Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Time is precious and so are our
0:02
pets. So time with our pets
0:04
is extra precious. That's why we started Dutch. Dutch
0:06
provides 24 -7 access to licensed vets
0:09
with unlimited virtual visits and follow -ups for
0:11
up to five pets. You can message
0:13
a vet at any time and schedule
0:15
a video visit the same day. Our
0:17
vets can even prescribe medication for
0:20
many ailments and shipping is always free.
0:23
With Dutch you'll get more time with your pets and
0:25
year -round peace of mind when it comes to their
0:27
vet care. Welcome
0:31
to The Truth with Lisa Booth. Today
0:33
we've got Attorney General Ken Paxton on
0:35
the show. He just announced a primary
0:37
run against John Cornyn for Senate, so
0:39
of course I'm gonna ask him about that.
0:41
Why did he decide to run? What
0:44
are his chances? We'll dig into
0:46
that. Also, I don't know if you saw,
0:48
but the New York Times is now coining a
0:50
new phrase for the left, dark
0:52
woke. Sounds stupid, probably
0:54
because it is. What
0:56
does it mean? What do you need to know about it?
0:59
Also, was Biden's border crisis
1:01
just a deliberate ploy to flood the
1:03
country with new voters and also
1:05
to skew the census in electoral college
1:07
votes? We'll dig in with
1:09
Ken Paxton. And why
1:11
are Democrats just doubling down on
1:13
men and women's sports? We know
1:15
it's a 20 % issue for them. So
1:18
why double down? So
1:20
from these political power grabs to
1:22
these cultural controversies, we're going
1:24
to dig into all of it and get the truth
1:26
with Attorney General Ken Paxton. Stay tuned.
1:34
Well, Attorney General Ken Paxton, it's
1:36
great to have you on the
1:39
show. I appreciate you making the time.
1:42
Hey, glad to be back and you have a
1:44
great show and I'm glad to be on it.
1:46
I appreciate it. So I wanted to start out. I
1:48
don't know if you saw. So Democrats
1:50
are like desperately trying to figure out
1:52
their footing. as we've seen, and there's
1:54
this New York Times article. We talked about it
1:56
on Outnumber today, which I just thought it was really
1:58
funny. I don't know if you saw this, and
2:00
they're calling it the dark woke. And
2:03
the New York Times quote says,
2:05
what is dark woke? Democrats are
2:07
trying out a new attitude. It's
2:09
provocative, edgy, and perilously towing the
2:11
line of not being too offensive.
2:13
But it just underscores this journey
2:15
that the Democratic Party has been
2:17
on. Why do you think they're
2:19
struggling so hard to find their
2:21
footing? Because this wokeness that they
2:23
promoted doesn't work. People don't benefit
2:25
from it. They don't get it.
2:27
They see that the results of
2:30
it are bad for America and
2:32
it's bad for them, bad for
2:34
their families, bad for their kids.
2:36
There's no upside to it. It's
2:38
just liberal policy that that harms
2:40
people, that doesn't provide benefits, and
2:42
people have figured it out. So
2:44
they're struggling to find a new
2:46
message and a new narrative. I
2:48
have this conversation with Paul Morrow,
2:50
who I'm sure you're familiar with
2:52
from Fox. And we're talking about
2:54
with all these judges trying to
2:56
block President Trump from following through
2:58
with this promise of mass deportations.
3:01
And if you really think about it, it's
3:03
kind of genius from the left to
3:05
have allowed millions of illegal aliens into the
3:07
country because I think they knew that
3:09
it would be difficult to try to deport
3:11
them. You know, you look
3:13
at the immigration court, there's a backlog
3:15
over over 3 .6 million people already. Even
3:18
for non asylum cases, the
3:20
proceedings can take a couple of
3:22
years. Will we ever
3:24
be able to get rid of some
3:26
of these people? Look, I first
3:28
of all, I think these judges are
3:30
out of control. There's no doubt
3:32
there there is a place for a
3:34
nationwide injunction, but usually relates to
3:36
things like we did when we sued
3:38
Joe Biden for not enforcing deportation
3:40
laws. This is a president, Donald Trump,
3:42
who's actually trying to enforce the
3:44
existing laws. And these judges
3:47
are stepping into a role that is not
3:49
theirs. They're not the executive. They're not the president.
