Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
10:00
books, he's anything but he's very much a
10:02
flawed human with all of the weaknesses and
10:04
all of the failings that humans experience and
10:06
ultimately ends really badly for him. If they
10:08
get a third movie, I imagine they're going
10:10
to explore that very effectively. But it's
10:13
able to wrap up all of these different
10:15
ideas and explore all of these different ideas
10:17
within a compelling narrative. And I think
10:19
that's the key to storytelling with something
10:22
like Dune. I'll
10:24
give you another example of a show that I
10:26
just began season two of House
10:28
of Dragon and House of Dragon also has
10:30
something to say about, I don't
10:33
know about the patriarchy, but a historical fact
10:35
that the arc of history bends towards male
10:37
leaders and female leaders have been, have been,
10:39
have found it difficult to arrive at power.
10:41
That's part of the story of House of
10:44
Dragon. But again, I don't feel like it's
10:46
being hammered over my head to the sacrifice
10:48
of the story. I don't know how you
10:50
feel. I like House of Dragon. Yeah. No,
10:53
I think they've done a really good job with that.
10:55
And yeah, the show certainly acknowledges the fact that throughout
10:58
history, yes, traditionally men who, who lead,
11:00
who go to war. And as a
11:02
result, they become the kings of the
11:04
land and the,
11:08
the sacrifices and the
11:11
dangers that face a lot of the
11:13
female characters in this is pregnancy and
11:15
given birth. You see it certainly in
11:17
season one, like more than one female
11:20
character either passes away or experiences
11:22
great trauma through, through giving birth
11:24
and the positions that they're put
11:26
in because of that. So it
11:29
tackles it from a different point of
11:31
view, but it doesn't give you weak
11:33
characters. They're still extremely strong, interesting characters.
11:35
They're just not necessarily swinging an ax
11:37
on a battlefield and it
11:40
does it particularly well because the male characters
11:42
are not diminished and they're not made to
11:44
look like idiots in order to make the
11:46
women look better. So you've
11:49
got an interesting character, competent character
11:51
and they balance out nicely, I
11:53
think. And
11:55
in a, to your point, in a believable
11:57
way, it doesn't have to be Rey in
11:59
Star Wars. defeating men all over the battlefield.
12:02
It's a female Targaryen, completely
12:07
adept and ruthless when it comes to politics,
12:10
much more believable to her physical stature and
12:12
of course history, even though it's in a
12:14
fantasy land. It just makes it all the
12:16
much more enjoyable. Now, I asked
12:19
a nerd erotic this, I said, what should
12:21
I be watching that I'm not watching? And
12:23
so one of the things
12:25
he said is good is Shogun. I should
12:27
ask you that same question. And I did
12:29
watch Shogun, James Clavell's 1970s
12:31
book turned into
12:33
a new series right now on FX. And
12:37
again, well, I loved Shogun and this is
12:39
good because I don't think everything we talk
12:41
about has to be some indictment of something
12:44
that's been made. This is an endorsement. Now
12:46
this is right down the fairway of things
12:48
that I like. Well, I like history, I
12:50
like historical fiction, I like narrative nonfiction, I
12:53
like learning as I'm entertained. So I love
12:56
Shogun. I'd never thought about, what is it?
12:58
1600s, Japan and
13:01
the age of exploration, intersection with Western
13:03
civilization. Actually, I don't know, I love
13:05
Shogun. What do you think of it?
13:08
Fantastic show. Yeah, performances are superb, the
13:10
writing's excellent, the characters are interesting. And
13:12
it's such an interesting insight into a
13:14
culture that we don't know a huge
13:16
amount over here. It's
13:18
something that we don't have any direct experience of.
13:21
And so you learn so much as you go
13:23
through it and it's a very different, very alien
13:25
culture, but you learn the underpinnings of why they
13:27
do things the way they do and how important
13:29
honor is to them and so on. It's
13:32
fascinating, yeah. And it treats the audience with
13:34
respect. It doesn't treat them like idiots.
13:37
And it treats the characters with respect as
13:39
well and expects you to keep up with
13:41
what's going on. So yeah, for all those
13:43
reasons, Shogun is a fantastic show. I
13:47
also like what you talked about its message.
13:49
It has something to say. And it's talking
13:51
about this clash of cultures and civilizations where
13:53
one is kind of inherently selfish. That's
13:56
the Western view of his place in
13:58
the world versus the other. highest, the
14:00
highest calling in this in this civilization,
14:02
the East is duty and honor. And
14:05
what stuck out to me about that, in modern
14:07
American cinema, despite you and I talking about
14:09
this, like the message, the message that keeps shoving
14:11
message at us, in a way, it's
14:14
always the same message. It's like, be
14:16
true to yourself, you know, whatever that
14:19
is, your sexuality, your gender, it's
14:21
like, be a flower that's fully in
14:23
bloom. We keep getting that over and
14:26
over and over, no matter how much
14:28
the world tells you that you're not
14:30
supposed to flower, let your petals out. Yeah.
