Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
It's day, it's twice as long as
0:04
its year. Why is it so dense?
0:06
Then it's got to have so much
0:08
iron in its core to make it
0:10
that heavy. And Mercury certainly moves pretty
0:12
quickly around the sun, but it's an
0:14
odd little planet. Hello
0:20
and welcome to the Supermassive
0:22
podcast from the Royal Astronomical
0:24
Society with me, science journalist
0:26
Izzy Clark and astrophysicist Dr.
0:28
Becky Smithers. We are
0:30
finally completing our tour of the solar
0:32
system this month with a trip to
0:34
Mercury. Izzy, I mean, it's about
0:36
time. I actually, I looked back, right? Oh
0:39
no, don't. We first did Jupiter in March
0:42
2023. So it only took us 18 months to do a
0:44
trip around the solar system. Well,
0:47
how long would an actual mission time look
0:49
like? It's not bad in terms of missions. Yeah. We're
0:53
still quicker than most anyway. And I swear, if anyone writes
0:55
in to be like, what about Pluto? I'd be like, no,
0:57
no. Anyway,
1:02
what do we know about Mercury and
1:04
what is the latest mission on its
1:06
way to study the planet further? And
1:09
as always, Dr. Robert Massey, the deputy director
1:11
of the Royal Astronomical Society is here. So
1:14
Robert, what is Mercury like as a
1:16
planet? Well, you could sum it up as
1:18
hot, small and close to the sun or hot and cold and
1:20
small and close to the sun. And in many ways, it looks
1:23
a lot like our moon. If you
1:25
look at all the photographs from space probes, it's got a
1:27
really bleak, cratered surface. And it's not that much bigger than
1:29
the moon either. It's only
1:31
5000 kilometers across, got no atmosphere to
1:33
speak of. And it also
1:35
has this sort of like baked Alaska quality. So
1:38
for those of us who ate that dessert in the 1980s, it's
1:40
the closest planet to the sun. So it's
1:42
very hot. It gets up to 400 degrees C. But
1:45
also, because there's no atmosphere in the shadowed regions,
1:47
it goes down to minus 200 C. So,
1:50
you know, it's 200 Celsius. Imagine this huge contrast
1:52
in temperatures and it might even be waterized in
1:54
the poles. Now, one
1:57
of the things people often ask is, you know, how can you see it
1:59
in the sky? because it is one of
2:01
the naked eye planets and it's definitely something that
2:03
our ancestors would have seen and been aware of.
2:06
But it's always a bit of a challenge because it's quite close to the
2:08
sun in the sky as well as being close to the sun in reality.
2:11
But as it happens, you can catch
2:13
it before sunrise in early September, 2024.
2:16
So if you're listening to this episode early on after it goes
2:18
out, you've got a chance of being able to do that. You
2:21
can also see it in the morning at the end of the
2:23
year. I'm thinking of this in the UK and Northern Hemisphere perspective.
2:25
It's reasonably bright. You
2:27
need to know, it helps save one of the
2:29
apps to find it. The good telescope shows you
2:31
may be a phase that changes like Venus does
2:33
because it's moving between the earth and the sun.
2:36
So to do better than that, we really needed space
2:38
probes. And after all, that's what this episode is about,
2:40
to find out more about that and you'll hear later.
2:43
What a perfect setup, she asks Robert. We'll catch
2:45
up with you later in the show for some
2:47
more questions and this month's Stargazing Tips. So
2:50
if we turn to the history books, Mercury
2:52
is the messenger of the Roman gods zipping
2:54
around from place to place, which is how
2:56
the planet got its name. Mercury
2:59
certainly moves pretty quickly around the sun,
3:01
but it's an odd little planet and
3:03
it's over to our pal planetary scientist,
3:05
Dr. David Rothery from the Open University
3:08
to tell us more. Well,
3:10
Mercury is the smallest of the
3:12
planets, but it's bigger than the
3:14
moon. It's 2,400 and something kilometers
3:16
in radius. It's a
3:18
rocky body. It's the closest planet
3:20
to the sun and it's the most elliptical
3:24
orbit. At its closest,
3:26
it's 30% of the earth's sun distance
3:28
away from the sun and its furthest,
3:30
it's 40% of the earth's sun distance
3:32
away from the sun. So
3:34
it's quite an elongated orbit. The
3:36
surface is very hot by day, as
3:38
you would expect being that close to the
3:40
sun, 400 degrees Celsius
3:43
or thereabouts, but at night it
3:45
gets very cold because there's no
3:47
atmosphere. So it just radiates all
3:49
that heat away to space. So
3:51
big temperature extremes and
3:53
its day length is weird
3:55
because let's get this right.
