Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
Hello and welcome to another
0:04
bonus episode of the Supermassive podcast
0:06
from the Royal Astronomical Society with
0:09
me, science journalist Izzy Clark, astrophysicist
0:11
Dr. Becky Smithers and the society's
0:13
deputy director, Dr. Robert Massey. This
0:16
is the place where we dive
0:18
into the Supermassive mailbox and answer
0:20
all of your brilliant, brilliant questions
0:22
that make us scratch
0:25
your head and be like, do you even know anything? I'm
0:29
just like, okay. But
0:31
before we do that, we've had some really nice
0:33
messages and emails that I would like to
0:35
run through. Bookitavir on Instagram loved that we
0:38
did an episode on Voyager and she said,
0:40
my dad sold a sensor to NASA that's
0:42
on board. I don't have any questions, but
0:45
I got to do the coolest show and
0:47
tell in school. That's amazing. Isn't it? So
0:49
I went back and said to her, I
0:51
was like, oh my God, what did this
0:54
sensor do? I need to know. More details,
0:56
please. More details, please. So she said, it
0:58
was about temperature using a heated wire. There
1:00
are the main products back then measured
1:03
fluid flow and particulates. Dad
1:05
trained us setting up experiments
1:07
at home using his company's
1:09
equipment, how to design an
1:11
experiment, controls, parameters, et cetera,
1:13
from a very young age.
1:16
Then we'd get to go with him on
1:18
business trips. Boeing could hardly say that the
1:20
equipment was too complex if a six-year-old girl
1:22
in the 1960s could
1:24
demonstrate it and recommend on the fly
1:27
an experiment after seeing their top secret
1:29
military jet wing for the first time.
1:33
Great sales pitch and we really enjoyed
1:35
it. I got to meet the professor
1:37
who invented the tornado F-scale and demonstrate
1:39
a sensor on a mini tornado he
1:41
spun up in his lab. I
1:43
know, how cool is this? Dad was great way
1:45
ahead of his time in treating girls equally and
1:47
then taking them to work ages before that was
1:50
a thing. I mean, what a
1:52
guy. That's so cool. Yeah. So,
1:54
so cool. And nice to know that that little piece of
1:57
him sort of lives on in Voyager as well, just
1:59
leaving the solar system. I know
2:01
it's amazing and we.
2:03
Just happen to be recording this by necessitate.
2:05
A very important time because at
2:07
the twins according if it's last
2:10
week and. There was a big
2:12
old bright flash see sky. a circus.
2:14
It did anyone see the Aurora Borealis?
2:16
Yes Over Oxford I was just black
2:19
ops. A gobsmacked elected never believed in
2:21
my life. I'd see why. Did like
2:23
when we live in talk and old
2:25
has been a soloist overdrawn. Go outside
2:28
and look know I expected. like. A
2:30
little fuzzy green glow on the horizon you
2:32
know and so point out people who do
2:35
it Really? is it that way it was
2:37
like insane was know it was like right
2:39
above like my head so shitty big streaks
2:41
of green and purple and pink that like
2:43
a one point I could even see the
2:45
past or colors with with my either know
2:47
what i see like phones boy out better
2:49
the color but like ah. Just.
2:52
Incredible. I was up with the my
2:54
local restaurants such loose and we've gathered at his
2:56
side. The old racecourse above the town of it
2:58
happens to be some studies me any with telescopes
3:00
to get laid back on would. I'm.
3:02
Obviously we just got lucky. We news coming on
3:04
the alerts and we thought will it happen not
3:06
a significant game is a was Mc Get to
3:08
the look and see anything. Strawberries
3:11
started his golden globe and expanded over the
3:14
whole sky. In it was really remarkable for
3:16
me to actually see colors with the eyes
3:18
will see greens and reds and blues, yellows,
3:21
So easily. The best display I've
3:23
ever seen. Only the second time in my life have
3:25
seen it all. And really. Unprecedented said
3:27
resist object model. Get see more than one or
3:29
two more these in my life in the Uk
3:31
at least a. So. Get thirty! Recommend
3:34
if you get alerts if you know something's
3:36
coming. Just. On the off chance,
3:38
don't take a look. Guys. I have
3:40
a compressor. I didn't
3:42
see it. Ah Amy know
3:44
I'd I am indeed you try and see
3:46
a Saturday night I admit and many that
3:48
level of the matter Yes And I had
3:50
no. I cannot tell you how. Heartbreak and
3:53
I'm like I'm not okay about this
3:55
so is. there are times when so
3:57
case of phone you have passed by.