3:51
But I do think over time, we're going
3:54
to win these cases. And I think we're
3:56
going to start seeing the Trump administration push
3:58
more and more of these illegals out. But you're
4:00
right. The lab, their philosophy was get these people
4:02
in here as fast as possible. And
4:05
that's what they did. It was like
4:07
three or four million people a year that
4:09
they pushed into this country and moved
4:11
them all over the country and took care
4:13
of all of their needs to the
4:15
detriment of the American people. I mean, I
4:18
think you're smart to use things like
4:20
the Alien Enemies Act, right? I think that
4:22
was part of the plan to sort
4:24
of allow for to make removal easier, you
4:26
know, particularly for, you know, these gangbangers
4:28
and bad people. What
4:30
do you think to yourself when
4:32
you see Democrats like Chris Van
4:34
Hollen going to El Salvador to
4:36
advocate for a guy and a
4:38
legal alien who, you know, a
4:40
couple of judges thought to believe
4:42
that he was an MS -13 member,
4:45
that even the Prince George's Police
4:47
Department thought to be an MS
4:49
-13 member? I think the center
4:51
is a pathetic center because you're
4:53
talking about people in this country
4:55
that did really bad things. They've
4:57
done evil things to American people
4:59
that are doing evil things and
5:01
that will be a risk and
5:03
a threat. I mean, they're one,
5:05
they're here illegally. But second of all,
5:07
they're being targeted because they're criminals. And
5:10
we've got senators, you'd think
5:12
that he's got a multi -trillion
5:14
dollar budget deficit every year. He's
5:16
got all kinds of problems in
5:18
America and he's off helping some guy
5:20
in Al Salvador who's a threat
5:22
to our society. I don't know what's
5:24
wrong with that senator, but he's
5:27
got issues. Well, it clearly shows that
5:29
we're not the priority. They've given
5:31
up trying to appeal to American voters.
5:34
It's not about America first, it's
5:36
Americans last. And
5:38
you see, they don't even really have
5:40
to clear a pathway for
5:42
illegal aliens to be able to
5:44
vote because they're already impacting the
5:46
power dynamics in the country with
5:48
the census, right of non -citizens
5:51
being included in the apportionment for
5:53
both the House of Representatives as
5:55
well as for electoral colleges. And
5:57
we heard from Representative Yvette Clark
6:00
during a hearing in 2021. And
6:02
she said, my district can absorb
6:04
a significant number of these migrants
6:06
adding, I just need more people
6:08
in my district for redistricting purposes.
6:11
That's one of the nefarious. I mean, that's kind of the goal, right? Yeah,
6:13
yeah, it's one of the nefarious goals. I think
6:15
there's several goals. That's certainly, they ultimately
6:18
want these people voting, but definitely the
6:20
first step was using those numbers to
6:22
add their numbers in the House so
6:24
they can control the US House. and
6:26
potentially even affects Senate seats. So
6:28
there's no doubt and potentially presidential elections.
6:31
So there's no doubt that they
6:33
had nefarious purposes. They know they can't
6:35
win on their message. They see
6:37
it. They see that their message doesn't
6:39
help America. And so
6:41
they import votes and they import
6:43
strategies that help them hold
6:45
on to power at the expense
6:48
of the of the
6:50
American peo think I
6:52
know that you've b
6:54
even in red state
6:56
of tex are Democrats
6:58
doubling dow sports? You
7:01
know, that one
7:03
to me. I
7:05
don't understand w
7:07
parents who have
7:09
daughters to have
7:11
to deal with
7:13
t effectively eliminates
7:15
do from being able
7:17
to compete in sports. And the
7:19
whole purpose of federal laws protecting women's
7:21
sports was this, so that they
7:23
would have an opportunity to compete. They'd
7:25
have a fair opportunity to compete,
7:27
fair opportunity to participate. And now the
7:30
Democrats are saying, no, we're going
7:32
to let men have an unfair advantage
7:34
and come compete against women. It
7:36
doesn't make any sense to me. I
7:38
don't even, I don't understand at
7:40
all. It's one of the most, I
7:42
guess, mysterious positions that they've taken.
