Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Released Saturday, 26th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Google Is Promoting Ad Blockers On YouTube - WAN Show April 25, 2025

Saturday, 26th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The missing child is Lucia

0:02

Blix, nine years old. Please,

0:04

let's her come back home

0:06

safely. Thursdays. The kidnappers plund

0:09

it meticulously. If money

0:11

is what it takes to get her

0:13

back, we're going to pay it. The

0:15

secrets they hide. You can't talk about

0:17

this. You can't write about it. Are

0:20

the clues. The mother's hiding something

0:22

I know it. To find her.

0:24

Tell me where she is. The

0:26

stolen girl. New episodes Thursday. Stream

0:28

on Hulu. What's

0:36

up everyone? Welcome to

0:38

the Wancho. We've got a

0:40

great show lined up here

0:43

this week because... How

0:45

can Google unilaterally remove

0:48

my video about ad blockers,

0:50

but then run ads on

0:52

YouTube for ad blockers? This

0:55

does not make sense. This

0:57

is Chubaka. Chubaka

0:59

lives on Kashik. He does

1:01

not make sense. Also,

1:04

he makes credits. In the

1:06

news this week, Intel's having a

1:08

bit of a classic Coke moment,

1:10

where the new Intel CPU

1:12

is not nearly as beloved

1:15

as the old Intel CPU

1:17

that overheats and dies, which

1:19

is hard to deal with. What

1:21

else we got this week,

1:23

Mr. Luke? Oblivion! Oh my god, really?

1:25

Oblivion happened, it was remastered, Bethesda released,

1:28

there's more to talk about other than

1:30

that, but oh my, oh my goodness.

1:32

Everyone knew that was going to be

1:35

a topic of mine. I blew the

1:37

only one that I had for sure,

1:39

and other than that, I don't know.

1:41

They all kind of suck. Discord CEO

1:44

is stepping down. Whole load blown, because

1:46

it's like, you know, that reference and

1:48

also oblivion with the long

1:50

loading times. Oh. Loading Simulator

1:52

oblivion. The loading times are

1:55

pretty good now. The

2:18

show is brought to today

2:20

by Vessie, Squarespace, and Notion,

2:22

and of course, as usual.

2:24

Our rap partner, D-brand, our

2:26

laptop, partner, Dell, and our

2:28

chair partner, Secret Lab. Let's

2:30

talk about this. Google is

2:33

apparently completely cool, with ad block

2:35

advertising on YouTube. Are they cool

2:37

with it or was it just

2:39

there? You know how you know how

2:42

when there's like an inflammatory thing

2:44

that you're reporting on? Yes Whether

2:46

you cause play as a journalist

2:48

or not you sort of just

2:50

have a moral you might say

2:52

Obligation to reach out and get

2:54

the other side of the story

2:56

so did we do so because

2:58

that's just kind of basic human

3:01

decency I reached out to Google

3:03

asking yo, what's the deal with

3:05

all of these ads? that I'm

3:07

getting for this service called Pie.

3:09

So this is this is Pie

3:11

ad block, which I don't know

3:13

is maybe gonna get the

3:15

wann show freaking takedown by

3:17

YouTube because you might remember this

3:20

recently we did a video part

3:22

two of D Google Your Life

3:24

where we talked yes about the

3:26

boogie man ad block and how

3:29

to use it on YouTube. Okay,

3:31

so I'm I'm showing this right

3:33

now. But the only reason I'm

3:35

aware of pie, Luke, is because I

3:38

keep getting fed ads for it on

3:40

YouTube. And talking to some of

3:42

the other writers here, they've been

3:44

apparently getting a lot of ads

3:47

for pie as well. So let

3:49

me, let me, you know what, I'll

3:51

actually read the document that

3:53

our writing team so

3:56

graciously prepared for us. Do

3:58

you recognize these people? this?

4:00

Ah yes okay Mr. Jordan

4:02

Block went and look

4:04

at all this work

4:07

he did for us

4:09

boom he's got the

4:11

people's intricate yeah here

4:14

we go the

4:16

people's internet okay so

4:18

do you recognize any

4:20

of these ads these are

4:23

all ads for pie no

4:25

okay well I bet you guys

4:27

do so far still no

4:29

Only thing I see is I

4:31

have YouTube premium, oh for crying out

4:34

loud. Yeah, I have YouTube premium, I

4:36

don't, uh... Well, I don't have YouTube

4:38

premium on my work account. Are these

4:40

the people that read ads for everything?

4:43

Is that the point? Well, those are

4:45

just, like, those are the, those are

4:47

the, those are the, like, the ads for

4:49

the, like, the ads for pie. Oh, so

4:52

it's basically asking if I've seen the

4:54

ad before? Yeah, yeah, I'm just asking

4:56

if you've seen the ad before.

4:59

No. Well, whatever. Honey co-founder, Ryan

5:01

Hudson, is back with a new project.

5:03

The pie ad blocker, which seems to

5:05

be advertising absolutely

5:08

everywhere recently, including on

5:10

YouTube. Google's ad transparency

5:12

site shows that pie

5:15

has approximately... 40 different

5:17

text ads and 800

5:19

different video ads active

5:21

in Google ads when we

5:23

checked earlier today. 800. Pi says

5:26

that you can block ads and

5:28

get paid, although the PiFAQ

5:30

seems mostly concerned

5:32

with distancing themselves

5:34

from honey slash

5:36

PayPal. This discovery on

5:38

my part comes just seven

5:41

months. after Google unilaterally removed

5:43

our D. Google Your Life

5:45

Part 2 video for violating

5:48

YouTube's community guidelines

5:50

as potentially harmful

5:52

or dangerous content, which it

5:54

turns out translates to telling

5:57

people how to block ads

5:59

on YouTube. So I reached out

6:01

to YouTube and by my

6:03

standards very politely asked, what

6:05

the fuck is this? I

6:07

was a little frustrated

6:10

by the experience to

6:12

say the least. I basically

6:14

said, hey, so what's the

6:16

deal with this? Like what

6:19

is the policy distinction between

6:21

me posting a video talking

6:24

about ad blocking on YouTube

6:26

versus an advertiser. paying for

6:28

positioning for their ad blocker on

6:31

YouTube. And they basically went, oh,

6:33

well, I don't know. You'll have to

6:35

get me the ad ID of that ad.

6:37

And I'm kind of sitting here going,

6:39

well, what does that even mean? Why

6:41

does it, why does it matter? Why

6:44

do you need the ID of

6:46

the, like it felt like I

6:48

was just being asked to jump

6:50

through a completely unnecessary hoop. This

6:52

is an ad for an ad blocker. So

6:54

they have a domain. Presumably,

6:56

you, Google, the entity, have an ad

6:58

service that knows what the fuck domain,

7:01

an ad that people click on, goes

7:03

to, find one that goes to that

7:05

domain and let me know. Right? Am

7:07

I missing something here? No. If it

7:09

goes to this ad block, or just find

7:11

anyone, I don't care, it doesn't

7:13

have to be the exact one.

7:15

Why does it? Is it irrelevant

7:17

detail? Anyway. We jumped through the

7:19

hoop. Jordan, very helpfully, found me

7:21

an ID, and also you can

7:23

see, got that helpful little link that

7:26

shows how many of these flip-in

7:28

video ads they have running right

7:30

now, which Google could have easily done.

7:32

They could have just gone and

7:34

found that list and then shown

7:36

me, responded, about any one

7:38

of them. Basically, so I sent that

7:40

over to them, and they're kind of

7:42

like, oh, well, Google's divisions

7:45

have a lot of separation. So

7:47

ads have a different set

7:49

of policies compared to YouTube

7:51

videos. And there is currently

7:53

no policy against advertising an

7:56

ad blocker, even though that

7:58

ad blocker appears as. content

8:01

on fucking YouTube. What if,

8:03

what if, what if, what

8:05

if, what if, you buy ads

8:07

for the Google Google Buy

8:09

your life video? Apparently,

8:12

that's kosher. What? So

8:15

making people watch it, it's

8:17

more okay. That having it

8:19

be optional. If the

8:22

content is bad, it's more

8:24

okay if you make people watch

8:26

it. than if you make it

8:28

optional for them to watch. That's

8:31

what is being communicated to me

8:33

personally. That's what I'm taking from

8:35

this. And yeah, yeah, CatOS points

8:38

out that ads on YouTube videos,

8:40

ads on YouTube are videos on the

8:42

platform, like in terms of how they

8:44

work on the back end. So you

8:47

100% can upload a video to

8:49

YouTube that contains instructions

8:51

for ad blocking, as long as you

8:53

do an ad by against it. other

8:56

YouTube rules you can break? Like how

8:58

far can you take that? Because there's

9:00

a lot of things that I could

9:03

think in Google ads that are

9:05

against YouTube terms of service.

9:07

Chewy, our community, our community,

9:10

coordinate, I don't know what the

9:12

heck his job title is, but

9:14

whatever, he's cool. He says in

9:16

chat, if you stop paying for

9:18

the video to be shown as an ad,

9:20

will it then get struck down? I

9:22

don't know. But it's

9:24

a good question. I just... Look, I

9:27

feel like this is one of those

9:29

times when people are gonna try

9:31

to find some gotcha. So let

9:33

me clarify my stance. I don't

9:35

use ad blockers. That is a

9:37

personal choice that I've made because I

9:39

am a content creator and it

9:41

would feel pretty hypocritical of me

9:43

to use ad blockers when I

9:46

am both aware of and educate

9:48

people on the impact that

9:50

it has on content creators.

9:52

I do not and have never

9:54

said, never use an ad

9:56

block or you fucking

9:58

monster, horrible. I have never said

10:00

that, that has never happened. If you think

10:03

it happened, you imagined it, or someone lied

10:05

to you and told you that it happens.

10:07

That is the only... You said it to

10:09

me behind the scenes. That is the only

10:11

way that those things could have been

10:13

an experience that you had. We

10:15

have explicitly... provided instructions on ad

10:17

blocking before on our channel. We've

10:20

done a video on piehole. We

10:22

have the Google Your Life video.

10:24

We've discussed our histories as pirates

10:26

before we could afford to buy

10:28

things extensively on the WAN show.

10:30

So, no. The big controversy is

10:32

I said ad blocks piracy because

10:34

it is and some people got

10:36

butt hurt. That's pretty much what

10:38

it boils down to, but I

10:40

never said don't do piracy. I

10:42

never said put away your eye

10:44

patch and your trichorn hat. I

10:47

just said. Well, it's a form

10:49

of piracy. You're circumventing the payment

10:51

on the platform, therefore piracy. It's

10:53

kind of simple. It's actually

10:55

really simple. So I'm

10:57

not upset that Google is

10:59

promoting ad blockers on a platform

11:01

where I rely on ads. What I'm

11:03

upset about is the hypocrisy

11:06

that we are seeing from, and

11:08

I get it. Companies have silos.

11:10

You know, they'll have different policies,

11:13

they'll have different teams. There's

11:15

all these, there's all these

11:17

factors that I think people

11:19

who have never worked for

11:21

a larger company don't consider.

11:23

It is not surprising to me

11:26

that this happened. What is surprising

11:28

to me though is now that it's been

11:30

flagged that it is not just, oh,

11:32

duh, obvious that this should not be.

11:34

Because if your policy is...

11:36

that because of user

11:38

safety, potentially harmful or

11:40

dangerous content, that my video

11:42

showing people how to block ads

11:45

on YouTube was removed. Not

11:47

just they contacted me and

11:49

we had a conversation and

11:51

we agreed to take it down.

11:54

No, removed. And then they contacted

11:56

me. Actually, I think I've read

11:58

about it on Reddit. first I

12:00

don't I don't actually remember the

12:03

point is they just ripped the

12:05

video down so that's what

12:07

happens there but if you're

12:09

running it as an ad well I

12:11

don't know it's a different team

12:13

I don't know what that doesn't make

12:16

any sense but hey they had a

12:18

good earnings call there they're out

12:20

power how many how many points

12:22

I can't remember and we've

12:25

got a couple other points here

12:27

it wasn't long ago 2023 That

12:30

Google sponsored a conference for ad

12:32

block developers and at least five

12:35

Google employees gave presentations At the

12:37

same time that YouTube was getting

12:39

more aggressive in dealing with ad

12:41

blocking. Yeah, that doesn't surprise me

12:44

that much Unique username says not

12:46

to be that guyliness, but I

12:48

don't think anyone ever used the

12:50

word piracy for what you described

12:52

So at least some confusion is warranted

12:55

IMO I'm sorry. I just actually

12:57

don't think it's that complicated

12:59

Right, like that's what we call

13:02

it. We don't call it

13:04

theft because if you don't

13:06

remove it or whatever, you

13:08

know, whatever the rationalization is,

13:10

right? Like if you don't

13:12

actually remove it from the

13:14

possession of the person who has

13:16

it, then it can't be theft.

13:18

I'm like, sure, okay. Like

13:21

it doesn't matter. It's all

13:23

semantics, right? Like that's the

13:25

whole point, is that it is

13:27

functionally the same thing. But is

13:29

it really not the point today? Because

13:31

I just don't care. I just don't care.

13:33

You do whatever works for you. And if

13:35

you have like a super guilty conscience

13:37

or whatever, and it makes you like

13:39

really mad when someone calls you out and

13:42

is like that's what you're doing, that's your

13:44

thing. You go deal with that. You talk

13:46

to your therapist about it, you talk

13:48

to your mom about it, you talk to

13:50

your friends about it. Or just don't care.

13:52

Or just don't care. Or go on team you

13:54

while you while you still can. While you still

13:56

can. And order a tricorn hat. and

13:59

an eye patch. That's also an

14:01

option. Yeah, I think a lot of

14:03

people are dusting them off right now.

14:05

Oh, I like dude, big time. Dude,

14:08

did Netflix just raise pricing again? I

14:10

didn't, I feel like that is a

14:12

statement. I could say that any time.

14:15

Question and answer, that is permanently

14:17

true. Yeah. Uh, we should. Okay,

14:19

I sent you this. You should have an

14:21

LTT eye patch. It's a pretty good

14:23

idea. That's actually a really good

14:25

idea. Dan. Can you send it

14:27

to the corn hat? And then

14:29

you get, if it's a combo, then

14:31

you get them at a lower price.

14:34

And if you steal them from us,

14:36

you get it for free. Which, I

14:38

mean, it's sort of. That's kind

14:40

of how that works. That kind

14:42

of goes without saying. A group

14:44

that did a price increase in

14:46

a way that I think was

14:48

really cool recently, and I

14:50

sent to you was dropout. Remember

14:53

that? Yes. Dropout. Why

14:55

is my thing not working?

14:57

Oh, it's dropout.TV. I was

14:59

doing dropout.com. Anyways, they had

15:01

a video on it and

15:03

you can tell they did

15:05

something right here when the

15:07

video on them increasing their

15:09

pricing was like very well

15:12

liked and the comments are

15:14

really positive. Yeah, it was

15:16

like one minute long too. It

15:18

was really short. Basically, they

15:20

were just like, yeah, we're increasing pricing, but

15:22

it's only for new people. Here we go. Price

15:25

changed warning. Two minutes. But I watched it at

15:27

1.75, so it probably took me a minute.

15:29

Yeah, it's so short. Vlog Brothers respondents just charged

15:31

me more, Dork, and people liked it. This

15:33

comment, you know when you have something special,

15:35

when an announcement that you're raising your prices,

15:38

has an overwhelmingly positive comment section. And it's

15:40

legit. And it's because they did it did

15:42

it did it in a cool way. Well,

15:44

they didn't even do it in a cool

15:46

way. They just did it the way it

15:48

should be done in it. And everyone else

15:50

sucks. Yeah. I think it was, yeah, it

15:53

goes up for new customers and it goes

15:55

up for returning customers. So if you canceled

15:57

and are coming back and it went up

15:59

as well. I will do you one better. Our returning

16:01

customers keep their existing pricing. But

16:03

we might have to change that at some point.

16:06

That probably doesn't make sense forever. Because someone's returning

16:08

from 2017. Yeah. Are they really a returning customer?

16:10

I think the way that YouTube defines a new

16:12

viewer to the channel is 90 days. It's either

16:14

90 days or 30 days or something. I wouldn't

16:16

mind having a buffer. That seems reasonable. I think

16:18

a little buffer might be reasonable, but I think

16:20

if someone's coming back after a year or whatever,

16:22

they can just... Clearly they're doing the thing where

16:24

they buy for one month download everything Then cancel

16:26

and then watch it and that's fine But then

16:28

they can pay you can pay full price They

16:30

can pay a couple dollars more. Yeah, it's not

16:32

gonna kill them I just want to point out

16:34

because like again We we talk about how there's a lot of to

16:36

point out because like again We talk about how there's there's a lot

16:39

of negative news. I just want to point out because like again we

16:41

we talk about how there's there's like again We talk about how to

16:43

point out because like again we talk about how to point out because

16:45

like again. I'm not to point out there's like we talk about how

16:47

to point out because like again. I'm not to point out. I'm not going to

16:49

point out. I'm not to point out. I'm not going to point out. I'm like

16:51

we talk about how to point out. I'm like we talk about how to point

16:53

out. I'm not going to point out. I'm not going to point out. I'm like

16:55

we talk about Again, I can't make

16:57

this clear enough. At no

16:59

point in time. We have

17:01

literally made videos on how

17:03

to do what you're doing.

17:05

We've talked about the benefits.

17:08

We will probably continue

17:10

helping you. We will. We will.

17:12

We will. We're talking about

17:14

it right now. We're talking about

17:17

it right now. We're talking about

17:19

it right now. I am mad

17:21

because my video on de-gooling

17:23

your life, which included... This

17:26

the wrong way. I choose not

17:28

to use them. That's a personal

17:30

choice. You choose to use

17:32

them for whatever reason you like.

17:34

And that is your personal

17:37

choice. And that's a legit

17:39

reason. And it's piracy.

17:41

And I don't care. And you shouldn't

17:44

care either. If you don't care.

17:46

Yeah. That's it. It's okay. You

17:48

know what? You don't need to

17:50

talk to your therapist about

17:52

it anymore. I will do that

17:54

for you. We're going to take

17:56

whatever parasocial relationship we had and

17:59

just try. We're going to turn

18:01

it up to 11. Oh man.

18:03

All right, our discussion

18:05

question on this topic

18:08

is, why didn't you

18:10

warn us about pie,

18:12

Linus? Yeah. Why didn't I?

18:14

Why didn't you? Why didn't I?

18:16

Honestly? Dispointed I don't click on ad

18:18

so I don't I didn't know what

18:20

it was I just I just could

18:22

tell that it was an ad blocker

18:24

so I call I basically got mad

18:26

at YouTube I was super suss because

18:29

this is the first time I've ever

18:31

heard of this yeah and they say

18:33

get paid and I was immediately like

18:35

oh what's going on so they say

18:37

browse you got to read the whole

18:39

line browse ad free with pie ad

18:41

block and earn cash rewards for the

18:43

ads you choose to see I read

18:45

some credit threads real quick and

18:47

stuff. Isn't this just brave? I

18:49

think it's kind of like

18:52

distributed brave, I think. You can put

18:54

it on other browsers. I found

18:56

this interesting. Featured by Google,

18:58

verified by Google. Can you,

19:00

okay, go to the actual chrome store

19:02

though, is it actually, is that real?

19:05

That looks like an image. I don't

19:07

think that's even, I don't think that

19:09

even pulls like, like, from the API

19:11

or anything. I did, not play store,

19:13

what am I doing? What am I

19:15

doing? What am I doing? What are

19:17

you doing? It's right here though, it

19:19

found it anyways, good job Google. It

19:22

didn't say featured on here. Oh okay.

19:24

But it does have a lot of

19:26

ratings. It does have that number of

19:28

ratings though. Yeah. They have a

19:30

good record. I thought this was

19:32

interesting. They flagged themselves as

19:34

a non-trader. A trader? What's

19:36

a trader? So I had to do

19:38

a bunch of research on this a

19:40

while back because we had to flag

19:42

float plane as a trader. But I

19:45

think that's because we receive

19:47

payment. They don't receive payment,

19:49

but if they are sending payment, I

19:51

feel like they would still be a

19:53

trader. And I feel like they're

19:55

trying to get away from this

19:58

because it notes on the end.

20:00

there. What if they're sending

20:02

payment but they're not

20:04

sending any to Russia or

20:06

China are they still a trader?

20:08

Yeah, definitely. Yeah, T-R-A-D-E-R to

20:11

be clear. And it says

20:13

for consumers in the European

20:15

Union, please note that consumer

20:17

rights do not apply to

20:20

contracts between you

20:22

and this developer. Chat knows

20:24

what I want. Where's my ding?