14:33
Yeah. A lot of the messaging now seems to
14:35
be in Hollywood movies for sure. You're
14:38
perfect the way you are. And you
14:40
just need to realize your own potential or your
14:42
own awesomeness. And the rest of the world just
14:44
needs to deal with that. You
14:47
know, the pervasive measures that you
14:49
used to get, particularly in American
14:51
cinema, was about improving yourself, like
14:53
striving to overcome odds and having
14:55
to better yourself and perhaps learn
14:57
something about yourself in the process.
14:59
You know, personal growth comes through
15:01
struggle. Whereas the message now is
15:04
you've done all the growing that you need to do and you're perfect
15:06
and it's the rest of the world who needs to adapt to you,
15:09
which is, it's not a great message
15:11
to arm people for dealing with life, I don't think,
15:13
because life does throw a lot of challenges at you
15:16
and you have to often change to adapt to that.
15:20
You know, I probably watch more
15:23
than I should be watching, Drinker. I mean, I
15:25
know this. In fact, I think I've watched so
15:28
many series and movies that just in the last
15:30
couple of weeks I decided I'm going to stop
15:32
and I'm going to go back to
15:34
reading more books, devoting more time to reading
15:36
books. And I picked, I'm reading both a
15:38
Michael Crichton book right now and a historical
15:41
nonfiction book about
15:44
Captain James Cook. But
15:47
I'm curious, do you
15:49
think there is some genre out
15:51
there that isn't well explored, that's
15:53
not fully saturated? I'm
15:56
an American. I'm from Texas.
15:58
I love westerns. I'm
16:01
going to be interviewing a little bit later this
16:04
week, Kevin Costner about Horizon. I loved Yellowstone, but
16:07
there's a lot of westerns. Do you think there's
16:09
a genre out there that's not
16:11
being explored that were you, and I know
16:13
you do write, were you
16:15
to write something new or were you to produce?
16:17
You'd be interested in mining that genre? Well,
16:22
I think we're getting to that point now
16:25
where essentially every genre that you can do
16:27
within Hollywood has been explored already. It's just
16:29
a natural result of the passage of time.
16:31
We have more and more time. There's more
16:33
and more services like studios,
16:35
streaming services that are putting out content
16:37
constantly. I think the next big
16:40
frontier for movies is going to be video
16:42
game adaptations. That is the
16:44
thing that they've tried on and off over the years.
16:46
They've had a few successes,
16:48
mostly failures, because they didn't know how to
16:50
do it right. Only in the
16:52
past few years have they really started to crack
16:54
it. I think once they
16:56
do, you have got
16:59
decades and decades worth of hugely
17:01
popular video games with enormous audiences.
17:05
The amount of money in that
17:07
industry dwarfs Hollywood easily. So when
17:09
they find the way to properly
17:11
adapt those, that's
17:13
going to be the next superhero craze. As
17:16
much as superheroes rode the box office for the past
17:18
10 years, I think video game adaptations are probably going
17:20
to be the next thing. Well,
17:23
give me an example though. Like Call
17:25
of Duty. What would you turn in? What would be
17:27
some great ones that would be turned into movies? Right.
17:30
I mean, there's things that they have
17:33
tried unsuccessfully. For example, the
17:35
Tomb Raider games, hugely popular. They've never quite cracked
17:37
it in terms of the actress, the director, that
17:39
sort of thing. Angelina Jolie had a good shot
17:41
at it. The Resident
17:43
Evil series, they have failed consistently with that. But
17:46
my goodness, if they ever get it right, they've
17:48
got a gold mine on their hands. Yeah,
17:51
probably you could make a decent movie out
17:53
of the Call of Duty games as well.
17:55
Just a straight up action thriller with lots
17:57
of espionage stuff going on. Pretty
17:59
easy stuff. So pretty adaptable. Same
18:02
thing with the sci-fi stuff, like the Halo series.
18:04
They tried to turn that into a TV show.
18:06
I don't think it's been particularly popular. But if
18:08
they actually find a way to do it right,
18:11
again, it's a goldmine. They've pretty much succeeded
18:13
with The Last of Us. That's
18:15
been a pretty popular show on HBO. So
18:18
we'll see what they do with season two, because that
18:20
could be a tricky one. You know the games.
