Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome back. Today we're revisiting
0:02
the Enigma that is Romantic
0:04
Relationships and with us to continue
0:06
that conversation is Mary
0:08
Morgan. Mary Morgan is
0:11
a psychoanalyst and couples
0:13
therapist. She's a fellow
0:15
of the British Psychoanalytical
0:17
Society. Until recently, Mary
0:19
was the reader in
0:21
couples psychoanalytic psychotherapy at
0:23
the Tavistock Relationship Center.
0:25
She has written extensively in the
0:28
field of psychoanalysis and teaches
0:30
and supervises internationally. She
0:32
is the author of a couple's date
0:34
of mind, psychoanalysis of couples, and she has
0:36
two upcoming books, Couple Relations
0:38
and Introduction and Love, its
0:41
meaning and exploration in couples
0:43
therapy. Today we discussed what drew
0:45
her to working with couples in therapy.
0:47
Some of the common problems people run
0:49
into in their everyday lives in
0:51
their relationships, problems, problems with communication.
0:54
Red flags, a relationship is in
0:56
trouble, green flags that couples therapy
0:58
seems to be working, some of
1:00
the more modern problems in dating
1:02
and relationships, particularly more recent cultural
1:05
trends in the West, such as
1:07
that of non-monogamy and how that
1:09
might be impacting modern couples. We
1:11
discuss a little bit how relationship
1:13
therapy works, some of the key
1:16
lessons Mary's learnt in her career,
1:18
some key relationship myths she'd like
1:20
to bust, and much more. This is
1:22
the Thinking Mind podcast. A
1:24
podcast all about psychiatry, psychotherapy,
1:27
psychology and self-development. If you like
1:29
it, do leave a review, give us a
1:31
rating, share with a friend. Or if you
1:33
want to support the podcast further, check out
1:35
some of the links in the description. Thanks
1:37
for listening and here's today's
1:39
conversation with Mary Morgan. Thank
1:52
you so much for spending some time
1:54
with me today. Pleasure, Alex. Thank
1:56
you for asking me. As the audience
1:58
will know, I practice. individual
2:01
therapy. I've always been fascinated
2:03
by couples therapy and I'm so
2:05
curious what do you work with
2:08
individuals and couples and what drew
2:10
you to specialize in couples therapy.
2:12
I do work with individuals as
2:14
well as couples because I'm trained
2:17
as a psychoanalyst but actually I
2:19
trained as a couple therapist first
2:21
to have a stock relationships. That
2:24
came out of practicing as a
2:26
social worker to start with. working
2:28
in family centers where we're encountering
2:31
couples whose children were at risk and
2:33
we try to get the whole family
2:36
in to work with them and I
2:38
tended to specialising working
2:40
with the parental couple. What do
2:42
you think attracted you to
2:44
couples therapy? What drew you
2:46
to that specialisation? That's such
2:49
a good question. I don't really know
2:51
the answer to that. I mean I
2:53
do think that relationships are central. It's
2:55
kind of, you know... They're at the
2:58
centre of the family, aren't they? Whatever
3:00
kind of family one has, you know,
3:02
the couple are central to that in
3:04
a way. It's kind of what makes
3:06
the world go around. It's more than
3:08
about a kind of couple relationships, I
3:10
think, that attracted me. And it's really
3:12
about kind of relating, you know, a
3:15
capacity to relate to another person. So
3:17
it might not be in a
3:19
couple relationship, but with friends, colleagues,
3:21
families, and things can break down,
3:23
can't they, in all those different
3:25
arenas, arenas, arenas. It's striking
3:27
how much the quality of
3:29
our relationship or our most central
3:31
relationships determine the quality of our
3:33
lives. Indeed, everything can be kind
3:36
of going well for us financially,
3:38
career-wise. We can have a roof
3:40
of our heads, and yet if
3:43
there's something wrong with our major
3:45
relationships, it's so striking how much
3:47
that affects us perhaps more than
3:49
we even might predict. that it would
3:51
and I suppose this is something that you
3:53
see in your work commonly. I do and
3:56
I think you know by pushing it that
3:58
way you're touching on something quite important. Alex
4:00
which is about the sort of
4:02
containing function of a relationship for
4:04
individuals that you know that if
4:07
you're in a relationship which develops
4:09
over time bills over time it
4:11
becomes a sort of a resource
4:13
for the individuals within it they
4:16
feel they've got something sort of
4:18
around them that can have a
4:20
containing function and that can help
4:22
the individuals in all sorts of
4:25
ways. What are the most common
4:27
problems? you find that people that
4:29
couples present to therapy with. The
4:31
kind of ordinary problems that couples
4:34
bring are things like problems in
4:36
communication and time together because they
4:38
don't have enough time or they
4:40
feel so tired when it gets
4:43
to the evening, you know, once
4:45
they finished working, put the children
4:47
to bad and sit down, they
4:49
just feel that there's no kind
4:52
of space when they fall. communicating.
4:54
The problem with that is that
4:56
then in order to sort of
4:58
relax, instead of talking together, people
5:00
kind of turn to their phones
5:03
or their computers, a lot of
5:05
couples complain that their partners got
5:07
more of a relationship with their
5:09
phone than with them. And so
5:12
I think that's one of the
5:14
big things is sort of, you
5:16
know, not having time or not
5:18
making time to talk. People don't
5:21
tend to view their relationships as
5:23
something that needs maintenance. Like most
5:25
people, most things people prize, like
5:27
if someone has a car they
5:30
really love or their home or
5:32
their career, there's a recognition that
5:34
in order for those things to
5:36
continue to be satisfying, they need
5:39
some kind of regular input and
5:41
regular maintenance. Whereas what seems, I'm
5:43
curious on your take on your
5:45
take on this, but with couples.
5:48
You have this period of falling
5:50
in love like the six months
5:52
to let's say two years of
5:54
falling in love where all the
5:57
positive feelings. seem to come really
5:59
automatically and then slowly, the investment
6:01
comes really automatically and then slowly
6:03
but surely many couples with time
6:05
because they don't take this maintenance
6:08
approach, they fall into the strap
6:10
of feeling like, okay, the relationship
6:12
is less satisfying, unconsciously, feeling like
6:14
it should be satisfying automatically like
6:17
a commodity as opposed to an
6:19
investment. Is there something that you've
6:21
encountered? Absolutely, and there's so much
6:23
in what you're saying actually Alex.
6:26
Yes, a relationship definitely needs to
6:28
be taken care of and to
6:30
be, you know, maintained and repaired
6:32
along the way. The trouble is,
6:35
I think, that quite a lot
6:37
of couples don't think of themselves
6:39
as having a relationship in that
6:41
sense. They tend to think of,
6:44
it's me in relation to you,
6:46
and if you sort of... did
6:48
this or didn't do this, then
6:50
that would make me happy kind
6:53
of thing. They don't kind of
6:55
think in terms of what they're
6:57
creating between them, and there's a
6:59
kind of entity, a third entity
7:02
if you like, their relationship, which,
7:04
you know, does need taken care
7:06
of. And as you say, sort
7:08
of at the beginning, couples don't
7:10
really need to think about this
7:13
too much because there's, you know,
7:15
what... I call the kind of
7:17
in-love stage where everything seems to
7:19
be working, sex is great and
7:22
there aren't too many kind of
7:24
problems but that does change over
7:26
time. And then for many couples
7:28
I suppose at that point they
7:31
do become aware of there's this
7:33
relationship and we need to take
7:35
care of it but for others
7:37
they might feel everything's gone wrong.