20:26

Oh. I'm

20:29

like conditioned now. I'm the dog. I

20:31

need my I need my I need

20:33

my dang. Yeah. I'm sorry. I missed

20:35

your joke. I didn't think it was

20:37

really like a joke. I wasn't

20:39

listening. You're playing on the

20:41

word traitor. Yeah, but it

20:44

was just like that's classic.

20:46

That's classic thing. Classic thing.

20:48

Classic thing. Classic thing. You

20:50

got a makeup thing. Dan

20:53

knows. Let's go. Oh, that

20:55

feels good. I took that

20:57

from you. Okay, what are

20:59

we supposed to be talking

21:02

about? What are you even

21:04

talking about? Oh, traders, right?

21:06

Trader, Trader Joe. Sorry, Dan's

21:09

sake, I'm sorry I took

21:11

that from you. Okay, sorry.

21:13

Oh man. Extremely

21:16

normal employee boss

21:18

interactions. Oh yeah.

21:21

Jordan says, as soon as I

21:23

started writing this topic, we couldn't get

21:25

a Piad to come up no matter

21:27

what we tried. Is Google watching the

21:29

Wandaq? Hi Google. No, probably not, Jordan.

21:31

Probably they just paused their campaigns. Apparently,

21:34

I've watched a couple of like, I've

21:36

watched a couple of like videos that

21:38

I'm not sure if I was supposed

21:40

to watch about like how bigger organizations

21:42

who do a lot, like tens of

21:44

millions of dollars a year of this

21:47

kind of advertising work. And they are

21:49

like. cycling through creative, they're

21:51

like cycling through campaigns at

21:54

a rate that is, was

21:56

already back then, like unfathomable

21:58

to me. of the size of

22:01

the teams that would need to work

22:03

on this. And now that you can

22:05

have AI agents that would do this

22:07

kind of stuff, I'm sure that it's

22:09

10x, 100x what it was before. It's

22:11

pretty wild. So probably they just had

22:13

a campaign paused and they were working

22:15

on to changeover or something. This is

22:17

not a topic, but there's a

22:19

lot of really, really nefarious advertising

22:21

going on. Which is undisclosed

22:23

advertising with fake AI creators

22:25

talking about life change stuff. Life

22:28

changed. One that I

22:30

saw recently, are you

22:32

going through the change?

22:34

Do you have hair?

22:36

Yeah, yeah, it's very

22:38

new in places. I

22:40

haven't had it before.

22:42

It's a lot to

22:44

talk about it. That

22:46

would help. You are

22:48

the therapist now. Look

22:50

at me. Okay, anyways,

22:52

the one that I

22:54

saw was one account.

22:56

That was constantly it had it

22:58

was always women But they're all

23:00

different and it was clearly not

23:02

like a stories account These were clearly

23:04

just AI generated and it would talk

23:07

about how they they moved to this

23:09

new country to Get away from whatever

23:11

and this current one was like oh

23:13

I moved to the one that I

23:15

saw I think was I moved to

23:17

Poland I'm pretty sure to get away from

23:19

the Trump administration and I was happy with

23:21

all these different things and I learned that

23:23

by law you have to have a water

23:25

filter and my hair and skin has never

23:28

felt better and when I moved out of

23:30

the place that I was in I like

23:32

my water filter so much I was going

23:34

to take it and then my landlord said

23:36

why don't you just look up this brand

23:38

on Amazon and I was like wow what a

23:40

good tip. Und disclosed obvious ad.

23:43

at every single post from this one account,

23:45

because no one seems to look into

23:47

it or care. The comments, by the

23:49

way, the reason why I'm saying it's

23:51

so nefarious, the comments, by the way,

23:53

are all just fighting over political things.

23:56

Nobody's pointing out this is

23:58

clearly an AI-generated content. Did

24:00

you click on any of the commenters? Do

24:02

they seem to be human? I didn't

24:04

click on the commenters. But they were

24:07

all just fighting about, it's all,

24:09

pull it as this way because

24:11

of whatever, Trump, blah blah blah,

24:14

something, blah, blah, blah, whatever. It

24:16

was all just political fighting. I

24:19

was reading about how brain rot

24:21

seems to actually not be a

24:23

figure of speech. Like, you know,

24:26

how when our parents were kids,

24:28

they said that like reading fiction

24:30

was going to rot your brain,

24:33

but like, no, really. like scrolling

24:35

through shorts and stories and

24:37

whatnot seems to actually rot

24:39

your brain like they're they're

24:42

they're measuring very very different

24:44

cognitive outcomes for younger kids I

24:46

think we talked about this recently

24:48

but the the really remarkable thing

24:51

sort of having lived on the

24:53

internet for my entire adult life

24:55

has been watching The intelligence of

24:58

humanity go like this, and the

25:00

intelligence of bots go like this.

25:02

And I feel like we are

25:04

dangerously close to the meeting point,

25:07

or maybe even past it, where-

25:09

For certain members of society, I

25:11

think we're touching- Where the best

25:14

bots, or even a mediocre bot,

25:16

seems a lot- More like a rational

25:18

human being than a lot of

25:20

people I encounter online part of

25:22

the part of the problem There

25:25

needs to be two X speed

25:27

on tic-talk to double the brain

25:29

rot that already That hurts me

25:31

so much that causes me physical

25:33

pain Part of the problem is

25:35

that they're all wrapped up

25:37

in Human disguises I guess and

25:40

to have your deception detector running

25:42

100% of the time is not

25:44

a thing most people do They're

25:47

saying they're also saying that

25:49

Gen Z is supposed to

25:51

be the most gullible generation

25:54

ever Yeah, this is on

25:56

this on political basically

25:58

just talking through how

26:01

the sources of information

26:03

that they go to

26:06

are so full of

26:08

disinformation that they just

26:10

have no, some of them

26:13

obviously not all. You guys

26:15

watched the WAN show so

26:17

you know what's up. But

26:20

yeah, well, anyway, the point

26:22

is... Free Therapy! Let's go!

26:24

But these platforms are so

26:26

full of disinformation and the

26:29

test that they did was

26:31

apparently, it was about 3,000

26:33

students and they showed them

26:36

footage of like riders, or

26:38

not riders, sorry ballot box

26:40

stuffers and we're talking about

26:42

sort of election fraud and

26:44

voter fraud and of the

26:46

3,000 three of them correctly

26:48

identified that the footage was

26:51

not in fact from America

26:53

but it was from Russia.

26:55

point one percent there must

26:57

have been language in the

26:59

in the footage no no there wouldn't

27:01

be because it's just like

27:04

talking talking over it text

27:06

oh I don't know if you

27:08

show a ballot box there's gonna

27:10

be like writing on it or a

27:12

flag or something anyways anyway three

27:15

of them apparently thought to

27:17

like reverse look up or

27:19

Google it or just not take

27:21

it for granted I don't

27:23

know dude it's it's kind of

27:26

it's kind of scary and to

27:28

be clear I think that I

27:30

think that a lot of our

27:32

audience and as much as this

27:34

is sort of for a really

27:36

stupid reason I think a lot

27:38

of our audience is pretty well

27:41

trained to look for multiple sources

27:43

because for us choosing a component

27:45

for our gaming rig is like

27:47

really really important and

27:49

as as as as many problems

27:51

as there are is still somewhat

27:54

okay. Like, I don't think

27:56

it's, I don't think it's

27:58

been polarized. the same way

28:01

that political coverage has. There's

28:03

certain areas where I think

28:05

there's a lot of that. I

28:07

think on like the Apple versus

28:09

Android side, things have devolved into

28:11

the point where you can kind

28:13

of not even really have a

28:16

conversation. And it's not so much

28:18

that with consoles anymore, it's just

28:20

depression. Yeah, yeah. So I really am

28:22

not I'm not necessarily talking about our

28:24

audience here. I think I think that

28:26

not I think that I've seen a

28:28

lot of evidence over the years that

28:30

our audience is a cut above the

28:32

average YouTube you know commenter because I

28:35

read a lot of comments on our

28:37

channel I read a lot of comments

28:39

on other channels and I don't know

28:41

how to say this any more tactfully

28:43

than I that I'm about to

28:45

say it but you know, the

28:48

general population on YouTube is pretty

28:50

fucking stupid, right? Whereas there's

28:52

other than a few

28:55

outliers, it's usually pretty

28:57

well-reasoned discourse. on our videos by

29:00

comparison and I don't know if you

29:02

if you disagree then my own means

29:04

in salt our audience but the only

29:06

reaction that I had wasn't I'm just

29:08

their therapist I'm not their friend better

29:10

my reaction is that you're looking at

29:12

YouTube as a whole that might be

29:14

a better reflection of like society well

29:17

no I know that's that's exactly what

29:19

I mean yeah that's why I'm saying

29:21

like these these issues with a lack

29:23

of media literacy, not being able to

29:25

tell the difference between someone with journalism

29:27

credentials and someone who just claims that

29:29

they're a journalist every once in a

29:32

while, but doesn't demonstrate any of the

29:34

obvious care and attention to journalistic standards,

29:36

right? Like not being able to tell

29:39

the difference. I think the folks that

29:41

are over here can probably tell the

29:43

difference better than the general population.

29:46

Yeah. One thing that I've been wondering

29:48

about, I've actually been... thinking of

29:50

emailing, like trying to find a university

29:52

that has a, I don't know, psychologists

29:54

that might work on something like this and email

29:57

them and see if they'll get back to me,

29:59

but I, I. I genuinely wonder how much

30:01

of it is the physical repetition. Because

30:03

you know how like people that get

30:05

addicted to smoking, some of them will

30:07

need... a replacement for the physical

30:09

act of smoking. Not the nicotine. Yep.

30:12

And something that I've been wondering about

30:14

is all of these apps work the

30:16

same. Like, it's the infinite scroll concept

30:18

that you've actually pushed back on in

30:20

the past. But the infinite scroll concept

30:22

of like, you know, Facebook works that

30:25

way, Instagram works that way, Twitter works

30:27

that way, threads works that way, Tiktalk

30:29

works that way, everything works that way.

30:31

Everything is infinite scroll. You're trying to

30:33

get some product information, dude. Yeah. And

30:35

every website is designed to have to

30:38

scroll forever to find any information about

30:40

it. I genuinely wonder how much of

30:42

the addiction is just going like this.

30:44

Doing this forever. Well, because people that

30:46

will do this for five hours, which

30:49

is not that much of an exaggeration.

30:51

Like, like near idle games, where you

30:53

basically just like click a thing or

30:55

tap a thing or... So your brain is

30:58

barely functioning and you're doing some form

31:00

of physical input and people will talk

31:02

about how you come out of it

31:04

like in a haze. You don't even

31:06

remember what you were doing for the

31:08

last amount of time or whatever. So

31:10

like how much of that is the old TV

31:12

concept of clicking through the channels?

31:14

Like how much of this is literally

31:16

just you swiping your phone because it's

31:19

weird to me how ubiquitous it is.

31:21

There isn't any side-scrolling

31:23

one. They're all

31:25

the same thing. All the apps work

31:27

the same way. And when you're like,

31:29

oh, I should get off Instagram, and

31:31

you load up Twitter, then you go

31:34

do the same thing again, you're not

31:36

actually escaping because they all act the

31:38

same way. So they keep self-referencing. Yeah,

31:40

what is about sliding our finger that

31:42

is lower friction? than tapping our finger,

31:44

I mean figurative friction. By the way,

31:47

I want to make this abundantly clear.

31:49

Tinder is not the same. And Tinder

31:51

is not as popular. We're not saying

31:53

we're like better than other people. I

31:55

doom scroll. Loop doom scrolls. There's doom

31:58

scrolling. We get... We get... caught

32:00

in it too. We're just, take this for

32:02

what it is. Two fish, caught in the

32:04

net, talking to all the other fish in the

32:06

net, going how the fuck did we

32:08

get in this net and what the

32:10

fuck is up with this? I have

32:12

to keep, I'm very proactive about trying

32:15

to set up tools to help me

32:17

avoid it when I can. I will actively, like

32:19

if I notice it starts to get

32:21

bad with a certain app, I'll just

32:23

remove it from my phone completely for

32:25

at least a minimum period of time.

32:28

Sock, yeah, and you can, oh man.

32:30

See, I was thinking about this the

32:32

other night, what the market would be, because

32:34

it's the classic XKCD standards strip,

32:37

right? Like, why do so many

32:39

standards exist? Because everything else is

32:41

imperfect, and there's so many different

32:43

standards. We should just have one

32:45

that's like the one standard to

32:47

rule them all, and then you

32:49

just have an understanding, right? Okay,

32:51

so I was thinking, like, realistically,

32:53

the last thing the world needs

32:55

is another Android skin. But that video

32:57

on the light phone three that we

32:59

did recently which is Like that super

33:01

basic phone that just does calling and

33:03

text you can take pictures and send

33:06

pictures and that is it I got

33:08

like 700,000 800,000 views or something

33:10

like that. There's clearly interest in

33:12

dumb phones, but what people were really

33:14

frustrated by with that particular phone was

33:16

that like it's kind of useless like

33:19

you can't you can't pay for parking.

33:21

You can't You can't use it as

33:23

a digital wallet. You can't send Wi-Fi

33:25

messages, so you can't send

33:28

messages on WhatsApp or Facebook

33:30

passenger. Like it doesn't run

33:32

apps. And I was thinking,

33:34

like, if there was a

33:36

justification for a new Android

33:39

to exist, what's up? Oh, you got

33:41

a pie ad when you wanted to

33:43

look at the... Yeah, okay, there you

33:45

go. How many of you says that? I

33:47

can't remember. The video? 924. Yeah, even

33:49

more now. So people are clearly interested

33:52

in this. People care. I was thinking

33:54

that would be a justification for a

33:56

new skin of Android or for a

33:58

new handset maker to make. a

34:00

detox phone, but that actually has basic

34:02

functionality. So like one of the things

34:04

that you're talking about setting alarms for

34:06

like using apps. You can do that

34:09

on basically anything. You can say like,

34:11

oh, I want to limit my screen

34:13

time to one hour of this a

34:15

day or whatever. But as far as

34:17

I know, they all just let you

34:19

click add more. Yes, or dismiss or

34:21

whatever and another big problem that I

34:23

have is this sameness between the apps

34:26

So because you can't you can't do

34:28

like I'm gonna limit my social apps

34:30

to this amount of time So, okay,

34:32

what, do you do, like, five minute?

34:34

YouTube has scrollable shorts. Instagram has scrollable

34:36

shorts. Tiktok has scrollable shorts. And a

34:39

lot of creators upload to all of

34:41

them anyway. X has stuff. There's so

34:43

many different things. There's so many different

34:45

things. So much stuff. They've got so

34:47

much stuff. They're going to need more

34:49

than one X pretty soon. Three.

34:52

Three. Yeah. Here we go. So, you

34:54

know, what about that? You know, what

34:56

about a phone where you have to

34:58

have, you literally have to have an

35:00

accountability who. I would love it. Who

35:02

keys in a pin. And when you

35:05

said it, you actually cannot look at

35:07

Twitter again that day. Amazing. You

35:09

can't. Yeah. Period. Yeah. Because the

35:11

only solution for me was literally

35:13

to remove the apps from my

35:15

phone. Yep. So I did that with Twitter.

35:18

And Twitter's still off my phone. It's

35:20

been off my phone for quite a

35:22

while now. But the problem that I

35:25

have is like, I'll have a stupid app

35:27

because one person that I know that's

35:29

the only way that they communicate.

35:31

And then that app probably

35:33

does other crap as well. And

35:35

then I'll find myself just like

35:38

accidentally diverted and then, oh,

35:40

whoa, how long just went

35:42

by? And it's like, darn

35:44

it. So sometimes you can

35:46

avoid those things more easily

35:48

sometimes you can't It is what

35:50

it is, but yeah, it sucks. I

35:52

really want to figure out and

35:54

it would be it would be cool

35:56

to me if someone made a video

35:59

on it I don't know if it

36:01

makes sense to be an EltoT video

36:03

or not, but like, what is the theory

36:05

behind why this stuff is so

36:07

addictive? I know like humans are

36:09

generally addicted to information

36:11

and it's like absolute information overflow

36:14

to be able to just scroll

36:16

and there's new stuff all the

36:18

time. It's why scrolling on the

36:20

TV was popular back in the

36:22

day. But I think I think

36:24

there's a physical element to it

36:26

as well with the the actual

36:28

scrolling I know there's a common

36:30

perspective that comes up of like

36:32

oh, I'll just keep scrolling until I

36:35

find one more good one But then what

36:37

do what how do you define a good

36:39

one so then you end up just scrolling

36:42

forever? There's like there's all these

36:44

little concepts to it but it

36:46

would be interesting to to know because

36:48

I haven't personally seen addiction

36:50

is to stimuli not information I

36:53

think I

36:57

feel like we're going to get

37:00

in trouble because we're talking

37:02

about non-text stuff that we

37:04

don't know anything about, and

37:06

then people are going to be

37:08

like, you should have known every

37:10

single possible fact about

37:12

this again every time, by the

37:15

way. But I thought it was both.

37:17

But I don't know. Cool.

37:19

Why don't we talk about

37:21

whatever it is we're supposed

37:23

to be doing right now?

37:25

Let's do some announcements. to

37:27

give a massive shout-out to

37:30

our team at MIBC who's

37:32

been handling the shipment side

37:34

of the ship Storm. They

37:36

have managed to keep pace

37:38

with the unbelievable

37:40

demand that the free shipping

37:42

on orders over $150 LTT

37:45

store.com promotion has generated. Shout

37:47

out those guys. That is

37:49

why the shipstorm sale event.

37:52

has been able to be

37:54

extended because our concern as

37:56

I explained when we first

37:58

launched it. was that if we

38:01

didn't end it after a little over

38:03

a week, I think, was the original

38:05

time frame, they would be so backlogged

38:07

that we wouldn't be able to get

38:09

things over the border before that May

38:11

the second deadline when tariffs, I mean,

38:13

at this point, may, may not, they

38:15

could be this amount, they could be

38:17

this amount, who knows, but that was

38:19

the date that we were working off

38:21

of indicated that pricing would have to

38:24

go up quite significantly. Anyway, we

38:26

were worried that that would be

38:28

the last day we'd be able

38:30

to ship stuff out, but they

38:33

have kept up so incredibly that

38:35

not only are we extending the

38:38

ship storm sail event, but we

38:40

actually have some new things to

38:42

add to it. The power outlet

38:45

is apparently what we're calling our

38:47

B stock. So at the power

38:49

outlet. You can get a great

38:51

deal on open box and pre-owned

38:53

goods. That's a pretty good name.

38:56

We reduce waste. Everyone wins. So

38:58

we have open box backpacks. You

39:00

can get a brand new one,

39:03

but it's missing the box for

39:05

179 USD. No cosmetic wear. You

39:07

can get a used, like new,

39:09

with minor cosmetic wear. And used...

39:12

A grade with moderate cosmetic wear

39:14

and we've got, oh that one's

39:17

sold out apparently, oh okay, all

39:19

we have left is new boxes.

39:21

Well, the point is we... Classic

39:24

LTG store. Introduced that deal? Oh

39:26

boy, well hold on, there's got

39:28

to be more, right? Oh, there's

39:30

a used backpack between both of

39:33

you to show off. Well, we

39:35

should probably get this to the shipment

39:37

team so that they can put it

39:39

up for sale because apparently the rest

39:41

of them were sold out. Cool. The

39:44

least expensive tier apparently sold out really

39:46

fast followed by the like like new

39:48

tier the following day. Y'all blew us

39:50

away. We still have some new open

39:53

box ones available so you can save

39:55

about 70 bucks on a brand new

39:57

OGLT backpack. Here's a question. Just

39:59

note. These are OG backpacks

40:01

with either the old-style Caribbean

40:04

zipper or without Caribbeaners and

40:06

just regular YKK zips. Okay, sorry.

40:08

What is that, sir? It says boxless,

40:10

but I'm assuming it's still gonna

40:12

come in a box. I wouldn't

40:15

assume anything. Okay. It might come

40:17

in an envelope. Oh, really big one.

40:19

Wow. I don't know. I don't know. I'd be

40:21

impressed. I'm sure it'll get

40:23

there in one piece, and

40:25

if it doesn't contact support.

40:27

We also brought back mystery

40:29

screwdrivers. but with a twist. Basically

40:31

we're moving these screwdrivers so fast we don't

40:33

have time to pack them and also we're

40:36

in a hurry because tariffs because

40:38

we got to get them out before

40:40

May 2nd so we're giving you 20

40:42

bucks off if you buy a screwdriver

40:44

and included standard or knocked to a

40:46

bit set without the usual screwdriver box.