3:59
yeah. Oh my god yeah it's
4:01
not even with me. my side was
4:03
going mad I was a semi was
4:05
basically i love my friends is probably
4:08
listen to this or that her head
4:10
day I'm on I was. Occasionally.
4:12
Just leaving it to go to stand
4:14
in the street to be like now
4:16
Now Now and Isis either. They just
4:18
couldn't see. It and. Ago
4:21
Maybe you. Are a bit too well
4:24
with breast on your hand is no
4:26
to sit around and I thought I
4:28
wasn't that bad and wasn't that bad
4:30
and. Either. though of it's just
4:33
really got his to be on sit. At
4:35
their really bad now fully no no
4:37
no line I'm celebrating everyone's and I'm
4:40
just like leaning into the we going
4:42
into Sailor Maximum that will the I
4:44
have other opportunities yeah my Billie be
4:47
another solar storm Vienna? Yes. Exempt. You
4:49
know, I know the broads. Rory in Lives
4:51
and Eighty Nine and Two Thousand and Three.
4:53
I think in the first case because I
4:55
was just in the pub, you know said
4:57
no system. Innocent Thousand and three. I just
4:59
didn't hear about it till afterwards. So. Well
5:01
it cool though. It's like because I just
5:03
saw the Aurora last year in Iceland by
5:06
the first time more with cool with comparing
5:08
like what again as like Hayes is when
5:10
we were nice and like it was. It
5:12
was directly overhead like a rabid but you
5:14
could see it. You could see that it
5:16
was bright green like with your eyes and
5:18
also you could see it move like in
5:20
real time as well. You could fully see
5:23
it rippling like just staring at it and
5:25
looking at it. And and it was cool.
5:27
like comparing it to how you couldn't see
5:29
the colors but you could see the same.
5:31
Sort of funds here but it was still
5:33
by oh the heads and if you look
5:35
for long enough you could tell that is
5:37
changed from like when you are looking at
5:40
it like a minute earlier but you couldn't
5:42
necessary see it like ripple that quickly and
5:44
move said called combat. I did see the
5:46
top yeah was impressive. I thought the colors
5:48
you know rudy obvious which I was. There
5:50
was only five minutes or so. I can see the colors
5:52
is my eye and it was a pastel. Rather like
5:54
neon green Know. Yeah.
5:57
so i'm gonna die as a tiny
5:59
little I'm just so worried. I'm going to
6:01
start like my own solidarity club with any other
6:03
listeners that might have missed it and we're just
6:05
going to go and do our own thing and
6:08
it's fine. It's fine. I
6:10
tell myself it's fine. It's a
6:12
port group. Hi Izzy. I'm
6:15
in my studio more in 2000 people. Basically.
6:19
Basically. Okay. Right. Let's go and do
6:22
some actual questions. So Robert, can you
6:24
help with this question from Alex in
6:26
Bristol? Absolutely love the
6:28
pod. I was lucky enough to catch a
6:30
glimpse of the northern lights the other evening
6:33
despite being all the way down in sunny
6:35
Bristol. An absolute beautiful sight
6:37
and if it wasn't for my neck
6:39
ache I would have stayed out all
6:41
night. My two questions
6:43
to you are firstly what causes
6:45
the aurora borealis and secondly why
6:47
did my phone camera pick up
6:49
so much more of its colour
6:51
than the naked eye could. Thanks
6:53
so much Alex. Actually a
6:55
brilliant question there Alex and well done for
6:57
you seeing it in Bristol. My old friends
6:59
in Bristol are on a great view as
7:01
well and do approach them if you want
7:03
to share pictures or find out other ways
7:05
to look at the sky. But to answer
7:07
your questions it's often said not least by
7:09
many media outlets that the lights are a
7:11
result of pastels and the sun directly crashing
7:14
into the atmosphere. And that's a
7:16
misconception I had for a long time as
7:18
well. It's not quite true. There's
7:20
a really good article in the conversation if you look
7:22
online from Alex McKinnon from the University of Glasgow who
7:24
wrote an explanation of this a couple of years ago.
7:28
It is true that the originating source
7:30
is a coronal mass ejection, a big
7:32
eruption of material from the sun or
7:34
a CME as we call them. And these eject
7:36
a lot of charged particles from the sun into
7:38
space. Moving charged particles have
7:40
magnet-generate magnetic fields. If they reach the
7:43
earth they then off it our own
7:45
magnetic field, the magnetosphere of the earth.
