Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Released Wednesday, 23rd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Inside Iran special - how close is a nuclear deal?

Wednesday, 23rd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

I'm for stopping Iran very simply

0:06

from having a nuclear weapon. They

0:08

can't have a nuclear weapon. I

0:10

want Iran to be great

0:12

and prosperous and terrific. When

0:18

I went to the Iranian parliament the

0:20

other day, people said, I've never

0:22

remember a time when an American journalist

0:25

was there inside the Iranian parliament

0:27

watching the sessions, talking to member of

0:29

the National Security Committee. It made

0:31

the blogs. Hello

0:36

and welcome to the world. I'm

0:38

Yalda and I'm currently in

0:41

London and I'm Richard Engel and I

0:43

am in Tehran at the moment the

0:45

capital of Iran and it is wonderful

0:47

to be here interesting times and Great

0:49

to see you Yalda. We're gonna have

0:51

a lot to talk about today. This

0:53

is a pretty rare trip for me

0:55

I've been to Iran a few times,

0:57

but I haven't been here for years And

1:00

Allah has changed since I was last

1:02

in this country. A lot is

1:04

going on. Diplomacy, nuclear

1:06

talks, cultural changes seem

1:08

to be afoot here. It's

1:11

an exciting time and I can't wait to

1:13

unpack it. Yeah, absolutely. I can't

1:15

wait to hear about it. Richard,

1:17

of course, we were both off last

1:19

week and you were traveling. So

1:22

really great to see you again and

1:24

to be back on the podcast. So let's

1:26

get started. And for those of you

1:28

who aren't already subscribed, thank you for

1:30

those who did it. Please do. It

1:33

helps us. It helps us bring

1:35

this show to you. So

1:37

please do that. And if you

1:39

can and you want to and feel

1:41

inspired, write in with thoughts, comments,

1:43

questions. We love receiving them at the

1:45

usual place, theworldatsky

1:48

.uk. So

1:57

I am in Iran and

2:00

itself is an extraordinary statement

2:02

because this is generally not

2:04

a country that lets in

2:06

many journalists, certainly doesn't let

2:08

in many American reporters. And

2:11

I'm here for about two weeks,

2:13

which is a pretty long trip

2:15

for Iran. When I came in

2:17

the past, I got a five

2:19

day visa. Every step we took,

2:21

we were accompanied by minders. This

2:24

time I have a longer visa,

2:26

and when I'm out on the

2:28

streets and been walking around, maybe

2:31

we're being followed in the background, maybe

2:33

we're being monitored, but we're not

2:35

required to leave the hotel with binders.

2:37

We are able to walk around,

2:39

talk to people, go shopping,

2:41

do interviews, do interviews on

2:43

the streets, and

2:45

people are giving us a very

2:48

warm welcome. I was in the

2:50

Grand Bazaar just yesterday. The central

2:52

market, the covered market, sort of

2:54

looks like the one in Istanbul,

2:56

miles of corridors, and they sell

2:58

spices and carpets. It's a beautiful,

3:00

fascinating place. And as

3:02

I was walking around, first people

3:04

thought that maybe we were a group of

3:06

tourists, and I could hear them saying, oh, Americans

3:08

are tourists. And they were very excited. And

3:10

I was getting thumbs up. And then when we

3:12

took out the camera, it was pretty clear

3:15

that we were journalists and we were interviewing people.

3:17

And they were more excited. And

3:19

they were more happy because

3:21

they thought it's a sign. It's a

3:23

sign that this country is opening

3:25

up. These nuclear talks

3:28

that are going on

3:30

between the United States and

3:32

Iran have created a

3:34

lot of excitement. They've created

3:36

a lot of excitement because people hope

3:38

that it means that there won't

3:40

be an attack on Iran, even though

3:42

President Trump says it's still on

3:44

the table and the Israelis have talked

3:46

about carrying out attacks on the

3:48

nuclear sites numerous times. So they

3:50

think, OK, if there's talks, there

3:53

won't be some sort of military strikes.

3:55

And they're really hopeful that it

3:57

will lift sanctions and that a

3:59

deal will allow Iranians to get

4:01

out of this box that they

4:03

are living in. Because when

4:05

you're here and live here, You

4:07

can't really do business with

4:09

the world. You're cut off. You

4:12

can't use credit cards. You can't

4:14

send money abroad. It's

4:16

very difficult to travel.

4:18

If you have a bank account

4:20

and you have it in

4:22

Iranian currency, you're at the whims

4:24

of inflation. So

4:27

people here feel

4:29

maybe they can break out of

4:31

this box, re -engage with the world

4:33

politically, socially, economically, and

4:36

that could... people's

4:38

daily lives. A country

4:40

of 90 million that wants

4:42

to trade, travel, engage

4:44

is now feeling a sense

4:47

of excitement that it

4:49

might be coming and that

4:51

is making it a

4:53

very exciting time to be

4:55

here. Yeah, absolutely,

4:57

Richard. for

5:00

decades. The Iranian people have survived

5:02

under these sanctions at different points when

5:04

they've gone head to head with

5:06

the West, when the regime has gone

5:08

head to head with the West.

5:11

And often the regime has tried to

5:13

point the finger of blame on

5:15

the United States, on the West for

5:18

the state of the nation. And they've

5:20

said it's because of the sanctions

5:22

that you are living the way that

5:24

you are. But we have seen

5:26

now, certainly in the last few

5:28

years, that the Iranian people

5:30

are saying to the regime, enough. We've

5:32

had enough of you. We want

5:34

change. We want you gone. And we've

5:37

seen that in different movements. We

5:39

saw that in the Green Revolution in

5:41

2009. We saw, just in the

5:43

last couple of years, with the women's

5:45

movement, where there was an uprising

5:47

led by the so -called TikTok generation,

5:49

where these young teenage girls stood up

5:52

and said to the regime, we

5:54

are not going to be forced to

5:56

wear this headscarf off the back of

5:58

the death of a young Masa

6:00

Amini. We

6:02

can see the different

6:04

crossroads that this nation

6:07

continues to be in, but

6:09

I'm so fascinated, Richard,

6:11

because we both covered the story of

6:13

the women's movement over the course of

6:15

the last couple of years. Just tell

6:18

me, being in Iran, as you say,

6:20

really difficult to get into the country,

6:22

I certainly haven't. sort of attempted to

6:24

go. I worked at the

6:26

BBC for years and it was really difficult

6:28

for a BBC journalist to enter the

6:30

country. But this is now a

6:32

moment where suddenly the regime is

6:34

opening up and we know in the

6:36

past that journalists have been arrested.

