Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
one of my mentors Bill Ray
0:02
was one of the remote viewers
0:04
too and actually helped run the
0:06
program for a little while as
0:08
well. This guy said that he
0:10
had several encounters where he bumped
0:12
into different types of entities and
0:14
one he believes that the entity
0:16
was an angel that was guarding
0:18
the arc because that's what he
0:20
found out later he was supposed
0:22
to be looking into. There are
0:24
people who have some sort of
0:26
connection with these UAPs and and
0:28
when they put their mind in a
0:30
certain space, these UAPs come that
0:33
either see what's up or, you
0:35
know, come because they called them.
0:37
So this idea of cyanics and
0:39
using individuals to communicate and connect
0:41
with these things have been around
0:43
and it seems like, you know,
0:45
that's just like the new hot
0:47
term again. Welcome back to the
0:49
transmission, my friends. If you've been
0:51
watching the channel as of late,
0:53
you likely know, we've been dipping
0:56
into the wonderful, highly weird.
0:58
but seemingly very real history
1:00
of the U.S. military and
1:02
intelligence agencies' interest in sci
1:04
phenomena. And interest in is
1:06
too light of a phrase,
1:08
extensive experimentation with remote viewing
1:10
precognition and a number of
1:12
other flavors of ESP. And
1:15
as juicy and as fantastical
1:17
as all of that, Laura
1:19
is my friends, it is
1:21
easy to forget that the
1:23
people involved in those programs
1:25
are real people. And many
1:27
of them are still out there
1:29
and still even teaching remote viewing techniques.
1:32
Our guest in this one, Hakim Isler,
1:34
is acutely aware of this fact as
1:36
he has studied with not one of
1:38
them but multiple, including the great Joe
1:41
McMonegal who we've mentioned a number of
1:43
times on the channel at this point.
1:45
But speaking of lore, that is far
1:47
from all of the pertinent lore
1:49
when it comes to hakim isler.
1:52
He's got a stunning
1:54
selection of novelty-soaked bullet
1:56
points on his bio. To let just
1:58
a few rip hot is a former
2:00
Special Ops soldier in the U.S. Army.
2:03
Specifically, he was trained in Cyops. So
2:05
this is somebody who really knows how
2:07
to spot disinformation and Cyops at an
2:10
expert level. He's also a survivalist, and
2:12
he's really just a seeker. I mean,
2:14
he made it just abundantly clear in
2:17
this conversation that he is really committed
2:19
to understanding his consciousness, the nature of
2:21
consciousness in general, and what it's capable
2:24
of. He's also spearheading just a really
2:26
intriguing event called Cy Games, the sort
2:28
of elevator pitch is that it's the
2:31
psychic Olympics. But more specifically, it's a
2:33
tournament that aims to really shine a
2:35
light on and push the boundaries of
2:37
Cy Phenomena, including things like remote viewing,
2:40
Psychokinesis, and other ESP capacities. I'm actually
2:42
going to do my best to attend
2:44
because I really want to see this
2:47
in person for myself. For more info
2:49
on that, go to PSI Games International.com.
2:51
a couple of quick wonder nuggets before
2:54
we drop into this one. I had
2:56
a pretty insane synchronicity when it comes
2:58
to this whole remote viewing of the
3:01
Ark of the Covenant tale. If you
3:03
want to hear the story about that
3:05
I'm going to save it. I'm not
3:08
going to tell it now. But go
3:10
to the post script or stay tuned
3:12
for the post script of this mind
3:14
meld if you want to hear that
3:17
tale. Also, it felt appropriate in the
3:19
spirit. of this mind meld to conclude
3:21
with something of a remote viewing challenge.
3:24
If you would like to participate or
3:26
just keep track of what's going on
3:28
with that, stay tuned at the end.
3:31
As usual all the portals for hakim
3:33
isler and third eye drops are in
3:35
the description. Do stimulate that algorithm my
3:38
friends like. Be sure you are subbed.
3:40
Comment. Share if you would be so
3:42
kind. Also sub to third eye drops
3:45
wherever you listen to podcasts. We've got
3:47
hundreds of episodes many of them are
3:49
audio only with some truly brilliant humans
3:51
and I would deeply love to have
3:54
you in the Wonder Lodge over at
3:56
Patriot There's going to be some news
3:58
dropped over there. There's going to be
4:01
some news dropped over there fairly soon.
4:03
But for now, we've got a patron-only
4:05
discord server. We've got a book club.
4:08
We do zoom hangs. You can get
4:10
a array of awards depending on your
4:12
pledge level. Would love to riff with
4:15
you there. But currently, let's do so
4:17
with Haki Missler. Man, you are a
4:19
trained, a trained Cyop agent. You are
4:22
somebody who's deeply informed and interested in
4:24
the history of sigh phenomena, both in
4:26
the sort of classified intelligence agency, agency,
4:28
agency aspects, and personally, you're a trained
4:31
remote viewer, you're doing this incredible side
4:33
games thing. So there's just so much
4:35
to talk about, man. Yeah, let's do
4:38
it, man. I appreciate coming on the
4:40
show and any opportunity to be able
4:42
to share some of this knowledge is
4:45
a great opportunity. And so I thank
4:47
you for that. For sure. Yeah, just
4:49
fresh on my mind because we briefly
4:52
each brought up Monroe at the beginning
4:54
before we were recording. And I remember
4:56
hearing you say that you actually did
4:59
Joe McMonegle's remote viewing training, right? Yes.
5:01
Yeah, I want to hear more about
5:03
that. Yeah. That was fun. It was
5:05
really fun. You know, it was a
5:08
bigger class than what I'm used to.
5:10
So when I first started remote viewing,
5:12
I started with a guy named Paul
5:15
Smith. And Paul Smith was also in
5:17
a remote viewing program. And he keeps
5:19
his class as small on purpose because
5:22
there's a lot of information. So he
5:24
runs it like, you know, you're going
5:26
to a military school to learn this.
5:29
And he learns it very much like
5:31
the way he was taught by English
5:33
swan. you come in there you have
5:36
a bunch of work that you have
5:38
to do and read and you know
5:40
you have to write essays and do
5:43
all this stuff then you like learn
5:45
about remote viewing and then you actually
5:47
do some remote viewings and then you
5:49
have like a crap ton of homework
5:52
when you get home so you got
5:54
to go back to your hotel and
5:56
you got like about two hours worth
5:59
of homework. And then the next morning
6:01
you have to turn it in and
6:03
then go through that. So that was
6:06
like my experience, right? And then I
6:08
go to the Monroe and I go
6:10
to Joe McMone School's class and it
6:13
was a lot more laid back. It
6:15
was a lot more people so they
6:17
had more people to deal with, they
6:20
had some assistance and their goal really
6:22
was to have you understand that you
6:24
are capable of remote viewing. Whereas Paul's
6:26
goal was really to get you. to
6:29
be, it was like an intensive, like
6:31
a master class, like at the end
6:33
of this, you're going to really understand
6:36
these first few stages of what we
6:38
call CRV. And so that was the
6:40
difference between the dynamics, but it was
6:43
just really cool to know that what's
6:45
there. I also find that it's very
6:47
important being in the presence of somebody
6:50
like Joe McMonico and Paul Smith, because
6:52
you know this kind of there's some
6:54
sort of resonance there where their energy
6:57
energy of people who've done those things
6:59
can if you spend enough time around
7:01
them can kind of raise your vibration
7:03
to that level in that particular space.
7:06
Hence why we have like basketball camps
7:08
and baseball camps and you know and
7:10
you know these really high level schools
7:13
where it has the greatest the greatest
7:15
minds or and people want to
7:17
get there because being around those
7:19
individuals really helps. you evolve a
7:22
lot different. So that was really
7:24
great for me. Yeah, yeah. And
7:26
for people that don't know, you
7:28
know, you mentioned CRV, Ingo Swan,
7:30
let's get into the sort of,
7:33
I guess, nerdy history of this
7:35
to some degree, because I've been
7:37
talking about it on the channel
7:39
in some capacity. I want to
7:42
keep talking about it, because I
7:44
think it is this period of
7:46
American history that has the most
7:48
to teach us about the depth
7:50
of wisdom. we already have like
7:53
in archives in terms of sigh
7:55
phenomena and what the human mind
7:57
and human consciousness seems to be
7:59
capable of you know great granted,
8:02
you know, depending who you ask,
8:04
this is still controversial, but it
8:06
doesn't seem like it's controversial to
8:08
the intelligence agencies that were running,
8:10
you know, the DIA, the CIA.
8:13
My God, man, like the volume
8:15
of stuff, even that's just been
8:17
declassified, let alone what we don't
8:19
know about, really seems to indicate
8:22
that not only is there something
8:24
to this. but they used it
8:26
to great effect over the course
8:28
of decades. And this guy, you
8:30
mentioned, Ingo Swan, he's part of
8:33
this original cohort of remote viewers,
8:35
like again, like these psychic spies
8:37
that were able to do incredible
8:39
things in remote viewing. He seems
8:41
like Ingo Swan was capable of
8:44
doing a lot more than just
8:46
remote viewing. Tell me, tell me
8:48
more about. Paul Smith,
8:50
is that his name? Yeah, Paul Smith.
8:53
Yeah, and how did he come into
8:55
contact with Ingo Swan? Oh, so yeah,
8:57
so I want to backtrack too, and
9:00
I want to answer something about Ingo
9:02
Swan. Ingo Swan, you know, when they
9:04
were trying to figure out remote viewing
9:07
and how it worked and come up
9:09
with some sort of protocol, they would
9:11
like have Ingo do stuff consistently the
9:14
same way, and even though he proved
9:16
that he could do it. An ego
9:18
would just come out and be like,
9:21
look, I'm not a one trick pony.
