Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
I'm for stopping Iran very simply
0:06
from having a nuclear weapon. They
0:08
can't have a nuclear weapon. I
0:10
want Iran to be great
0:12
and prosperous and terrific. When
0:18
I went to the Iranian parliament the
0:20
other day, people said, I've never
0:22
remember a time when an American journalist
0:25
was there inside the Iranian parliament
0:27
watching the sessions, talking to member of
0:29
the National Security Committee. It made
0:31
the blogs. Hello
0:36
and welcome to the world. I'm
0:38
Yalda and I'm currently in
0:41
London and I'm Richard Engel and I
0:43
am in Tehran at the moment the
0:45
capital of Iran and it is wonderful
0:47
to be here interesting times and Great
0:49
to see you Yalda. We're gonna have
0:51
a lot to talk about today. This
0:53
is a pretty rare trip for me
0:55
I've been to Iran a few times,
0:57
but I haven't been here for years And
1:00
Allah has changed since I was last
1:02
in this country. A lot is
1:04
going on. Diplomacy, nuclear
1:06
talks, cultural changes seem
1:08
to be afoot here. It's
1:11
an exciting time and I can't wait to
1:13
unpack it. Yeah, absolutely. I can't
1:15
wait to hear about it. Richard,
1:17
of course, we were both off last
1:19
week and you were traveling. So
1:22
really great to see you again and
1:24
to be back on the podcast. So let's
1:26
get started. And for those of you
1:28
who aren't already subscribed, thank you for
1:30
those who did it. Please do. It
1:33
helps us. It helps us bring
1:35
this show to you. So
1:37
please do that. And if you
1:39
can and you want to and feel
1:41
inspired, write in with thoughts, comments,
1:43
questions. We love receiving them at the
1:45
usual place, theworldatsky
1:48
.uk. So
1:57
I am in Iran and
2:00
itself is an extraordinary statement
2:02
because this is generally not
2:04
a country that lets in
2:06
many journalists, certainly doesn't let
2:08
in many American reporters. And
2:11
I'm here for about two weeks,
2:13
which is a pretty long trip
2:15
for Iran. When I came in
2:17
the past, I got a five
2:19
day visa. Every step we took,
2:21
we were accompanied by minders. This
2:24
time I have a longer visa,
2:26
and when I'm out on the
2:28
streets and been walking around, maybe
2:31
we're being followed in the background, maybe
2:33
we're being monitored, but we're not
2:35
required to leave the hotel with binders.
2:37
We are able to walk around,
2:39
talk to people, go shopping,
2:41
do interviews, do interviews on
2:43
the streets, and
2:45
people are giving us a very
2:48
warm welcome. I was in the
2:50
Grand Bazaar just yesterday. The central
2:52
market, the covered market, sort of
2:54
looks like the one in Istanbul,
2:56
miles of corridors, and they sell
2:58
spices and carpets. It's a beautiful,
3:00
fascinating place. And as
3:02
I was walking around, first people
3:04
thought that maybe we were a group of
3:06
tourists, and I could hear them saying, oh, Americans
3:08
are tourists. And they were very excited. And
3:10
I was getting thumbs up. And then when we
3:12
took out the camera, it was pretty clear
3:15
that we were journalists and we were interviewing people.
3:17
And they were more excited. And
3:19
they were more happy because
3:21
they thought it's a sign. It's a
3:23
sign that this country is opening
3:25
up. These nuclear talks
3:28
that are going on
3:30
between the United States and
3:32
Iran have created a
3:34
lot of excitement. They've created
3:36
a lot of excitement because people hope
3:38
that it means that there won't
3:40
be an attack on Iran, even though
3:42
President Trump says it's still on
3:44
the table and the Israelis have talked
3:46
about carrying out attacks on the
3:48
nuclear sites numerous times. So they
3:50
think, OK, if there's talks, there
3:53
won't be some sort of military strikes.
3:55
And they're really hopeful that it
3:57
will lift sanctions and that a
3:59
deal will allow Iranians to get
4:01
out of this box that they
4:03
are living in. Because when
4:05
you're here and live here, You
4:07
can't really do business with
4:09
the world. You're cut off. You
4:12
can't use credit cards. You can't
4:14
send money abroad. It's
4:16
very difficult to travel.
4:18
If you have a bank account
4:20
and you have it in
4:22
Iranian currency, you're at the whims
4:24
of inflation. So
4:27
people here feel
4:29
maybe they can break out of
4:31
this box, re -engage with the world
4:33
politically, socially, economically, and
4:36
that could... people's
4:38
daily lives. A country
4:40
of 90 million that wants
4:42
to trade, travel, engage
4:44
is now feeling a sense
4:47
of excitement that it
4:49
might be coming and that
4:51
is making it a
4:53
very exciting time to be
4:55
here. Yeah, absolutely,
4:57
Richard. for
5:00
decades. The Iranian people have survived
5:02
under these sanctions at different points when
5:04
they've gone head to head with
5:06
the West, when the regime has gone
5:08
head to head with the West.
5:11
And often the regime has tried to
5:13
point the finger of blame on
5:15
the United States, on the West for
5:18
the state of the nation. And they've
5:20
said it's because of the sanctions
5:22
that you are living the way that
5:24
you are. But we have seen
5:26
now, certainly in the last few
5:28
years, that the Iranian people
5:30
are saying to the regime, enough. We've
5:32
had enough of you. We want
5:34
change. We want you gone. And we've
5:37
seen that in different movements. We
5:39
saw that in the Green Revolution in
5:41
2009. We saw, just in the
5:43
last couple of years, with the women's
5:45
movement, where there was an uprising
5:47
led by the so -called TikTok generation,
5:49
where these young teenage girls stood up
5:52
and said to the regime, we
5:54
are not going to be forced to
5:56
wear this headscarf off the back of
5:58
the death of a young Masa
6:00
Amini. We
6:02
can see the different
6:04
crossroads that this nation
6:07
continues to be in, but
6:09
I'm so fascinated, Richard,
6:11
because we both covered the story of
6:13
the women's movement over the course of
6:15
the last couple of years. Just tell
6:18
me, being in Iran, as you say,
6:20
really difficult to get into the country,
6:22
I certainly haven't. sort of attempted to
6:24
go. I worked at the
6:26
BBC for years and it was really difficult
6:28
for a BBC journalist to enter the
6:30
country. But this is now a
6:32
moment where suddenly the regime is
6:34
opening up and we know in the
6:36
past that journalists have been arrested.