7:40
We're not feeling the same way
7:42
anymore. What's wrong with our relationship?
7:44
There's nothing wrong with it actually
7:46
but... It changes. Right, like the
7:49
relationship doesn't feel good anymore, therefore
7:51
something is wrong with the relationship
7:53
and I suppose many people seem
7:55
to come to the conclusion of,
7:58
oh I've just picked their own
8:00
person. and end up just dating
8:02
serially and never really getting into
8:04
a sustained relationship. I don't know
8:07
whether the relationship, whether they might
8:09
feel the relationships gone wrong, they
8:11
might feel that, but something sort
8:13
of changes in that they start
8:16
to perceive each other less idealistically
8:18
and more realistically. So you sort
8:20
of get closer to who the
8:22
real other person is, and that
8:24
can be difficult. I think it
8:27
was George Elliot who said that
8:29
marriage is awful in the nearness
8:31
that it brings. And there's something
8:33
about, you know, being close with
8:36
another person that brings you up
8:38
against the difficult things about them
8:40
as well as the things that,
8:42
you know, you've had enough with.
8:45
You know, at that point, you
8:47
know, 18 months to two years
8:49
or whatever, something starts to change
8:51
that has to be dealt with.
8:54
Yeah, and I suppose it also
8:56
brings you close to the things
8:58
that might not be so great
9:00
about yourself with your partner then
9:03
reflects back at you. Exactly, so
9:05
it's also, you know, your nearness
9:07
to them, you know, they see
9:09
these sort of aspects of yourself
9:12
and that can be difficult. Do
9:14
you think there's any truth to
9:16
the idea, like in pop psychology
9:18
circles on Instagram and places like
9:21
that, you'll often find these harsh
9:23
truths like... you might attract or
9:25
fall in love with or get
9:27
into a relationship with precisely the
9:29
kind of person that might reactivate
9:32
some of your more difficult early
9:34
life experiences. I suppose this is
9:36
what Freud would have called the
9:38
repetition compulsion. In your experience, is
9:41
there truth to this or is
9:43
it a bit more of a
9:45
simplistic aphorism which we shouldn't necessarily
9:47
take too seriously? I think there
9:50
is truth to it. I mean,
9:52
one of the things that, you
9:54
know, part of the kind of
9:56
theory, really, it's I kind of
9:59
take theory about couple interaction is
10:01
that the adult couple relationship is
10:03
an opportunity to rework. difficulties from
10:05
earlier relationships. So perhaps in the
10:08
primary relationship with the mother or
10:10
the whoever the parent is or
10:12
you know things that have gone
10:14
wrong in the sort of early
10:17
childhood might be brought into this
10:19
current relationship and they might either
10:21
be repeated in the way that
10:23
Freud was talking about. So for
10:26
example somebody might get together with
10:28
someone who rejects them. all the
10:30
time and because they were rejected
10:32
earlier and they just keep repeating
10:34
that experience so there's no real
10:37
development. But alternatively they might find
10:39
that they could they get into
10:41
a relationship where some of these
10:43
early difficulties could be worked through.
10:46
Maybe there's an expectation of being
10:48
rejected but actually they find with
10:50
their current sort of partner then
10:52
they're not rejected and then they
10:55
can sort of... change their internal
10:57
kind of preconceptions. Or, you know,
10:59
maybe they sort of had a
11:01
sort of angry parent and they
11:04
do kind of get together with
11:06
someone else who's angry, but maybe
11:08
the person that they get together
11:10
with manages their anger in a
11:13
constructive way, not a destructive way.
11:15
So it means that something can
11:17
change for that individual. In other
11:19
words, there is potentially something therapeutic
11:22
about an adult couple relationship. we
11:24
can kind of grow within them,
11:26
you know, potentially. That's good to
11:28
know, because it feels like there's
11:31
so much in the culture, and
11:33
I don't know if you've observed
11:35
this, but there seems to be
11:37
so much in the culture and
11:39
common like TV shows and films
11:42
that are really downplaying the importance
11:44
of potential value of and really
11:46
the optimism of a long-term monogamous
11:48
relationship. And I don't know if
11:51
this is just a response to...
11:53
sort of mid-20th century norms, which
11:55
went on questioned for a long
11:57
time and now we're seeing kind
12:00
of a culture. backlash, but there
12:02
seems to be a real pessimism
12:04
about long-term monogamous relationships at the
12:06
moment. I think that's true, but
12:09
I do think there are many
12:11
long-term monogamous relationships that thrive, but
12:13
I think you're right that there
12:15
are also those kinds of relationships
12:18
are being questioned, particularly by young
12:20
people, and you know, young people
12:22
I think are experimenting much more,
12:24
especially in... Western cultures, not in
12:27
all cultures of course. You know,
12:29
they're thinking about their sexual identity,
12:31
gender, what kind of relationship they
12:33
want to be in. And, you
12:36
know, some of them are rejecting
12:38
heteronormativity and monogamy, no, and choosing
12:40
other ways or trying other ways.
12:42
And of course, you know, to
12:44
couple therapists, this is... It's very
12:47
interesting, it's also quite challenging because
12:49
then one has to think about
12:51
what is a couple, you know?
12:53
And it's not, you know, this
12:56
straightforward thing that it might have
12:58
been 50 years ago. What do
13:00
you think is like a really
13:02
good, what's a good working definition
13:05
of a couple or relationship? And
13:07
I suppose this is probably something
13:09
you've covered in your book, a
13:11
couple state of mind, but what
13:14
do you think is a good
13:16
definition of like a healthy couple
13:18
or healthy relationship people can use?
13:20
I think that one of the
13:23
things that couples struggle with is
13:25
managing the other's separateness and difference
13:27
because although, you know, when you
13:29
form a couple there's a kind
13:32
of intimate bond and people come
13:34
together through shared values and things
13:36
they both identify with. They also,
13:38
particularly after this time, you were
13:41
talking about off the sort of,
13:43
could be six months for 18
13:45
months or two years, they discover...
13:47
you know, the other's difference and
13:49
otherness from them. And that's really
13:52
challenging. But if you can manage
13:54
that, if you can sort of
13:56
accept, then everybody thinks like me
13:58
and there's things about... you that
14:01
I don't like maybe understand or
14:03
get, but you're different from me.
14:05
If you can manage that, then
14:07
something more creative can happen between
14:10
the two people. You know couples,
14:12
particularly once they have children, kind
14:14
of get into the state of
14:16
mind where they feel it's really
14:19
important that we're on the same
14:21
page, you know, but they can't
14:23
always be on the same page,
14:25
you know, and when one parent
14:28
sees the other one, really not
14:30
managing with a little child. they
14:32
feel they can't do anything because
14:34
they've got to be on the
14:37
same page, whereas in fact what
14:39
would be most helpful would be
14:41
if the other parent could say,
14:43
look, can I help or should
14:46
we try doing this differently or,
14:48
you know, I think this might
14:50
be a better idea. That's a
14:52
more kind of creative couple relating,
14:54
but obviously some, you know, it's
14:57
difficult too. So I guess by
14:59
being on the same page in
15:01
this context, you're meaning... you do
15:03
things the way I think that
15:06
they should be done, which I
15:08
think is probably the better way
15:10
than you think they should be
15:12
done. So there's kind of a
15:15
enforcement of one partner's values on
15:17
the other, and you could see
15:19
how that could be quite oppressive,
15:21
oppressive, problem solving, something like that.
