Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Released Tuesday, 25th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Why Does Hollywood Hate Its Audience? Woke-ness In Media With The Critical Drinker

Tuesday, 25th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

10:00

books, he's anything but he's very much a

10:02

flawed human with all of the weaknesses and

10:04

all of the failings that humans experience and

10:06

ultimately ends really badly for him. If they

10:08

get a third movie, I imagine they're going

10:10

to explore that very effectively. But it's

10:13

able to wrap up all of these different

10:15

ideas and explore all of these different ideas

10:17

within a compelling narrative. And I think

10:19

that's the key to storytelling with something

10:22

like Dune. I'll

10:24

give you another example of a show that I

10:26

just began season two of House

10:28

of Dragon and House of Dragon also has

10:30

something to say about, I don't

10:33

know about the patriarchy, but a historical fact

10:35

that the arc of history bends towards male

10:37

leaders and female leaders have been, have been,

10:39

have found it difficult to arrive at power.

10:41

That's part of the story of House of

10:44

Dragon. But again, I don't feel like it's

10:46

being hammered over my head to the sacrifice

10:48

of the story. I don't know how you

10:50

feel. I like House of Dragon. Yeah. No,

10:53

I think they've done a really good job with that.

10:55

And yeah, the show certainly acknowledges the fact that throughout

10:58

history, yes, traditionally men who, who lead,

11:00

who go to war. And as a

11:02

result, they become the kings of the

11:04

land and the,

11:08

the sacrifices and the

11:11

dangers that face a lot of the

11:13

female characters in this is pregnancy and

11:15

given birth. You see it certainly in

11:17

season one, like more than one female

11:20

character either passes away or experiences

11:22

great trauma through, through giving birth

11:24

and the positions that they're put

11:26

in because of that. So it

11:29

tackles it from a different point of

11:31

view, but it doesn't give you weak

11:33

characters. They're still extremely strong, interesting characters.

11:35

They're just not necessarily swinging an ax

11:37

on a battlefield and it

11:40

does it particularly well because the male characters

11:42

are not diminished and they're not made to

11:44

look like idiots in order to make the

11:46

women look better. So you've

11:49

got an interesting character, competent character

11:51

and they balance out nicely, I

11:53

think. And

11:55

in a, to your point, in a believable

11:57

way, it doesn't have to be Rey in

11:59

Star Wars. defeating men all over the battlefield.

12:02

It's a female Targaryen, completely

12:07

adept and ruthless when it comes to politics,

12:10

much more believable to her physical stature and

12:12

of course history, even though it's in a

12:14

fantasy land. It just makes it all the

12:16

much more enjoyable. Now, I asked

12:19

a nerd erotic this, I said, what should

12:21

I be watching that I'm not watching? And

12:23

so one of the things

12:25

he said is good is Shogun. I should

12:27

ask you that same question. And I did

12:29

watch Shogun, James Clavell's 1970s

12:31

book turned into

12:33

a new series right now on FX. And

12:37

again, well, I loved Shogun and this is

12:39

good because I don't think everything we talk

12:41

about has to be some indictment of something

12:44

that's been made. This is an endorsement. Now

12:46

this is right down the fairway of things

12:48

that I like. Well, I like history, I

12:50

like historical fiction, I like narrative nonfiction, I

12:53

like learning as I'm entertained. So I love

12:56

Shogun. I'd never thought about, what is it?

12:58

1600s, Japan and

13:01

the age of exploration, intersection with Western

13:03

civilization. Actually, I don't know, I love

13:05

Shogun. What do you think of it?

13:08

Fantastic show. Yeah, performances are superb, the

13:10

writing's excellent, the characters are interesting. And

13:12

it's such an interesting insight into a

13:14

culture that we don't know a huge

13:16

amount over here. It's

13:18

something that we don't have any direct experience of.

13:21

And so you learn so much as you go

13:23

through it and it's a very different, very alien

13:25

culture, but you learn the underpinnings of why they

13:27

do things the way they do and how important

13:29

honor is to them and so on. It's

13:32

fascinating, yeah. And it treats the audience with

13:34

respect. It doesn't treat them like idiots.

13:37

And it treats the characters with respect as

13:39

well and expects you to keep up with

13:41

what's going on. So yeah, for all those

13:43

reasons, Shogun is a fantastic show. I

13:47

also like what you talked about its message.