6:39
An Italian journalist a few months ago
6:41
was arrested and the Italians had
6:43
to release an Iranian to get
6:45
the journalist out. First of
6:47
all just as you say you feel
6:49
more welcome there at ten days is a
6:51
long time to be there But just
6:53
what are you seeing when you capturing in
6:55
terms of the mood more than ten days? We've
6:57
asked for an extension. I think it's going to be
6:59
granted And that's
7:01
not the kind of reception that
7:03
I've had here in the
7:05
past. It's not that I'm
7:07
naive, you know, just because we're being welcomed
7:09
and we're giving more access and gotten
7:11
a visa and I'm getting some thumbs up
7:13
from people on the streets. It doesn't
7:15
mean, oh, everything is great, you know, everything
7:17
is perfect in Iran. That would be,
7:19
you know... would be foolish. I've been doing
7:21
this business too long to be fooled
7:23
by that. But let's talk about the women.
7:25
And then we'll talk about the nuclear
7:27
issue because it's fascinating and people might not
7:29
understand it. But let's talk about the women's issue
7:32
in particular. This is one
7:34
of the most sensitive issues and
7:36
one of the issues that's really
7:38
at the cultural and political heart
7:40
of the regime is women. and
7:43
women's dress and women's rights
7:45
and how women present themselves
7:47
in public. You are
7:49
officially required as a woman
7:51
here to wear a veil in
7:53
public. And in every restaurant
7:55
you go into, there's a sign
7:57
on the wall, and there's
7:59
a picture of a woman wearing a
8:01
veil. And it says, please, in
8:04
these premises, according to the law,
8:06
wear Islamic dress. There
8:08
are usually multiple signs in every shop,
8:10
every cafe, in the hotel where I'm
8:12
staying, in the lobby, everywhere these signs
8:14
up. And people aren't listening to them anymore.
8:17
And people aren't listening to them brazenly.
8:20
You walk down the street and
8:22
I would say just by
8:25
observation, maybe
8:27
30%, 40 %
8:29
of women are not
8:31
wearing head scarves anymore. They
8:34
will have a little scarf.
8:36
around their necks in case there's
8:38
an issue in case maybe
8:40
like a police officer comes up
8:42
to them they can quickly
8:44
just put it over their over
8:46
their hair but they're
8:48
just keeping it around their necks and
8:50
they're walking by the police
8:52
stations they're walking by
8:55
government ministries i've seen people
8:57
walking with the women
8:59
with their hair out
9:01
walking right past groups
9:03
of of of
9:05
what you would consider the morality
9:07
police, and they don't say
9:09
anything. They have stopped
9:11
enforcing it on a
9:13
daily basis, and that
9:15
is a significant change.
9:18
I don't think they've given up. I'm not
9:20
sure that this is the end of the
9:22
road, but... was a movement here. It
9:25
lasted a couple of
9:27
years. It turned quite violent.
9:29
There was a death
9:31
of at least one. Several
9:33
protesters had violent encounters. It
9:35
was a brutal crackdown. But it
9:38
seems to have made a difference
9:40
because the government, at least
9:42
right now, has decided
9:44
it doesn't want that fight and
9:46
it is not picking that fight. And
9:49
people here are hoping that
9:51
that is the start of significant
9:53
changes now. It could be
9:55
temporary It could be that the
9:57
government has other priorities right
9:59
now and therefore is put this
10:01
one on the back burner But
10:03
it is happening and it is
10:05
obvious and people are talking
10:07
about it. I did a television
10:09
interview American television with
10:11
a woman just a couple of
10:13
days ago long hair Down to her
10:15
down to below her shoulders And
10:18
she did the interview
10:20
on camera without
10:22
a headscarf on. Now,
10:25
that would have been unthinkable. Even in North
10:27
Tehran a few years ago, you know, people
10:29
may not have been wearing them or they
10:31
were barely wearing them. But if we interviewed
10:33
them on camera, they would quickly, you know,
10:35
wrap themselves up so they wouldn't get in
10:37
trouble, even if they found it personally annoying. Now,
10:41
she said, ah, let's do it and didn't
10:43
care. And that's a
10:45
sense of confidence that I've never
10:47
seen in this country. Yeah,
10:49
I mean, that is incredibly brave.
10:51
We can't overstate how brave
10:53
it is because it was a
10:55
death sentence before for these
10:57
women. It was unthinkable for them
10:59
not to... their headscarves on.
11:01
It was very much linked to
11:03
the Islamic Revolution of 1979.
11:05
And this has been something that's
11:08
been enforced for decades. So
11:10
for these women to say now,
11:12
I don't want to wear
11:14
this. And why this is linked,
11:16
Richard, to the current state
11:18
of play needs to be explained
11:20
as well. Because of course,
11:22
we are now seeing this
11:24
regime in talks again with
11:26
the Trump administration and let's
11:28
just remind our audiences where
11:30
we're at because when we
11:32
talk about the original Iran
11:34
nuclear deal, the one that
11:36
the Obama administration put together.
11:39
Now, that was about a
11:41
decade in the making. And
11:43
it was, you know, the Europeans were on board, the
11:46
Americans were driving it. And
11:48
it was basically to curb
11:50
Iran's nuclear program to ensure that
11:52
Iran wasn't going to weaponize
11:54
its nuclear program and be a
11:56
threat to the region and
11:58
the global community. Now,
12:01
what happened? to
12:03
that deal, which was the
12:05
JCPOA, the Joint Comprehensive
12:08
Plan of Action. You
12:10
remember during Donald Trump's
12:12
first administration, he came in
12:14
and he ripped up
12:16
the JCPOA, the Iran nuclear
12:18
deal. And he said, you
12:20
know, that he felt that the Obama
12:22
administration had made so many concessions that
12:25
he would have walked away from it.
