We Made It To Mercury!

We Made It To Mercury!

Released Wednesday, 4th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
We Made It To Mercury!

We Made It To Mercury!

We Made It To Mercury!

We Made It To Mercury!

Wednesday, 4th September 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

It's day, it's twice as long as

0:04

its year. Why is it so dense?

0:06

Then it's got to have so much

0:08

iron in its core to make it

0:10

that heavy. And Mercury certainly moves pretty

0:12

quickly around the sun, but it's an

0:14

odd little planet. Hello

0:20

and welcome to the Supermassive

0:22

podcast from the Royal Astronomical

0:24

Society with me, science journalist

0:26

Izzy Clark and astrophysicist Dr.

0:28

Becky Smithers. We are

0:30

finally completing our tour of the solar

0:32

system this month with a trip to

0:34

Mercury. Izzy, I mean, it's about

0:36

time. I actually, I looked back, right? Oh

0:39

no, don't. We first did Jupiter in March

0:42

2023. So it only took us 18 months to do a

0:44

trip around the solar system. Well,

0:47

how long would an actual mission time look

0:49

like? It's not bad in terms of missions. Yeah. We're

0:53

still quicker than most anyway. And I swear, if anyone writes

0:55

in to be like, what about Pluto? I'd be like, no,

0:57

no. Anyway,

1:02

what do we know about Mercury and

1:04

what is the latest mission on its

1:06

way to study the planet further? And

1:09

as always, Dr. Robert Massey, the deputy director

1:11

of the Royal Astronomical Society is here. So

1:14

Robert, what is Mercury like as a

1:16

planet? Well, you could sum it up as

1:18

hot, small and close to the sun or hot and cold and

1:20

small and close to the sun. And in many ways, it looks

1:23

a lot like our moon. If you

1:25

look at all the photographs from space probes, it's got a

1:27

really bleak, cratered surface. And it's not that much bigger than

1:29

the moon either. It's only

1:31

5000 kilometers across, got no atmosphere to

1:33

speak of. And it also

1:35

has this sort of like baked Alaska quality. So

1:38

for those of us who ate that dessert in the 1980s, it's

1:40

the closest planet to the sun. So it's

1:42

very hot. It gets up to 400 degrees C. But

1:45

also, because there's no atmosphere in the shadowed regions,

1:47

it goes down to minus 200 C. So,

1:50

you know, it's 200 Celsius. Imagine this huge contrast

1:52

in temperatures and it might even be waterized in

1:54

the poles. Now, one

1:57

of the things people often ask is, you know, how can you see it

1:59

in the sky? because it is one of

2:01

the naked eye planets and it's definitely something that

2:03

our ancestors would have seen and been aware of.

2:06

But it's always a bit of a challenge because it's quite close to the

2:08

sun in the sky as well as being close to the sun in reality.

2:11

But as it happens, you can catch

2:13

it before sunrise in early September, 2024.

2:16

So if you're listening to this episode early on after it goes

2:18

out, you've got a chance of being able to do that. You

2:21

can also see it in the morning at the end of the

2:23

year. I'm thinking of this in the UK and Northern Hemisphere perspective.

2:25

It's reasonably bright. You

2:27

need to know, it helps save one of the

2:29

apps to find it. The good telescope shows you

2:31

may be a phase that changes like Venus does

2:33

because it's moving between the earth and the sun.

2:36

So to do better than that, we really needed space

2:38

probes. And after all, that's what this episode is about,

2:40

to find out more about that and you'll hear later.

2:43

What a perfect setup, she asks Robert. We'll catch

2:45

up with you later in the show for some

2:47

more questions and this month's Stargazing Tips. So

2:50

if we turn to the history books, Mercury

2:52

is the messenger of the Roman gods zipping

2:54

around from place to place, which is how

2:56

the planet got its name. Mercury

2:59

certainly moves pretty quickly around the sun,

3:01

but it's an odd little planet and

3:03

it's over to our pal planetary scientist,

3:05

Dr. David Rothery from the Open University

3:08

to tell us more. Well,

3:10

Mercury is the smallest of the

3:12

planets, but it's bigger than the

3:14

moon. It's 2,400 and something kilometers

3:16

in radius. It's a

3:18

rocky body. It's the closest planet

3:20

to the sun and it's the most elliptical

3:24

orbit. At its closest,

3:26

it's 30% of the earth's sun distance

3:28

away from the sun and its furthest,

3:30

it's 40% of the earth's sun distance

3:32

away from the sun. So

3:34

it's quite an elongated orbit. The

3:36

surface is very hot by day, as

3:38

you would expect being that close to the

3:40

sun, 400 degrees Celsius

3:43

or thereabouts, but at night it

3:45

gets very cold because there's no

3:47

atmosphere. So it just radiates all

3:49

that heat away to space. So

3:51

big temperature extremes and

3:53

its day length is weird

3:55

because let's get this right.