7:44
You know, it's interesting too. I'm sure you
7:46
remember, like I was working on Capitol Hill and
7:48
in politics and I remember the whole like
7:50
war on women, right? Like Republicans were engaging
7:52
in this war on women. It played out in
7:54
the 2012 presidential race as well with Mitt
7:57
Romney being like a binder's full of women, which
7:59
was a strange comment to make. But, you
8:01
know, I digress. But now, to
8:03
your point, it's not just gauging a
8:05
war on women. They're trying to erase
8:07
women. It's
8:09
confusing. It's very confusing.
8:12
I mean, these statutes were designed
8:14
to give them some funding and some
8:16
opportunity and sort of generally agreed
8:18
on by as a bipartisan really issue,
8:20
even though they claimed it was
8:22
a democratic issue. The reality is now
8:24
they've flipped it on its head
8:26
and they're opposing women. I'm
8:28
shocked that more democratic women are
8:30
upset about this. Those women have
8:32
children as well. They have daughters
8:34
who should have a fair opportunity
8:36
to compete and be equally funded.
8:39
And that's obviously getting flipped ahead
8:41
if you allow men to participate
8:43
in women's sports. I don't even
8:45
understand why, honestly, I don't
8:47
understand why men want to participate in women's sports.
8:49
It seems like a I
8:51
don't know, they have an unfair advantage and
8:53
why they would feel good about themselves winning
8:55
in a women's sports. I don't, I don't
8:57
understand that either. Yeah, I mean, like the
8:59
men doing that, I question their desire to
9:01
want to be in a woman's locker room.
9:04
I question their desire to want to steal
9:06
those opportunities for women. You know, that makes
9:08
me very suspicious of these men, right? And
9:10
they're, you know, what their
9:12
true motivations are. It's, you know, questioned
9:14
their mental health as well. We've
9:16
got more with Attorney General Ken Paxton,
9:18
but first, As we celebrate this
9:21
holy season, let's take a moment to
9:23
reflect on God's creation. You.
9:26
In Psalms, we learn that God knit you
9:28
together in your mother's womb. His
9:30
eye saw your unformed body. He saw
9:32
who you were created to be before you
9:34
became you. Pre -born ministries
9:36
wants to remind you that each one of
9:38
you is made in the image of God
9:40
and life is sacred. Life is eternal. You
9:42
may have come to Earth as an unplanned
9:44
pregnancy, but whether planned or unplanned, your life
9:46
is value and every day of your life
9:49
is ordained by God. Please take a
9:51
moment today to thank God for life. And
9:53
we invite you to remember babies in their
9:55
mother's wombs. Their lives count too. Last
9:57
year alone, pre -born's network of
9:59
clinics rescued over 67 ,000 babies from
10:01
abortion. Your tax -deductible donation
10:04
of $28 sponsors one ultrasound and
10:06
doubles a baby's chance at life.
10:08
How many babies can you save? Hey,
10:27
Matt Gaetz here. Listen, after everything we've
10:29
been through the last few years,
10:31
saying we have trust issues is an
10:33
understatement. They pushed a questionable vaccine,
10:35
and when we asked for alternatives like
10:37
ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, They shut us
10:39
down. They used pressure, lies, and red
10:41
tape to block access to medications
10:44
that were once easy to get. That
10:46
cannot happen again. And with
10:48
all family pharmacy, it won't. All
10:50
family pharmacy is redefining health
10:52
care. No waiting rooms, no delays,
10:54
no insurance games, just direct
10:56
access to over 200 trusted medications,
10:58
including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, menbendazole, antibiotics,
11:00
emergency kits, and so much more.
11:02
You can customize your order
11:04
and have it shipped straight to
11:06
your door. They believe in
11:08
medical freedom. You decide what works
11:11
for your health, not some
11:13
bloated system. Over 100 ,000 Americans
11:15
already trust them, and maybe it's
11:17
time you do too. Go
11:19
to allfamilyfarmacy .com forward slash USA
11:21
and use code USA10 for 10
11:23
% off your first order. Again,
11:25
that's allfamilyfarmacy .com slash USA with
11:27
code USA10 for 10 % off.
11:30
Time is precious and so are our pets.
11:32
So time with our pets is extra
11:34
precious. That's why we started Dutch.
11:36
Dutch provides 24 -7 access to licensed
11:38
vets with unlimited virtual visits and follow
11:40
-ups for up to five pets. You
11:43
can message a vet at any time and
11:45
schedule a video visit the same day. Our
11:47
vets can even prescribe medication for
11:49
many ailments and shipping is always free.