13:49

It has something to say. And it's talking

13:51

about this clash of cultures and civilizations where

13:53

one is kind of inherently selfish. That's

13:56

the Western view of his place in

13:58

the world versus the other. highest, the

14:00

highest calling in this in this civilization,

14:02

the East is duty and honor. And

14:05

what stuck out to me about that, in modern

14:07

American cinema, despite you and I talking about

14:09

this, like the message, the message that keeps shoving

14:11

message at us, in a way, it's

14:14

always the same message. It's like, be

14:16

true to yourself, you know, whatever that

14:19

is, your sexuality, your gender, it's

14:21

like, be a flower that's fully in

14:23

bloom. We keep getting that over and

14:26

over and over, no matter how much

14:28

the world tells you that you're not

14:30

supposed to flower, let your petals out. Yeah.

14:33

Yeah. A lot of the messaging now seems to

14:35

be in Hollywood movies for sure. You're

14:38

perfect the way you are. And you

14:40

just need to realize your own potential or your

14:42

own awesomeness. And the rest of the world just

14:44

needs to deal with that. You

14:47

know, the pervasive measures that you

14:49

used to get, particularly in American

14:51

cinema, was about improving yourself, like

14:53

striving to overcome odds and having

14:55

to better yourself and perhaps learn

14:57

something about yourself in the process.

14:59

You know, personal growth comes through

15:01

struggle. Whereas the message now is

15:04

you've done all the growing that you need to do and you're perfect

15:06

and it's the rest of the world who needs to adapt to you,

15:09

which is, it's not a great message

15:11

to arm people for dealing with life, I don't think,

15:13

because life does throw a lot of challenges at you

15:16

and you have to often change to adapt to that.

15:20

You know, I probably watch more

15:23

than I should be watching, Drinker. I mean, I

15:25

know this. In fact, I think I've watched so

15:28

many series and movies that just in the last

15:30

couple of weeks I decided I'm going to stop

15:32

and I'm going to go back to

15:34

reading more books, devoting more time to reading

15:36

books. And I picked, I'm reading both a

15:38

Michael Crichton book right now and a historical

15:41

nonfiction book about

15:44

Captain James Cook. But

15:47

I'm curious, do you

15:49

think there is some genre out

15:51

there that isn't well explored, that's

15:53

not fully saturated? I'm

15:56

an American. I'm from Texas.

15:58

I love westerns. I'm

16:01

going to be interviewing a little bit later this

16:04

week, Kevin Costner about Horizon. I loved Yellowstone, but

16:07

there's a lot of westerns. Do you think there's

16:09

a genre out there that's not

16:11

being explored that were you, and I know

16:13

you do write, were you

16:15

to write something new or were you to produce?

16:17

You'd be interested in mining that genre? Well,

16:22

I think we're getting to that point now

16:25

where essentially every genre that you can do

16:27

within Hollywood has been explored already. It's just

16:29

a natural result of the passage of time.

16:31

We have more and more time. There's more

16:33

and more services like studios,

16:35

streaming services that are putting out content

16:37

constantly. I think the next big

16:40

frontier for movies is going to be video

16:42

game adaptations. That is the

16:44

thing that they've tried on and off over the years.

16:46

They've had a few successes,

16:48

mostly failures, because they didn't know how to

16:50

do it right. Only in the

16:52

past few years have they really started to crack

16:54

it. I think once they

16:56

do, you have got

16:59

decades and decades worth of hugely

17:01

popular video games with enormous audiences.

17:05

The amount of money in that

17:07

industry dwarfs Hollywood easily. So when

17:09

they find the way to properly

17:11

adapt those, that's

17:13

going to be the next superhero craze. As

17:16

much as superheroes rode the box office for the past

17:18

10 years, I think video game adaptations are probably going

17:20

to be the next thing. Well,

17:23

give me an example though. Like Call

17:25

of Duty. What would you turn in? What would be

17:27

some great ones that would be turned into movies? Right.

17:30

I mean, there's things that they have

17:33

tried unsuccessfully. For example, the

17:35

Tomb Raider games, hugely popular. They've never quite cracked

17:37

it in terms of the actress, the director, that

17:39

sort of thing. Angelina Jolie had a good shot

17:41

at it. The Resident

17:43

Evil series, they have failed consistently with that. But

17:46

my goodness, if they ever get it right, they've

17:48

got a gold mine on their hands. Yeah,

17:51

probably you could make a decent movie out

17:53

of the Call of Duty games as well.

17:55

Just a straight up action thriller with lots

17:57

of espionage stuff going on. Pretty

17:59

easy stuff. So pretty adaptable. Same

18:02

thing with the sci-fi stuff, like the Halo series.

18:04

They tried to turn that into a TV show.

18:06

I don't think it's been particularly popular. But if

18:08

they actually find a way to do it right,

18:11

again, it's a goldmine. They've pretty much succeeded

18:13

with The Last of Us. That's

18:15

been a pretty popular show on HBO. So

18:18

we'll see what they do with season two, because that

18:20

could be a tricky one. You know the games.