6:39

An Italian journalist a few months ago

6:41

was arrested and the Italians had

6:43

to release an Iranian to get

6:45

the journalist out. First of

6:47

all just as you say you feel

6:49

more welcome there at ten days is a

6:51

long time to be there But just

6:53

what are you seeing when you capturing in

6:55

terms of the mood more than ten days? We've

6:57

asked for an extension. I think it's going to be

6:59

granted And that's

7:01

not the kind of reception that

7:03

I've had here in the

7:05

past. It's not that I'm

7:07

naive, you know, just because we're being welcomed

7:09

and we're giving more access and gotten

7:11

a visa and I'm getting some thumbs up

7:13

from people on the streets. It doesn't

7:15

mean, oh, everything is great, you know, everything

7:17

is perfect in Iran. That would be,

7:19

you know... would be foolish. I've been doing

7:21

this business too long to be fooled

7:23

by that. But let's talk about the women.

7:25

And then we'll talk about the nuclear

7:27

issue because it's fascinating and people might not

7:29

understand it. But let's talk about the women's issue

7:32

in particular. This is one

7:34

of the most sensitive issues and

7:36

one of the issues that's really

7:38

at the cultural and political heart

7:40

of the regime is women. and

7:43

women's dress and women's rights

7:45

and how women present themselves

7:47

in public. You are

7:49

officially required as a woman

7:51

here to wear a veil in

7:53

public. And in every restaurant

7:55

you go into, there's a sign

7:57

on the wall, and there's

7:59

a picture of a woman wearing a

8:01

veil. And it says, please, in

8:04

these premises, according to the law,

8:06

wear Islamic dress. There

8:08

are usually multiple signs in every shop,

8:10

every cafe, in the hotel where I'm

8:12

staying, in the lobby, everywhere these signs

8:14

up. And people aren't listening to them anymore.

8:17

And people aren't listening to them brazenly.

8:20

You walk down the street and

8:22

I would say just by

8:25

observation, maybe

8:27

30%, 40 %

8:29

of women are not

8:31

wearing head scarves anymore. They

8:34

will have a little scarf.

8:36

around their necks in case there's

8:38

an issue in case maybe

8:40

like a police officer comes up

8:42

to them they can quickly

8:44

just put it over their over

8:46

their hair but they're

8:48

just keeping it around their necks and

8:50

they're walking by the police

8:52

stations they're walking by

8:55

government ministries i've seen people

8:57

walking with the women

8:59

with their hair out

9:01

walking right past groups

9:03

of of of

9:05

what you would consider the morality

9:07

police, and they don't say

9:09

anything. They have stopped

9:11

enforcing it on a

9:13

daily basis, and that

9:15

is a significant change.

9:18

I don't think they've given up. I'm not

9:20

sure that this is the end of the

9:22

road, but... was a movement here. It

9:25

lasted a couple of

9:27

years. It turned quite violent.

9:29

There was a death

9:31

of at least one. Several

9:33

protesters had violent encounters. It

9:35

was a brutal crackdown. But it

9:38

seems to have made a difference

9:40

because the government, at least

9:42

right now, has decided

9:44

it doesn't want that fight and

9:46

it is not picking that fight. And

9:49

people here are hoping that

9:51

that is the start of significant

9:53

changes now. It could be

9:55

temporary It could be that the

9:57

government has other priorities right

9:59

now and therefore is put this

10:01

one on the back burner But

10:03

it is happening and it is

10:05

obvious and people are talking

10:07

about it. I did a television

10:09

interview American television with

10:11

a woman just a couple of

10:13

days ago long hair Down to her

10:15

down to below her shoulders And

10:18

she did the interview

10:20

on camera without

10:22

a headscarf on. Now,

10:25

that would have been unthinkable. Even in North

10:27

Tehran a few years ago, you know, people

10:29

may not have been wearing them or they

10:31

were barely wearing them. But if we interviewed

10:33

them on camera, they would quickly, you know,

10:35

wrap themselves up so they wouldn't get in

10:37

trouble, even if they found it personally annoying. Now,

10:41

she said, ah, let's do it and didn't

10:43

care. And that's a

10:45

sense of confidence that I've never

10:47

seen in this country. Yeah,

10:49

I mean, that is incredibly brave.

10:51

We can't overstate how brave

10:53

it is because it was a

10:55

death sentence before for these

10:57

women. It was unthinkable for them

10:59

not to... their headscarves on.

11:01

It was very much linked to

11:03

the Islamic Revolution of 1979.

11:05

And this has been something that's

11:08

been enforced for decades. So

11:10

for these women to say now,

11:12

I don't want to wear

11:14

this. And why this is linked,

11:16

Richard, to the current state

11:18

of play needs to be explained

11:20

as well. Because of course,

11:22

we are now seeing this

11:24

regime in talks again with

11:26

the Trump administration and let's

11:28

just remind our audiences where

11:30

we're at because when we

11:32

talk about the original Iran

11:34

nuclear deal, the one that

11:36

the Obama administration put together.

