12:11

their audience into my audience. I

12:13

felt myself being pulled in this

12:15

direction while having notable people on

12:17

the show and it just it

12:19

made me feel very gross and

12:21

it felt it went against everything

12:23

that I think I stand for

12:25

in this in this industry and

12:27

in this market and I don't

12:29

want to get sucked down that

12:31

and so The first thing I

12:33

will say about the new show

12:36

that we're going to launch is

12:38

that there will be no guests

12:40

on it. That doesn't mean that

12:42

we're not going to talk to

12:44

experts, we're actually going to talk

12:46

to a lot of experts, but

12:48

we're going to talk to them

12:50

behind the scenes. We're going to

12:52

talk to them behind the scenes.

12:54

We're going to talk to experts

12:56

who don't have audiences. We're going

12:58

to talk to academics. We're going

13:00

to talk to experts. people's ideas

13:02

and perspectives, and be able to

13:04

criticize them openly and show the

13:06

pros and cons of certain viewpoints

13:08

and not feel socially pressured or

13:10

audience pressured into going along with

13:12

certain things that maybe I don't

13:14

believe in or that frankly the

13:16

research doesn't back up. Okay, second

13:18

gripe, and again this is something

13:20

that I think is a wider

13:22

problem in the personal development podcast

13:24

space, but I've also experienced that

13:26

on our show as well, is

13:28

that you can have one guest

13:30

on one week and they'll tell

13:32

you X, Y, Z, and then

13:34

you have another guest on two

13:36

weeks later and they say the

13:38

exact opposite of X, Y, Z.

13:40

And again, I feel put in

13:42

a bind whenever that happens. I

13:44

struggle, like, how should I contextualize

13:46

this? Well, shit, like, is this

13:48

guy line or was the guy

13:50

two weeks ago line? Like, should

13:52

I bring this up? I think

13:54

it's it's beautiful to have podcast.

13:56

with a wide variety of perspectives

13:58

and views, but I do think

14:00

there needs to be some cohesion

14:02

or clarity around like, you know,

14:04

what's legitimate, what's not. Like, certain

14:06

viewpoints have more evidence behind them

14:08

than others. But when you present

14:10

everything as just another guest saying

14:12

another thing, like that gets lost

14:14

in the mix. And again, I.

14:16

I think the context is so

14:18

important and the context is not

14:20

being featured. It's like being left

14:22

behind the scenes. So when Drew

14:24

and I sat down and we

14:26

were like, really just, what do

14:28

we want to build from first

14:30

principles? And not only what do

14:32

we want to build, but also

14:34

like, what do we feel like

14:36

this space needs? What is it

14:39

lacking? What is the show that

14:41

needs to exist, but nobody's making

14:43

at the moment? And the conclusion

14:45

that we came to is that

14:47

the space needs. a very serious

14:49

deep dive into individual topics. And

14:51

when I say serious deep dive,

14:53

I mean like extremely thorough vetting

14:55

multiple perspectives, vetting research from multiple

14:57

places, walking through the history and

14:59

context and. train of thought that

15:01

occurred from one generation to the

15:03

next of thinkers and researchers, like

15:05

really giving a fully fleshed out

15:07

view of a single subject, instead

15:09

of just, you know, bringing on,

15:11

you know, Joe Blow academic or,

15:13

you know, Jane Smith influencer and

15:15

asking them the same questions. So

15:17

we really want to do like

15:19

a full, thorough, comprehensive guide. to

15:21

a single subject matter and just

15:23

simply include all of the varying

15:25

perspectives of experts within that single

15:27

episode. And so that's what we're

15:29

gonna do. They're gonna be longer

15:31

episodes and they're gonna be posted

15:33

less frequently. And the idea is

15:35

that every time you listen to

15:37

an episode, whatever the topic is.