7:48
That Can cause a breakdown, twist around
7:50
the line, sort of cause a bit of
7:52
chaos in the field. And When it all
7:54
connects together again, it releases a lot of
7:56
energy and you get electrical currents and those
7:58
accelerate electrons. Pushed into the
8:00
upper atmosphere and those particles they collide with
8:03
oxygen and nitrogen atoms and that's what B
8:05
C to Beautiful display they pick site dig
8:07
site the atoms and they as a D
8:09
cide the photons that come out of the
8:11
give us these wonderful. Now
8:14
the second bid real question I should say
8:16
guy a few small proportion of those particles
8:18
does come from the some of the most
8:20
of his excited locally. But. The
8:22
second question about the color and why your
8:24
smartphone the so much better is the at
8:26
night our eyes are using. The Socal rub
8:28
sample was never a good for night vision
8:30
is routed. Really? Dot. So.
8:33
Good for detecting low light, but Iranian
8:35
black and white such see color. We
8:37
need more light. And. We needed to
8:39
be bright enough to trigger these kinds cells in
8:42
Central. The I'd. Some. Nice thing to
8:44
rory wouldn't like a blight is flow but
8:46
newsweek We were lucky enough to see colors
8:48
with our i'm pretty dramatically him and I've
8:50
never seen anything like and I think one
8:53
or or displayed before. This is astonishing. And
8:56
or even brighter on a smartphone. Biggest muffins, you
8:58
just much more sensitive that they're geared up to
9:00
detect color in low light of on the the
9:02
chips they've got and in a single exposure they're
9:05
also gathering that like for lot longer typically anyway
9:07
than your eyes do. So that's why your smartphone
9:09
with the colors that much more insular. Betty
9:12
Keys ran says hi this is
9:14
me kids ran a young listener
9:16
of your amazing pockets to which
9:18
I owe my longtime fascination with
9:20
space science field by the incredible
9:22
enthusiasm that Doctor Becky sites for
9:24
astrophysics on how you Tube channel
9:26
know thing of Kiss and having
9:28
a growing interest in the peculiar
9:31
giant of our solar system I'm
9:33
writing to you to ask about.
9:35
Seeped is great blue spot. What
9:37
exactly is it? How does it
9:39
form? How is it detected and
9:41
doesn't. Have any connection to it's more
9:43
well known. Read counterpart.
9:46
I will. Let's start there is around kids
9:48
site the great Red spot is like an
9:50
A real actual spot right that we can
9:53
see with our eyes. It's a real storm
9:55
on Jupiter right? so you could. You can
9:57
really call it a spotlight this one. the
9:59
great. Incidentally, not
10:01
blue and I don't know if you could
10:04
spot for it's okay. so this is actually
10:06
a feature in Jupiter's magnetic fields. To me,
10:08
look at the minus it feels rent the
10:10
cross Jupiter and we plot that out. We
10:13
like drawing on a diagram in terms of
10:15
like the face of Jupiter. You
10:18
end up seeing like a really strong concentration
10:20
near the equator and because of how we
10:22
plot things to that like the human I
10:24
can interpret data like scientific data. We use
10:26
color to do that right. And so the
10:28
color scheme that the authors of of and
10:30
with this paper pick to our this is
10:32
first published like picked is that. It.
10:34
Was blue Fri in this blue spot on the
10:36
equator and that was what was like showing this
10:38
struggling messy field and so they dubbed it the
10:41
Great Billie Spot to so have you know how
10:43
to play on like the big Red spot and
10:45
Gibson. Said. Not really blue
10:47
at it's not really spot is
10:49
this is really strong blob of
10:51
my messy field as fit our
10:53
formed. Is
10:56
any either. Because he
10:58
went nowhere get on. It really is
11:00
really not clear like what drives it
11:02
at all species. I think we talked
11:04
about it and the puck as before
11:06
right the ladies magnetic fields upon it said
11:09
a generated by said he had charged
11:11
particles in the in the core of
11:13
as the planet in vain liquid metal
11:15
knees and around is very. Chaotic Am and
11:17
so we're not really sure why this is
11:19
like big Blob. this is so much stronger
11:21
like we don't know why that like it's
11:24
it's kind of an anomaly. really like why
11:26
it's even there in the first place to
11:28
has been a lot of interest in it
11:30
now and how wasted again how it's been
11:33
detected in the first they says well with
11:35
street you know the probe that's currently in
11:37
orbit around Jupiter is the do not says
11:40
like targeted fly bys So I like closer
11:42
and closer to the surface of Jupiter to
11:44
got into an on board that can detect.