11:39

Now, that was about a

11:41

decade in the making. And

11:43

it was, you know, the Europeans were on board, the

11:46

Americans were driving it. And

11:48

it was basically to curb

11:50

Iran's nuclear program to ensure that

11:52

Iran wasn't going to weaponize

11:54

its nuclear program and be a

11:56

threat to the region and

11:58

the global community. Now,

12:01

what happened? to

12:03

that deal, which was the

12:05

JCPOA, the Joint Comprehensive

12:08

Plan of Action. You

12:10

remember during Donald Trump's

12:12

first administration, he came in

12:14

and he ripped up

12:16

the JCPOA, the Iran nuclear

12:18

deal. And he said, you

12:20

know, that he felt that the Obama

12:22

administration had made so many concessions that

12:25

he would have walked away from it.

12:27

He described it as the worst deal

12:29

ever. And he applied at that point,

12:31

maximum pressure on Iran.

12:34

And so another deal. to

12:36

ease sanctions to bring Iran to

12:38

the nuclear table was never really

12:40

enforced, not under the Biden administration.

12:42

It was toyed with, it was

12:44

flirted with, but it never, never

12:46

came about. Trump has

12:49

decided that he's going to send

12:51

a clear message to the

12:53

Iranian regime. You either come

12:55

to the negotiating table, you make

12:57

concessions, or we're going to smash

12:59

you. essentially. That is the message

13:01

that he sent. He sent a

13:03

letter to Ayatollah Khamenei a few

13:05

weeks ago and basically said, look,

13:07

we want to talk, you've got

13:09

to come to the table. There

13:12

are many people who are

13:14

now saying basically that it is

13:16

going to be a revival

13:18

of the JCPOA. The Iranians

13:20

want it. The Americans want

13:22

it. The Trump administration needs

13:24

this deal. They need a

13:26

win of some sort. Trump

13:29

made all sorts of claims

13:31

during the campaign. And as

13:33

we sort of head towards

13:35

100 days of his second

13:37

term, three months in,

13:39

what he has said from the

13:41

beginning is, I'm going to make a

13:43

deal on ending the war in

13:45

Gaza. The ceasefire broke

13:47

down. I'm going to bring an

13:49

end to the war in Ukraine within

13:52

24 hours. I mean within It's

13:54

been almost a hundred days. He hasn't

13:56

been able to bring the two

13:58

sides to the negotiating table So the

14:00

one liked in all of this

14:02

for Trump is Iran now because

14:04

they have had several rounds of

14:06

talks in in Rome in Oman

14:08

They're looking at another round of

14:10

talks soon And why this matters,

14:12

what you're saying about the women in

14:14

the situation in Iran to circle it all

14:16

back, is the Iranian regime needs

14:19

this too. We've seen over the course

14:21

of the last year, the

14:23

proxies that they have built up

14:25

in the region, Hezbollah, Hamas,

14:27

the Houthis, the groups that they

14:29

have backed, this so -called axis

14:31

of resistance or axis of

14:33

evil or upheaval, has more

14:35

or less been dismantled by

14:38

the Israelis. They

14:40

are facing backlash

14:42

at home through what you're

14:44

talking about now, not just

14:46

because of the sanctions and

14:48

people are living in dire

14:50

conditions, but also because people

14:52

are saying, we don't want you anymore. And

14:55

thirdly, they want to be able

14:57

to make some kind of deal now

14:59

with the Americans. And that's,

15:01

first of all, exactly brilliant

15:03

summary of where we are

15:05

right now in the JCPOA

15:08

that broke down. So

15:10

I mentioned why the Iranian people want

15:12

a deal, right? They don't want to

15:14

be attacked. They don't want to fight

15:16

with the United States. They don't want

15:18

to see Tehran bombed. Tehran, by the

15:20

way, is a huge city. You know,

15:22

it's a city on the size of

15:24

Istanbul, with you include the outer suburbs.

15:27

This is a city of roughly

15:29

20 million people. Iran has about

15:31

85, 90 million people, total

15:33

population, and a large percentage

15:36

of them live in Tehran.

15:39

Tehran... don't want to see bomb.

15:41

They don't want to see war. They watch

15:43

what happened in Gaza. They don't want any

15:45

part of it. They don't want it. They

15:47

want to do business with the world, and

15:49

they want sanctions to be lifted, and they

15:51

hope this deal will allow that. Now,

15:54

people are talking about the

15:56

nuclear deal, the enrichment

15:59

deal, and you don't need to be

16:01

a nuclear scientist to understand the deal. It's

16:03

pretty simple. Shall we talk about it for

16:05

a second? Go ahead. There

16:08

is a nuclear program here. It's based on

16:10

uranium. And uranium, of

16:12

course, is an element. It's

16:14

a radioactive element. And

16:16

you can dig it out of the ground. But

16:18

when you dig it out of the ground, it

16:20

doesn't do very much. It just sort of emits

16:22

radiation. In order to make it useful, you

16:24

have to enrich it. And the way

16:26

you enrich uranium, one of

16:28

the ways is you spin

16:31

it. you put it a centrifuge

16:33

and you spin it and

16:35

spin it and spin it and

16:37

spin it until it gets

16:39

more and more concentrated because the

16:41

heavier bits are thrown out

16:43

toward the end of a centrifuge

16:46

and you enrich it. And

16:48

that's what it's really all about

16:50

because in order to have

16:52

a weapons grade, to have weapons

16:54

grade uranium, it needs to

16:56

be about 90 % pure. So

16:58

highly enriched, really dangerous uranium that

17:01

you could use to make

17:03

a nuclear weapon. And

17:05

the IAEA believes that

17:07

they have enough 60 %

17:09

enriched uranium that they

17:12

could take that 60%,

17:14

quickly move it up

17:16

to 90 % and

17:18

then make a bomb. What

17:21

the deal would be... don't

17:23

exactly know the deals are

17:25

happening behind closed doors, but

17:28

the general framework would be

17:30

that Iran would agree not

17:32

to enrich very to high

17:34

levels, not to enrich to

17:36

anything close to a weapons

17:39

grade uranium. They would keep

17:41

it at low levels, which

17:43

you can still use to

17:45

make power. They would

17:47

take the the more highly enriched stuff

17:49

that they already have, send it out

17:51

of the country, they would

17:54

be allowed to make the

17:56

low level enriched uranium for

17:58

civilian purposes, and that they

18:00

would be monitored and have

18:02

frequent monitors to make sure

18:04

that they don't go above

18:06

a certain threshold. And that

18:08

in exchange for doing that, getting

18:10

rid of the highly enriched

18:12

uranium, allowing in monitors that

18:14

it would get sanctions relief.