3:58

It's day. twice as long

4:01

as its year. It rotates

4:03

three times for every two orbits

4:05

around the Sun and the combined

4:07

effect of that means sunrise to

4:09

sunrise takes two orbits of the

4:11

Sun to achieve. So it

4:13

has nights which are

4:16

88 Earth days in length so it's dark

4:18

for a long time which is why it's

4:20

able to get so cold at night because

4:23

there's a long time for all that daytime

4:25

heat to be radiated back to space. Yeah

4:28

we briefly covered mercury before as well

4:30

and we talk about it I think

4:33

someone described it as its

4:36

80% core so you know

4:38

we've got these huge temperature

4:40

changes it's a rocky body

4:42

so what's it like on that surface? Well

4:45

you're right Izzy it has a very

4:47

big core we think it lost most

4:49

of its rock in a giant impact

4:51

during its formation process so that strips

4:53

away most of the rock but there's

4:55

enough rock left to give it a

4:57

rock covering about 400 kilometres depth

5:00

on top of its big iron core and

5:03

that rock is surprisingly

5:05

interesting I'm a geologist and I'm great

5:08

at this it's

5:10

a really fascinating place for geology. You'd expect

5:12

the rock just to be some kind of

5:14

parched cinder but no it's not

5:17

it's got volatile elements

5:19

in considerable abundance. The

5:22

crust that we see today was largely

5:24

formed by volcanic eruptions of lava flows

5:27

stuff oozing out and flooding across the

5:29

surface layer after layer of lava flows

5:32

which have been intensely created by impact

5:34

but the most recent volcanism

5:37

has been explosive volcanism blasting holes

5:39

in the crust and

5:41

you don't get that unless the

5:44

rising molten rock the magma has

5:46

got volatiles in it that will turn

5:48

to gas or else maybe we're

5:51

encountering the volatiles as

5:53

the magma nears the surface maybe there's a

5:55

volatile rich layer just below the surface but

5:57

either way when

6:00

the magma is not confined by much

6:02

weight of overlying rock, the gas comes

6:04

out of solution and it goes bang

6:06

and it gets explosive eruptions. And that's

6:08

a wonderful history for a volcanologist like

6:10

me. And we've also got patches where

6:13

volatiles are escaping even today. It

6:15

looks moth-eaten in places. It's a

6:18

process that we call hollow formation.

6:20

These hollows are 10 meters, 20

6:22

meters deep and hundreds of meters

6:25

wide. They're flat bottom steep-sided depressions

6:27

where stuff is just dissipating away

6:29

to space. And we don't

6:31

know what's being lost. We know mercury is

6:33

rocky but in places it's so

6:36

rich in volatiles that the chemical bonds can

6:38

be broken and the atoms just drift

6:40

away to space leaving you these

6:43

strange flat bottom depressions in the

6:45

ground. It's weird. There's stuff going

6:47

on today that we didn't expect.

6:50

I love

6:52

hearing you talk about this. I

6:54

mean so when we talk about volatiles

6:56

those are those chemical elements, chemical compounds

6:58

that are vaporized

7:01

essentially. So what

7:03

chemical elements are they? What can

7:05

we know about the chemical composition

7:07

of mercury and then what impact

7:09

does that have for it as

7:11

a planet? We don't

7:13

know what all the volatiles are. We do

7:15

know that there's a lot

7:17

of sulfur on mercury, 2 to 4

7:20

percent sulfur wherever you look. That's a

7:22

result from NASA's messenger probe which orbited

7:24

mercury 2011 to

7:26

2015. It had an x-ray spectrometer

7:28

which could detect the sulfur. We

7:30

don't think it's sulfur as elemental

7:32

sulfur. It's in compounds. It's calcium,

7:35

magnesium, sulfide, something like that. As

7:37

well as sulfur we've got a

7:39

lot of sodium and potassium and

7:42

chlorine and we think probably

7:44

that what's being lost in

7:46

the volcanic explosions is

7:49

gases containing sulfur. It

7:52

could be carbon disulfide. It could be

7:54

hydrogen sulfide. I doubt that because we're

7:56

not expecting much hydrogen. It could be

7:58

it could be sulfur. oxide. We're

8:00

not sure, but gases containing sulfur,

8:02

because the deposits that we see

8:05

on the ground around these explosive

8:07

volcanic vents are deficient in

8:09

sulfur. So they've lost their sulfur, it's

8:11

been turned to vapor. Maybe

8:13

that was a vapor that was driving the explosion.