9:23
If this is, if you just want
9:25
me to sit here and look in
9:28
a box, that's boring. Tell me to
9:30
go find somebody somewhere. You know, like
9:32
give me a challenge. And that's really
9:35
unique if you think about it. A
9:37
lot of us, especially in our modern
9:39
day and age, is like, we're just...
9:42
you know if we know something and
9:44
people are praising us for it or
9:46
giving us an opportunity to really explore
9:49
it we're like okay well this is
9:51
the thing I know this is the
9:53
thing I'm comfortable with I'm not really
9:56
sure about going down that other way
9:58
because then I might make a mistake
10:00
and people might you know talk bad
10:03
about me but no he was just
10:05
the opposite he was like if I'm
10:07
done playing games with this like being
10:10
in this room looking in this box
10:12
like I want to go explore the
10:14
galaxy in the world you know like
10:17
that's like I find that really amazing
10:19
and that's why his name is still
10:21
on our lips to this day if
10:24
we look at any field the people
10:26
whose names tend to be on our
10:28
lips and on our minds even though
10:31
hundreds of years or you know whatever
10:33
time span that tend to be reoccurring
10:35
names are the people who really were
10:38
like that, who really pushed the envelope,
10:40
who were like, I'm not comfortable with
10:42
just being comfortable. I want to go
10:45
beyond, right? And so I just wanted
10:47
to highlight that just to pay homage
10:49
to Ingo and the amazing work he
10:52
did by pushing himself, which gave us
10:54
a lot more understanding of what we
10:56
call now controlled remote viewing. Have you,
10:59
sorry to cut you off. Have you
11:01
read any of his books? Yeah, I
11:03
have read some of Engel's books, one
11:06
in which was instrumental in helping me
11:08
move towards creating the side games. Oh,
11:10
cool, cool. And so he's got like
11:13
psychic sexuality and he's got penetration and
11:15
he's got like... Which are two different
11:17
things. Yeah, two totally different things. He's
11:20
got like... The Secrets of Power, One
11:22
and Two, so those two actually were
11:24
helping me with this, kept inspiring this
11:27
thought about side games over and over
11:29
again. And so, yeah, so I have
11:31
read quite a few of his books
11:34
and I have some that I still
11:36
need to read that I haven't. Yeah,
11:38
I haven't actually read any of his
11:41
stuff. I would like to read more.
11:43
Like, I just told you I read
11:45
this book phenomena and I'm just... obsessed
11:48
with it. And I know a lot
11:50
of the core, you know, cast of
11:52
characters in this book all have their
11:55
own work that they did over the
11:57
course of decades. Many of them have
11:59
their own books, you know, Ingo Swan.
12:02
Joe McMonegal, but oh yeah, like hell
12:04
put off and a lot of those,
12:06
the scientists involved too I guess, have
12:09
a whole body of work and need
12:11
to look deeper into. But so anyway,
12:13
Paul Smith, is he, his name sounds
12:16
familiar, was he involved in the. the
12:18
military remote viewing? Yeah, so Paul Smith
12:20
was one of the military remote viewers.
12:23
He got actually recruited invited in by
12:25
Tom McNair. Tom McNair went on to
12:27
be, he got out pretty early on,
12:30
he helped build it, but then got
12:32
out pretty early on and he went
12:34
on to become stay friends with Ingo
12:37
and be one of Ingo's. best students,
12:39
even though he was no longer like
12:41
doing it for the military, Tom McNair
12:44
was. Paul Smith, staying into the military
12:46
for, I think about, staying in that
12:48
program for about 10 years or so,
12:51
seven or ten years, and he not
12:53
only learned all the way up to
12:55
stage six, but then he also helped
12:58
teach it as well. And so that's
13:00
kind of his background into it. He
13:02
was a creative mind. He was an
13:05
intelligence community. He ended up moving across
13:07
the street from Skip Atwater and Tom
13:09
McNair, and they actually approached him and
13:12
asked him if he'd be interested in
13:14
doing this thing that they couldn't really
13:16
talk about. And he said, yeah. And
13:19
then they kind of... you know, read
13:21
him in on a program and then,
13:23
you know, gave him a test and
13:26
he did well and off he went.
13:28
So, how was that? Cool. Are these
13:30
six stages you're talking about? Is this
13:33
part of, so again, people who aren't
13:35
into the history of this, there is
13:37
a now declassified document that I believe
13:40
was architected by Ingo Swan, right? That
13:42
is like the declassified sort of manual
13:44
for how you train remote viewing? Is
13:47
this where the six stages? Yeah, so
13:49
the so when you do remote viewing
13:51
controlled remote viewing you go through these
13:53
six stages and those six stages basically
13:56
well you you go through if you
13:58
learn a few you go through like
14:00
one and two and three to end
14:03
you move on and you go through
14:05
like four and five and then you
14:07
really dive into six. Now there have
14:10
been more stages that Tom McNair have
14:12
been able to move towards, but you
14:14
got two basic types of remote viewing.
14:17
You have like structured and unstructured remote
14:19
viewing, right? And so structured remote viewing
14:21
would be like the CRV which structures
14:24
everything. And part of the reason that
14:26
structure is really important is because your
14:28
brain wants to move towards the logic
14:31
side more than it wants to move,
14:33
especially as adults in American society, more
14:35
than it wants to move towards the
14:38
creative right brain, right? And so instead
14:40
of fighting that consistently, which is something
14:42
that we would do like with a
14:45
lot of really deep meditation practice, you're
14:47
not really fighting it, but you're just
14:49
kind of put it in this place
14:52
like, okay, you're great, but right now
14:54
I need to shut you down and
14:56
I need to kind of go into
14:59
this state of state and just kind
15:01
of be more relaxed and more focused.
15:03
So you're trying to do that, but
15:06
then with the structure of remote viewing
15:08
what it does or CRV control remote
15:10
viewing what is doing is this give
15:13
is keeping busy that left side of
15:15
the brain Yeah, so that your your
15:17
consciousness or the subconsciousness can start to
15:20
go out there and reach out and
15:22
get that information without a lot of
15:24
you know overlay or you know noise
15:27
we call it from the left side
15:29
of the brain and so you're given
15:31
the left side of the brain something
15:34
to do then also for the analyst's
15:36
sake for the person who's going to
15:38
be looking at your work afterwards especially
15:41
if you've got 15 people doing a
15:43
remote viewing on one thing, if we
15:45
all have a different structure on how
15:48
we write stuff down and how we
15:50
put stuff down, that becomes pretty daunting,
15:52
right? So when we were in high
15:55
school, we all learned how to put
15:57
our name and then the date and
15:59
then the place and then we write
16:02
our thing and that had to be
16:04
on one side and we learned that
16:06
method. And that helps the teacher. So
16:09
now. Teacher is able to go to
16:11
the same place over and over again
16:13
that speeds up their job when it
16:16
comes down to grading your papers But
16:18
if we had every 20 people in
16:20
a class and everyone wrote things different
16:23
Some people wrote started on the back
16:25
some people started in the middle some
16:27
people started over here they put some
16:30
people put their name some people didn't
16:32
put their name it creates chaos for
16:34
an analyst you know who's trying to
16:37
look at your work you know so
16:39
that's where the structure really finds its
16:41
power it finds its power with occupying
16:44
the left side of the brain, and
16:46
then also giving you an opportunity to
16:48
really focus on the right side of
16:51
the brain and pulling in that information.
16:53
Then it gives you a place to
16:55
really not have to think about where
16:58
that information needs to go. You already
17:00
kind of know, you know where the
17:02
information needs to go. So you don't
17:05
have one color over here and then
17:07
another color, one color on the left
17:09
side of the page, another color on
17:12
the right side of the page, and
17:14
then like some words in between, and
17:16
then another color at the bottom, which
17:19
again, is a nightmare when you're trying
17:21
to do some information. So that gives
17:23
you that and then the stages are
17:26
just broken down because instead of you
17:28
having to think about everything at once
17:30
Again you take it in you take
17:33
it in phases you have this method
17:35
of doing this that allows you to
17:37
put the information down in a very
17:40
clean and concise way and everything has
17:42
its place. It's a lot more organized
17:44
that way For us creative types like
17:47
myself, you know if you come into
17:49
my office There's books everywhere, there's papers
17:51
everywhere, you know, and it does frustrate
17:54
me sometimes if I have to find
17:56
something and I can't remember what I
17:58
did with it. You know, I'm like,
18:01
oh, yeah, and I'm like, and then
18:03
I meet people who love having everything
18:05
in files and you know, I went
18:08
to how Putoff's house not too long
18:10
ago and I had asked him, you
18:12
know, he was telling me about something
18:15
and he was like, oh. I think
18:17
I have a copy of that. And
18:19
he goes into his office and like
18:22
he's got stuff. I mean more papers
18:24
than we could ever imagine when everything's
18:26
filed. So he was like, oh, it's
18:29
right here. here, boom, boom, boom, pulls
18:31
it out and it was like, I
18:33
was like, when's the last time you
18:36
touched that document, like 15, 20 years
18:38
ago? You know, like, when he knew
18:40
exactly where it was because it was
18:43
organized, it was structured, right? And so
18:45
structure does have a place, you know,
18:47
and they have this saying, if you
18:50
can see that structure, content be damned,
18:52
all right? And that's Rob Kort. He
18:54
was a guy in the remote viewing
18:56
program, but he was talking about how
18:59
important. You know, if you have content,
19:01
that's great. But if it's everywhere, it
19:03
just becomes a cipher, like it's a
19:06
code, you know, that nobody can read,
19:08
but you. But if you have structures
19:10
to it, then it actually becomes something
19:13
that we can, that we can all
19:15
share and grow. Yeah. That's my eternal
19:17
battle, man. It's like, I am not
19:20
a type A personality. type personality. I'm
19:22
a way more like you were alluding
19:24
to a way more sort of creative
19:27
on the fly type of person. We
19:29
got to we got to stop and
19:31
zoom in on how put off though
19:34
because he to me is one of
19:36
the most interesting compelling figures that's been
19:38
involved in this since the very beginning.
