Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler  | Mind Meld 428

Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler | Mind Meld 428

Released Tuesday, 8th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler  | Mind Meld 428

Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler | Mind Meld 428

Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler  | Mind Meld 428

Entity Encounters, UFOs, Psionics, Psychic Spies and Remote Viewing the Ark | Hakim Isler | Mind Meld 428

Tuesday, 8th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

one of my mentors Bill Ray

0:02

was one of the remote viewers

0:04

too and actually helped run the

0:06

program for a little while as

0:08

well. This guy said that he

0:10

had several encounters where he bumped

0:12

into different types of entities and

0:14

one he believes that the entity

0:16

was an angel that was guarding

0:18

the arc because that's what he

0:20

found out later he was supposed

0:22

to be looking into. There are

0:24

people who have some sort of

0:26

connection with these UAPs and and

0:28

when they put their mind in a

0:30

certain space, these UAPs come that

0:33

either see what's up or, you

0:35

know, come because they called them.

0:37

So this idea of cyanics and

0:39

using individuals to communicate and connect

0:41

with these things have been around

0:43

and it seems like, you know,

0:45

that's just like the new hot

0:47

term again. Welcome back to the

0:49

transmission, my friends. If you've been

0:51

watching the channel as of late,

0:53

you likely know, we've been dipping

0:56

into the wonderful, highly weird.

0:58

but seemingly very real history

1:00

of the U.S. military and

1:02

intelligence agencies' interest in sci

1:04

phenomena. And interest in is

1:06

too light of a phrase,

1:08

extensive experimentation with remote viewing

1:10

precognition and a number of

1:12

other flavors of ESP. And

1:15

as juicy and as fantastical

1:17

as all of that, Laura

1:19

is my friends, it is

1:21

easy to forget that the

1:23

people involved in those programs

1:25

are real people. And many

1:27

of them are still out there

1:29

and still even teaching remote viewing techniques.

1:32

Our guest in this one, Hakim Isler,

1:34

is acutely aware of this fact as

1:36

he has studied with not one of

1:38

them but multiple, including the great Joe

1:41

McMonegal who we've mentioned a number of

1:43

times on the channel at this point.

1:45

But speaking of lore, that is far

1:47

from all of the pertinent lore

1:49

when it comes to hakim isler.

1:52

He's got a stunning

1:54

selection of novelty-soaked bullet

1:56

points on his bio. To let just

1:58

a few rip hot is a former

2:00

Special Ops soldier in the U.S. Army.

2:03

Specifically, he was trained in Cyops. So

2:05

this is somebody who really knows how

2:07

to spot disinformation and Cyops at an

2:10

expert level. He's also a survivalist, and

2:12

he's really just a seeker. I mean,

2:14

he made it just abundantly clear in

2:17

this conversation that he is really committed

2:19

to understanding his consciousness, the nature of

2:21

consciousness in general, and what it's capable

2:24

of. He's also spearheading just a really

2:26

intriguing event called Cy Games, the sort

2:28

of elevator pitch is that it's the

2:31

psychic Olympics. But more specifically, it's a

2:33

tournament that aims to really shine a

2:35

light on and push the boundaries of

2:37

Cy Phenomena, including things like remote viewing,

2:40

Psychokinesis, and other ESP capacities. I'm actually

2:42

going to do my best to attend

2:44

because I really want to see this

2:47

in person for myself. For more info

2:49

on that, go to PSI Games International.com.

2:51

a couple of quick wonder nuggets before

2:54

we drop into this one. I had

2:56

a pretty insane synchronicity when it comes

2:58

to this whole remote viewing of the

3:01

Ark of the Covenant tale. If you

3:03

want to hear the story about that

3:05

I'm going to save it. I'm not

3:08

going to tell it now. But go

3:10

to the post script or stay tuned

3:12

for the post script of this mind

3:14

meld if you want to hear that

3:17

tale. Also, it felt appropriate in the

3:19

spirit. of this mind meld to conclude

3:21

with something of a remote viewing challenge.

3:24

If you would like to participate or

3:26

just keep track of what's going on

3:28

with that, stay tuned at the end.

3:31

As usual all the portals for hakim

3:33

isler and third eye drops are in

3:35

the description. Do stimulate that algorithm my

3:38

friends like. Be sure you are subbed.

3:40

Comment. Share if you would be so

3:42

kind. Also sub to third eye drops

3:45

wherever you listen to podcasts. We've got

3:47

hundreds of episodes many of them are

3:49

audio only with some truly brilliant humans

3:51

and I would deeply love to have

3:54

you in the Wonder Lodge over at

3:56

Patriot There's going to be some news

3:58

dropped over there. There's going to be

4:01

some news dropped over there fairly soon.

4:03

But for now, we've got a patron-only

4:05

discord server. We've got a book club.

4:08

We do zoom hangs. You can get

4:10

a array of awards depending on your

4:12

pledge level. Would love to riff with

4:15

you there. But currently, let's do so

4:17

with Haki Missler. Man, you are a

4:19

trained, a trained Cyop agent. You are

4:22

somebody who's deeply informed and interested in

4:24

the history of sigh phenomena, both in

4:26

the sort of classified intelligence agency, agency,

4:28

agency aspects, and personally, you're a trained

4:31

remote viewer, you're doing this incredible side

4:33

games thing. So there's just so much

4:35

to talk about, man. Yeah, let's do

4:38

it, man. I appreciate coming on the

4:40

show and any opportunity to be able

4:42

to share some of this knowledge is

4:45

a great opportunity. And so I thank

4:47

you for that. For sure. Yeah, just

4:49

fresh on my mind because we briefly

4:52

each brought up Monroe at the beginning

4:54

before we were recording. And I remember

4:56

hearing you say that you actually did

4:59

Joe McMonegle's remote viewing training, right? Yes.

5:01

Yeah, I want to hear more about

5:03

that. Yeah. That was fun. It was

5:05

really fun. You know, it was a

5:08

bigger class than what I'm used to.

5:10

So when I first started remote viewing,

5:12

I started with a guy named Paul

5:15

Smith. And Paul Smith was also in

5:17

a remote viewing program. And he keeps

5:19

his class as small on purpose because

5:22

there's a lot of information. So he

5:24

runs it like, you know, you're going

5:26

to a military school to learn this.

5:29

And he learns it very much like

5:31

the way he was taught by English

5:33

swan. you come in there you have

5:36

a bunch of work that you have

5:38

to do and read and you know

5:40

you have to write essays and do

5:43

all this stuff then you like learn

5:45

about remote viewing and then you actually

5:47

do some remote viewings and then you

5:49

have like a crap ton of homework

5:52

when you get home so you got

5:54

to go back to your hotel and

5:56

you got like about two hours worth

5:59

of homework. And then the next morning

6:01

you have to turn it in and

6:03

then go through that. So that was

6:06

like my experience, right? And then I

6:08

go to the Monroe and I go

6:10

to Joe McMone School's class and it

6:13

was a lot more laid back. It

6:15

was a lot more people so they

6:17

had more people to deal with, they

6:20

had some assistance and their goal really

6:22

was to have you understand that you

6:24

are capable of remote viewing. Whereas Paul's

6:26

goal was really to get you. to

6:29

be, it was like an intensive, like

6:31

a master class, like at the end

6:33

of this, you're going to really understand

6:36

these first few stages of what we

6:38

call CRV. And so that was the

6:40

difference between the dynamics, but it was

6:43

just really cool to know that what's

6:45

there. I also find that it's very

6:47

important being in the presence of somebody

6:50

like Joe McMonico and Paul Smith, because

6:52

you know this kind of there's some

6:54

sort of resonance there where their energy

6:57

energy of people who've done those things

6:59

can if you spend enough time around

7:01

them can kind of raise your vibration

7:03

to that level in that particular space.

7:06

Hence why we have like basketball camps

7:08

and baseball camps and you know and

7:10

you know these really high level schools

7:13

where it has the greatest the greatest

7:15

minds or and people want to

7:17

get there because being around those

7:19

individuals really helps. you evolve a

7:22

lot different. So that was really

7:24

great for me. Yeah, yeah. And

7:26

for people that don't know, you

7:28

know, you mentioned CRV, Ingo Swan,

7:30

let's get into the sort of,

7:33

I guess, nerdy history of this

7:35

to some degree, because I've been

7:37

talking about it on the channel

7:39

in some capacity. I want to

7:42

keep talking about it, because I

7:44

think it is this period of

7:46

American history that has the most

7:48

to teach us about the depth

7:50

of wisdom. we already have like

7:53

in archives in terms of sigh

7:55

phenomena and what the human mind

7:57

and human consciousness seems to be

7:59

capable of you know great granted,

8:02

you know, depending who you ask,

8:04

this is still controversial, but it

8:06

doesn't seem like it's controversial to

8:08

the intelligence agencies that were running,

8:10

you know, the DIA, the CIA.

8:13

My God, man, like the volume

8:15

of stuff, even that's just been

8:17

declassified, let alone what we don't

8:19

know about, really seems to indicate

8:22

that not only is there something

8:24

to this. but they used it

8:26

to great effect over the course

8:28

of decades. And this guy, you

8:30

mentioned, Ingo Swan, he's part of

8:33

this original cohort of remote viewers,

8:35

like again, like these psychic spies

8:37

that were able to do incredible

8:39

things in remote viewing. He seems

8:41

like Ingo Swan was capable of

8:44

doing a lot more than just

8:46

remote viewing. Tell me, tell me

8:48

more about. Paul Smith,

8:50

is that his name? Yeah, Paul Smith.