18:24
Yeah. It's funny,
18:26
I'm not a huge gamer. So I didn't even know The Last of
18:28
Us was a game, but I did watch the series on
18:30
HBO. I think that's
18:33
a great, I mean, you're absolutely
18:35
right. See, but
18:37
to some extent, that's a reflection
18:40
of capitalism and marketing that you're
18:42
going to play into existing characters.
18:44
It's smart, right? You
18:46
want to sell the audience something you know
18:48
the audience already likes, and that would be
18:50
video games. It's also a little bit of
18:52
a crutch and reflects, I think, the lack
18:54
of creativity in coming up with something new.
18:56
I don't fault them. I
18:59
mean, a successful Halo series
19:01
would be gangbusters, but
19:05
I also would just like to see a little more creativity
19:08
of coming up with something new that
19:10
I would like to believe is still in Hollywood. Yeah.
19:14
It's partly, well, it's very much a problem
19:16
of money, because if you're going to drop
19:18
$200, $300 million on
19:20
a movie or a TV show, you need to
19:22
be pretty sure that that money is going to
19:24
pay off. That the gamble is going to pay
19:26
off, and you're going to get your investment back,
19:28
because it's a lot to drop. And so that's
19:31
why they take on these supposedly safe bets. That's
19:33
why you see so many remakes of old shows
19:35
or old movies, trying to capitalize
19:37
on that existing fan base and take
19:40
the road that's well-traveled, you know, that
19:42
they think will be successful again. Doesn't
19:45
always work, because people are not too keen
19:47
on remakes generally, but they keep trying. And
19:49
I think, yeah, again, video games would be
19:51
a reflection of that, that trying to have
19:53
a safe bet. You
19:57
have that video up on your YouTube channel, Critical
19:59
Drink, you're talking about. I
26:00
can spend a lot of time talking about what's not good
26:02
and I don't want to watch what's not good. I'm not
26:04
going to watch Star Wars, act like. And
26:06
it's not a protest, it's about time
26:08
and investment. Why would I
26:10
give my time to it? So
26:12
what should I be that I might not be watching right
26:15
now, Will? Well, you're already watching
26:17
House of the Dragons, so that's definitely a
26:19
good start. The
26:21
Gentleman on, I think it's
26:23
Netflix, it's the Guy Ritchie show. It's based kind
26:25
of an offshoot of the movie that he did.
26:29
Again, a really good one. If you like
26:31
those sort of Guy Ritchie, lock stock in
26:33
Two Smoking Barrels or Snatch, that sort of
26:35
thing. It's great stuff. It's really funny, really
26:38
complex storytelling with lots of
26:41
betrayals and stuff and great
26:43
well-written characters. So that's a good one. And
26:46
probably Cobra Kai as well. That is a personal favorite
26:48
of mine. It's been going a few years now. I
26:50
think this is the last season this year. Tremendously
26:53
entertaining, brilliantly funny, a
26:57
great continuation of that Karate
27:00
Kid franchise from the
27:02
80s. Somehow they found a way to bring
27:04
it into the modern day but still keep
27:06
the beating heart of it going. And yeah,
27:08
I really enjoy that. I'm
27:11
on a good path. I've watched them both. Okay, last
27:13
two questions about the industry real quick. So
27:17
I've seen you talk about this on your channel. There's
27:20
no movie stars anymore. And this has been a while
27:22
in the making. I don't know
27:24
when we had our last movie star, when the last
27:26
one was built. Entertainment
27:28
is fractured. But what I find
27:30
fascinating about this, it's not just that
27:32
we don't have movie stars. It's almost
27:35
as though talent is interchangeable. You have a
27:37
very short shelf life as a movie star,
27:39
a quote unquote movie star, a leading man,
27:41
whatever it may be. But
27:44
I'm curious as to why. Because
27:47
when you see content fractured up,
27:50
this extends to what you do for a living now
27:52
and what I do as well. It
27:54
actually lends power back to the quote unquote
27:56
talent. I hate that word, but
27:59
it does because because the power shifts
28:01
away from the distributor. When there's just
28:03
a couple of distributors, they have all the power about who
28:05
will be stars and who will not be stars, right? But
28:08
now that the power's in the content
28:10
creator's hands, it makes them even more
28:12
valuable. I think you see that,
28:14
for example, by the way, in the news is
28:16
Stephen A. Smith's been offered $18
28:18
million by ESPN, and that's an opening
28:20
offer. So I'm just curious,
28:23
like, well then,
28:25
where's the money going if they don't
28:27
appreciate stars in content?