15:39

whether it's procrastination or managing your

15:41

emotions or discovering your values, the

15:43

idea, Drew and I's North Star

15:45

as we're putting this together with

15:47

our team, is that this should

15:49

be the last podcast episode that

15:51

you ever have to listen to

15:53

on this subject, that if you

15:55

get through this episode of this

15:57

podcast on this subject, every other

15:59

podcast that comes up on that

16:01

subject is gonna feel repetitive and

16:03

like a waste of time. Because

16:05

you've already done it. You've already

16:07

been through the entire mix. You've

16:09

gotten all the information. You have

16:11

all the takeaways and you know

16:13

exactly how to implement it into

16:15

your life. That is our goal.

16:17

And that promise of being the

16:19

last podcast you ever need, we're

16:21

keeping that promise with ourselves. Our

16:23

goal with every episode that we

16:25

make is that we can never

16:27

come back to this topic. or

16:29

at least until there's like some

16:31

new breakthrough discovery or research, we're

16:33

never coming back to this topic.

16:35

This needs to be completely soup

16:37

the nuts, A to Z, cover

16:40

every single base. So like, let's

16:42

get it right. The other thing

16:44

about this show is that it's

16:46

gonna be ad-free. This is another

16:48

incentive issue, I think, in this

16:50

space, is that as somebody who

16:52

is doling out life advice, there's

16:54

a lot of incentives that come

16:56

from sponsorships and a lot of

16:58

companies to want to push certain

17:00

products or relationships and I mean

17:02

some of them I feel confident

17:04

with I mean a lot of

17:06

the sponsors on this show are

17:08

products that I've used or I

17:10

actively do use but there's a

17:12

lot of situations where a company

17:14

shows up with a lot of

17:16

money and they want you to

17:18

say and do some things and

17:20

again I just don't want to

17:22

deal with that. On top of

17:24

that every single episode is going

17:26

to come with a full PDF

17:28

summary and guide. all of the

17:30

sources citations and notes it's going

17:32

to be a full summary of

17:34

the episode it's going to include

17:36

everything that Drew and I talk

17:38

about it's going to have all

17:40

of the book recommendations and the

17:42

experts that we talk to. Some

17:44

of these PDFs, we're working on

17:46

the third episode now. Some of

17:48

these PDFs are like pushing 80,

17:50

90 pages. They are absolutely massive.

17:52

I mean, honestly, it's crazy. I

17:54

honestly believe some of these episodes

17:56

are more valuable than entire books

17:58

written on these subjects, and we're

18:00

just gonna give it out for

18:02

free. It's just gonna be available

18:04

to all you guys each month

18:06

as it comes out. So the

18:08

new show, it's gonna be called

18:10

Sol. Because the idea is that

18:12

if you listen to the episode

18:14

and you pay attention and you

18:16

actually fucking do the thing in

18:18

the episode, you do the takeaways,

18:20

you implement it into your life,

18:22

that area of your life should

18:24

be solved. It should no longer

18:26

be an open question. You should

18:28

no longer feel a need to

18:30

go read another book or go

18:32

hire another coach. If there's one

18:34

thing that I've learned over the

18:36

past year with a bunch of

18:38

the live events that I've done,

18:40

like meeting a lot of you

18:43

guys in person, doing a lot

18:45

of speaking, it seems like The

18:47

number one issue everyone has at

18:49

the moment is that there's information

18:51

overload, but there's no implementation. There's

18:53

no clear roadmap of like, okay,

18:55

well, cool, I just like listen

18:57

this three hour conversation with this

18:59

doctor, but like, I don't know

19:01

what to actually go do. And

19:03

so the goal of this new

19:05

podcast is not only to give

19:07

you. all of the necessary information,

19:09

but it's to give you also

19:11

the implementation along the way, to

19:13

make it clear of like, okay,

19:15

these are actually like just the

19:17

four questions you should be focusing

19:19

on, and these are the three

19:21

things that you should do first,

19:23

and if you do this, this,

19:25

and this, then you're probably good.

19:27

The Salt Podcast will be launching

19:29

on May 1st. If you're subscribed

19:31

to this podcast feed on Apple

19:33

or Spotify or any other audio

19:35

platform, you will automatically be subscribed

19:37

to the Solve Feed. the subtle

19:39

art feed over to Solved. If

19:41

you're subscribed on YouTube and watching

19:43

this on YouTube, we are going

19:45

to move the Solved podcast back

19:47

to the main Mark Manson channel.