3:58
It's day. twice as long
4:01
as its year. It rotates
4:03
three times for every two orbits
4:05
around the Sun and the combined
4:07
effect of that means sunrise to
4:09
sunrise takes two orbits of the
4:11
Sun to achieve. So it
4:13
has nights which are
4:16
88 Earth days in length so it's dark
4:18
for a long time which is why it's
4:20
able to get so cold at night because
4:23
there's a long time for all that daytime
4:25
heat to be radiated back to space. Yeah
4:28
we briefly covered mercury before as well
4:30
and we talk about it I think
4:33
someone described it as its
4:36
80% core so you know
4:38
we've got these huge temperature
4:40
changes it's a rocky body
4:42
so what's it like on that surface? Well
4:45
you're right Izzy it has a very
4:47
big core we think it lost most
4:49
of its rock in a giant impact
4:51
during its formation process so that strips
4:53
away most of the rock but there's
4:55
enough rock left to give it a
4:57
rock covering about 400 kilometres depth
5:00
on top of its big iron core and
5:03
that rock is surprisingly
5:05
interesting I'm a geologist and I'm great
5:08
at this it's
5:10
a really fascinating place for geology. You'd expect
5:12
the rock just to be some kind of
5:14
parched cinder but no it's not
5:17
it's got volatile elements
5:19
in considerable abundance. The
5:22
crust that we see today was largely
5:24
formed by volcanic eruptions of lava flows
5:27
stuff oozing out and flooding across the
5:29
surface layer after layer of lava flows
5:32
which have been intensely created by impact
5:34
but the most recent volcanism
5:37
has been explosive volcanism blasting holes
5:39
in the crust and
5:41
you don't get that unless the
5:44
rising molten rock the magma has
5:46
got volatiles in it that will turn
5:48
to gas or else maybe we're
5:51
encountering the volatiles as
5:53
the magma nears the surface maybe there's a
5:55
volatile rich layer just below the surface but
5:57
either way when
6:00
the magma is not confined by much
6:02
weight of overlying rock, the gas comes
6:04
out of solution and it goes bang
6:06
and it gets explosive eruptions. And that's
6:08
a wonderful history for a volcanologist like
6:10
me. And we've also got patches where
6:13
volatiles are escaping even today. It
6:15
looks moth-eaten in places. It's a
6:18
process that we call hollow formation.
6:20
These hollows are 10 meters, 20
6:22
meters deep and hundreds of meters
6:25
wide. They're flat bottom steep-sided depressions
6:27
where stuff is just dissipating away
6:29
to space. And we don't
6:31
know what's being lost. We know mercury is
6:33
rocky but in places it's so
6:36
rich in volatiles that the chemical bonds can
6:38
be broken and the atoms just drift
6:40
away to space leaving you these
6:43
strange flat bottom depressions in the
6:45
ground. It's weird. There's stuff going
6:47
on today that we didn't expect.
6:50
I love
6:52
hearing you talk about this. I
6:54
mean so when we talk about volatiles
6:56
those are those chemical elements, chemical compounds
6:58
that are vaporized
7:01
essentially. So what
7:03
chemical elements are they? What can
7:05
we know about the chemical composition
7:07
of mercury and then what impact
7:09
does that have for it as
7:11
a planet? We don't
7:13
know what all the volatiles are. We do
7:15
know that there's a lot
7:17
of sulfur on mercury, 2 to 4
7:20
percent sulfur wherever you look. That's a
7:22
result from NASA's messenger probe which orbited
7:24
mercury 2011 to
7:26
2015. It had an x-ray spectrometer
7:28
which could detect the sulfur. We
7:30
don't think it's sulfur as elemental
7:32
sulfur. It's in compounds. It's calcium,
7:35
magnesium, sulfide, something like that. As
7:37
well as sulfur we've got a
7:39
lot of sodium and potassium and
7:42
chlorine and we think probably
7:44
that what's being lost in
7:46
the volcanic explosions is
7:49
gases containing sulfur. It
7:52
could be carbon disulfide. It could be
7:54
hydrogen sulfide. I doubt that because we're
7:56
not expecting much hydrogen. It could be
7:58
it could be sulfur. oxide. We're
8:00
not sure, but gases containing sulfur,
8:02
because the deposits that we see
8:05
on the ground around these explosive
8:07
volcanic vents are deficient in
8:09
sulfur. So they've lost their sulfur, it's
8:11
been turned to vapor. Maybe
8:13
that was a vapor that was driving the explosion.