8:53

Yeah, and how did he come into

8:55

contact with Ingo Swan? Oh, so yeah,

8:57

so I want to backtrack too, and

9:00

I want to answer something about Ingo

9:02

Swan. Ingo Swan, you know, when they

9:04

were trying to figure out remote viewing

9:07

and how it worked and come up

9:09

with some sort of protocol, they would

9:11

like have Ingo do stuff consistently the

9:14

same way, and even though he proved

9:16

that he could do it. An ego

9:18

would just come out and be like,

9:21

look, I'm not a one trick pony.

9:23

If this is, if you just want

9:25

me to sit here and look in

9:28

a box, that's boring. Tell me to

9:30

go find somebody somewhere. You know, like

9:32

give me a challenge. And that's really

9:35

unique if you think about it. A

9:37

lot of us, especially in our modern

9:39

day and age, is like, we're just...

9:42

you know if we know something and

9:44

people are praising us for it or

9:46

giving us an opportunity to really explore

9:49

it we're like okay well this is

9:51

the thing I know this is the

9:53

thing I'm comfortable with I'm not really

9:56

sure about going down that other way

9:58

because then I might make a mistake

10:00

and people might you know talk bad

10:03

about me but no he was just

10:05

the opposite he was like if I'm

10:07

done playing games with this like being

10:10

in this room looking in this box

10:12

like I want to go explore the

10:14

galaxy in the world you know like

10:17

that's like I find that really amazing

10:19

and that's why his name is still

10:21

on our lips to this day if

10:24

we look at any field the people

10:26

whose names tend to be on our

10:28

lips and on our minds even though

10:31

hundreds of years or you know whatever

10:33

time span that tend to be reoccurring

10:35

names are the people who really were

10:38

like that, who really pushed the envelope,

10:40

who were like, I'm not comfortable with

10:42

just being comfortable. I want to go

10:45

beyond, right? And so I just wanted

10:47

to highlight that just to pay homage

10:49

to Ingo and the amazing work he

10:52

did by pushing himself, which gave us

10:54

a lot more understanding of what we

10:56

call now controlled remote viewing. Have you,

10:59

sorry to cut you off. Have you

11:01

read any of his books? Yeah, I

11:03

have read some of Engel's books, one

11:06

in which was instrumental in helping me

11:08

move towards creating the side games. Oh,

11:10

cool, cool. And so he's got like

11:13

psychic sexuality and he's got penetration and

11:15

he's got like... Which are two different

11:17

things. Yeah, two totally different things. He's

11:20

got like... The Secrets of Power, One

11:22

and Two, so those two actually were

11:24

helping me with this, kept inspiring this

11:27

thought about side games over and over

11:29

again. And so, yeah, so I have

11:31

read quite a few of his books

11:34

and I have some that I still

11:36

need to read that I haven't. Yeah,

11:38

I haven't actually read any of his

11:41

stuff. I would like to read more.

11:43

Like, I just told you I read

11:45

this book phenomena and I'm just... obsessed

11:48

with it. And I know a lot

11:50

of the core, you know, cast of

11:52

characters in this book all have their

11:55

own work that they did over the

11:57

course of decades. Many of them have

11:59

their own books, you know, Ingo Swan.

12:02

Joe McMonegal, but oh yeah, like hell

12:04

put off and a lot of those,

12:06

the scientists involved too I guess, have

12:09

a whole body of work and need

12:11

to look deeper into. But so anyway,

12:13

Paul Smith, is he, his name sounds

12:16

familiar, was he involved in the. the

12:18

military remote viewing? Yeah, so Paul Smith

12:20

was one of the military remote viewers.

12:23

He got actually recruited invited in by

12:25

Tom McNair. Tom McNair went on to

12:27

be, he got out pretty early on,

12:30

he helped build it, but then got

12:32

out pretty early on and he went

12:34

on to become stay friends with Ingo

12:37

and be one of Ingo's. best students,

12:39

even though he was no longer like

12:41

doing it for the military, Tom McNair

12:44

was. Paul Smith, staying into the military

12:46

for, I think about, staying in that

12:48

program for about 10 years or so,

12:51

seven or ten years, and he not

12:53

only learned all the way up to

12:55

stage six, but then he also helped

12:58

teach it as well. And so that's

13:00

kind of his background into it. He

13:02

was a creative mind. He was an

13:05

intelligence community. He ended up moving across

13:07

the street from Skip Atwater and Tom

13:09

McNair, and they actually approached him and

13:12

asked him if he'd be interested in

13:14

doing this thing that they couldn't really

13:16

talk about. And he said, yeah. And

13:19

then they kind of... you know, read

13:21

him in on a program and then,

13:23

you know, gave him a test and

13:26

he did well and off he went.

13:28

So, how was that? Cool. Are these

13:30

six stages you're talking about? Is this

13:33

part of, so again, people who aren't

13:35

into the history of this, there is

13:37

a now declassified document that I believe

13:40

was architected by Ingo Swan, right? That

13:42

is like the declassified sort of manual

13:44

for how you train remote viewing? Is

13:47

this where the six stages? Yeah, so

13:49

the so when you do remote viewing

13:51

controlled remote viewing you go through these

13:53

six stages and those six stages basically

13:56

well you you go through if you

13:58

learn a few you go through like

14:00

one and two and three to end

14:03

you move on and you go through

14:05

like four and five and then you

14:07

really dive into six. Now there have

14:10

been more stages that Tom McNair have

14:12

been able to move towards, but you

14:14

got two basic types of remote viewing.

14:17

You have like structured and unstructured remote

14:19

viewing, right? And so structured remote viewing

14:21

would be like the CRV which structures

14:24

everything. And part of the reason that

14:26

structure is really important is because your

14:28

brain wants to move towards the logic

14:31

side more than it wants to move,

14:33

especially as adults in American society, more

14:35

than it wants to move towards the

14:38

creative right brain, right? And so instead

14:40

of fighting that consistently, which is something

14:42

that we would do like with a

14:45

lot of really deep meditation practice, you're

14:47

not really fighting it, but you're just

14:49

kind of put it in this place

14:52

like, okay, you're great, but right now

14:54

I need to shut you down and

14:56

I need to kind of go into

14:59

this state of state and just kind

15:01

of be more relaxed and more focused.

15:03

So you're trying to do that, but

15:06

then with the structure of remote viewing

15:08

what it does or CRV control remote

15:10

viewing what is doing is this give

15:13

is keeping busy that left side of

15:15

the brain Yeah, so that your your

15:17

consciousness or the subconsciousness can start to

15:20

go out there and reach out and

15:22

get that information without a lot of

15:24

you know overlay or you know noise

15:27

we call it from the left side

15:29

of the brain and so you're given

15:31

the left side of the brain something

15:34

to do then also for the analyst's

15:36

sake for the person who's going to

15:38

be looking at your work afterwards especially

15:41

if you've got 15 people doing a

15:43

remote viewing on one thing, if we

15:45

all have a different structure on how

15:48

we write stuff down and how we

15:50

put stuff down, that becomes pretty daunting,

15:52

right? So when we were in high

15:55

school, we all learned how to put

15:57

our name and then the date and

15:59

then the place and then we write

16:02

our thing and that had to be

16:04

on one side and we learned that

16:06

method. And that helps the teacher. So

16:09

now. Teacher is able to go to

16:11

the same place over and over again

16:13

that speeds up their job when it

16:16

comes down to grading your papers But

16:18

if we had every 20 people in

16:20

a class and everyone wrote things different

16:23

Some people wrote started on the back

16:25

some people started in the middle some

16:27

people started over here they put some

16:30

people put their name some people didn't

16:32

put their name it creates chaos for

16:34

an analyst you know who's trying to

16:37

look at your work you know so

16:39

that's where the structure really finds its

16:41

power it finds its power with occupying

16:44

the left side of the brain, and

16:46

then also giving you an opportunity to

16:48

really focus on the right side of

16:51

the brain and pulling in that information.

16:53

Then it gives you a place to

16:55

really not have to think about where

16:58

that information needs to go. You already

17:00

kind of know, you know where the

17:02

information needs to go. So you don't

17:05

have one color over here and then

17:07

another color, one color on the left

17:09

side of the page, another color on

17:12

the right side of the page, and

17:14

then like some words in between, and

17:16

then another color at the bottom, which

17:19

again, is a nightmare when you're trying

17:21

to do some information. So that gives

17:23

you that and then the stages are

17:26

just broken down because instead of you

17:28

having to think about everything at once

17:30

Again you take it in you take

17:33

it in phases you have this method

17:35

of doing this that allows you to

17:37

put the information down in a very

17:40

clean and concise way and everything has

17:42

its place. It's a lot more organized

17:44

that way For us creative types like

17:47

myself, you know if you come into

17:49

my office There's books everywhere, there's papers

17:51

everywhere, you know, and it does frustrate

17:54

me sometimes if I have to find

17:56

something and I can't remember what I

17:58

did with it. You know, I'm like,

18:01

oh, yeah, and I'm like, and then

18:03

I meet people who love having everything

18:05

in files and you know, I went

18:08

to how Putoff's house not too long

18:10

ago and I had asked him, you

18:12

know, he was telling me about something

18:15

and he was like, oh. I think

18:17

I have a copy of that. And

18:19

he goes into his office and like

18:22

he's got stuff. I mean more papers

18:24

than we could ever imagine when everything's

18:26

filed. So he was like, oh, it's

18:29

right here. here, boom, boom, boom, pulls

18:31

it out and it was like, I

18:33

was like, when's the last time you

18:36

touched that document, like 15, 20 years

18:38

ago? You know, like, when he knew

18:40

exactly where it was because it was

18:43

organized, it was structured, right? And so

18:45

structure does have a place, you know,

18:47

and they have this saying, if you

18:50

can see that structure, content be damned,

18:52

all right? And that's Rob Kort. He

18:54

was a guy in the remote viewing

18:56

program, but he was talking about how

18:59

important. You know, if you have content,

19:01

that's great. But if it's everywhere, it

19:03

just becomes a cipher, like it's a

19:06

code, you know, that nobody can read,

19:08

but you. But if you have structures

19:10

to it, then it actually becomes something

19:13

that we can, that we can all

19:15

share and grow. Yeah. That's my eternal

19:17

battle, man. It's like, I am not

19:20

a type A personality. type personality. I'm

19:22

a way more like you were alluding

19:24

to a way more sort of creative

19:27

on the fly type of person. We

19:29

got to we got to stop and

19:31

zoom in on how put off though

19:34

because he to me is one of

19:36

the most interesting compelling figures that's been

19:38

involved in this since the very beginning.

