Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
up on This Week in Space, we've got
0:02
a possible detection of life on an alien
0:04
planet 120 light -years away. There was an explosion
0:06
at a Northrop Grumman rocket test flight, and
0:08
we're talking about the Space Force! With
0:10
Chief Master Sargeant, John Bentavaneu is going
0:13
to tell us what that military branch really
0:15
does. Tune in. Podcasts
0:19
you love. From people you
0:21
trust. This
0:23
is truth. This
0:26
is this week in
0:28
space episode number 157
0:30
recorded on April 18th
0:33
2025 Space Force Hello and
0:35
welcome to another episode of this
0:37
week in space the wait for
0:39
it Space Force Edition No,
0:45
no. All right. All right.
0:47
I'm Rod Pyle, the long -suffering -in
0:49
-chief at Astro Magazine, and I'm
0:51
joined by that desktop space
0:53
warrior himself, Tark Malik, editor -in -chief
0:55
at space .com. Ahoy, ahoy. And
0:58
lone combatant. How are you,
1:00
sir? I'm doing well, Rod. Happy
1:02
Easter preview, Easter episode.
1:04
Yeah. How are you? Easter,
1:07
we'll call it. Yeah. In a few
1:09
minutes we'll be joined by Chief Master Sergeant
1:11
John Bendevena of the US Space Force,
1:13
which is going to be fun. He's
1:15
a really interesting guy, great to chat
1:17
with. And he's going to
1:19
educate us all about Space Force because
1:21
I, for one, didn't know nearly
1:23
as much about it as I should.
1:25
But before we do that, Please,
1:28
you know what's coming. Don't forget to
1:30
do us a solid make sure to
1:32
like subscribe and other things on our
1:34
various podcast venues because We're counting on
1:36
you so we can keep
1:39
doing this fantastic show
1:41
Okay Now a
1:43
space joke from our good
1:45
friend of the show listener
1:48
Ken Kramer. Hey, I just
1:50
saw Ken. Okay. Yes. Yeah,
1:52
I can yes. Yeah, I Saw
1:54
him at the conference. I was at it neif Different
1:56
Ken Kramer. Oh a different Ken. Yeah,
1:59
sorry. No, maybe I'll say
2:01
you too soon Ken Okay, why
2:04
did the Space Force Guardian get in trouble
2:06
for bringing a pet to the space station? I
2:09
don't know why because he let
2:11
his dog tag along for
2:13
the launch It's
2:21
good. Now, I've heard that some people
2:24
want to make us into dog tags when
2:26
it's joke time in the show, but
2:28
you can help by sending us your best
2:30
worst in that case, or it's a
2:32
different space joke, at twist .tv.
2:34
And I have to tell you,
2:36
Tarte, our listeners...
2:39
I maybe they're upset with us
2:41
because we haven't heard much in terms
2:43
of space jokes. There's a few
2:45
that are pretty consistent. And by
2:47
the way, if you're looking in
2:49
Bennett surfs 101 best space jokes, which
2:51
I don't think exists, or on
2:53
AI, we've seen those.
2:55
So we're kind of looking for original
2:57
stuff. Maybe you heard your dad
2:59
years ago, or maybe you You've
3:02
made it up yourself. Those are the best ones. So,
3:04
So. Yeah,
3:07
let's step it up guys.
3:09
He says we're depending on you.
3:12
That's what I meant to say. We love you.
3:14
We're depending on you. Get into program. That's in
3:16
order. All right. Headlines. Yes.
3:20
It's alive. Headline
3:23
please. Oh, I missed it again. All
3:27
right, Miss Australia 1959
3:29
It's alive. So we
3:31
have stories rippling through
3:34
the press of possible
3:36
life signatures found at
3:38
the Sun so conquest
3:40
of space exoplanet k2 -18b
3:42
Which is a suspected
3:44
ocean or high sea in as they call
3:46
them world in a habitable zone about a
3:48
hundred and A little over a hundred
3:50
light years away. 120. That's
3:53
fairly over a hundred, isn't it?