8:16
Where the hollows are forming, where we've
8:18
got passive, gradual,
8:21
non-explosive loss of material, and that's
8:23
got to be by breaking chemical
8:25
bonds, we don't understand and
8:27
we're going to understand the chemical composition
8:30
of mercury much better two
8:32
years from now, when we have
8:35
the European Space Agency's pro-Bepi Colombo
8:37
in orbit, with its British built
8:39
x-ray spectrometer called MIX, Mercury Imaging
8:42
X-ray Spectrometer. That will measure 20
8:44
or very about chemical
8:46
elements with spatial
8:49
resolutions as fine as about
8:51
10 kilometers. So we'll get very
8:53
detailed chemical mapping and then
8:55
we'll begin to understand what's being lost.
8:58
Mercury, obviously our planet is closest
9:00
to the Sun, can it protect
9:02
itself from the impact
9:04
of the Sun in any way? Well, Mercury
9:08
has a magnetic field. We've mentioned
9:10
its large core and the
9:12
outer part of that is molten and
9:14
generating a magnetic field. So it has
9:16
a magnetosphere and the solar wind streaming
9:18
out from the Sun, mostly protons, will
9:21
hit the magnetic
9:23
field and be deflected around the planet.
9:25
So the solar wind doesn't hit the
9:27
surface most of the time. Now, when
9:29
there's a solar storm, the
9:31
edge of a magnetic field or the magneto
9:34
pores, if we want to be technical, gets
9:36
pushed down to Mercury's surface. So those times
9:39
charged particles from the Sun do impinge
9:41
on the surface. So
9:43
if you think the aurora here is
9:46
pretty on Mercury, when
9:48
there's a big solar storm, you've got stuff
9:50
coming right down to the surface and
9:53
irradiating the ground. And that's another process
9:55
that could be responsible for forming Mercury's
9:57
hollows when the solar wind reaches the
9:59
ground. another way to break chemical
10:01
bonds. So it is
10:03
a very hostile environment. There's no
10:05
atmosphere really. There are atoms associated
10:08
with mercury but the
10:10
atmosphere is so diffuse that molecules are
10:12
more likely to drift off to space
10:14
or bounce back to the surface rather
10:16
than bumping into each other. So there's
10:18
no atmospheric pressure on mercury really. It's
10:20
just called an exosphere. Thank
10:23
you to David Brodery. So
10:25
Becky, what's mercury's density and
10:27
how do we know that?
10:30
So mercury's density is just a bit less than
10:32
Earth's. It's around about 98% of the density of
10:35
Earth at around about 5.4 grams
10:38
per centimeter cubed. It actually makes it the second
10:40
most dense planet in the solar system. The Earth
10:43
is the densest, right? And that's
10:45
actually really interesting, especially
10:47
if we think about it in comparison to
10:49
our moon. As Robert said, it looks very
10:51
similar to the moon. It's just a little
10:54
bit bigger than the moon as
10:56
well. And yet it is five times
10:58
more massive than the moon, which is
11:00
what makes it so dense, right?
11:02
And that's really interesting to think about like,
11:04
okay, why is it so dense? Then it's
11:06
got to have so much iron in its
11:09
core to make it that heavy and
11:11
that dense as well. Now, as
11:14
for how we know this, we
11:16
need two things, right? To work out density.
11:19
You need to work out the planet's like
11:21
diameter, its radius, its size across, and then
11:23
its mass, right? So the diameter we get
11:25
from knowing how far away it is from
11:27
us and its apparent size in the sky,
11:29
but mass is a little bit trickier to
11:32
work out. If planets have moons,
11:34
it's really easy because you can just get
11:36
it from how the moons orbit the planet
11:38
with the Kepler's laws. But
11:40
mercury doesn't have a
11:42
moon, so how do you do this? Really,
11:44
you've got to send a satellite to it
11:46
to get a really accurate measurement of this
11:48
to like measure essentially its gravitational pull on
11:51
the satellite and then you can work out, okay,
11:53
what's its mass, how heavy it is. And the
11:55
Mariner mission to Mercury actually did this back in
11:57
the 1970s and that's what then
12:00
led to the determination of its density and
12:02
it being so dense and this idea that
12:04
it must have this huge
12:06
iron core. We're talking like 85% of Mercury's got
12:08
to be made of iron to explain how heavy
12:11
it is and how dense it is. And so
12:13
then you start thinking, well, how did it get
12:15
so much iron? Like, is it because
12:18
there just happened to be that much
12:20
iron in that area of the solar system after
12:22
the sun formed, like heavier elements perhaps sank towards
12:24
the center? Or is it because
12:26
of another like giant impact between two planets that
12:28
occurred in the early solar system in the same
12:31
way that we think that our moon was formed
12:33
through a giant impact with another planet in the
12:35
earth in the early solar system? And
12:38
do we see planets like Mercury
12:40
in other solar systems or are
12:42
we special? Well,
12:46
we've seen super-Mercuries is what
12:48
people call it. Like you must have heard
12:51
this before, like we find super-Earths and like
12:53
super-Neptunes. We find super-Mercuries, right? They are a
12:56
very similar density, but they are bigger
12:58
than Mercury, right? There's no, as far
13:00
as I know it, there's no Mercury
13:02
analogues that have been found.