15:24
Yeah, that's a good way of
15:26
putting it. Yeah, definitely. And I
15:28
suppose so much of this is
15:30
about communication. Communication seems like a
15:33
sort of light, airy, fairy kind
15:35
of topic, and yet it's so
15:37
important. I personally believe it's so
15:39
easy to get communication wrong, even
15:42
with high amounts of training, and
15:44
of course most people get zero
15:46
training in communication. And I don't
15:48
think about this just in terms
15:51
of intimate relationships, but also friendships
15:53
and... again, work relationships. Where do
15:55
you think people tend to go
15:57
wrong in their communication? You'll rise
15:59
of course that communication can sound
16:02
like as a... fairy, fairy, you
16:04
know, a lovely thing that's kind
16:06
of communicated. But actually it is
16:08
quite difficult, you know, it's quite
16:11
difficult to properly listen to another
16:13
person. I mean I think one
16:15
of the efficacious things about all
16:17
forms of psychotherapy is that experience
16:20
of being properly listened to by
16:22
somebody. But in relationships we're not
16:24
always very good at that. And
16:26
it can be, I think for
16:29
couples quite hard... really listening to
16:31
the other one if if one
16:33
doesn't feel listen to oneself. So
16:35
kind of why should I listen
16:38
to you because you're not really
16:40
hearing me, but also, of course,
16:42
we get into this area that
16:44
we've just been talking about, about
16:47
finding, you know, by listening to
16:49
another, you're getting to know the
16:51
other as another, you know, with
16:53
different views, different ideas about things
16:56
that might either kind of... put
16:58
you in conflict or you might
17:00
feel that they sort of annihilate
17:02
your own ideas. You know, if
17:04
I take on your ideas, then
17:07
what about mine? As if there's
17:09
not enough room for two separate
17:11
ideas. But, you know, again, I
17:13
think, you know, where that is
17:16
possible and sometimes couples need help
17:18
with this, then that could lead
17:20
something really creative. Something I think
17:22
about, like a very big tension,
17:25
I find... an individual therapy is
17:27
the kind of striking the balance
17:29
between acceptance and sort of striving
17:31
for growth as it were. And
17:34
this is really hard even an
17:36
individual therapy like to what extent
17:38
should an individual in therapy dealing
17:40
with certain problems, to what extent
17:43
should they lean towards accepting themselves,
17:45
to what extent should they sort
17:47
of be challenging themselves to try
17:49
and actualize their potential. And I
17:52
think this becomes even more complicated
17:54
in couples, because I can see,
17:56
you know, one partner. encouraging another
17:58
to grow and reach their potential
18:01
to be a good thing. I
18:03
can imagine a version of that
18:05
that's more, again, imposing. Similarly, acceptance,
18:07
you know, one partner accepting the
18:09
other generally sounds like a really
18:12
good thing. And yet, there's a
18:14
sense of acceptance that can also
18:16
be a little bit stagnating. It's
18:18
the dark side of acceptance. How
18:21
do you manage these sorts of
18:23
tensions? in couples' work. I can
18:25
imagine some relationship therapists being like,
18:27
oh, it's all about the acceptance,
18:30
like one partner should just accept
18:32
the other. I can imagine a
18:34
different therapist thinking, no, it's, you
18:36
know, the couples should, to the
18:39
best of their abilities, be encouraging
18:41
each other to improve in some
18:43
way. And I can imagine a
18:45
balance of both. Where do you
18:48
sit with this? Does this tension
18:50
arise for you and your work?
18:52
It does arise, but I think
18:54
what's important here, and I do.
18:57
This is kind of the central
18:59
theme of my book, The Couple
19:01
State of Mind, is that the
19:03
couple therapist's position is trying to
19:06
understand the relationship. And therefore, you
19:08
know, how I would understand what
19:10
you've just described is that in
19:12
the couple relationship there is a
19:14
tension between defensiveness, if you like,
19:17
and development, you know, and one
19:19
partner is taking the more sort
19:21
of defensive position of... no change
19:23
that's except how we are or
19:26
I am and the other one
19:28
is pushing for some development but
19:30
they're both kind of involved in
19:32
it and that's the that's the
19:35
struggle in the relationship. So it's
19:37
so typically one partner will take
19:39
the more like let's change things
19:41
position and one will say that's
19:44
more like keep things as the
19:46
opposition that's what you find. Yes.
19:48
I mean, one of the important
19:50
theories, I think, of in couple
19:53
psychoanalysis or psychotherapy is the idea
19:55
of a couple projective system, meaning
19:57
that each partner is projecting spit-off
19:59
part. of themselves into the other.
20:02
So it might be that one
20:04
partner in a way could carry
20:06
the more developmental aspects for each
20:08
of them. And it is actually
20:11
important to both of them, but
20:13
the other one is kind of
20:15
putting the brakes on for
20:17
both of them. And it's
20:19
something they're sort of involved
20:21
in together. Yeah, and I think that's
20:24
like, I think what you're saying is
20:26
true because it's all about the dynamic,
20:28
like you can imagine one individual
20:31
in relation to this, this to one person,
20:33
they might be the super challenging one.
20:35
If they left that relationship and
20:38
entered the relationship with someone who
20:40
is even more challenging than them,
20:42
then they might be the one
20:44
taking the more accepting position. Like
20:46
I've often found this really striking
20:49
how, you know, so much of our
20:51
personality. that's so much of our
20:53
emphasized personalities relative to who we happen
20:55
to be relating to in any one
20:58
time like I might often find in
21:00
relation to one person oh I'm this
21:02
the more the charismatic side comes out
21:04
in relation to a different person
21:06
small the submissive side so I guess
21:09
this is kind of what we're hinting
21:11
at with this it is but
21:13
I think you know when we
21:15
think about unconscious partner choice which
21:17
is very related to a couple
21:20
projected system it might be that
21:22
unconsciously each partner chooses the other
21:24
because they're more comfortable with disowned
21:26
aspects of the self. So I
21:29
might choose to get together with
21:31
someone who perhaps does push things
21:33
forward in a way that I
21:35
really want to be able to do, but
21:37
I feel too anxious about it. So I'm
21:40
going to, you know, benefit from them
21:42
doing that for us, but I might
21:44
also try and hold them back a
21:46
bit as well because of my own
21:48
anxieties. Yeah, so I think it is all fair about
21:51
a sort of projector system, but
21:53
what's interesting about what you're saying,
21:55
Alex, is that, you know, you feel
21:57
like that can, those kind of mini
21:59
systems. can change depending on what
22:01
relationship you're in with different friends
22:03
and colleagues and so on? I
22:06
think so because it makes, I
22:08
like to think about things from
22:10
an evolutionary perspective as well and
22:12
so you start to think about
22:14
things in this context quite pragmatically
22:17
and about like what would be
22:19
adaptive and what's not and I
22:21
think what's really adaptive about human
22:23
beings is our ability to collaborate
22:25
and work as a team. That
22:28
being the case, I think in
22:30
any team you find yourself in,
22:32
it makes sense to emphasize certain
22:34
traits and de-emphasize others. So if
22:36
you're, for example, you know, trapped
22:38
on a desert island with someone
22:41
who's like very, very agentic, it
22:43
kind of makes sense for them
22:45
to handle the agenticness and the
22:47
decision-making and because they have that
22:49
covered. and you might be able
22:52
to handle other aspects and so
22:54
on and so forth with any
22:56
personality trait you can think of.