19:41

So for people that don't know of

19:43

how put off he was a physicist

19:45

at SRI which was the contractor who

19:48

did a lot of this. research throughout

19:50

decades. So he helped design, you know,

19:52

analyze, did so many things having to

19:55

do with this remote viewing program, you

19:57

know, Project Stargate and all of the

19:59

other sub projects under that umbrella. Hal

20:02

put off and Russell Tard were sort

20:04

of at the core of all of

20:06

this stuff, at least the stuff that's

20:09

declassified. And then I would have to

20:11

think. That if somebody knows some crazy

20:13

shit, hell put off those some crazy

20:16

shit. I mean, Not only was he

20:18

doing that since the early 70s, he

20:20

has now, and you might know more

20:23

about this in me, but I know

20:25

that in his, at his lab in

20:27

the Austin area now, he's still a

20:30

contractor who analyzes anomalous things for the

20:32

government. Like if you go to his,

20:34

again, they talk about this in the

20:37

book phenomenon, but you know, if you

20:39

go to the website of his organization

20:41

and you go to the sort of

20:44

like headings of what they look at.

20:46

It's very mysterious and general, but it's

20:48

enough to be like, what? You know,

20:51

it's like, like an astro, astro archaeology

20:53

and like exotic propulsion and other, I

20:55

think, size stuff. And it's just like,

20:58

well, one, who are you, who are

21:00

you exactly advertising to on this? to

21:02

what does that practically mean and for

21:05

being he's deep into his 80s right

21:07

yes yeah I believe he's like 88

21:09

right now yeah seems like he's totally

21:12

with it though in the most recent

21:14

thing I saw at least yeah yeah

21:16

he's a hundred percent and a hundred

21:19

percent and that that is that's that's

21:21

kind of weird it reminds me of

21:23

the movie Highlander Oh yeah, or the

21:26

series even, whereas like, you know, over

21:28

time people started discovering his photo in

21:30

like, you know, a picture of this

21:33

guy and like all these different, you

21:35

know, he was a doctor and then

21:37

he's a lawyer and then he's got

21:40

his connect and they're like, who is

21:42

this guy? And how long has he

21:44

been around? If you read that book,

21:47

like you were saying the one that

21:49

you're reading now and that I've read

21:51

phenomenon, his name pops up like a

21:54

bunch. And even in Diane Powell Powell's

21:56

book. ESP Enigma, his name pops up

21:58

again in a bunch of different projects.

22:01

And so and then now you got

22:03

these two movies out. One is called

22:05

the program by James Fox, and now

22:08

you have the age of disclosure. Yeah,

22:10

the stuff that this guy has been

22:12

involved in and he knows, it's just

22:15

like, you can't even imagine, you know,

22:17

and so I don't even know, it's

22:19

keeping them young. It's keeping them going

22:22

because he's 88 and he's still sharp

22:24

as attacked, man. I would love to

22:26

talk to him at some point. What

22:29

were you? What was the occasion of

22:31

you hanging with him? I was just

22:33

there as a fly on the wall.

22:36

Some friends are working on a project

22:38

with him and then this was an

22:40

opportunity and I actually work with those

22:43

friends so it was there but they

22:45

had some specific stuff that they were

22:47

working with him on and I was

22:50

just kind of there I asked some

22:52

questions about his thoughts about the side

22:54

games and things of that nature. So

22:57

that would be the extent of what

22:59

I had going on there. Cool. So

23:01

as somebody who's been, you know, is

23:04

a practitioner and is actively interested in

23:06

this stuff, not just historically, but like

23:08

I said, as a practitioner, and also

23:11

someone who is in the military, when

23:13

you read phenomena and you see, you

23:15

know, okay, all of this research is

23:18

cut off in like 95 or whatever,

23:20

when some of it comes to light.

23:22

Do you buy that? You know, and

23:25

plus now we're both aware of like

23:27

the current whistleblower environment with Jake Barber

23:29

coming out, you know, his insistence that

23:32

there are these cyanic assets that have

23:34

been being used by the military. What

23:36

do you think really happened there? Do

23:39

you think it went deeper, darker? You

23:41

know they changed all the vernacular around

23:43

it. Do you think they really stopped

23:46

it and then other Agencies picked up

23:48

the mantle like what what's your theory

23:50

on that? Yeah, so that's a great

23:53

question and the reality is is that

23:55

Normally when things work really well, we

23:57

don't just stop doing exactly And so

24:00

we just look at it from that

24:02

logic side. Now people claim that, oh,

24:04

it wasn't enough, you know, but they

24:06

ran this thing for 20 years. And

24:09

even if you look at the final

24:11

nail, per se, in the coffin, when

24:13

they had Jessica Utz, who is a

24:16

statistician, and the guy who was like

24:18

the amazing Randy's right-hand man, or he

24:20

was a protégé. And they had them

24:23

both look into this. you know that

24:25

guy came back and was like yeah

24:27

I think I don't believe it but

24:30

the research was done well right and

24:32

so he still was kind of being

24:34

a skeptic even though he couldn't find

24:37

a hole in what was going on

24:39

and then Annie I mean not Annie

24:41

Jacobs Jessica Uts was like yeah statistically

24:44

this thing is real so like and

24:46

she was the you know one of

24:48

the top statisticians in the world at

24:51

the time so So but it came

24:53

over and as soon as the CIA

24:55

got it before that paper was even

24:58

they had these two individuals look into

25:00

it and before it's way I understand

25:02

it before that was even published or

25:05

before it even came to the CIA

25:07

the CIA got the program the remote

25:09

viewing program from the DIA I believe

25:12

and they shut it down. and then

25:14

the paper came out so they were

25:16

like already just ready ready to shut

25:19

it down. Okay. Now if you follow

25:21

this really well and I don't feel

25:23

any type of way anymore like you

25:26

know this this person is my friend

25:28

so I didn't want to you know

25:30

break any confidence. But there's a gentleman

25:33

named Skip Atwater, and he recently said

25:35

on a podcast or a YouTube interview

25:37

that there were five other programs. Now

25:40

I already remember that, or there were

25:42

five programs total that based on his

25:44

clearances, he knew about that other people

25:47

would not have known about, right, who

25:49

were even in the remote viewing program.

25:51

So in the Army's remote viewing program,

25:54

so he was like, there were five,

25:56

you know, so then what happened to

25:58

those five? We only know about one.

26:01

We know about the Army's program, but

26:03

we pretty of certain that the NSA

26:05

had a program and then there's other

26:08

organizations that probably had programs going on.

26:10

What I would straight to say is

26:12

what Russell Tarck said recently in one

26:15

of his interviews was that one of

26:17

the things, the common issues that they

26:19

had about remote viewing is that they

26:22

couldn't stop it. They couldn't figure out

26:24

a way to stop it. So if

26:26

they couldn't stop it and the other

26:29

governments couldn't stop it, then what you

26:31

have is that you have this kind

26:33

of wide open gap where anybody can

26:36

like just come in if they believe

26:38

in the techniques and they practice the

26:40

techniques they can go in and like

26:43

take secrets or find secret information and

26:45

you as a government who is in

26:47

the business of secret information couldn't stop

26:50

it a matter of fact I think

26:52

it was Pat Price or Ingo Swan

26:54

one of them said that the I

26:57

think yeah it was Pat Price the

26:59

more you try to hide something the

27:01

more it becomes visible and appealing in

27:04

the psychic space right interesting so now

27:06

we have all these secrets of people

27:08

with these clearances trying to hide stuff

27:11

no in the psychic space this stuff

27:13

is like exposed it's out there it's

27:15

ready to be no does that make

27:18

sense yeah oh yeah so so now

27:20

as a government or an organization what

27:22

do you think would be the only

27:25

way well okay so you're telling me

27:27

I can't physically or I can't mentally

27:29

or psychically stop people from getting all

27:32

my secrets. So, okay, well I guess

27:34

the only thing we can do is

27:36

provide some sort of misinformation campaign, like,

27:39

or create some Cyop so that I

27:41

can get these people to like not

27:43

stop doing it, stop believing that this

27:46

is really working and we've already given

27:48

them all of this data that shows

27:50

that it does work. So now we

27:53

need to come up with. contraindicated data

27:55

or data that says that it doesn't

27:57

work. So now that's what I'm, that's

28:00

what they're, I think that that would

28:02

be a logical way for it to

28:04

go is that way. So. To answer

28:07

your question, I think yeah, it still,

28:09

it makes sense that it would still

28:11

be going on somewhere in the organization.

28:14

And China and Russia spent a lot

28:16

of money and they had some very,

28:18

we know, based on data, based on

28:21

research, based on information that's come out.

28:23

They had very successful kids and adults

28:25

that could do all types of things

28:28

with psychic abilities. You

28:30

just got to ask yourself, just

28:32

put it in your shoes, just

28:34

say, hey, I'm at my, I'm

28:36

at my house, or I'm in

28:39

this field of teaching kids martial

28:41

arts, right? And I recognize that

28:43

there's this thing that works for

28:45

people when it comes down to

28:47

marketing my business. But it could

28:50

be questionable as to whether it's

28:52

a, you know, it's a good

28:54

thing to do, right? So maybe

28:56

I just not say I'm doing

28:58

it, but do it anyway. But

29:00

I don't want to be out

29:03

there. I wouldn't tell anybody that,

29:05

you know, openly, but I'm going

29:07

to do it anyway behind closed

29:09

doors because it's valuable and it's

29:11

going to help me be successful.