28:29
Is it showrunners? It's definitely
28:31
got to shift to the content creator. So
28:34
where are the stars? I
28:37
think the stars kind of vanished, particularly
28:39
with the advent of the
28:41
superhero movies that really just took over cinema
28:44
for such a long time, because people were
28:46
no longer going to the cinema to see
28:48
their favorite movie star, they were going to
28:50
see their favorite character. And
28:52
so that's a very big difference. And
28:54
when you have that, you essentially nullify the
28:56
need for a movie star. You just need
28:59
an actor who can play that character, and
29:01
that's what people are interested in seeing. And
29:04
we've kind of never gotten out
29:06
of that slump. And I don't know if
29:08
we will. And the other
29:10
part of the equation, I suppose, is
29:12
that things like social media have made
29:14
movie stars a lot more accessible, which
29:17
is not necessarily a good thing, because
29:20
they used to have a mystique. We'll find out who they are. Yeah,
29:23
exactly. We get to see who they really are. And
29:25
a lot of the time, they're not people that we
29:27
really want to know anymore about. That's
29:30
disappointing, but it robs them of them mystique, and
29:32
it robs them of their intrigue
29:34
and their star power, because they're just
29:36
humans like us. And we get
29:38
to hear every mundane thought that they have, and
29:41
it's often not very inspiring. So those two things
29:43
have kind of crippled the concept of the movie
29:45
star, sadly. All
29:47
right, finally, you've got another video up
29:50
about this, and we started our conversation here. They
29:53
keep blaming their problems on the audience. It's
29:56
almost as though it's intentional. Is
29:59
it intentional? this concept of fan baiting.
30:02
Is all the controversy and making the
30:04
audience mad part of marketing? Yeah,
30:07
apparently it is. I've seen various
30:10
reports about this, people trying to do
30:12
like expose on it and trying to
30:14
describe how the industry works. And I
30:16
think for certain studios, it's become standard
30:18
practice where they will intentionally make
30:21
a big song and dance about the fact
30:23
that they've changed the race and gender of
30:25
sexuality of certain characters in their new project.
30:28
They know that the fans would be unhappy
30:30
about that because it's disrespecting the source material.
30:33
They then parlay that into it
30:35
being motivated by racism or sexism,
30:37
bigotry, whatever. And they
30:40
could use that to garner sympathetic coverage from
30:42
the media and a big old storm of
30:44
controversy that gets lots of people talking about
30:46
their project. So it's essentially free marketing. It's
30:48
done in the dirtiest and most unpleasant way
30:50
possible. But it's effective. So
30:53
yeah, that's what they've been doing in a lot of cases. All
30:58
right, well, good luck. By the way, I'm taking
31:00
it as Scotland. You're rooting for
31:02
Scotland for a little while. Well, I did until they
31:04
got pooners over the weekend. Right. So
31:08
out of curiosity, do you shift any allegiance
31:10
at all to England at that point? Or
31:13
like what's the modern day relationship between Scotland and England?
31:15
Is it William Wallace still? Or are you going to
31:17
root for England? This is going to
31:19
get me hunted down in Scotland, like if I
31:21
say this. But yeah, a little bit to some
31:23
extent because there's still a British side. So OK,
31:25
they're close enough. Yeah, I know it's England. Yeah,
31:27
I know they can be real annoying about it
31:29
at times. But I guess I would rather they
31:31
won than someone like Italy
31:33
or France or whatever. So yeah,
31:35
I'll reluctantly shift my support to
31:37
England now. OK,
31:39
all right. All
31:42
right, man, critical drinker. Will Jordan,
31:44
thanks so much, man. We'll check you out on YouTube. Everybody should
31:46
check him out. If you ever have a piece of content that
31:48
you're curious about, should I watch this? Or why is it so
31:50
bad? He's going to be your man to tell you. Appreciate
31:53
it so much, Will. Thank you. Thanks,
31:56
Will. All
31:58
right, there he goes. Critical drinker here on the team. the Wilkain
32:00
Show. You heard me mention it. The
32:03
snobbiness of this Eurocentric view makes
32:05
me even more like I want
32:07
Donald Trump to bust in to
32:10
the country club. So here's the question. Do
32:13
you want a president you'd rather have a beer with or
32:15
a president who's the boss next
32:17
on the Wilkain Show? Visit
32:30
www. or
32:33
wherever you listen to your podcasts. And don't forget to spread the
32:35
sunshine. Would
32:47
you rather have a president with whom you'd like to
32:50
have a beer, or would you rather
32:53
have a president who is the boss? It is the Wilkain
32:55
Show streaming live at foxnews.com on
32:58
Instagram and on terrestrial radio as well as
33:01
at Youtube and Facebook at the Fox News pages.
33:03
But you can always catch the Wilkain Show on
33:05
demand by hitting Subscribe if you're listening in audio
33:07
format. Just head over to Apple or Spotify right
33:10
now and hit Subscribe if you're watching on
33:12
Youtube or Facebook. Just find us. It's in the description
33:15
of this live stream. You can hit Subscribe. Join
33:17
the Wilkain Show community. There's nothing to illustrate. A
33:19
guy you'd like to have a beer with more
33:22
than someone who uses the word whom.