22:58
So I think human rating has
23:00
this weird way of like, okay,
23:03
let's bring out, you know, Alex
23:05
can cover this aspect of what
23:07
needs to be done. Mary can
23:09
cover this aspect and together, you
23:11
know, they kind of form a
23:13
whole. And then it can shift
23:16
quite fluidly depending on who happens
23:18
to be making up the team,
23:20
if you know what I mean.
23:22
That is an example of a
23:24
relationship working really well, isn't it?
23:27
And also, the very last thing
23:29
that you said, that maybe it
23:31
might need to change for some
23:33
reason, and can the couple kind
23:35
of swap positions if necessary? You
23:38
know, maybe there'd been some sort
23:40
of crisis of some kind with
23:42
children or work or health or
23:44
something, and what was the way
23:46
the couple were functioning before with
23:49
each, you know, Alex carrying this
23:51
and Mary carrying this? might need
23:53
to be reconfigured to deal with
23:55
that current situation. And if the
23:57
couple can do that, that would
23:59
also be a signer think of
24:02
a healthy relationship, that kind of
24:04
like... Yeah, just like a sign
24:06
of individual psychological health is that
24:08
person being able to think more
24:10
flexibly. A sign of relationship health
24:13
is a relationship being able to
24:15
be flexible and accommodate the different
24:17
disasters, as we know, disasters and
24:19
crises unfold all the time. I
24:21
mean, I'm curious, like, what are
24:24
some signs? you know that people
24:26
might be able to pick up
24:28
on in their everyday lives that
24:30
like actually this relationship does need
24:32
some working on maybe something like
24:35
entering into the realm of couples
24:37
therapy would be useful are there
24:39
any sort of obvious red flags
24:41
perhaps a good one to talk
24:43
about is about arguing because you
24:45
know there's different kinds of arguing
24:48
aren't there and some I mean
24:50
if a couple don't argue ever
24:52
that's a problem I think that's
24:54
a red flag but they can
24:56
argue have quite robust arguments and
24:59
they can feel productive and they
25:01
lead to change in the couple
25:03
and you know different behaviors and
25:05
progress in the relationship if you
25:07
like. But there are the couples
25:10
that report arguing more like kind
25:12
of bickering that goes on and
25:14
on and on it's repetitive and
25:16
it doesn't get anywhere. And I
25:18
think those couples often need help
25:20
to understand what's going on. often
25:23
I think behind or underneath the
25:25
bickering and it's not so conscious
25:27
that's why they might need to
25:29
come and get help is hate
25:31
you know some kind of hateful
25:34
feeling a normal kind of hatred
25:36
actually but that's gone sort of
25:38
underground I mean a good example
25:40
of this I think is is
25:42
when when a couple have young
25:45
children have children and say it's
25:47
a heterosexual couple and the husband
25:49
feels excluded from the mother and
25:51
the baby and all of a
25:53
sudden, you know, our relationship has
25:56
gone and now you're enough with
25:58
the baby. and what about me,
26:00
you know. But of course the
26:02
husband can't really express that because
26:04
it's not a really rational feeling,
26:06
it's not even, you know, he
26:09
feels I can't really say that,
26:11
that's the most unhelpful thing to
26:13
say, and also, you know, he
26:15
loves the baby too. So these
26:17
feelings get kind of pushed away,
26:20
but then the couple get a
26:22
bit sort of isolated from each
26:24
other, probably sex stops when there's
26:26
young children, and... and then when
26:28
the children are a bit older
26:31
and there's a bit more space
26:33
and maybe they start school that
26:35
sort of age five or something
26:37
the couple realize we're not having
26:39
we're not having sex anymore that
26:41
we don't even feel like it
26:44
anymore and and I think this
26:46
kind of thing the bickering and
26:48
sometimes this other problem of no
26:50
sex which I sort of morphed
26:52
into is to do with sort
26:55
of unresolved hatred that's sort of
26:57
gone underground. Resentments. Resentments, yes, exactly,
26:59
which haven't been sort of talked
27:01
about or worked through, but then
27:03
have a sort of insidious effect
27:06
on the relationship, which could be
27:08
something like bickering, it could be
27:10
loss of sexual desire, it could
27:12
be other things, but it doesn't
27:14
make any sense to the couple,
27:17
you know, because they're saying we
27:19
don't want to be doing this
27:21
bickering, it's just kind of ruining
27:23
our relationship, or... we both want
27:25
to have get back to having
27:27
sex like we do when we
27:30
got together but neither us wants
27:32
to you know they're sort of
27:34
difficulties that that feel kind of
27:36
beyond their control in a way
27:38
and again I guess they're unconsciously
27:41
thinking the sex the romance the
27:43
attraction the fun if you like
27:45
should be automatic because it was
27:47
automatic in the beginning so why
27:49
isn't it automatic now yeah exactly
27:52
it and that's That's partly because
27:54
I think in kind of Western
27:56
cultures we're up against this sort
27:58
of the romantic ideal you know
28:00
of a relationship and it's sort
28:02
of there in all the media
28:05
isn't it and the things that
28:07
you can read and everything as
28:09
if this how our relationship should
28:11
be for sort of that that
28:13
fun and feeling in love should
28:16
carry on forever and so people
28:18
might judge themselves against this kind
28:20
of ideal. So do you think
28:22
people are often shooting for this
28:24
ideal therefore shooting for like an
28:27
unrealistic target? Yes, but it can
28:29
sound a bit depressing, can't it?
28:31
The sort of, you know, the
28:33
loss of the romantic ideal, that
28:35
kind of disillusionment. You know, what
28:38
I would say is that if
28:40
that can be managed, then it
28:42
often leads to a kind of
28:44
deeper kind of love. And that
28:46
deeper love isn't a kind of
28:48
boring love. You know, it can
28:51
have fun and enjoyment and romantic
28:53
elements to it, but it's not
28:55
defined by the romantic ideal. Yes.
28:57
How new is this romantic idea?