8:16

Where the hollows are forming, where we've

8:18

got passive, gradual,

8:21

non-explosive loss of material, and that's

8:23

got to be by breaking chemical

8:25

bonds, we don't understand and

8:27

we're going to understand the chemical composition

8:30

of mercury much better two

8:32

years from now, when we have

8:35

the European Space Agency's pro-Bepi Colombo

8:37

in orbit, with its British built

8:39

x-ray spectrometer called MIX, Mercury Imaging

8:42

X-ray Spectrometer. That will measure 20

8:44

or very about chemical

8:46

elements with spatial

8:49

resolutions as fine as about

8:51

10 kilometers. So we'll get very

8:53

detailed chemical mapping and then

8:55

we'll begin to understand what's being lost.

8:58

Mercury, obviously our planet is closest

9:00

to the Sun, can it protect

9:02

itself from the impact

9:04

of the Sun in any way? Well, Mercury

9:08

has a magnetic field. We've mentioned

9:10

its large core and the

9:12

outer part of that is molten and

9:14

generating a magnetic field. So it has

9:16

a magnetosphere and the solar wind streaming

9:18

out from the Sun, mostly protons, will

9:21

hit the magnetic

9:23

field and be deflected around the planet.

9:25

So the solar wind doesn't hit the

9:27

surface most of the time. Now, when

9:29

there's a solar storm, the

9:31

edge of a magnetic field or the magneto

9:34

pores, if we want to be technical, gets

9:36

pushed down to Mercury's surface. So those times

9:39

charged particles from the Sun do impinge

9:41

on the surface. So

9:43

if you think the aurora here is

9:46

pretty on Mercury, when

9:48

there's a big solar storm, you've got stuff

9:50

coming right down to the surface and

9:53

irradiating the ground. And that's another process

9:55

that could be responsible for forming Mercury's

9:57

hollows when the solar wind reaches the

9:59

ground. another way to break chemical

10:01

bonds. So it is

10:03

a very hostile environment. There's no

10:05

atmosphere really. There are atoms associated

10:08

with mercury but the

10:10

atmosphere is so diffuse that molecules are

10:12

more likely to drift off to space

10:14

or bounce back to the surface rather

10:16

than bumping into each other. So there's

10:18

no atmospheric pressure on mercury really. It's

10:20

just called an exosphere. Thank

10:23

you to David Brodery. So

10:25

Becky, what's mercury's density and

10:27

how do we know that?

10:30

So mercury's density is just a bit less than

10:32

Earth's. It's around about 98% of the density of

10:35

Earth at around about 5.4 grams

10:38

per centimeter cubed. It actually makes it the second

10:40

most dense planet in the solar system. The Earth

10:43

is the densest, right? And that's

10:45

actually really interesting, especially

10:47

if we think about it in comparison to

10:49

our moon. As Robert said, it looks very

10:51

similar to the moon. It's just a little

10:54

bit bigger than the moon as

10:56

well. And yet it is five times

10:58

more massive than the moon, which is

11:00

what makes it so dense, right?

11:02

And that's really interesting to think about like,

11:04

okay, why is it so dense? Then it's

11:06

got to have so much iron in its

11:09

core to make it that heavy and

11:11

that dense as well. Now, as

11:14

for how we know this, we

11:16

need two things, right? To work out density.