13:04
Now, even though we haven't found
13:06
them, I don't think that means that they don't
13:08
exist, right? I don't think that means that our
13:11
solar system is special because we've got a Mercury
13:13
kind of planet so close to the
13:15
sun. And I think that's because our ways
13:17
of finding planets are really
13:19
biased to more massive planets,
13:21
like Jupiter sized, that orbit
13:23
really close to their star
13:26
so that, you know, that their orbit, so, you
13:28
know, maybe once every month or once every few
13:30
days, which means that when we find planets through
13:32
the transit method, which is when like they pass
13:34
in front of their star and block some of
13:36
the star's light, that's a lot easier
13:38
if they do it more often so we can spot the
13:40
signal more often and if they're bigger because they block more
13:43
light. And then the other way that
13:45
we've got of finding planets is the tug that
13:47
they have on their star, right? They don't orbit
13:49
the star, the star's not static, the star and the planet
13:51
orbit each other so there's this like a center of mass
13:54
between them. So for example, Jupiter as it
13:56
orbits the sun pulls that center
13:58
of mass between them outside. of the surface
14:00
of the sun. So the sun orbits
14:02
that little point outside of its surface, it
14:04
wobbles around on the sky and we can
14:06
spot if there's planets like Jupiter in orbit
14:09
around stars because they wobble. Mercury
14:11
however, is not
14:13
gonna give you a wobble that's gonna be anywhere
14:15
near noticeable in terms of if you
14:17
have a similar planet around a star elsewhere in
14:19
the universe as well. Just because it is so
14:21
small, again it doesn't block a lot of light
14:23
either for a transit, so it's unlikely it will
14:25
find those as well. So I don't
14:28
think we're unique in the fact that we have
14:30
Mercurys. I think they must exist out there, it's
14:32
just that we haven't ever found any Mercury analogues.
14:34
There is some hope though with the habitable worlds
14:37
observatory that's, you know, NASA is in planning stages
14:39
for now, not gonna launch until like the 2040s,
14:41
but the idea is that you have a good
14:43
enough imager on board that you could image
14:47
at least Earth-like planets, probably
14:50
capture Venus as well, whether
14:52
you'd be able to get Mercury if it's
14:54
further away from its star maybe, but I
14:56
think that's a big big question. I think
14:58
the focus is more on Earth-like planets than
15:01
Mercury-like planets sadly. Okay, but
15:03
Mercury's orbit is an interesting one and
15:05
it helped to explain general relativity, so
15:07
can you explain that one? Yeah, yeah,
15:09
so I mean the best way to
15:11
describe what Mercury's orbits, I mean most
15:13
planets' orbits look like is, you know,
15:15
a spirograph. Do you remember spirograph from
15:18
when we were kids, right? The little
15:20
game where you put your pen in
15:22
a little cog and you'd like turn
15:24
it around in a circle. Yeah, so
15:26
basically, if you don't know what we're
15:28
talking about, essentially like you think
15:30
about a planet making a loop around its star
15:32
and just tracing that same path over and over
15:34
again, but actually once it's made the loop, it
15:36
doesn't really join up with where it
15:39
was before and it does another loop
15:41
of its orbit, sort of next, just next to where it
15:43
was before and you can see how that sort of spirals
15:45
out to make almost like a pattern, like a, like almost
15:47
like a petalism of flower, right? It's what it ends up
15:50
sort of looking like, right? And this
15:52
is like scientific term for this
15:54
is perihelion precession. Perihelion means like
15:56
closest point to us to the
15:58
sun in a planet. orbit,
16:00
essentially what it means is that that
16:02
point is moving around a circle, really,
16:04
is what's happening. It's where your pen
16:07
is in each paragraph. All
16:09
planets do this, process ever so slightly,
16:12
and that can be explained by Newton's laws of
16:14
gravity and Kepler's laws of motion and things like
16:16
that. But
16:18
for Mercury, the effect is
16:21
so pronounced, like it's so much bigger
16:23
than for the other planets because it's
16:25
so close into the sun and the
16:27
pull of the sun's gravity that
16:30
this is what gives it this bigger, more
16:32
pronounced effect when this happens. The Newton's laws
16:34
of gravity can't explain this. You
16:36
have to start considering all of the relativistic
16:38
effects that come from the fact that you're
16:40
in a stronger gravitational field because you're closer
16:42
to the sun, which is where Einstein's theory
16:44
of general relativity comes in, which explains gravity
16:47
in terms of relativistic effects. And
16:49
it was actually one of the very first proofs
16:51
of general relativity when Einstein was actually putting together
16:53
his new theory of gravity. It was like,
16:55
oh, well, here's this one problem that no one's
16:57
been able to explain for ages, you know, like
16:59
Mercury's orbit. Let's see if it fits. And it
17:01
does. It fits really, really well. We've
17:05
seen two missions travel to Mercury before.