18:24

Yeah. It's funny,

18:26

I'm not a huge gamer. So I didn't even know The Last of

18:28

Us was a game, but I did watch the series on

18:30

HBO. I think that's

18:33

a great, I mean, you're absolutely

18:35

right. See, but

18:37

to some extent, that's a reflection

18:40

of capitalism and marketing that you're

18:42

going to play into existing characters.

18:44

It's smart, right? You

18:46

want to sell the audience something you know

18:48

the audience already likes, and that would be

18:50

video games. It's also a little bit of

18:52

a crutch and reflects, I think, the lack

18:54

of creativity in coming up with something new.

18:56

I don't fault them. I

18:59

mean, a successful Halo series

19:01

would be gangbusters, but

19:05

I also would just like to see a little more creativity

19:08

of coming up with something new that

19:10

I would like to believe is still in Hollywood. Yeah.

19:14

It's partly, well, it's very much a problem

19:16

of money, because if you're going to drop

19:18

$200, $300 million on

19:20

a movie or a TV show, you need to

19:22

be pretty sure that that money is going to

19:24

pay off. That the gamble is going to pay

19:26

off, and you're going to get your investment back,

19:28

because it's a lot to drop. And so that's

19:31

why they take on these supposedly safe bets. That's

19:33

why you see so many remakes of old shows

19:35

or old movies, trying to capitalize

19:37

on that existing fan base and take

19:40

the road that's well-traveled, you know, that

19:42

they think will be successful again. Doesn't

19:45

always work, because people are not too keen

19:47

on remakes generally, but they keep trying. And

19:49

I think, yeah, again, video games would be

19:51

a reflection of that, that trying to have

19:53

a safe bet. You

19:57

have that video up on your YouTube channel, Critical

19:59

Drink, you're talking about. I

26:00

can spend a lot of time talking about what's not good

26:02

and I don't want to watch what's not good. I'm not

26:04

going to watch Star Wars, act like. And

26:06

it's not a protest, it's about time

26:08

and investment. Why would I

26:10

give my time to it? So

26:12

what should I be that I might not be watching right

26:15

now, Will? Well, you're already watching

26:17

House of the Dragons, so that's definitely a

26:19

good start. The

26:21

Gentleman on, I think it's

26:23

Netflix, it's the Guy Ritchie show. It's based kind

26:25

of an offshoot of the movie that he did.

26:29

Again, a really good one. If you like

26:31

those sort of Guy Ritchie, lock stock in

26:33

Two Smoking Barrels or Snatch, that sort of

26:35

thing. It's great stuff. It's really funny, really

26:38

complex storytelling with lots of

26:41

betrayals and stuff and great

26:43

well-written characters. So that's a good one. And

26:46

probably Cobra Kai as well. That is a personal favorite

26:48

of mine. It's been going a few years now. I

26:50

think this is the last season this year. Tremendously

26:53

entertaining, brilliantly funny, a

26:57

great continuation of that Karate

27:00

Kid franchise from the

27:02

80s. Somehow they found a way to bring

27:04

it into the modern day but still keep

27:06

the beating heart of it going. And yeah,

27:08

I really enjoy that. I'm

27:11

on a good path. I've watched them both. Okay, last

27:13

two questions about the industry real quick. So

27:17

I've seen you talk about this on your channel. There's

27:20

no movie stars anymore. And this has been a while

27:22

in the making. I don't know

27:24

when we had our last movie star, when the last

27:26

one was built. Entertainment

27:28

is fractured. But what I find

27:30

fascinating about this, it's not just that

27:32

we don't have movie stars. It's almost

27:35

as though talent is interchangeable. You have a

27:37

very short shelf life as a movie star,

27:39

a quote unquote movie star, a leading man,

27:41

whatever it may be. But

27:44

I'm curious as to why. Because

27:47

when you see content fractured up,

27:50

this extends to what you do for a living now

27:52

and what I do as well. It

27:54

actually lends power back to the quote unquote

27:56

talent. I hate that word, but

27:59

it does because because the power shifts

28:01

away from the distributor. When there's just

28:03

a couple of distributors, they have all the power about who

28:05

will be stars and who will not be stars, right? But

28:08

now that the power's in the content

28:10

creator's hands, it makes them even more

28:12

valuable. I think you see that,

28:14

for example, by the way, in the news is

28:16

Stephen A. Smith's been offered $18

28:18

million by ESPN, and that's an opening

28:20

offer. So I'm just curious,

28:23

like, well then,

28:25

where's the money going if they don't

28:27

appreciate stars in content?