3:55
Thought to be about two and a
3:57
half times the size of Earth. Notably,
4:00
although this story got a
4:03
lot of pushback from certain
4:05
outlets, mostly other science folks.
4:08
Notably, this was the
4:10
second indication in a couple
4:12
of years of the same
4:14
signature. So just indulge me for a
4:16
moment. These are possible
4:18
signs of life and emphasis on
4:21
possible found in the spectra of
4:23
this exoplanet as it transited its
4:25
host star. And
4:27
these are spectrographic signatures
4:30
of dimethyl sulfide, DMS, and
4:33
dimethyl disulfide, which
4:35
on earth are produced by algae
4:37
and other microbes. Now, it's thought
4:39
that this can also be abiotically
4:41
produced, i .e. without life, but
4:44
Due to the amount of what they
4:46
found, they think they found of the atmosphere,
4:48
which is a few million, I think
4:50
a few million times what's found on earth.
4:52
Let's see. On earth,
4:55
we got a lot of plankton and algae
4:57
on earth. It's below one part per billion. And
5:00
on this planet, they
5:02
think it's 10
5:04
parts per million, which is
5:06
a huge differential. So,
5:10
you know, hope springs eternal that we may have found
5:12
life elsewhere, but They
5:14
the the science team themselves who
5:16
I'm hoping will get on the
5:18
show said they need a few
5:20
more hours of observing time on
5:22
the Web space telescope to confirm and
5:24
I imagine that's pretty hard to get
5:27
Yeah, yeah, what a day to take
5:29
the day off and take your daughter
5:31
to the Smithsonian Museum That's where I
5:33
was yesterday when this was all happening
5:35
and people were calling me won't hey
5:37
Hey, where's this story? Here's the story
5:40
on space .com. Yeah, that's right. I was
5:42
I was just getting up from my
5:44
lunch at Shake Shack at the museum
5:46
when Rod is like, hey, what's going
5:48
on with the story? So there is
5:50
no rest for the weary space. All
5:52
right. I did
5:54
see discovery for the first time, though,
5:56
at the at the Udvar 80 Center.
5:59
uh that was the first one I saw
6:01
discovery since it flew last it was really
6:03
nice to see because it's been 14
6:05
years but anyway um this is exciting but
6:07
like you just said like we have
6:09
to be really skeptical because this was the
6:11
James Webb Space Telescope you know is
6:13
what they used to look at it you
6:15
would expect that if anything
6:17
that is used or launched
6:19
by NASA or its partners
6:21
finds actual evidence of life
6:23
that NASA themselves would help
6:25
announce it. Well, and
6:27
talk about a way of restoring
6:29
your science budget if it gets
6:31
cut. mean, really. Yeah, yeah. But
6:33
it is, I
6:36
guess I would say hopeful. Because as
6:38
you mentioned, this isn't a new planet
6:41
Kepler K2 -18b has been in the
6:43
talks for the last few years about
6:45
its potential to be a habitable
6:47
planet. I think you and I have
6:50
different size estimates for it. I
6:52
have it pegged at nearly nine times
6:54
more massive than Earth, but more
6:56
mass. I said size. Oh, size. Okay.
6:58
There you go. Yeah. And
7:00
so, so, you know, it is
7:02
I think a bit encouraging that this
7:04
relatively new instrument that we've been
7:07
less than four years old with the
7:09
James Webb Space Telescope has looked
7:11
at it in a different way to
7:13
find what is a bit more
7:15
promising presence of this DMS chemical itself.