17:08
We had NASA's Mariner 10 spacecraft in
17:10
the 70s, making the
17:12
journey for the very first time, and it
17:14
made three flybys. And then we
17:16
had NASA's messenger mission, which studied Mercury from 2011
17:18
to 2015. So what did they show us? And
17:20
what is
17:24
ESA's latest mission, Bepi Colombo,
17:26
aiming to find? It's
17:28
something that I asked Dr. Simon Lindsay
17:30
from the University of Leicester, who's the
17:32
instrument scientist of MIX, which is one
17:34
of the instruments on board of the
17:36
spacecraft. We knew almost nothing
17:39
about it before those missions went there.
17:41
So Mariner was able to find that it
17:43
had a magnetic field, which is very odd.
17:46
It's imaged about half of the surface. It
17:48
measured this temperature differential, but it was only
17:51
able to do so much. You've got these
17:53
three flybys. They each last a few hours,
17:55
and that was the whole of the mission.
17:57
Messenger is the source of basics. clear
18:00
everything we know now. So
18:02
it was orbiting more or less North to
18:04
South. It mapped the whole surface for the
18:06
first time. It measured the composition of the
18:08
surface. It mapped out the
18:11
magnetic field. It took all sorts
18:13
of altitude measurements that allowed us to build up
18:15
this topographic map of the planet and yeah, pretty
18:17
much everything else we know comes from that mission.
18:20
Yeah. And now we've got
18:22
Beppe Colombo, which launched in 2018. So
18:25
what was the aims of this mission? What
18:28
can you tell me about Beppe Colombo? So
18:31
Beppe Colombo has a few sort of USPs.
18:34
One of our unique points is there
18:36
are two spacecraft make up, well, two
18:38
science spacecraft that make up Beppe Colombo.
18:40
So we have European MPO, Mercury Planetary
18:42
Orbiter, which goes into a low orbit.
18:45
It's polar like messenger, maps
18:47
the surface. So it's got objectives to
18:49
do with the composition of the planet,
18:51
the formation of the planet. It also
18:53
maps its magnetic field at low altitude.
18:56
And then we have MIO, the magnetospheric
18:58
orbiter, which orbits further out from the
19:01
planet. That's there to map out the
19:03
magnetic environment, to look at the interaction
19:06
of the planet and the solar wind
19:08
to measure the planet's exosphere, all these
19:10
sorts of things. We are trying
19:13
to answer these sort of quite fundamental questions
19:16
about the planet. It's this weird, unusual
19:18
planet. It's the closest to the sun.
19:21
We call it an end member of the solar system. So
19:23
it's the smallest planet. It's the closest to
19:26
the sun. It's the extreme in quite a
19:28
lot of ways. And Beppe is
19:30
very much looking at what that means about
19:32
the formation of Mercury and its properties now
19:34
and what that means for the solar system
19:37
as a whole. And so what's on board?
19:39
How is it going to find out all of
19:41
this information? Because there is there's a lot packed
19:43
in there. Yes, yes,
19:45
absolutely. So there are
19:48
a lot of instruments, exactly
19:50
how many depends on how you define them. But there's
19:52
about 16. Okay. So
19:55
on MPO, the instruments are
19:57
kind of focused around the surface, but
19:59
not exclusively on
20:01
MPO. We have visible camera. We have
20:03
an infrared camera. We have
20:05
a suite of exospheric instrument. We have
20:08
a magnetometer. We have a gamma-ray spectrometer.
20:10
We have a X-ray
20:12
spectrometer, which I work on.