33:25
Would you rather have a president with whom you'd
33:28
like to have a beer with or who's the
33:30
boss? Paul Scallis runs
33:34
a sub-stack and he's been
33:36
a guest here on the Wilkain Show and
33:38
his ex-handle is Lindy Man. He talks about
33:40
the concept of Lindy a lot. Lindy is
33:42
the idea that if
33:45
something has survived the test of
33:47
human trial and error, if
33:49
something is a tradition, if it's been around
33:51
for hundreds and certainly in the case thousands
33:55
of years, it has by
33:57
its very inherent survival value.
34:00
And that's absolutely true. That's part of the
34:02
conservative nature, by the way. You
34:04
don't just wake up with every
34:06
generation and these days, every couple years thinking,
34:08
oh, I can perfect humanity, ignoring,
34:11
what a small speck, not just in
34:13
the universe, but on the timeline you
34:15
actually are. Literally, something that's been around
34:17
for thousands of years has value. Now,
34:19
that is not to say, because it's
34:21
been around for thousands of years, we
34:24
just defer and continue,
34:26
I give you slavery. But,
34:29
it also, slavery is
34:31
an interesting thing to study. Martyr
34:34
Maid, Darrell Cooper has a long series,
34:37
podcast, 10 part series about
34:39
the history of slavery, because once again, in our
34:41
own hubris, like our
34:44
own lack of humility, we think slavery was
34:46
invented in America, or maybe
34:48
in the Caribbean. And we're the
34:50
first to ever have
34:52
slavery. Slavery has been around forever,
34:55
by the way, in various forms.
34:57
And here's something controversial, yet historically
34:59
true. Slavery was an advancement
35:01
in human civilization. The first form of slavery
35:03
was when you conquered another village, you conquered
35:06
another tribe, you took them
35:08
as slaves. But the truth is, prior to taking
35:10
them as slaves, do you know what you did
35:12
when you conquered another village, you conquered another tribe?
35:15
Murder, you killed everyone in the village.
35:17
When there was some economic value to
35:20
the vanquished, then they became slaves.
35:23
And this is on and on through
35:25
civilization, and tribe after tribe, and thousands
35:27
of years. But still,
35:30
the point there is to think of yourself as a little bit
35:32
more than the master of the universe
35:34
in your small little 20 year
35:37
vision of humanity. If it's been
35:39
around forever, then it
35:41
might consider, it might
35:43
deserve some consideration. Well, with
35:46
that backdrop, Lindyman, who constantly thinks about how is
35:48
this work in
35:51
the whole grand scheme of humanity,
35:53
asks, would you rather have a leader,
35:57
a president, that you want to have a beer with,
35:59
or? leader who's the boss. He
36:02
points back to a video about
36:04
a year ago of Ron DeSantis, Governor of
36:06
Florida, having a beer. You
36:09
know, a Coors Light. Awkwardly, if
36:11
we're being honest, Ron
36:14
DeSantis stands have found themselves among the most sensitive
36:16
in the political sphere. You can't point out the
36:18
obvious truths even when you like Ron DeSantis. And
36:20
I really like Ron DeSantis. But
36:23
it's awkward him attempting to have the beer with
36:25
a constituency. And he
36:27
writes, one of the things that makes Trump successful
36:31
is he is always in CEO
36:33
boss mode, even when
36:35
campaigning in public. The citizens act like
36:37
employees and they are grateful their boss
36:39
is being nice to him. Most
36:41
politicians try to be one of the regular
36:43
guys and it looks awkward. Trump
36:46
is just the boss and most people
36:48
have a boss and act accordingly.
36:51
Now let's state the obvious. You
36:54
don't work for the President of the United
36:56
States. The President of the United States works
36:59
for you, the American. These are public servants
37:01
and that's the proper view of public
37:03
service. Still, we
37:05
can understand as part of that public
37:07
service, you become the most powerful man
37:10
in the world, certainly when it comes to the
37:12
presidency. And that's gonna come with
37:14
it some aura
37:18
of the boss. That way for every leader
37:20
for thousands of years, from
37:22
emperors and generals to prime
37:24
ministers and presidents, they're
37:27
certainly, despite the fact that they work
37:29
for us, the aura of the
37:31
boss. So why do we try to like have
37:34
this pretense that they're the
37:36
everyman, you know? Well I think
37:38
the answer honestly is you want a bit of both
37:40
and you never want neither. I mean
37:43
look, Biden and Hillary Clinton are clearly neither.
37:45
That's not partisan. You don't want to have
37:47
a beer and you don't feel like they're the boss.