28:29

Is it showrunners? It's definitely

28:31

got to shift to the content creator. So

28:34

where are the stars? I

28:37

think the stars kind of vanished, particularly

28:39

with the advent of the

28:41

superhero movies that really just took over cinema

28:44

for such a long time, because people were

28:46

no longer going to the cinema to see

28:48

their favorite movie star, they were going to

28:50

see their favorite character. And

28:52

so that's a very big difference. And

28:54

when you have that, you essentially nullify the

28:56

need for a movie star. You just need

28:59

an actor who can play that character, and

29:01

that's what people are interested in seeing. And

29:04

we've kind of never gotten out

29:06

of that slump. And I don't know if

29:08

we will. And the other

29:10

part of the equation, I suppose, is

29:12

that things like social media have made

29:14

movie stars a lot more accessible, which

29:17

is not necessarily a good thing, because

29:20

they used to have a mystique. We'll find out who they are. Yeah,

29:23

exactly. We get to see who they really are. And

29:25

a lot of the time, they're not people that we

29:27

really want to know anymore about. That's

29:30

disappointing, but it robs them of them mystique, and

29:32

it robs them of their intrigue

29:34

and their star power, because they're just

29:36

humans like us. And we get

29:38

to hear every mundane thought that they have, and

29:41

it's often not very inspiring. So those two things

29:43

have kind of crippled the concept of the movie

29:45

star, sadly. All

29:47

right, finally, you've got another video up

29:50

about this, and we started our conversation here. They

29:53

keep blaming their problems on the audience. It's

29:56

almost as though it's intentional. Is

29:59

it intentional? this concept of fan baiting.

30:02

Is all the controversy and making the

30:04

audience mad part of marketing? Yeah,

30:07

apparently it is. I've seen various

30:10

reports about this, people trying to do

30:12

like expose on it and trying to

30:14

describe how the industry works. And I

30:16

think for certain studios, it's become standard

30:18

practice where they will intentionally make

30:21

a big song and dance about the fact

30:23

that they've changed the race and gender of

30:25

sexuality of certain characters in their new project.

30:28

They know that the fans would be unhappy

30:30

about that because it's disrespecting the source material.

30:33

They then parlay that into it

30:35

being motivated by racism or sexism,

30:37

bigotry, whatever. And they

30:40

could use that to garner sympathetic coverage from

30:42

the media and a big old storm of

30:44

controversy that gets lots of people talking about

30:46

their project. So it's essentially free marketing. It's

30:48

done in the dirtiest and most unpleasant way

30:50

possible. But it's effective. So

30:53

yeah, that's what they've been doing in a lot of cases. All

30:58

right, well, good luck. By the way, I'm taking

31:00

it as Scotland. You're rooting for

31:02

Scotland for a little while. Well, I did until they

31:04

got pooners over the weekend. Right. So

31:08

out of curiosity, do you shift any allegiance

31:10

at all to England at that point? Or

31:13

like what's the modern day relationship between Scotland and England?

31:15

Is it William Wallace still? Or are you going to

31:17

root for England? This is going to

31:19

get me hunted down in Scotland, like if I

31:21

say this. But yeah, a little bit to some

31:23

extent because there's still a British side. So OK,

31:25

they're close enough. Yeah, I know it's England. Yeah,

31:27

I know they can be real annoying about it

31:29

at times. But I guess I would rather they

31:31

won than someone like Italy

31:33

or France or whatever. So yeah,

31:35

I'll reluctantly shift my support to

31:37

England now. OK,

31:39

all right. All

31:42

right, man, critical drinker. Will Jordan,

31:44

thanks so much, man. We'll check you out on YouTube. Everybody should

31:46

check him out. If you ever have a piece of content that

31:48

you're curious about, should I watch this? Or why is it so

31:50

bad? He's going to be your man to tell you. Appreciate

31:53

it so much, Will. Thank you. Thanks,

31:56

Will. All

31:58

right, there he goes. Critical drinker here on the team. the Wilkain

32:00

Show. You heard me mention it. The

32:03

snobbiness of this Eurocentric view makes

32:05

me even more like I want

32:07

Donald Trump to bust in to

32:10

the country club. So here's the question. Do

32:13

you want a president you'd rather have a beer with or

32:15

a president who's the boss next

32:17

on the Wilkain Show? Visit

32:30

www. or

32:33

wherever you listen to your podcasts. And don't forget to spread the

32:35

sunshine. Would

32:47

you rather have a president with whom you'd like to

32:50

have a beer, or would you rather

32:53

have a president who is the boss? It is the Wilkain

32:55

Show streaming live at foxnews.com on

32:58

Instagram and on terrestrial radio as well as

33:01

at Youtube and Facebook at the Fox News pages.

33:03

But you can always catch the Wilkain Show on

33:05

demand by hitting Subscribe if you're listening in audio

33:07

format. Just head over to Apple or Spotify right

33:10

now and hit Subscribe if you're watching on

33:12

Youtube or Facebook. Just find us. It's in the description

33:15

of this live stream. You can hit Subscribe. Join

33:17

the Wilkain Show community. There's nothing to illustrate. A

33:19

guy you'd like to have a beer with more

33:22

than someone who uses the word whom.