18:16

the threat of a military action

18:18

would go away and there

18:20

would be peace, prosperity and a

18:22

new page for Iran. It's

18:25

possible. It's not and it's not that

18:27

different. That was the basic framework of

18:29

the Obama deal. And

18:31

many Iranians believe that Trump tore up

18:33

that deal and he's going to and

18:35

he's going to fight to put a

18:37

very similar deal back in place, but

18:39

that he tore it up because he

18:41

didn't like Obama. He tore it up

18:43

because Obama did it and he wants

18:46

the deal. that he does. And

18:48

so even if it's very similar, it

18:50

will be his deal with his man,

18:52

and he would get the... credit for it?

18:54

Not just the credit, but the Nobel

18:56

Peace Prize that he is after. I mean,

18:58

if he gets one of these deals,

19:01

whether it's Ukraine, whether it's Iran, whether

19:03

he changes the JCPOA

19:05

even slightly, he we

19:07

know is after this Nobel

19:09

Peace Prize. And so if

19:11

he is able to strike

19:14

something out of this with

19:16

the Iranians, whether or not

19:18

it's a two -pager, the

19:20

original JCPOA was this comprehensive

19:22

document that had the biggest

19:24

brains in terms of understanding

19:26

nuclear programs on the planet,

19:29

working on it from Europe

19:31

and the United States. But

19:33

this could be quite a

19:35

sort a two -pager that he

19:37

brings out slightly tweaks, makes a

19:39

few changes. Now, the biggest

19:41

problem here, Richard, I think, is...

19:44

If the United States asks for too

19:46

much or if the United States

19:48

asks for too little and you know

19:50

The Israelis that I've been speaking

19:52

to have said the concern is

19:54

they will ask for too little They

19:56

will make so many concessions and

19:59

give the Iranians so much in return

20:01

the Iranians will think well We

20:03

need to come to the negotiating

20:05

table for all of the reasons that

20:07

we've just stated whether it's sanctions

20:09

relief whether it's because they're proxies and

20:11

the groups that they've been supporting

20:14

for decades have been smashed in

20:16

the region or whether it's domestic problems

20:18

that they're currently facing and this

20:20

rising, this uprising of voices that are

20:22

turning against the regime, they need

20:24

this as much as the Trump

20:26

administration does. So we'll have to see

20:29

how it plays out and whether

20:31

the Americans do make the sort of

20:33

concessions that the Israelis certainly are

20:35

concerned that they will. So the

20:37

other question is... Well, what about the

20:39

regime? Why does the regime care?

20:41

The regime wants this deal. The regime

20:44

says it wants this deal. The

20:47

supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei

20:49

says that he's endorsed the

20:51

deal. And I was

20:53

at Friday prayers. I was

20:55

one of the first Westerners

20:57

inside the main mosque at

20:59

Tehran University on Army Day

21:01

when it was full of

21:03

soldiers and people who would

21:05

be considered real hardliners and

21:07

I was listening to the

21:10

sermon and the preacher was

21:12

saying, we don't

21:14

trust the Americans, don't think

21:16

they're our friends, but we're still

21:18

gonna talk because, and

21:20

then he cited Quranic verses and Islamic

21:22

traditions, it was a sermon after

21:24

all, to say why negotiations are important

21:26

and why it's important to have

21:28

dialogue even with people you don't agree

21:31

with. So the question is, why?

21:33

Why? Why are they doing this? One,

21:35

I think they're feeling a lot

21:37

of economic pressure because the economy here

21:39

is in difficult state. It's

21:42

difficult for the people to trade and

21:44

to, you know, they can't use credit cards

21:46

and sell things. And, you know, this

21:48

country produces a lot of beautiful things, not

21:50

just carpets and pistachios and saffron, although

21:52

all those are fabulous. But they

21:54

also have industry and they want to engage

21:56

and they want to sell and they want

21:58

to They want the world to know their

22:00

market and they want it to sell things. The

22:03

government needs that income because right now

22:05

they're basically just selling their oil to

22:07

China and they're using the fleets of

22:09

old tankers and it's a very, there's

22:11

a lot of smuggling and it's complicated

22:13

and it's expensive for them because anytime

22:16

you have to operate in sort of

22:18

the gray economy, you lose a lot

22:20

of money. So they need the money,

22:23

that's definite. They

22:25

are in a weakened position

22:27

for the exact reasons you mentioned.

22:30

Look what's just happened in the last couple of

22:32

years. Iran, its

22:34

strength, its power was

22:36

always through its ability to

22:39

maintain control at home,

22:41

which through its security services,

22:43

through surveillance, through

22:45

the laws and through

22:47

the different security apparatuses

22:49

here. their

22:52

ability to protect themselves by

22:54

a network of proxies,

22:56

a network of armor. I

22:58

like to think of

23:00

it as Iran's outer coat

23:02

of armor. And

23:04

that outer coat of armor, let's

23:06

call it weapons, if

23:08

you will, was

23:10

strategically placed. around Israel in

23:13

order to send a message

23:15

to Israel don't think about

23:17

bombing us because we can

23:19

hurt you and They they

23:21

had very close relations with

23:24

Hamas in Gaza right on

23:26

the border, of course with

23:28

Israel They had very very

23:30

close relations with Hezbollah, which

23:32

is right to the north

23:34

of Israel They had a

23:37

very very close relations with

23:39

Bashar al -Assad of Syria all

23:41

three of those are either

23:43

decimated, weakened, or

23:45

in Bashar al -Assad's case, gone. So

23:48

their armor has been

23:50

removed. So are

23:52

they coming to the table now

23:55

because they have no choice,

23:57

because they need the money and

23:59

because they're not in the

24:01

same military position that they were?