37:50
Certainly with Biden. Maybe you could tell yourself
37:52
that Hillary Clinton was some form of girl
37:54
boss. But
37:57
Donald Trump actually pulls off both. It's
37:59
true. He gives off boss
38:01
vibe. You walk into any room
38:04
and he is the boss. He
38:07
just did the All In podcast, which is huge,
38:09
Silicon Valley. I don't know about billionaires, but
38:13
maybe, but definitely hundred millionaires.
38:15
David Sachs, Chamath Palapatiya, Jason
38:17
Calcanis and Siskis
38:19
Hassel Podcast, the All In podcast. They all wore
38:21
suits. They never wear suits. They
38:24
all wore suits to match the
38:26
boss, to interview Donald Trump. But
38:29
I've been around him. It's interesting.
38:32
There is that aura, but he also wants you
38:34
to be happy. He's like the ultimate host. Like
38:37
he's, how's your food? How you doing? You
38:41
know, it's this,
38:44
and jokes and laughs and
38:47
is in on the joke. He even
38:49
laughs at himself in some ways. It's
38:52
a very much of a guy vibe, if you know what I
38:54
mean. And as
38:57
such, you know, kind of an
38:59
every man. Not awkward, not holding
39:01
himself out above, but yet stands
39:04
somewhat above. He's pulled off this
39:06
ability to be both. And if you haven't met
39:08
him, I would understand. And
39:11
this isn't like, oh, I've met Donald. No, I'm
39:13
just saying if you haven't met him, I'd understand if you only
39:15
see the boss version. But look at some
39:17
of the videos when he walks into a Dairy Queen. When
39:20
he walks into Tony and Nick's, you
39:22
know, cheesesteaks in Philadelphia. That's
39:25
not, you know, an emperor
39:28
asking you to kiss the cloak. That's
39:30
him polling people. Hey, what do we
39:32
think of vice presidency?
39:34
Who do you think? Oh, okay. You
39:37
like JD Vance? Oh,
39:39
you like Vivek? Okay. You know, he's, and
39:41
he's interested. He's not just doing it. He's
39:43
interested in hearing him. I
39:47
mean, it's like the difference
39:49
between talking at and talking with people. And
39:51
I think that
39:56
the true thing we're trying
39:58
to decide here what's
40:00
real what's authentic
40:04
don't pretend to be an everyman don't pretend to
40:06
drink Coors Lights with me if
40:08
you don't drink Coors Lights with
40:11
the people don't
40:13
pretend to be the boss if you've never
40:16
been the boss that's like Michael
40:19
Dukakis wearing a helmet on the back of
40:21
a tank didn't fit didn't feel authentic in
40:25
the end it's just got to be real and for Donald Trump
40:27
it's real to be like one
40:29
of the guys and the boss so who
40:32
do you want to be your president you
40:36
want the guy to be real and right now
40:38
for the moment in time I don't think
40:40
we really need someone to have a beer with
40:43
I we really need somebody competent to take charge
40:46
and to be the boss it's
40:49
okay to root for America it is
40:52
even when it's against my own personal team's
40:54
interests it's okay if you thought
40:56
Boston Celtics winning NBA
40:58
Finals was a win for America and
41:01
Michael Phelps ready to fight for America that's
41:03
next on the Will Cain Show a
41:17
win for America the Boston
41:19
Celtics over the Dallas Mavericks USA
41:22
it is the Will Cain Show streaming live at Fox
41:25
news.com on the Fox News YouTube channel the Fox News
41:27
Facebook page we'd love it if
41:29
you'd leave us a comment leave
41:31
us a review five stars if you think it's so deserved
41:34
but most importantly join the Will Cain Show
41:36
community subscribe on Apple or Spotify subscribe on
41:38
YouTube jump into the comment section and jump
41:40
in to the Will Cain Show
41:42
we need to send out a congratulations by
41:45
the way to our producer tinfoil Pat his
41:47
Florida Panthers are the NHL
41:50
champion tinfoil
41:52
really quickly want to ask you this exuberance
41:56
like like feel like
41:58
a champion today or relief feel like you
42:00
avoided being a loser. Because choking up a
42:03
3-0 lead would have
42:05
been historical. Like the worst, the worst thing
42:07
in the world. The Oilers came back after
42:09
Panthers were up 3-0 to tie it 3-3.
42:13
And that would have, you know like for
42:15
the Mavericks losing to the Celtics, for me, I
42:17
really didn't want to be somebody that was swept. To
42:20
be honest, I take a little bit of pride in that one game.