12:27
He described it as the worst deal
12:29
ever. And he applied at that point,
12:31
maximum pressure on Iran.
12:34
And so another deal. to
12:36
ease sanctions to bring Iran to
12:38
the nuclear table was never really
12:40
enforced, not under the Biden administration.
12:42
It was toyed with, it was
12:44
flirted with, but it never, never
12:46
came about. Trump has
12:49
decided that he's going to send
12:51
a clear message to the
12:53
Iranian regime. You either come
12:55
to the negotiating table, you make
12:57
concessions, or we're going to smash
12:59
you. essentially. That is the message
13:01
that he sent. He sent a
13:03
letter to Ayatollah Khamenei a few
13:05
weeks ago and basically said, look,
13:07
we want to talk, you've got
13:09
to come to the table. There
13:12
are many people who are
13:14
now saying basically that it is
13:16
going to be a revival
13:18
of the JCPOA. The Iranians
13:20
want it. The Americans want
13:22
it. The Trump administration needs
13:24
this deal. They need a
13:26
win of some sort. Trump
13:29
made all sorts of claims
13:31
during the campaign. And as
13:33
we sort of head towards
13:35
100 days of his second
13:37
term, three months in,
13:39
what he has said from the
13:41
beginning is, I'm going to make a
13:43
deal on ending the war in
13:45
Gaza. The ceasefire broke
13:47
down. I'm going to bring an
13:49
end to the war in Ukraine within
13:52
24 hours. I mean within It's
13:54
been almost a hundred days. He hasn't
13:56
been able to bring the two
13:58
sides to the negotiating table So the
14:00
one liked in all of this
14:02
for Trump is Iran now because
14:04
they have had several rounds of
14:06
talks in in Rome in Oman
14:08
They're looking at another round of
14:10
talks soon And why this matters,
14:12
what you're saying about the women in
14:14
the situation in Iran to circle it all
14:16
back, is the Iranian regime needs
14:19
this too. We've seen over the course
14:21
of the last year, the
14:23
proxies that they have built up
14:25
in the region, Hezbollah, Hamas,
14:27
the Houthis, the groups that they
14:29
have backed, this so -called axis
14:31
of resistance or axis of
14:33
evil or upheaval, has more
14:35
or less been dismantled by
14:38
the Israelis. They
14:40
are facing backlash
14:42
at home through what you're
14:44
talking about now, not just
14:46
because of the sanctions and
14:48
people are living in dire
14:50
conditions, but also because people
14:52
are saying, we don't want you anymore. And
14:55
thirdly, they want to be able
14:57
to make some kind of deal now
14:59
with the Americans. And that's,
15:01
first of all, exactly brilliant
15:03
summary of where we are
15:05
right now in the JCPOA
15:08
that broke down. So
15:10
I mentioned why the Iranian people want
15:12
a deal, right? They don't want to
15:14
be attacked. They don't want to fight
15:16
with the United States. They don't want
15:18
to see Tehran bombed. Tehran, by the
15:20
way, is a huge city. You know,
15:22
it's a city on the size of
15:24
Istanbul, with you include the outer suburbs.
15:27
This is a city of roughly
15:29
20 million people. Iran has about
15:31
85, 90 million people, total
15:33
population, and a large percentage
15:36
of them live in Tehran.
15:39
Tehran... don't want to see bomb.
15:41
They don't want to see war. They watch
15:43
what happened in Gaza. They don't want any
15:45
part of it. They don't want it. They
15:47
want to do business with the world, and
15:49
they want sanctions to be lifted, and they
15:51
hope this deal will allow that. Now,
15:54
people are talking about the
15:56
nuclear deal, the enrichment
15:59
deal, and you don't need to be
16:01
a nuclear scientist to understand the deal. It's
16:03
pretty simple. Shall we talk about it for
16:05
a second? Go ahead. There
16:08
is a nuclear program here. It's based on
16:10
uranium. And uranium, of
16:12
course, is an element. It's
16:14
a radioactive element. And
16:16
you can dig it out of the ground. But
16:18
when you dig it out of the ground, it
16:20
doesn't do very much. It just sort of emits
16:22
radiation. In order to make it useful, you
16:24
have to enrich it. And the way
16:26
you enrich uranium, one of
16:28
the ways is you spin
16:31
it. you put it a centrifuge
16:33
and you spin it and
16:35
spin it and spin it and
16:37
spin it until it gets
16:39
more and more concentrated because the
16:41
heavier bits are thrown out
16:43
toward the end of a centrifuge
16:46
and you enrich it. And
16:48
that's what it's really all about
16:50
because in order to have
16:52
a weapons grade, to have weapons
16:54
grade uranium, it needs to
16:56
be about 90 % pure. So
16:58
highly enriched, really dangerous uranium that
17:01
you could use to make
17:03
a nuclear weapon. And
17:05
the IAEA believes that
17:07
they have enough 60 %
17:09
enriched uranium that they
17:12
could take that 60%,
17:14
quickly move it up
17:16
to 90 % and
17:18
then make a bomb. What
17:21
the deal would be... don't
17:23
exactly know the deals are
17:25
happening behind closed doors, but
17:28
the general framework would be
17:30
that Iran would agree not
17:32
to enrich very to high
17:34
levels, not to enrich to
17:36
anything close to a weapons
17:39
grade uranium. They would keep
17:41
it at low levels, which
17:43
you can still use to
17:45
make power. They would
17:47
take the the more highly enriched stuff
17:49
that they already have, send it out
17:51
of the country, they would
17:54
be allowed to make the
17:56
low level enriched uranium for
17:58
civilian purposes, and that they
18:00
would be monitored and have
18:02
frequent monitors to make sure
18:04
that they don't go above
18:06
a certain threshold. And that
18:08
in exchange for doing that, getting
18:10
rid of the highly enriched
18:12
uranium, allowing in monitors that
18:14
it would get sanctions relief.