29:14

So I think people can relate

29:16

to it when they put themselves

29:18

in those shoes versus just looking

29:20

at this big government unless you

29:22

just don't want to believe it.

29:25

You know, everybody's threshold is different.

29:27

So some people just don't want

29:29

to believe that. And I think

29:31

the religious organizations did the same

29:33

thing. You know, oh, wait a

29:36

minute. Should we be out here

29:38

telling everybody they have these type

29:40

of abilities and powers? Because that's

29:42

going to make it really tough

29:44

to find followers and control. Now

29:47

I haven't done this research. And

29:49

so I will say that, but

29:51

I... I'm confident that it's true,

29:53

but I haven't delved into it

29:55

as deeply as I've delved into

29:58

other topics. So I could be

30:00

incorrect. So I'll just put that.

30:02

caveat on it. There's a conversation,

30:04

there's some information that's out that

30:06

says that at one point a

30:09

certain religious group that we know

30:11

actually did believe in reincarnation. But

30:13

then they started saying that themselves,

30:15

well, if people think they can

30:17

keep coming back over and over

30:20

again, then they're not going to

30:22

have the urgency to choose our...

30:24

deity or our God as the

30:26

main God and then us as

30:28

priests as a conduit for that.

30:30

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, yeah, and

30:33

a lot of people don't know

30:35

that if you go far enough

30:37

back in history, you know, let's

30:39

just call it Christianity because that's

30:41

the most obvious example of what

30:44

you're saying. Like there is no

30:46

doctrine of reincarnation in Christianity or

30:48

at least most kinds of Christianity.

30:50

But if you go far enough

30:52

back into Greek philosophy... this idea

30:55

of metam psychosis or reincarnation is

30:57

all over the place. Plato talks

30:59

about it, all the prehistoric philosophers

31:01

talk about it. So this was

31:03

a widely believed thing, not just

31:06

in the Eastern world and Eastern

31:08

spirituality, but also in Western philosophy

31:10

and esoteric traditions. So yeah, it

31:12

is suspicious how that just sort

31:14

of falls off the doctrinal map.

31:17

And before I forget, I wanted

31:19

to share that one anecdote from

31:21

phenomena just illustrate how seriously they

31:23

took the threat of remote viewing.

31:25

There's that whole episode where they're

31:28

having a meeting with some general

31:30

and you know he's worried about

31:32

remote viewers being able to see

31:34

where they're hiding the nuclear warheads.

31:36

And he gets visibly angry apparently

31:39

in this meeting and is like,

31:41

so what you're telling me. is

31:43

they can find where they are.

31:45

That's what you're telling me. Our

31:47

enemies, remote viewers can find where

31:50

they are. And they're just kind

31:52

of like, yeah, you know, we

31:54

can't, we can't guarantee that that's

31:56

not. a distinct possibility. So then

31:58

they create this whole insane underground

32:01

network of tunnels. I think they

32:03

say millions of square miles on

32:05

underground in Nevada with the express

32:07

purpose of shuffling around dummy nuclear

32:09

warheads in real nuclear warheads on

32:11

the chance that remote viewers might

32:14

be able to see where the

32:16

warheads are. They create this whole

32:18

crazy underground complex so they can

32:20

move the warheads around. It's nuts.

32:22

It's nuts the lengths that our

32:25

government has gone to and these

32:27

other governments have gone to. I

32:29

don't think most people. even if

32:31

they know this exists, I don't

32:33

think they appreciate the insane amounts

32:36

of effort that had been put

32:38

into all this stuff. It's crazy.

32:40

And it was either, so then

32:42

to follow up that story, from

32:44

what I understand, they actually created

32:47

that shell game with these assels

32:49

and then they had remote viewers

32:51

try to find them and they

32:53

did find them. And so then

32:55

that general got even more Matt

32:58

because that was his baby, you

33:00

know. And he didn't believe in

33:02

all this remote viewing business. So

33:04

he, from what I understand, was

33:06

another catalyst, another nail in the

33:09

coffin for the remote viewing program,

33:11

not because it didn't work, but

33:13

because it made him look bad

33:15

and he spent all this money.

33:17

And that was going to, that

33:20

was like his pet thing. That

33:22

was his baby. And so the

33:24

idea that these woo-w people can

33:26

come out of nowhere and then,

33:28

you know. take this really well

33:31

thought out idea with millions and

33:33

millions of dollars behind it and

33:35

just kind of shut it down

33:37

was not okay with him. And

33:39

so he was he was very

33:42

instrumental in and demonizing this kind

33:44

of program. And so, so yeah,

33:46

that guy went to great lengths

33:48

to really shut things or put

33:50

an L in that coffin for

33:52

remote view. Yeah. Yeah. And then

33:55

there's this whole other added angle

33:57

now of the of the cyanic

33:59

program. and air quotes. And side

34:01

note, I always wonder if that

34:03

word is just a sort of

34:06

agnostic word that they're using

34:08

publicly to hide whatever

34:10

the real terminology is. That's

34:13

one of the things when

34:15

you read a book like

34:17

Phenomena or you look into

34:20

any of these declassified documents.

34:22

They're always kind of subtly

34:24

changing the language or they're

34:26

inventing new words like. Man,

34:29

I'm actually drawing a blank on

34:31

some of them now. But yeah,

34:34

they're rarely just overtly

34:36

using the words, you know, psychic

34:39

or telekinesis or psychokinesis

34:41

or whatever. They're making

34:43

up terminology so that

34:46

it's more esoteric and

34:48

harder to find. So I

34:50

have to wonder, you know, what

34:52

is like there's got to be

34:54

some. language lurking underneath

34:57

cyanic. But anyway,

34:59

if we just go with this,

35:01

you know, now agnostic

35:04

publicly used term of cyanic,

35:06

this is adding a whole

35:08

new layer to this. It's not

35:10

just, you know, remote viewing

35:13

and precognition

35:15

psychokinesis. It's using

35:17

those abilities to contact

35:20

something else or summon

35:22

something else. And I would

35:24

I'm dying to know like where this

35:26

comes from like when they figured

35:29

this out how they figured it

35:31

out you know again assuming that

35:33

this is legit but yeah did

35:35

you have any inkling of this

35:38

existing before the barber stuff came

35:40

to light or was that sort

35:42

of a. revelation to you too.

35:44

Yeah that's a great question so

35:46

Sionics the term is actually an

35:49

old term it goes back to

35:51

like 1950s some people even speculate

35:53

1930s and the idea and then

35:55

it became like a Dungeons and

35:57

Dragons like gaming term and then

36:00

it kind of took back its

36:02

normal scientific or, or, or, or,

36:04

or, or, has been around, but

36:06

the idea of basically the way

36:08

it sounds is it's more in

36:10

line with what the remote viewing

36:12

program started coming up with, which

36:14

is this idea of remote influence,

36:17

right? And so people like Limb

36:19

Buchanan, who's also a part of

36:21

the remote viewing program, who back

36:23

in the day, who was also

36:25

a part of that, he... He

36:27

teaches and talks about remote influence

36:29

and this idea that you can

36:31

influence people remotely at a distance

36:33

in that book phenomenon and the

36:36

Jacobs talks about it as well.

36:38

The idea of being able to

36:40

heal people and deal with different

36:42

types of aspects of people's body

36:44

system remotely and the research that

36:46

they've done there. And so this

36:48

has kind of been a thing,

36:50

but not necessarily with extraterrestrials or

36:52

these NHIs or whatever you would

36:55

call these different beings and their

36:57

craft these UAPs. However, there has

36:59

been research and studies out there

37:01

that talk about people having these

37:03

type of connections where these beings

37:05

or these UAPs seem to be

37:07

coming back to them over and

37:09

over again and what is the

37:11

connection there? And with my friend,

37:14

a friend of mine, Chris Bledsoe,

37:16

When they started doing a lot

37:18

of research on him, they started

37:20

saying, or at least it came

37:22

out in his book, UFO of

37:24

God, that Jim Sim event, which

37:26

is a CIA guy, really high

37:28

level CIA individual, was saying that

37:30

what they know, or alluded to,

37:33

I believe, in the book, what

37:35

they know is that there are

37:37

people who have some sort of

37:39

temporal or some sort of connection

37:41

with these UAPs, and when they...

37:43

put their mind in a certain

37:45

space, these UAPs come that either

37:47

see what's up or, you know,

37:50

come because they called them or

37:52

nobody really knows what that relationship

37:54

is like is it a moth

37:56

to a flame type thing where

37:58

it just becomes interesting like what's

38:00

going on over here this guy

38:02

all of a sudden is shining

38:04

brighter than everybody else let me

38:06

go see what's going on there

38:09

so I can gather data on

38:11

how what levels these people are

38:13

able to accomplish yeah or is

38:15

it really that you're just calling

38:17

that those those beings and again

38:19

if there are multiple and also

38:21

if there are multiple different types

38:23

of beings then some of them

38:25

may be interested in things for

38:28

different reasons right and so we

38:30

don't know what that is neither

38:32

so this idea of cyanics and

38:34

using individuals to communicate and connect

38:36

with these things have been around

38:38

and it seems like, you know,

38:40

that's just like the new hot

38:42

term again because it was brought

38:44

up in this particular context with

38:47

this particular gentleman who was divulging

38:49

a lot of really interesting important

38:51

information. And so now we have

38:53

a government or ex-government official or

38:55

individual that's coming forward and saying,

38:57

yes, this is real. this is

38:59

what we were doing, and here's

39:01

a term so that can help

39:03

you guys wrap your head around

39:06

it, which I find maybe this

39:08

is, you know, what we're seeing

39:10

as a soft disclosure as all

39:12

of these terms are coming out

39:14

and giving people things that they

39:16

can hold on to now, and

39:18

it's not, it's becoming a little

39:20

bit more concrete now. Yeah, it

39:22

seems like that's what's going on

39:25

to me. If the whole thing

39:27

isn't just some massive... sigh up

39:29

for some unbelievably complex network of

39:31

reasons. I feel because there's no

39:33

one explanation that I can think

39:35

of that would justify any kind

39:37

of like really really long-term sigh

39:39

up like this. I feel like

39:41

it would have to be a

39:44

very long narrative. shifting con game

39:46

or something like that. But I'm

39:48

more warm to the idea of

39:50

what you're suggesting that this is

39:52

like a gradual slow roll disclosure.