33:25

Would you rather have a president with whom you'd

33:28

like to have a beer with or who's the

33:30

boss? Paul Scallis runs

33:34

a sub-stack and he's been

33:36

a guest here on the Wilkain Show and

33:38

his ex-handle is Lindy Man. He talks about

33:40

the concept of Lindy a lot. Lindy is

33:42

the idea that if

33:45

something has survived the test of

33:47

human trial and error, if

33:49

something is a tradition, if it's been around

33:51

for hundreds and certainly in the case thousands

33:55

of years, it has by

33:57

its very inherent survival value.

34:00

And that's absolutely true. That's part of the

34:02

conservative nature, by the way. You

34:04

don't just wake up with every

34:06

generation and these days, every couple years thinking,

34:08

oh, I can perfect humanity, ignoring,

34:11

what a small speck, not just in

34:13

the universe, but on the timeline you

34:15

actually are. Literally, something that's been around

34:17

for thousands of years has value. Now,

34:19

that is not to say, because it's

34:21

been around for thousands of years, we

34:24

just defer and continue,

34:26

I give you slavery. But,

34:29

it also, slavery is

34:31

an interesting thing to study. Martyr

34:34

Maid, Darrell Cooper has a long series,

34:37

podcast, 10 part series about

34:39

the history of slavery, because once again, in our

34:41

own hubris, like our

34:44

own lack of humility, we think slavery was

34:46

invented in America, or maybe

34:48

in the Caribbean. And we're the

34:50

first to ever have

34:52

slavery. Slavery has been around forever,

34:55

by the way, in various forms.

34:57

And here's something controversial, yet historically

34:59

true. Slavery was an advancement

35:01

in human civilization. The first form of slavery

35:03

was when you conquered another village, you conquered

35:06

another tribe, you took them

35:08

as slaves. But the truth is, prior to taking

35:10

them as slaves, do you know what you did

35:12

when you conquered another village, you conquered another tribe?

35:15

Murder, you killed everyone in the village.

35:17

When there was some economic value to

35:20

the vanquished, then they became slaves.

35:23

And this is on and on through

35:25

civilization, and tribe after tribe, and thousands

35:27

of years. But still,

35:30

the point there is to think of yourself as a little bit

35:32

more than the master of the universe

35:34

in your small little 20 year

35:37

vision of humanity. If it's been

35:39

around forever, then it

35:41

might consider, it might

35:43

deserve some consideration. Well, with

35:46

that backdrop, Lindyman, who constantly thinks about how is

35:48

this work in

35:51

the whole grand scheme of humanity,

35:53

asks, would you rather have a leader,

35:57

a president, that you want to have a beer with,

35:59

or? leader who's the boss. He

36:02

points back to a video about

36:04

a year ago of Ron DeSantis, Governor of

36:06

Florida, having a beer. You

36:09

know, a Coors Light. Awkwardly, if

36:11

we're being honest, Ron

36:14

DeSantis stands have found themselves among the most sensitive

36:16

in the political sphere. You can't point out the

36:18

obvious truths even when you like Ron DeSantis. And

36:20

I really like Ron DeSantis. But

36:23

it's awkward him attempting to have the beer with

36:25

a constituency. And he

36:27

writes, one of the things that makes Trump successful

36:31

is he is always in CEO

36:33

boss mode, even when

36:35

campaigning in public. The citizens act like

36:37

employees and they are grateful their boss

36:39

is being nice to him. Most

36:41

politicians try to be one of the regular

36:43

guys and it looks awkward. Trump

36:46

is just the boss and most people

36:48

have a boss and act accordingly.

36:51

Now let's state the obvious. You

36:54

don't work for the President of the United

36:56

States. The President of the United States works

36:59

for you, the American. These are public servants

37:01

and that's the proper view of public

37:03

service. Still, we

37:05

can understand as part of that public

37:07

service, you become the most powerful man

37:10

in the world, certainly when it comes to the

37:12

presidency. And that's gonna come with

37:14

it some aura

37:18

of the boss. That way for every leader

37:20

for thousands of years, from

37:22

emperors and generals to prime

37:24

ministers and presidents, they're

37:27

certainly, despite the fact that they work

37:29

for us, the aura of the

37:31

boss. So why do we try to like have

37:34

this pretense that they're the

37:36

everyman, you know? Well I think

37:38

the answer honestly is you want a bit of both

37:40

and you never want neither. I mean

37:43

look, Biden and Hillary Clinton are clearly neither.