18:16
the threat of a military action
18:18
would go away and there
18:20
would be peace, prosperity and a
18:22
new page for Iran. It's
18:25
possible. It's not and it's not that
18:27
different. That was the basic framework of
18:29
the Obama deal. And
18:31
many Iranians believe that Trump tore up
18:33
that deal and he's going to and
18:35
he's going to fight to put a
18:37
very similar deal back in place, but
18:39
that he tore it up because he
18:41
didn't like Obama. He tore it up
18:43
because Obama did it and he wants
18:46
the deal. that he does. And
18:48
so even if it's very similar, it
18:50
will be his deal with his man,
18:52
and he would get the... credit for it?
18:54
Not just the credit, but the Nobel
18:56
Peace Prize that he is after. I mean,
18:58
if he gets one of these deals,
19:01
whether it's Ukraine, whether it's Iran, whether
19:03
he changes the JCPOA
19:05
even slightly, he we
19:07
know is after this Nobel
19:09
Peace Prize. And so if
19:11
he is able to strike
19:14
something out of this with
19:16
the Iranians, whether or not
19:18
it's a two -pager, the
19:20
original JCPOA was this comprehensive
19:22
document that had the biggest
19:24
brains in terms of understanding
19:26
nuclear programs on the planet,
19:29
working on it from Europe
19:31
and the United States. But
19:33
this could be quite a
19:35
sort a two -pager that he
19:37
brings out slightly tweaks, makes a
19:39
few changes. Now, the biggest
19:41
problem here, Richard, I think, is...
19:44
If the United States asks for too
19:46
much or if the United States
19:48
asks for too little and you know
19:50
The Israelis that I've been speaking
19:52
to have said the concern is
19:54
they will ask for too little They
19:56
will make so many concessions and
19:59
give the Iranians so much in return
20:01
the Iranians will think well We
20:03
need to come to the negotiating
20:05
table for all of the reasons that
20:07
we've just stated whether it's sanctions
20:09
relief whether it's because they're proxies and
20:11
the groups that they've been supporting
20:14
for decades have been smashed in
20:16
the region or whether it's domestic problems
20:18
that they're currently facing and this
20:20
rising, this uprising of voices that are
20:22
turning against the regime, they need
20:24
this as much as the Trump
20:26
administration does. So we'll have to see
20:29
how it plays out and whether
20:31
the Americans do make the sort of
20:33
concessions that the Israelis certainly are
20:35
concerned that they will. So the
20:37
other question is... Well, what about the
20:39
regime? Why does the regime care?
20:41
The regime wants this deal. The regime
20:44
says it wants this deal. The
20:47
supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei
20:49
says that he's endorsed the
20:51
deal. And I was
20:53
at Friday prayers. I was
20:55
one of the first Westerners
20:57
inside the main mosque at
20:59
Tehran University on Army Day
21:01
when it was full of
21:03
soldiers and people who would
21:05
be considered real hardliners and
21:07
I was listening to the
21:10
sermon and the preacher was
21:12
saying, we don't
21:14
trust the Americans, don't think
21:16
they're our friends, but we're still
21:18
gonna talk because, and
21:20
then he cited Quranic verses and Islamic
21:22
traditions, it was a sermon after
21:24
all, to say why negotiations are important
21:26
and why it's important to have
21:28
dialogue even with people you don't agree
21:31
with. So the question is, why?
21:33
Why? Why are they doing this? One,
21:35
I think they're feeling a lot
21:37
of economic pressure because the economy here
21:39
is in difficult state. It's
21:42
difficult for the people to trade and
21:44
to, you know, they can't use credit cards
21:46
and sell things. And, you know, this
21:48
country produces a lot of beautiful things, not
21:50
just carpets and pistachios and saffron, although
21:52
all those are fabulous. But they
21:54
also have industry and they want to engage
21:56
and they want to sell and they want
21:58
to They want the world to know their
22:00
market and they want it to sell things. The
22:03
government needs that income because right now
22:05
they're basically just selling their oil to
22:07
China and they're using the fleets of
22:09
old tankers and it's a very, there's
22:11
a lot of smuggling and it's complicated
22:13
and it's expensive for them because anytime
22:16
you have to operate in sort of
22:18
the gray economy, you lose a lot
22:20
of money. So they need the money,
22:23
that's definite. They
22:25
are in a weakened position
22:27
for the exact reasons you mentioned.
22:30
Look what's just happened in the last couple of
22:32
years. Iran, its
22:34
strength, its power was
22:36
always through its ability to
22:39
maintain control at home,
22:41
which through its security services,
22:43
through surveillance, through
22:45
the laws and through
22:47
the different security apparatuses
22:49
here. their
22:52
ability to protect themselves by
22:54
a network of proxies,
22:56
a network of armor. I
22:58
like to think of
23:00
it as Iran's outer coat
23:02
of armor. And
23:04
that outer coat of armor, let's
23:06
call it weapons, if
23:08
you will, was
23:10
strategically placed. around Israel in
23:13
order to send a message
23:15
to Israel don't think about
23:17
bombing us because we can
23:19
hurt you and They they
23:21
had very close relations with
23:24
Hamas in Gaza right on
23:26
the border, of course with
23:28
Israel They had very very
23:30
close relations with Hezbollah, which
23:32
is right to the north
23:34
of Israel They had a
23:37
very very close relations with
23:39
Bashar al -Assad of Syria all
23:41
three of those are either
23:43
decimated, weakened, or
23:45
in Bashar al -Assad's case, gone. So
23:48
their armor has been
23:50
removed. So are
23:52
they coming to the table now
23:55
because they have no choice,
23:57
because they need the money and
23:59
because they're not in the
24:01
same military position that they were?