24:04

Or is this real? Is this

24:06

a real change? Is this the

24:08

start of a process That

24:10

is going to be transformative

24:12

and I think Iranians don't really

24:15

know they're hopeful that it's

24:17

it's it's it's the latter But

24:19

they're also willing to take

24:21

the risk That that it's the

24:23

former that even if Iran

24:25

is doing this because it's under

24:27

pressure Iranians will say well

24:29

who cares as long as they're

24:31

taking these steps for whatever

24:33

reason maybe it leads to a

24:35

more positive outcome for them

24:37

politically socially economically But the

24:39

change, at least for now,

24:41

is happening. It's real. Now,

24:44

I don't know if this window is going to close. It's

24:47

possible that in a couple of months,

24:50

Trump decides, you

24:53

know, I've tried my best. I

24:55

wanted these negotiations to work, but they

24:57

were a failure and the military

24:59

strikes happened. That's still very possible. You

25:01

know, again, neither of us were

25:03

born yesterday. And there are

25:06

splits within the administration. Those

25:08

hardliners, Iran hawks, you know, the

25:10

Mike Walters of the world

25:12

who say, listen, you know, we

25:14

know how this regime operates

25:16

and they are just trying to

25:18

buy time here. They want

25:20

a nuclear bomb. They want to

25:22

acquire a nuclear weapon. And

25:24

therefore, they are just saying what

25:26

needs to be said because

25:28

it's a short -term sort of

25:30

gain for Trump. And maybe. And

25:32

maybe. But either way, it's

25:34

happening. We are in this window

25:36

now. a

25:38

window opens more and

25:40

more air comes

25:42

in, or the window

25:44

is smashed, closed, and

25:47

breaks into shards of glass, we

25:49

will see. And I think we

25:51

will see in the next few months.

25:53

But at the moment right now,

25:55

diplomacy does seem to be moving quickly

25:57

and does seem to be making

25:59

some Richard, I

26:01

do want to sort of ask

26:04

a little bit more on

26:06

that because there are those within

26:08

Israel, for example, that are

26:10

incredibly concerned that actually, you

26:12

know, I mean, I spoke

26:14

to some contacts yesterday who said, if

26:16

we go back to the JCPOA,

26:18

that particular deal, it's the... best of

26:21

the sort of the worst deals

26:23

that could possibly, the worst outcomes that

26:25

could possibly come out of this. So

26:27

it's not so bad if we go

26:30

back to that Obama nuclear deal. There

26:32

are others who believe, as we

26:34

were just saying, that actually Iran

26:36

is just, you know, they're playing

26:38

games and they, just like they

26:41

are allowing women to wear headscarves,

26:43

but actually the long term plan

26:45

is to get everyone back into

26:47

line. that they have

26:49

the same attitude towards their nuclear

26:51

ambitions, that they do want

26:53

to weaponize their nuclear program. And

26:55

it could all be a

26:57

trick. It could be that once

26:59

they get more surveillance technology

27:01

in place and they do have

27:03

good relations with China, they

27:06

could easily, if they could afford it, buy

27:08

AI -enabled cameras that could

27:11

detect women wearing headscarfs and

27:13

launch a major crackdown, all

27:15

of these things are possible.

27:17

And it is It is

27:19

possible that we suddenly have

27:22

a reverse in this trend,

27:24

certainly possible. But the

27:26

government here is one of

27:28

the most open -minded and flexible

27:30

the president that they've had

27:33

in many years. And

27:35

the hardliners recognized, there were

27:37

elections. You remember, Raisi, the former

27:39

president, died in that helicopter

27:41

crash. This mysterious helicopter crash, right?

27:43

And he was a hardliner.

27:45

He was someone who people thought

27:47

could be the next supreme

27:49

leader. The supreme leader is the

27:51

Ayatollah who runs the theocracy.

27:53

The president is the one who

27:55

manages the day -to -day bureaucracy

27:57

of the country. And

28:00

when Raisi was president, but

28:02

he was potentially going to

28:04

be the next Supreme Leader

28:06

when he died in that

28:08

helicopter crash, they had to

28:10

have snap elections. And

28:12

the current president won those

28:14

snap elections, very low turnout. And

28:16

the hardliners didn't do very

28:18

well. And that sent a message,

28:21

I think, that was read

28:23

loud and clear that, hey, we

28:25

can't push too far. We

28:27

don't really have the support

28:29

that we think we do at

28:31

the moment. So are they

28:33

biting their time and is this

28:35

all a game? I don't

28:38

know. I'm not even sure they

28:40

know. But the important thing

28:42

is there is this window and

28:44

timing matters. And can I

28:46

tell you something? The biggest thing

28:48

that I hear from Iranians

28:50

every single day is they tell

28:52

me the world doesn't understand

28:55

us. The world thinks that Iranians

28:57

wake up every morning, burn

28:59

Israeli flags, build American

29:01

weapons, kill Jews for

29:03

dinner and that that's

29:06

their life of radicalism. It's

29:09

generally, I would say, pro -American

29:11

on the streets. It's

29:13

generally pro -Western. People like what

29:15

happens in Europe. They want

29:17

to go to Europe. They

29:19

want to travel abroad. I'm

29:22

not saying they're not religious,

29:24

but it's not a country

29:26

of fanatics by any means.

29:29

People pray. And people don't

29:31

pray. It is

29:33

not the Taliban. It

29:35

is not even as I

29:37

would say as religious on a

29:39

popular level as some countries

29:41

in the Arab world, in the

29:43

Middle East. It is a

29:46

different culture, a different people that

29:48

they believe, that Iranians

29:50

believe. the world doesn't

29:52

understand. And that's one of the

29:54

main reasons they want to re -engage. I

29:56

would say a third reason. One, first reason

29:58

to avoid a war. Second is so that they

30:00

can do business. And the third is so

30:03

that people can get to know them and get

30:05

to know what they say is the real

30:07

Iran. Yeah, absolutely. I

30:09

mean, as you say, an

30:11

extraordinary situation developing now where

30:13

just in the space of

30:15

a few weeks, we could

30:17

potentially be in a situation

30:19

where they could get into quite

30:21

serious talks about how to

30:23

curb Iran's nuclear program. Richard,

30:25

we're going to take a

30:28

break and come back and

30:30

talk about the fact that

30:32

we are getting close to 100

30:34

days of this administration and

30:36

where we we at in

30:38

terms of foreign policy. Welcome

31:00

back. So now it has been,

31:02

let's say, about 100 days into the

31:04

Trump administration. Let's talk

31:06

about that. He said

31:08

he was going to fix Ukraine on day one.