19:49

So if you're not subscribed to

19:51

the Mark Manson channel, you should

19:53

go there, get subscribed, because that's

19:55

where the first Solved episode is

19:57

going to be dropped on May

19:59

1st. We're also getting away from

20:01

like, you know, every other Tuesday or

20:03

Monday morning, release schedules. We're just

20:06

dropping episodes on the first of

20:08

every single month. So the first

20:10

episode will be May 1st, the

20:12

second episode will be June 1st,

20:14

the third episode will be July

20:16

1st. The idea is that these

20:18

are long-term, slow-burn commitments that you

20:20

guys make. You can work through

20:22

an episode at your leisure. The

20:24

episodes are pretty long. I'm gonna

20:26

warn you, like we're looking... three,

20:29

four, five hours long, but you

20:31

can take your time with it.

20:33

You can listen to it slowly

20:35

over multiple days or multiple weeks.

20:37

You can work your way through

20:40

the PDF guide. Everything's gonna come

20:42

with accompanying exercises and implementations. So

20:44

you can like really just let it

20:46

savor in your brain a little bit.

20:48

Just like let it based like

20:50

a turkey on Thanksgiving. And finally,

20:52

I do have to say like

20:55

this. experiment this phase of my

20:57

career this podcast has it really

20:59

it's been wonderful it's something that

21:01

that I I probably should have

21:04

done like five years ago and

21:06

and honestly if I did start

21:08

this podcast five or six years

21:10

ago maybe Maybe things would be

21:12

different. Maybe I would stick with this

21:14

format. Maybe we would be doing maybe

21:17

we would be doing the same fucking

21:19

guest treadmill that everybody else is doing.

21:21

I don't know. All I know is

21:23

that like this has been a really

21:25

rewarding project over the last year and

21:27

a half. It's it's built a wonderful

21:30

audience that is so much more engaged

21:32

than a lot of other places that

21:34

I post or a lot of other

21:36

content that I put online. It has

21:38

introduced me to a lot of amazing

21:41

people, like a lot of the guests that

21:43

I have had on are just like awesome

21:45

people that I'm so grateful that I am

21:47

able to know and be in touch with.

21:49

So it has given me a lot and

21:51

I am very thankful for it. I

21:54

just also think it's not the right

21:56

thing for me. I don't like this, it's

21:58

not a right fit for me. it's what

22:00

you guys want from me either. And

22:02

so, solved is my attempt to A,

22:04

get right with what I want to

22:07

make. Like this is what I would

22:09

want to listen to in this market

22:11

that nobody's making. So, fuck it. Like,

22:13

let me go make it. And I

22:15

also think it's what you guys want

22:17

to hear too. I think it's what

22:19

you guys are going to be more

22:21

interested in. You know, I don't think

22:24

you guys need another like, you know,

22:26

fucking morning routine and... to listen to

22:28

the same dude who's been on 18

22:30

other podcasts to promote his book. Like

22:32

that's just, it's not interesting to me

22:34

and I imagine it's not interesting to

22:36

a lot of you. So thank you

22:39

for understanding, thank you for tuning in

22:41

over the last 18 months. It's been

22:43

great and seriously I can't tell you

22:45

how excited I am for this next

22:47

chapter. Make sure you're subscribed on all

22:49

the platforms. If you want to get

22:51

an early peek at some of the

22:53

PDF content, make sure you're on my

22:56

newsletter. Go to Mark manson.net/newsletter. We're going

22:58

to be announcing and pushing everything all

23:00

over the place. So it's going to

23:02

be very exciting and the first episode

23:04

is going to be on values, which

23:06

I think is very appropriate considering I'm

23:08

the not give a fuck guy. So

23:11

we'll see you there. Drew and I

23:13

will be waiting and here's to a

23:15

new chapter. The subtle

23:17

art of Not Giving a Fuck podcast

23:19

is produced by Drew Bernie. It's edited

23:22

by Andrew Nishimura, Jessica Choise, our videographer,

23:24

and sound engineer. Thank you for listening,

23:26

and we will see you next week.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features