40:48

So that's what makes it mystery it

40:51

doesn't have a box. All mystery screwdrivers

40:53

will ship without a box. Look at that.

40:55

We don't have time to

40:57

pack these screwdrivers blah blah

40:59

blah also as a final

41:02

ship without a box. Possible

41:04

colorways are knocked to a beige

41:07

or knocked to a brown but

41:09

it is the same quality screwdriver.

41:11

Okay what else we got is

41:13

that is that it for? Is

41:16

that it for? Is that it

41:18

for? Big nerd gaming. Oh no.

41:20

We're pretty sure the guy on

41:23

the phone said beginner gaming.

41:25

But that's not as much fun

41:27

as what we thought he said. Big

41:29

nerd gaming. Which is big nerd gaming.

41:31

So we can click here and we

41:33

can see the design. I'm gonna be

41:35

big nerd gaming. Dude. Why is

41:37

Sarah such a Chad? Because this looks

41:40

awesome. Looks great. This looks so good.

41:42

We are ready to go. Well, we're

41:44

ready to go as soon as we

41:47

ship these out by June the 27th.

41:49

Yeah, all orders containing this are expected

41:51

to ship later. This is a print

41:54

to order shirt. But I'm super, super

41:56

exciting. I'm super excited. And finally,

41:58

oh my God. Oh. Oh my god. Cargo

42:01

pants are back in stock. Oh!

42:03

Cargo pants are back in stock!

42:05

Uh, yeah. So that's cool. Darn.

42:07

So we have different waist

42:09

sizes. We don't have another

42:11

end seam yet. So yeah, just the

42:14

one, I guess. Yes. I think at

42:16

some point we do want to add

42:18

another one, but still out of

42:20

luck for me. Just waist sizes for

42:22

now. We'll get there. Okay. I got

42:24

more shirts. I'm wearing one of my

42:27

new tall shirts now. I will get

42:29

pants eventually. With so many new deals

42:31

and items we've extended free shipping to

42:33

all orders over $150 until Monday, 10

42:35

a.m. Pacific time. This is likely going

42:38

to be the last time we can

42:40

extend this promotion since we need to

42:42

make sure that your orders get shipped

42:44

out and get over the border on

42:46

time. Make sure to take advantage of

42:49

these deals and the free shipping before

42:51

it's too late, especially if you're in

42:53

the US. You can find it all

42:55

at LTT store.com. Great work from the

42:57

team. Really pulled it together getting some

42:59

of these items Some of these restocks

43:01

up on the site. The big

43:04

nerd gaming was a Victor design

43:06

Was it? Oh, he did a great

43:08

job. Fantastic work. Oh, I I gave

43:10

credit to the wrong person. It was

43:12

so good. I thought Sarah did it

43:15

Wow, well that is a high

43:17

complement indeed Victor. It's good

43:19

stuff. You might call yourself

43:21

victorious Victoria's You

43:24

stole that from me? That's my

43:27

ding. You stole that from me?

43:29

All right. What are we supposed to

43:31

be doing now? I don't know.

43:34

I've had a merge message. Sure.

43:36

He's so sad. High deal. I'll

43:38

find like upgrade. We should explain

43:41

what merge messages are. Oh yeah.

43:43

I don't know what's going on.

43:46

I pirated your dig. No, because

43:48

I would still have it. You

43:50

stole it. No. You wouldn't download

43:53

a ding. merch messages whatever

43:55

just go on the store and in

43:58

the cart you can leave a merch

44:00

message, producer Dan will get it and

44:02

he will forward it to me and

44:04

Luke, or he will just not. It's

44:06

quite possible that he just won't. Yeah,

44:08

you get nothing. But you'll get your

44:10

order in the mail anyway. All right,

44:13

all right, hit me. Sure. High DLL.

44:15

I have finally upgraded my graphics card

44:17

from a GDX 970 to a 97XT.

44:19

Do you have any tips on an

44:21

open world game for single player? Best

44:23

regards from the middle of Sweden. It's

44:25

one Celsius outside. An

44:28

open world single player game. I

44:30

mean, okay. Sure, I'll bite. Play

44:32

freelancer. It's not gonna, it's

44:35

not gonna push your, not gonna

44:37

push your hardware, but it

44:39

is a great underrated game.

44:41

That's cool. I like that.

44:43

That completely runs out of gas

44:45

in the last 10% or so, because

44:48

they clearly ran out of budget. But

44:50

boy, is it a hell of a

44:52

ride up until that point. That's sick.

44:55

Super great answer. Super great

44:57

answer. Now we've got some

44:59

full plane announcements and a

45:02

couple others. And he's going

45:04

to say, how about oblivion

45:06

remastered? There you

45:09

go. Was that what you

45:11

were going to say? More

45:13

wind? Why not more wind

45:15

remastered? I don't know. If you

45:17

haven't played it before, it's

45:19

still good. Yeah, you could

45:21

do that. I think modern...

45:23

With the updates and stuff,

45:26

Cyberpunk is pretty sick. Try

45:28

that out. More announcement. Oh,

45:30

oh, just one? But no,

45:32

we can't do more announcements,

45:34

that's too many announcements, they

45:36

can't, announcements are like

45:38

half the doc, we're just gonna

45:40

have to come back to announcements

45:43

later. I think we're supposed to

45:45

do the flow plane one, we

45:47

can come back to the rest

45:49

of them later. Fine. If you're

45:51

a big nerd gamer. or a

45:54

beginner-gamer, get yourself an early screening

45:56

of Secret Shopper Part 2 on

45:58

float plane, which I am a... I'm about

46:00

to make live right now.

46:02

Why would we do this? I'm

46:04

about to make live right now.

46:07

No, no, no, no, no, don't,

46:09

don't, don't. It says don't

46:11

share your screen. It does?

46:13

Linus? Sorry. Please share

46:16

your screen. What? It says

46:18

share your screen. What?

46:20

It says to share my

46:22

screen and set the video

46:25

to public. Don't read this

46:27

out. Okay, this was supposed to

46:29

come out Sunday per our

46:31

48-hour early release advertisement However

46:33

beyond the editor and pluf

46:35

who owns a monitor that's

46:38

true pushed through and delivered

46:40

it for you guys now

46:42

Nice so be ahead of

46:44

the YouTube viewers as they have

46:46

to wait over 90 hours to watch

46:48

episode 2 Why did you want you

46:50

to share your screen when you do

46:52

things? I but I But are you

46:54

concerned about this? Yeah up

46:56

here Like why does that matter?

46:59

I just we've just never shared

47:01

this. It's probably fine. I've just

47:03

never thought about it or looked

47:05

at it Here's the float plane

47:07

CMS. I tried to cover it

47:09

with something and I was too

47:12

slow Just don't click anything else

47:14

do things here. How do things

47:16

here? How dare you? You want

47:18

me to click here? You want

47:20

me to click here? Yeah, just

47:22

don't how about legal agreement? No,

47:25

you want me to click there?

47:27

Joe says don't look. Yeah, there's

47:29

things you like everyone closed your

47:31

eyes. Things that would be a

47:33

major legal problem if you clicked

47:35

on them. I'm not going to

47:38

click those things. I know how

47:40

the CMS, Dan, give you my

47:42

CMS back. Okay, public. Boop. Why

47:44

take the risk? I don't know.

47:46

Life is about risk. Take risks

47:48

or be boring forever. That's

47:51

true. Boom. Save. Save. I

47:53

don't think that worked. Changes

47:56

saved? Oh, yeah, okay. Well, sure. You

47:58

don't upload things to the... Fullplane,

48:01

dude, I haven't done it in

48:03

forever. You know what? Haven't done

48:05

it in forever. Yeah. We added

48:07

the changes saved thing just because

48:09

people didn't trust us. Well, yeah.

48:12

It was you. Yeah, good. You

48:14

should. I want a fair feedback.

48:16

I want a confirmation that my

48:18

changes are saved. Nothing else is

48:20

good enough. I mean, if you

48:22

grade out the save. Then we

48:25

wouldn't have this problem because I

48:27

would click save and it would

48:29

stay great out. Yeah, but the

48:31

fade and then come back is

48:33

indicating that. No, but I haven't

48:36

changed anything. No, that's old. That's

48:38

old meta if that was ever

48:40

the meta. The current meta is

48:42

that I wouldn't be able to

48:44

save if I haven't made a

48:47

change. Yeah, things on the CMS

48:49

don't keep up with, does it

48:51

work? Yeah, people are saying it's

48:53

not live yet. It just went

48:55

live. Chewy says give it a

48:57

minute. Yeah, it just says give

49:00

it a minute. It's a global

49:02

thing. This is one of the

49:04

reasons why we don't want to

49:06

show. The same thing happens on

49:08

YouTube. Yeah. It's normal. Yeah, why

49:11

do you think 25 people type

49:13

first? Surely. If that other comment

49:15

was there, they would be smart

49:17

enough to not type first. Yeah.

49:19

But it doesn't show up for

49:21

them. Or they're dumb. Also not

49:24

everyone gets at the same time.

49:26

It has to... No, that's what

49:28

I'm saying. That's the... That's the

49:30

point. No, you said it doesn't

49:32

show up for them. Yeah. Oh,

49:35

I thought you meant the other

49:37

comments. Yeah. Because the other comments

49:39

also might just not show up.

49:41

Yeah. Because the comments and the

49:43

video are on different... He's all

49:46

cut up. He's all cut up.

49:48

Oh. We let people vote. We

49:50

let them buy the narcissist shirt

49:52

or the doesn't know shirt. I

49:54

wonder how many people would just

49:56

walk around with the narcissist shirt.

49:59

I feel like I'd have one

50:01

of those. I feel like if

50:03

like what's a brand that would

50:05

do this. What's some like really

50:07

expensive? Louis Vuitton would just have

50:10

a person just as a narcissist.

50:12

That's my point. I feel like

50:14

they would be an artist collab.

50:16

I feel like they might. There

50:18

is no way. But I feel

50:20

like it would be more like

50:23

a streetware brand. No way. Like

50:25

a streetware acts something collab where

50:27

it just said narcissist on it.

50:29

People are giving suggestions and float

50:31

plane shots. I don't know if

50:34

any of these are valid, but

50:36

they're saying supreme Blenciaga Blenciaga I

50:38

feel like would do it off

50:40

white Mark Jacob Be a microprint

50:42

and it would cost like a

50:45

thousand dollars a foot No, it

50:47

would just be made in China

50:49

and then they'll just tell everyone

50:51

that it costs a thousand dollars

50:53

already says Vetmos would do it.

50:55

I don't know. I don't know

50:58

any of who that is Because

51:00

I don't because I don't know

51:02

Nick owes you a email about

51:04

the shirts. Oh, does he? Yes.

51:06

Okay There's no way Kanye would

51:09

do it that would involve admitting

51:11

that he's a narciss I don't

51:13

think any actual What kind of

51:15

car would he drive, Luke? Why

51:17

don't you tell me? No, no,

51:19

don't tell me. Okay. That's no,

51:22

no, I could. Anyways, I think

51:24

we need merch messages. I think

51:26

we need merch messages. Yeah, hit

51:28

me with a merch message. Jeebus.

51:30

One more? I don't know. One

51:33

more. One more. Hello, LDL. Yeah.

51:35

Linus, how happy were you with

51:37

your Qualcommcom laptop? Need a new

51:39

laptop for traveling and light photo

51:41

and video and video processing. It

51:44

was okay. I'm actually not on

51:46

it right now. Man, it is

51:48

a dude. Did you check out

51:50

the framework short circuit by any

51:52

chance? No. So investment in framework

51:54

disclosure, the Dell that we used

51:57

as our battery life. comparison was

51:59

insane. No, but like, insane. Are

52:01

you checking it out right now?

52:03

I am. Okay, see if you

52:05

can find the battery life, see

52:08

if you can find the battery

52:10

life comparison. Uh, blah, blah, unboxing.

52:12

Yeah, dude, dude, dude, this is,

52:14

this actually blew my mind. for

52:16

whatever reason is a little unforgiving,

52:18

right? Like we always... Literally always

52:21

test lower than what the manufacturer

52:23

advertises. And that's fine as long

52:25

as our test is consistent. Yeah,

52:27

it raises serious questions for me

52:29

about what exactly it is that

52:32

manufacturers are testing because like there's

52:34

only so many things that you

52:36

can disable. We're already in battery

52:38

savor mode. We're already at 200

52:40

nip brightness. Like what are you

52:43

guys even doing? We're doing 10

52:45

AP playback the entire time. disable

52:47

your Bluetooth, disable your Wi-Fi. Come

52:49

on. What are you even talking

52:51

about here? They're probably trying to

52:53

simulate. A balanced workload. Anyway, the

52:56

point is we got it in

52:58

the chamber. We're doing battery-saver mode.

53:00

1080p playback overplex. 16 hours? That's

53:02

incredible. It's wild. Why would I

53:04

need a Qualcomm? That's a pretty

53:07

good point. Raises serious questions for

53:09

me. It's not that I didn't

53:11

like the Qualcomm. It's not that

53:13

I didn't enjoy my time with

53:15

the Snap Dragon X. It's just

53:18

that if, like, like, the... Are

53:20

the current gen Intel mobile chips

53:22

low-key really really really good? It's

53:24

a pro premium. How expensive is

53:26

this laptop? That one's really expensive.

53:28

Yeah, but a big part of

53:31

why that one is so efficient

53:33

is that one is so efficient

53:35

is that it's using that chip

53:37

and I think Dell also does

53:39

some really cool things with their

53:42

display for for our company efficiency.

53:44

These are not cheap. I mean

53:46

it's not dragon X is not

53:48

cheap either but that is more

53:50

expensive. That's like probably starting at

53:52

around 2200200 hundred bucks or something.

53:56

No. Dan, unless to do

53:58

more topic. Mike wasn't live,

54:00

so you're just crazy. That's

54:02

why I cut them up.

54:04

You're trying to take control

54:06

of so dead? It's my

54:08

job, Lou. Maybe the new

54:10

ear. Okay, what are we

54:12

supposed to be doing? Intel.

54:14

Speaking of Intel, they're having

54:16

a bit of a classic

54:18

Coke moment. Intel just dropped

54:20

a new 200-S boost bios

54:22

profile for their Aerolake CPUs,

54:24

like the Core Ultra 9-285K,

54:26

letting you safely overclock, without

54:28

killing your warranty. Early benchmarks

54:30

from DeBauer indicate that it

54:32

can boost gaming performance by

54:35

anywhere from 4 to 19

54:37

percent. But here's the twist.

54:39

For laptops, most people are

54:41

still buying older Raptor Lake

54:43

chips, 13th and 14th gen,

54:45

because they're cheaper, and on

54:47

the desktop, nobody seems to

54:49

give a hot gosh darn

54:51

about the limited AI uses

54:53

for the new chips, and

54:55

therefore the new chips at

54:57

all. I think that's for

54:59

laptops. Oh, for laptops. Why

55:01

are we talking about laptops?

55:03

For crying out loud. Okay,

55:05

well, whatever the point is

55:07

that no one's buying Intel's

55:09

latest chips Meanwhile CEO Lip

55:11

Bhutan announced undisclosed layoffs But

55:13

prior to that Bloomberg cited

55:15

internal sources claiming as much

55:17

as 20% of Intel's workforce

55:19

Could be laid off in

55:21

an effort to drive greater

55:23

simplicity amongst other sweeping cultural

55:25

changes at Intel Intel's also

55:27

facing unexpected production shortages for

55:29

its older Intel seven process

55:31

node as demand for these

55:33

more affordable chips continues to

55:35

be strong. 20% of the

55:37

workforce is like 20,000 jobs.

55:39

So, okay, some of the

55:41

stuff that I had kind

55:43

of put in, some of

55:45

the stuff that I had

55:47

put in maybe didn't make

55:49

it entirely into the doc,

55:51

but basically, yeah, the Intel,

55:53

oh yeah, right, right, right,

55:55

right, right, right. I remember

55:57

what I wanted to do.

55:59

So I wanted to go

56:01

on, you know, a site

56:03

like Amazon, top selling CPUs.

56:05

And C. How deep we

56:07

have to go in this

56:09

list to find anyone who's

56:11

buying these desktops? Top Core

56:14

Ultra 200 series chips. Is

56:16

anybody buying these things? Oh,

56:18

Crystal asked, what's a Coke

56:20

moment? A new Coke. Classic

56:22

New Coke. So back in,

56:24

I think it was the

56:26

80s, Coke released New Coke

56:28

and everyone hated it. And

56:30

then they got rid of

56:32

it. And they brought back

56:34

Coca-Cola Classic. That's why it

56:36

says classic, because that's just

56:38

like what it was before

56:40

or something, but also of

56:42

corn syrup now. So I

56:44

don't know, whatever. The point

56:46

is Coke Classic, and then

56:48

sales skyrocketed. So there's like

56:50

kind of a conspiracy theory

56:52

that they made new Coke

56:54

suck on purpose so that

56:56

they could increase sales of

56:58

Coke classic. I'm not sure

57:00

if I subscribe to that.

57:02

But, uh... That's... It feels

57:04

like, uh, 17D chess. I

57:06

don't know. Now apparently Newcoke

57:08

was terrible. I never tried

57:10

it. It was dramatically risk

57:12

the entire company for a

57:14

crazy move. Okay, so here

57:16

we go. We finally reached

57:18

an Intel chip at number

57:20

eight. It is a 12th

57:22

gen at number nine. We

57:24

have another Intel chip a

57:26

14th gen processor. More rise

57:28

and more rise in we

57:30

have a 13th gen at

57:32

number 14th place. We have

57:34

a 14th gen at 16th.

57:36

We have a 14th gen

57:38

at 18th Okay, we're right

57:40

number 25 is a micro

57:42

tick switch of some sort

57:44

Core ultra seven two six

57:46

five K at 29th place

57:48

to be clear. They're still

57:50

selling a few of these

57:53

things. It's got a hundred

57:55

and eighty eight reviews which

57:57

is something but when we

57:59

compare that to you know,

58:01

like the 1,200F, a chip

58:03

that clearly, you know, used

58:05

to be a little higher

58:07

with 1400 reviews. Yeah, it's

58:09

not a lot. It's not

58:11

a lot folks. A hundred

58:13

reviews on the coral for

58:15

9-285-K, just 37 on the

58:17

245-K. Clearly people do not

58:19

care about these things. Thousands.

58:21

A lot of MD at

58:23

the top. On chips that

58:25

people actually buy, like the

58:27

7800X3D. Like here, let's find

58:29

something. Oh, wow, this is

58:31

embarrassing. The 9950X. Okay, this

58:33

is an almost $800. Intel's

58:35

current-gen, like, value gaming chip,

58:37

the 265K. It's not even

58:39

close. That's embarrassing. More, more

58:41

performance, you know, with, you

58:43

know, overclocking or whatever, Bios

58:45

Boost, 200-S boost profile. Great,

58:47

but it just doesn't, it

58:49

doesn't seem like enough. It

58:51

seems like arrow-like is just.

58:53

Dead in the water at

58:55

this point. We're on the

58:57

we're on the US site

58:59

Or I think so wait

59:01

did it go to dot

59:03

C8. I hate it when

59:05

it does that Forces you

59:07

hate it when it does

59:09

that. Yeah No, that was

59:11

this was my fault. I

59:13

clicked the wrong thing I

59:15

did click a dot C.

59:17

A link. That's my bad.