11:19

You need to work out the planet's like

11:21

diameter, its radius, its size across, and then

11:23

its mass, right? So the diameter we get

11:25

from knowing how far away it is from

11:27

us and its apparent size in the sky,

11:29

but mass is a little bit trickier to

11:32

work out. If planets have moons,

11:34

it's really easy because you can just get

11:36

it from how the moons orbit the planet

11:38

with the Kepler's laws. But

11:40

mercury doesn't have a

11:42

moon, so how do you do this? Really,

11:44

you've got to send a satellite to it

11:46

to get a really accurate measurement of this

11:48

to like measure essentially its gravitational pull on

11:51

the satellite and then you can work out, okay,

11:53

what's its mass, how heavy it is. And the

11:55

Mariner mission to Mercury actually did this back in

11:57

the 1970s and that's what then

12:00

led to the determination of its density and

12:02

it being so dense and this idea that

12:04

it must have this huge

12:06

iron core. We're talking like 85% of Mercury's got

12:08

to be made of iron to explain how heavy

12:11

it is and how dense it is. And so

12:13

then you start thinking, well, how did it get

12:15

so much iron? Like, is it because

12:18

there just happened to be that much

12:20

iron in that area of the solar system after

12:22

the sun formed, like heavier elements perhaps sank towards

12:24

the center? Or is it because

12:26

of another like giant impact between two planets that

12:28

occurred in the early solar system in the same

12:31

way that we think that our moon was formed

12:33

through a giant impact with another planet in the

12:35

earth in the early solar system? And

12:38

do we see planets like Mercury

12:40

in other solar systems or are

12:42

we special? Well,

12:46

we've seen super-Mercuries is what

12:48

people call it. Like you must have heard

12:51

this before, like we find super-Earths and like

12:53

super-Neptunes. We find super-Mercuries, right? They are a

12:56

very similar density, but they are bigger

12:58

than Mercury, right? There's no, as far

13:00

as I know it, there's no Mercury

13:02

analogues that have been found.

13:04

Now, even though we haven't found

13:06

them, I don't think that means that they don't

13:08

exist, right? I don't think that means that our

13:11

solar system is special because we've got a Mercury

13:13

kind of planet so close to the

13:15

sun. And I think that's because our ways

13:17

of finding planets are really

13:19

biased to more massive planets,

13:21

like Jupiter sized, that orbit

13:23

really close to their star

13:26

so that, you know, that their orbit, so, you

13:28

know, maybe once every month or once every few

13:30

days, which means that when we find planets through

13:32

the transit method, which is when like they pass

13:34

in front of their star and block some of

13:36

the star's light, that's a lot easier

13:38

if they do it more often so we can spot the

13:40

signal more often and if they're bigger because they block more

13:43

light. And then the other way that

13:45

we've got of finding planets is the tug that

13:47

they have on their star, right? They don't orbit

13:49

the star, the star's not static, the star and the planet

13:51

orbit each other so there's this like a center of mass

13:54

between them. So for example, Jupiter as it

13:56

orbits the sun pulls that center

13:58

of mass between them outside. of the surface

14:00

of the sun. So the sun orbits

14:02

that little point outside of its surface, it

14:04

wobbles around on the sky and we can

14:06

spot if there's planets like Jupiter in orbit

14:09

around stars because they wobble. Mercury

14:11

however, is not

14:13

gonna give you a wobble that's gonna be anywhere

14:15

near noticeable in terms of if you

14:17

have a similar planet around a star elsewhere in

14:19

the universe as well. Just because it is so

14:21

small, again it doesn't block a lot of light

14:23

either for a transit, so it's unlikely it will

14:25

find those as well. So I don't

14:28

think we're unique in the fact that we have

14:30

Mercurys. I think they must exist out there, it's

14:32

just that we haven't ever found any Mercury analogues.