19:41
So for people that don't know of
19:43
how put off he was a physicist
19:45
at SRI which was the contractor who
19:48
did a lot of this. research throughout
19:50
decades. So he helped design, you know,
19:52
analyze, did so many things having to
19:55
do with this remote viewing program, you
19:57
know, Project Stargate and all of the
19:59
other sub projects under that umbrella. Hal
20:02
put off and Russell Tard were sort
20:04
of at the core of all of
20:06
this stuff, at least the stuff that's
20:09
declassified. And then I would have to
20:11
think. That if somebody knows some crazy
20:13
shit, hell put off those some crazy
20:16
shit. I mean, Not only was he
20:18
doing that since the early 70s, he
20:20
has now, and you might know more
20:23
about this in me, but I know
20:25
that in his, at his lab in
20:27
the Austin area now, he's still a
20:30
contractor who analyzes anomalous things for the
20:32
government. Like if you go to his,
20:34
again, they talk about this in the
20:37
book phenomenon, but you know, if you
20:39
go to the website of his organization
20:41
and you go to the sort of
20:44
like headings of what they look at.
20:46
It's very mysterious and general, but it's
20:48
enough to be like, what? You know,
20:51
it's like, like an astro, astro archaeology
20:53
and like exotic propulsion and other, I
20:55
think, size stuff. And it's just like,
20:58
well, one, who are you, who are
21:00
you exactly advertising to on this? to
21:02
what does that practically mean and for
21:05
being he's deep into his 80s right
21:07
yes yeah I believe he's like 88
21:09
right now yeah seems like he's totally
21:12
with it though in the most recent
21:14
thing I saw at least yeah yeah
21:16
he's a hundred percent and a hundred
21:19
percent and that that is that's that's
21:21
kind of weird it reminds me of
21:23
the movie Highlander Oh yeah, or the
21:26
series even, whereas like, you know, over
21:28
time people started discovering his photo in
21:30
like, you know, a picture of this
21:33
guy and like all these different, you
21:35
know, he was a doctor and then
21:37
he's a lawyer and then he's got
21:40
his connect and they're like, who is
21:42
this guy? And how long has he
21:44
been around? If you read that book,
21:47
like you were saying the one that
21:49
you're reading now and that I've read
21:51
phenomenon, his name pops up like a
21:54
bunch. And even in Diane Powell Powell's
21:56
book. ESP Enigma, his name pops up
21:58
again in a bunch of different projects.
22:01
And so and then now you got
22:03
these two movies out. One is called
22:05
the program by James Fox, and now
22:08
you have the age of disclosure. Yeah,
22:10
the stuff that this guy has been
22:12
involved in and he knows, it's just
22:15
like, you can't even imagine, you know,
22:17
and so I don't even know, it's
22:19
keeping them young. It's keeping them going
22:22
because he's 88 and he's still sharp
22:24
as attacked, man. I would love to
22:26
talk to him at some point. What
22:29
were you? What was the occasion of
22:31
you hanging with him? I was just
22:33
there as a fly on the wall.
22:36
Some friends are working on a project
22:38
with him and then this was an
22:40
opportunity and I actually work with those
22:43
friends so it was there but they
22:45
had some specific stuff that they were
22:47
working with him on and I was
22:50
just kind of there I asked some
22:52
questions about his thoughts about the side
22:54
games and things of that nature. So
22:57
that would be the extent of what
22:59
I had going on there. Cool. So
23:01
as somebody who's been, you know, is
23:04
a practitioner and is actively interested in
23:06
this stuff, not just historically, but like
23:08
I said, as a practitioner, and also
23:11
someone who is in the military, when
23:13
you read phenomena and you see, you
23:15
know, okay, all of this research is
23:18
cut off in like 95 or whatever,
23:20
when some of it comes to light.
23:22
Do you buy that? You know, and
23:25
plus now we're both aware of like
23:27
the current whistleblower environment with Jake Barber
23:29
coming out, you know, his insistence that
23:32
there are these cyanic assets that have
23:34
been being used by the military. What
23:36
do you think really happened there? Do
23:39
you think it went deeper, darker? You
23:41
know they changed all the vernacular around
23:43
it. Do you think they really stopped
23:46
it and then other Agencies picked up
23:48
the mantle like what what's your theory
23:50
on that? Yeah, so that's a great
23:53
question and the reality is is that
23:55
Normally when things work really well, we
23:57
don't just stop doing exactly And so
24:00
we just look at it from that
24:02
logic side. Now people claim that, oh,
24:04
it wasn't enough, you know, but they
24:06
ran this thing for 20 years. And
24:09
even if you look at the final
24:11
nail, per se, in the coffin, when
24:13
they had Jessica Utz, who is a
24:16
statistician, and the guy who was like
24:18
the amazing Randy's right-hand man, or he
24:20
was a protégé. And they had them
24:23
both look into this. you know that
24:25
guy came back and was like yeah
24:27
I think I don't believe it but
24:30
the research was done well right and
24:32
so he still was kind of being
24:34
a skeptic even though he couldn't find
24:37
a hole in what was going on
24:39
and then Annie I mean not Annie
24:41
Jacobs Jessica Uts was like yeah statistically
24:44
this thing is real so like and
24:46
she was the you know one of
24:48
the top statisticians in the world at
24:51
the time so So but it came
24:53
over and as soon as the CIA
24:55
got it before that paper was even
24:58
they had these two individuals look into
25:00
it and before it's way I understand
25:02
it before that was even published or
25:05
before it even came to the CIA
25:07
the CIA got the program the remote
25:09
viewing program from the DIA I believe
25:12
and they shut it down. and then
25:14
the paper came out so they were
25:16
like already just ready ready to shut
25:19
it down. Okay. Now if you follow
25:21
this really well and I don't feel
25:23
any type of way anymore like you
25:26
know this this person is my friend
25:28
so I didn't want to you know
25:30
break any confidence. But there's a gentleman
25:33
named Skip Atwater, and he recently said
25:35
on a podcast or a YouTube interview
25:37
that there were five other programs. Now
25:40
I already remember that, or there were
25:42
five programs total that based on his
25:44
clearances, he knew about that other people
25:47
would not have known about, right, who
25:49
were even in the remote viewing program.
25:51
So in the Army's remote viewing program,
25:54
so he was like, there were five,
25:56
you know, so then what happened to
25:58
those five? We only know about one.
26:01
We know about the Army's program, but
26:03
we pretty of certain that the NSA
26:05
had a program and then there's other
26:08
organizations that probably had programs going on.
26:10
What I would straight to say is
26:12
what Russell Tarck said recently in one
26:15
of his interviews was that one of
26:17
the things, the common issues that they
26:19
had about remote viewing is that they
26:22
couldn't stop it. They couldn't figure out
26:24
a way to stop it. So if
26:26
they couldn't stop it and the other
26:29
governments couldn't stop it, then what you
26:31
have is that you have this kind
26:33
of wide open gap where anybody can
26:36
like just come in if they believe
26:38
in the techniques and they practice the
26:40
techniques they can go in and like
26:43
take secrets or find secret information and
26:45
you as a government who is in
26:47
the business of secret information couldn't stop
26:50
it a matter of fact I think
26:52
it was Pat Price or Ingo Swan
26:54
one of them said that the I
26:57
think yeah it was Pat Price the
26:59
more you try to hide something the
27:01
more it becomes visible and appealing in
27:04
the psychic space right interesting so now
27:06
we have all these secrets of people
27:08
with these clearances trying to hide stuff
27:11
no in the psychic space this stuff
27:13
is like exposed it's out there it's
27:15
ready to be no does that make
27:18
sense yeah oh yeah so so now
27:20
as a government or an organization what
27:22
do you think would be the only
27:25
way well okay so you're telling me
27:27
I can't physically or I can't mentally
27:29
or psychically stop people from getting all
27:32
my secrets. So, okay, well I guess
27:34
the only thing we can do is
27:36
provide some sort of misinformation campaign, like,
27:39
or create some Cyop so that I
27:41
can get these people to like not
27:43
stop doing it, stop believing that this
27:46
is really working and we've already given
27:48
them all of this data that shows
27:50
that it does work. So now we
27:53
need to come up with. contraindicated data
27:55
or data that says that it doesn't
27:57
work. So now that's what I'm, that's
28:00
what they're, I think that that would
28:02
be a logical way for it to
28:04
go is that way. So. To answer
28:07
your question, I think yeah, it still,
28:09
it makes sense that it would still
28:11
be going on somewhere in the organization.
28:14
And China and Russia spent a lot
28:16
of money and they had some very,
28:18
we know, based on data, based on
28:21
research, based on information that's come out.
28:23
They had very successful kids and adults
28:25
that could do all types of things
28:28
with psychic abilities. You
28:30
just got to ask yourself, just
28:32
put it in your shoes, just
28:34
say, hey, I'm at my, I'm
28:36
at my house, or I'm in
28:39
this field of teaching kids martial
28:41
arts, right? And I recognize that
28:43
there's this thing that works for
28:45
people when it comes down to
28:47
marketing my business. But it could
28:50
be questionable as to whether it's
28:52
a, you know, it's a good
28:54
thing to do, right? So maybe
28:56
I just not say I'm doing
28:58
it, but do it anyway. But
29:00
I don't want to be out
29:03
there. I wouldn't tell anybody that,
29:05
you know, openly, but I'm going
29:07
to do it anyway behind closed
29:09
doors because it's valuable and it's
29:11
going to help me be successful.