11:46
The strength of been as the magnetic field
11:48
and it's thought to be that is perhaps
11:51
just. Sort. Of like wave
11:53
like behavior really deep inside the core
11:55
of Jupiter that could be leading to
11:57
the sort of like a normal. The
12:00
north to the fact that it it's kind
12:02
of moving as well all the time again
12:04
just something else. We can't explain the how
12:06
this great blue spot but you know maybe
12:09
if we didn't he paper that comes out
12:11
about it is we should definitely cover again
12:13
on a on a feature Puck as upset.
12:16
Yeah, deathly and as kids, right? As a
12:18
young listener, hey, maybe they might go into
12:20
actually discuss all. Yeah, a little bit of
12:22
our backers, so no pressure, but that. Stay
12:24
here and I think this a gross.
12:26
They did say they had a growing
12:28
interest a day as I mean you
12:30
never know when I grow to the
12:32
interest of okay and Robert Sarver Torres
12:34
it might be saboteurs I'm has sent
12:36
us an email. She. Says
12:38
hi all see massive put courses. I
12:41
love the poor costs and I've been
12:43
to Listen. So one of the episodes
12:45
society is It and I have a
12:47
question probably silly if the sun loses
12:50
it's mass by giving hour energy will
12:52
that affect the gravity and orbit of
12:54
the sun itself and the planets in
12:56
the distant future? For example, when it
12:59
runs out of fuel and sought swelling
13:01
as a large planets except more gravitational
13:03
influence on the sun and the sun
13:06
accept less gravitational pull on the planet.
13:08
Or will it be negligible? Thanks so
13:10
and keep. Up the good work Well
13:12
Hi Sarah A. Keep listening and when
13:14
you say city question for us, we
13:17
tend to psych great question Which means
13:19
we're we're thinking very, very odd about
13:21
the onset of said. It definitely isn't
13:23
a silly question. sold. On.
13:25
The roof and the as the sun
13:28
season rations to the hydrogen or helium
13:30
as a mass loss of about four
13:32
point three million tons of the second
13:35
massive energy. It's of equivalent of Einstein's
13:37
theories. The not masses transfer
13:39
to map electromagnetic radiation said lights
13:41
and he took such with it
13:43
ultimately warns the. And
13:45
you're right that that muscles does indeed would use
13:47
the pool of gravity between the some the planet's
13:50
including yours that it means that the earth is
13:52
moving away from the some By that a centimeter
13:54
obvious are not very much really very hard to
13:56
detect to change the small the dose of of
13:58
the then have a very much. Effect on
14:00
the sun to and it's marginal because the
14:02
sun's got about a million times much masses.
14:05
Our planet and even Jupiter is only a
14:07
thousand. The mass of the Sons of Effect
14:09
is pretty small there as well, for on
14:11
very long time scales billions of years. It's
14:13
also to add up to something. And.
14:15
It might help. same Mars escape being
14:17
consumed by the Some when the some
14:19
becomes red giant. Thought: That said, there
14:22
are other effects to that the billions
14:24
of years like the long term stability
14:26
of all the planetary orbits not certain
14:28
that will be either a whole time
14:30
scale solar system, a gravitational radiation being
14:32
emitted from plans for the orbit, the
14:34
something to lose a bit of energy
14:36
inspired in a tiny amount as well
14:38
and even in not in the sense
14:40
that we understand illness but even source
14:42
of friction as planets hit particles and
14:45
other things. That minuscule the is very
14:47
important the early solar system because of their
14:49
conditions and more material around and it could
14:51
be really important to earth at the At
14:53
does end up on the edge of the
14:55
red. John Sullivan could get the of the.
14:58
Danny. A baked rock by that point of
15:00
nowhere to live. But it could then mean
15:02
that the is more likely to be consumed
15:04
by that red giant son and billions of
15:06
years in the future. However, we have at
15:09
least hundreds of millions of years of ugly
15:11
anyway. clement life on earth that before any
15:13
of this happened, side. Of
15:15
mana about this. One I think. I have.