39:54

And there are various aspects of

39:56

that disclosure that they're identifying and

39:58

they're probably like, all right, how

40:00

are we going to bring up

40:03

this idea that we're already constantly,

40:05

probably in contact with other. life

40:07

forms or archetypes or to use

40:09

Robert Monroe's term energy systems or

40:11

like whatever you want to call

40:13

them beings I don't know well

40:15

let's just let's throw this out

40:17

there let's throw out this idea

40:19

of cyanic contact with benevolent, and

40:22

that's the other thing that's really

40:24

interesting about Barber's story, is he

40:26

really pushes this idea that it

40:28

is benevolent, that no matter what

40:30

you hear, you know, scary stories

40:32

about abduction, scary stories about, you

40:34

know, things wanting to feed on

40:36

you or take you over or

40:38

experiment on you, no, that is

40:41

not what these things are. They're

40:43

of a spiritual nature, they're benevolent,

40:45

Chris Bledsoe, who you brought up,

40:47

says the same thing. But there's

40:49

a lot of people who have,

40:51

you know, who are like, okay,

40:53

well, what about all these anomalous

40:55

injuries? What about the radiation, you

40:57

know, damage that people are suffering?

41:00

What about, you know, what about

41:02

all of those stories of abduction?

41:04

What about cattle mutilate? You know,

41:06

there's so many following questions. And

41:08

of course, I don't think we

41:10

know the answers to those questions,

41:12

but yeah, it's, I have to

41:14

agree that it's probably, I think

41:17

the most parsimonious thing. if it

41:19

is real, is that it's got

41:21

to be some kind of slow

41:23

roll disclosure. Yeah, well, I would

41:25

offer this too, and let's game

41:27

this out a little bit. So

41:29

if you want to avoid catastrophic

41:31

disclosure of an entities or entity

41:33

or entities that exist out there.

41:36

Where would you have the most

41:38

success to do that? Telling people

41:40

that some of the entities and

41:42

harping on, some of the entities

41:44

being, you know, evil and mean

41:46

and ready to kill you and

41:48

do all this stuff or say

41:50

that they're good? So, like, I

41:52

would say, yeah, hey, we know

41:55

about these other ones that are

41:57

bad, but let's just talk about

41:59

the good ones because we are

42:01

trying to do this gradual disclosure.

42:03

And if we just start saying,

42:05

yeah, they're bad, they're bad, they're

42:07

bad. Then when they do unveil

42:09

themselves, I mean, that's when all

42:11

hell is going to break loose.

42:14

But if we say they're good,

42:16

they're good, and then they are

42:18

unveil themselves, and they're good, and

42:20

then we, and the people won't

42:22

freak out freak out as much.

42:24

Does that make sense? Totally. So

42:26

I would, that's what I would

42:28

say as well, because I think,

42:30

you know, what we do know,

42:33

and I don't know if we

42:35

can say, I mean, we could

42:37

always say if they exist. because

42:39

there's still all these different motives

42:41

of why people are doing that.

42:43

But I think it's pretty clear

42:45

now that they're coming out saying,

42:47

yes, they're there. You got Colonel

42:49

Carl Nell who just came out

42:52

straight out and said, hey, look,

42:54

they're here. Nonhuman intelligence has been

42:56

interacting with humanity. This interaction is

42:58

not new and it's been ongoing.

43:00

And they're unelected. people in the

43:02

government that are aware of that.

43:04

There's zero doubt. You know, they're

43:06

interacting on age of disclosure. From

43:08

what I understand, you have multiple

43:11

people from multiple different governments, high-level

43:13

individuals saying, yes, they're here. Now,

43:15

they're not going into detail from

43:17

what I understand as to why

43:19

they're here or whether they're good

43:21

or bad, and, you know, some

43:23

people have had bad encounters. I

43:25

would also offer up for balance,

43:27

one of my mentors, Bill Ray.

43:30

And Bill was one of the

43:32

remote viewers too and actually helped

43:34

run the program for a little

43:36

while as well and went on.

43:38

to have a very very very

43:40

long intelligence encounter intelligence career where

43:42

he didn't retire until he was

43:44

like in his 80s. So this

43:46

guy said that he had several

43:49

encounters where he bumped into these

43:51

different types of entities and one

43:53

he believes that the entity was.

43:55

angel or cherubim that was guarding

43:57

the arc because that's what he

43:59

found out later he was supposed

44:01

to be looking into and others

44:03

he was at the ship that

44:05

he went to it was remote

44:08

viewing the site where a bunch

44:10

of people disappeared from the ship

44:12

and he started having feelings of

44:14

these people being in panic and

44:16

they were dealing with something that

44:18

was very dark and evil so

44:20

much to the point where even

44:22

when he explains it he says

44:25

the visceral response that he gets

44:27

is just still overwhelming and unsettling,

44:29

just talking about it. And so

44:31

one of the things he left

44:33

me with was he said that

44:35

there could, he's worked with double

44:37

agents or he's worked with undercover

44:39

agents that he was running or

44:41

assets, he would call them when

44:44

he was working for these different

44:46

governmental agencies. And He's had instances

44:48

where people, he's a spy, he

44:50

knows these other people were spies

44:52

and they're working for him, he's

44:54

using them as assets, and they've

44:56

been so convincing even to him

44:58

that they were really working for

45:00

just him and giving him information

45:03

and then he finds out there

45:05

a double agent, right? He says,

45:07

so if I'm this super trained

45:09

guys. trained in all of the

45:11

techniques to spot this type of

45:13

stuff and somebody can still fool

45:15

me? How are we to think

45:17

that some entity on some other

45:19

level can't do the same thing?

45:22

Right. So I said, well, what

45:24

would you say? Would you say

45:26

people should take this and go

45:28

out there and try to explore

45:30

these entities? And he said, no,

45:32

run the other way. And I

45:34

said, And what? He's like, yeah.

45:36

He's like, yeah, they could be

45:38

good, but they could be tricking

45:41

you. And they could be using,

45:43

I mean, we could do it

45:45

on a base level. You know

45:47

Chris Ramsey. You know, the average

45:49

person is really easy to fool.

45:51

And it's our desire to say

45:53

we know better, that we are

45:55

better, that we can't be full,

45:57

that actually makes us even more

46:00

fullable, right? That was the same

46:02

tactic we use in Sa'o. Those

46:04

who know are the easiest to

46:06

go after because you wrap everything

46:08

in their knowing and then they'll

46:10

just eat it up, right? So

46:12

us on this little small base

46:14

level, we're saying we can do

46:16

that, then imagine what some entity

46:19

that knows... about the galaxy and

46:21

all this stuff about consciousness could

46:23

do to us and how they

46:25

would be able to fool us.

46:27

You know, so I think that

46:29

was a very fair assessment, not

46:31

saying that I agree with it

46:33

100% but I think that's a

46:35

very fair assessment is that yes,

46:38

you can believe what you want

46:40

and feel what you want and

46:42

say if for me it was

46:44

true, pure love and energy, but

46:46

also maybe we should stay open

46:48

to the possibility that that could

46:50

be... a trip. Yeah, man. Yeah,

46:52

that it's such a hall of

46:54

mirrors. But I think for people

46:57

like myself and I would venture

46:59

just based on what I know

47:01

about you people like you who

47:03

have this, you know, we have

47:05

this seeking disposition. You're you're a

47:07

martial artist. You're a soldier. I

47:09

grew up doing martial arts. You

47:11

know, I'm sure you're very drawn

47:13

to the like the hero's journey

47:16

motif. I am too. It's like

47:18

Just because there's fear there doesn't

47:20

like doesn't mean I don't want

47:22

to investigate it like yeah I

47:24

still I still want to go

47:26

into that like dark forest and

47:28

poke around and see what's there

47:30

and see what's real. Maybe I

47:32

don't need to go into the

47:35

deepest darkest you know cave that's

47:37

the most brimming with goblins or

47:39

anything. but I want to get

47:41

a look, I want to see

47:43

what's going on to some degree,

47:45

you know, and that's led me

47:47

down a multitude of paths of

47:49

exploring different things in my own

47:52

life and obviously it has for

47:54

you too. So I'm assuming that

47:56

you still encourage people to investigate

47:58

these qualities, these realms. I mean,

48:00

you must because you're. It's part

48:02

of your it's part of your

48:04

your living. It's your you're you're

48:06

doing Cy games you're yeah Some

48:08

of these techniques. Well, I think

48:11

you know, I think we could

48:13

hide from it and let it

48:15

you know There's there's things happening

48:17

to you and you happening to

48:19

it right and so when things

48:21

happen to you you have very

48:23

little control over how You know,

48:25

you have control over how you

48:27

respond, but you don't have a

48:30

lot of control over how it

48:32

happens to you. When you happen

48:34

to it, you not only have

48:36

control on how you respond, but

48:38

you also have a little bit

48:40

more control on how you engage.