20:14
And I am sure I'm leaving someone
20:16
out, but that's the one I can remember. I mean, you've
20:18
done well to list as many as you have, to
20:20
be fair. Thank you. Thank you very much. And
20:24
then on MIO, like I say, they're
20:26
a little bit more focused on magnetospheric
20:28
stuff. So there's a magnetometer again, there's
20:31
a plasma wave instrument, and then there's
20:33
a large number of different particle instruments,
20:35
electrons, protons, and ions and
20:37
so forth, and measures how they move
20:39
around inside the environment of the system.
20:42
Yeah. And you work
20:44
on an instrument called MIX.
20:46
So what is that doing?
20:49
So MIX stands for
20:51
Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer.
20:53
Which is very confusing, because it's MIX with
20:55
an S. And I, when we first started, before
20:57
we started recording, I was like, can I
20:59
just check how we pronounce this? Absolutely, everyone
21:02
calls it MIXes the first time. So
21:05
you will only understand the name properly if you
21:07
speak Finnish. So we
21:10
are part of a
21:12
suite of two instruments. We're a pair
21:14
with another instrument called SIX, which is
21:17
Finnish, hence this whole thing. SIX stands
21:19
for Solar Intensity X-ray Spectrometer. And this
21:21
is a pun, if you know Finnish,
21:24
because MIX-y is Finnish for Y, SIX-y
21:26
is Finnish for because. I love that,
21:29
that's very good. We often
21:31
talk about this, like the way that
21:33
scientists and physicists name things, I
21:35
love a pun. Like the... We
21:37
are addicted to acronyms, really. Okay,
21:40
so what is MIX doing and how does
21:42
it work? Okay, so it's an X-ray spectrometer.
21:44
And what that means is it's measuring X-rays,
21:46
that's the obvious part. The reasoning
21:48
behind this is that X-rays are
21:51
continuously being put out by the sun.
21:54
Those X-rays get absorbed in any material you
21:56
put in the way. So in our
21:58
case, that's the surface of MIX. Mercury
22:01
has no atmosphere, so that means none of those
22:03
x-rays get absorbed on the way in. They get
22:05
absorbed in the surface of the planet. Atoms in
22:07
the surface gain energy from these
22:09
x-rays and electron gets promoted or ejected
22:12
from the atom, leaving a gap. And
22:15
then that gap is filled by an electron from a
22:17
higher shell in that atom.
22:19
And in the process it emits an x-ray
22:22
and that's the x-ray that we're measuring. And
22:24
the reason that this is interesting is that
22:26
the energy of that x-ray will
22:28
tell you what atom it came from.
22:31
So if you're able to measure that
22:33
energy you can say that came from
22:36
silicon, calcium, magnesium, whatever. So that's what
22:38
we do. We fly around connecting these
22:40
x-rays, tracing the vector where
22:42
they came from on the surface and saying
22:44
there is these elements in this location on
22:46
the surface. And that means that we can
22:48
build up a map of the composition at
22:50
the surface. I mean that
22:53
makes total sense. So where is
22:55
is Beppy now? It
22:57
is rapidly approaching Mercury right now. The
22:59
trajectory of the mission is very very
23:01
long. It launched in 2018 and it's
23:03
still a couple of years till it
23:05
gets there. This trajectory has
23:07
several flybys in it. So we flew
23:09
past Earth, we flew past Venus twice,
23:11
flew past Mercury three times so far
23:13
and then we will fly past again
23:16
on the 4th of September. That will
23:18
be the 4th of 6 flybys. So
23:20
we've got two more Mercury flybys to
23:22
go before we finally go into orbit.
23:24
I mean that sounds really exciting and
23:26
so we've got, you said a few
23:28
more years until Beppy actually
23:31
reaches Mercury. So is there anything a
23:33
bit more specific than that and then
23:35
what will it be getting started on?