59:19

Well anyway still my point

59:21

stands all right sucks to

59:23

suck Noke asks,

59:26

do you think the ultra-CPUs were

59:28

made on purpose for laptops, but

59:30

had to release them as desktop

59:32

variants to satisfy a quota of

59:34

some sort? I mean, that's basically,

59:37

as far as I can tell,

59:39

been what's driven Intel's CPU development

59:41

since they released, like, core. And

59:43

that was back in, like, the

59:45

mid-2000s, was they recognized that power

59:48

efficiency was going to matter a

59:50

lot, and then the only times

59:52

that they have sort of deviated

59:54

from that are when they like

59:56

sucked. and had to had to

59:59

juice up power just to get

1:00:01

performance decent. They've been very mobile

1:00:03

first for 20 years. Oh yeah,

1:00:05

definitely. Don't forget about server, but

1:00:08

that's the funny thing is like

1:00:10

enthusiast desktop is this one kind

1:00:12

of little island of not caring

1:00:14

about power consumption in a sea

1:00:16

of server, of server caring about

1:00:19

per core power consumption a lot

1:00:21

and mobile caring about per core

1:00:23

power consumption a lot. So we

1:00:25

just get whatever's kind of left

1:00:27

over. We're also

1:00:29

like the worst market for them out

1:00:32

of those three probably unfortunately. Oh yeah

1:00:34

the most vocal and cranky and least

1:00:36

loyal like you look at mobile and

1:00:39

enterprise right like they just have regular

1:00:41

hardware refreshes that they just they just

1:00:43

buy and they don't feel like validating

1:00:45

another vendor I mean that's how Intel

1:00:48

has managed to be behind in in

1:00:50

server performance for years at this point

1:00:52

but still maintain greater than 50% market

1:00:55

share until I think it was just

1:00:57

like one quarter ago or something like

1:00:59

that. There's more to it than just

1:01:01

that but a big part of it

1:01:04

is once you're bought into an ecosystem

1:01:06

you just you just reorder it you

1:01:08

just get the new one. Well good

1:01:11

luck Intel. Crow

1:01:13

might be for sale. Yeah,

1:01:15

and I don't know if

1:01:17

I love the list of

1:01:19

people on the buyers. Where's

1:01:21

our article for this? That's

1:01:23

the top. Since

1:01:25

Google was ruled a search monopoly

1:01:28

in last August, the Department of

1:01:30

Justice is now seeking a plethora

1:01:32

of penalties, including forcing Google to

1:01:34

sell Chrome. Open AI is 100%

1:01:36

interested in the browser, promising an

1:01:38

AI first experience that... editorialization on

1:01:40

the side. We all definitely want

1:01:42

everyone wants that people have been

1:01:44

begging for that. I love how

1:01:46

when I click in a Google

1:01:48

Doc and I just try to

1:01:50

position my cursor at the top

1:01:53

it opens up AI bullshit. It's

1:01:55

like hey can I help you?

1:01:57

with this oh wow yeah I

1:01:59

mean that one everybody gets one

1:02:01

right how could you possibly help

1:02:03

me with this I haven't started

1:02:05

typing yet it's a document it's

1:02:07

not even a response to an

1:02:09

email it's a document we're all

1:02:11

we're all super excited about this

1:02:13

thank you very much open aye

1:02:15

I think actually this would be

1:02:18

great if you did this please

1:02:20

actually you know what Maybe it's

1:02:22

good if they do. Because then

1:02:24

other browsers might do it. Hold

1:02:26

on, hold on, hold on, maybe

1:02:28

it doesn't do it in the

1:02:30

document. Maybe it only does it

1:02:32

in emails. I'm pretty sure it

1:02:34

does it in the document. I

1:02:36

swear it does too. Maybe there

1:02:38

needs to be content already in

1:02:40

the document. Is it just because

1:02:42

we're on G-sweet? No, it does

1:02:45

it for my Google sheets as

1:02:47

well. Yeah, it doesn't in the

1:02:49

document in there yet or anything,

1:02:51

I'm not sure. But anyways, maybe

1:02:53

they do this and then everyone

1:02:55

hates it and other people use

1:02:57

other browsers and that might be

1:02:59

good for the world or something,

1:03:01

we'll see. But anyways, there are

1:03:03

hopes that interested in the browser.

1:03:05

No, no, no. Yeah, I have,

1:03:07

uh, I have helped me write

1:03:10

and generate document, they show up

1:03:12

right at the top. When I

1:03:14

have entered, nothing into this document

1:03:16

yet. Because that's what bothers me.

1:03:18

I'm not entered. anything in the

1:03:20

document yet. Yeah. What could you

1:03:22

possibly be hoping to auto complete?

1:03:24

Generate document, help me write, templates,

1:03:26

and more. To be fair, I

1:03:28

can generate a document. No, I'm

1:03:30

going to generate document. Generate document.

1:03:32

Yeah, it's a wizard. That's why

1:03:35

it's able to help. Oh, well

1:03:37

I hate it. Because it's supposed

1:03:39

to help people with writers block.

1:03:41

That's why it's still there, even

1:03:43

if there's nothing else. But they

1:03:45

already have the templates button. The

1:03:47

thing that drives me nuts is...

1:03:49

No, this is stupid. No, I've

1:03:51

maintained it's stupid. Generate document, asks

1:03:53

me if I want to do,

1:03:55

what, party planning? Hold on, what's

1:03:57

that? Do I want to do

1:04:00

party planning? A newsletter. It doesn't

1:04:02

just stop there. To launch new

1:04:04

strawberry and matcha. Meeting notes, account

1:04:06

plan, blog post, business proposal? They're

1:04:08

different things! I don't like it

1:04:10

either, but they're different things. The

1:04:12

thing that drives me nuts is

1:04:14

that all those options are in

1:04:16

line with your cursor at the

1:04:18

top of the screen. Oh yeah,

1:04:20

so I can't click. Get out

1:04:22

of the way. It's so annoying.

1:04:24

Anyway, like I don't even mind,

1:04:27

I don't even mind this up

1:04:29

here. Yeah, that's fine. Like fine,

1:04:31

whatever, be there. But, oh, you

1:04:33

know what, that's probably it. I

1:04:35

just don't have it activated. There

1:04:37

we go, that's the problem. Oh

1:04:39

God, you're gonna make me pay...

1:04:41

Yeah, right. Yeah, right. Yeah, I

1:04:43

mean, I do pay for it.

1:04:45

Pay for it. Pay for it.

1:04:47

Pay for it on my stupid

1:04:49

work account. Do we have to

1:04:52

keep G-sweet forever? You know, Luke

1:04:54

interacts with sales employees at large

1:04:56

companies at a moment. We had

1:04:58

some back and forths and they

1:05:00

didn't give us as much of

1:05:02

a discount on our G suite

1:05:04

thing as we had last year

1:05:06

because they were really trying to

1:05:08

push us to pay for the

1:05:10

AI thing, but we did not

1:05:12

pay for AI tools. And

1:05:15

I based they were very pushy

1:05:17

about why and I told them

1:05:20

And we're good They were pushy

1:05:22

about why they're so helpful. Why

1:05:24

don't you want the AI tools?

1:05:26

Oh because I'm trash them trash.

1:05:29

They're so bad Like it's not

1:05:31

even like so bad. They're in

1:05:33

the way. Yeah, they're I am

1:05:36

trying to get work done They're

1:05:38

invasive, they're often not helpful yet,

1:05:40

blah, blah, blah, blah. Maybe it's

1:05:43

a thing in the future, but

1:05:45

it's not right now. And it's

1:05:47

really expensive per employee. So like,

1:05:49

getting the actual value out of

1:05:52

that when there are so many

1:05:54

free tools out there that take

1:05:56

almost no additional lift? And in

1:05:59

a lot of cases better. Yeah.

1:06:01

Gemini's doing well right now, but

1:06:03

I mean... the whoever's winning the

1:06:05

race is is constantly changing. Anyways,

1:06:08

Open AI is interested in buying

1:06:10

Chrome. They also, they, they, they,

1:06:12

they even just buy access to

1:06:15

Google search index with an exact

1:06:17

stating in an email that was

1:06:19

revealed in the trial. We believe

1:06:21

having multiple partners and in particular

1:06:24

Google's API would enable us to

1:06:26

provide a better product to users.

1:06:28

Open AI has reportedly considered buying

1:06:31

its own chromium-based browser, hiring former

1:06:33

Google developers Ben Goodger. Oh, wow.

1:06:35

And Darren Fisher, who helped to

1:06:37

bring chrome to market. Yahoo? Of

1:06:40

course, why not? Yeah, who still

1:06:42

exists. How does Yahoo still exist?

1:06:44

I don't understand. I feel like

1:06:47

that'll be a wild company to

1:06:49

work for. Every once in a

1:06:51

while, every once in a while,

1:06:53

I end up on like Yahoo

1:06:56

Finance because I need to see

1:06:58

like, like the history for a

1:07:00

particular stock ticket or whatever, yeah.

1:07:03

Who is using Yahoo? I don't

1:07:05

know. Yeah, see someone said Yahoo

1:07:07

Finance is great. Yeah, it's like

1:07:09

the one thing people see. I

1:07:12

still have Yahoo email. My dad

1:07:14

uses their email. Anytime I see

1:07:16

anyone with a Yahoo email. I

1:07:19

have a really strong like throwback

1:07:21

moment. Like wow, like you really,

1:07:23

you just have really just dealt

1:07:26

with that for a long time,

1:07:28

haven't you? Like dang. That's not

1:07:30

what you were going to say

1:07:32

at all. We all know what

1:07:34

you were going to say. No,

1:07:36

they're a very strong person. We

1:07:38

all know what you were going

1:07:41

to say. Why don't you just

1:07:43

say it? They considered the impact

1:07:45

on everyone in their life. If

1:07:47

they changed emails and how they

1:07:49

might be harder to contact, so

1:07:51

they just stuck through it and

1:07:53

kept using it. It's good. Very

1:07:55

strong person. I'm impressed. Tears streaming

1:07:58

down their face. Anyways, Yahoo's looking

1:08:00

to run its own browser. because

1:08:02

why not, either through developing or

1:08:04

buying one, Yahoo Search General Manager

1:08:06

Brian Prof's estimated Yahoo's search market

1:08:08

share could jump from 3% to

1:08:10

double digits if they're able to

1:08:13

buy Chrome. Wow, double digits. I

1:08:15

would hope. Also, Yahoo estimating that

1:08:17

they have 3% market share seems

1:08:19

stunning to me. We're going to

1:08:21

use the Chrome browser to advantage

1:08:23

our own search product exactly the

1:08:25

same way that Google's doing it.

1:08:27

Am I missing something here? I'm

1:08:30

sure I'm missing something here. Wasn't

1:08:32

there a South Park episode about

1:08:34

this? Walmart, Jim's drugs? It's just

1:08:36

going to happen to Yahoo. Honestly,

1:08:38

also, Yahoo estimating that they have

1:08:40

3% market share seems stunning to

1:08:42

me. I don't know if that's

1:08:45

true. Because it doesn't Japan, these

1:08:47

Yahoo or something. I forgot that

1:08:49

might be a thing. Handyman says

1:08:51

Google is a monopoly, others are

1:08:53

not. But the thing is that

1:08:55

like the same behaviors that turn

1:08:57

you into a monopoly. Are like

1:08:59

just as wrong when you're not

1:09:02

the monopoly but while you're building

1:09:04

toward being a monopoly? That's like

1:09:06

kind of the whole idea of

1:09:08

antitrust There's been a little talk

1:09:10

of spinning off chrome into its

1:09:12

own independent company as Google has

1:09:14

contended that chrome can't survive on

1:09:17

its own Sorry, there's been little

1:09:19

talk not there has been a

1:09:21

little talk perplexity Actually agrees and

1:09:23

would rather Google keep chrome instead

1:09:25

of being forced to sell it

1:09:27

to another company like open AI

1:09:29

Perplexity is a competitor to open

1:09:31

AI just to be clear. However

1:09:34

if a sale is forced Perplexity

1:09:36

would like would be down to

1:09:38

buy chrome as well Obviously, they

1:09:40

probably just don't have the I'd

1:09:42

be down to buy chrome if

1:09:44

I could afford it. We should

1:09:46

get we should get all YouTubeers

1:09:49

together We can make our own

1:09:51

browser if you want and buy

1:09:53

chrome surprisingly easy. We should just

1:09:55

buy chrome nice Why

1:09:58

if everyone One of our

1:10:00

viewers contributed $1. YouTubeers could

1:10:02

buy Chrome from Google and

1:10:04

then we could own Chrome.

1:10:07

Why? Because Chrome is what

1:10:09

you use to watch YouTube.

1:10:11

Okay, but you can watch

1:10:13

on other browsers. If you

1:10:15

are a dinosaur and you're

1:10:17

not already watching on your

1:10:19

phone or your TV or...

1:10:21

Firefox. Yeah, that's true. Well

1:10:24

people don't watch YouTube on

1:10:26

Firefox. They watch float plane

1:10:28

on Firefox. So we'd only

1:10:30

be buying it for like

1:10:32

millennials that are still using

1:10:34

computers. Yeah. To buy their

1:10:36

airplane tickets. No, that's

1:10:38

a thing. No, I agree. Yeah, that's

1:10:40

a thing. I do not make me

1:10:42

buy airplane tickets on a phone, dude.

1:10:44

No, I can't. I will go on

1:10:46

a computer. I can't. We were shopping

1:10:48

for Yvonne's getting a new car. Big

1:10:50

purchases need big screen. We were shopping

1:10:52

for it, and I was trying to

1:10:54

look at it on the phone, and

1:10:56

it's fine, but I can't compare. Yeah.

1:10:58

I need to compare. So we ended

1:11:00

up at her desktop, the nice big

1:11:02

ultra-wide monitor, with the spreadsheet, with all

1:11:04

the links. You were talking earlier in

1:11:06

the show about how Gen Z is

1:11:08

much more gullible. Is this part of

1:11:10

why? The tools that they'd have don't

1:11:12

naturally lend themselves to like comparisons. And

1:11:14

they're not, maybe they're just not accustomed

1:11:17

to making comparisons. I could kind of,

1:11:19

I could kind of see that. Like

1:11:21

the friction to make a comparison on

1:11:23

desktop? I mean, we've had arrow snap

1:11:25

on Windows for like 20 years or

1:11:27

whatever, right? The computer almost wants you

1:11:29

to do it. Yeah, you just, you

1:11:31

take your one thing and you throw

1:11:33

it on the one side, you take

1:11:35

your other thing, you throw it on

1:11:37

the other side. And you're just like,

1:11:39

yeah. And you make comparisons, whereas phones.

1:11:41

No, it sucks. Yeah. Sam on decks.

1:11:43

Oh, come on. That's a very high

1:11:45

friction to go. take your phone somewhere

1:11:47

and plug it into something and yeah

1:11:49

I mean I'm not being serious I

1:11:51

see I so you should be serious

1:11:53

about our sponsors yeah BDB B99 split

1:11:55

screen on a phone is awful it

1:11:57

really is like let's try it it's

1:11:59

one of those things that I basically

1:12:01

ignored any time I was reviewing a

1:12:03

phone yeah it's I just don't use

1:12:05

it like what I want an even

1:12:07

smaller screen you gotta be kidding me

1:12:09

cool I can look at the tire

1:12:11

on this one car and the tire

1:12:13

on this other car and compare it

1:12:15

that that that way now I think

1:12:17

that's actually a pretty good point Yeah,

1:12:20

and like no ad ados in

1:12:22

float plane chat says no, they're

1:12:24

just lazy people don't want to

1:12:26

self-educate anymore I don't think that's

1:12:28

it I think they think they

1:12:30

are self-educating so we're trying to

1:12:32

figure out like what is the

1:12:34

Like you've identified the disease, but

1:12:36

we're trying to figure out like

1:12:38

you know what infected them. Yeah,

1:12:40

like where did this disease come

1:12:42

from? Why? Apparently there is decks

1:12:44

wireless. Okay, you could do that

1:12:46

but You're still just sitting at

1:12:48

a computer. It's not the point.

1:12:50

And the habit, the habit, of

1:12:52

whenever you do things, hold on.

1:12:54

I'm sorry. The issue is that

1:12:56

they don't have the habit of

1:12:58

going and sitting down at a

1:13:00

computer to do something. So they're

1:13:02

not going to do that regardless

1:13:04

of whether it's sitting down at

1:13:06

Samsung decks or sitting down at

1:13:08

a gaming desktop or whatever else.

1:13:10

It's just that that was our

1:13:12

habit. When we needed to do

1:13:14

something online, we would go to

1:13:16

the computer. I can buy things

1:13:18

online and I will, if I'm

1:13:20

just grabbing some like hooks for

1:13:22

my wall to hang things in

1:13:24

my garage, whatever, I'll just like

1:13:26

go, I'll just find the first

1:13:28

thing because it doesn't make much

1:13:30

of a difference if I pay

1:13:32

$3 for it or. $5. Like

1:13:34

yeah, and one of them I'm

1:13:36

paying 66% more, but I don't

1:13:38

I don't care. I'm making a

1:13:41

quick decision Okay, I found this

1:13:43

it ships into okay, boom done

1:13:45

Google pay done Right, but for

1:13:47

something like you said flights vehicles

1:13:49

houses I'm at my desktop. I

1:13:51

got to be and that's just

1:13:53

like not a thing for the

1:13:55

younger the younger generation apparently So

1:13:57

good luck on your sale of

1:13:59

chrome Google Our

1:14:02

discussion question, is consumer welfare really

1:14:04

the best lens to look at

1:14:06

antitrust through if breaking up Google

1:14:08

only results in different bazillion dollar

1:14:10

companies turning surveillance capitalism up to

1:14:13

11? Yeah, it's interesting that it's

1:14:15

like an extremely ethically gray AI

1:14:17

companies and Yahoo for some reason

1:14:19

are the only ones seemingly jumping

1:14:21

on this. Yeah, who would want

1:14:23

to own all your browsing data

1:14:26

other than someone who wants to

1:14:28

capitalize on it, right? Like there's

1:14:30

no good guy is going to

1:14:32

want Chrome. Yeah, you're not going

1:14:34

to make a pricing model for

1:14:36

Chrome itself. Like that was my

1:14:39

point with the YouTubers buying it

1:14:41

and being like, why? And that's

1:14:43

exactly it. Why? There's no reason

1:14:45

unless you just want to own

1:14:47

the internet and own internet standards

1:14:50

and all of that. Yeah. What

1:14:52

are we supposed to be doing

1:14:54

right now Mr. Dan? Oh sponsors!

1:14:56

The show is brought to you

1:14:58

by Dennis. Oh Vessie! I wear

1:15:00

sandals all the time. But our

1:15:03

sponsor Vessie wasn't having it. So

1:15:05

they sent Dennis to my house

1:15:07

to uncover the truth behind my

1:15:09

sandal obsession. It took him over

1:15:11

20 seconds to put on my

1:15:14

sandals. Meanwhile, he can slip right

1:15:16

into a pair of vessies. Maybe

1:15:18

the sandals can keep your socks

1:15:20

dry? Nope. Another point for Vessie.

1:15:22

Style? Well here I think the

1:15:24

winner's obvious. Vessie has all kinds

1:15:27

of styles. Sneakers, slip-ons, boots, and

1:15:29

more. Oh, and their weekend sneakers?

1:15:31

Dennis's favorite travel shoes. He's worn

1:15:33

them everywhere from strolling through Thailand

1:15:35

to racking up 20,000 steps a

1:15:37

day in Tokyo. With a thicker

1:15:40

cushioned midstle and a relaxed fit,

1:15:42

they'll have your feet feeling like

1:15:44

it's the weekend all year round.

1:15:46

Visit vessie.com/wannshow for 15% off your

1:15:48

first pair at checkout and start

1:15:51

exploring with confidence. The show was

1:15:53

also brought to you by Squarespace.

1:15:55

You don't have to be Mr.

1:15:57

Leather Jacket to build something. That's

1:15:59

amazing. Our sponsor Squarespace gives you

1:16:01

the tools to make launching a

1:16:04

business a breeze, even if it's

1:16:06

just your side hustle. Instead of

1:16:08

dragging your feet on coding a

1:16:10

site, you can literally drag and

1:16:12

drop the designs with our sponsor

1:16:15

Squarespace. Squarespace is an all-in-one website

1:16:17

platform. You can set up invoicing,

1:16:19

marketing, scheduling, and more. And you

1:16:21

can even check out their new

1:16:23

AI website builder. It helps to

1:16:25

simplify your design process by providing

1:16:28

custom design suggestions, text and images.

1:16:30

And they have tons of beautiful

1:16:32

layouts and styling options. So you

1:16:34

can always find one that fits

1:16:36

your needs and will look great

1:16:38

on any device. They also support

1:16:41

all major credit cards and many

1:16:43

other popular payment methods. It's so

1:16:45

easy. We built our website on

1:16:47

Squarespace, too. On this Media group.com,

1:16:49

there it is. Look at that.

1:16:52

So start building your site today

1:16:54

and get 10% off your first

1:16:56

purchase by visiting squarespace.com/When. Finally,

1:16:58

the show is brought you by

1:17:01

notion. Is your chief of vision

1:17:03

not seeing what you're seeing? Okay.