31:11

There was a little bit of an

31:13

Easter ceasefire that never really happened,

31:15

according to both sides. They both accused

31:17

each other of violating it. So

31:19

there was a tiny little pause that...

31:21

amounted to nothing. That conflict is

31:24

still ongoing. Trump and

31:26

Marco Rubio have even said, ah, if

31:28

it doesn't work, we're going to

31:30

give up. We're going to stop negotiating.

31:32

The guy who said he was going to fix

31:35

it in day one now says, oh, it's so

31:37

hard. Maybe I'm going to walk away from the

31:39

process entirely. What are you

31:41

hearing from your sources? How

31:43

are people feeling 100 days

31:45

or more or less into

31:47

Trump 2 .0? Well, Richard,

31:49

I think Steve Witkoff, who

31:51

has become this kind of

31:53

the busiest envoy for this

31:55

particular administration, I mean... He's

31:58

the busiest envoy I've ever

32:00

seen. Yeah, I mean, he's

32:02

really incredibly busy. He's single -handedly

32:04

managing all of these different

32:06

conflicts, whether it's striking a

32:08

deal with Israel and Hamas,

32:10

and I... saw him in

32:12

in Qatar, where he was

32:14

working very closely with the

32:16

the prime minister there to

32:18

try and come up with

32:21

some kind of ceasefire deal.

32:23

And we saw that take

32:25

place just days before the

32:27

inauguration. But that obviously, as

32:29

we know, has now collapsed.

32:31

And then, of course, he's also

32:34

leading the negotiations to try and

32:36

come up with some kind of

32:38

agreement between the Ukrainians and the

32:40

Russians to bring some kind of

32:42

ceasefire there. And he's constantly traveling

32:44

to Moscow and trying to speak

32:46

to Putin and trying to come

32:49

up with some kind of deal

32:51

there. And of course, he

32:53

is at the forefront of this

32:55

particular negotiation with the Iranians that

32:57

we've been talking about. He is

32:59

a real estate mogul. He is

33:01

someone who has known Trump for

33:03

decades. He's very close to the

33:05

family. He has an office in

33:07

the White House, although originally he

33:09

was supposed to be in the

33:12

State Department, but he was getting

33:14

so many calls in the day

33:16

that he was, you know, rushing

33:18

over to see Trump. He's got

33:20

open... Trump's office just as Jared

33:22

Kushner did. And Jared Kushner, Trump's

33:24

son -in -law, was so, you know,

33:27

driving a lot of Trump's foreign policy

33:29

in the first administration. And

33:31

Whitcoff is probably the closest thing to

33:33

that. He's, as I said, close to

33:35

the family. He has access to Donald

33:37

Trump. And... foreign

33:40

policy, you know, wonks and

33:42

leaders around the world, when Whitcoff

33:44

arrives, they know that the

33:46

message is coming directly from Donald

33:48

Trump. So what he says

33:50

matters, and they sit up and

33:52

they want to listen to

33:54

what he has to say. And

33:56

there are pluses and minuses

33:58

to that, to having one person

34:00

basically handling foreign policy. Whether

34:02

it's from Gaza to Iran to

34:05

Ukraine, it all goes through him. And

34:07

there's, you know, there's pluses, there's

34:09

advantages and disadvantages. The advantages, exactly as

34:11

you're saying, people take him seriously

34:13

because they know they're talking to someone

34:15

who has access to Trump, who's

34:18

in an office right next to him

34:20

and who Trump trusts. So they

34:22

take him seriously. It feels like they're

34:24

talking to Trump. The

34:26

negative side is he's basically bypassed

34:28

the State Department. He's basically

34:30

thrown the State Department away and

34:32

it's foreign policy threw on.

34:34

through an envoy. It's foreign policy

34:36

by executive order. Yeah, I

34:38

mean, things that the Secretary of

34:40

State would have done previously. You

34:43

know, we're seeing Steve Wittkopf as

34:45

Trump's envoy zipping around in his

34:47

private jet. He doesn't get a

34:49

penny from the government. These are

34:51

all things that are unheard of.

34:53

But that is what Steve Wittkopf

34:55

is doing. And he has a

34:57

direct line to John Trump. And

34:59

he's determined to get one of

35:01

these deals done. So whether it

35:03

is pushing on the Ukraine front,

35:05

and frankly, we're seeing Putin say

35:08

things like, well, I'll have an

35:10

Easter ceasefire, and then you hear

35:12

from those on the ground that

35:14

the ceasefire has been breached hundreds

35:16

of times. Zelensky himself

35:18

has said that. Or

35:20

whether we saw the collapse of

35:22

the ceasefire in Gaza and

35:24

the devastation that has continued there.

35:27

Even at the time, people describe

35:29

that particular ceasefire as fragile,

35:31

as a deal that would be

35:33

difficult to hold. And

35:35

he has struggled to

35:37

resurrect that deal. So what

35:39

we have seen now

35:42

is this administration trying to

35:44

do things on speed.

35:46

They are basically trying to

35:48

handle multiple tasks at

35:50

once, and it all feels

35:52

slightly incomplete and confusing.

35:54

It's unclear if any of

35:56

these deals are going

35:58

to get off the ground.