24:04
Or is this real? Is this
24:06
a real change? Is this the
24:08
start of a process That
24:10
is going to be transformative
24:12
and I think Iranians don't really
24:15
know they're hopeful that it's
24:17
it's it's it's the latter But
24:19
they're also willing to take
24:21
the risk That that it's the
24:23
former that even if Iran
24:25
is doing this because it's under
24:27
pressure Iranians will say well
24:29
who cares as long as they're
24:31
taking these steps for whatever
24:33
reason maybe it leads to a
24:35
more positive outcome for them
24:37
politically socially economically But the
24:39
change, at least for now,
24:41
is happening. It's real. Now,
24:44
I don't know if this window is going to close. It's
24:47
possible that in a couple of months,
24:50
Trump decides, you
24:53
know, I've tried my best. I
24:55
wanted these negotiations to work, but they
24:57
were a failure and the military
24:59
strikes happened. That's still very possible. You
25:01
know, again, neither of us were
25:03
born yesterday. And there are
25:06
splits within the administration. Those
25:08
hardliners, Iran hawks, you know, the
25:10
Mike Walters of the world
25:12
who say, listen, you know, we
25:14
know how this regime operates
25:16
and they are just trying to
25:18
buy time here. They want
25:20
a nuclear bomb. They want to
25:22
acquire a nuclear weapon. And
25:24
therefore, they are just saying what
25:26
needs to be said because
25:28
it's a short -term sort of
25:30
gain for Trump. And maybe. And
25:32
maybe. But either way, it's
25:34
happening. We are in this window
25:36
now. a
25:38
window opens more and
25:40
more air comes
25:42
in, or the window
25:44
is smashed, closed, and
25:47
breaks into shards of glass, we
25:49
will see. And I think we
25:51
will see in the next few months.
25:53
But at the moment right now,
25:55
diplomacy does seem to be moving quickly
25:57
and does seem to be making
25:59
some Richard, I
26:01
do want to sort of ask
26:04
a little bit more on
26:06
that because there are those within
26:08
Israel, for example, that are
26:10
incredibly concerned that actually, you
26:12
know, I mean, I spoke
26:14
to some contacts yesterday who said, if
26:16
we go back to the JCPOA,
26:18
that particular deal, it's the... best of
26:21
the sort of the worst deals
26:23
that could possibly, the worst outcomes that
26:25
could possibly come out of this. So
26:27
it's not so bad if we go
26:30
back to that Obama nuclear deal. There
26:32
are others who believe, as we
26:34
were just saying, that actually Iran
26:36
is just, you know, they're playing
26:38
games and they, just like they
26:41
are allowing women to wear headscarves,
26:43
but actually the long term plan
26:45
is to get everyone back into
26:47
line. that they have
26:49
the same attitude towards their nuclear
26:51
ambitions, that they do want
26:53
to weaponize their nuclear program. And
26:55
it could all be a
26:57
trick. It could be that once
26:59
they get more surveillance technology
27:01
in place and they do have
27:03
good relations with China, they
27:06
could easily, if they could afford it, buy
27:08
AI -enabled cameras that could
27:11
detect women wearing headscarfs and
27:13
launch a major crackdown, all
27:15
of these things are possible.
27:17
And it is It is
27:19
possible that we suddenly have
27:22
a reverse in this trend,
27:24
certainly possible. But the
27:26
government here is one of
27:28
the most open -minded and flexible
27:30
the president that they've had
27:33
in many years. And
27:35
the hardliners recognized, there were
27:37
elections. You remember, Raisi, the former
27:39
president, died in that helicopter
27:41
crash. This mysterious helicopter crash, right?
27:43
And he was a hardliner.
27:45
He was someone who people thought
27:47
could be the next supreme
27:49
leader. The supreme leader is the
27:51
Ayatollah who runs the theocracy.
27:53
The president is the one who
27:55
manages the day -to -day bureaucracy
27:57
of the country. And
28:00
when Raisi was president, but
28:02
he was potentially going to
28:04
be the next Supreme Leader
28:06
when he died in that
28:08
helicopter crash, they had to
28:10
have snap elections. And
28:12
the current president won those
28:14
snap elections, very low turnout. And
28:16
the hardliners didn't do very
28:18
well. And that sent a message,
28:21
I think, that was read
28:23
loud and clear that, hey, we
28:25
can't push too far. We
28:27
don't really have the support
28:29
that we think we do at
28:31
the moment. So are they
28:33
biting their time and is this
28:35
all a game? I don't
28:38
know. I'm not even sure they
28:40
know. But the important thing
28:42
is there is this window and
28:44
timing matters. And can I
28:46
tell you something? The biggest thing
28:48
that I hear from Iranians
28:50
every single day is they tell
28:52
me the world doesn't understand
28:55
us. The world thinks that Iranians
28:57
wake up every morning, burn
28:59
Israeli flags, build American
29:01
weapons, kill Jews for
29:03
dinner and that that's
29:06
their life of radicalism. It's
29:09
generally, I would say, pro -American
29:11
on the streets. It's
29:13
generally pro -Western. People like what
29:15
happens in Europe. They want
29:17
to go to Europe. They
29:19
want to travel abroad. I'm
29:22
not saying they're not religious,
29:24
but it's not a country
29:26
of fanatics by any means.
29:29
People pray. And people don't
29:31
pray. It is
29:33
not the Taliban. It
29:35
is not even as I
29:37
would say as religious on a
29:39
popular level as some countries
29:41
in the Arab world, in the
29:43
Middle East. It is a
29:46
different culture, a different people that
29:48
they believe, that Iranians
29:50
believe. the world doesn't
29:52
understand. And that's one of the
29:54
main reasons they want to re -engage. I
29:56
would say a third reason. One, first reason
29:58
to avoid a war. Second is so that they
30:00
can do business. And the third is so
30:03
that people can get to know them and get
30:05
to know what they say is the real
30:07
Iran. Yeah, absolutely. I
30:09
mean, as you say, an
30:11
extraordinary situation developing now where
30:13
just in the space of
30:15
a few weeks, we could
30:17
potentially be in a situation
30:19
where they could get into quite
30:21
serious talks about how to
30:23
curb Iran's nuclear program. Richard,
30:25
we're going to take a
30:28
break and come back and
30:30
talk about the fact that
30:32
we are getting close to 100
30:34
days of this administration and
30:36
where we we at in
30:38
terms of foreign policy. Welcome
31:00
back. So now it has been,
31:02
let's say, about 100 days into the
31:04
Trump administration. Let's talk
31:06
about that. He said
31:08
he was going to fix Ukraine on day one.