1:17:05

Our sponsor notion keeps your work

1:17:07

docs organized and in sight so

1:17:09

you're never short on clarity. Notion

1:17:11

combines your notes, docs, and projects

1:17:14

into one space that's simple and

1:17:16

beautifully designed. It's the place to

1:17:18

connect teams so you're always on

1:17:20

the same page. The fully integrated

1:17:22

Notion AI assistant helps you work

1:17:25

faster, write better, and think bigger,

1:17:27

doing tasks that normally take you

1:17:29

hours in just seconds. You can

1:17:31

even automate tedious tasks like summarizing

1:17:33

meeting notes or getting insights from

1:17:35

PDFs and images. with notion you

1:17:38

don't need to bounce between six

1:17:40

different apps it's seamlessly integrated with

1:17:42

google drive slack get hub and

1:17:44

more notion is used by over

1:17:46

half of fortune 500 companies helping

1:17:48

teams stay on the same page

1:17:51

by reducing emails cutting unnecessary meetings

1:17:53

saving time searching for work and

1:17:55

lowering costs on extra tools try

1:17:57

notion for free when you go

1:17:59

to notion.com/when that's all lower case

1:18:02

letters notion.com/to try the powerful and

1:18:04

easy to use notion. It also

1:18:06

isn't all over case because like

1:18:08

it would also just work if

1:18:10

it wasn't right? So there's that.

1:18:12

I don't know why they asked

1:18:15

me to clarify that. It's been

1:18:17

a very long time I think

1:18:19

since any browser has been case

1:18:21

sensitive. Yeah. What else do you

1:18:23

want to talk about? You want

1:18:25

to talk about oblivion? Or did

1:18:28

you kind of already? Or like,

1:18:30

what's your delio there? We can.

1:18:32

There's more announcements. How do we

1:18:34

want to deal with that? Yeah,

1:18:36

why not? Oh, no. We already...

1:18:39

Guys, we have to do actual

1:18:41

topics at some point. Why are

1:18:43

you pressuring me? Let's talk about

1:18:45

oblivion then. Okay, I have to

1:18:47

be. Where's the... Bethesda

1:18:50

Shadow drops the oblivion

1:18:52

remaster and everyone liked

1:18:54

that. Kind of. There's

1:18:56

some sources here from

1:18:58

Gainesville and Peezy Gamer.

1:19:00

A lot of places

1:19:02

have talked about this.

1:19:04

The notes say, like

1:19:06

an arrow to the

1:19:08

knee of my free

1:19:10

time, the oblivion remaster

1:19:12

was announced and released

1:19:14

with one trailer. and

1:19:16

two game engines, which

1:19:19

I'll explain in a

1:19:21

moment. It got over

1:19:23

150,000 concurrent players on

1:19:25

steam on the first

1:19:27

day despite having effectively

1:19:29

no advertising, and also

1:19:31

despite the fact that

1:19:33

it is free on

1:19:35

game pass. Red at

1:19:37

slash our slash oblivion

1:19:39

abominations has gone wild

1:19:41

with all of the

1:19:43

characters that people are

1:19:45

making. Oh yes, oblivion

1:19:47

character creators is fantastic.

1:19:49

Wow. Someone made pot

1:19:51

of greed. Oh, boy.

1:19:53

Oh, man. Oh, nice.

1:19:55

Squidward. Let's go. Oh.

1:19:57

Anyways. Good stuff. Oblivion's

1:19:59

great. free keys to

1:20:01

the entire Sky Bolivian

1:20:03

dev team. It's doesn't

1:20:05

here to make them

1:20:07

feel a little less

1:20:09

sad about wasting years

1:20:11

of their lives. Oh

1:20:13

my god. Many, many

1:20:15

years of their lives.

1:20:17

Also, someone posted this,

1:20:19

which honestly, I didn't.

1:20:23

I might this weekend, but I

1:20:25

didn't. The first thing, the literal

1:20:27

first thing that I heard about

1:20:29

it, that wasn't just a rumor,

1:20:31

was that NPCs didn't have schedules

1:20:33

anymore. And what I really liked

1:20:35

back in the day was being

1:20:37

a sneaky little thief guy and

1:20:39

stealing everything. And my favorite quest

1:20:42

chains were the Dark Brotherhood and

1:20:44

the Thieves Guild. And by far

1:20:46

my favorite quest chain in a

1:20:48

morrowand was, in regards to the

1:20:50

factions, was the Thieves Guild. Without

1:20:52

schedules I was like what the

1:20:54

heck and then somebody corrected that

1:20:56

for me and apparently they do

1:20:58

have schedules So I don't know

1:21:00

where that rumor came from because

1:21:03

I Once I first heard that

1:21:05

I looked it up and found

1:21:07

it quite a few people saying

1:21:09

it But they do seem to

1:21:11

have schedules. I think the confusion

1:21:13

there might be tied into that

1:21:15

one trailer two engines comment that

1:21:17

was made because the ue five

1:21:19

engine is Just dealing with the

1:21:21

graphics the game logic is still

1:21:24

being ran by What is it

1:21:26

called game Brio? I think it's

1:21:28

game Brio the the engine that

1:21:30

was originally used for oblivion which

1:21:32

has created in my opinion a

1:21:34

pretty fantastic result actually because I

1:21:36

was very standoffish I first of

1:21:38

all I was I'm Even with

1:21:40

it being out now and now

1:21:42

I do own it I was

1:21:45

much more interested in and still

1:21:47

am much more interested in the

1:21:49

Skyblivian project that's still coming this

1:21:51

year. And I'll probably be diving

1:21:53

in more so to that. I'm

1:21:55

gonna dabble with this remaster, but

1:21:57

I don't know if I'm gonna

1:21:59

like fully try to beat the

1:22:01

game or anything. And I'll. I'll

1:22:03

be more interested in the Skyblivian

1:22:06

remaster. But yeah, there was a

1:22:08

bunch of things that put me

1:22:10

off. There's the schedules thing. I

1:22:12

heard that in the Yula, they

1:22:14

talked down on mods, but apparently

1:22:16

they're not against mods at all.

1:22:18

And Nexus mods, I believe, already

1:22:20

has like... I think Berington was

1:22:22

saying last night that they already

1:22:24

have like hundreds of mods for

1:22:27

the game and it's been out

1:22:29

for days. I've heard a lot

1:22:31

of them are Dragon Drop because

1:22:33

it's the same like core engine

1:22:35

in a way. That makes so

1:22:37

much sense. So it should be

1:22:39

a little more approachable than something

1:22:41

like I think SE took a

1:22:43

while to get in because it

1:22:45

was slightly different and then... Skyram

1:22:48

VR also was very difficult if

1:22:50

I remember. Yeah, so there's 529

1:22:52

mods already, which is pretty wild.

1:22:54

And there's some things that is

1:22:56

like kind of broken, like I

1:22:58

couldn't go to 1440P. Oh, I

1:23:00

already clicked away from it. And

1:23:02

now it's on steak? Why are

1:23:04

you on steak? I must have

1:23:06

clicked an ad. I thought you're

1:23:09

a vegetarian. Gambling vegetarian. I

1:23:12

eat right, I eat unknown mushrooms

1:23:14

or something. Anyways, yeah, but apparently

1:23:16

there's like an I&I fix that

1:23:18

you can use to solve that

1:23:20

and stuff. But anyways, it seems

1:23:22

cool and something that I really

1:23:24

appreciate about it is that it

1:23:26

has the same quirks that it

1:23:28

used to have because the underlying

1:23:30

engine is still gamebrio, despite UE5

1:23:32

taking over the visualization stuff. There's

1:23:34

some funk on like how... the

1:23:36

color palette and lighting works is

1:23:38

different and more tame than the

1:23:40

original oblivion because the original oblivion

1:23:43

was like bloom everywhere and everything's

1:23:45

glowing all the time so if

1:23:47

you want that back you can

1:23:49

mod that back in I think

1:23:51

the game probably looks better I've

1:23:53

watched more than just my hands

1:23:55

I washed my whole arm here

1:23:57

check out you did yep Why?

1:24:00

Cool. But yeah, it seems it

1:24:02

seems cool. I am still more

1:24:04

interested in Sky Bolivian and I

1:24:06

recommend that you guys still look

1:24:09

forward towards that project and maybe

1:24:11

don't tap yourself out on the

1:24:13

remaster because Skyblivian in my opinion

1:24:15

just looks better. That team is

1:24:17

being very gracious right now, I

1:24:19

think. They've made multiple posts. Thank

1:24:21

you for not shutting down our

1:24:23

project that we've been working on

1:24:25

for years. We will never make

1:24:27

fun of your games again, even

1:24:29

though they are trash. Well, they

1:24:31

used to be good. This one

1:24:33

was. Some of the newer ones

1:24:35

are not as good, but thank

1:24:38

you so much. Also, are you

1:24:40

ever going to do a new

1:24:42

Elder Scrolls game? Remaking of Living

1:24:44

doesn't really count. That's what we

1:24:46

were doing. They did have an

1:24:48

outside studio did the work on

1:24:50

this virtuous. I think it's virtuous.

1:24:52

Linus found a quarter in the

1:24:54

toilet. Something like that. That would

1:24:56

be a great reason. But yeah,

1:24:58

I don't know. It's cool. I

1:25:00

think there's a lot of people

1:25:02

going with the like, this is

1:25:04

an example of how new games

1:25:07

suck now. And I mean, oblivion

1:25:09

kind of sucks. It's literally the

1:25:11

original horse armor. It is the

1:25:13

original. There's new horse armor. Oh,

1:25:15

that was the other reason why

1:25:17

I didn't exactly want to jump

1:25:19

on it right away. Was that

1:25:21

they sold horse armor again. I

1:25:23

don't know. Did you see this?

1:25:25

No. Oh, Libyan remastered. So if

1:25:27

you look at the steam page.

1:25:29

Oh, hold on. Whoop. This is

1:25:31

not lying. Let's go. If you

1:25:33

go to the steam page and

1:25:36

you scroll down, they make it

1:25:38

look like the deluxe edition. is

1:25:40

needed for the expansions. Oh, interesting.

1:25:42

Because you go up here and

1:25:44

you're, okay, I'm buying Oblivion Remastered.

1:25:46

Yeah. I scroll down. It doesn't

1:25:48

say up here, like, oh, it

1:25:50

includes the expansions by the way.

1:25:52

By the deluxe. Oh my god,

1:25:54

they want these two options. 50

1:25:56

US dollars for this game. It's

1:25:58

a lot. Or is it less

1:26:00

than that? Is it 40? I

1:26:02

think it's less than that. 45?

1:26:05

I don't know, whatever it is.

1:26:07

Either way. You scroll down, you

1:26:09

see this, and this is the

1:26:11

first time that I saw Shivering

1:26:13

Isles and Knights of the Nine.

1:26:15

I have to buy horse armor

1:26:17

effectively. Glarias. That sucks. So I

1:26:19

refused to buy it originally, because

1:26:21

I was just like, there's no

1:26:23

way. I'm not doing that. No

1:26:25

chance. Turns out the base game

1:26:27

does have the expansions, but a

1:26:29

ton of people didn't even know

1:26:32

that, because this is super misleading.

1:26:34

So bought the deluxe edition, effectively

1:26:36

just buying some armor, some weapons,

1:26:38

and horse armor, along with an

1:26:40

art book and a soundtrack. Technically

1:26:42

what they're saying is true. does

1:26:44

include the expansions yeah it does

1:26:46

so this is they just don't

1:26:48

point out like and digital deluxe

1:26:50

content technically is some armor weapons

1:26:52

and horse armor everything they say

1:26:54

is true to me there's a

1:26:56

lot of misleading stuff but this

1:26:58

is no no I'm not saying

1:27:01

it's not misleading I'm just saying

1:27:03

it is technically factual the the

1:27:05

in the border I know they

1:27:07

say digital deluxe content on the

1:27:09

right And then over here it

1:27:11

says includes but the border around

1:27:13

the base game is different than

1:27:15

the border around the other two

1:27:17

things 100% like it really feels

1:27:19

like it is and I don't

1:27:21

think Yeah, like under here you

1:27:23

look at what it includes in

1:27:25

details the base game and then

1:27:27

way separate from that it says

1:27:30

shivering owls and nights in an

1:27:32

expansion. It really does And it's

1:27:34

just I don't see it mentioned

1:27:36

anywhere else that it does include

1:27:38

those in the base game So

1:27:40

that was another reason why I

1:27:42

held off But then I figured

1:27:44

out that's great. Yeah, it was

1:27:46

just misleading, but it does include

1:27:48

it So no, I didn't get

1:27:50

the digital deluxe because screw that

1:27:52

noise. I'm not buying horse armor

1:27:54

How will your horse be armored?

1:27:56

The funny thing about horse armor

1:27:59

in the game and one of

1:28:01

their justifications for it was that

1:28:03

it is in fact purely cosmetic.

1:28:05

It does not in fact armor

1:28:07

your horse. And your horse can

1:28:09

get attacked. Yes, very much so.

1:28:11

Your horse can become very unalived.

1:28:13

Literally doesn't help you. They states

1:28:15

all DLC was included in their

1:28:17

presentation when they shadow dropped it.

1:28:19

So this is piss poor self-education.

1:28:21

That's a hilarious take in my

1:28:23

opinion because you're now saying that

1:28:25

everyone that should buy this has

1:28:28

to watch their presentation. That is

1:28:30

a comically bad take. Which is

1:28:32

actually hilarious and not how like

1:28:34

people work or really anything works.

1:28:36

That's brutal. Whiskey and we love

1:28:38

you. Thank you for subscribing to

1:28:40

float plane but that is a

1:28:42

terrible take. And again I did

1:28:44

end up figuring out how it

1:28:46

worked and did end up buying

1:28:48

it. So I think the cell

1:28:50

of education was fine. It just

1:28:52

shouldn't be that hard. Yeah, it's

1:28:54

a little ridiculous, but it's doing

1:28:57

super well. They have tons of

1:28:59

players and I think they should

1:29:01

be happy. I'm just, I am

1:29:03

at least partially holding back for

1:29:05

the Skyblivian version, which I will

1:29:07

be very excited about. I had

1:29:09

to put my appointment back on.

1:29:11

So that's why you washed off

1:29:13

the resin. I knew, because I

1:29:15

saw it on you earlier, but

1:29:17

I was prepping just, anyways, it's

1:29:19

fine. Uh-huh, I got him! Oh,

1:29:21

M.G. Sammy, I bought the deluxe

1:29:23

edition because I thought the horse

1:29:26

armor meme was funny and I

1:29:28

wanted the cool armor, but I

1:29:30

don't know how to get it.

1:29:32

It's a quest, Sammy. My goodness.

1:29:34

No, Sammy. I thought you bought

1:29:36

it for the expansions. Yeah, that

1:29:38

was not the, uh, vindication that

1:29:40

you thought it was. It was

1:29:42

actually just more sad. Maybe you

1:29:44

just didn't self-educate on what Sammy

1:29:46

said. That's true. I didn't self-educated,

1:29:48

I didn't self-educate-educate-educate-educate-educate-educate-educate-ed-ed-ed-ed-ed-ed-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-d,-ded,-ded,-ded,-ded,-ded,-ded,-ded,-d Classic influencer. That's

1:29:50

why everybody fucking hates them. It's

1:29:52

worse though. What he said is

1:29:55

like just actually worse, I think.

1:29:57

I know. I don't know what

1:29:59

to do with him. How do

1:30:01

you spend more money on a

1:30:03

company? On the one hand, he

1:30:05

does a great job. On the

1:30:07

other hand... He's definitely going to

1:30:09

come to softball night this year

1:30:11

and I hate that. Dude, he's

1:30:13

infuriating. Why is that? He's just,

1:30:15

it's like he's trying, it's like

1:30:17

he's trying to make me lose.

1:30:19

It's softball, I want to win.

1:30:21

Softball is very competitive. Company softball

1:30:24

is in. Is this because he

1:30:26

goes on your team too much

1:30:28

and he's bad or is it

1:30:30

because he's really good and he

1:30:32

goes on the other team? He's

1:30:34

a pure agent of chaos. Like

1:30:36

he ran over Ariana. Yeah, I

1:30:38

was there for that. Literally like

1:30:40

plowed her over. Right through. Yeah,

1:30:42

just you never want to plow

1:30:44

the head of HR. Wasn't in

1:30:46

that much of a hurry, realist,

1:30:48

well he was, but didn't need

1:30:51

to be. I never lost. Flawless

1:30:53

win rate? I don't believe him.

1:30:55

Has he only been there once?

1:30:57

I don't believe him. No, no,

1:30:59

he's been there more than once.

1:31:01

Oh no, yeah, you know, he

1:31:03

comes pretty regularly. Sammy, I'm looking

1:31:05

forward to seeing you there. By

1:31:07

the way, Chewy's organizing a batting

1:31:09

cage thing. Get in touch so

1:31:11

that maybe you'll actually hit something

1:31:13

this year. Oh. I'll see you

1:31:15

there. Alright.

1:31:18

Okay, what else we got? Yeah,

1:31:20

plenty of things. Oh, we do

1:31:23

need to ding him out. We

1:31:25

need a bell? E-mot? Yeah, how

1:31:27

do we not have a dingamote

1:31:29

in the in the float plane

1:31:31

chat? What is your team not

1:31:33

like doing work or what? Sorry,

1:31:36

I'm just feeling kind of aggressive

1:31:38

right now. They are doing work

1:31:40

on things we can't talk about.

1:31:42

Oh, like what? Good stuff. Yep.

1:31:44

You sure? Yep. Dude, this was

1:31:46

actually, this week was kind of

1:31:49

awesome. I don't know if we've

1:31:51

revealed this yet, but whatever, I'm

1:31:53

going to do it. We shot

1:31:55

a collab with kit. Boga. That

1:31:57

was so much fun. There's going

1:32:00

to be videos on both of

1:32:02

our channels. I'm not going to

1:32:04

give away anything about them, but

1:32:06

it's with Kit Boga, so you

1:32:08

can imagine that it's going to

1:32:10

involve... Put one or two things

1:32:13

together there. Scammers and computers and...

1:32:15

Fantastic videos. Messing with scammers with

1:32:17

computers, you know, something along those

1:32:19

lines. Yeah, no, dude. We had

1:32:21

the entire production team. including ourselves,

1:32:23

because fortunately there's no video, right?

1:32:26

So we don't even have to

1:32:28

keep a straight face. We had

1:32:30

the entire room, just like in

1:32:32

stitches, multiple times to the point

1:32:34

where we had to like mute

1:32:37

our microphones because it was just

1:32:39

like some of the outlandish stuff

1:32:41

that happens. It's going to be

1:32:43

great. Oh, that's good. And then

1:32:45

I've got another collab upcoming where

1:32:47

we're going to be working with

1:32:50

badminton insights. So they're a big

1:32:52

badminton channel. Big week for collabs.

1:32:54

It's awesome. Oh, what

1:32:56

are we supposed to be talking

1:32:58

about? We're supposed to be talking

1:33:00

about. Microsoft, publicly rolling out recall

1:33:03

to consumer co-pilot plus PCs again,

1:33:05

along with improved window search and

1:33:07

click to do. Microsoft is launching

1:33:09

recall, no really for real this

1:33:12

time, via Windows Update to all

1:33:14

Copilot Plus PCs, it is available

1:33:16

now via the April 2025 Windows

1:33:18

non-security preview update. It's being accompanied

1:33:21

by an improved AI-powered Windows Search

1:33:23

interface, because that's what the Windows

1:33:25

Search interface needed, and a new

1:33:27

click-to-do feature which is similar to

1:33:30

Google's circle-to-search. A recall was originally

1:33:32

supposed to launch in June of

1:33:34

last year, but was delayed following

1:33:36

concerns brought up by security researchers.

1:33:39

And there were many. They have

1:33:41

spent 10 months overhauling some of

1:33:43

the security of recall, part of

1:33:45

which is making it an opt-in

1:33:48

experience. Okay, that's good. That's actually

1:33:50

very good. The database is also

1:33:52

now encrypted and attempts to filter

1:33:54

sensitive data by default. I thought

1:33:57

that was it was supposed to

1:33:59

do that. Maybe it's just better

1:34:01

at it. Maybe it's just better

1:34:03

at it. None. with someone who

1:34:06

has recall enabled, such as via

1:34:08

chat, email, etc. However, alongside recall,

1:34:10

you can now use Windows Search

1:34:12

with natural language queries. So if

1:34:15

you're looking for an image of

1:34:17

a brown dog, but can't remember

1:34:19

the file name, you can just

1:34:21

ask for Brown Dog. And then

1:34:24

it will just ask for Brown

1:34:26

Dog. And then it will bring

1:34:28

up a web search for Brown

1:34:30

Dog. And then it will bring

1:34:33

up a web search for Brown

1:34:35

Dog. And then it will bring

1:34:37

up a web search for you.

1:34:39

Oh no. That's the other side

1:34:42

of your laptop. Is it this?

1:34:44

Yes. Ah. Oh Lordy. All right.