29:14
So I think people can relate
29:16
to it when they put themselves
29:18
in those shoes versus just looking
29:20
at this big government unless you
29:22
just don't want to believe it.
29:25
You know, everybody's threshold is different.
29:27
So some people just don't want
29:29
to believe that. And I think
29:31
the religious organizations did the same
29:33
thing. You know, oh, wait a
29:36
minute. Should we be out here
29:38
telling everybody they have these type
29:40
of abilities and powers? Because that's
29:42
going to make it really tough
29:44
to find followers and control. Now
29:47
I haven't done this research. And
29:49
so I will say that, but
29:51
I... I'm confident that it's true,
29:53
but I haven't delved into it
29:55
as deeply as I've delved into
29:58
other topics. So I could be
30:00
incorrect. So I'll just put that.
30:02
caveat on it. There's a conversation,
30:04
there's some information that's out that
30:06
says that at one point a
30:09
certain religious group that we know
30:11
actually did believe in reincarnation. But
30:13
then they started saying that themselves,
30:15
well, if people think they can
30:17
keep coming back over and over
30:20
again, then they're not going to
30:22
have the urgency to choose our...
30:24
deity or our God as the
30:26
main God and then us as
30:28
priests as a conduit for that.
30:30
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, yeah, and
30:33
a lot of people don't know
30:35
that if you go far enough
30:37
back in history, you know, let's
30:39
just call it Christianity because that's
30:41
the most obvious example of what
30:44
you're saying. Like there is no
30:46
doctrine of reincarnation in Christianity or
30:48
at least most kinds of Christianity.
30:50
But if you go far enough
30:52
back into Greek philosophy... this idea
30:55
of metam psychosis or reincarnation is
30:57
all over the place. Plato talks
30:59
about it, all the prehistoric philosophers
31:01
talk about it. So this was
31:03
a widely believed thing, not just
31:06
in the Eastern world and Eastern
31:08
spirituality, but also in Western philosophy
31:10
and esoteric traditions. So yeah, it
31:12
is suspicious how that just sort
31:14
of falls off the doctrinal map.
31:17
And before I forget, I wanted
31:19
to share that one anecdote from
31:21
phenomena just illustrate how seriously they
31:23
took the threat of remote viewing.
31:25
There's that whole episode where they're
31:28
having a meeting with some general
31:30
and you know he's worried about
31:32
remote viewers being able to see
31:34
where they're hiding the nuclear warheads.
31:36
And he gets visibly angry apparently
31:39
in this meeting and is like,
31:41
so what you're telling me. is
31:43
they can find where they are.
31:45
That's what you're telling me. Our
31:47
enemies, remote viewers can find where
31:50
they are. And they're just kind
31:52
of like, yeah, you know, we
31:54
can't, we can't guarantee that that's
31:56
not. a distinct possibility. So then
31:58
they create this whole insane underground
32:01
network of tunnels. I think they
32:03
say millions of square miles on
32:05
underground in Nevada with the express
32:07
purpose of shuffling around dummy nuclear
32:09
warheads in real nuclear warheads on
32:11
the chance that remote viewers might
32:14
be able to see where the
32:16
warheads are. They create this whole
32:18
crazy underground complex so they can
32:20
move the warheads around. It's nuts.
32:22
It's nuts the lengths that our
32:25
government has gone to and these
32:27
other governments have gone to. I
32:29
don't think most people. even if
32:31
they know this exists, I don't
32:33
think they appreciate the insane amounts
32:36
of effort that had been put
32:38
into all this stuff. It's crazy.
32:40
And it was either, so then
32:42
to follow up that story, from
32:44
what I understand, they actually created
32:47
that shell game with these assels
32:49
and then they had remote viewers
32:51
try to find them and they
32:53
did find them. And so then
32:55
that general got even more Matt
32:58
because that was his baby, you
33:00
know. And he didn't believe in
33:02
all this remote viewing business. So
33:04
he, from what I understand, was
33:06
another catalyst, another nail in the
33:09
coffin for the remote viewing program,
33:11
not because it didn't work, but
33:13
because it made him look bad
33:15
and he spent all this money.
33:17
And that was going to, that
33:20
was like his pet thing. That
33:22
was his baby. And so the
33:24
idea that these woo-w people can
33:26
come out of nowhere and then,
33:28
you know. take this really well
33:31
thought out idea with millions and
33:33
millions of dollars behind it and
33:35
just kind of shut it down
33:37
was not okay with him. And
33:39
so he was he was very
33:42
instrumental in and demonizing this kind
33:44
of program. And so, so yeah,
33:46
that guy went to great lengths
33:48
to really shut things or put
33:50
an L in that coffin for
33:52
remote view. Yeah. Yeah. And then
33:55
there's this whole other added angle
33:57
now of the of the cyanic
33:59
program. and air quotes. And side
34:01
note, I always wonder if that
34:03
word is just a sort of
34:06
agnostic word that they're using
34:08
publicly to hide whatever
34:10
the real terminology is. That's
34:13
one of the things when
34:15
you read a book like
34:17
Phenomena or you look into
34:20
any of these declassified documents.
34:22
They're always kind of subtly
34:24
changing the language or they're
34:26
inventing new words like. Man,
34:29
I'm actually drawing a blank on
34:31
some of them now. But yeah,
34:34
they're rarely just overtly
34:36
using the words, you know, psychic
34:39
or telekinesis or psychokinesis
34:41
or whatever. They're making
34:43
up terminology so that
34:46
it's more esoteric and
34:48
harder to find. So I
34:50
have to wonder, you know, what
34:52
is like there's got to be
34:54
some. language lurking underneath
34:57
cyanic. But anyway,
34:59
if we just go with this,
35:01
you know, now agnostic
35:04
publicly used term of cyanic,
35:06
this is adding a whole
35:08
new layer to this. It's not
35:10
just, you know, remote viewing
35:13
and precognition
35:15
psychokinesis. It's using
35:17
those abilities to contact
35:20
something else or summon
35:22
something else. And I would
35:24
I'm dying to know like where this
35:26
comes from like when they figured
35:29
this out how they figured it
35:31
out you know again assuming that
35:33
this is legit but yeah did
35:35
you have any inkling of this
35:38
existing before the barber stuff came
35:40
to light or was that sort
35:42
of a. revelation to you too.
35:44
Yeah that's a great question so
35:46
Sionics the term is actually an
35:49
old term it goes back to
35:51
like 1950s some people even speculate
35:53
1930s and the idea and then
35:55
it became like a Dungeons and
35:57
Dragons like gaming term and then
36:00
it kind of took back its
36:02
normal scientific or, or, or, or,
36:04
or, or, has been around, but
36:06
the idea of basically the way
36:08
it sounds is it's more in
36:10
line with what the remote viewing
36:12
program started coming up with, which
36:14
is this idea of remote influence,
36:17
right? And so people like Limb
36:19
Buchanan, who's also a part of
36:21
the remote viewing program, who back
36:23
in the day, who was also
36:25
a part of that, he... He
36:27
teaches and talks about remote influence
36:29
and this idea that you can
36:31
influence people remotely at a distance
36:33
in that book phenomenon and the
36:36
Jacobs talks about it as well.
36:38
The idea of being able to
36:40
heal people and deal with different
36:42
types of aspects of people's body
36:44
system remotely and the research that
36:46
they've done there. And so this
36:48
has kind of been a thing,
36:50
but not necessarily with extraterrestrials or
36:52
these NHIs or whatever you would
36:55
call these different beings and their
36:57
craft these UAPs. However, there has
36:59
been research and studies out there
37:01
that talk about people having these
37:03
type of connections where these beings
37:05
or these UAPs seem to be
37:07
coming back to them over and
37:09
over again and what is the
37:11
connection there? And with my friend,
37:14
a friend of mine, Chris Bledsoe,
37:16
When they started doing a lot
37:18
of research on him, they started
37:20
saying, or at least it came
37:22
out in his book, UFO of
37:24
God, that Jim Sim event, which
37:26
is a CIA guy, really high
37:28
level CIA individual, was saying that
37:30
what they know, or alluded to,
37:33
I believe, in the book, what
37:35
they know is that there are
37:37
people who have some sort of
37:39
temporal or some sort of connection
37:41
with these UAPs, and when they...
37:43
put their mind in a certain
37:45
space, these UAPs come that either
37:47
see what's up or, you know,
37:50
come because they called them or
37:52
nobody really knows what that relationship
37:54
is like is it a moth
37:56
to a flame type thing where
37:58
it just becomes interesting like what's
38:00
going on over here this guy
38:02
all of a sudden is shining
38:04
brighter than everybody else let me
38:06
go see what's going on there
38:09
so I can gather data on
38:11
how what levels these people are
38:13
able to accomplish yeah or is
38:15
it really that you're just calling
38:17
that those those beings and again
38:19
if there are multiple and also
38:21
if there are multiple different types
38:23
of beings then some of them
38:25
may be interested in things for
38:28
different reasons right and so we
38:30
don't know what that is neither
38:32
so this idea of cyanics and
38:34
using individuals to communicate and connect
38:36
with these things have been around
38:38
and it seems like, you know,
38:40
that's just like the new hot
38:42
term again because it was brought
38:44
up in this particular context with
38:47
this particular gentleman who was divulging
38:49
a lot of really interesting important
38:51
information. And so now we have
38:53
a government or ex-government official or
38:55
individual that's coming forward and saying,
38:57
yes, this is real. this is
38:59
what we were doing, and here's
39:01
a term so that can help
39:03
you guys wrap your head around
39:06
it, which I find maybe this
39:08
is, you know, what we're seeing
39:10
as a soft disclosure as all
39:12
of these terms are coming out
39:14
and giving people things that they
39:16
can hold on to now, and
39:18
it's not, it's becoming a little
39:20
bit more concrete now. Yeah, it
39:22
seems like that's what's going on
39:25
to me. If the whole thing
39:27
isn't just some massive... sigh up
39:29
for some unbelievably complex network of
39:31
reasons. I feel because there's no
39:33
one explanation that I can think
39:35
of that would justify any kind
39:37
of like really really long-term sigh
39:39
up like this. I feel like
39:41
it would have to be a
39:44
very long narrative. shifting con game
39:46
or something like that. But I'm
39:48
more warm to the idea of
39:50
what you're suggesting that this is
39:52
like a gradual slow roll disclosure.