42:23
You don't want to go down the history books. And you
42:25
would have been page one in the worst form of
42:27
losing in the history books. So exuberance
42:29
or relief that you're the NHL or
42:31
the Stanley Cup champion? I
42:34
mean, during the game, you know, I could
42:36
just feel it slipping away, even with the
42:38
one goal lead. But
42:41
once it hits, you know, zeros, it's
42:43
exuberance all the way. I mean, the
42:47
Stanley Cup, winning the Stanley Cup and seeing it
42:49
lifted up, it's just
42:51
a different feeling. I don't know. You
42:53
can't, it gets past
42:55
that feeling of relief. Yeah, but it would have been bad. It
42:58
would have been bad. It would have been bad.
43:00
It would have been real bad. I
43:03
mean, you know, Bill Simmons used to
43:06
write a column, levels of losing. I
43:08
think it would have reached the apex,
43:10
like the worst level of losing. By
43:13
the way, as we're talking about championships here, we're
43:17
going to put a button on my Dallas Mavericks
43:19
losing to the Boston Celtics. But I was listening
43:21
to Dallas Sports Talk radio the other day, and
43:23
they were real mad about former NBA player Nick
43:25
Young saying that the
43:27
Celtics being the Mavs was a win
43:29
for America. Here, I want you
43:31
to listen to what Nick Young had to say
43:34
about the Celtics versus the Mavs and
43:36
Jason Tatum and Jalen Brown versus Luca
43:38
Doncic. Here's former NBA player, Nick Young.
43:43
Cause we won, baby. America won,
43:45
baby. Jason Tatum, Jalen Brown did
43:48
it for America. They
43:50
put Luca out. Oh
43:53
my God. I
43:55
got so tired of everybody talking
43:57
about these foreigners and America. America's
44:00
here, baby. It's America's league, baby. It's
44:02
America's league. I hope y'all see it.
44:04
Save them here, motherfucker. Bam. That's Nick
44:06
Young. And you know how
44:08
I like regionalism, you know? I probably like
44:11
cities over states and states over countries and
44:13
countries over globalists. But
44:23
the guys in Dallas were super mad about this because, you
44:25
know, we ride with Luca. But
44:27
I actually get it. Like if you're not a
44:29
Mavericks fan, you know, I think
44:32
it's perfectly fine to celebrate the Celtics
44:34
over the Mavs, to root for Boston
44:36
over Dallas in this case because their
44:38
best players in Boston are Americans. Now
44:40
– and Dallas' best player is from
44:43
Slovenia. Now let me say, there has
44:45
been this racial tension going on. We talked about it
44:47
here with Andy Murray on the Friday
44:49
edition of Canon Sports. There is definitely a racial
44:51
component that – where,
44:53
you know, the NBA is supposed to be
44:56
black and the best players can't be, you
44:58
know, Nikola Jokic and Luca Doncic. And that
45:00
was Gilbert Arenas' show, by the way. And
45:02
Gilbert Arenas, I think, has said something like
45:04
that. So that's
45:06
different. I'm not into the racial identity
45:09
politics, tribalism of basketball. But
45:12
national tribalism and politics? Yeah, absolutely.
45:15
We invented basketball. Come on,
45:17
peach baskets. It's okay. Two
45:20
a days, tin foil. I'm okay with this. Like,
45:23
you know, Young Establishment James is a
45:25
Celtics fan, but just take random dude
45:27
from Jacksonville, by the way.
45:29
I heard Jacksonville described as America's pawn shop.
45:31
Like, if pawn shops were a city, it
45:34
would be Jacksonville. Wow.
45:37
It's true. Which tin foil –
45:39
tin foil lives in Jacksonville. But
45:42
random dude from Jacksonville. I
45:44
think you can look at the Celtics over the Mavs and say,
45:47
win for America. Do you guys disagree? I'm
45:50
a little biased. I don't like Boston sports, being
45:52
a New York sports fan. But like
45:55
I said, I was rooting for the Mavs. I
45:57
like the Mavs. So I don't
45:59
know. It's a tough call, but you know,
46:02
it's a win for America, I would say. Yeah.
46:05
Mavs best player from Slovenia, Celtics
46:07
best players from America. I don't
46:09
mind somebody celebrating that tin foil.
46:12
It gets a, it gets a little confusing. Um,
46:15
because like yesterday to bring the
46:17
Panthers back into this, they
46:19
beat the Canadian team, kept
46:22
the 31 year streak going where we
46:24
have the cup in America. But
46:27
our captain is finished. So, I mean,
46:30
you know, where do you draw? I don't know where you draw the line. Well,
46:34
hockey's going to be tough. Yeah. Players and,
46:36
and, uh, you know, but, but I do
46:38
think, yeah, I mean, as long
46:41
as the Raptors don't win it, I, you know,
46:43
I think that it's a win for America overall
46:45
in general, and then you go down to
46:47
players. Yeah.