48:42

And so I think it's fair

48:44

and I think it's a balanced

48:46

way to come at it to

48:49

say, well, okay, instead of me

48:51

hiding from this thing that is

48:53

there and could just start popping

48:55

up in my life. And then

48:57

me then have being motivated to

48:59

try to figure it out, which

49:01

means that I'm reactive and that

49:03

never really works well. It's always

49:05

really good to be proactive and

49:08

then hope for the best and

49:10

you know plan for the worst,

49:12

hope for the best, right? It's

49:14

in my opinion. And so I

49:16

always think this idea of saying

49:18

okay I'm gonna do this but

49:20

I'm gonna do this a responsible

49:22

way I'm gonna find somebody who

49:24

I feel is a good mentor

49:27

not I'm not a I'm not

49:29

a high proponent of like oh

49:31

I just need to meditate and

49:33

I'll tap in and I can

49:35

and I am the guru I've

49:37

just got to awaken the guru

49:39

within me you know like yeah

49:41

yeah I believe that there's this

49:43

ability and these powers there but

49:46

I think mentorship is just like

49:48

really important because there are elders

49:50

and they've gone through some stuff

49:52

and they've had experiences. Now that

49:54

doesn't mean that all of their

49:56

experience is going to relate to

49:58

ours, right? Because you could be

50:00

the one that breaks the mold.

50:02

I tell people that all the

50:05

time when they ask me business

50:07

advice. I say, well, look, this

50:09

didn't work for me, but I

50:11

can't say that won't work for

50:13

you because you could be the

50:15

guy that changes everything, you know,

50:17

or the girl that changes everything.

50:19

try it out. So I am

50:21

open to it. I feel that

50:24

that's one of the reasons for

50:26

the side games. The side games

50:28

is like, hey, if we have

50:30

these abilities, we need to push

50:32

them forward. We need to grow

50:34

them. And up to this point,

50:36

you know, yeah, the only person

50:38

who's really, the only place that's

50:40

put real money and research behind

50:43

this and doing it on a

50:45

real basis is these governmental agencies.

50:47

I don't know if the government

50:49

is always the has the best

50:51

interest of the people all the

50:53

time in these different organizations. So

50:55

maybe we should have a citizen

50:57

version of this as well where

50:59

we actually try to. raise up

51:02

our abilities so that we can

51:04

also engage and we can have

51:06

conversations at the table, right? Because

51:08

the government is supposed to be

51:10

for the people, but it is

51:12

supposed to be a representation for

51:14

the people, but we also want

51:16

to have the people be a

51:19

representation for the people on some

51:21

level. So the side games is

51:23

like, hey, if people are bumping

51:25

into these entities and people have

51:27

these abilities, let's put it on

51:29

the world stage where one we

51:31

can build a strong positive community

51:33

around this. We can collaborate. We

51:35

can have people who have different

51:38

experiences and different strengths collaborate with

51:40

each other to help raise up

51:42

all ships and not just my

51:44

little group in my little corner

51:46

of the world. And then we

51:48

can find mentorship. And then lastly,

51:50

we need to bring on the

51:52

bring up the next generation in

51:54

a world where they don't feel

51:57

like they have to shut down

51:59

their gifts and then they can.

52:01

can reclaim the years that they've

52:03

shut down their gifts. So if

52:05

you think about this is, and

52:07

you've probably seen this too in

52:09

the circles that you go into,

52:11

when we go to Monroe or

52:13

all these different places, the majority

52:16

of the people there are in

52:18

their 40s, 50s, coming to these

52:20

things. And when you talk to

52:22

them, well, how did you get

52:24

started? Oh, yeah, you know, when

52:26

I was a kid, I used

52:28

to be able to see things

52:30

and talk to things and I

52:32

had all these experiences. parents, society,

52:35

community said, nope, that's not something

52:37

we do and that's not real

52:39

or that's evil or whatever thing

52:41

came up. And then they shut

52:43

it down. And then at some

52:45

point they go years and years

52:47

and years and then they have,

52:49

they meet somebody or have an

52:51

experience and they say, oh yeah,

52:54

that's right. When I was a

52:56

kid, I used to do that.

52:58

Let me start now as an

53:00

adult investigating this more. What would

53:02

our society be like if people

53:04

from that age of 10, when

53:06

they had that first experience was

53:08

supported, given love, shown mentorship, given

53:10

mentorship, and now they grow up.

53:13

for 10, 20, 30 years of

53:15

just practicing and believing in this

53:17

ability, where would we be now?

53:19

Where would we be now? What

53:21

would that be like? And so

53:23

the Side Games is like, okay,

53:25

how do we get that more

53:27

of that? How do we make

53:29

a place that's fun for these

53:32

children to go to? part of

53:34

that is meeting them where they

53:36

at. They like to play, they

53:38

like fun. So let's meet them

53:40

where they have fun and let's

53:42

just grow from there, you know,

53:44

and let's do that for adults

53:46

too. And now we can also

53:48

inspire each other, we can push

53:51

each other to new levels. Our

53:53

friend Chris, another friend of ours,

53:55

this guy named Nelson, believes in

53:57

this idea of, you know, he's

53:59

a memory champion, a six-time world

54:01

memory champion or a US memory

54:03

champion. And he talks about how

54:05

when the memory, there was a

54:07

time that science thought that you

54:10

can only hold about nine things,

54:12

six to nine things in your

54:14

head. that one time right and

54:16

that was it that was like

54:18

the cap but now they're up

54:20

to like 500 the champion can

54:22

hold 500 different numbers or items

54:24

in their head and recite them

54:27

in order to you at a

54:29

time right and so that happened

54:31

through competition you know he said

54:33

the same with cards they used

54:35

to say you have five minutes

54:37

to remember 12 Playing cards in

54:39

an order that we choose and

54:41

that was the that was the

54:43

top nobody could beat that he

54:46

said he said then it turned

54:48

into 12 seconds to memorize the

54:50

full deck Wow and just recently

54:52

last year he said that a

54:54

kid a young kid Was able

54:56

to memorize a full deck in

54:58

any order that you put it

55:00

in seven seconds One, two, three,

55:02

four, five, six, seven. The kids

55:05

has already memorized the whole decade.

55:07

Probably, I don't even know how

55:09

they do it, you know, but

55:11

I was just like, that's insane.

55:13

You know, but how did that

55:15

happen? That happened through competition, people

55:17

getting together and, you know, pushing

55:19

each other. So, or a new

55:21

word I heard recently co-op. co-opetition.

55:24

Yeah, it's like cooperation, competition together,

55:26

where we're still working for the

55:28

same goal, but we're pushing each

55:30

other through this inspirational way. So

55:32

that's really what the side games

55:34

is, and that's what we're all

55:36

about, is like, hey, how do

55:38

we do, how do we get

55:40

people to spend more time and

55:43

consciousness? How do we make room

55:45

for youth to kind of grow

55:47

up with this? How do we

55:49

get more people to collaborate and

55:51

come together and build a community

55:53

around this that supports one another?

55:55

take it out of the lab

55:57

where you know labs is great

55:59

a lab is great but you

56:02

know that it's only but so

56:04

far you can get there and

56:06

then you what you're gonna publish

56:08

another paper that nobody's going to

56:10

read. Right. And that people who

56:12

are skeptical are going to say,

56:14

like, no, no, this is, this

56:16

is, this is nonsense. Yeah, I,

56:18

I mean, obviously I respect the

56:21

scientific method and think it's unbelievably

56:23

important and it has rewarded us

56:25

in so many ways. I don't

56:27

want to straw man it. But

56:29

we got to remember, the scientific

56:31

method is something that. human beings

56:33

invented to try to get repeatable

56:35

results and ascertain things about reality.

56:37

It doesn't in and of itself

56:40

determine what is real, right? And

56:42

there's so many parts of life

56:44

that are not captureable, you know,

56:46

by the scientific method. Any kind

56:48

of qualitative, you know, to use

56:50

the philosophy of consciousness term, like

56:52

qualia-based experience, none of that can

56:54

really be captured by the scientific.

56:56

method and I think these abilities

56:59

are so endemicly tied up in

57:01

those qualitative kinds of knowing that

57:03

how you even try to capture

57:05

that just in statistics is not

57:07

it's not satisfactory you know and

57:09

and going back to a lot

57:11

of the justification that they used

57:13

to shut these programs down a

57:15

lot of it had to do

57:18

with like Well, yeah,

57:20

this might be impressive, but it's

57:22

not repeatable. Like this, this one

57:24

occasion, you know, maybe that really

57:26

yielded results, but it's not, you

57:28

can't like put, put it in

57:30

a lab and repeat it. And

57:32

it's like, yeah, well, you don't

57:34

need to do that to prove

57:36

that there's something there. Like, if

57:38

you have a crazy experience or

57:40

I have a crazy experience, I

57:43

know that that happened. this positive

57:45

environment this this friendly environment where

57:47

we're all hanging out and writhing

57:49

and exploring and like seeing what's

57:51

possible that's super exciting man it's

57:53

almost crazy to me that that

57:55

hasn't happened before, that there hasn't

57:57

been something like this, or maybe

57:59

like back in the day and

58:01

like the like Ecelyn's heyday or

58:03

something, maybe they did things like

58:05

this, but yeah, I've never heard

58:07

of anything. Yeah, I know the

58:10

right just to give credit were

58:12

credit is due that went and

58:14

I found this out after I've

58:16

already embarked on the side games.

58:18

I started talking to John Cruz

58:20

who runs the Ryan Research Center.

58:22

Oh, he was saying, Oh, yeah,

58:24

we do we do something like

58:26

a small thing called the side

58:28

games and it's only like 20

58:30

of us we get together and

58:32

we'll play this thing. So it

58:34

actually existed out there and I

58:37

didn't even know that, but then

58:39

it wasn't on this scale. And

58:41

this is really, it's called Side

58:43

Games International because I'm trying to

58:45

bring people from all over the

58:47

world together under this banner, under

58:49

us being able to really explore

58:51

this and build a multinational community.