39:54
And there are various aspects of
39:56
that disclosure that they're identifying and
39:58
they're probably like, all right, how
40:00
are we going to bring up
40:03
this idea that we're already constantly,
40:05
probably in contact with other. life
40:07
forms or archetypes or to use
40:09
Robert Monroe's term energy systems or
40:11
like whatever you want to call
40:13
them beings I don't know well
40:15
let's just let's throw this out
40:17
there let's throw out this idea
40:19
of cyanic contact with benevolent, and
40:22
that's the other thing that's really
40:24
interesting about Barber's story, is he
40:26
really pushes this idea that it
40:28
is benevolent, that no matter what
40:30
you hear, you know, scary stories
40:32
about abduction, scary stories about, you
40:34
know, things wanting to feed on
40:36
you or take you over or
40:38
experiment on you, no, that is
40:41
not what these things are. They're
40:43
of a spiritual nature, they're benevolent,
40:45
Chris Bledsoe, who you brought up,
40:47
says the same thing. But there's
40:49
a lot of people who have,
40:51
you know, who are like, okay,
40:53
well, what about all these anomalous
40:55
injuries? What about the radiation, you
40:57
know, damage that people are suffering?
41:00
What about, you know, what about
41:02
all of those stories of abduction?
41:04
What about cattle mutilate? You know,
41:06
there's so many following questions. And
41:08
of course, I don't think we
41:10
know the answers to those questions,
41:12
but yeah, it's, I have to
41:14
agree that it's probably, I think
41:17
the most parsimonious thing. if it
41:19
is real, is that it's got
41:21
to be some kind of slow
41:23
roll disclosure. Yeah, well, I would
41:25
offer this too, and let's game
41:27
this out a little bit. So
41:29
if you want to avoid catastrophic
41:31
disclosure of an entities or entity
41:33
or entities that exist out there.
41:36
Where would you have the most
41:38
success to do that? Telling people
41:40
that some of the entities and
41:42
harping on, some of the entities
41:44
being, you know, evil and mean
41:46
and ready to kill you and
41:48
do all this stuff or say
41:50
that they're good? So, like, I
41:52
would say, yeah, hey, we know
41:55
about these other ones that are
41:57
bad, but let's just talk about
41:59
the good ones because we are
42:01
trying to do this gradual disclosure.
42:03
And if we just start saying,
42:05
yeah, they're bad, they're bad, they're
42:07
bad. Then when they do unveil
42:09
themselves, I mean, that's when all
42:11
hell is going to break loose.
42:14
But if we say they're good,
42:16
they're good, and then they are
42:18
unveil themselves, and they're good, and
42:20
then we, and the people won't
42:22
freak out freak out as much.
42:24
Does that make sense? Totally. So
42:26
I would, that's what I would
42:28
say as well, because I think,
42:30
you know, what we do know,
42:33
and I don't know if we
42:35
can say, I mean, we could
42:37
always say if they exist. because
42:39
there's still all these different motives
42:41
of why people are doing that.
42:43
But I think it's pretty clear
42:45
now that they're coming out saying,
42:47
yes, they're there. You got Colonel
42:49
Carl Nell who just came out
42:52
straight out and said, hey, look,
42:54
they're here. Nonhuman intelligence has been
42:56
interacting with humanity. This interaction is
42:58
not new and it's been ongoing.
43:00
And they're unelected. people in the
43:02
government that are aware of that.
43:04
There's zero doubt. You know, they're
43:06
interacting on age of disclosure. From
43:08
what I understand, you have multiple
43:11
people from multiple different governments, high-level
43:13
individuals saying, yes, they're here. Now,
43:15
they're not going into detail from
43:17
what I understand as to why
43:19
they're here or whether they're good
43:21
or bad, and, you know, some
43:23
people have had bad encounters. I
43:25
would also offer up for balance,
43:27
one of my mentors, Bill Ray.
43:30
And Bill was one of the
43:32
remote viewers too and actually helped
43:34
run the program for a little
43:36
while as well and went on.
43:38
to have a very very very
43:40
long intelligence encounter intelligence career where
43:42
he didn't retire until he was
43:44
like in his 80s. So this
43:46
guy said that he had several
43:49
encounters where he bumped into these
43:51
different types of entities and one
43:53
he believes that the entity was.
43:55
angel or cherubim that was guarding
43:57
the arc because that's what he
43:59
found out later he was supposed
44:01
to be looking into and others
44:03
he was at the ship that
44:05
he went to it was remote
44:08
viewing the site where a bunch
44:10
of people disappeared from the ship
44:12
and he started having feelings of
44:14
these people being in panic and
44:16
they were dealing with something that
44:18
was very dark and evil so
44:20
much to the point where even
44:22
when he explains it he says
44:25
the visceral response that he gets
44:27
is just still overwhelming and unsettling,
44:29
just talking about it. And so
44:31
one of the things he left
44:33
me with was he said that
44:35
there could, he's worked with double
44:37
agents or he's worked with undercover
44:39
agents that he was running or
44:41
assets, he would call them when
44:44
he was working for these different
44:46
governmental agencies. And He's had instances
44:48
where people, he's a spy, he
44:50
knows these other people were spies
44:52
and they're working for him, he's
44:54
using them as assets, and they've
44:56
been so convincing even to him
44:58
that they were really working for
45:00
just him and giving him information
45:03
and then he finds out there
45:05
a double agent, right? He says,
45:07
so if I'm this super trained
45:09
guys. trained in all of the
45:11
techniques to spot this type of
45:13
stuff and somebody can still fool
45:15
me? How are we to think
45:17
that some entity on some other
45:19
level can't do the same thing?
45:22
Right. So I said, well, what
45:24
would you say? Would you say
45:26
people should take this and go
45:28
out there and try to explore
45:30
these entities? And he said, no,
45:32
run the other way. And I
45:34
said, And what? He's like, yeah.
45:36
He's like, yeah, they could be
45:38
good, but they could be tricking
45:41
you. And they could be using,
45:43
I mean, we could do it
45:45
on a base level. You know
45:47
Chris Ramsey. You know, the average
45:49
person is really easy to fool.
45:51
And it's our desire to say
45:53
we know better, that we are
45:55
better, that we can't be full,
45:57
that actually makes us even more
46:00
fullable, right? That was the same
46:02
tactic we use in Sa'o. Those
46:04
who know are the easiest to
46:06
go after because you wrap everything
46:08
in their knowing and then they'll
46:10
just eat it up, right? So
46:12
us on this little small base
46:14
level, we're saying we can do
46:16
that, then imagine what some entity
46:19
that knows... about the galaxy and
46:21
all this stuff about consciousness could
46:23
do to us and how they
46:25
would be able to fool us.
46:27
You know, so I think that
46:29
was a very fair assessment, not
46:31
saying that I agree with it
46:33
100% but I think that's a
46:35
very fair assessment is that yes,
46:38
you can believe what you want
46:40
and feel what you want and
46:42
say if for me it was
46:44
true, pure love and energy, but
46:46
also maybe we should stay open
46:48
to the possibility that that could
46:50
be... a trip. Yeah, man. Yeah,
46:52
that it's such a hall of
46:54
mirrors. But I think for people
46:57
like myself and I would venture
46:59
just based on what I know
47:01
about you people like you who
47:03
have this, you know, we have
47:05
this seeking disposition. You're you're a
47:07
martial artist. You're a soldier. I
47:09
grew up doing martial arts. You
47:11
know, I'm sure you're very drawn
47:13
to the like the hero's journey
47:16
motif. I am too. It's like
47:18
Just because there's fear there doesn't
47:20
like doesn't mean I don't want
47:22
to investigate it like yeah I
47:24
still I still want to go
47:26
into that like dark forest and
47:28
poke around and see what's there
47:30
and see what's real. Maybe I
47:32
don't need to go into the
47:35
deepest darkest you know cave that's
47:37
the most brimming with goblins or
47:39
anything. but I want to get
47:41
a look, I want to see
47:43
what's going on to some degree,
47:45
you know, and that's led me
47:47
down a multitude of paths of
47:49
exploring different things in my own
47:52
life and obviously it has for
47:54
you too. So I'm assuming that
47:56
you still encourage people to investigate
47:58
these qualities, these realms. I mean,
48:00
you must because you're. It's part
48:02
of your it's part of your
48:04
your living. It's your you're you're
48:06
doing Cy games you're yeah Some
48:08
of these techniques. Well, I think
48:11
you know, I think we could
48:13
hide from it and let it
48:15
you know There's there's things happening
48:17
to you and you happening to
48:19
it right and so when things
48:21
happen to you you have very
48:23
little control over how You know,
48:25
you have control over how you
48:27
respond, but you don't have a
48:30
lot of control over how it
48:32
happens to you. When you happen
48:34
to it, you not only have
48:36
control on how you respond, but
48:38
you also have a little bit
48:40
more control on how you engage.