28:59
How recent is this? And I
29:02
think it's always a good moment
29:04
when people find out, oh romance
29:06
isn't that old actually? You kind
29:08
of think unconsciously romance is as
29:10
old as self, but as a
29:13
cultural thing, it's relatively new. How
29:15
recent is it? It is fairly
29:17
new. I think we tend to
29:19
think this is what it's been
29:21
like, you know, forever, or we
29:23
can do. But actually it wasn't
29:26
like that. So probably a hundred
29:28
years ago, even, that people... you
29:30
know married for or were married
29:32
off for particular reasons love wasn't
29:34
seen as the main as particularly
29:37
important it was more to do
29:39
with security and other factors that
29:41
came into it but it's certainly
29:43
very present now isn't it? Very
29:45
present I think very quite can
29:48
be quite damaging because if you
29:50
think that's what you're shooting for
29:52
which is basically what I mean
29:54
is effortless romantic love that's kind
29:56
of automatic in the way that
29:59
it is when you just start
30:01
dating. Again, not something you have
30:03
to continually invest in, not something
30:05
that's ever unpleasant, then it's totally
30:07
unrealistic. and you're doomed to feel
30:09
like every relationship is either a
30:12
failure or going to be a
30:14
failure at some point. In a
30:16
way, I feel quite, I've read
30:18
like a lot of, I've read
30:20
and watched a lot of anecdotal
30:23
stories of people in other cultures
30:25
who actually do end up together
30:27
via things like arranged marriage or
30:29
marriage at a very young age
30:31
after not a lot of time
30:34
dating. It's quite striking how much,
30:36
you know, often those couples will
30:38
report, this is an anecdote, but
30:40
we report quite high rates of
30:42
satisfaction in their marriage, and to
30:44
the Western mind, that's so counterintuitive,
30:47
because we think like, how can
30:49
it be, you know, we prioritize
30:51
choice, freedom, the ability to choose
30:53
one person out of, you know,
30:55
a pool of potential eligible bastards,
30:58
how could it be that, you
31:00
know, your parents deciding for you
31:02
is a good idea and it
31:04
just goes to show that our
31:06
intuitions aren't necessarily aligned on how
31:09
to on how best to find
31:11
like a long-term good part there
31:13
and often the roots to that
31:15
can be quite can be a
31:17
lot more mysterious than we think.
31:20
I think that's right and you
31:22
know what listening to you talk
31:24
Alex it just sort of reminds
31:26
me of how many different conceptualizations
31:28
of love there is you know
31:30
we tend to think of it
31:33
think of it. within our own
31:35
kind of cultural framework, don't we?
31:37
But there are many different cultural
31:39
frameworks. And when I was talking
31:41
to you and I was telling
31:44
you about a book that hopefully
31:46
will come out later this year
31:48
on love. It's called Love, its
31:50
meaning and expiration in couple therapy.
31:52
And we were very interested in
31:55
the different experiences couples have of
31:57
love and different meanings meanings and
31:59
different meanings. and diverse meanings, actually.
32:01
Thinking about arranged marriages, for example,
32:03
I think... that there can be
32:05
a very different idea of sort
32:08
of what love is and a
32:10
sense of in some arranged marriages,
32:12
say within particular religious communities, there
32:14
is a feeling of doing this
32:16
for the community. You know, we're
32:19
kind of, it's not just the
32:21
two of us, we're forming this
32:23
bond as part of a bigger
32:25
thing, really, that involves more than
32:27
us. joining together the two families.
32:30
Joining together the two families, you
32:32
know, trusting in the judgment of
32:34
the of the parents and the
32:36
people that have have sort of
32:38
arranged the marriage and and then
32:41
there is a sort of quite
32:43
a commitment to making that relationship
32:45
work because it's quite difficult if
32:47
it doesn't work. There is a
32:49
kind of signing up to we're
32:51
going to kind of make this
32:54
work now. That might be hard
32:56
to kind of conceive of, but
32:58
from the kind of romantic sort
33:00
of idea, but actually, I think
33:02
it's true that some of those
33:05
relationships can work very well, that
33:07
they start in a different way,
33:09
and they've got a different idea
33:11
about the meaning of love, actually.
33:13
Yeah, and I guess it's partly
33:16
a bit alienating to the Western
33:18
mind, because we think of it
33:20
as contrived, and we don't like
33:22
to think of our... life choices
33:24
ours as contrived in the West.
33:26
I feel like in modern times,
33:29
unconsciously, we want everything to be
33:31
like our choice and organically fulfilling.
33:33
And I think this could be
33:35
a problem once people are in
33:37
a relationship and they're trying to
33:40
improve it. I think they often
33:42
feel the things that they need
33:44
to do to improve it are
33:46
too contrived. So like going to
33:48
couples therapy, it's too artificial. or
33:51
even some of the things a
33:53
couples therapist might recommend. I'm curious
33:55
if you would recommend things like
33:57
scheduling date nights for instance is
33:59
something I've seen relationship coaches. recommend
34:02
like, you know, code and offer
34:04
period of time in your calendar
34:06
where the purpose is for the
34:08
two people to communicate or be
34:10
romantic or some combination. And that
34:12
to a lot of people feels
34:15
like, oh, if I feel I
34:17
have to do something on purpose,
34:19
then it's not real somehow. And
34:21
yet, those practices seem to work.
34:23
Is that the kind of thing
34:26
you recommend or and similarly do
34:28
you find this opposition to this,
34:30
this, this artificiality of some of
34:32
these interventions? I don't know because
34:34
I don't work in that way,
34:37
you know, because there's a psychoanalytic
34:39
couple, there's different kinds of couple
34:41
therapists, perhaps we should say, and
34:43
some are perhaps more behavioral and
34:45
offering exercises to do or things
34:47
to the couple to try out,
34:50
but a psychoanalytic couple therapist wouldn't
34:52
be doing it in that kind
34:54
of way. They might be interested
34:56
in why the couple don't have
34:58
any time together and what's... what
35:01
does that mean and what's going
35:03
on sort of more unconsciously? So
35:05
there's different approaches but the other
35:07
thing that I was thinking as
35:09
you spoke was about couple therapists
35:12
feeling, sorry couples feeling, you know,
35:14
they don't necessarily want someone else
35:16
involved in their kind of private
35:18
couple relationship and the idea of
35:20
coming from for couple therapy to
35:23
talk about your kind of private
35:25
relationship with someone else might feel
35:27
very difficult. And I think that
35:29
is an issue and I think
35:31
that does put couples off coming
35:33
for help. And as a couple
35:36
therapist I think you have to
35:38
find a sort of the right
35:40
distance with a couple. You can't
35:42
be too removed from them, but
35:44
also you don't want to intrude
35:47
into their relationship. So that's something
35:49
to kind of learn and find
35:51
out with each couple really where
35:53
they feel comfortable to allow the
35:55
therapist into their relationship. Because you
35:58
see, you're an individual therapist, aren't
36:00
you, Alex? Yeah, so the problem
36:02
with couple therapy is that you
36:04
don't know what the partner's going
36:06
to talk about. And if you
36:08
want them to talk about that
36:11
now or ever, you know, with
36:13
the therapist, so it can feel
36:15
very sort of exposing actually coming
36:17
as a couple and shaming as
36:19
well and sort of all sorts
36:22
of difficult feelings can be stirred
36:24
up. bringing your relationship therapy. I'm
36:26
really curious from the outside looking
36:28
in it. It looks so challenging.