58:53

where people can train and feel

58:55

comfortable exploring these different realms and

58:57

these different avenues. So that's that's

58:59

really the key right there. And

59:01

so hopefully we get people that

59:04

support it and that want to

59:06

try and you know sometimes people

59:08

have a bad idea or feeling

59:10

about competition. They say, oh, it's

59:12

negative. And I think that's really

59:14

just our culture. Our culture, you

59:16

know, we go to the kids

59:18

football game and we see dad

59:20

over on the sideline cursing at

59:22

everybody and like, you know, telling

59:24

us kids better like score 20

59:26

touchdowns for that day. Versus, you

59:28

know, like, hey, it's all right,

59:31

you know, just have fun. play

59:33

with your friends, you know, do

59:35

the best that you can and

59:37

so on and so forth. And

59:39

this way, if we build this

59:41

community in love and respect and

59:43

inspiration and collaboration, I think that's

59:45

going to be a different environment.

59:47

So I've been offering this on

59:49

every channel that I've talked to.

59:51

I say, hey, look, if you

59:53

feel like competition is not the

59:55

way to go and it should

59:58

be done in love, then get

1:00:00

off your ass and bring the

1:00:02

love to the Yeah, yeah, that's

1:00:04

a good way to do it.

1:00:06

You know, like, don't, don't just

1:00:08

talk, be a keyboard warrior, like,

1:00:10

recognize what we're trying to do

1:00:12

is, again, community, collaboration, inspiration, and

1:00:14

then if you can stand behind

1:00:16

those, then come out and support

1:00:18

and be the change you want

1:00:20

to see, be the person that

1:00:22

helps add that extra light to

1:00:25

the room. And I made some

1:00:27

friends laugh recently. I said, like,

1:00:29

be a care bear because care,

1:00:31

you know, let's join hands in

1:00:33

the room and like let that

1:00:35

heart shine, you know, so don't

1:00:37

just talk about it from a

1:00:39

distance, come and help us out,

1:00:41

come and help us make a

1:00:43

new world. Because it's really funny,

1:00:45

if you look at all the

1:00:47

things that are happening right now,

1:00:49

this is, we are setting the

1:00:52

world up to be not, not

1:00:54

worldly. But cosmically, like we, we're

1:00:56

now talking about UAPs, we're now

1:00:58

talking about NHIs, well, we're now

1:01:00

talking about flying to the moon

1:01:02

and building things on the moon

1:01:04

and that's becoming like more of

1:01:06

a reality or Mars, that's becoming

1:01:08

more of a reality. And then

1:01:10

it's like, well, how do you

1:01:12

make that happen? Well, we gotta

1:01:14

have currency, we can't just fly

1:01:16

dollars all around the place. Yeah.

1:01:19

Oh, okay, well. What about a

1:01:21

digital currency? Just like we saw

1:01:23

in all these like old movies,

1:01:25

we do space fairing, you know,

1:01:27

communities, or they have like a,

1:01:29

you know, this type of money

1:01:31

that you can use anywhere in

1:01:33

any bar in the galaxy, you

1:01:35

know? And so it's like, whoa,

1:01:37

you know, it's kind of weird,

1:01:39

like you start, it's like we're

1:01:41

seeing the beginning of Star Wars

1:01:44

or Star Trek, you know, or

1:01:46

some of these movies, like how

1:01:48

we go from just being a

1:01:50

one planet. culture to multi-planet, multi-dimensional

1:01:52

culture. And what it takes for

1:01:54

that to happen, it takes for

1:01:56

our consciousness to raise, it takes

1:01:58

for our way of doing trade

1:02:00

and monetization to start changing. It

1:02:02

talks about... our world view expanding

1:02:04

beyond just our planet, like all

1:02:06

that stuff is happening right now.

1:02:08

Totally, man. Yeah, and if there

1:02:11

is anything to all of this

1:02:13

size stuff, which at this point

1:02:15

is so hard for me to

1:02:17

deny, we're kind of unveiling the

1:02:19

force too. We're sort of like,

1:02:21

it's indistinguishable from this notion of

1:02:23

the force, this like mysterious interconnected

1:02:25

thing that we're all tapped into

1:02:27

and some people have to be

1:02:29

able to tap into. You can

1:02:31

train yourself to tap into it

1:02:33

to some degree. It's super exciting.

1:02:35

I know you have very limited

1:02:38

time, but just for a fun

1:02:40

way to wrap this. Do you

1:02:42

have any anecdotes that stand out

1:02:44

to you as the most just

1:02:46

mind-blowing thing that you've experienced or

1:02:48

that you've seen firsthand with any

1:02:50

of the exploration that you've done?

1:02:52

Yeah. I went to Monroe, this

1:02:54

is probably one of the biggest,

1:02:56

you know, when I was a

1:02:58

kid I had several psychic moments,

1:03:00

pre-cognitive moments where I, one time

1:03:02

I dreamt a lotto, I told

1:03:05

my mom about it, she played

1:03:07

it locally but not nationally, it

1:03:09

came, the numbers came out nationally,

1:03:11

we would have been bazillionaires, we

1:03:13

probably wouldn't know each other because

1:03:15

I'd be on the beach somewhere

1:03:17

hanging out. So, um, And there

1:03:19

was several other instances that I've

1:03:21

done some really amazing things. It

1:03:23

just came up and popped up

1:03:25

in my mind. So there's that.

1:03:27

But the gateway was probably one

1:03:29

of the most concrete, very real

1:03:32

things. I had an entity come

1:03:34

to me while I was in

1:03:36

that and tell me some things.

1:03:38

And I was left there and

1:03:40

I was still trying to stay

1:03:42

objective. So I was like, maybe

1:03:44

that happened, maybe it didn't happen.

1:03:46

Well, come to follow, I end

1:03:48

up partaking in several different classes

1:03:50

after that. And there were these

1:03:52

individuals in those classes that had

1:03:54

psychic abilities or could tell you

1:03:56

things about your life and this

1:03:59

person. in one class tells me

1:04:01

the same thing that entity told

1:04:03

me, not knowing because I didn't

1:04:05

tell that story. And then I

1:04:07

met another person a few weeks

1:04:09

later who tells me the same

1:04:11

thing that entity told me. So

1:04:13

I'm not sure if I was

1:04:15

precognitive seeing what these people were

1:04:17

going to and I just tacked

1:04:19

on somewhere in my mind my

1:04:21

psyche this entity or if the

1:04:23

entity was telling me about what

1:04:26

I'm going to be in the

1:04:28

future and these people are confirming

1:04:30

that adding confirmation. Either way, that's

1:04:32

pretty mind blowing is pretty awakening.

1:04:34

It did happen. It is real.

1:04:36

So whether I'm precognating it or

1:04:38

whether it was. this actual entity.

1:04:40

It's very, it was very real.

1:04:42

And that happened after I was

1:04:44

with my, my friend Chris Bledsoe

1:04:46

for the first time and he

1:04:48

gave me an encounter with a

1:04:50

UAP and then a few days

1:04:53

later I went back and he,

1:04:55

we had, he facilitated another encounter

1:04:57

with UAP. So the thing I

1:04:59

would tell people anecdotally. is that

1:05:01

all of the systems that I

1:05:03

practice, gateway, remote viewing, mindsight, seeing

1:05:05

without your eyes, all the stuff,

1:05:07

all hinders on your intention and

1:05:09

attention. They all say the same

1:05:11

thing. Focus your intention, maintain attention

1:05:13

on that focus, right? And so

1:05:15

if I was to tell people.

1:05:17

something, I'd say really get strong

1:05:20

in those two things, right? And

1:05:22

then Joe McNacle says another one,

1:05:24

which is a third one, which

1:05:26

is expectation of outcome. Expect that

1:05:28

it's going to have the outcome

1:05:30

that you want it, right? Versus

1:05:32

expecting that it's not or kind

1:05:34

of being in the middle. Set

1:05:36

your intention. I want to communicate

1:05:38

with this or I want to

1:05:40

do this or whatever to maintain

1:05:42

your attention. and then expect that

1:05:44

it's going to be exactly the

1:05:47

way you intend it to be.

1:05:49

And then you will have probably

1:05:51

some really good results. and whatever

1:05:53

field you're dabbling in are working

1:05:55

in. Wow, wow. Man, I would

1:05:57

love to hear the story about

1:05:59

whatever you saw with Chris Belizzo,

1:06:01

but I know we're running very

1:06:03

low on time. Can you give

1:06:05

like the 30 second version? Yeah,

1:06:07

so the first time it was

1:06:09

way up in the sky and

1:06:11

it was flashing and it was

1:06:14

moving back and forth and side

1:06:16

to side and up and down

1:06:18

and it was nighttime. And it

1:06:20

was nighttime. So I was at

1:06:22

first, I was like, and I

1:06:24

had just met Chris. Is this

1:06:26

a. maybe it's a drone but

1:06:28

you know of course you can

1:06:30

hear a drone and it wasn't

1:06:32

so far up that I couldn't

1:06:34

hear it if it was a

1:06:36

drone so I was just like

1:06:39

I don't know I don't I'm

1:06:41

just not sure you know yeah

1:06:43

and so I kind of left

1:06:45

saying okay and one of the

1:06:47

things he told me was he

1:06:49

said hey look Just be positive,

1:06:51

just believe in the possibility that

1:06:53

this can happen and it'll happen.

1:06:55

But if you come in here

1:06:57

and you're like, I don't believe

1:06:59

this stuff, this guy's crazy, blah

1:07:01

blah blah, it'll never happen, it's

1:07:03

not real, then they probably not

1:07:06

going to show up. So he

1:07:08

warned me about that or gave

1:07:10

me that advice ahead of time.