15:17
Oh good. okay I. Have
15:21
I'm Becky William Morgan says hello
15:23
from the U S. I've been
15:25
having a great time, listen to
15:27
your pocket and learning a ton
15:29
from each episode, but I've been
15:31
hearing something come up pretty often
15:33
the I'm not quite sure I
15:35
fully understand. Many times I'll hear
15:37
something about how some kind of
15:39
sample rock comment planet or other
15:41
objects in the universe is x
15:43
number of years old, but how
15:46
exactly is that? Age Determined if
15:48
everything was created at the same
15:50
time from the big fan. Is
15:52
it difficult for scientists to determine
15:54
specific ages apart from you know,
15:56
the beginning of the universe? Yeah,
15:58
that is another great. In
16:00
William so like yes in the
16:02
very early days of the universe
16:04
when the being this is a
16:06
very young and everything was just
16:09
as like hot plasma of particles
16:11
can you still have like electrons
16:13
and protons completely separate from each
16:15
other? The first items and elements
16:17
to form was solely like hydrogen,
16:19
helium and like the tiniest amount
16:21
of lithium. So when we age
16:23
things it's not like were aging
16:26
things all the way back to
16:28
those. Original sort of. I asked him
16:30
that forms that. He way billion years
16:32
ago like what were aging. It's
16:34
almost like when stuff came together
16:36
to to be what it actually
16:38
is So it took me like
16:40
many generations of start then create
16:42
all the other elements that we
16:44
find in nature today like in
16:46
the big for nuclear forges that
16:48
start ah didn't produce things like
16:51
carbon, oxygen, nitrogen that make up
16:53
like losing that you listed red
16:55
rocks and comments and planet that.
16:57
So the way we then date
16:59
rocks in the material that. Makes
17:01
rocks up whether that's.
17:04
Iraq the final s a terrestrial
17:06
rocks or rocks. Outside of
17:08
An Extraterrestrial rocks race. You.
17:11
Know it like have meet. You I saw nino lumps
17:13
rock from the moon or Mars or anything
17:15
else. Is a
17:17
Gandhi very young, complex chemistry or been
17:19
affected by radiation neck is really difficult
17:22
to get updates on their age, but
17:24
the approach that we tend to use
17:26
the set of the oldest rocks that
17:28
you can do this with his radioactive
17:30
dating you might have had about before
17:33
rights. Essentially what you're doing here is
17:35
measuring the amount of like an original
17:37
radioactive substance what we call an isotope
17:39
to the get a specific flavor of
17:41
a particular asked to. That means that
17:44
the nucleus has a set number of
17:46
as. neutrons essentially and so for example
17:48
you can use like uranium to sweet
17:50
eight and not to cave in to
17:52
lead to have sex with two different
17:55
types or isotopes of an element a
17:57
do that with what's known as a
17:59
half life of 4.5
18:01
billion years. So that means that essentially in
18:03
four and a half billion years you'll have
18:05
half the amount of uranium that you did
18:07
in the beginning. And so for example
18:09
you can also use an even longer decay right? Rubidium
18:12
87 goes to strontium 87
18:14
with a half-life of 49 billion
18:17
years right? That was typically used by meteorocysts right?
18:19
So I guess that makes it sound very simple
18:21
right? All you have to do is just
18:23
measure the ratio of how much of this thing
18:25
do you have and how much of this thing
18:28
do you have but it can get
18:30
quite complicated right? Because to do that you need
18:32
what's known as a mass spectrometer essentially like this
18:34
device that where you can put a sample in
18:36
and then it will split out
18:39
all that sample apart into its separate atomic nuclei
18:41
right? It does it using like magnetic fields and
18:43
stuff and then you can get a really accurate
18:45
measurement of how much of each element that
18:47
actually is. Plus also you have
18:49
to understand like the history of the sample too like how much
18:51
like radiation from the sum was it exposed to all of that
18:53
kind of stuff. And it means that
18:55
we essentially know that you know a lot of
18:58
meteorites were formed not long after the solar system
19:00
itself and so we can sort
19:02
of age-date the solar system in that way and
19:04
the oldest things in it and know that the
19:06
Sun and all the solar system formed around about
19:08
four and a half billion years ago and that's
19:11
how we get those kind of numbers. Yes
19:14
we specifically get those numbers the three
19:16
of us. Yes yes. When we do the
19:18
calculations. We did the Royal Wii there. When
19:21
we specifically run the numbers that's the
19:23
other one. Amazing. Well
19:25
thank you everyone for sending in your
19:28
questions do keep them coming. You
19:30
can email podcast.res.ac.uk and we're
19:32
also on Instagram at SupermassivePod.
19:34
We'll be back in next
19:36
time with a full-length episode
19:38
all about the lunar standstill
19:40
which is very mysterious sounding.
19:43
I love it you'll have to tune in to
19:45
find out what that's all about but until next
19:47
time everybody happy stargazing.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More