14:34

There is some hope though with the habitable worlds

14:37

observatory that's, you know, NASA is in planning stages

14:39

for now, not gonna launch until like the 2040s,

14:41

but the idea is that you have a good

14:43

enough imager on board that you could image

14:47

at least Earth-like planets, probably

14:50

capture Venus as well, whether

14:52

you'd be able to get Mercury if it's

14:54

further away from its star maybe, but I

14:56

think that's a big big question. I think

14:58

the focus is more on Earth-like planets than

15:01

Mercury-like planets sadly. Okay, but

15:03

Mercury's orbit is an interesting one and

15:05

it helped to explain general relativity, so

15:07

can you explain that one? Yeah, yeah,

15:09

so I mean the best way to

15:11

describe what Mercury's orbits, I mean most

15:13

planets' orbits look like is, you know,

15:15

a spirograph. Do you remember spirograph from

15:18

when we were kids, right? The little

15:20

game where you put your pen in

15:22

a little cog and you'd like turn

15:24

it around in a circle. Yeah, so

15:26

basically, if you don't know what we're

15:28

talking about, essentially like you think

15:30

about a planet making a loop around its star

15:32

and just tracing that same path over and over

15:34

again, but actually once it's made the loop, it

15:36

doesn't really join up with where it

15:39

was before and it does another loop

15:41

of its orbit, sort of next, just next to where it

15:43

was before and you can see how that sort of spirals

15:45

out to make almost like a pattern, like a, like almost

15:47

like a petalism of flower, right? It's what it ends up

15:50

sort of looking like, right? And this

15:52

is like scientific term for this

15:54

is perihelion precession. Perihelion means like

15:56

closest point to us to the

15:58

sun in a planet. orbit,

16:00

essentially what it means is that that

16:02

point is moving around a circle, really,

16:04

is what's happening. It's where your pen

16:07

is in each paragraph. All

16:09

planets do this, process ever so slightly,

16:12

and that can be explained by Newton's laws of

16:14

gravity and Kepler's laws of motion and things like

16:16

that. But

16:18

for Mercury, the effect is

16:21

so pronounced, like it's so much bigger

16:23

than for the other planets because it's

16:25

so close into the sun and the

16:27

pull of the sun's gravity that

16:30

this is what gives it this bigger, more

16:32

pronounced effect when this happens. The Newton's laws

16:34

of gravity can't explain this. You

16:36

have to start considering all of the relativistic

16:38

effects that come from the fact that you're

16:40

in a stronger gravitational field because you're closer

16:42

to the sun, which is where Einstein's theory

16:44

of general relativity comes in, which explains gravity

16:47

in terms of relativistic effects. And

16:49

it was actually one of the very first proofs

16:51

of general relativity when Einstein was actually putting together

16:53

his new theory of gravity. It was like,

16:55

oh, well, here's this one problem that no one's

16:57

been able to explain for ages, you know, like

16:59

Mercury's orbit. Let's see if it fits. And it

17:01

does. It fits really, really well. We've

17:05

seen two missions travel to Mercury before.

17:08

We had NASA's Mariner 10 spacecraft in

17:10

the 70s, making the

17:12

journey for the very first time, and it

17:14

made three flybys. And then we

17:16

had NASA's messenger mission, which studied Mercury from 2011

17:18

to 2015. So what did they show us? And

17:20

what is

17:24

ESA's latest mission, Bepi Colombo,

17:26

aiming to find? It's

17:28

something that I asked Dr. Simon Lindsay

17:30

from the University of Leicester, who's the

17:32

instrument scientist of MIX, which is one

17:34

of the instruments on board of the

17:36

spacecraft. We knew almost nothing

17:39

about it before those missions went there.

17:41

So Mariner was able to find that it

17:43

had a magnetic field, which is very odd.

17:46

It's imaged about half of the surface. It

17:48

measured this temperature differential, but it was only

17:51

able to do so much. You've got these

17:53

three flybys. They each last a few hours,

17:55

and that was the whole of the mission.

17:57

Messenger is the source of basics. clear

18:00

everything we know now. So

18:02

it was orbiting more or less North to

18:04

South. It mapped the whole surface for the

18:06

first time. It measured the composition of the

18:08

surface. It mapped out the

18:11

magnetic field. It took all sorts

18:13

of altitude measurements that allowed us to build up

18:15

this topographic map of the planet and yeah, pretty

18:17

much everything else we know comes from that mission.

18:20

Yeah. And now we've got

18:22

Beppe Colombo, which launched in 2018. So

18:25

what was the aims of this mission? What

18:28

can you tell me about Beppe Colombo? So

18:31

Beppe Colombo has a few sort of USPs.

18:34

One of our unique points is there

18:36

are two spacecraft make up, well, two

18:38

science spacecraft that make up Beppe Colombo.

18:40

So we have European MPO, Mercury Planetary

18:42

Orbiter, which goes into a low orbit.

18:45

It's polar like messenger, maps

18:47

the surface. So it's got objectives to

18:49

do with the composition of the planet,

18:51

the formation of the planet. It also

18:53

maps its magnetic field at low altitude.

18:56

And then we have MIO, the magnetospheric

18:58

orbiter, which orbits further out from the

19:01

planet. That's there to map out the

19:03

magnetic environment, to look at the interaction

19:06

of the planet and the solar wind

19:08

to measure the planet's exosphere, all these

19:10

sorts of things. We are trying

19:13

to answer these sort of quite fundamental questions

19:16

about the planet. It's this weird, unusual

19:18

planet. It's the closest to the sun.

19:21

We call it an end member of the solar system. So

19:23

it's the smallest planet. It's the closest to

19:26

the sun. It's the extreme in quite a

19:28

lot of ways. And Beppe is

19:30

very much looking at what that means about

19:32

the formation of Mercury and its properties now

19:34

and what that means for the solar system

19:37

as a whole. And so what's on board?

19:39

How is it going to find out all of

19:41

this information? Because there is there's a lot packed

19:43

in there. Yes, yes,

19:45

absolutely. So there are

19:48

a lot of instruments, exactly

19:50

how many depends on how you define them. But there's

19:52

about 16. Okay. So

19:55

on MPO, the instruments are

19:57

kind of focused around the surface, but

19:59

not exclusively on

20:01

MPO. We have visible camera. We have

20:03

an infrared camera. We have

20:05

a suite of exospheric instrument. We have

20:08

a magnetometer. We have a gamma-ray spectrometer.

20:10

We have a X-ray

20:12

spectrometer, which I work on.