1:07:12

Sure enough. The second time when

1:07:14

I was there, it actually appeared

1:07:16

in some trees ahead of me,

1:07:18

which made me feel like... It

1:07:20

definitely wasn't a, it definitely wasn't

1:07:22

a drone because, you know, drones

1:07:24

have a hard enough time flying

1:07:26

between trees during the day. So

1:07:28

at night, I felt that it

1:07:30

was, and it was this glowing

1:07:33

like orange orb. And in that

1:07:35

same time frame, off to my

1:07:37

right, another light pops up. And

1:07:39

I'm like, Chris, is that one?

1:07:41

You know, I was really excited.

1:07:43

And he said, no, that's my

1:07:45

neighbor. They have a house back

1:07:47

there. So either he was like.

1:07:49

the greatest sci opera ever, you

1:07:51

know, like, and he said all

1:07:53

of the elements to make me

1:07:55

believe, it's a big illusion, or

1:07:57

this was real. And so I

1:08:00

walked away, you know, not only

1:08:02

with his friendship and loving him

1:08:04

as a friend, but also knowing

1:08:06

that what I saw, I couldn't

1:08:08

explain, and if I was to

1:08:10

explain it, I would say it

1:08:12

was some sort of... And that

1:08:14

tells you. Now to finish off

1:08:16

that story in a really great

1:08:18

way, I'm sitting at Tom McNair's

1:08:20

house, one of the remote viewers

1:08:22

I told you about, and we're

1:08:24

discussing, Chris comes up in conversation.

1:08:27

And I'm like, he's like, oh

1:08:29

yeah, I heard about him. I

1:08:31

haven't read his book yet, but

1:08:33

I'm really curious, like, what was

1:08:35

your take? What we're talking about

1:08:37

now? So I explain these two

1:08:39

stories. And he's like, so tell

1:08:41

me more details. You know, this

1:08:43

guy is an ex-CIA operative who

1:08:45

was in the Army intelligence and

1:08:47

all this stuff. He was the

1:08:49

head of all this really high

1:08:51

level stuff in the CIA. So,

1:08:54

you know, he's all about details

1:08:56

and gathering information. And I'm like,

1:08:58

you know, Tom, I just can't

1:09:00

explain it in words. And right

1:09:02

at that exact moment, Mike, right

1:09:04

at that exact moment, my phone

1:09:06

buzzes, right? and I pull it

1:09:08

out in my pocket to see

1:09:10

who's texting me. I look at

1:09:12

it, it says Chris Bledsoe, I

1:09:14

open it up and it's a

1:09:16

recording of him at that exact

1:09:18

time filming a UAP in his

1:09:21

backyard. Hakem. Look, look what came

1:09:23

to see me today. Oh, it's

1:09:25

this, that other. He was like,

1:09:27

I just felt like I needed

1:09:29

to send this to you. He's

1:09:31

saying that. So either he had

1:09:33

a microphone at Tom McNair's house

1:09:35

and they're there. They're now in

1:09:37

cahoots playing this playing this playing

1:09:39

this game on this game on

1:09:41

me, right. There's something else going

1:09:43

on and I met him later

1:09:45

and I told him I said

1:09:48

dude you sent me that video

1:09:50

at just the right time Why

1:09:52

did he's why did you send

1:09:54

that one to me? He was

1:09:56

like, I don't know I just

1:09:58

felt like I needed to send

1:10:00

it to you and so I

1:10:02

did and I was like well

1:10:04

I was here's what was going

1:10:06

on I was trying to explain

1:10:08

it as do what it looked

1:10:10

like when you when I saw

1:10:12

you AP at your house And

1:10:15

right exactly as I was telling

1:10:17

him I didn't have the words

1:10:19

for it, you sent me that

1:10:21

video. And he was like, that's,

1:10:23

and he looks, he smiles, he

1:10:25

says, that's how the phenomenon works.

1:10:27

I was like, okay, okay. Yeah,

1:10:29

man. Wow, I love that. I

1:10:31

wish we had more time. I

1:10:33

could easily talk to you for

1:10:35

another hour, no problem. Well, we'll

1:10:37

have to do it again then.

1:10:39

Let's do it. Yeah, so much

1:10:42

more to ask you, man. But

1:10:44

okay, thanks for doing this. I'm

1:10:46

super stoked about everything you're doing

1:10:48

in Cy games. And yeah, let's

1:10:50

talk again. Yes, sir. Thank you

1:10:52

very much. Welcome to the post-mind-meld

1:10:54

synchronistic musings, my friends. Hope you

1:10:56

enjoyed that one. However abbreviated, Hakim

1:10:58

had really limited time. So anyway,

1:11:00

the synchronicity. As I'm recording this

1:11:02

one, I forget to turn off

1:11:04

my notifications. I see a text

1:11:06

from my friend Bob pop on

1:11:09

the screen. I don't see what

1:11:11

it is. I just dismiss it.

1:11:13

Of course, Hakim tells this... particularly

1:11:15

novel tale in a sea of

1:11:17

novel tales in this one. One

1:11:19

of my mentors Bill Ray, and

1:11:21

Bill was one of the remote

1:11:23

viewers too, and actually helped run

1:11:25

the program for a little while

1:11:27

as well. This guy said that

1:11:29

he had several encounters where he

1:11:31

bumped into these different types of

1:11:34

entities. And one, he believes that

1:11:36

the entity was... angel or cherubim

1:11:38

that was guarding the arc because

1:11:40

that's what he found out later

1:11:42

he was supposed to be looking

1:11:44

into. About this remote viewer viewing

1:11:46

the arc of the covenant as

1:11:48

part of a remote viewing assignment

1:11:50

and what you may not know

1:11:52

is there's a whole era in

1:11:54

the Fort Meade Army remote viewing

1:11:56

project where they are being told

1:11:58

to attempt to remote view a

1:12:01

number of anomalous things. I wish

1:12:03

I could remember who was in

1:12:05

charge of this. It wasn't the

1:12:07

main person in charge. There was

1:12:09

sort of a revolving door of

1:12:11

people at a point in this

1:12:13

project. It's really hard to keep

1:12:15

track of. All these stories are

1:12:17

in the great book Phenomena by

1:12:19

Anne. Jacobson. But anyway, there's one

1:12:21

character who's just having all of

1:12:23

these remote viewers attempt to view

1:12:25

all sorts of anomalous things. Underground,

1:12:28

UFO bases, things like the Ark

1:12:30

of the Covenant. I decided it

1:12:32

was worth actually dropping in here.

1:12:34

The figure that was doing the

1:12:36

anomalous targets was Ed Dames. He

1:12:38

had remote viewers at Fort Meade,

1:12:40

not only look up the arc

1:12:42

of the covenant, but things having

1:12:44

to do with Atlantis, UFOs, so

1:12:46

fun stuff, but definitely controversial stuff.

1:12:48

So anyway, Hakim tells this story,

1:12:50

obviously, tells the name, says it

1:12:52

was Bob Ray, who did this

1:12:55

remote viewing. I checked my text

1:12:57

after we're done recording. I have

1:12:59

this text from my friend Bob,

1:13:01

and it is an article. about

1:13:03

this remote viewing of the Ark

1:13:05

of the Covenant, it dropped on

1:13:07

the exact same day that Hakeem

1:13:09

and I spoke. So naturally I

1:13:11

kind of thought like, oh, Hakeem

1:13:13

must have seen this article. So

1:13:15

I messaged him and I'm like,

1:13:17

man, this is wild. Did you

1:13:19

know that this news story dropped?

1:13:22

Is that why this was on

1:13:24

your mind? And he said, no,

1:13:26

I didn't find out till later

1:13:28

either. And then we had a

1:13:30

laugh about, you know, he also

1:13:32

told that story during the podcast

1:13:34

to the effect of... the thing

1:13:36

Chris Bledsoe told him, I believe,

1:13:38

about how, man, that's just how

1:13:40

the phenomena works. And that was

1:13:42

my first thought, is just like,

1:13:44

God damn it, this is such

1:13:46

a mind-blowing example of just something

1:13:49

coming out of complete left field.

1:13:51

I mean, this is a pretty

1:13:53

woo story, even for me, this

1:13:55

remote viewing of the Ark of

1:13:57

the Covenant. So to have a

1:13:59

synchronicity on something so novel, just

1:14:01

really blew my mind. Okay. So,

1:14:03

the remote viewing idea I had

1:14:05

was, you may or may not

1:14:07

be familiar with Zenner cards, designed

1:14:09

by Carl Zenner and made famous

1:14:11

by the Parasycology. Trailblazer, J.B. Ryan,

1:14:13

the idea is that these are

1:14:16

cards that you can use to

1:14:18

test your ESP abilities. Essentially, they

1:14:20

consist of five different shapes. You

1:14:22

have a plus sign, a star,

1:14:24

wavy lines, a circle, and a

1:14:26

square. This, my friends, is one

1:14:28

of the five. I want you

1:14:30

to attempt to calm yourself, to

1:14:32

find it in your mind's eye.

1:14:34

What is this shape out of

1:14:36

the five that I just mentioned?

1:14:38

Drop it in the comments. We

1:14:40

will do a tabulation after a

1:14:43

week or so, and we will

1:14:45

see if the odds transcend chance.

1:14:47

Keep your peepers peeled on the

1:14:49

third eye drops YouTube page if

1:14:51

you want to see the result.

1:14:53

I will make a post. It

1:14:55

is going to stay right here

1:14:57

on my desk. Take your time.

1:14:59

Focus in. Which of those five

1:15:01

shapes is it? Again, remember, wavy

1:15:03

lines, star, circle, square, or plus

1:15:05

sign? Drop your answer in the

1:15:07

comments and I will give you

1:15:10

the answer in a post later

1:15:12

this week. All right, much love

1:15:14

until then, my friends.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features