1:34:46

Well, hold on a second. Our

1:34:48

laptop partner for the show, Dell,

1:34:51

probably doesn't want me to show

1:34:53

you guys what this other laptop

1:34:55

is. Do you want to get

1:34:57

some tape? No, I'm just going

1:35:00

to... Wow. Wow. Whoa. That was

1:35:02

smooth. Okay. There we go. Dang!

1:35:04

His name's Dan, actually. What's going

1:35:06

on? I can do that. I

1:35:08

can do that. Try to get

1:35:11

an HDMI. You can do that?

1:35:13

Yeah, right. You can't even lift

1:35:15

two and a half pounds. Oh

1:35:17

my. Sorry, it's a bit of

1:35:20

an inside joke. Have you even

1:35:22

ordered them yet? Yes. Doesn't seem

1:35:24

like it. It's not exactly like

1:35:26

they're out of stock out there.

1:35:30

My God. Yeah. Okay.

1:35:32

Sign in options. But,

1:35:34

okay. I don't have

1:35:36

it yet. Okay. You

1:35:38

don't have a what?

1:35:40

The laptop. You don't

1:35:42

have the laptop? Not

1:35:45

yet. You mean don't

1:35:47

have it? Of course

1:35:49

you don't have it.

1:35:51

I have it. No,

1:35:53

the screen part. That

1:35:55

goes on my screen.

1:35:58

Wow look it since

1:36:00

Stock, $7.50. Sounds like

1:36:02

a bit much. Can you

1:36:04

just use like, yeah,

1:36:06

why can't you just

1:36:08

lift a heavier weight?

1:36:10

Just put like a

1:36:12

rotisserie chicken on each side

1:36:15

or something. I can't

1:36:17

lift, I gotta, I gotta

1:36:19

grab those. I can't lift

1:36:21

it. I can't lift it.

1:36:24

Gotta eat them. Grab them

1:36:26

by the rotisserie chicken?

1:36:29

Plug and unplug. Okay,

1:36:31

I will try that. If you

1:36:33

just buy a pair of a

1:36:35

premium, it's so late. Yeah, Luke.

1:36:37

I told you I might literally

1:36:39

do that. So late to have

1:36:41

free access to a gym. Nothing.

1:36:44

All you have to do is

1:36:46

carry two and a half pounds

1:36:48

to the gym with you. I

1:36:50

helped design it. It's five pounds

1:36:52

because I need to bring two

1:36:55

of them. It's a lot of

1:36:57

weight. Sorry. This is as God

1:36:59

made it. It's definitely doing a

1:37:01

thing. It's detecting, yeah. When I

1:37:04

plug in the thing, so I

1:37:06

think this may be an issue

1:37:08

on your side, sir. Okay, it's

1:37:10

gonna issue, one sec. Okay, I'm

1:37:13

gonna say, show only on two.

1:37:15

Now, theoretically, you are the only

1:37:17

one with an output. My screen

1:37:19

is black. Why did you do

1:37:22

that? So that he can be the

1:37:24

one who definitely has an

1:37:26

output. You're

1:37:29

sending me 1080 by 1,200

1:37:31

I can't deal with that. Or let

1:37:33

me try doing- Oh no, is

1:37:35

it doing the stupid thing? Let

1:37:37

me try doing a thing. No,

1:37:40

I think it's doing the stupid

1:37:42

thing. The active signal versus

1:37:45

the- Oh, I hate that! I hate that

1:37:47

so much! Can it just never?

1:37:49

Okay. Invidia, AMD, Intel,

1:37:51

Microsoft, all for y'all for

1:37:54

y' all for y'all, get

1:37:56

rid of that. Get rid of

1:37:58

it completely. The whole act. Give

1:38:00

signal resolution, variable or

1:38:02

desktop mode, and then

1:38:05

being different. If I change

1:38:07

the resolution, just let the

1:38:09

panel do the scaling, nobody else

1:38:12

touch anything. Leave it. Oh, I

1:38:14

hate that so much. Unplug and

1:38:16

replug? Yes. Every single time.

1:38:19

This has ever been a thing.

1:38:21

It has been a problem. And

1:38:23

I cannot think of any

1:38:25

problem that it solves. What

1:38:27

problem does that solve? It

1:38:30

sends the native resolution

1:38:32

to the panel. What does that

1:38:34

have to do with the external

1:38:36

display? Nothing. Leave it alone.

1:38:39

Send whatever resolution that

1:38:41

I set. Don't do anything

1:38:43

else. Obnautious. Jonah

1:38:45

force it to 1080? I'm going

1:38:48

to try, but every time I

1:38:50

try and do this, it's a

1:38:52

gigantic hassle. It's caused us so

1:38:54

many problems in the past. And

1:38:57

overriding it is like a pain

1:38:59

in the butt. No, I can't do

1:39:01

anything with the invidia app because it

1:39:03

uses AMD. So there is no invidia

1:39:05

app and I can't remember. It's

1:39:07

more display modes. Do you want

1:39:09

me to come and fumble with

1:39:11

it? More display modes? Sorry, where's

1:39:14

that? Oh, it's Windows 11, I

1:39:16

can't remember. It should be under

1:39:18

advanced display. And then, wait, I'm

1:39:20

using a computer. I could just check

1:39:22

here. I know for the black magic.

1:39:24

It's this stupid after properties.

1:39:26

Usually you guys need some

1:39:28

tech tips. List all modes?

1:39:31

Yeah, that's the one. I

1:39:33

swear to God I've done

1:39:35

this. I am in 1920

1:39:37

by 1080, 60 hertz. I'm

1:39:39

still getting 1,200. I know.

1:39:41

For the black magic? It's

1:39:43

this stupid obnoxious thing. No,

1:39:45

I think there's something in

1:39:47

AMD's software where you have

1:39:50

to do something. Can you

1:39:52

just set all of it to

1:39:54

1080? No, I am set to

1:39:56

1080. On both displays,

1:39:58

I mean. They are... set to 1080

1:40:01

Dan. Oh good god. I swear

1:40:03

they're both set to 1080. I

1:40:05

have I can't change it. I think

1:40:07

like custom custom resolution

1:40:09

utility or something like this

1:40:11

is like mmm this is

1:40:14

one of those things that

1:40:16

makes me scaling mode I don't

1:40:18

know really meant a scaling won't

1:40:20

do it. Burning out of time

1:40:22

here. Yeah I think we might

1:40:25

just have to give up on

1:40:27

this. I can give you a laptop.

1:40:29

I really don't think it's going to

1:40:31

do anything though. This has been such

1:40:33

a good segment. Yeah, great

1:40:36

job everyone. Maybe I'll just do

1:40:38

another topic. Yeah, maybe just get

1:40:40

a Dell next time because when

1:40:43

I plug into my Dell

1:40:45

it just flipping works. There's

1:40:47

a pretty good advertisement.

1:40:49

Just an idea. Money please!

1:40:51

What is that? Because we

1:40:53

did a... it was technically

1:40:56

a call-out for somebody's technically

1:40:58

a sponsor. Anyways, Discord CEO

1:41:00

Jason Citrin steps down to

1:41:02

be replaced by former president

1:41:04

of King... Also known as

1:41:06

like the guys who made

1:41:08

Candy Crush, ahead of potential

1:41:10

IPO. On April 23rd Discord

1:41:12

CEO and co-founder the person

1:41:15

I just mentioned uploaded to

1:41:17

a post to Discord's blog

1:41:19

entitled Passing the Torch. restriction

1:41:21

goes on to share that

1:41:23

they have hired a new CEO. Human

1:41:25

Sakini. That's a... pretty sick

1:41:27

first name. Definitely not an AI

1:41:30

with a name like that. Yeah.

1:41:32

And that Citrin will be stepping

1:41:34

down to a board and advisory

1:41:36

position within Discord. Sakini's previous roles

1:41:38

include Vice Chairman at Activision Blizzard

1:41:40

as well as King, President of

1:41:42

King, Digital Entertainment, Maker's Organic Rush.

1:41:45

Discord's other co-founder, Stanislav

1:41:47

Vishenevsky, Vishnevsky, is continuing

1:41:50

his role as chief

1:41:52

technology officer. This change

1:41:55

comes amid media reports

1:41:57

that Discord met with.

1:41:59

bankers to discuss a possible initial

1:42:02

public offering as soon as this year.

1:42:04

A discord spokesperson told CNBC in a

1:42:06

statement that it does in quotes not

1:42:08

comment on rumors or speculation and that

1:42:10

it is... I feel like this court

1:42:13

has commented on a lot of rumors

1:42:15

in speculation over the years but sure.

1:42:17

Yeah, it is focused on delivering the

1:42:19

best possible experience to our users and

1:42:22

building a strong sustainable business. To me

1:42:24

honestly that is just like yes we're

1:42:26

doing it. But

1:42:28

anyways Discord currently has 200

1:42:31

million global monthly active users

1:42:33

playing a combined 1.5 billion

1:42:35

hours of games each month

1:42:37

while on the platform. All

1:42:39

right discussion question. What are

1:42:41

we going to switch to

1:42:44

from Discord? It will almost

1:42:46

certainly enchitify. I still use

1:42:48

teams speak every once in

1:42:50

a while. Mumble anyone? We

1:42:52

could go back. The old

1:42:54

guards are largely still there.

1:42:57

Which is kind of weird,

1:42:59

actually. Like mumbles still exists?

1:43:01

I'm pretty sure mumbles still

1:43:03

exists. I think ventrillo still

1:43:05

exists. I know team speaks

1:43:07

still exists. Yeah. Dude, when

1:43:10

did they get? When was

1:43:12

the last version? Stable version.

1:43:14

Show me a date. Show

1:43:16

me a date on this.

1:43:18

What? Okay, here we go.

1:43:20

Dude, December 2024. That wasn't

1:43:23

even that long ago. Yeah.

1:43:25

Vent. Look, look. Ventrillo

1:43:28

is totally still a thing. That

1:43:30

Windows logo though, good, amazing. That

1:43:32

is incredible. Team speaks still around.

1:43:34

Look, they have a among-us meme.

1:43:37

They're still around. How timely and

1:43:39

relevant? Yeah. Team speaks Twitter just

1:43:41

memes about how like, you know,

1:43:43

Discord will go down for a

1:43:45

second. And they'll be like, finally,

1:43:48

users! So they like, they're like

1:43:50

making self-owned jokes and stuff. But,

1:43:52

uh... Yeah, there's still a thing.

1:43:54

What would... What would, what in

1:43:56

crappification would it take for you

1:43:59

to stop using discord? People would

1:44:01

need to leave it. I feel

1:44:03

next to no alignment at all

1:44:05

with discord. I would be happy

1:44:07

to switch to and speak tomorrow.

1:44:10

Would you consider switching to just

1:44:12

steam? Like steam has, one of

1:44:14

the big reasons that everyone got

1:44:16

off of steam because everyone used

1:44:18

it. One of them as they're

1:44:21

like gaming social network. Okay, I

1:44:23

haven't tried it because it sucked

1:44:25

I don't know if it still

1:44:27

does right so they didn't have

1:44:29

it and then it sucked Would

1:44:32

we just go back to steam?

1:44:34

Apparently steam voice is really good

1:44:36

now and then the next person

1:44:38

who replied said it's kind of

1:44:40

trash. So I wonder when the

1:44:43

last time they used it though

1:44:45

if they think that it's trash

1:44:47

Well, like discord is more than

1:44:49

just games. Yeah, I mean we

1:44:51

use discord just to like Chat

1:44:54

about things that are not just

1:44:56

games is also more than just

1:44:58

games Steam's mobile app Not amazing

1:45:00

not amazing That's definitely an advantage

1:45:02

for discord not that ever get

1:45:05

a notification when you message me,

1:45:07

but sure whatever I got a

1:45:09

notification that you message me I

1:45:11

think yesterday this morning. Cool. I

1:45:13

was like wow. He's ignoring me.

1:45:16

I'm unfriended Turns out discord unfriended

1:45:18

me I can't see my podcast

1:45:20

moving their communities into steam. Yeah,

1:45:22

sure, I don't know. It's, it's,

1:45:24

uh... But I mean, Discord had

1:45:27

that same, Discord had that same

1:45:29

perception. Like, if you have a

1:45:31

good product, people might, I mean,

1:45:33

people used Skype for gaming for

1:45:35

crying out loud. Skype did not

1:45:38

have a gaming brand back then.

1:45:40

I think people will use a

1:45:42

good product for whatever it's good

1:45:44

for regardless of the branding. Modern

1:45:46

Team Speak also has like the

1:45:49

chat and picture and stuff sharing

1:45:51

features that that just Discord has.

1:45:53

Does it do the streaming thing

1:45:55

that Discord does or you can

1:45:57

like screen stream and stuff? I

1:46:00

don't know on that. No we're

1:46:02

not using Yahoo ChatWaffle with syrup.

1:46:04

Yeah I'm not sure on the

1:46:06

screen sharing thing and Discord's pushing

1:46:08

that hard. I don't know why.

1:46:11

I haven't really been able to

1:46:13

figure that out. Maybe they are...

1:46:15

Maybe yeah, what would they be

1:46:17

doing with that in Team Speak

1:46:19

communities you can stream, but you

1:46:22

have to pay for them and

1:46:24

server files? Server files aren't public

1:46:26

yet. You mean server files to

1:46:28

like self-host the streaming stuff? Is

1:46:30

that what you're saying? I'm not

1:46:33

sure what that person means. Cool.

1:46:35

Oh my self-hosted server I cannot

1:46:37

screenchair. Okay, so self-hosted you can't

1:46:39

but theirs you can which... Okay,

1:46:41

kind of makes sense. So yeah,

1:46:44

but what would it take basically?

1:46:46

Well, what do you think it

1:46:48

would take for any of your

1:46:50

like gaming buddies to get off

1:46:52

a discord? Like a major privacy

1:46:55

incident or like a data collection

1:46:57

change in the terms of service

1:46:59

or Just generally getting a little

1:47:01

less reliable like what what is

1:47:03

the what's the indication? That would

1:47:06

that would drive people off of

1:47:08

discord if the if they go

1:47:10

IPO and just kind of suck

1:47:12

now. Because like, Redit, it doesn't

1:47:14

seem to have mattered. They went

1:47:17

IPO, they antagonized their users, everybody's

1:47:19

still on Redit. People seem to

1:47:21

have completely forgotten that they were

1:47:23

mad. Yeah, people don't switch platforms

1:47:25

anymore. I read it. It's a

1:47:28

weird thing. I mean, we talked

1:47:30

about this with, we've talked about

1:47:32

this a few times on land

1:47:34

show. How like, YouTube, Redit, all

1:47:36

these things, they feel extremely rooted

1:47:39

now. Like this is how the

1:47:41

internet has like figured itself out.

1:47:43

These are the sites that just

1:47:45

will stay for whatever reason We

1:47:47

used to go through social media

1:47:50

platforms every couple years and now

1:47:52

things just stay no matter how

1:47:54

bad they are. It seems like

1:47:56

they just stick around. Yeah people

1:47:58

just don't switch because we seem

1:48:01

to have like critical mass or

1:48:03

something I'm not sure so I

1:48:05

think a big part of the

1:48:07

problem would be switching everyone and

1:48:09

I don't think a privacy incident

1:48:12

almost no matter how big is

1:48:14

going to switch everyone because as

1:48:16

much as people scream about it

1:48:18

I think most people unfortunately just

1:48:20

don't care. Okay well I think

1:48:23

the audio quality on Team Speak

1:48:25

is fantastic. I think there's other

1:48:27

things about it that are great.

1:48:35

But it like... Switch two

1:48:37

pre-orders have been kind of

1:48:39

a nightmare, and scalpers are

1:48:41

trying to cash in after

1:48:44

a delay to assess the

1:48:46

changing market conditions. Nintendo opened

1:48:48

up the North American pre-orders

1:48:50

for the switch-two on April

1:48:52

24th, and it was very

1:48:54

hard to secure one. There

1:48:56

are a ton of eBay

1:48:58

resellers who are selling their

1:49:00

secured pre-orders, like the but-heads

1:49:02

that they are. Please report

1:49:04

them. In Japan, where they're

1:49:06

offering a discounted Japanese-only version

1:49:08

of the console for about

1:49:10

$350 US dollars, over 2.2

1:49:12

million people entered the lottery

1:49:15

for the privilege of giving

1:49:17

their money to Nintendo. So

1:49:19

if you were questioning whether

1:49:21

the switch-to will be a

1:49:23

success as a gaming platform,

1:49:25

I think you can probably

1:49:27

put that wonder to rest

1:49:29

at this point. Yes, it

1:49:31

is more expensive than the

1:49:33

switch one. No, that does

1:49:35

not appear to matter. I'm

1:49:37

not surprised at all. And

1:49:39

even a little bit. That's

1:49:41

pretty wild to me. Those

1:49:43

are just monstrous numbers. Oh,

1:49:45

the numbers are, yeah, those

1:49:48

are crazy. What I mean

1:49:50

is I'm not surprised that

1:49:52

like, scalpers are an issue

1:49:54

and everybody's going for it.

1:49:56

That works for me. I

1:49:58

don't know, I kind of

1:50:00

believed in Nintendo that they

1:50:02

were just gonna like make

1:50:04

enough of them. You can't

1:50:06

make enough when you have

1:50:08

eight years of pent-up demand

1:50:10

for a Nintendo console that

1:50:12

doesn't look like donkey balls

1:50:14

on your TV. I mean

1:50:16

the switch was an old

1:50:19

phone when they launched it.

1:50:21

Don't eat tong balls. Super

1:50:23

hairy and big. He likes

1:50:25

bananas. Bongo-tastic. Bongo-balls. The

1:50:30

European Commission continues to be a

1:50:32

beacon of hope. The European Commission

1:50:34

finds €500 million for blocking app

1:50:37

developers from steering users to cheaper

1:50:39

payment options outside the App Store.

1:50:41

Meta also got hit with a

1:50:44

€200 million fine for its consent

1:50:46

or pay or pay for ad-free

1:50:48

versions of Facebook and Instagram. Honestly,

1:50:51

I was kind of okay with

1:50:53

Facebook's approach. Totally fine with it,

1:50:55

to be honest, just don't use

1:50:58

the service. However, Facebook Marketplace dodged

1:51:00

major regulation under the DMA after

1:51:02

the EU found that it had

1:51:04

fewer than 10,000 business users, so

1:51:07

it is no longer designated under

1:51:09

the DMA. The note here says,

1:51:11

Linus isn't convinced by that 10,000

1:51:14

business user number. Expand on that

1:51:16

thought for the class. I'd be

1:51:18

happy to. Simply based on the

1:51:21

number of commercial entities that I

1:51:23

see selling stuff on Facebook Marketplace

1:51:25

here, whether it's cars or services

1:51:28

or whatever else, across the entire

1:51:30

EU. You're going to tell me

1:51:32

there's less than 10,000 of them.

1:51:34

I do not believe you. I

1:51:37

think that's dramatically underreported. On a

1:51:39

more consumer-friendly note, starting June the

1:51:41

20th, all smartphones and tablets sold

1:51:44

in the EU must come with

1:51:46

a label showing battery life, energy

1:51:48

efficiency, and repairability ratings. How cool

1:51:51

is that? Does that mean there's

1:51:53

gonna be a standard for evaluating

1:51:55

these things? Is there a standard

1:51:57

for A? B-C-D-E for repairability class.

1:52:00

Yeah, yeah, that's not what I

1:52:02

mean. A standard? Oh, I don't

1:52:04

know. How do they rate them?

1:52:07

I don't know. Who's rating them?

1:52:09

I don't know. Someone is. How

1:52:11

do you rate repairability? How do

1:52:14

I fix it, does it? Yeah,

1:52:16

but that's one individual company. Well,

1:52:18

I'm just saying, you repair. I'm

1:52:21

sure there's a rubric. There you

1:52:23

repairability for battery life. What's the

1:52:25

test they're doing for repairability index

1:52:27

calm down I'm not saying it

1:52:30

doesn't exist I want to see

1:52:32

I'm saying I want to see

1:52:34

I want to see I'll fight

1:52:37

you What are we fighting about?

1:52:39

Repairability scoring system product bureau Europa.

1:52:41

EU Repair okay, here we go

1:52:44

including scoring here you happy. Geez.

1:52:46

How did they do it though?

1:52:48

Welcome to the website about product

1:52:51

repairability. Wow, that is like the

1:52:53

most European header that I think

1:52:55

I've ever, okay, project plan, project

1:52:57

plan, oh my god, documents. Where's

1:53:00

scoring then? Related links, oh boy.