36:30
Individual therapy is challenging. Copper's therapy
36:33
looks incredibly challenging. What do you
36:35
find most tricky about it? Good
36:37
question. I mean I think that's
36:39
that that's sort of that I
36:41
think what I've just described as
36:44
one of the difficulties is kind
36:46
of getting that relate the position
36:48
of the therapist in the right
36:50
place so it's neat it's you're
36:52
close enough to the couple but
36:54
not too intrusive but then on
36:57
the other hand I say that
36:59
and I think this can move
37:01
around a bit in a session
37:03
and over sessions and you know
37:05
I think the therapist usually can
37:08
judge that I think the most
37:10
difficult situations probably are couples that
37:12
don't listen to each other talk
37:14
over each other where there's quite,
37:16
there's various forms of what I
37:19
would call narcissistic forms of relating
37:21
where one partner sort of rather
37:23
takes over the other. Sometimes there's
37:25
a kind of particular narcissistic fit
37:27
where there's somebody who's more kind
37:29
of narcissically self-assured and the other
37:32
partner has quite a poor developed
37:34
sense of south. that sort of
37:36
self-assuredness in the narcissistic partner might
37:38
have drawn the other one to
37:40
them and at the beginning of
37:43
the relationship they might have really
37:45
relied on the other thought the
37:47
other one knows more than them
37:49
they're the one that sort of
37:51
has a better grasp on what
37:54
a relationship is but then the
37:56
other partner who's got a poor
37:58
sense of self starts to develop
38:00
maybe they have individual therapy and
38:03
they want to sort of be themselves
38:05
in the relationship and the other
38:07
one kind of can't bear it
38:09
because the other ones kind of being
38:12
more separate from them feel such
38:14
a threat. So these are very
38:16
difficult couples actually to work
38:18
with and of course the therapist
38:20
also has a separate state
38:23
of mind. So anything that the
38:25
therapist says that doesn't sort
38:27
of accord with... with the
38:29
more narcissistic partner, if
38:31
you like, can also feel threatening.
38:34
So this can be quite a
38:36
difficult situation to work with,
38:38
I think. And then what are
38:40
the, what are like the green
38:43
flags in couples therapy? How do
38:45
you know things are starting to
38:47
go well? Okay, so that's a nice
38:49
question. That's a really nice question.
38:51
I think, and you know, I...
38:54
I think this is where the
38:56
development of a couple state of
38:58
mind is so important
39:00
because to start with it's the
39:02
it's the approach the couple
39:04
therapist takes over couple
39:06
therapist is focusing even though
39:08
the couple therapist might work
39:10
with each individual all the
39:13
time she's trying to use
39:15
that to understand what's happening
39:17
between the couple. Then over
39:19
time if the therapy's going well.
39:22
the couple start to internalize a
39:24
couple's state of mind into their
39:26
relationship. And so they come to the
39:28
next session and they say, oh, we
39:31
had this terrible row on Friday night.
39:33
But then Saturday morning, we had
39:35
a conversation where I said to my
39:37
partner, you know, I think when I said that
39:40
thing to you, that stirred up that thing
39:42
that always does up in you and then
39:44
you did that thing to me. And we
39:46
got going on this thing that we do
39:49
in our relationship that we do in our
39:51
relationship. That's music to my ears
39:53
because I realize that they're starting
39:55
to develop that capacity for reflection
39:57
as another way of putting it.
40:00
to be able to reflect on what
40:02
happens in their relationship.
40:04
And of course, this becomes
40:06
a really important resource in
40:08
a couple's relationship, because
40:11
even when things break down between
40:13
them, things go wrong, they have
40:15
horrible arguments, or stop talking to
40:18
each other, they know that there
40:20
is a capacity somewhere in their
40:22
relationship that they can find
40:24
where they're able to process
40:27
this together. And when this
40:29
starts to happen, I think the couple,
40:31
it's a green flag for the therapist
40:33
because she can start to think, okay,
40:35
at some point, I can remove myself from
40:38
this relationship. They don't need me
40:40
anymore because they've got it, you know,
40:42
they've got what I represented
40:44
inside their relationship. So it's
40:46
kind of the beginning of the
40:49
end, you might carry on for
40:51
another six months together or whatever,
40:53
consolidating that kind of experience. So
40:55
they're able to internalize... the
40:57
ability to think not just about
41:00
themselves, but about the state of
41:02
a relation of the relationship
41:04
as a separate entity, the
41:07
common patterns they're falling into,
41:09
and how those patterns are
41:11
like surreptitiously blocking them from
41:13
getting their needs met. Yeah,
41:15
great summary, Alex, yeah. You
41:18
mentioned non-monogamy earlier or
41:20
polyamery. This is obviously
41:22
becoming more popular nowadays.
41:24
I'm not a psychoanalyst. If I
41:26
had to put on my
41:29
most cynical psychoanalytic hat, I
41:31
might think, oh, non-monogamy, could this
41:33
be kind of a defense
41:35
against perhaps the fears or
41:38
the pressures of a monogamous
41:40
relationship? What do you think this
41:42
is ever the case? What are
41:44
your views on non-monogamy? Yeah, I
41:46
mean, you're right. These are kind of
41:49
contemporary issues. I think open
41:51
relationships. tended to be
41:54
more in with male
41:56
same-sex relationships, but now
41:58
heterosexual couples also. opening
42:00
up their relationships. And I think
42:02
for different reasons, actually, sometimes the
42:05
couple themselves might say, look, there's
42:07
something problematic in our relationship. Sex
42:09
has become boring or something. Let's
42:12
see if, you know, having sex
42:14
outside the relationship might enliven our
42:16
couple relationship. So it's... that those
42:19
couples themselves might kind of say,
42:21
it's not exactly defensive, but it
42:23
might be a solution to a
42:26
difficulty that they have. Of course,
42:28
it can all go badly wrong.
42:31
I think this is the problem,
42:33
that there can be usually an
42:35
open relationships, as I understand them,
42:38
and I'm not an expert, but
42:40
there's usually that the couple work
42:42
out some sort of rules about
42:45
how they're going to have those
42:47
relationships. One of them tends to
42:49
be that there shouldn't be, there
42:52
should be emotional fidelity. So, you
42:54
know, neither partner should get sort
42:56
of emotionally involved with anybody else.
42:59
It's more a sexual encounter. But
43:01
of course, sometimes they do get
43:04
emotionally involved. And that's when it
43:06
can be really difficult, particularly if
43:08
they fear. Yeah, how is it
43:11
possible to control such a thing
43:13
from happening? I don't think it
43:15
is, but I think people try
43:18
to do that. You know, but
43:20
I suppose at that point the
43:22
couple might decide, look, this is
43:25
not working for us or something.
43:27
You know, so maybe this is
43:29
not an answer. You know, so
43:32
it's not like they always have
43:34
to have an open relationship. They
43:37
might decide, we'll try it and
43:39
see if it helps us, works
43:41
for us. enhances our relationship but
43:44
if it doesn't. But of course
43:46
sometimes there are these really difficult
43:48
situations where somebody is very emotionally
43:51
attached to somebody else and and
43:53
then it's a kind of crisis
43:55
really for the primary couple. Yes
43:58
and I think as with any
44:00
behavior I would hesitate to make
44:02
a blank statement, you know, they
44:05
want to pursue this behavior because
44:07
fill in the blank. I think
44:10
it really depends on what position
44:12
they're coming from. I can imagine
44:14
some people going towards non-monogamy more
44:17
as a defense. I can imagine
44:19
other people just being more dispositionally
44:21
predisposed to something like non-monogamy and
44:24
everything in between. So I suppose
44:26
it depends on like what is
44:28
like what is the reason you're
44:31
going for it. Are there any
44:33
fears you're running away from or
44:35
is it more a positive thing
44:38
that you're moving towards and what
44:40
is your like relationship to that
44:43
behaviour? Exactly. It can be many
44:45
things, not just that something's gone
44:47
wrong. It could be, you know,
44:50
a rejection of, you know, heteronormative
44:52
relationships or just the idea of
44:54
monogamy for heterosexual couples. You know,
44:57
more about not wanting to be
44:59
constricted by particular forms of... relating
45:01
and you know it can take
45:04
many different forms really and work
45:06
for some couples and not for
45:08
others. Polyamery I think is it's
45:11
often kind of put together with
45:13
open relationships but I think it
45:16
is quite a different sort of
45:18
phenomena actually and you know is
45:20
sometimes about sexual relationships, sometimes not,
45:23
sometimes it is more about emotional.