37:45

That's not partisan. You don't want to have

37:47

a beer and you don't feel like they're the boss.

37:50

Certainly with Biden. Maybe you could tell yourself

37:52

that Hillary Clinton was some form of girl

37:54

boss. But

37:57

Donald Trump actually pulls off both. It's

37:59

true. He gives off boss

38:01

vibe. You walk into any room

38:04

and he is the boss. He

38:07

just did the All In podcast, which is huge,

38:09

Silicon Valley. I don't know about billionaires, but

38:13

maybe, but definitely hundred millionaires.

38:15

David Sachs, Chamath Palapatiya, Jason

38:17

Calcanis and Siskis

38:19

Hassel Podcast, the All In podcast. They all wore

38:21

suits. They never wear suits. They

38:24

all wore suits to match the

38:26

boss, to interview Donald Trump. But

38:29

I've been around him. It's interesting.

38:32

There is that aura, but he also wants you

38:34

to be happy. He's like the ultimate host. Like

38:37

he's, how's your food? How you doing? You

38:41

know, it's this,

38:44

and jokes and laughs and

38:47

is in on the joke. He even

38:49

laughs at himself in some ways. It's

38:52

a very much of a guy vibe, if you know what I

38:54

mean. And as

38:57

such, you know, kind of an

38:59

every man. Not awkward, not holding

39:01

himself out above, but yet stands

39:04

somewhat above. He's pulled off this

39:06

ability to be both. And if you haven't met

39:08

him, I would understand. And

39:11

this isn't like, oh, I've met Donald. No, I'm

39:13

just saying if you haven't met him, I'd understand if you only

39:15

see the boss version. But look at some

39:17

of the videos when he walks into a Dairy Queen. When

39:20

he walks into Tony and Nick's, you

39:22

know, cheesesteaks in Philadelphia. That's

39:25

not, you know, an emperor

39:28

asking you to kiss the cloak. That's

39:30

him polling people. Hey, what do we

39:32

think of vice presidency?

39:34

Who do you think? Oh, okay. You

39:37

like JD Vance? Oh,

39:39

you like Vivek? Okay. You know, he's, and

39:41

he's interested. He's not just doing it. He's

39:43

interested in hearing him. I

39:47

mean, it's like the difference

39:49

between talking at and talking with people. And

39:51

I think that

39:56

the true thing we're trying

39:58

to decide here what's

40:00

real what's authentic

40:04

don't pretend to be an everyman don't pretend to

40:06

drink Coors Lights with me if

40:08

you don't drink Coors Lights with

40:11

the people don't

40:13

pretend to be the boss if you've never

40:16

been the boss that's like Michael

40:19

Dukakis wearing a helmet on the back of

40:21

a tank didn't fit didn't feel authentic in

40:25

the end it's just got to be real and for Donald Trump

40:27

it's real to be like one

40:29

of the guys and the boss so who

40:32

do you want to be your president you

40:36

want the guy to be real and right now

40:38

for the moment in time I don't think

40:40

we really need someone to have a beer with

40:43

I we really need somebody competent to take charge

40:46

and to be the boss it's

40:49

okay to root for America it is

40:52

even when it's against my own personal team's

40:54

interests it's okay if you thought

40:56

Boston Celtics winning NBA

40:58

Finals was a win for America and

41:01

Michael Phelps ready to fight for America that's

41:03

next on the Will Cain Show a

41:17

win for America the Boston

41:19

Celtics over the Dallas Mavericks USA

41:22

it is the Will Cain Show streaming live at Fox

41:25

news.com on the Fox News YouTube channel the Fox News

41:27

Facebook page we'd love it if

41:29

you'd leave us a comment leave

41:31

us a review five stars if you think it's so deserved

41:34

but most importantly join the Will Cain Show

41:36

community subscribe on Apple or Spotify subscribe on

41:38

YouTube jump into the comment section and jump

41:40

in to the Will Cain Show

41:42

we need to send out a congratulations by

41:45

the way to our producer tinfoil Pat his

41:47

Florida Panthers are the NHL

41:50

champion tinfoil

41:52

really quickly want to ask you this exuberance

41:56

like like feel like

41:58

a champion today or relief feel like you

42:00

avoided being a loser. Because choking up a

42:03

3-0 lead would have

42:05

been historical. Like the worst, the worst thing

42:07

in the world. The Oilers came back after

42:09

Panthers were up 3-0 to tie it 3-3.

42:13

And that would have, you know like for

42:15

the Mavericks losing to the Celtics, for me, I

42:17

really didn't want to be somebody that was swept. To

42:20

be honest, I take a little bit of pride in that one game.