1:53:02

Oh boy. I'd be really interested

1:53:04

to see how they score across

1:53:07

so many different devices, repairability and

1:53:09

battery. There's a second draft report,

1:53:11

okay, smart guy? Oh boy. Oh

1:53:14

boy. Oh boy, how long is

1:53:16

this. Uh, we need an AI

1:53:18

summary stat. Oh, hold on, hold

1:53:20

on, we got, no, no, we

1:53:23

got the thing, we got the

1:53:25

thing, we got the thing, we

1:53:27

got the index, the table of

1:53:30

indexes. Um, disassembly depth, fastener type,

1:53:32

tools, spare parts, software updates, repair

1:53:34

information, other relevant parameters, selection of

1:53:37

scoring parameters. Okay. I'd be really

1:53:39

interested to see how... How this

1:53:41

scale works versus the I-fixing scale?

1:53:44

Okay, so disassembly depth. Here we

1:53:46

go. Where is it? I said

1:53:48

it was on page 17. Disassembly

1:53:50

depth. There we go. A score

1:53:53

is assigned for each priority part

1:53:55

based on their disassembly depths. A

1:53:57

discrete rating is proposed. Points are

1:54:00

assigned at... priority part level so

1:54:02

rating class one disassembly depth index

1:54:04

less than or equal to two

1:54:07

steps is five points if you

1:54:09

are 15 steps of disassembly depth

1:54:11

that's one point and that's a

1:54:13

priority part so a priority part

1:54:16

I'm assuming would be like a

1:54:18

screen or battery a drive cool

1:54:20

I'm assuming okay sweet I wonder

1:54:23

how they do battery but that

1:54:25

is very cool I

1:54:28

mean, most batteries don't move around

1:54:30

much, so I'd imagine they just...

1:54:32

Do the battery, yo? Do you

1:54:35

feel battery? And then you spontaneously

1:54:37

combust. Someone pokes you and you

1:54:39

just blow up. Um, I fear

1:54:41

Samsung, yeah. Got him. Note seven.

1:54:43

Note seven, Zing. Wow, that's, uh,

1:54:46

timely. Uh, what are we supposed

1:54:48

to be doing right now, though,

1:54:50

dude? Oh, you got about five

1:54:52

minutes until when after dark. Oh.

1:54:54

Oh, yeah, you have an out.

1:54:57

Oh, yeah. I sort of forgot

1:54:59

about that. Yep. The LTT subreddit

1:55:01

has corrected Linus' take on American

1:55:03

cheese. He was wrong again. I

1:55:05

think I was also wrong, but

1:55:07

I'm going to point it at

1:55:10

him because it says Linus' take.

1:55:12

Not my fault this time didn't

1:55:14

have my name in the subject.

1:55:16

It is indeed made primarily from

1:55:18

real cheese with some added ingredients

1:55:21

to change its texture The two

1:55:23

linked threads point towards the video

1:55:25

by Nile red on his secondary

1:55:27

channel Nile blue making American cheese

1:55:29

on his own We're not going

1:55:32

to watch that here you guys

1:55:34

should go watch it. Yeah, the

1:55:36

discussion question is is it cheese

1:55:38

now? It doesn't taste like cheese

1:55:41

And maybe part of the problem is

1:55:43

the other ingredients. The particular brands, it's

1:55:45

like salt and something, or butter and

1:55:48

milk powder, something. Normally there's an emulsifier

1:55:50

as well, like a xantham gum or

1:55:52

something? Yeah. You can make it yourself.

1:55:54

There's great Chef Steps video on making

1:55:57

the process cheese. Chef Steps is great.

1:55:59

eaten are disgusting so I'll say that

1:56:01

much because it's mostly not cheese dude

1:56:03

it's alive with Brad is actually amazing

1:56:05

oh my god yeah with that oh

1:56:08

or is is it live with Brad

1:56:10

is that Bonapati yeah wait I'm talking

1:56:12

with the wrong one but yes I

1:56:14

like both of them both of them

1:56:16

both of them I got them conflated

1:56:19

but I do like both of them

1:56:21

so it has cheese in it and

1:56:23

that's good and I like my cheese

1:56:25

in a brick Chef

1:56:30

Stuffs makes the jewel, right? No,

1:56:32

that's a... they make the enova.

1:56:34

Ah... Apparently used to be Bon

1:56:36

Appetit, but he wants solo. Cool.

1:56:38

Either way, good stuff. Game over

1:56:40

there says American cheese is good

1:56:42

exclusively on sandwiches with really cheap

1:56:44

ass lunch meat. I mean, the

1:56:46

menu has a line in it

1:56:48

at the end that American cheese

1:56:50

is the best cheese for putting

1:56:52

on a burger because it doesn't

1:56:54

split when it's heated to a

1:56:56

high temperature. Doesn't split? That's what

1:56:58

the emulsifiers are for. By split?

1:57:00

Why would it split? Why would

1:57:02

it split? Well, the oils separate.

1:57:04

Well, the oils separate. Well, the

1:57:06

oils separate. Well, the oils separate.

1:57:08

What are you talking about? What

1:57:10

kind of cheese are you people

1:57:12

eating? This is normal cheese. Well,

1:57:14

why would you overheat it? Get

1:57:16

good. Say you're making a cheese

1:57:18

sauce or a grilled cheese? I

1:57:20

thought we were talking about a

1:57:22

burger. Yeah, we put it on

1:57:24

a hot burger. Put it on

1:57:26

a hot burger and then when

1:57:28

it melted, you eat it. What's

1:57:30

wrong with you people? Someone says

1:57:32

Linus, you don't cook. No, but

1:57:34

I can put, we're not talking

1:57:36

about cooking. We're talking about putting

1:57:39

cheese on a burger. That's not

1:57:41

even, that's not even, not even

1:57:43

cooking, who's not even cooking, who

1:57:45

cares. Who cares? No,

1:57:47

honestly though. Okay both of you

1:57:49

I have handed both of you

1:57:51

at some point or another a

1:57:53

hamburger with melted cheese on it

1:57:55

Are you telling me that I

1:57:57

prepared? Both of you. Explain this

1:57:59

to me. I don't know if

1:58:01

there's any evidence of this happening.

1:58:03

You know for a fact, more

1:58:06

than one time. More than one

1:58:08

time. I love how exclusively talking

1:58:10

about cheese melting on hamburgers went

1:58:12

to Linus Can't Cook. I just.

1:58:14

What is wrong with you people?

1:58:16

I'm just talking about emulsifiers in

1:58:18

American cheese and cheese. The conversation

1:58:20

with which Linus was following. Yeah,

1:58:22

but why do I need them?

1:58:24

What's wrong with the... What's wrong

1:58:26

with the melted cheese that's just

1:58:28

doesn't have emulsifying agents in it?

1:58:30

Stabilizes it for temperatures. Who cares?

1:58:33

Who cares? But I'm not making

1:58:35

a cheese sauce. I'm putting cheese

1:58:37

on a burger, damn it? Whatever

1:58:39

the hell you want. But what

1:58:41

do the emulsifiers do? Someone said

1:58:43

it doesn't do a thing. Cheddar

1:58:45

doesn't have the same effect on

1:58:47

hamburgers as American. What do you

1:58:49

mean the same effect? It adds

1:58:51

a cheesy flavor. What fucking effect

1:58:53

do you want from your cheese?

1:58:55

It makes the burger taste less

1:58:57

like plastic. You want it to

1:58:59

tap dance? We're going to end

1:59:02

up on the subreddit again because

1:59:04

of eulitis. Good. Uh, cheese discourse.

1:59:06

What do you guys do in

1:59:08

the talk? It's supposed to melt

1:59:10

easily like pizza. Unique username goes,

1:59:12

you don't know shit about cheese,

1:59:14

just do the correction. You're going

1:59:16

to be called a narcissist for

1:59:18

weeks again. No, I'm asking a

1:59:20

question. And no one's answering it.

1:59:22

Nobody is answering the question. What

1:59:24

is wrong with just melting regular

1:59:26

cheese. And there is the line.

1:59:29

Dance right. At the end of

1:59:31

the menu. He talks about how

1:59:33

American cheese is... Yeah, so what

1:59:35

Linus is talking about is completely

1:59:37

reasonable. What does it do better?

1:59:39

It just holds itself. What do

1:59:41

you mean it doesn't melt? It

1:59:43

just holds itself. together better. What

1:59:45

the fuck are people talking about?

1:59:47

It works fine. This is user

1:59:49

error. I'm sorry. What I'm if

1:59:51

I if I make an assumption

1:59:53

here. What do you mean? The

1:59:56

burger's not going to get it

1:59:58

up to the level where it's

2:00:00

going to like deemulsify. Deemulsify what?

2:00:02

We're talking about burgers. Yes, but

2:00:04

Jesus is suspension. and the milk

2:00:06

solids can separate out if you

2:00:08

overheat like say a cheese product

2:00:10

in a fondue or like in

2:00:12

a cheese sauce or something. Why

2:00:14

would I do that? Well you

2:00:16

wouldn't on a burger which is

2:00:18

why I don't know why they're

2:00:20

freaking out. Why would I do

2:00:22

that in a cheese sauce either?

2:00:25

Just control your temperature. Yeah exactly.

2:00:27

Like yeah, this is the cook

2:00:29

it right this is a great

2:00:31

answer No, this is like saying

2:00:33

you need to use like garbage

2:00:35

Garbage chocolate because you can't be

2:00:37

ours to use the double boiler

2:00:39

like what are we even talking

2:00:41

about? I don't know what you

2:00:43

mean like tempering chocolate which sucks

2:00:45

you could just do that with

2:00:47

an immersion circulator, but like Oh

2:00:49

my god, this is dumb. Just

2:00:52

use normal cheese. It's fine lineness.

2:00:54

You don't need to. You don't

2:00:56

need to have American cheese. The

2:00:58

oil separating out of the cheese.

2:01:00

Okay, are you talking about how

2:01:02

the oil kind of pools on

2:01:04

the top of the on the

2:01:06

top of the cheese? Like it

2:01:08

sweats? Is that what we're talking

2:01:10

about when you heat it up?

2:01:12

No. But that's what you're talking

2:01:14

about. Okay, when you're using real

2:01:16

cheese, it kind of wraps itself

2:01:18

around the burger a little bit,

2:01:21

right? I mean, yeah, if you

2:01:23

leave it in for too long.

2:01:25

A little bit, sure, okay. Well,

2:01:27

I think what they're talking about

2:01:29

is when you use the slice

2:01:31

American cheese thing, it will literally

2:01:33

keep its shape and like stick

2:01:35

out even after being cooked. Because

2:01:37

it becomes less heat sensitive because

2:01:39

it's basically. So it's not going

2:01:41

to wrap around the burger. It

2:01:43

keeps that like, I am a

2:01:45

square of cheese thing going on.

2:01:48

If you want that behavior, also

2:01:50

the pull is way better. People

2:01:52

are now saying no. It doesn't

2:01:54

do that. So I guess I

2:01:56

guess I'm wrong. I have no

2:01:58

idea. Cheese stays on the burger.

2:02:00

How are you going? Why is

2:02:02

knocking all the cheese off your

2:02:04

burgers? That's not true. Let's talk

2:02:06

about processed cheese food. Is that

2:02:08

not what we're talking about? Literally

2:02:10

the opposite. It melts more. It

2:02:12

belts better. That's just because it's

2:02:15

very thin. Yeah, why would you

2:02:17

want that? I like a big

2:02:19

old thick? I can afford cheese

2:02:21

separate on a burger in my

2:02:23

entire life. The oil is already

2:02:25

in the cheese. There isn't more

2:02:27

oil. Okay, so what they're saying

2:02:29

is that it melts more and

2:02:31

wraps more around the burger. It

2:02:33

wraps more around the burger. That's

2:02:35

just because it's very thin. Yeah,

2:02:37

why would you want that? I

2:02:39

like a big old thick, I

2:02:41

can afford cheese slice a cheese

2:02:44

on my hamburger. I'm not gonna...

2:02:46

I like this actually. Elementary exclusive

2:02:48

Linus Barbicues burgers with five different

2:02:50

cheeses to test it out. I

2:02:52

think that's great. I think that's

2:02:54

fantastic. It's great for grilled cheese.

2:02:56

You know what else is great

2:02:58

for grilled cheese? Learning to just

2:03:00

cut cheese evenly with a knife

2:03:02

and then putting cheese on your

2:03:04

grilled cheese. You do get some

2:03:06

incredible strings. There's absolutely no way

2:03:08

that I would put like American

2:03:11

cheese. at least like a craft

2:03:13

singles. Is that what we're talking

2:03:15

about? We're talking about craft singles?

2:03:17

That's what I thought we were

2:03:19

talking about. Because that's my understanding.

2:03:21

That's what I thought too? Yeah.

2:03:23

I would rather eat plastic than

2:03:25

eat craft singles on a grilled

2:03:27

cheese sandwich. I'm sorry. I mean...

2:03:29

They say, so okay, so American

2:03:31

cheese, especially when using a brand

2:03:33

with emulsifiers like sodium citrate, melts

2:03:35

exceptionally well and creates a smooth

2:03:37

fluid texture according to Bonapeti. This

2:03:40

contrast with some other cheeses might

2:03:42

become clumpy or greasy when melted.

2:03:44

Skill issue. Okay, what else we

2:03:46

got here? What else we got

2:03:48

this week? I don't freaking lose

2:03:50

it. And so craft singles are

2:03:52

apparently bad. Whatever they use at

2:03:54

Subway is also inedible. That stuff

2:03:56

is trash. I wouldn't feed it

2:03:58

to my dog. I don't even

2:04:00

have a dog. Okay, if you want the

2:04:02

properties of American cheese, just follow

2:04:05

the Shep steps video and just

2:04:07

get some real cheese and then just

2:04:09

put some chemicals in it and you're

2:04:11

done. It's real cheese, but with chemicals.

2:04:14

That's it. You processed it. Perineen is

2:04:16

still mad that I'm saying it doesn't

2:04:18

lead to more oil because the texture

2:04:20

of the liquid is different. Yeah, but

2:04:23

that's not more oil. That's just that the

2:04:25

oil is on top of the... By

2:04:27

the time you're taking a bite of

2:04:29

a burger a little bit of liquid

2:04:31

oil in this thing Is that is

2:04:33

that a concern? I mean, it's got

2:04:35

a beef patty on it, right? Like

2:04:37

come on. I don't know I've never

2:04:39

seen an oil with like Kevin bear

2:04:41

or like a real You don't you

2:04:43

don't take the burger apart and like

2:04:45

lick the top of the cheese. Do

2:04:47

you why is the oil there a

2:04:49

concern? I eat my burgers like Oreos,

2:04:52

so I don't know what you're talking

2:04:54

about You don't come in milk It's

2:04:56

like a hot dog eating competition. I

2:04:58

want to see Linus do the cheese

2:05:00

jar challenge. Oh God, that sounds awful.

2:05:03

What is the cheese jar challenge? I

2:05:05

don't know, but it sounds like it

2:05:07

involves like cheese whiz. They made me

2:05:09

eat cheese whiz as like a like

2:05:11

a spin for punishment thing on a

2:05:14

live stream a while back and I

2:05:16

just about vomited. It was

2:05:18

horrible. Just didn't even come up

2:05:20

with anything. It came up like

2:05:22

the great jar trial from... Eldred

2:05:25

ring. I have no idea. You

2:05:27

have 30 minutes left. Can we

2:05:29

talk about not fake cheese? I

2:05:32

mean, real cheese, but it just

2:05:34

has emulsifiers in it. We can

2:05:36

talk about the slate truck. The

2:05:39

$20,000 American-made pickup truck with no

2:05:41

paint, no stereo, and no touch

2:05:43

screen. So it's amazing. Michigan-based slate

2:05:46

auto has developed the slate truck,

2:05:48

meant as a blank slate to

2:05:50

be extremely customizable and extremely affordable.

2:05:53

It's expected to be sub-20 grand

2:05:55

after federal incentives, assuming those stick

2:05:57

around, aiming for a production start.

2:05:59

in 2026. Instead of steel

2:06:02

or aluminum, the body panels

2:06:04

are unpainted molded plastic or

2:06:06

as Slate calls them, injection

2:06:09

molded polypropylene composite material.

2:06:11

The unpainted body was designed to

2:06:13

take advantage of the trend of

2:06:15

vinyl wrapping cars. They offer vinyl

2:06:18

wrap kits directly or you can

2:06:20

DIY it. There's a configurator that

2:06:22

is live on their site right

2:06:24

now. Oh, personalize your slate. Let's

2:06:27

go. Boom. Slate. Slate truck.

2:06:30

Environment? Color

2:06:33

dip. Okay? Click

2:06:35

on Personalize.

2:06:38

Let's go. Yo.

2:06:40

Nice. All right. So

2:06:43

vinyl, vinyl

2:06:45

wraps. Definitely.

2:06:49

Not going like

2:06:51

this is cool.

2:06:53

Okay, even show like if you if

2:06:56

you don't want to like go through

2:06:58

all the work of getting like very

2:07:00

legitimate speakers you can just do this

2:07:02

Um Wow, what it's a just a Bluetooth

2:07:04

speaker is you just print a

2:07:07

I'm assuming you just three-d print

2:07:09

a Bluetooth worker hot dog holder.

2:07:11

Yeah, that is hilarious. Just like

2:07:13

yeah, whatever just you know you

2:07:15

want some sound you don't want

2:07:17

to pay for speakers throughout your

2:07:20

truck done The truck does not come

2:07:22

with any infotainment at all, not even

2:07:24

a radio. Slate intends to make information

2:07:26

regarding basic repair and maintenance available through

2:07:28

a slate university. And they have a

2:07:31

partnership with already established nationwide service centers

2:07:33

for work on things like the high

2:07:35

voltage system or for customers who just

2:07:38

want the work taken care of. They

2:07:40

will not be doing sailors through a

2:07:42

dealership, but through direct sales online and

2:07:44

pickup locations similar to Tesla. So discussion

2:07:47

question here is would you buy a

2:07:49

vehicle that is lacking everything but

2:07:51

the absolute basics? If you did, would you

2:07:53

intend to drive it as is or would you upgrade

2:07:55

it slash make it your own? I'd upgrade it, make

2:07:57

it my own. And I would absolutely.

2:08:00

seems super cool like it's one of those

2:08:02

like yeah for real though like I already

2:08:04

have a phone yeah whatever tablet but like

2:08:06

in you could set up a screen in

2:08:08

there that you connect your phone to that

2:08:10

just like makes your phone screen bigger and

2:08:12

more easy to interact with like that's fine

2:08:14

but you can set that up your own

2:08:16

self or you just get one of those

2:08:18

yeah you're totally fine What

2:10:45

what what what I see doing

2:10:47

there meat and great meat and

2:10:49

great with the one the one

2:10:52

and only Colton Potter fired him

2:10:54

and now he's Working for them

2:10:56

imagine that what a guy? Anyway,

2:10:58

hold on. There's a bunch of notes

2:11:00

in the doc. So this is Jay's

2:11:03

two cents slash heights SoCal Tech Fair,

2:11:05

happening in the city of industry, California,

2:11:07

on May the 3rd and 4th, our

2:11:09

team is sponsoring the Tower of Power

2:11:12

booth activity, where you can take part

2:11:14

in a frantic 2v2 motherboard stacking face-off

2:11:16

to see which tech community team gets

2:11:18

the highest height in under two minutes.

2:11:21

Random hardware provided, stacking ability skills, unfortunately,

2:11:23

optional. You can win LT store.com prizes,

2:11:25

including commuter rack packs, screwdrivers, magnetic cable

2:11:27

management, sticker packs, sticker packs, and

2:11:30

more. And if you come on Sunday, Colton

2:11:32

will be there to say, hi, and

2:11:34

you're fired. Good catchphrase. Has anyone ever

2:11:36

thought of that before? Some other cool

2:11:38

things happening at the event. There's an

2:11:40

AMD CPU trade-in offer while supplies last.

2:11:42

You can trade any AMD CPU in

2:11:44

any... Five

2:13:12

minutes limited trade-in while supplies last

2:13:15

I mean, yeah, there's gonna be

2:13:17

there's gonna be some kind of

2:13:19

gating There's absolutely no way that

2:13:22

every single person who attends is

2:13:24

getting a free CPU and motherboard.

2:13:26

So it's got to be the

2:13:28

well supplies last part I yeah,

2:13:31

I mean good luck good luck

2:13:33

with getting that because that seems

2:13:35

like a very good deal Also

2:13:38

I buy power is gonna have

2:13:40

a GPU garage sale You can

2:13:42

learn more and get tickets by

2:13:44

searching Sokal Tech Fair or at

2:13:47

the link in the video description.