46:50
Well, look, good luck getting an all American hockey
46:52
team. If Rachel can't post stuff, he made the
46:54
argument to me that hockey was the most patriotic
46:56
sport this past weekend. I mean,
46:59
patriotic for who? For Canada, for Finland. Like, what
47:01
are we talking about here? How many Americans, what
47:03
is it? 30% is 30% of the ice American
47:05
at this point. Like
47:08
if I take a random selection of
47:11
hockey players skating on the ice at
47:13
any given moment, what percentage is
47:15
American? I'm going to put the over under 35%. What
47:18
I'm, what I'm looking at right now, I take the under what I'm looking
47:21
at right now is 29.3% of the league is American. Pretty
47:25
good. The US born. I
47:30
am so okay with nationalism. Like what
47:32
is wrong with it? I'm okay. And
47:34
this is part of what I like
47:36
about sports. Like again, back to the
47:39
Euro 2024 and the Copa America. I
47:41
mean, it's awesome. We get to root
47:43
for the red, white, and blue. And
47:45
I know there's going to be anti-soccer
47:47
guy out there and anti-soccer guys, even
47:49
on this show, multiple anti-soccer guys on
47:51
this show, but what an awesome opportunity to root for
47:53
the red, white, and blue. And
47:56
also by the way, anti-soccer guy is also
47:58
anti-Olympic guy. Huge crawler. crossover and
48:00
I like both. I like Olympics
48:02
and soccer.
48:05
And we got the Olympics in a few months. This
48:07
is partly because I played an Olympic sport growing up,
48:10
you know, for swimming and water polo. And
48:13
this caught my attention. Michael Phelps
48:15
just being so pro-America. He was
48:18
shown a video, of course, you
48:20
know, America's greatest all-time swimmer. I
48:22
mean, up there, by the way, in any Mount Rushmore
48:24
of great athletes. It's just fact, the way he dominated.
48:29
Was shown a video by this Australians when we're
48:31
talking this way about America. I want you to
48:33
listen to Phelps's reaction. So
48:35
much sweeter beating America. Yeah. Particularly
48:38
the first night of competition where
48:40
we did not have to hear
48:43
star spangled banner ring out through
48:45
the stadium. And I cannot tell
48:47
you how happy that made me.
48:49
So for the Americans, if
48:52
you see what I just saw, that's the first time I saw
48:54
it. I would watch that thing every single
48:56
day to give me that
48:58
little extra bit of just, I mean, I'm
49:03
yeah, that, that's
49:06
awesome. Well, the good news
49:08
is the Olympics will be here
49:10
shortly and we'll be able to see what the results
49:12
are. Well,
49:15
what's fun about that video and we edited it just
49:18
a little bit for time, but my favorite part and
49:20
it wouldn't play in audio is when
49:22
he's watching the video, it's his
49:24
facial expressions. It's authentic, like random
49:26
eyebrow raises, random like force upside
49:29
down smiles. You know, the ones
49:31
that aren't real smiles, more
49:34
like smiles right before you stab someone in
49:37
medieval Europe. He's legit not happy. And she
49:39
would just going on on like, I hate
49:41
USA USA chance. I never want to hear
49:44
the star spangled banner. They're cowbells and that's
49:46
awesome. She's Australian. So be pro Australian. That's
49:48
great. And that's a bit of a swimming
49:50
rivalry because it's the two best in the
49:53
world. Used to
49:55
be US and Russia. Now
49:57
it's US and Australia and has been for. 20
50:00
plus years, but um He's
50:03
legit like he's mad and
50:05
I love it and I love
50:07
to see that Ride
50:11
or die for the red white and blue USA
50:14
makes me want to watch the Olympics
50:16
even more and I don't begrudge that
50:18
Australian whatever her name is as she
50:22
Ticks off the greatest swimmer of all time
50:24
who will not be in the water, but
50:26
might just motivate other Americans. It's okay To
50:30
root for America. All right That's gonna do
50:32
it for us today here on the Wil
50:34
Kane show always love hanging out with you
50:36
Hope to see you again tomorrow in order
50:38
to ensure that we do so subscribe Apple
50:40
Spotify YouTube. I'll see you again next time Listen
50:57
ad free with a Fox News podcast
50:59
plus subscription on Apple podcast and Amazon
51:03
Prime members you can listen to this
51:05
show ad free on the Amazon music
51:07
app From the
51:09
Fox News Podcasts Network. Subscribe and
51:11
listen to the Trey Gowdy Podcast.
51:14
Former federal prosecutor and four-term US
51:16
congressman from South Carolina brings you
51:18
a one-of-a-kind podcast. Subscribe and listen
51:20
now by going to foxnewspodcasts.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More