48:42
And so I think it's fair
48:44
and I think it's a balanced
48:46
way to come at it to
48:49
say, well, okay, instead of me
48:51
hiding from this thing that is
48:53
there and could just start popping
48:55
up in my life. And then
48:57
me then have being motivated to
48:59
try to figure it out, which
49:01
means that I'm reactive and that
49:03
never really works well. It's always
49:05
really good to be proactive and
49:08
then hope for the best and
49:10
you know plan for the worst,
49:12
hope for the best, right? It's
49:14
in my opinion. And so I
49:16
always think this idea of saying
49:18
okay I'm gonna do this but
49:20
I'm gonna do this a responsible
49:22
way I'm gonna find somebody who
49:24
I feel is a good mentor
49:27
not I'm not a I'm not
49:29
a high proponent of like oh
49:31
I just need to meditate and
49:33
I'll tap in and I can
49:35
and I am the guru I've
49:37
just got to awaken the guru
49:39
within me you know like yeah
49:41
yeah I believe that there's this
49:43
ability and these powers there but
49:46
I think mentorship is just like
49:48
really important because there are elders
49:50
and they've gone through some stuff
49:52
and they've had experiences. Now that
49:54
doesn't mean that all of their
49:56
experience is going to relate to
49:58
ours, right? Because you could be
50:00
the one that breaks the mold.
50:02
I tell people that all the
50:05
time when they ask me business
50:07
advice. I say, well, look, this
50:09
didn't work for me, but I
50:11
can't say that won't work for
50:13
you because you could be the
50:15
guy that changes everything, you know,
50:17
or the girl that changes everything.
50:19
try it out. So I am
50:21
open to it. I feel that
50:24
that's one of the reasons for
50:26
the side games. The side games
50:28
is like, hey, if we have
50:30
these abilities, we need to push
50:32
them forward. We need to grow
50:34
them. And up to this point,
50:36
you know, yeah, the only person
50:38
who's really, the only place that's
50:40
put real money and research behind
50:43
this and doing it on a
50:45
real basis is these governmental agencies.
50:47
I don't know if the government
50:49
is always the has the best
50:51
interest of the people all the
50:53
time in these different organizations. So
50:55
maybe we should have a citizen
50:57
version of this as well where
50:59
we actually try to. raise up
51:02
our abilities so that we can
51:04
also engage and we can have
51:06
conversations at the table, right? Because
51:08
the government is supposed to be
51:10
for the people, but it is
51:12
supposed to be a representation for
51:14
the people, but we also want
51:16
to have the people be a
51:19
representation for the people on some
51:21
level. So the side games is
51:23
like, hey, if people are bumping
51:25
into these entities and people have
51:27
these abilities, let's put it on
51:29
the world stage where one we
51:31
can build a strong positive community
51:33
around this. We can collaborate. We
51:35
can have people who have different
51:38
experiences and different strengths collaborate with
51:40
each other to help raise up
51:42
all ships and not just my
51:44
little group in my little corner
51:46
of the world. And then we
51:48
can find mentorship. And then lastly,
51:50
we need to bring on the
51:52
bring up the next generation in
51:54
a world where they don't feel
51:57
like they have to shut down
51:59
their gifts and then they can.
52:01
can reclaim the years that they've
52:03
shut down their gifts. So if
52:05
you think about this is, and
52:07
you've probably seen this too in
52:09
the circles that you go into,
52:11
when we go to Monroe or
52:13
all these different places, the majority
52:16
of the people there are in
52:18
their 40s, 50s, coming to these
52:20
things. And when you talk to
52:22
them, well, how did you get
52:24
started? Oh, yeah, you know, when
52:26
I was a kid, I used
52:28
to be able to see things
52:30
and talk to things and I
52:32
had all these experiences. parents, society,
52:35
community said, nope, that's not something
52:37
we do and that's not real
52:39
or that's evil or whatever thing
52:41
came up. And then they shut
52:43
it down. And then at some
52:45
point they go years and years
52:47
and years and then they have,
52:49
they meet somebody or have an
52:51
experience and they say, oh yeah,
52:54
that's right. When I was a
52:56
kid, I used to do that.
52:58
Let me start now as an
53:00
adult investigating this more. What would
53:02
our society be like if people
53:04
from that age of 10, when
53:06
they had that first experience was
53:08
supported, given love, shown mentorship, given
53:10
mentorship, and now they grow up.
53:13
for 10, 20, 30 years of
53:15
just practicing and believing in this
53:17
ability, where would we be now?
53:19
Where would we be now? What
53:21
would that be like? And so
53:23
the Side Games is like, okay,
53:25
how do we get that more
53:27
of that? How do we make
53:29
a place that's fun for these
53:32
children to go to? part of
53:34
that is meeting them where they
53:36
at. They like to play, they
53:38
like fun. So let's meet them
53:40
where they have fun and let's
53:42
just grow from there, you know,
53:44
and let's do that for adults
53:46
too. And now we can also
53:48
inspire each other, we can push
53:51
each other to new levels. Our
53:53
friend Chris, another friend of ours,
53:55
this guy named Nelson, believes in
53:57
this idea of, you know, he's
53:59
a memory champion, a six-time world
54:01
memory champion or a US memory
54:03
champion. And he talks about how
54:05
when the memory, there was a
54:07
time that science thought that you
54:10
can only hold about nine things,
54:12
six to nine things in your
54:14
head. that one time right and
54:16
that was it that was like
54:18
the cap but now they're up
54:20
to like 500 the champion can
54:22
hold 500 different numbers or items
54:24
in their head and recite them
54:27
in order to you at a
54:29
time right and so that happened
54:31
through competition you know he said
54:33
the same with cards they used
54:35
to say you have five minutes
54:37
to remember 12 Playing cards in
54:39
an order that we choose and
54:41
that was the that was the
54:43
top nobody could beat that he
54:46
said he said then it turned
54:48
into 12 seconds to memorize the
54:50
full deck Wow and just recently
54:52
last year he said that a
54:54
kid a young kid Was able
54:56
to memorize a full deck in
54:58
any order that you put it
55:00
in seven seconds One, two, three,
55:02
four, five, six, seven. The kids
55:05
has already memorized the whole decade.
55:07
Probably, I don't even know how
55:09
they do it, you know, but
55:11
I was just like, that's insane.
55:13
You know, but how did that
55:15
happen? That happened through competition, people
55:17
getting together and, you know, pushing
55:19
each other. So, or a new
55:21
word I heard recently co-op. co-opetition.
55:24
Yeah, it's like cooperation, competition together,
55:26
where we're still working for the
55:28
same goal, but we're pushing each
55:30
other through this inspirational way. So
55:32
that's really what the side games
55:34
is, and that's what we're all
55:36
about, is like, hey, how do
55:38
we do, how do we get
55:40
people to spend more time and
55:43
consciousness? How do we make room
55:45
for youth to kind of grow
55:47
up with this? How do we
55:49
get more people to collaborate and
55:51
come together and build a community
55:53
around this that supports one another?
55:55
take it out of the lab
55:57
where you know labs is great
55:59
a lab is great but you
56:02
know that it's only but so
56:04
far you can get there and
56:06
then you what you're gonna publish
56:08
another paper that nobody's going to
56:10
read. Right. And that people who
56:12
are skeptical are going to say,
56:14
like, no, no, this is, this
56:16
is, this is nonsense. Yeah, I,
56:18
I mean, obviously I respect the
56:21
scientific method and think it's unbelievably
56:23
important and it has rewarded us
56:25
in so many ways. I don't
56:27
want to straw man it. But
56:29
we got to remember, the scientific
56:31
method is something that. human beings
56:33
invented to try to get repeatable
56:35
results and ascertain things about reality.
56:37
It doesn't in and of itself
56:40
determine what is real, right? And
56:42
there's so many parts of life
56:44
that are not captureable, you know,
56:46
by the scientific method. Any kind
56:48
of qualitative, you know, to use
56:50
the philosophy of consciousness term, like
56:52
qualia-based experience, none of that can
56:54
really be captured by the scientific.
56:56
method and I think these abilities
56:59
are so endemicly tied up in
57:01
those qualitative kinds of knowing that
57:03
how you even try to capture
57:05
that just in statistics is not
57:07
it's not satisfactory you know and
57:09
and going back to a lot
57:11
of the justification that they used
57:13
to shut these programs down a
57:15
lot of it had to do
57:18
with like Well, yeah,
57:20
this might be impressive, but it's
57:22
not repeatable. Like this, this one
57:24
occasion, you know, maybe that really
57:26
yielded results, but it's not, you
57:28
can't like put, put it in
57:30
a lab and repeat it. And
57:32
it's like, yeah, well, you don't
57:34
need to do that to prove
57:36
that there's something there. Like, if
57:38
you have a crazy experience or
57:40
I have a crazy experience, I
57:43
know that that happened. this positive
57:45
environment this this friendly environment where
57:47
we're all hanging out and writhing
57:49
and exploring and like seeing what's
57:51
possible that's super exciting man it's
57:53
almost crazy to me that that
57:55
hasn't happened before, that there hasn't
57:57
been something like this, or maybe
57:59
like back in the day and
58:01
like the like Ecelyn's heyday or
58:03
something, maybe they did things like
58:05
this, but yeah, I've never heard
58:07
of anything. Yeah, I know the
58:10
right just to give credit were
58:12
credit is due that went and
58:14
I found this out after I've
58:16
already embarked on the side games.
58:18
I started talking to John Cruz
58:20
who runs the Ryan Research Center.
58:22
Oh, he was saying, Oh, yeah,
58:24
we do we do something like
58:26
a small thing called the side
58:28
games and it's only like 20
58:30
of us we get together and
58:32
we'll play this thing. So it
58:34
actually existed out there and I
58:37
didn't even know that, but then
58:39
it wasn't on this scale. And
58:41
this is really, it's called Side
58:43
Games International because I'm trying to
58:45
bring people from all over the
58:47
world together under this banner, under
58:49
us being able to really explore
58:51
this and build a multinational community.