7:17
Now we've actually had a few
7:20
stories on this since 2023. In fact,
7:22
we had one earlier this year
7:24
in March about how tantalizingly attractive this
7:26
planet is to host life, but
7:28
how we just still can't say conclusively
7:30
one way or another. My only
7:32
concern is that this ends up like
7:35
the methane on Mars, which there's
7:37
like a camp that says it has
7:39
to be made by a biological
7:41
substance. And then another camp
7:43
that says no, like you
7:45
just said earlier, there are
7:47
non -biological processes to make this
7:49
chemical signature. And we won't really
7:51
know about Mars until we actually go there. Going
7:54
to K2 -18B, a lot harder,
7:57
a lot harder than going to
7:59
Mars to confirm. what it's going
8:01
to be. So my hope is
8:03
that we'll be able to get
8:05
some more conclusive evidence to say
8:07
one way or another what it
8:09
is that will be undeniable in
8:11
the signal from either James Webb
8:13
or another equivalent that can help
8:15
put it to bed a lot
8:17
more simply. So it's not like
8:19
this, you know, won't
8:21
they type of situation
8:23
on an alien planet for
8:26
years to come. Well,
8:28
and just a life on Viking
8:31
situation, you know, well, I
8:33
was going to say, yeah, another similar
8:35
story was when the Viking landers
8:37
went down 1976 within short order. They
8:39
had they had their
8:41
manipulator arms, which were very interesting
8:43
design, but I won't go into
8:45
it. Go out, take soil samples,
8:47
dump them into a trio of
8:49
life science experiments. And one of
8:51
them showed positive spike and the
8:53
others didn't. And after a lot
8:55
of battle between the head of
8:57
the of the life science project
8:59
on that mission and one of
9:01
the PIs on a particular experiment. There's
9:05
a lot of acrimony between those two. In
9:07
fact, they almost went to blows at one
9:10
point, had to be pulled back by others. The
9:13
guy who ran it was
9:15
a pretty starch collar kind
9:17
of scientist, but you guard
9:19
your special interests. Is that
9:21
good or bad to have a starch collar? In
9:24
his case, he was just really
9:26
tightly wound and saw things his
9:28
way. And this
9:30
is 1976, so people
9:32
are looking at all
9:34
this exobiological life science through the lens of
9:36
what we knew in 1976, which is very different
9:38
than now. But my
9:40
point here being, the results
9:43
of that experiment are still
9:45
being debated. We think it
9:47
was perchlorates. in the soil
9:49
reacting in a non -biological way, but nobody
9:51
really knows. And more
9:53
recent tests of that experiment
9:56
on Earth in places like
9:58
the Atacama and with artificially prepared
10:00
simulant seem to
10:02
indicate that it might have actually found something, but we
10:04
won't know for a long time. But
10:06
let's move on. Glam is
10:08
getting slammed for the flight
10:11
of Blue Origin NS -31. the
10:13
oft referred to
10:15
glam flight the first
10:17
build widely as the first all
10:19
-female mission since Valentina Tereshkova in
10:21
1963 which was a little bit
10:23
of a headline stretch for me
10:25
because when you say all -female for
10:27
Valentina Tereshkova it's easy to be
10:29
all -female when you're the only
10:32
person only person on the capsule
10:34
yeah but you know it's a
10:36
relevant point so a crew of
10:38
very high -profile media
10:40
figures went up and came back
10:42
and had their 11 minutes
10:44
of flight and, you know, four
10:46
to six minutes of weightlessness
10:48
in the parabola suborbital. I
10:52
like how you danced around the fact that
10:54
they launched Katy Perry to space, you
10:56
know. Well, God knows you've addressed it enough,
10:58
but here's the problem, you know, it's,
11:01
it is, if you're just
11:03
talking about bare facts with no
11:05
embellishment or set dressing, This
11:08
was a tourist flight. Now. Yes.