45:25
relationships. So what's the main distinction
45:27
between polyamery and open relationships? I
45:30
think in open relationships there's a
45:32
kind of a central couple who
45:34
are choosing as a couple usually,
45:37
it has to be really, to
45:39
open their relationship for various reasons.
45:41
In polyamery there might be a
45:44
central couple, you know, but there
45:46
might not be. There might be
45:49
several couples. There might be several
45:51
couples sort of living together or
45:53
living apart or there might be
45:56
an individual who has relationships with
45:58
many people who... never meet. It
46:00
can take many forms. I think
46:03
it's something that's kind of becoming
46:05
more, how did somebody put it?
46:07
It's becoming, you know, more of
46:10
a phenomena. You know, it's still
46:12
working out on what it is,
46:14
but it's not becoming sort of
46:17
more describeable in a way. It's
46:19
becoming more undescribable, really. And I
46:22
suppose this kind of a rejection
46:24
against like clear definitions in some
46:26
sense or certainly a rejection of...
46:29
Maybe the notion of like sacrifice
46:31
or the notion of like delayed
46:34
gratification or self-restriction that is you
46:36
know has been typical of marriage
46:38
across history It's like we don't
46:40
want to have prescribed norms It's
46:42
rejection of that prescribed norms perhaps.
46:45
That's right. Yeah, so I think
46:47
in that way it sort of
46:49
resonates more with queer theory which
46:51
you know without going into that
46:54
in detail, but which kind of
46:56
rejects all these kind of constraints,
46:58
I think, on forms of relating,
47:00
sexual relating. Yeah, the problem with
47:02
that is, again, this is a
47:05
problem of the West, is we
47:07
idealize freedom and we reject constraints
47:09
without realizing that, A, we can't
47:11
really reject constraints, we can reject
47:13
some constraints. and some social constraints.
47:16
But there are many, like, there
47:18
are fundamental realities of our existence
47:20
that are constraining. Sorry if I'm
47:22
getting a bit self-indulgently philosophical. So
47:25
there's some constraints that like just
47:27
part of being alive. And two,
47:29
or B, we need constraints way
47:31
more than we think we do.
47:33
Again, in the West, we shirk
47:36
them. Okay, we just don't need
47:38
these constraints. Wouldn't life be better
47:40
if in the blank? But actually...
47:42
Like many animals, we need constraints
47:44
to keep us like a bit
47:47
sane and a bit healthy. And
47:49
there seems to be something almost
47:51
perverse about the amount of freedom
47:53
we have. I don't mean just
47:56
like... I mean, even non-sexually perverse,
47:58
that the amount of freedom and
48:00
choice that we have seems to
48:02
be making us less and less
48:04
happy. I think that's probably right,
48:07
and I think there's an off,
48:09
you know, whatever, obviously some people
48:11
in polyamorous relationships really sort of
48:13
feel that that's what they want
48:15
and benefit from, but there's all
48:18
sorts of difficulties as well. For
48:20
example, sometimes they're hierarchical relationships, and
48:22
some people have more power in
48:24
the polyamery than other people do.
48:27
There's also, as I understand it,
48:29
you know, jealousy is really frowned
48:31
upon and that's the idea that
48:33
you should kind of have joy
48:35
in other people's, your partner's, pleasure.
48:38
But of course, what happens to
48:40
jealousy? You know, from a psychoanalytic
48:42
point of view, what does one
48:44
do with those feelings really? You
48:46
can't just... Magic them away? Have
48:49
them, no, exactly. And I think
48:51
the thing that we haven't sort
48:53
of perhaps touched on is children,
48:55
you know, who are the couple
48:58
in the... children and the parents,
49:00
you know, in this situation. Again,
49:02
I think, you know, many polyamorous
49:04
would argue that this can be
49:06
managed. Well, maybe it can, maybe
49:09
sometimes it's quite confusing, though, for
49:11
children. And certainly for couple therapists,
49:13
it's sort of, you know, it's
49:15
hard to kind of get one's
49:17
head around sort of who the
49:20
couple is. really, you know, and
49:22
it might be a problem of
49:24
who you're working with. Someone told
49:26
me that, you know, they were
49:29
expecting to see a couple once
49:31
and four people turned up on
49:33
the doorstep, you know. So it's,
49:35
it's challenging. Yeah, I think one
49:37
thing that's inevitable is that if
49:40
the more people involved in the
49:42
relationship, the more complex it is
49:44
and the more prone. to instability
49:46
it is. And that's not like
49:48
a moral judgment. I think that's
49:51
pretty straightforwardly factual that the more
49:53
the more the more people's like
49:55
two is more complicated than one,
49:57
three is more complicated than two,
50:00
and then that instability if there
50:02
are children involved is likely to
50:04
affect them, doesn't mean that children
50:06
can't be raised healthily in a
50:08
polyamorous situation, but it does mean
50:11
in all likelihood that it's going
50:13
to be a little bit more
50:15
complicated. Are there any kind of
50:17
big relationship myths that you'd like
50:19
to bust? Are there any... you
50:22
know, people commonly will give their
50:24
two cents about relationships in everyday
50:26
life. Are there any common misconceptions
50:28
which you're dying to contradict? I
50:31
think that's one of the important
50:33
ones and we have touched on
50:35
this is that relationships aren't just
50:37
about love. They're also about hate,
50:39
you know, that we have we
50:42
have the full range of feelings
50:44
really that come into the intimate
50:46
couple relationship. And somehow or other
50:48
we have to make room for
50:50
those feelings too. Doesn't mean, you
50:53
know, a disaster or a catastrophe
50:55
for the relationship. If there's something
50:57
about your partner you really don't
50:59
like or something they did that
51:02
you hated, it doesn't mean that,
51:04
but it's part of it really.
51:06
So perhaps I am saying this
51:08
is, you know, very different from
51:10
a kind of romantic. ideal. The
51:13
other thing is that, and I
51:15
think this is another difficult thing
51:17
about relationships, is that we can
51:19
ever kind of remain the same
51:21
as who we were once we're
51:24
in a relationship, because I think
51:26
by having that sort of closeness
51:28
with another and allowing the other
51:30
to affect us, we were changed
51:33
and that's... challenging but it's also
51:35
a kind of developing thing. So
51:37
it's people change over time, being
51:39
close to someone who is different
51:41
and separate from us and really
51:44
kind of taking them. on board
51:46
challenges the self and means that
51:48
we can't kind of go back
51:50
to where we were before we
51:53
were in that relationship. I think
51:55
some couples, some people want to,
51:57
they kind of feel, you know,
51:59
they want to. And I imagine
52:01
as you're saying that my reaction
52:04
is, I bet some people kind
52:06
of allow themselves to be changed
52:08
too much and some people are
52:10
too resistant to being changed at
52:12
all. Does that resonate to your
52:15
experience? Yes, when I was talking
52:17
about that sort of, you know,
52:19
that kind of narcissistic kind of
52:21
coupling, where one partner is very
52:24
kind of certain and doesn't seize,
52:26
you know, they don't need to
52:28
change at all. And the other
52:30
one is too permeable to change,
52:32
you know, too unable to hold
52:35
a boundary around themselves. I think,
52:37
you know, that can be a
52:39
real difficulty, I think. So there
52:41
can be that imbalance and maybe
52:43
the work would be... you know,
52:46
can the more narcissistic person allow
52:48
themselves to be changed and change
52:50
their worldview and maybe make some
52:52
more compromise and can the other
52:55
partner develop themselves, assert themselves a
52:57
bit more clearly develop their own
52:59
sort of value system, what they
53:01
care about and establish more kind
53:03
of equilibrium in that way. Yes,
53:06
exactly. But they might need help
53:08
to do that because I think...