11:52
With Dutch you'll get more time with your pets and
11:54
year -round peace of mind when it comes to their
11:57
vet care. You've
12:01
decided to get in
12:03
to primarying Senator John Cornyn.
12:05
What provoked that? Why
12:07
did you make that decision?
12:10
So it's just been too long.
12:12
He's been there for 24 years.
12:14
He wants to be there for
12:16
33 decades of serving Mitch McConnell,
12:18
effectively what he's done. It's
12:20
been Mitch McConnell's lap dog. And
12:22
he hasn't represented the people of
12:24
Texas. OK, maybe he's a Republican
12:27
from New York. We might accept
12:29
his week. behavior and his lack
12:31
of ability to lead on important
12:33
Republican issues. But, you know,
12:35
he's been the guy that was, you know,
12:37
Joe Biden's guy for passing gun restrictions.
12:39
Well, that wasn't a very popular issue in
12:41
Texas. Certainly not what we sent him
12:44
to do, but he did it. He enabled
12:46
the ATF to push for even greater
12:48
expanse of gun restrictions that I had to
12:50
go sue them over. Had John Cornyn
12:52
not done that, I wouldn't be in the
12:54
middle of those lawsuits. But he effectively
12:56
is fighting against his own people.
12:58
He's been an outspoken critic of the border
13:01
wall and Trump's border wall. He said
13:03
it over and over that he didn't want
13:05
a border wall. He's insinuated an embassy
13:07
is a path that he likes. That's,
13:09
again, very unpopular in Texas. And he's also
13:11
been a, he's been, he's been in opposition to
13:14
President Trump in 2016 when he said he
13:16
was an albatross around our neck. And then in
13:18
2024, he insinuated that he was a criminal
13:20
and that he was not going to support Trump,
13:22
that we needed to move in a different
13:24
direction. And I heard him on the radio today,
13:26
supposedly saying that he was, he's just as
13:28
aligned with Donald Trump as I am. Well, maybe
13:30
today, Johnny come lately, because he's in a
13:32
primary, but that has not been his position over
13:35
the last, you know, 12 years
13:37
or 10 years that Trump's been around. But
13:39
I think Texas is kind of an interesting
13:41
state too, because it's sort of like losing the
13:43
football for Democrats, you know, they keeping like,
13:45
this is our cycle, we're gonna, you know, we're
13:47
gonna win statewide. And then, you
13:49
know, inevitably they don't, you know,
13:51
sort of looking ahead at the midterms,
13:54
you know, what are you seeing in Texas?
13:56
You know, what are you hearing sort
13:58
of electorally of what this might look like
14:00
for us as a party? You
14:03
know, we're pretty far out. I think,
14:05
you know, midterms typically don't go as well
14:07
for the party in power, but it
14:09
all depends on performance. And if Trump can
14:11
pick up this economy, which I think
14:14
he will, he's had success in the past.
14:17
If the economy is in shape, usually that
14:19
means good things for the party in
14:21
power. So I'm optimistic because I believe in
14:23
Donald Trump, I believe in his policies,
14:25
and I think they're good for America. So
14:27
as long as we're performing well in
14:29
two years, I think we'll
14:31
be fine if we have trouble with
14:33
the economy for whatever reason, then that's
14:35
always more of a challenge. Where are
14:37
you on the tariffs? I'm a
14:39
free trader, but I also want fair trade.
14:42
And I think what the president is trying
14:44
to address is the fact that many of
14:46
these countries, particularly China, but other countries
14:48
as well, have not treated us fairly. And I
14:50
think he's trying to even the playing field. I think
14:52
in the end, we're going to see a lot
14:54
more trade, a lot more free trade, and it's not
14:56
going to be so one -sided. I think what the
14:58
president is trying to do is correct the
15:00
wrongs of the past that no other
15:02
president willing to do. And we've been at
15:04
the short end of the stick. And
15:06
I think he's trying to fix that. And,
15:08
you know, I applaud him for making
15:11
the significant attempt to do that. How do
15:13
you think he's doing so far this
15:15
term? Look, I
15:17
think he's working faster than I've ever seen
15:19
any president work. And I said that
15:21
about his first term, that he was the
15:23
most effective president in four years that
15:25
I'd ever seen, getting more good things done
15:27
for Americans than I did anyway. And
15:29
I was a huge Ronald Reagan family. Ronald
15:31
Reagan did what he did in eight years. Trump did
15:33
what he did in four years. And the
15:36
reality is he's moving even faster
15:38
with this dough stuff and putting out
15:40
his executive orders to eliminate regulations
15:42
and to free up the American economy.