31:11
There was a little bit of an
31:13
Easter ceasefire that never really happened,
31:15
according to both sides. They both accused
31:17
each other of violating it. So
31:19
there was a tiny little pause that...
31:21
amounted to nothing. That conflict is
31:24
still ongoing. Trump and
31:26
Marco Rubio have even said, ah, if
31:28
it doesn't work, we're going to
31:30
give up. We're going to stop negotiating.
31:32
The guy who said he was going to fix
31:35
it in day one now says, oh, it's so
31:37
hard. Maybe I'm going to walk away from the
31:39
process entirely. What are you
31:41
hearing from your sources? How
31:43
are people feeling 100 days
31:45
or more or less into
31:47
Trump 2 .0? Well, Richard,
31:49
I think Steve Witkoff, who
31:51
has become this kind of
31:53
the busiest envoy for this
31:55
particular administration, I mean... He's
31:58
the busiest envoy I've ever
32:00
seen. Yeah, I mean, he's
32:02
really incredibly busy. He's single -handedly
32:04
managing all of these different
32:06
conflicts, whether it's striking a
32:08
deal with Israel and Hamas,
32:10
and I... saw him in
32:12
in Qatar, where he was
32:14
working very closely with the
32:16
the prime minister there to
32:18
try and come up with
32:21
some kind of ceasefire deal.
32:23
And we saw that take
32:25
place just days before the
32:27
inauguration. But that obviously, as
32:29
we know, has now collapsed.
32:31
And then, of course, he's also
32:34
leading the negotiations to try and
32:36
come up with some kind of
32:38
agreement between the Ukrainians and the
32:40
Russians to bring some kind of
32:42
ceasefire there. And he's constantly traveling
32:44
to Moscow and trying to speak
32:46
to Putin and trying to come
32:49
up with some kind of deal
32:51
there. And of course, he
32:53
is at the forefront of this
32:55
particular negotiation with the Iranians that
32:57
we've been talking about. He is
32:59
a real estate mogul. He is
33:01
someone who has known Trump for
33:03
decades. He's very close to the
33:05
family. He has an office in
33:07
the White House, although originally he
33:09
was supposed to be in the
33:12
State Department, but he was getting
33:14
so many calls in the day
33:16
that he was, you know, rushing
33:18
over to see Trump. He's got
33:20
open... Trump's office just as Jared
33:22
Kushner did. And Jared Kushner, Trump's
33:24
son -in -law, was so, you know,
33:27
driving a lot of Trump's foreign policy
33:29
in the first administration. And
33:31
Whitcoff is probably the closest thing to
33:33
that. He's, as I said, close to
33:35
the family. He has access to Donald
33:37
Trump. And... foreign
33:40
policy, you know, wonks and
33:42
leaders around the world, when Whitcoff
33:44
arrives, they know that the
33:46
message is coming directly from Donald
33:48
Trump. So what he says
33:50
matters, and they sit up and
33:52
they want to listen to
33:54
what he has to say. And
33:56
there are pluses and minuses
33:58
to that, to having one person
34:00
basically handling foreign policy. Whether
34:02
it's from Gaza to Iran to
34:05
Ukraine, it all goes through him. And
34:07
there's, you know, there's pluses, there's
34:09
advantages and disadvantages. The advantages, exactly as
34:11
you're saying, people take him seriously
34:13
because they know they're talking to someone
34:15
who has access to Trump, who's
34:18
in an office right next to him
34:20
and who Trump trusts. So they
34:22
take him seriously. It feels like they're
34:24
talking to Trump. The
34:26
negative side is he's basically bypassed
34:28
the State Department. He's basically
34:30
thrown the State Department away and
34:32
it's foreign policy threw on.
34:34
through an envoy. It's foreign policy
34:36
by executive order. Yeah, I
34:38
mean, things that the Secretary of
34:40
State would have done previously. You
34:43
know, we're seeing Steve Wittkopf as
34:45
Trump's envoy zipping around in his
34:47
private jet. He doesn't get a
34:49
penny from the government. These are
34:51
all things that are unheard of.
34:53
But that is what Steve Wittkopf
34:55
is doing. And he has a
34:57
direct line to John Trump. And
34:59
he's determined to get one of
35:01
these deals done. So whether it
35:03
is pushing on the Ukraine front,
35:05
and frankly, we're seeing Putin say
35:08
things like, well, I'll have an
35:10
Easter ceasefire, and then you hear
35:12
from those on the ground that
35:14
the ceasefire has been breached hundreds
35:16
of times. Zelensky himself
35:18
has said that. Or
35:20
whether we saw the collapse of
35:22
the ceasefire in Gaza and
35:24
the devastation that has continued there.
35:27
Even at the time, people describe
35:29
that particular ceasefire as fragile,
35:31
as a deal that would be
35:33
difficult to hold. And
35:35
he has struggled to
35:37
resurrect that deal. So what
35:39
we have seen now
35:42
is this administration trying to
35:44
do things on speed.
35:46
They are basically trying to
35:48
handle multiple tasks at
35:50
once, and it all feels
35:52
slightly incomplete and confusing.
35:54
It's unclear if any of
35:56
these deals are going
35:58
to get off the ground.