42:23

You don't want to go down the history books. And you

42:25

would have been page one in the worst form of

42:27

losing in the history books. So exuberance

42:29

or relief that you're the NHL or

42:31

the Stanley Cup champion? I

42:34

mean, during the game, you know, I could

42:36

just feel it slipping away, even with the

42:38

one goal lead. But

42:41

once it hits, you know, zeros, it's

42:43

exuberance all the way. I mean, the

42:47

Stanley Cup, winning the Stanley Cup and seeing it

42:49

lifted up, it's just

42:51

a different feeling. I don't know. You

42:53

can't, it gets past

42:55

that feeling of relief. Yeah, but it would have been bad. It

42:58

would have been bad. It would have been bad.

43:00

It would have been real bad. I

43:03

mean, you know, Bill Simmons used to

43:06

write a column, levels of losing. I

43:08

think it would have reached the apex,

43:10

like the worst level of losing. By

43:13

the way, as we're talking about championships here, we're

43:17

going to put a button on my Dallas Mavericks

43:19

losing to the Boston Celtics. But I was listening

43:21

to Dallas Sports Talk radio the other day, and

43:23

they were real mad about former NBA player Nick

43:25

Young saying that the

43:27

Celtics being the Mavs was a win

43:29

for America. Here, I want you

43:31

to listen to what Nick Young had to say

43:34

about the Celtics versus the Mavs and

43:36

Jason Tatum and Jalen Brown versus Luca

43:38

Doncic. Here's former NBA player, Nick Young.

43:43

Cause we won, baby. America won,

43:45

baby. Jason Tatum, Jalen Brown did

43:48

it for America. They

43:50

put Luca out. Oh

43:53

my God. I

43:55

got so tired of everybody talking

43:57

about these foreigners and America. America's

44:00

here, baby. It's America's league, baby. It's

44:02

America's league. I hope y'all see it.

44:04

Save them here, motherfucker. Bam. That's Nick

44:06

Young. And you know how

44:08

I like regionalism, you know? I probably like

44:11

cities over states and states over countries and

44:13

countries over globalists. But

44:23

the guys in Dallas were super mad about this because, you

44:25

know, we ride with Luca. But

44:27

I actually get it. Like if you're not a

44:29

Mavericks fan, you know, I think

44:32

it's perfectly fine to celebrate the Celtics

44:34

over the Mavs, to root for Boston

44:36

over Dallas in this case because their

44:38

best players in Boston are Americans. Now

44:40

– and Dallas' best player is from

44:43

Slovenia. Now let me say, there has

44:45

been this racial tension going on. We talked about it

44:47

here with Andy Murray on the Friday

44:49

edition of Canon Sports. There is definitely a racial

44:51

component that – where,

44:53

you know, the NBA is supposed to be

44:56

black and the best players can't be, you

44:58

know, Nikola Jokic and Luca Doncic. And that

45:00

was Gilbert Arenas' show, by the way. And

45:02

Gilbert Arenas, I think, has said something like

45:04

that. So that's

45:06

different. I'm not into the racial identity

45:09

politics, tribalism of basketball. But

45:12

national tribalism and politics? Yeah, absolutely.

45:15

We invented basketball. Come on,

45:17

peach baskets. It's okay. Two

45:20

a days, tin foil. I'm okay with this. Like,

45:23

you know, Young Establishment James is a

45:25

Celtics fan, but just take random dude

45:27

from Jacksonville, by the way.

45:29

I heard Jacksonville described as America's pawn shop.

45:31

Like, if pawn shops were a city, it

45:34

would be Jacksonville. Wow.

45:37

It's true. Which tin foil –

45:39

tin foil lives in Jacksonville. But

45:42

random dude from Jacksonville. I

45:44

think you can look at the Celtics over the Mavs and say,

45:47

win for America. Do you guys disagree? I'm

45:50

a little biased. I don't like Boston sports, being

45:52

a New York sports fan. But like

45:55

I said, I was rooting for the Mavs. I

45:57

like the Mavs. So I don't

45:59

know. It's a tough call, but you know,

46:02

it's a win for America, I would say. Yeah.

46:05

Mavs best player from Slovenia, Celtics

46:07

best players from America. I don't

46:09

mind somebody celebrating that tin foil.

46:12

It gets a, it gets a little confusing. Um,

46:15

because like yesterday to bring the

46:17

Panthers back into this, they

46:19

beat the Canadian team, kept

46:22

the 31 year streak going where we

46:24

have the cup in America. But

46:27

our captain is finished. So, I mean,

46:30

you know, where do you draw? I don't know where you draw the line. Well,

46:34

hockey's going to be tough. Yeah. Players and,

46:36

and, uh, you know, but, but I do

46:38

think, yeah, I mean, as long

46:41

as the Raptors don't win it, I, you know,

46:43

I think that it's a win for America overall

46:45

in general, and then you go down to

46:47

players. Yeah.