58:53
where people can train and feel
58:55
comfortable exploring these different realms and
58:57
these different avenues. So that's that's
58:59
really the key right there. And
59:01
so hopefully we get people that
59:04
support it and that want to
59:06
try and you know sometimes people
59:08
have a bad idea or feeling
59:10
about competition. They say, oh, it's
59:12
negative. And I think that's really
59:14
just our culture. Our culture, you
59:16
know, we go to the kids
59:18
football game and we see dad
59:20
over on the sideline cursing at
59:22
everybody and like, you know, telling
59:24
us kids better like score 20
59:26
touchdowns for that day. Versus, you
59:28
know, like, hey, it's all right,
59:31
you know, just have fun. play
59:33
with your friends, you know, do
59:35
the best that you can and
59:37
so on and so forth. And
59:39
this way, if we build this
59:41
community in love and respect and
59:43
inspiration and collaboration, I think that's
59:45
going to be a different environment.
59:47
So I've been offering this on
59:49
every channel that I've talked to.
59:51
I say, hey, look, if you
59:53
feel like competition is not the
59:55
way to go and it should
59:58
be done in love, then get
1:00:00
off your ass and bring the
1:00:02
love to the Yeah, yeah, that's
1:00:04
a good way to do it.
1:00:06
You know, like, don't, don't just
1:00:08
talk, be a keyboard warrior, like,
1:00:10
recognize what we're trying to do
1:00:12
is, again, community, collaboration, inspiration, and
1:00:14
then if you can stand behind
1:00:16
those, then come out and support
1:00:18
and be the change you want
1:00:20
to see, be the person that
1:00:22
helps add that extra light to
1:00:25
the room. And I made some
1:00:27
friends laugh recently. I said, like,
1:00:29
be a care bear because care,
1:00:31
you know, let's join hands in
1:00:33
the room and like let that
1:00:35
heart shine, you know, so don't
1:00:37
just talk about it from a
1:00:39
distance, come and help us out,
1:00:41
come and help us make a
1:00:43
new world. Because it's really funny,
1:00:45
if you look at all the
1:00:47
things that are happening right now,
1:00:49
this is, we are setting the
1:00:52
world up to be not, not
1:00:54
worldly. But cosmically, like we, we're
1:00:56
now talking about UAPs, we're now
1:00:58
talking about NHIs, well, we're now
1:01:00
talking about flying to the moon
1:01:02
and building things on the moon
1:01:04
and that's becoming like more of
1:01:06
a reality or Mars, that's becoming
1:01:08
more of a reality. And then
1:01:10
it's like, well, how do you
1:01:12
make that happen? Well, we gotta
1:01:14
have currency, we can't just fly
1:01:16
dollars all around the place. Yeah.
1:01:19
Oh, okay, well. What about a
1:01:21
digital currency? Just like we saw
1:01:23
in all these like old movies,
1:01:25
we do space fairing, you know,
1:01:27
communities, or they have like a,
1:01:29
you know, this type of money
1:01:31
that you can use anywhere in
1:01:33
any bar in the galaxy, you
1:01:35
know? And so it's like, whoa,
1:01:37
you know, it's kind of weird,
1:01:39
like you start, it's like we're
1:01:41
seeing the beginning of Star Wars
1:01:44
or Star Trek, you know, or
1:01:46
some of these movies, like how
1:01:48
we go from just being a
1:01:50
one planet. culture to multi-planet, multi-dimensional
1:01:52
culture. And what it takes for
1:01:54
that to happen, it takes for
1:01:56
our consciousness to raise, it takes
1:01:58
for our way of doing trade
1:02:00
and monetization to start changing. It
1:02:02
talks about... our world view expanding
1:02:04
beyond just our planet, like all
1:02:06
that stuff is happening right now.
1:02:08
Totally, man. Yeah, and if there
1:02:11
is anything to all of this
1:02:13
size stuff, which at this point
1:02:15
is so hard for me to
1:02:17
deny, we're kind of unveiling the
1:02:19
force too. We're sort of like,
1:02:21
it's indistinguishable from this notion of
1:02:23
the force, this like mysterious interconnected
1:02:25
thing that we're all tapped into
1:02:27
and some people have to be
1:02:29
able to tap into. You can
1:02:31
train yourself to tap into it
1:02:33
to some degree. It's super exciting.
1:02:35
I know you have very limited
1:02:38
time, but just for a fun
1:02:40
way to wrap this. Do you
1:02:42
have any anecdotes that stand out
1:02:44
to you as the most just
1:02:46
mind-blowing thing that you've experienced or
1:02:48
that you've seen firsthand with any
1:02:50
of the exploration that you've done?
1:02:52
Yeah. I went to Monroe, this
1:02:54
is probably one of the biggest,
1:02:56
you know, when I was a
1:02:58
kid I had several psychic moments,
1:03:00
pre-cognitive moments where I, one time
1:03:02
I dreamt a lotto, I told
1:03:05
my mom about it, she played
1:03:07
it locally but not nationally, it
1:03:09
came, the numbers came out nationally,
1:03:11
we would have been bazillionaires, we
1:03:13
probably wouldn't know each other because
1:03:15
I'd be on the beach somewhere
1:03:17
hanging out. So, um, And there
1:03:19
was several other instances that I've
1:03:21
done some really amazing things. It
1:03:23
just came up and popped up
1:03:25
in my mind. So there's that.
1:03:27
But the gateway was probably one
1:03:29
of the most concrete, very real
1:03:32
things. I had an entity come
1:03:34
to me while I was in
1:03:36
that and tell me some things.
1:03:38
And I was left there and
1:03:40
I was still trying to stay
1:03:42
objective. So I was like, maybe
1:03:44
that happened, maybe it didn't happen.
1:03:46
Well, come to follow, I end
1:03:48
up partaking in several different classes
1:03:50
after that. And there were these
1:03:52
individuals in those classes that had
1:03:54
psychic abilities or could tell you
1:03:56
things about your life and this
1:03:59
person. in one class tells me
1:04:01
the same thing that entity told
1:04:03
me, not knowing because I didn't
1:04:05
tell that story. And then I
1:04:07
met another person a few weeks
1:04:09
later who tells me the same
1:04:11
thing that entity told me. So
1:04:13
I'm not sure if I was
1:04:15
precognitive seeing what these people were
1:04:17
going to and I just tacked
1:04:19
on somewhere in my mind my
1:04:21
psyche this entity or if the
1:04:23
entity was telling me about what
1:04:26
I'm going to be in the
1:04:28
future and these people are confirming
1:04:30
that adding confirmation. Either way, that's
1:04:32
pretty mind blowing is pretty awakening.
1:04:34
It did happen. It is real.
1:04:36
So whether I'm precognating it or
1:04:38
whether it was. this actual entity.
1:04:40
It's very, it was very real.
1:04:42
And that happened after I was
1:04:44
with my, my friend Chris Bledsoe
1:04:46
for the first time and he
1:04:48
gave me an encounter with a
1:04:50
UAP and then a few days
1:04:53
later I went back and he,
1:04:55
we had, he facilitated another encounter
1:04:57
with UAP. So the thing I
1:04:59
would tell people anecdotally. is that
1:05:01
all of the systems that I
1:05:03
practice, gateway, remote viewing, mindsight, seeing
1:05:05
without your eyes, all the stuff,
1:05:07
all hinders on your intention and
1:05:09
attention. They all say the same
1:05:11
thing. Focus your intention, maintain attention
1:05:13
on that focus, right? And so
1:05:15
if I was to tell people.
1:05:17
something, I'd say really get strong
1:05:20
in those two things, right? And
1:05:22
then Joe McNacle says another one,
1:05:24
which is a third one, which
1:05:26
is expectation of outcome. Expect that
1:05:28
it's going to have the outcome
1:05:30
that you want it, right? Versus
1:05:32
expecting that it's not or kind
1:05:34
of being in the middle. Set
1:05:36
your intention. I want to communicate
1:05:38
with this or I want to
1:05:40
do this or whatever to maintain
1:05:42
your attention. and then expect that
1:05:44
it's going to be exactly the
1:05:47
way you intend it to be.
1:05:49
And then you will have probably
1:05:51
some really good results. and whatever
1:05:53
field you're dabbling in are working
1:05:55
in. Wow, wow. Man, I would
1:05:57
love to hear the story about
1:05:59
whatever you saw with Chris Belizzo,
1:06:01
but I know we're running very
1:06:03
low on time. Can you give
1:06:05
like the 30 second version? Yeah,
1:06:07
so the first time it was
1:06:09
way up in the sky and
1:06:11
it was flashing and it was
1:06:14
moving back and forth and side
1:06:16
to side and up and down
1:06:18
and it was nighttime. And it
1:06:20
was nighttime. So I was at
1:06:22
first, I was like, and I
1:06:24
had just met Chris. Is this
1:06:26
a. maybe it's a drone but
1:06:28
you know of course you can
1:06:30
hear a drone and it wasn't
1:06:32
so far up that I couldn't
1:06:34
hear it if it was a
1:06:36
drone so I was just like
1:06:39
I don't know I don't I'm
1:06:41
just not sure you know yeah
1:06:43
and so I kind of left
1:06:45
saying okay and one of the
1:06:47
things he told me was he
1:06:49
said hey look Just be positive,
1:06:51
just believe in the possibility that
1:06:53
this can happen and it'll happen.
1:06:55
But if you come in here
1:06:57
and you're like, I don't believe
1:06:59
this stuff, this guy's crazy, blah
1:07:01
blah blah, it'll never happen, it's
1:07:03
not real, then they probably not
1:07:06
going to show up. So he
1:07:08
warned me about that or gave
1:07:10
me that advice ahead of time.