36:00
This particular deal with
36:03
the Iranians, I mean, you
36:05
remember famously that, you
36:07
know, the summit that Donald
36:09
Trump had with the North Korean
36:11
leader, Kim Jong -un, where he
36:13
went and he tried to
36:15
deal. Of course, and those North
36:17
Korea watchers were saying this
36:19
is just a photo op for
36:22
Kim Jong -un and it's going
36:24
to get nowhere. And
36:26
actually, I think the difference between that
36:28
and the Iran deal is the
36:30
North Koreans weren't concerned that anyone was
36:32
going to come and smash them. You
36:35
know, they were doing it for
36:37
a photo op that he wanted
36:39
to meet Donald Trump. I think
36:41
the Iranians know that there is
36:43
a lot more at stake here.
36:45
And that's why potentially we will
36:47
see concessions made from both sides
36:50
and a potential deal could be
36:52
signed between the Trump administration and
36:54
the Iranians. And that's exactly what
36:56
I was saying earlier, that neither
36:58
of us were born yesterday. There
37:01
is talk. There is movement. There's
37:03
excitement here. The government says that
37:05
it wants this deal and is
37:07
trying to show that it wants
37:09
this deal, opening up to a
37:11
degree to American journalists, to me,
37:13
and so that we can have
37:16
these kind of conversations, that I
37:18
can talk to people on the
37:20
streets. Again, unfettered
37:22
access, relatively speaking, for
37:24
Iran. I'm there
37:26
more I have more control. There's more
37:28
controls on that I felt in in
37:30
other countries than I'm feeling here I
37:32
was out the other day with our
37:34
camera. We were just walking around just
37:36
stopping people on the street putting our
37:38
tripod down Police walked by us didn't
37:40
even ask for our papers That's that's
37:42
that's shocking it for a place like
37:44
Iran I've been here in the past
37:46
soon as you put your sticks down
37:48
sticks of tripod for people who don't
37:50
know the journalistic terms as soon as
37:52
you put your sticks down The
37:55
police came and sometimes would take
37:57
you back to the police station.
37:59
I filmed in Cairo. Cairo is
38:01
harder to work than I'm finding
38:03
it to work here. When you
38:05
try and film on the streets
38:07
in Cairo, within five minutes, sometimes
38:09
less than that, the authorities are
38:11
all over you and they want
38:13
to know who you are and
38:15
there's questions and it's obstructionist. I
38:17
was talking to people on the
38:19
streets who were openly telling me
38:21
that they've had enough. Not
38:23
just of the government, but
38:26
of the entire Islamic system openly
38:28
saying that including women with
38:30
their headscarves off That's Extraordinary and
38:32
that's a I would say
38:34
for Iran quite a quite a
38:36
bold step. So they're trying
38:38
to show They want to they
38:40
want to do this deal
38:42
Whether they have no choice whether
38:44
it's real. They're doing it
38:47
the people want it, but is
38:49
it gonna fail? like the
38:51
Gaza deal fail, is it going
38:53
to fail like so far
38:55
the Ukraine talks have failed? I
38:57
don't know. The Iranians
38:59
don't know. That's the big
39:01
question. But I can tell you
39:03
this moment, there is that
39:06
window, there is that hope, and
39:08
there is that momentum from
39:10
both the state and the people
39:12
here who want to give
39:14
this a shot. And if it
39:16
does fail and suddenly there's
39:18
military action against Iran, by
39:21
Israel and there was that New York
39:23
Times report a couple of weeks ago
39:25
that said they were going to bomb,
39:27
you know, in May. And
39:29
that Trump said, let's try diplomacy
39:31
first. We'll keep military option on the
39:34
table, but let's not let's not
39:36
do that yet. So if in a
39:38
couple of months that military option
39:40
comes back and there's a conflict, I'll
39:42
look back and I will remember
39:44
the conversation we were having right now
39:47
and remember that window was open.
39:49
It was open and it was really
39:51
open for a little bit and
39:53
there really is a bit of of
39:55
momentum leading in the direction of
39:57
of trying to to engage Maybe it's
40:00
because they have a new president
40:02
Maybe because it's the women who went
40:04
out into the streets and said
40:06
they're not taking this anymore and the
40:08
police lost the the will to
40:10
to enforce a certain of these social
40:13
laws Whatever, maybe it's the economic
40:15
crisis. Whatever the reason is The currency
40:17
Going has gone up since I've
40:19
been here the the toman the Iranian
40:21
currency is gaining value because people
40:23
are encouraged by The the prospect that
40:25
there's gonna be a deal the
40:28
Iranian currency day by day since I've
40:30
been here for the last week
40:32
has gone up And that's quite significant.
40:34
It's a it's a sign of
40:36
people's confidence and I was at the
40:38
I was out last night walking
40:41
around and It was a great scene.
40:43
There were a bunch of men
40:45
and they all had their phones out
40:47
and they were looking at the
40:49
international currency rates and they were trading
40:51
gold and they were trading the
40:54
local currency and they were going back
40:56
and forth and haggling. It was
40:58
fun to watch because it was very
41:00
old fashioned of people kind of
41:02
screaming at each other and I've got
41:04
this and I've got that and
41:07
I've got this manage gold and I've
41:09
got this much currency and they
41:11
were going And the
41:13
market is heating up because
41:15
there's some optimism. Incredible.
41:18
Well, Richard, then I need to
41:20
ask you, what is your prediction
41:22
of things? I mean, you sound,
41:25
as you say, we're not
41:27
naive. We've seen these things
41:29
played out before, but you
41:31
sound cautiously optimistic. And I'm
41:33
curious to know what your
41:35
prediction is going forward and
41:37
how are things likely to
41:39
look? I
41:42
hate to be a pessimist.
41:44
I hate to be a
41:47
pessimist. But I was just
41:49
reading some old quotes from
41:51
the former Israeli prime minister,
41:53
Naftali Bennett. And
41:56
he was saying they've
41:58
never had an
42:00
opportunity like this to
42:02
strike Iran because
42:04
they have the cause,
42:06
they believe, which
42:08
was October 7th. And
42:10
they have the
42:12
means. because Iran's weapons,
42:14
external weapons, Hamas,
42:16
Hezbollah, even the Houthis are
42:18
getting weakened, they're getting attacked.