36:00

This particular deal with

36:03

the Iranians, I mean, you

36:05

remember famously that, you

36:07

know, the summit that Donald

36:09

Trump had with the North Korean

36:11

leader, Kim Jong -un, where he

36:13

went and he tried to

36:15

deal. Of course, and those North

36:17

Korea watchers were saying this

36:19

is just a photo op for

36:22

Kim Jong -un and it's going

36:24

to get nowhere. And

36:26

actually, I think the difference between that

36:28

and the Iran deal is the

36:30

North Koreans weren't concerned that anyone was

36:32

going to come and smash them. You

36:35

know, they were doing it for

36:37

a photo op that he wanted

36:39

to meet Donald Trump. I think

36:41

the Iranians know that there is

36:43

a lot more at stake here.

36:45

And that's why potentially we will

36:47

see concessions made from both sides

36:50

and a potential deal could be

36:52

signed between the Trump administration and

36:54

the Iranians. And that's exactly what

36:56

I was saying earlier, that neither

36:58

of us were born yesterday. There

37:01

is talk. There is movement. There's

37:03

excitement here. The government says that

37:05

it wants this deal and is

37:07

trying to show that it wants

37:09

this deal, opening up to a

37:11

degree to American journalists, to me,

37:13

and so that we can have

37:16

these kind of conversations, that I

37:18

can talk to people on the

37:20

streets. Again, unfettered

37:22

access, relatively speaking, for

37:24

Iran. I'm there

37:26

more I have more control. There's more

37:28

controls on that I felt in in

37:30

other countries than I'm feeling here I

37:32

was out the other day with our

37:34

camera. We were just walking around just

37:36

stopping people on the street putting our

37:38

tripod down Police walked by us didn't

37:40

even ask for our papers That's that's

37:42

that's shocking it for a place like

37:44

Iran I've been here in the past

37:46

soon as you put your sticks down

37:48

sticks of tripod for people who don't

37:50

know the journalistic terms as soon as

37:52

you put your sticks down The

37:55

police came and sometimes would take

37:57

you back to the police station.

37:59

I filmed in Cairo. Cairo is

38:01

harder to work than I'm finding

38:03

it to work here. When you

38:05

try and film on the streets

38:07

in Cairo, within five minutes, sometimes

38:09

less than that, the authorities are

38:11

all over you and they want

38:13

to know who you are and

38:15

there's questions and it's obstructionist. I

38:17

was talking to people on the

38:19

streets who were openly telling me

38:21

that they've had enough. Not

38:23

just of the government, but

38:26

of the entire Islamic system openly

38:28

saying that including women with

38:30

their headscarves off That's Extraordinary and

38:32

that's a I would say

38:34

for Iran quite a quite a

38:36

bold step. So they're trying

38:38

to show They want to they

38:40

want to do this deal

38:42

Whether they have no choice whether

38:44

it's real. They're doing it

38:47

the people want it, but is

38:49

it gonna fail? like the

38:51

Gaza deal fail, is it going

38:53

to fail like so far

38:55

the Ukraine talks have failed? I

38:57

don't know. The Iranians

38:59

don't know. That's the big

39:01

question. But I can tell you

39:03

this moment, there is that

39:06

window, there is that hope, and

39:08

there is that momentum from

39:10

both the state and the people

39:12

here who want to give

39:14

this a shot. And if it

39:16

does fail and suddenly there's

39:18

military action against Iran, by

39:21

Israel and there was that New York

39:23

Times report a couple of weeks ago

39:25

that said they were going to bomb,

39:27

you know, in May. And

39:29

that Trump said, let's try diplomacy

39:31

first. We'll keep military option on the

39:34

table, but let's not let's not

39:36

do that yet. So if in a

39:38

couple of months that military option

39:40

comes back and there's a conflict, I'll

39:42

look back and I will remember

39:44

the conversation we were having right now

39:47

and remember that window was open.

39:49

It was open and it was really

39:51

open for a little bit and

39:53

there really is a bit of of

39:55

momentum leading in the direction of

39:57

of trying to to engage Maybe it's

40:00

because they have a new president

40:02

Maybe because it's the women who went

40:04

out into the streets and said

40:06

they're not taking this anymore and the

40:08

police lost the the will to

40:10

to enforce a certain of these social

40:13

laws Whatever, maybe it's the economic

40:15

crisis. Whatever the reason is The currency

40:17

Going has gone up since I've

40:19

been here the the toman the Iranian

40:21

currency is gaining value because people

40:23

are encouraged by The the prospect that

40:25

there's gonna be a deal the

40:28

Iranian currency day by day since I've

40:30

been here for the last week

40:32

has gone up And that's quite significant.

40:34

It's a it's a sign of

40:36

people's confidence and I was at the

40:38

I was out last night walking

40:41

around and It was a great scene.

40:43

There were a bunch of men

40:45

and they all had their phones out

40:47

and they were looking at the

40:49

international currency rates and they were trading

40:51

gold and they were trading the

40:54

local currency and they were going back

40:56

and forth and haggling. It was

40:58

fun to watch because it was very

41:00

old fashioned of people kind of

41:02

screaming at each other and I've got

41:04

this and I've got that and

41:07

I've got this manage gold and I've

41:09

got this much currency and they

41:11

were going And the

41:13

market is heating up because

41:15

there's some optimism. Incredible.

41:18

Well, Richard, then I need to

41:20

ask you, what is your prediction

41:22

of things? I mean, you sound,

41:25

as you say, we're not

41:27

naive. We've seen these things

41:29

played out before, but you

41:31

sound cautiously optimistic. And I'm

41:33

curious to know what your

41:35

prediction is going forward and

41:37

how are things likely to

41:39

look? I

41:42

hate to be a pessimist.

41:44

I hate to be a

41:47

pessimist. But I was just

41:49

reading some old quotes from

41:51

the former Israeli prime minister,

41:53

Naftali Bennett. And

41:56

he was saying they've

41:58

never had an

42:00

opportunity like this to

42:02

strike Iran because

42:04

they have the cause,

42:06

they believe, which

42:08

was October 7th. And

42:10

they have the

42:12

means. because Iran's weapons,

42:14

external weapons, Hamas,

42:16

Hezbollah, even the Houthis are

42:18

getting weakened, they're getting attacked.