23:37
So it gets started in 2026, a
23:40
science mission begins. We expect
23:42
it to last a year. We hope it
23:44
will last two years. We expect to be
23:46
cooked before too long. But
23:48
in that time we are really sort
23:50
of poised because we know we've
23:52
got this short mission and we've been waiting a
23:54
very long time to get that data down. So
23:56
we're very poised to spring into action as soon
23:58
as this data's set. starts coming down and make
24:01
the best fish we can with the data we
24:03
get back. Thank you to
24:05
Simon Lindsay from the University of Leicester. This
24:11
is the Supermassive podcast on the
24:13
Royal Astronomical Society with me, astrophysicist
24:16
Dr. Becky Snaath-Est and science journalist
24:18
Izzy Clark. This month is all
24:20
about mercury. So let's dive into
24:22
some listener questions. Becky at Kashiteed
24:24
on Instagram wants to know, and
24:27
I hope I've said that handled
24:29
correctly. They want to
24:31
know, why doesn't the gravity of the
24:33
sun and other planets cause mercury to
24:35
fall into the sun? Well, it's because
24:37
it's in orbit essentially. So it's moving
24:40
with enough speed in its orbit to
24:42
keep it there, despite the fact that the sun
24:44
is still pulling on it due to gravity. Like
24:47
I always like to think about, you know, when
24:49
we put things like satellites into orbit around earth,
24:51
right? We have to give them enough energy so
24:53
that we throw them so that they're almost making
24:55
this like perfect circle around the earth so that
24:57
like they're falling to earth, but they're always just
24:59
falling past it. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, it's
25:02
like a similar thing, right? For planets orbits as
25:04
well. If, if you were, you
25:06
know, wanting to actually cause mercury to fall
25:08
into the sun, which, you know, let's, let's,
25:10
let's go easy on the little guy. Let's
25:12
just say we were evil villains and we
25:15
had this power. Yeah. Yeah. And
25:17
we had some minions. Um, we would need
25:19
to like nudge with enough
25:21
energy to like, you know,
25:24
remove energy from, from mercury, like, or give it
25:26
some energy to change its orbit in some ways
25:28
you could do that with maybe like a, again,
25:30
like a collision between mercury and a massive object.
25:32
Like I don't know, an asteroid would have enough
25:34
energy to do this, but you know, another planet
25:36
maybe would give it enough energy to change its
25:38
orbit in some way. And as soon as you
25:40
change the orbit, you make it unstable. And that's
25:43
when then the pull of the sun's gravity might
25:45
start to win out and pull it
25:47
towards the sun. But for now it's just sort of falling
25:50
perfectly around the sun. So it never
25:52
falls into the sun. Okay. Thanks, Becky.
25:55
And Robert, iMUSIF sent an interesting
25:57
question about averages and they say.
25:59
on average, Mercury is the closest
26:01
planet to Earth. Do you find
26:04
it counterintuitive? So let's look into
26:06
this a little bit more. Is
26:08
that true? And can you explain
26:11
it? Yeah. So I'm music.
26:13
Yes, I definitely found it counterintuitive. And I
26:15
was thinking, so
26:18
I had to do a bit of sense checking and reading
26:20
around. And there was an article in Physics Today describing this
26:22
work, I think it was five or six years ago now.
26:25
And the crucial point is the average distance
26:27
between the planets. And what that's taking into
26:29
account using their method is the fact that
26:31
say Venus, although it gets closest to the,
26:33
closer to the Earth than any other planet
26:36
and then Mars and so on, spends
26:39
an awful lot of the time further away as
26:41
well and goes around the sun slowly. So when
26:43
you crunch the numbers, you find that on average
26:46
and only on average, Mercury is closer to the
26:48
Earth. So is it counterintuitive?
26:51
Definitely yes. Does it tell us a lot about the
26:53
layout of the solar system? Well, not to my mind,
26:55
because you know the order of the planets and the
26:57
sun is still the same or at least the order
26:59
of the planetary orbits. It just
27:01
says that sometimes, or a
27:03
lot of the time Mercury is closer to the Earth
27:05
than Venus, just because Venus happens to be on the
27:07
other side of the sun. So it's a curiosity more
27:09
than anything else. But yes, one I was glad to
27:11
find out about because I have a feeling somebody else
27:13
will ask me that having read the article as well.
27:16
I was going to say, do you not
27:18
remember when the animation of this hit the
27:21
internet like a few years back? And I
27:23
just remember saying this collective minds blow. Like,
27:25
yes, the internet is everyone's like, wait, what?
27:28
It's overturning everything we learned in primary school,
27:30
isn't it? Yeah, because we all think about
27:32
it again as static, like all lined up
27:34
and like... I had to deal with
27:36
Pluto being demoted from a planet and now there's this. What
27:39
else is coming? If you need five minutes, Robert,
27:42
we'll understand. Yeah, I'll take a moment. And
27:45
Becky, Elise asks, why isn't Mercury
27:47
the hottest planet in the solar
27:49
system despite it being the closest
27:51
to the sun? Yeah,
27:53
great question, Elise. I think it just shows
27:56
how important atmospheres are
27:58
for Pluto. holding
28:00
on to heat, right? Because
28:04
Mercury barely has an atmosphere,
28:06
Venus, incredibly thick atmosphere. So Mercury, what
28:08
happens is radiation from the sun just
28:11
hits the surface of Mercury and bounces straight
28:13
back off again and is lost to space,
28:16
right? That heat is not held onto, it
28:18
is just lost to space, right? So you
28:21
can sort of instantaneously heat the surface where you
28:23
are in sunlight in that sort of way when
28:25
you know sort of like
28:27
it could be a cooler winter day and the
28:30
air could be cold, but if you feel the
28:32
sun on your face, it feels warm because you
28:34
have the energy hitting into you. It's that kind
28:36
of a sort of heat that Mercury has. And
28:39
that's cause like I said, Mercury's atmosphere is
28:41
so thin. The actual only atmosphere that Mercury
28:44
has is stuff from the surface that's bounced
28:46
up off the surface as radiation from the
28:48
sun hits into it, right? So
28:50
it's almost like little bits of like rock
28:52
and stuff that is the atmosphere. It's so
28:55
incredibly, incredibly thin. It's a hundred trillion times
28:57
thinner than Earth's atmosphere. Yeah.