20:14

And I am sure I'm leaving someone

20:16

out, but that's the one I can remember. I mean, you've

20:18

done well to list as many as you have, to

20:20

be fair. Thank you. Thank you very much. And

20:24

then on MIO, like I say, they're

20:26

a little bit more focused on magnetospheric

20:28

stuff. So there's a magnetometer again, there's

20:31

a plasma wave instrument, and then there's

20:33

a large number of different particle instruments,

20:35

electrons, protons, and ions and

20:37

so forth, and measures how they move

20:39

around inside the environment of the system.

20:42

Yeah. And you work

20:44

on an instrument called MIX.

20:46

So what is that doing?

20:49

So MIX stands for

20:51

Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer.

20:53

Which is very confusing, because it's MIX with

20:55

an S. And I, when we first started, before

20:57

we started recording, I was like, can I

20:59

just check how we pronounce this? Absolutely, everyone

21:02

calls it MIXes the first time. So

21:05

you will only understand the name properly if you

21:07

speak Finnish. So we

21:10

are part of a

21:12

suite of two instruments. We're a pair

21:14

with another instrument called SIX, which is

21:17

Finnish, hence this whole thing. SIX stands

21:19

for Solar Intensity X-ray Spectrometer. And this

21:21

is a pun, if you know Finnish,

21:24

because MIX-y is Finnish for Y, SIX-y

21:26

is Finnish for because. I love that,

21:29

that's very good. We often

21:31

talk about this, like the way that

21:33

scientists and physicists name things, I

21:35

love a pun. Like the... We

21:37

are addicted to acronyms, really. Okay,

21:40

so what is MIX doing and how does

21:42

it work? Okay, so it's an X-ray spectrometer.

21:44

And what that means is it's measuring X-rays,

21:46

that's the obvious part. The reasoning

21:48

behind this is that X-rays are

21:51

continuously being put out by the sun.

21:54

Those X-rays get absorbed in any material you

21:56

put in the way. So in our

21:58

case, that's the surface of MIX. Mercury

22:01

has no atmosphere, so that means none of those

22:03

x-rays get absorbed on the way in. They get

22:05

absorbed in the surface of the planet. Atoms in

22:07

the surface gain energy from these

22:09

x-rays and electron gets promoted or ejected

22:12

from the atom, leaving a gap. And

22:15

then that gap is filled by an electron from a

22:17

higher shell in that atom.

22:19

And in the process it emits an x-ray

22:22

and that's the x-ray that we're measuring. And

22:24

the reason that this is interesting is that

22:26

the energy of that x-ray will

22:28

tell you what atom it came from.

22:31

So if you're able to measure that

22:33

energy you can say that came from

22:36

silicon, calcium, magnesium, whatever. So that's what

22:38

we do. We fly around connecting these

22:40

x-rays, tracing the vector where

22:42

they came from on the surface and saying

22:44

there is these elements in this location on

22:46

the surface. And that means that we can

22:48

build up a map of the composition at

22:50

the surface. I mean that

22:53

makes total sense. So where is

22:55

is Beppy now? It

22:57

is rapidly approaching Mercury right now. The

22:59

trajectory of the mission is very very

23:01

long. It launched in 2018 and it's

23:03

still a couple of years till it

23:05

gets there. This trajectory has

23:07

several flybys in it. So we flew

23:09

past Earth, we flew past Venus twice,

23:11

flew past Mercury three times so far

23:13

and then we will fly past again

23:16

on the 4th of September. That will

23:18

be the 4th of 6 flybys. So

23:20

we've got two more Mercury flybys to

23:22

go before we finally go into orbit.

23:24

I mean that sounds really exciting and

23:26

so we've got, you said a few

23:28

more years until Beppy actually

23:31

reaches Mercury. So is there anything a

23:33

bit more specific than that and then

23:35

what will it be getting started on?