1:07:12
Sure enough. The second time when
1:07:14
I was there, it actually appeared
1:07:16
in some trees ahead of me,
1:07:18
which made me feel like... It
1:07:20
definitely wasn't a, it definitely wasn't
1:07:22
a drone because, you know, drones
1:07:24
have a hard enough time flying
1:07:26
between trees during the day. So
1:07:28
at night, I felt that it
1:07:30
was, and it was this glowing
1:07:33
like orange orb. And in that
1:07:35
same time frame, off to my
1:07:37
right, another light pops up. And
1:07:39
I'm like, Chris, is that one?
1:07:41
You know, I was really excited.
1:07:43
And he said, no, that's my
1:07:45
neighbor. They have a house back
1:07:47
there. So either he was like.
1:07:49
the greatest sci opera ever, you
1:07:51
know, like, and he said all
1:07:53
of the elements to make me
1:07:55
believe, it's a big illusion, or
1:07:57
this was real. And so I
1:08:00
walked away, you know, not only
1:08:02
with his friendship and loving him
1:08:04
as a friend, but also knowing
1:08:06
that what I saw, I couldn't
1:08:08
explain, and if I was to
1:08:10
explain it, I would say it
1:08:12
was some sort of... And that
1:08:14
tells you. Now to finish off
1:08:16
that story in a really great
1:08:18
way, I'm sitting at Tom McNair's
1:08:20
house, one of the remote viewers
1:08:22
I told you about, and we're
1:08:24
discussing, Chris comes up in conversation.
1:08:27
And I'm like, he's like, oh
1:08:29
yeah, I heard about him. I
1:08:31
haven't read his book yet, but
1:08:33
I'm really curious, like, what was
1:08:35
your take? What we're talking about
1:08:37
now? So I explain these two
1:08:39
stories. And he's like, so tell
1:08:41
me more details. You know, this
1:08:43
guy is an ex-CIA operative who
1:08:45
was in the Army intelligence and
1:08:47
all this stuff. He was the
1:08:49
head of all this really high
1:08:51
level stuff in the CIA. So,
1:08:54
you know, he's all about details
1:08:56
and gathering information. And I'm like,
1:08:58
you know, Tom, I just can't
1:09:00
explain it in words. And right
1:09:02
at that exact moment, Mike, right
1:09:04
at that exact moment, my phone
1:09:06
buzzes, right? and I pull it
1:09:08
out in my pocket to see
1:09:10
who's texting me. I look at
1:09:12
it, it says Chris Bledsoe, I
1:09:14
open it up and it's a
1:09:16
recording of him at that exact
1:09:18
time filming a UAP in his
1:09:21
backyard. Hakem. Look, look what came
1:09:23
to see me today. Oh, it's
1:09:25
this, that other. He was like,
1:09:27
I just felt like I needed
1:09:29
to send this to you. He's
1:09:31
saying that. So either he had
1:09:33
a microphone at Tom McNair's house
1:09:35
and they're there. They're now in
1:09:37
cahoots playing this playing this playing
1:09:39
this game on this game on
1:09:41
me, right. There's something else going
1:09:43
on and I met him later
1:09:45
and I told him I said
1:09:48
dude you sent me that video
1:09:50
at just the right time Why
1:09:52
did he's why did you send
1:09:54
that one to me? He was
1:09:56
like, I don't know I just
1:09:58
felt like I needed to send
1:10:00
it to you and so I
1:10:02
did and I was like well
1:10:04
I was here's what was going
1:10:06
on I was trying to explain
1:10:08
it as do what it looked
1:10:10
like when you when I saw
1:10:12
you AP at your house And
1:10:15
right exactly as I was telling
1:10:17
him I didn't have the words
1:10:19
for it, you sent me that
1:10:21
video. And he was like, that's,
1:10:23
and he looks, he smiles, he
1:10:25
says, that's how the phenomenon works.
1:10:27
I was like, okay, okay. Yeah,
1:10:29
man. Wow, I love that. I
1:10:31
wish we had more time. I
1:10:33
could easily talk to you for
1:10:35
another hour, no problem. Well, we'll
1:10:37
have to do it again then.
1:10:39
Let's do it. Yeah, so much
1:10:42
more to ask you, man. But
1:10:44
okay, thanks for doing this. I'm
1:10:46
super stoked about everything you're doing
1:10:48
in Cy games. And yeah, let's
1:10:50
talk again. Yes, sir. Thank you
1:10:52
very much. Welcome to the post-mind-meld
1:10:54
synchronistic musings, my friends. Hope you
1:10:56
enjoyed that one. However abbreviated, Hakim
1:10:58
had really limited time. So anyway,
1:11:00
the synchronicity. As I'm recording this
1:11:02
one, I forget to turn off
1:11:04
my notifications. I see a text
1:11:06
from my friend Bob pop on
1:11:09
the screen. I don't see what
1:11:11
it is. I just dismiss it.
1:11:13
Of course, Hakim tells this... particularly
1:11:15
novel tale in a sea of
1:11:17
novel tales in this one. One
1:11:19
of my mentors Bill Ray, and
1:11:21
Bill was one of the remote
1:11:23
viewers too, and actually helped run
1:11:25
the program for a little while
1:11:27
as well. This guy said that
1:11:29
he had several encounters where he
1:11:31
bumped into these different types of
1:11:34
entities. And one, he believes that
1:11:36
the entity was... angel or cherubim
1:11:38
that was guarding the arc because
1:11:40
that's what he found out later
1:11:42
he was supposed to be looking
1:11:44
into. About this remote viewer viewing
1:11:46
the arc of the covenant as
1:11:48
part of a remote viewing assignment
1:11:50
and what you may not know
1:11:52
is there's a whole era in
1:11:54
the Fort Meade Army remote viewing
1:11:56
project where they are being told
1:11:58
to attempt to remote view a
1:12:01
number of anomalous things. I wish
1:12:03
I could remember who was in
1:12:05
charge of this. It wasn't the
1:12:07
main person in charge. There was
1:12:09
sort of a revolving door of
1:12:11
people at a point in this
1:12:13
project. It's really hard to keep
1:12:15
track of. All these stories are
1:12:17
in the great book Phenomena by
1:12:19
Anne. Jacobson. But anyway, there's one
1:12:21
character who's just having all of
1:12:23
these remote viewers attempt to view
1:12:25
all sorts of anomalous things. Underground,
1:12:28
UFO bases, things like the Ark
1:12:30
of the Covenant. I decided it
1:12:32
was worth actually dropping in here.
1:12:34
The figure that was doing the
1:12:36
anomalous targets was Ed Dames. He
1:12:38
had remote viewers at Fort Meade,
1:12:40
not only look up the arc
1:12:42
of the covenant, but things having
1:12:44
to do with Atlantis, UFOs, so
1:12:46
fun stuff, but definitely controversial stuff.
1:12:48
So anyway, Hakim tells this story,
1:12:50
obviously, tells the name, says it
1:12:52
was Bob Ray, who did this
1:12:55
remote viewing. I checked my text
1:12:57
after we're done recording. I have
1:12:59
this text from my friend Bob,
1:13:01
and it is an article. about
1:13:03
this remote viewing of the Ark
1:13:05
of the Covenant, it dropped on
1:13:07
the exact same day that Hakeem
1:13:09
and I spoke. So naturally I
1:13:11
kind of thought like, oh, Hakeem
1:13:13
must have seen this article. So
1:13:15
I messaged him and I'm like,
1:13:17
man, this is wild. Did you
1:13:19
know that this news story dropped?
1:13:22
Is that why this was on
1:13:24
your mind? And he said, no,
1:13:26
I didn't find out till later
1:13:28
either. And then we had a
1:13:30
laugh about, you know, he also
1:13:32
told that story during the podcast
1:13:34
to the effect of... the thing
1:13:36
Chris Bledsoe told him, I believe,
1:13:38
about how, man, that's just how
1:13:40
the phenomena works. And that was
1:13:42
my first thought, is just like,
1:13:44
God damn it, this is such
1:13:46
a mind-blowing example of just something
1:13:49
coming out of complete left field.
1:13:51
I mean, this is a pretty
1:13:53
woo story, even for me, this
1:13:55
remote viewing of the Ark of
1:13:57
the Covenant. So to have a
1:13:59
synchronicity on something so novel, just
1:14:01
really blew my mind. Okay. So,
1:14:03
the remote viewing idea I had
1:14:05
was, you may or may not
1:14:07
be familiar with Zenner cards, designed
1:14:09
by Carl Zenner and made famous
1:14:11
by the Parasycology. Trailblazer, J.B. Ryan,
1:14:13
the idea is that these are
1:14:16
cards that you can use to
1:14:18
test your ESP abilities. Essentially, they
1:14:20
consist of five different shapes. You
1:14:22
have a plus sign, a star,
1:14:24
wavy lines, a circle, and a
1:14:26
square. This, my friends, is one
1:14:28
of the five. I want you
1:14:30
to attempt to calm yourself, to
1:14:32
find it in your mind's eye.
1:14:34
What is this shape out of
1:14:36
the five that I just mentioned?
1:14:38
Drop it in the comments. We
1:14:40
will do a tabulation after a
1:14:43
week or so, and we will
1:14:45
see if the odds transcend chance.
1:14:47
Keep your peepers peeled on the
1:14:49
third eye drops YouTube page if
1:14:51
you want to see the result.
1:14:53
I will make a post. It
1:14:55
is going to stay right here
1:14:57
on my desk. Take your time.
1:14:59
Focus in. Which of those five
1:15:01
shapes is it? Again, remember, wavy
1:15:03
lines, star, circle, square, or plus
1:15:05
sign? Drop your answer in the
1:15:07
comments and I will give you
1:15:10
the answer in a post later
1:15:12
this week. All right, much love
1:15:14
until then, my friends.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More