42:20

They were sort of the last

42:22

of the proxies still standing. So

42:25

Iran has never been

42:27

this vulnerable before. So

42:30

I don't, I think

42:32

there's still a decent

42:34

chance that this goes

42:36

military because there

42:39

just because there's goodwill and just

42:41

because you want something to happen.

42:44

There are plenty of people

42:46

who don't want this

42:48

to happen. There are plenty

42:50

of people who would

42:52

see this moment and see

42:54

this as a great

42:56

opportunity to try and destroy

42:58

Iran's some of Iran's

43:00

nuclear capacity. So I'm going

43:02

to do a low

43:04

prediction. I would say

43:06

it's it's still probably 50 -50

43:08

that you're gonna get a deal or you're

43:10

gonna get some sort of military action. But

43:13

if these talks break

43:15

down, there are plenty

43:18

of people in Washington

43:20

who would really like

43:22

to have a military

43:24

campaign against Iran and

43:26

see that this is

43:28

an opportunity that might

43:31

be too tempting for

43:33

them to skip. Well,

43:35

I guess for me, Richard, as

43:38

we've been discussing, I'm going

43:40

to be watching very closely the

43:42

talks with Iran. There are

43:44

more sort of meetings that are

43:46

taking place, bilaterals that are

43:48

taking place this week. And

43:50

of course, the situation in Ukraine

43:52

and Russia to see how that

43:54

unfolds, Vladimir Putin has now sort

43:56

of said, you know, has hinted

43:58

at the fact that he might want

44:00

to meet with the Ukrainians. The

44:02

last time they met, of course,

44:04

was in 2022. And those

44:06

talks fell apart. The two leaders didn't,

44:08

but they had teams that were meeting.

44:11

And of course, as we

44:13

march towards 100 days of

44:16

the Trump administration, Trump 2 .0,

44:18

I'm curious to know who is

44:21

going to remain in the court

44:23

of Trump and who leaves, whether

44:25

the Pete Hegseth is ousted, because

44:27

of course there's been more

44:29

revelations around Signalgate and that

44:31

he shared contents of that

44:33

with family and friends, and

44:36

that's landed him in hot water.

44:39

And of course, Elon Musk, who

44:41

we know that he's going to

44:43

be leaving this administration very soon.

44:45

So, you know, no surprises really

44:47

in terms of the shifts and

44:49

changes. It's taken almost three months

44:51

now. We saw the chaos in

44:53

the first Trump administration where people were

44:55

being hired and fired almost every other

44:57

week. So what

44:59

made this administration... different

45:02

from the first was the

45:04

fact that they seemed

45:06

from the outset more organized,

45:08

more focused, less kind

45:10

of leaks that we were

45:12

seeing, you know, fewer

45:14

people who were working against

45:16

the plans of the

45:18

president. And yet we are

45:20

starting to see cracks because of

45:22

the level of chaos and confusion and

45:24

the fact that things remain incomplete.

45:27

So that's what I will be focusing

45:29

on in the next week or

45:31

so. And Yalta, before we go, there's

45:33

one thing. Because if you

45:35

notice on this prediction, I was

45:37

like, well, let me, 55%, it

45:39

breaks down, 45%, it works. And

45:41

that if it breaks down, it

45:43

breaks down badly, right? Which

45:45

is, that's not a great prediction. That's still

45:47

a, it can go either way. It's kind

45:50

of a, I don't to

45:52

say cowardly, but it's not

45:54

a very decisive prediction because

45:56

it's really still fluid. And

45:58

one of the reasons that

46:00

we haven't talked about that

46:02

is very interesting is the

46:04

role of Saudi Arabia. The

46:07

Saudi Arabian Defense Minister was just

46:09

here, was just in Iran, and

46:11

is backing this deal. And

46:14

that's very different. The

46:16

Saudis and generally all the Gulf

46:18

countries didn't want this deal

46:20

to happen. Under Obama they didn't

46:22

like the deal. They didn't

46:25

want Iran breaking out of its

46:27

box. They wanted to destroy

46:29

This country and keep it as

46:31

weak as possible because of

46:33

this ancient Persian Arab rivalry because

46:35

of oil competition, you know

46:38

Who controls the the the Gulf?

46:40

Is it the Arabian Gulf

46:42

or is it the Persian Gulf?

46:44

This there's an old old

46:46

animosity here this time the Saudis

46:48

seem to be supporting this

46:51

process And there's still talk

46:53

rumors in the background, but it

46:55

was rumors circulating in Tehran when

46:57

the defense minister, who is the

46:59

brother of Mohammed bin Salman, was

47:02

here. The talk was, maybe

47:05

he's here because he's

47:07

trying to organize a

47:09

final peace summit in

47:11

Saudi Arabia where President

47:13

Trump goes and signs

47:15

this deal. So

47:17

the fact that the Saudis were here

47:20

and the fact that the Saudis

47:22

are into it and that the Saudis

47:24

are playing such a central role

47:26

in a lot of these negotiations, that's

47:29

an encouraging

47:31

sign. And so I

47:33

would say something to watch

47:35

would be watch Saudis position

47:37

vis -a -vis Iran and what

47:39

Saudi Arabia has to say

47:41

about the negotiations because I

47:43

think it's different and significant.

47:45

Yeah, absolutely. As you say,

47:47

different and significant. Richard,

47:49

really good to speak to you

47:52

again this week and this

47:54

time from Tehran. And I'm looking

47:56

forward to seeing you very

47:58

soon. And thank you to our

48:00

listeners for listening. Thank you

48:02

all of our listeners. It's great

48:05

to connect with you, great

48:07

to talk to people every week.

48:09

Sorry we missed Easter. We'll

48:11

be back and keep

48:14

it going. Please send

48:16

us questions at theworldatsky

48:18

.uk and follow us

48:20

wherever you get your podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features