42:20
They were sort of the last
42:22
of the proxies still standing. So
42:25
Iran has never been
42:27
this vulnerable before. So
42:30
I don't, I think
42:32
there's still a decent
42:34
chance that this goes
42:36
military because there
42:39
just because there's goodwill and just
42:41
because you want something to happen.
42:44
There are plenty of people
42:46
who don't want this
42:48
to happen. There are plenty
42:50
of people who would
42:52
see this moment and see
42:54
this as a great
42:56
opportunity to try and destroy
42:58
Iran's some of Iran's
43:00
nuclear capacity. So I'm going
43:02
to do a low
43:04
prediction. I would say
43:06
it's it's still probably 50 -50
43:08
that you're gonna get a deal or you're
43:10
gonna get some sort of military action. But
43:13
if these talks break
43:15
down, there are plenty
43:18
of people in Washington
43:20
who would really like
43:22
to have a military
43:24
campaign against Iran and
43:26
see that this is
43:28
an opportunity that might
43:31
be too tempting for
43:33
them to skip. Well,
43:35
I guess for me, Richard, as
43:38
we've been discussing, I'm going
43:40
to be watching very closely the
43:42
talks with Iran. There are
43:44
more sort of meetings that are
43:46
taking place, bilaterals that are
43:48
taking place this week. And
43:50
of course, the situation in Ukraine
43:52
and Russia to see how that
43:54
unfolds, Vladimir Putin has now sort
43:56
of said, you know, has hinted
43:58
at the fact that he might want
44:00
to meet with the Ukrainians. The
44:02
last time they met, of course,
44:04
was in 2022. And those
44:06
talks fell apart. The two leaders didn't,
44:08
but they had teams that were meeting.
44:11
And of course, as we
44:13
march towards 100 days of
44:16
the Trump administration, Trump 2 .0,
44:18
I'm curious to know who is
44:21
going to remain in the court
44:23
of Trump and who leaves, whether
44:25
the Pete Hegseth is ousted, because
44:27
of course there's been more
44:29
revelations around Signalgate and that
44:31
he shared contents of that
44:33
with family and friends, and
44:36
that's landed him in hot water.
44:39
And of course, Elon Musk, who
44:41
we know that he's going to
44:43
be leaving this administration very soon.
44:45
So, you know, no surprises really
44:47
in terms of the shifts and
44:49
changes. It's taken almost three months
44:51
now. We saw the chaos in
44:53
the first Trump administration where people were
44:55
being hired and fired almost every other
44:57
week. So what
44:59
made this administration... different
45:02
from the first was the
45:04
fact that they seemed
45:06
from the outset more organized,
45:08
more focused, less kind
45:10
of leaks that we were
45:12
seeing, you know, fewer
45:14
people who were working against
45:16
the plans of the
45:18
president. And yet we are
45:20
starting to see cracks because of
45:22
the level of chaos and confusion and
45:24
the fact that things remain incomplete.
45:27
So that's what I will be focusing
45:29
on in the next week or
45:31
so. And Yalta, before we go, there's
45:33
one thing. Because if you
45:35
notice on this prediction, I was
45:37
like, well, let me, 55%, it
45:39
breaks down, 45%, it works. And
45:41
that if it breaks down, it
45:43
breaks down badly, right? Which
45:45
is, that's not a great prediction. That's still
45:47
a, it can go either way. It's kind
45:50
of a, I don't to
45:52
say cowardly, but it's not
45:54
a very decisive prediction because
45:56
it's really still fluid. And
45:58
one of the reasons that
46:00
we haven't talked about that
46:02
is very interesting is the
46:04
role of Saudi Arabia. The
46:07
Saudi Arabian Defense Minister was just
46:09
here, was just in Iran, and
46:11
is backing this deal. And
46:14
that's very different. The
46:16
Saudis and generally all the Gulf
46:18
countries didn't want this deal
46:20
to happen. Under Obama they didn't
46:22
like the deal. They didn't
46:25
want Iran breaking out of its
46:27
box. They wanted to destroy
46:29
This country and keep it as
46:31
weak as possible because of
46:33
this ancient Persian Arab rivalry because
46:35
of oil competition, you know
46:38
Who controls the the the Gulf?
46:40
Is it the Arabian Gulf
46:42
or is it the Persian Gulf?
46:44
This there's an old old
46:46
animosity here this time the Saudis
46:48
seem to be supporting this
46:51
process And there's still talk
46:53
rumors in the background, but it
46:55
was rumors circulating in Tehran when
46:57
the defense minister, who is the
46:59
brother of Mohammed bin Salman, was
47:02
here. The talk was, maybe
47:05
he's here because he's
47:07
trying to organize a
47:09
final peace summit in
47:11
Saudi Arabia where President
47:13
Trump goes and signs
47:15
this deal. So
47:17
the fact that the Saudis were here
47:20
and the fact that the Saudis
47:22
are into it and that the Saudis
47:24
are playing such a central role
47:26
in a lot of these negotiations, that's
47:29
an encouraging
47:31
sign. And so I
47:33
would say something to watch
47:35
would be watch Saudis position
47:37
vis -a -vis Iran and what
47:39
Saudi Arabia has to say
47:41
about the negotiations because I
47:43
think it's different and significant.
47:45
Yeah, absolutely. As you say,
47:47
different and significant. Richard,
47:49
really good to speak to you
47:52
again this week and this
47:54
time from Tehran. And I'm looking
47:56
forward to seeing you very
47:58
soon. And thank you to our
48:00
listeners for listening. Thank you
48:02
all of our listeners. It's great
48:05
to connect with you, great
48:07
to talk to people every week.
48:09
Sorry we missed Easter. We'll
48:11
be back and keep
48:14
it going. Please send
48:16
us questions at theworldatsky
48:18
.uk and follow us
48:20
wherever you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More