46:50

Well, look, good luck getting an all American hockey

46:52

team. If Rachel can't post stuff, he made the

46:54

argument to me that hockey was the most patriotic

46:56

sport this past weekend. I mean,

46:59

patriotic for who? For Canada, for Finland. Like, what

47:01

are we talking about here? How many Americans, what

47:03

is it? 30% is 30% of the ice American

47:05

at this point. Like

47:08

if I take a random selection of

47:11

hockey players skating on the ice at

47:13

any given moment, what percentage is

47:15

American? I'm going to put the over under 35%. What

47:18

I'm, what I'm looking at right now, I take the under what I'm looking

47:21

at right now is 29.3% of the league is American. Pretty

47:25

good. The US born. I

47:30

am so okay with nationalism. Like what

47:32

is wrong with it? I'm okay. And

47:34

this is part of what I like

47:36

about sports. Like again, back to the

47:39

Euro 2024 and the Copa America. I

47:41

mean, it's awesome. We get to root

47:43

for the red, white, and blue. And

47:45

I know there's going to be anti-soccer

47:47

guy out there and anti-soccer guys, even

47:49

on this show, multiple anti-soccer guys on

47:51

this show, but what an awesome opportunity to root for

47:53

the red, white, and blue. And

47:56

also by the way, anti-soccer guy is also

47:58

anti-Olympic guy. Huge crawler. crossover and

48:00

I like both. I like Olympics

48:02

and soccer.

48:05

And we got the Olympics in a few months. This

48:07

is partly because I played an Olympic sport growing up,

48:10

you know, for swimming and water polo. And

48:13

this caught my attention. Michael Phelps

48:15

just being so pro-America. He was

48:18

shown a video, of course, you

48:20

know, America's greatest all-time swimmer. I

48:22

mean, up there, by the way, in any Mount Rushmore

48:24

of great athletes. It's just fact, the way he dominated.

48:29

Was shown a video by this Australians when we're

48:31

talking this way about America. I want you to

48:33

listen to Phelps's reaction. So

48:35

much sweeter beating America. Yeah. Particularly

48:38

the first night of competition where

48:40

we did not have to hear

48:43

star spangled banner ring out through

48:45

the stadium. And I cannot tell

48:47

you how happy that made me.

48:49

So for the Americans, if

48:52

you see what I just saw, that's the first time I saw

48:54

it. I would watch that thing every single

48:56

day to give me that

48:58

little extra bit of just, I mean, I'm

49:03

yeah, that, that's

49:06

awesome. Well, the good news

49:08

is the Olympics will be here

49:10

shortly and we'll be able to see what the results

49:12

are. Well,

49:15

what's fun about that video and we edited it just

49:18

a little bit for time, but my favorite part and

49:20

it wouldn't play in audio is when

49:22

he's watching the video, it's his

49:24

facial expressions. It's authentic, like random

49:26

eyebrow raises, random like force upside

49:29

down smiles. You know, the ones

49:31

that aren't real smiles, more

49:34

like smiles right before you stab someone in

49:37

medieval Europe. He's legit not happy. And she

49:39

would just going on on like, I hate

49:41

USA USA chance. I never want to hear

49:44

the star spangled banner. They're cowbells and that's

49:46

awesome. She's Australian. So be pro Australian. That's

49:48

great. And that's a bit of a swimming

49:50

rivalry because it's the two best in the

49:53

world. Used to

49:55

be US and Russia. Now

49:57

it's US and Australia and has been for. 20

50:00

plus years, but um He's

50:03

legit like he's mad and

50:05

I love it and I love

50:07

to see that Ride

50:11

or die for the red white and blue USA

50:14

makes me want to watch the Olympics

50:16

even more and I don't begrudge that

50:18

Australian whatever her name is as she

50:22

Ticks off the greatest swimmer of all time

50:24

who will not be in the water, but

50:26

might just motivate other Americans. It's okay To

50:30

root for America. All right That's gonna do

50:32

it for us today here on the Wil

50:34

Kane show always love hanging out with you

50:36

Hope to see you again tomorrow in order

50:38

to ensure that we do so subscribe Apple

50:40

Spotify YouTube. I'll see you again next time Listen

50:57

ad free with a Fox News podcast

50:59

plus subscription on Apple podcast and Amazon

51:03

Prime members you can listen to this

51:05

show ad free on the Amazon music

51:07

app From the

51:09

Fox News Podcasts Network. Subscribe and

51:11

listen to the Trey Gowdy Podcast.

51:14

Former federal prosecutor and four-term US

51:16

congressman from South Carolina brings you

51:18

a one-of-a-kind podcast. Subscribe and listen

51:20

now by going to foxnewspodcasts.com.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features