23:37

So it gets started in 2026, a

23:40

science mission begins. We expect

23:42

it to last a year. We hope it

23:44

will last two years. We expect to be

23:46

cooked before too long. But

23:48

in that time we are really sort

23:50

of poised because we know we've

23:52

got this short mission and we've been waiting a

23:54

very long time to get that data down. So

23:56

we're very poised to spring into action as soon

23:58

as this data's set. starts coming down and make

24:01

the best fish we can with the data we

24:03

get back. Thank you to

24:05

Simon Lindsay from the University of Leicester. This

24:11

is the Supermassive podcast on the

24:13

Royal Astronomical Society with me, astrophysicist

24:16

Dr. Becky Snaath-Est and science journalist

24:18

Izzy Clark. This month is all

24:20

about mercury. So let's dive into

24:22

some listener questions. Becky at Kashiteed

24:24

on Instagram wants to know, and

24:27

I hope I've said that handled

24:29

correctly. They want to

24:31

know, why doesn't the gravity of the

24:33

sun and other planets cause mercury to

24:35

fall into the sun? Well, it's because

24:37

it's in orbit essentially. So it's moving

24:40

with enough speed in its orbit to

24:42

keep it there, despite the fact that the sun

24:44

is still pulling on it due to gravity. Like

24:47

I always like to think about, you know, when

24:49

we put things like satellites into orbit around earth,

24:51

right? We have to give them enough energy so

24:53

that we throw them so that they're almost making

24:55

this like perfect circle around the earth so that

24:57

like they're falling to earth, but they're always just

24:59

falling past it. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, it's

25:02

like a similar thing, right? For planets orbits as

25:04

well. If, if you were, you

25:06

know, wanting to actually cause mercury to fall

25:08

into the sun, which, you know, let's, let's,

25:10

let's go easy on the little guy. Let's

25:12

just say we were evil villains and we

25:15

had this power. Yeah. Yeah. And

25:17

we had some minions. Um, we would need

25:19

to like nudge with enough

25:21

energy to like, you know,

25:24

remove energy from, from mercury, like, or give it

25:26

some energy to change its orbit in some ways

25:28

you could do that with maybe like a, again,

25:30

like a collision between mercury and a massive object.

25:32

Like I don't know, an asteroid would have enough

25:34

energy to do this, but you know, another planet

25:36

maybe would give it enough energy to change its

25:38

orbit in some way. And as soon as you

25:40

change the orbit, you make it unstable. And that's

25:43

when then the pull of the sun's gravity might

25:45

start to win out and pull it

25:47

towards the sun. But for now it's just sort of falling

25:50

perfectly around the sun. So it never

25:52

falls into the sun. Okay. Thanks, Becky.

25:55

And Robert, iMUSIF sent an interesting

25:57

question about averages and they say.

25:59

on average, Mercury is the closest

26:01

planet to Earth. Do you find

26:04

it counterintuitive? So let's look into

26:06

this a little bit more. Is

26:08

that true? And can you explain

26:11

it? Yeah. So I'm music.

26:13

Yes, I definitely found it counterintuitive. And I

26:15

was thinking, so

26:18

I had to do a bit of sense checking and reading

26:20

around. And there was an article in Physics Today describing this

26:22

work, I think it was five or six years ago now.

26:25

And the crucial point is the average distance

26:27

between the planets. And what that's taking into

26:29

account using their method is the fact that

26:31

say Venus, although it gets closest to the,

26:33

closer to the Earth than any other planet

26:36

and then Mars and so on, spends

26:39

an awful lot of the time further away as

26:41

well and goes around the sun slowly. So when

26:43

you crunch the numbers, you find that on average

26:46

and only on average, Mercury is closer to the

26:48

Earth. So is it counterintuitive?

26:51

Definitely yes. Does it tell us a lot about the

26:53

layout of the solar system? Well, not to my mind,

26:55

because you know the order of the planets and the

26:57

sun is still the same or at least the order

26:59

of the planetary orbits. It just

27:01

says that sometimes, or a

27:03

lot of the time Mercury is closer to the Earth

27:05

than Venus, just because Venus happens to be on the

27:07

other side of the sun. So it's a curiosity more

27:09

than anything else. But yes, one I was glad to

27:11

find out about because I have a feeling somebody else

27:13

will ask me that having read the article as well.

27:16

I was going to say, do you not

27:18

remember when the animation of this hit the

27:21

internet like a few years back? And I

27:23

just remember saying this collective minds blow. Like,

27:25

yes, the internet is everyone's like, wait, what?