11:10
Sometimes science is performed on these
11:12
suborbital hops. Sometimes some
11:14
important stuff comes out
11:16
of it. This was, I
11:18
think, by design primarily
11:21
done for public relations, for
11:23
advancing the cause of women and STEM, for
11:25
a number of things which matter. But
11:28
here's where the controversy got stood
11:30
up because people were just going
11:33
nuts on social media. They
11:35
still are. On the one side
11:37
we've got people saying these people aren't
11:39
astronauts and that's an old conversation
11:41
and this is just a stunt blah
11:43
blah blah blah and then we've
11:45
got on the other side people including
11:47
a lot of very well -intentioned intelligent
11:49
women saying look this is a
11:51
big step forward for STEM and so
11:53
forth so you know there's a certain
11:55
validity to points of the arguments on
11:57
both sides but it really got very
11:59
heated up and kind of nasty
12:02
very quickly which I expected
12:04
some of that, but not to that degree.
12:06
What did you think? You've
12:08
heard me talk about this for
12:10
the last few episodes about how surprised
12:13
I was at the severe backlash
12:15
because it is very unique to this
12:17
flight in terms of both its
12:19
veracity, its amplification,
12:22
as well as opposed to the other
12:24
10. crewed flights. I think this
12:26
was the 11th crewed flight, right, for
12:28
Blue Origin that they did, including the
12:30
one that Jeff Bezos
12:32
launched on. But,
12:34
you know, as you said, I
12:36
mean, the fact that this was
12:38
largely a promotional flight in Blue
12:40
Origins. aspect really was crystallized
12:42
in the post -flight interviews in which
12:45
I believe that Katy Perry was asked
12:47
if she recommended it and of course
12:49
she did. She recommended it, gave it
12:51
a 10 out of 10, and felt
12:53
that everyone should do it. And that's
12:55
Blue Origin's ad right there. Katy Perry
12:57
says you should go to space. But
13:00
most of us can't afford it. You have
13:02
to put $150 ,000 down. just to
13:04
ask how much it cost to do a ticket.
13:06
And Blue Origin will not tell you what the ticket prices
13:08
are. But that's
13:11
a whole industry look
13:13
at it. This was essentially a
13:15
tourist flight. I believe Amanda,
13:17
when the bio -astronauts engineer and
13:19
activist on the flight, I think
13:21
that she did do two
13:24
experiments, she said, while she was
13:26
on the flight, either that
13:28
she took with her or whatnot
13:30
in the interview. But
13:33
the blowback has been very, very
13:36
audible. In fact, I was just
13:38
reading another story I believe in
13:40
the Times today in their culture
13:42
section about kind of what a
13:44
waste a time it was and,
13:46
you know, everyone fawning over
13:48
11 minutes of space travel and whatnot.
13:50
It's still very surprising to me.
13:53
In fact, some of the the
13:55
YouTubers I follow who only cover movies
13:57
were covering this flight about how much
13:59
they hated it, which was really surprising
14:01
to me. So, know, I get
14:03
the criticism that this was a tourist flight
14:05
and it was baited out to be more than
14:07
it was. Katy Perry and
14:09
Gale King kissing the ground, you
14:12
know, thankful to be back on earth after
14:14
11 minutes, could be a little bit much,
14:16
right? Considering that, what? the
14:19
astronauts, the Starliner astronauts were up
14:22
there for eight months, you
14:24
know, over over over eight months
14:26
planned. So, you know,
14:28
and they were criticized for having their designer
14:30
spacesuits to or flight suits, the months
14:32
flight suits. Can I make a comment on
14:34
that? You know, yeah, they didn't do
14:36
themselves any favors with some of the
14:38
PR. Yeah, with the L. You mean the
14:41
L cover? For glam and
14:43
space. Yeah, I mean well and and
14:45
the poses after before and after
14:47
you know those suits were I
14:50
mean, they were I think standard blue origin
14:52
suits, but no, no, they're not that
14:54
blue origin ones are made out of polyester
14:56
Yeah, and they and they and they're
14:58
they're they're made out of you know They're
15:00
they're made out of kind of jumped
15:02
a polyester jumpsuit. Yeah material. These are made
15:05
out of a stretch flame resistant neoprene
15:07
That are that are that are tailored specifically.