53:10
What we're talking about can feel
53:12
quite threatening, you know, to both
53:14
partners, you know, or the partner
53:17
who is developing might feel quite
53:19
sort of fearful about how this
53:21
is going to go down with
53:23
the other one and the narcissistic
53:26
partner. I know we're using kind
53:28
of terms here, but let's say
53:30
the more kind of self-assured partner
53:32
can start to feel very threatened
53:34
by the developing separateness of the
53:37
other partner. Right. To someone in
53:39
that position. separateness and boundaries feels
53:41
very threatening to their sense of
53:43
self and then they can. overreact
53:45
with anger and so on. Yeah.
53:48
What does sound like the biggest
53:50
epiphanies you've had about relationships sort
53:52
of across your career as a
53:54
couple's therapist? What are some things
53:57
that really surprised you about all
53:59
of this? Obviously, you know, working
54:01
with couples for as long as
54:03
I have, it sort of challenges
54:05
your idea about there being any
54:08
one kind of couple, if you
54:10
like, you know, I come across...
54:12
you know, very different ways of
54:14
coupling and different ways of kind
54:16
of, you know, feeling happy as
54:19
a couple, even though I think
54:21
that there are some elements that
54:23
are really important for all couples.
54:25
And, you know, it's really important,
54:28
I think, that we don't, as
54:30
couple therapists, sort of, that we're,
54:32
sort of, don't in any way,
54:34
kind of impose our own beliefs
54:36
about what a couple is on
54:39
a couple. Even though couples actually
54:41
sometimes come asking for that, you
54:43
know, consciously or unconsciously, they're saying,
54:45
tell us what it is to
54:47
be a couple, how a couple's
54:50
supposed to be. But I think
54:52
our job is to try and
54:54
help them discover the kind of
54:56
couple they want to be, and
54:59
you know, and to be less
55:01
driven by unconscious factors that are
55:03
directing the relationship in ways that
55:05
are causing them unhappiness. Yeah, I
55:07
always felt like what really distinguished
55:10
psychoanesis was psychoanesis was never going
55:12
to tell you how to be
55:14
psychoanalysis job. And please correct me
55:16
if you think I'm wrong about
55:18
this is to develop and refine
55:21
your self-awareness the different layers to
55:23
your personality and what makes you
55:25
you, again, how early life experience
55:27
may have affected that. and therefore
55:30
by reducing unconsciousness allow you to
55:32
make some choices and then your
55:34
choices would be what they are
55:36
but at least they're coming from
55:38
a position of self-awareness rather than
55:41
and how most people operate, which
55:43
is kind of a default to
55:45
unconsciousness, a more reflexive action, if
55:47
you like. Absolutely, you know, and
55:49
in a way that kind of
55:52
sums up, you know, what couples
55:54
are often struggling with, they're kind
55:56
of coming, they might not be
55:58
saying this directly, but they're kind
56:01
of saying, look, this isn't the
56:03
kind of couple we want to
56:05
be, this is not the relationship
56:07
we want to have, but for
56:09
some reason we can't stop kind
56:12
of behaving in this way towards
56:14
each other and making each other
56:16
unhappy. And that's the job of
56:18
a psychoanalytically trained couple therapist really
56:20
is to try and help or
56:23
to try and understand and help
56:25
the couple to understand what's going
56:27
on at an unconscious level, what's
56:29
driving them to do with things
56:32
in their past to relate in
56:34
particular kinds of ways. So in
56:36
the midst of a session, if
56:38
one of the clients in the
56:40
couple... express something, you know, and
56:43
maybe you see they're expressing it.
56:45
You can see what they're trying
56:47
to express, but see that it's
56:49
being expressed in a not so
56:51
helpful way. Is it part of
56:54
your job to kind of interpret
56:56
that, almost try and translate it
56:58
in a way that is a
57:00
bit more helpful, that the other
57:03
partner can receive it? Is that
57:05
something that might be involved in
57:07
a couple session? Yes, but I
57:09
think that I might try and
57:11
do it both ways round. This
57:14
is what I think you're trying
57:16
to say you're trying to say.
57:18
but this is the way I
57:20
think the other partner this is
57:22
how you're you're hearing it and
57:25
this is kind of one of
57:27
the things that's going wrong between
57:29
you you know a kind of
57:31
miscommunication really so you're identifying the
57:34
pattern of miscommunication yes between them
57:36
yeah interesting and and the last
57:38
question I want to ask you
57:40
and this might be a bit
57:42
controversial and you may not wish
57:45
to answer it which should be
57:47
fine is when you when you're
57:49
working with couples Are there ever
57:51
signs, you know, that actually I
57:53
don't think this relationship has a
57:56
high likelihood of succeeding? and actually
57:58
do you ever come to the
58:00
conclusion with the people you work
58:02
with that maybe the best course
58:05
of action is for this relationship
58:07
to end actually? Yeah, and it's
58:09
a good question and I'm happy
58:11
to answer it. It doesn't happen
58:13
that often that I would make
58:16
that kind of decision. Couples do
58:18
break up, but that often they
58:20
decide to break up, but there
58:22
have been a few occasions where
58:24
I feel the relationship is so
58:27
destructive and particularly... if I feel
58:29
the children of that relationship are
58:31
suffering, that I might help them
58:33
to separate, and particularly if I
58:36
feel it's not getting anywhere the
58:38
therapy, which might be because there
58:40
is just a really difficult fit
58:42
between the couple, that what they're
58:44
bringing unconsciously to the relationship is
58:47
just stirring up the other one
58:49
too much and they can't kind
58:51
of get out of it even
58:53
without, you know, a lot of...
58:55
help. So occasionally I think yeah
58:58
that the couple actually might need
59:00
help from the therapist to to
59:02
separate you know. And then maybe
59:04
maybe conversely like what are some
59:07
of the transformations you've seen in
59:09
your work how like how couples
59:11
have been able to turn it
59:13
around. I think this is what's
59:15
so amazing about doing couple work
59:18
actually. I feel it is such
59:20
a privilege for a couple to
59:22
allow you kind of into their
59:24
relationship or close to their relationship,
59:26
however they would see it. And
59:29
the fact that so much change
59:31
and development is possible, in fact,
59:33
even couples who feel very stark,
59:35
can change. And it's very rewarding
59:38
to be part of that process.
59:40
So yeah. Well, Mary Morgan, thank
59:42
you so much for spending some
59:44
time with me. It's been wonderful
59:46
to be able to learn more
59:49
about this and would be happy
59:51
to have you back on at
59:53
some point in the future. Okay,
59:55
thank you very much Alex, thanks.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More