2:13:49

Also, the Boink Pentathlon 2025. The

2:13:51

LTT Forum Boink team will be

2:13:54

competing in the Boink Pentathlon 2025

2:13:56

running from May 5th to May

2:13:58

19th. In this event, we'll go

2:14:00

up against other tech communities by

2:14:03

contributing computing power through Boink to

2:14:05

support scientific research and progress. While

2:14:07

only point points count toward the

2:14:10

pentathlon, we'll also be tracking folding

2:14:12

at home stats for anyone signed

2:14:14

up. If you want to join

2:14:16

the competition and support science, you

2:14:19

can find all the details and

2:14:21

sign up info on the LTT

2:14:23

forum. That's Linus techtips.com. Just look

2:14:26

for the boink pentathlon 2025 thread.

2:14:28

All right, it's time for after

2:14:30

dark. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:32

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:35

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:37

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:39

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:42

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:44

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:46

Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin. Boin.

2:14:48

Boin Where would they have posted

2:14:51

that? Probably here, right? Yeah, here

2:14:53

we go. Community. Boink pentathlon. It's

2:14:55

just pentathlon. There's no second day.

2:14:58

Oh. Yeah, common mistake. Hmm. Pentathlon

2:15:00

sounds better. I know. Some Mandela

2:15:02

effect here. Bernstein bears. Yeah. Brenstein

2:15:04

stain. Bredstain. Brenstain? Berenstain. Oh yeah.

2:15:07

After dark, let's go. Are they

2:15:09

even bears? All right, I got

2:15:11

some March messages here for you.

2:15:14

The one that gets me the

2:15:16

most is the fruit of the

2:15:18

loom cornucopia thing. Yeah, mess me

2:15:20

up. That one, I had a

2:15:23

therapy. Do they not have a

2:15:25

cornucopia? The claim is that they

2:15:27

don't, but I specifically remember learning

2:15:30

what learning what that was. Because

2:15:32

of asking my mom about the...

2:15:34

Yeah, apparently that's not a thing.

2:15:36

What? Yeah, no, I don't. It

2:15:39

says fact check, click into it,

2:15:41

let's do not believe that at

2:15:43

all. I don't believe it either,

2:15:45

man. Are you sure? Yeah, the

2:15:48

fruit of the loan logo that

2:15:50

never contained... What? Now this I've

2:15:52

never seen, but what? Trading false?

2:15:55

So it did, basically. No, no,

2:15:57

no, no. Yeah, fact check. It

2:15:59

has never contained one. What? Rating

2:16:01

false. Yeah. Okay, scroll up slightly.

2:16:04

What is happening? Stop there! the

2:16:06

claim and then read the rating

2:16:08

date. At some point it contained

2:16:11

a cornucopia. That is false. Oh.

2:16:13

Meaning they're saying that it did

2:16:15

not contain a cornucopia. But I

2:16:17

don't believe that. I also refuse

2:16:20

to believe that. There's no way,

2:16:22

dude. It's been disproved. What's been

2:16:24

disproved? That it contained a cornucopia.

2:16:27

Which there's like no way. What?

2:16:30

This is a fabrication, not

2:16:32

an actual fruit of the

2:16:34

loom logo. Like, what are

2:16:36

you talking about? There's no

2:16:38

way. The only thing that

2:16:40

I thought of was we

2:16:42

used to, they disprove fruit

2:16:45

the loom's claim? Is that

2:16:47

true? Is it never contain

2:16:49

a cornucopia? Okay, because this

2:16:51

actually looks pretty familiar to

2:16:53

me as well. This looked

2:16:55

very familiar though. I swear

2:16:57

that one's real. Maybe their

2:16:59

logo has emulsifiers in it

2:17:01

too. Fruit of the limb.

2:17:03

I mean... There's proof they

2:17:06

did it was marketing, but

2:17:08

then why does this thing

2:17:10

say the claim is false?

2:17:12

Well this is Yahoo Finance.

2:17:14

I don't know. This doesn't

2:17:16

look right to me though.

2:17:19

Found in thrift stores. More examples

2:17:21

sent to Snopes appear to have

2:17:23

their origins in a June 2020

2:17:26

that went among other things. The

2:17:28

other example of some from a

2:17:30

Tiktop video proposed cover-up is one

2:17:32

of the greatest marketing employees in

2:17:34

history. The providence of these photos

2:17:37

is unknown and as a result

2:17:39

their utility is evidence is limited.

2:17:41

Okay. I don't know, man. People

2:17:43

are saying the site is wrong.

2:17:45

Yeah, I don't know. I'm very

2:17:47

upset right now. I could have

2:17:50

sworn it had a thing. Wait,

2:17:52

an early version did have it,

2:17:54

but it was dropped. What is

2:17:56

this? Oh no. Oh no. Oh

2:17:58

no. Okay. Well. Okay. Well, anyway,

2:18:00

after dark. Oh man, I'm so

2:18:03

upset. I was also a Shazam-kazam

2:18:05

bamboozled or lir. I was bamboozled.

2:18:07

Whatever the wrong one is, I

2:18:09

thought that Sinbad was in a

2:18:11

movie called Kazam, but it's actually

2:18:13

Shack and a movie called Shazam

2:18:16

or whatever. Like I could have

2:18:18

sworn I remembered seeing a VHS

2:18:20

of Sinbad as a genie, but

2:18:22

apparently that never happened. So it's

2:18:24

a genie, so it's a genie,

2:18:27

but apparently that never happened. So

2:18:29

yeah, it's a whole thing, Mandela

2:18:31

effect, man. The Kornikovia thing, like

2:18:33

I refused to give up on

2:18:35

her explaining. the word cornucopia. That's

2:18:37

how I learned the word cornucopia

2:18:40

was from the fruit of the

2:18:42

loom logo. Yeah. So I don't

2:18:44

know. Do you think it could

2:18:46

have been knockoffs? Yeah. Yeah. That's

2:18:48

the only theory that's made sense

2:18:50

to me because back then we

2:18:53

got a lot of stuff from

2:18:55

thrift stores in secondhand and stuff

2:18:57

like that. Same area. And maybe.

2:18:59

Maybe. Maybe. But why are you

2:19:01

knocking off fruit of the loom?

2:19:03

I don't know anymore. That's the

2:19:06

last remaining thing for me. It's

2:19:08

like, weren't they cheap in the

2:19:10

first place? Maybe that's why this

2:19:12

timeline is so messed up. So...

2:19:14

They changed something. Who's making a

2:19:17

knockoff version of the cheap brand?

2:19:19

I understand the Fruilloom website says

2:19:21

no, I don't care. I don't

2:19:23

believe it. He doesn't care. He

2:19:25

doesn't believe it. Okay. All right.

2:19:27

Why has email not changed in

2:19:30

the past 20 years? Number one

2:19:32

time annoying thing in business is

2:19:34

email. Why haven't anyone come up

2:19:36

with a more efficient way to

2:19:38

process email? Threads changed in the

2:19:40

last 20 years. That was a

2:19:43

huge change. I mean there's still

2:19:45

a lot of issues like formatting

2:19:47

and like text formatting and like

2:19:49

reply formatting in email chains when

2:19:51

people are using different services or

2:19:54

clients can still get a little

2:19:56

bit messy but overall. email is

2:19:58

for me, not the number one

2:20:00

most annoying thing. It's actually really

2:20:02

annoying when people send me anything

2:20:04

that needs actual thought put into

2:20:07

it via any means other than

2:20:09

email. Because as soon as I

2:20:11

have read something like on my

2:20:13

phone, if it requires more than

2:20:15

two seconds of thought, I can't

2:20:17

reply to you right now because

2:20:20

I'm in the middle of something.

2:20:22

And I will never think to

2:20:24

reply to you again because now

2:20:26

it isn't marked on red and

2:20:28

it's not sitting in my email

2:20:30

where it can be. carefully organized

2:20:33

and isn't just going to get

2:20:35

buried the next time someone messages

2:20:37

me something because the way that

2:20:39

sorting works on messaging apps is

2:20:41

not ideal for the way that

2:20:44

my ADD brain works. And there

2:20:46

are more efficient ways to process

2:20:48

emails. There's like priority view in

2:20:50

your Gmail inbox. There's like AI

2:20:52

reply help if you're into that

2:20:54

sort of thing. Oh, it was

2:20:57

probably in the last 20 years.

2:20:59

Yeah, huge difference maker. Email has

2:21:01

definitely changed. Email was was largely

2:21:03

processed on, like, email clients. And

2:21:05

I remember it was, like, an

2:21:07

actual job back in, like, the

2:21:10

Geezquad era to, like, back up

2:21:12

people's email files so that you

2:21:14

could transfer them to their new

2:21:16

computer and stuff. Like, e-mail has

2:21:18

dramatically changed. It's way better. It's

2:21:20

way better. Don't do that lionet.

2:21:23

We both cleared and so we

2:21:25

cleared too. Oh, I'll read one

2:21:27

while I look for it. Question

2:21:29

for Luke, if you could, would

2:21:31

you own bigger birds like parrot-sized?

2:21:34

No. If you could, he probably

2:21:36

wouldn't own the size of birds

2:21:38

he has now. Never thought about

2:21:40

that. Fun fact, you can. We

2:21:42

have to do seven medications a

2:21:44

day right now. You wouldn't even

2:21:47

have to squeeze that hard. We

2:21:49

have to do seven medications a

2:21:51

day right now. And my God.

2:21:53

And we have to give them

2:21:55

milk thistle. I think that's milk

2:21:57

thistle. I think that's milk thistle.

2:22:00

Medicated water, basically. It's... Right. Okay,

2:22:02

here out, Charge Nuclear Eye. Chickens.

2:22:04

I bet you don't chickens. I

2:22:06

used to keep chickens. Ten out

2:22:08

of ten birds. Chickens are probably

2:22:10

the only one, and it's because

2:22:13

they have a utility. I mean,

2:22:15

technically, Budgies have the same utility.

2:22:17

You just have a hang-up about

2:22:19

it. Eating their eggs? Well, I

2:22:21

mean, not everybody just eats the

2:22:24

chicken eggs. Oh. There's really not

2:22:26

a lot of meat on a

2:22:28

bunch. They got feet to me.

2:22:30

I'm not saying it has a

2:22:32

ton of utility. It would hardly

2:22:34

even constitute a snack. I'm just

2:22:37

saying it has some. A bagel

2:22:39

bite? No, I don't even, like

2:22:41

a triscit. Just a little triscit

2:22:43

with melted cheese, proper cheese, and

2:22:45

then a little bit. You mean

2:22:47

it? But then it might not

2:22:50

be properly melted, Linus. You clearly

2:22:52

don't have a cook. Shut up!

2:22:56

Anyway, I just wanted no context

2:22:59

shirt with a burger patty with

2:23:01

melted cheese on the top of

2:23:03

it I've said so mixed so

2:23:06

many messages What's I gonna say?

2:23:08

Yeah, no indoor birds. I don't

2:23:10

want a bigger one because the

2:23:13

poop is a problem budgies the

2:23:15

poops Not really that big of

2:23:17

a deal, but I want to

2:23:19

be able to allow them to

2:23:22

fly, see if you have a

2:23:24

larger bird that has big, goopy

2:23:26

poop. You don't want that flying

2:23:29

all over the place. There's pictures

2:23:31

people have shown me of like

2:23:33

their monitors. And the back of

2:23:36

their monitors is just like covered

2:23:38

in... It's gross. Don't want that.

2:23:40

In response to the next merge

2:23:42

message. This is not my wife.

2:23:45

Oh, our next merch message. This

2:23:47

is a Hong Kong-based actor. She's

2:23:49

50. She's a little old for

2:23:52

me. Pretty impressive. filmography which is

2:23:54

nice and good for her but

2:23:56

she is not in fact my

2:23:59

wife so this next verse matches

2:24:01

merge message hello Linus you've mentioned

2:24:03

Yvon is from Hong Kong as

2:24:06

someone else who married a girl

2:24:08

from Hong Kong I was wondering

2:24:10

if you've taught the kids Cantonese

2:24:12

and go back to visit from

2:24:15

time to time I have never

2:24:17

said my wife is from Hong

2:24:19

Kong she is not from Hong

2:24:22

Kong We do go back to

2:24:24

visit the country that she's actually

2:24:26

from, which is Malaysia slash Brunei,

2:24:29

but I don't know, once every

2:24:31

10 years or so. We actually

2:24:33

just went back and Yvonne does

2:24:36

not speak Cantonese. She speaks a

2:24:38

little bit of Mandarin from when

2:24:40

she was a kid, but barely

2:24:42

these days. Yeah, Mandela effect again.

2:24:45

Here we go. Here we go.

2:24:48

Um, I did, I had, not,

2:24:50

not, not scrap EDP, I'm not

2:24:53

being mean, she, I'm not saying

2:24:55

she's old, I'm just saying she's

2:24:57

a little old for me. She's

2:25:00

11 years older than me. What?

2:25:02

What? You know, when people get

2:25:04

to a certain age, yes. Their

2:25:06

age band tends to increase. Their

2:25:09

age band? Yeah, what they're acceptable

2:25:11

with, and I'm just saying, maybe

2:25:13

you're up there. Yeah, really. How

2:25:21

old are you now? 38? Don't

2:25:23

worry about it. Hold on, which

2:25:25

one is it? Crap. Yes, barely

2:25:27

though. Yeah, okay. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:25:30

So if you went, there are

2:25:32

definitely 38 year olds that would

2:25:34

date 27 year olds. And I

2:25:36

might say, I don't know, they

2:25:39

seem a little for you. Young?

2:25:41

Well, okay, the thing is young.

2:25:43

Yeah, they're stating down 11 years.

2:25:45

I don't think they're a little

2:25:48

old. Oh, sorry. No, no. I

2:25:50

thought we were going the other

2:25:52

way. Okay. I would say that.

2:25:54

But if an 11-year gap works

2:25:57

for someone, then that's fine. It's

2:25:59

huge. It's huge. I wouldn't do

2:26:01

it. You do you. In either

2:26:03

direction. That's a lot. You do

2:26:06

you. Well, there's like a generational

2:26:08

gap. I don't know. Mucken Twish

2:26:10

says Law, Linus Things 27 is

2:26:13

a little old for a 38-year-old.

2:26:15

I mean, it's a very different,

2:26:17

it's a very different life stage.

2:26:19

It's fine. It's not like, like

2:26:22

I'm in the middle of my

2:26:24

middle of my career. And I'm

2:26:26

dating someone who is like getting

2:26:28

close to the end of theirs

2:26:31

potentially, especially if they work in

2:26:33

film. And so like we're just

2:26:35

going to be at completely different

2:26:37

life stages in a very short

2:26:40

amount of time. That's a major

2:26:42

concern for me. Like I like

2:26:44

that Yvonne and I, the other

2:26:46

more different Yvonne, the one I

2:26:49

actually married, are going to like

2:26:51

age together. You know, barring any

2:26:53

kind of, you know, knock on

2:26:55

wood, horrible, you know, health affliction

2:26:58

or anything like that, we're going

2:27:00

to mostly fall apart at probably

2:27:02

almost around the same timeish, you

2:27:04

know. It doesn't all goes according

2:27:07

to plan. It doesn't gross me

2:27:09

out. I wouldn't do it. And

2:27:11

it's going to be surprising to

2:27:13

me. But yeah, I don't know.

2:27:16

I just think if you're going

2:27:18

to be cool with going... X

2:27:20

amount of years down you should

2:27:23

also be cool with going X

2:27:25

amount of years up Yeah, I'm

2:27:27

not I'm not saying I'm not

2:27:29

saying it makes any kind of

2:27:32

but if you're not cool going

2:27:34

X amount of years down then

2:27:36

yeah fair enough I like that

2:27:38

Yvonne and I are the same

2:27:41

age and I totally recognize that

2:27:43

other Things work for other people.

2:27:45

Yeah, it's fine. Yeah, yeah, totally

2:27:47

fine. Okay mick 81 dating a

2:27:50

37 year old are we talking

2:27:52

about mick jagger Hold on. I

2:27:54

mean that's not your girlfriend at

2:27:56

that point. That's your that's like

2:27:59

your Like caretaker

2:28:01

Melanie Hamrick and Mick

2:28:04

Jagger 44-year age gap

2:28:06

So I'm saying is

2:28:09

he should be open

2:28:11

to how old is

2:28:14

he again? Too much

2:28:16

81 was it said?

2:28:19

Yeah, I think so

2:28:22

I don't think that's

2:28:24

legal I don't think

2:28:27

you're allowed to do

2:28:29

that although he could

2:28:32

probably afford to do

2:28:34

what he wants Bill

2:28:37

Belichick is 70 and

2:28:39

his girlfriend is 24.

2:28:42

All right, here we

2:28:44

go. Uh, okay. That's

2:28:47

normal. Fans fear for

2:28:50

him after her bizarre

2:28:52

social media post. Yeah,

2:28:56

that doesn't seem like

2:28:59

a mismatch at all.

2:29:01

You know? Is that

2:29:03

the bizarre social media

2:29:05

post? That's not bizarre.

2:29:07

That's awesome. That's adorable.

2:29:10

That's cute, if anything.

2:29:16

Okay, well anyway, that's surely he

2:29:18

wasn't allowed to eat until she

2:29:20

took the picture who cares? What?

2:29:23

Who cares? That would even be

2:29:25

true. He also is eating. He's

2:29:27

like totally like starting on it

2:29:29

while she takes a picture of

2:29:31

her food. Calm down. Get off

2:29:34

it. My goodness. Calm down. This

2:29:36

is what happens with the cornucopia

2:29:38

goes missing. The world just everything

2:29:40

is gone downhill. Down hills. Yeah,

2:29:42

you can't do this anymore. Yeah.

2:29:44

All right. Hello, fellow humans. Would

2:29:47

the AMDA APUs, with great graphics

2:29:49

performance, do you think GPUs will

2:29:51

become less popular? Yes, they already

2:29:53

have. Especially cheap GPUs, they basically

2:29:55

don't exist anymore. Boom! It's AMVs

2:29:58

fault! I

2:30:02

accept this. This is true.

2:30:04

Video. Slash s. Oh my

2:30:06

god, slash s, please. No,

2:30:08

no, no, no, no. He

2:30:11

said it. He said it.

2:30:13

Go after him on, read

2:30:15

it. Make a thread. Just

2:30:17

add it to the cheese

2:30:19

one. I don't care anymore.

2:30:21

High, LDD Crew. Hey, now

2:30:23

that Linus has now developed

2:30:25

a few products. Is he

2:30:28

a fan of, quote unquote,

2:30:30

designed by committee? For example,

2:30:32

Microsoft. Wait, what? The correct

2:30:34

answer is having a singular

2:30:36

guiding vision and consulting a

2:30:38

committee and taking the best

2:30:40

ideas from your committee of

2:30:42

people that presumably you surrounded

2:30:45

yourself with because they're smart

2:30:47

and then combining all of

2:30:49

those. reaching a consensus about

2:30:51

what the best product is

2:30:53

to achieve the vision, which

2:30:55

may have changed through discussion

2:30:57

with the rest of the

2:30:59

team, and then creating a

2:31:01

product that is better than

2:31:04

what any one of those

2:31:06

people would have created, but

2:31:08

not as directionless as what

2:31:10

an entire team would have

2:31:12

created. There you go. You're

2:31:14

welcome. Someone disprove this. Way

2:31:16

back machine, fruit.com for the

2:31:18

loom logo. What fruit.com? Is

2:31:21

there actual website? Just fruit.com.

2:31:23

Yes, it is. It was

2:31:25

archived on April Fools. No!

2:31:27

No way. So did the

2:31:29

fruit of the loom company

2:31:31

for April Fools put up

2:31:33

a logo with the cornucopia

2:31:35

in it? Got him. What

2:31:38

a troll. That's actually an

2:31:40

amazing troll. That's pretty good.

2:31:42

That's actually fantastic. That's pretty

2:31:44

good. All right. Well, you

2:31:46

know what? It's been great

2:31:48

hanging out with y'all. I

2:31:50

mean, doing a therapy session

2:31:52

with y'all. Yeah. We will

2:31:55

see you again next week.

2:31:57

How long can I, I

2:31:59

can How long

2:32:01

can I,

2:32:03

I can pause

2:32:05

forever. You could

2:32:07

be late for your thing.

2:32:10

I'll just leave.

2:32:12

Bye! I've

2:32:14

done my part.

2:32:16

thing. I'll just leave. I've

2:32:19

done learning his

2:32:21

part. watching!

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features