15:45
He's putting in great people into cabinet positions.
15:48
I mean, I give the guy a for the
15:50
first few months of this term. I hope
15:52
it continues. And I think it will. Have
15:55
you been surprised at all
15:57
to the opposition to Dosh and
15:59
trying to cut some federal
16:01
spending? Heck no, I expect
16:03
it. There's entrenched power forces, people
16:05
making trillions, you know, we got trillions
16:07
of dollars in debt. They're making
16:09
billions of dollars. Look at Stacey Abrams
16:11
gets a payoff of two billion
16:13
or whatever she got for her. tiny
16:16
little nonprofit. Of course, people
16:18
are going to hate the stop
16:20
of free money that doesn't
16:22
benefit any of us except the
16:24
people that are getting it.
16:26
So I totally am not surprised
16:29
by the resistance to the
16:31
gravy train, the free money, the
16:33
taxpayer payouts. It's
16:35
necessary for us to get our budget
16:37
and our deficit under control. And
16:39
of course, there's going to be opposition to doing
16:41
the right thing. Thank you, President Trump and Elon
16:43
Musk for getting this done. Are
16:46
you sure you want to try to go
16:48
to Washington DC? There's that infamous quote that,
16:50
you know, if you want a friend in
16:52
Washington, get a dog. Are
16:54
you sure you want to
16:56
go to DC? I'm
16:58
not going for fun. I'm not going to
17:00
make friends. I'm going to represent my state
17:02
in a way that's been better than John
17:04
Corrin. even dreamed of
17:06
trying. This is the first attempt he's
17:08
made at trying now that he has a primary
17:10
opponent. But you know, we just
17:12
deserve better representation. If we're going to fix
17:15
this country, we can't have a John Cornyn
17:17
from Texas messing that up. We need. two
17:19
good centers. We have one and we can
17:21
see the difference. It's pretty clear that the
17:23
people of Texas has two very different centers.
17:25
Ted Cruz is a shining example of what
17:27
you need to be, and John Cohen is
17:29
a failure, and it's time even his own
17:31
supporters know that he should run for his
17:34
fifth term. He's been in office over 40
17:36
years, and he's a 30
17:38
year incumbent in the U .S. Senate.
17:40
That's too long. John, take
17:42
a vacation, do something different, retire, but
17:44
it's been too long. Attorney
17:47
General, is there anything else you'd like to leave
17:49
us with before we go? Look, I think that we
17:51
have a great opportunity here. We have a great
17:53
president. We have great leaders with great vice president. We
17:55
have the House. We have the Senate. We
17:57
have the opportunity now if we continue
17:59
to elect conservative Republicans that will push
18:01
the envelope. We We can fix the
18:03
problems that we have, get us on
18:06
a better path, and we have a
18:08
bright future. If we don't do that,
18:10
we just waste our four years and
18:12
we don't elect the right people, then
18:14
we're going to suffer the consequence. So
18:16
I'm optimistic, and that's I'm Attorney
18:19
Ken Paxton of Texas, appreciate you
18:21
making the time, sir. Hey,
18:24
thank you. Have a great day. I
18:26
want to thank Attorney General Ken Paxton for
18:28
coming on the show. to thank you guys at
18:30
home for listening. Every Tuesday and Thursday, you
18:32
can listen throughout the week. Until next time. Time
18:35
is precious and so are our pets. So
18:37
time with our pets is extra precious. That's
18:39
why we started Dutch. Dutch provides
18:41
24 -7 access to licensed vets with
18:44
unlimited virtual visits and follow -ups for
18:46
up to five pets. You
18:48
can message a vet at any time and
18:50
schedule a video visit the same day. Our
18:52
vets can even prescribe medication for
18:54
many ailments and shipping is always free.
18:57
With Dutch you'll get more time your pets and
18:59
year peace of mind when it comes to their
19:01
vet care.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More