28:59
It's just crazy to think about, right? Right,
29:02
yeah. Whereas Venus's atmosphere is 93 times
29:04
thicker than Earth's. Right?
29:09
So all that gas in Venus's atmosphere can
29:11
absorb all that reflected light that's come back
29:13
off the surface. Right? And so
29:15
it can store it there in the atmosphere. So the
29:17
atmosphere warms up and that's what makes Venus the hottest
29:19
planet compared to Mercury because it has
29:21
both that incident sort of heat that's on it
29:24
but also the atmosphere to keep it warm
29:26
too. And Elise, I would recommend that you listen
29:28
to our Venus episode as well. Yeah. Yeah.
29:32
Robert, we've also had a question about
29:34
life on Mercury from Fiona and she
29:36
asks, what's the likelihood
29:38
of life being found on Mercury with
29:40
the knowledge from Earth life? Well,
29:44
Fiona, I think sadly it's really quite close
29:46
to zero. And the reason is, look, it's
29:48
the things we've been talking about, Becky was
29:50
just mentioning, no atmosphere does not help, you
29:52
know, huge variations in
29:54
temperature as a result. So incredibly hot
29:57
and also incredibly cold in different places.
30:00
of liquid water, which is seen as
30:02
not necessarily an absolute prerequisite for
30:04
life, but certainly helpful. And
30:06
you know, never say never, maybe, but if there
30:09
was life there, it would have to be hiding
30:11
in some very much more benign environment under the
30:13
surface that we don't think we're really aware of
30:15
exists at all. So it seems really unlikely. I
30:18
guess, you know, thinking about this, could you
30:20
have something that some very specialized bacteria or
30:22
something perhaps, but it's, to my man, it's
30:25
very difficult to see how they'd get started
30:27
in the first place. You know, I could
30:29
imagine somebody doing some genetic engineering on earth
30:31
and making something that could live under the
30:33
surface of mercury, but it seems very unlikely
30:35
ever arose there, at least to me, happy to
30:37
be contradicted by an astrobiologist. But I think it's
30:40
a long shot. Or Robert, don't forget what Jeff
30:42
Goldblum taught us from last episode as well. Yes.
30:45
Life finds a way. Exactly. From
30:47
Jurassic Park. Channel Jurassic Park. Yeah.
30:50
I guess you've got to think about like,
30:52
you know, we've shown that the tardy graze,
30:54
the little, what people call them water beds,
30:56
those little things, they've survived on the outside
30:58
of the International Space Station. So clearly, like,
31:01
you know, no atmosphere and high radiation intense
31:03
environments, certain types of life can
31:05
obviously survive it. But like you say, it's
31:07
the trigger to get it started. Yeah. Yeah.
31:10
Like that's the weird thing. I think we
31:12
could probably like contaminate Mercury surface and see
31:14
if life survived, but I probably wouldn't get
31:16
that past the ethics board. Yeah, exactly.
31:18
I really hope that doesn't happen.
31:20
Exactly. Yeah. It's evolution, you know,
31:22
just like, yes, starting point is
31:25
life evolves to these extreme environments, but it
31:27
must be a struggle to get started. Yeah.
31:30
Okay. So thank you
31:32
to everyone who sent in questions. And
31:34
if you want to send in any
31:37
questions for a future episode, then you
31:39
can email podcast at ras.ac.uk or find
31:41
us on Instagram at supermassivepod. Feel free
31:44
to slide into the DMs on that
31:46
one. So shall we finish with
31:48
some stargazing? Robert, what can we see in
31:50
the night Skyless Month? Yeah, quite a lot
31:52
as it happens. The nights are drawing in equinoxes
31:54
on the 22nd of September. So
31:57
for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, you know, moving into the
31:59
autumn and winter.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More