27:28

It's overturning everything we learned in primary school,

27:30

isn't it? Yeah, because we all think about

27:32

it again as static, like all lined up

27:34

and like... I had to deal with

27:36

Pluto being demoted from a planet and now there's this. What

27:39

else is coming? If you need five minutes, Robert,

27:42

we'll understand. Yeah, I'll take a moment. And

27:45

Becky, Elise asks, why isn't Mercury

27:47

the hottest planet in the solar

27:49

system despite it being the closest

27:51

to the sun? Yeah,

27:53

great question, Elise. I think it just shows

27:56

how important atmospheres are

27:58

for Pluto. holding

28:00

on to heat, right? Because

28:04

Mercury barely has an atmosphere,

28:06

Venus, incredibly thick atmosphere. So Mercury, what

28:08

happens is radiation from the sun just

28:11

hits the surface of Mercury and bounces straight

28:13

back off again and is lost to space,

28:16

right? That heat is not held onto, it

28:18

is just lost to space, right? So you

28:21

can sort of instantaneously heat the surface where you

28:23

are in sunlight in that sort of way when

28:25

you know sort of like

28:27

it could be a cooler winter day and the

28:30

air could be cold, but if you feel the

28:32

sun on your face, it feels warm because you

28:34

have the energy hitting into you. It's that kind

28:36

of a sort of heat that Mercury has. And

28:39

that's cause like I said, Mercury's atmosphere is

28:41

so thin. The actual only atmosphere that Mercury

28:44

has is stuff from the surface that's bounced

28:46

up off the surface as radiation from the

28:48

sun hits into it, right? So

28:50

it's almost like little bits of like rock

28:52

and stuff that is the atmosphere. It's so

28:55

incredibly, incredibly thin. It's a hundred trillion times

28:57

thinner than Earth's atmosphere. Yeah.

28:59

It's just crazy to think about, right? Right,

29:02

yeah. Whereas Venus's atmosphere is 93 times

29:04

thicker than Earth's. Right?

29:09

So all that gas in Venus's atmosphere can

29:11

absorb all that reflected light that's come back

29:13

off the surface. Right? And so

29:15

it can store it there in the atmosphere. So the

29:17

atmosphere warms up and that's what makes Venus the hottest

29:19

planet compared to Mercury because it has

29:21

both that incident sort of heat that's on it

29:24

but also the atmosphere to keep it warm

29:26

too. And Elise, I would recommend that you listen

29:28

to our Venus episode as well. Yeah. Yeah.

29:32

Robert, we've also had a question about

29:34

life on Mercury from Fiona and she

29:36

asks, what's the likelihood

29:38

of life being found on Mercury with

29:40

the knowledge from Earth life? Well,

29:44

Fiona, I think sadly it's really quite close

29:46

to zero. And the reason is, look, it's

29:48

the things we've been talking about, Becky was

29:50

just mentioning, no atmosphere does not help, you

29:52

know, huge variations in

29:54

temperature as a result. So incredibly hot

29:57

and also incredibly cold in different places.

30:00

of liquid water, which is seen as

30:02

not necessarily an absolute prerequisite for

30:04

life, but certainly helpful. And

30:06

you know, never say never, maybe, but if there

30:09

was life there, it would have to be hiding

30:11

in some very much more benign environment under the

30:13

surface that we don't think we're really aware of

30:15

exists at all. So it seems really unlikely. I

30:18

guess, you know, thinking about this, could you

30:20

have something that some very specialized bacteria or

30:22

something perhaps, but it's, to my man, it's

30:25

very difficult to see how they'd get started

30:27

in the first place. You know, I could

30:29

imagine somebody doing some genetic engineering on earth

30:31

and making something that could live under the

30:33

surface of mercury, but it seems very unlikely

30:35

ever arose there, at least to me, happy to

30:37

be contradicted by an astrobiologist. But I think it's

30:40

a long shot. Or Robert, don't forget what Jeff

30:42

Goldblum taught us from last episode as well. Yes.

30:45

Life finds a way. Exactly. From

30:47

Jurassic Park. Channel Jurassic Park. Yeah.

30:50

I guess you've got to think about like,

30:52

you know, we've shown that the tardy graze,

30:54

the little, what people call them water beds,

30:56

those little things, they've survived on the outside

30:58

of the International Space Station. So clearly, like,

31:01

you know, no atmosphere and high radiation intense

31:03

environments, certain types of life can

31:05

obviously survive it. But like you say, it's

31:07

the trigger to get it started. Yeah. Yeah.

31:10

Like that's the weird thing. I think we

31:12

could probably like contaminate Mercury surface and see

31:14

if life survived, but I probably wouldn't get

31:16

that past the ethics board. Yeah, exactly.

31:18

I really hope that doesn't happen.

31:20

Exactly. Yeah. It's evolution, you know,

31:22

just like, yes, starting point is

31:25

life evolves to these extreme environments, but it

31:27

must be a struggle to get started. Yeah.

31:30

Okay. So thank you

31:32

to everyone who sent in questions. And

31:34

if you want to send in any

31:37

questions for a future episode, then you

31:39

can email podcast at ras.ac.uk or find

31:41

us on Instagram at supermassivepod. Feel free

31:44

to slide into the DMs on that

31:46

one. So shall we finish with

31:48

some stargazing? Robert, what can we see in

31:50

the night Skyless Month? Yeah, quite a lot

31:52

as it happens. The nights are drawing in equinoxes

31:54

on the 22nd of September. So

31:57

for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, you know, moving into the

31:59

autumn and winter.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features