15:09
Okay. I thought they
15:11
looked a little better than before. Yeah,
15:14
got flared they got flared flared
15:16
pant legs They've they're they're designed to
15:18
be a much more comfortable and whatnot.
15:20
Well, and as a fashion statement, exactly,
15:22
I would say, which may not have been,
15:24
I mean, you just have to know
15:26
when you're going into these things, why they
15:28
didn't ask you and I, I just
15:30
am not sure. Right. You have to know
15:32
going into these things. I'm a wonderful
15:34
personality. I don't know about you. Never
15:37
done. That you're, you
15:39
know, you're painting a target on your
15:41
back and it's just tough. So, you
15:43
know, I hope this simmers down. and
15:45
that the maximum benefit can be
15:48
extracted from it, but probably no time
15:50
soon. All right. And
15:52
we have some, I guess, relatively
15:54
breaking news about the explosion with
15:56
Northrop Grumman. That's awful. Exactly.
15:59
Yeah. Yeah. Yesterday
16:01
or actually Wednesday, there was an
16:03
explosion at Northrop Grumman's test
16:05
site out in Promontory, Utah, which
16:07
we just got some photos
16:09
from the sheriff's department out there
16:11
and it fully destroyed. one
16:13
of their buildings out there. And
16:16
of course, this is where
16:18
Northrop Grumman tests their solid rocket
16:20
motors, the ones that they
16:22
built for the space shuttle, the big ones
16:24
that they're building for SLS. But
16:26
there isn't any word about what was going on at
16:28
the building there, but we do know there were no
16:30
injuries, no fatalities. So at
16:32
least there's that to be thankful
16:34
for. But it is curious
16:36
to kind of find out what was going
16:38
on there. Seem
16:41
like any Artemis hardware for at
16:43
least the next two flights
16:45
we were affected because Artemis 2
16:47
they've stacked it already And
16:49
which launches next year in 2026
16:51
as we're recording this and
16:53
I believe they've already completed or
16:55
shipped the segments for For
16:57
Artemis 3 as well. So So,
17:00
you know, it is just
17:02
kind of something that we know
17:04
happened They're gonna look into it They've lost
17:06
an entire building, what building that was, we
17:08
don't know, and what the,
17:10
you know, the extent of... the blowback
17:12
or the setbacks that it might
17:14
create for their solid rocket motor industry,
17:17
you know, we're not sure. They
17:19
make more than the SRBs, you know,
17:21
they make motors for missiles and
17:23
all of that type of thing as
17:25
well. So, you know, it's unclear,
17:27
but clearly something went very, very wrong.
17:30
And I think it's just good
17:32
to know that no one was at
17:34
least injured in it. And then hopefully they'll get
17:36
to the bottom of what happened and avoid that from happening
17:38
again. Yeah, that
17:40
would be good. All right. Well, we are
17:42
going to go to a quick break
17:44
and We are going to be back
17:46
in just a moment with Chief
17:48
Master Sergeant John Benevena of the
17:51
US Space Force stay with us
17:53
Missions to
17:55
Mars driverless cars AI
17:57
chatbots feels like we're already living
17:59
in the future Well Robin Hood is
18:01
built for the future of trading Robin
18:04
Hood's intuitive design makes trading seamless
18:06
Spot opportunities and take control
18:08
of your trades with tools like
18:10
screeners, simulated returns, and strategy
18:12
builder. On Robinhood, traders have access
18:14
to hundreds of popular stocks
18:17
and ETFs, 24 hours a day, five
18:19
days a week, so you can keep up
18:21
with today's fast -paced markets. You
18:23
can now even trade stocks and crypto
18:25
all in one place with the new
18:27
desktop platform Robinhood Legend. The future
18:29
of trading is fast, powerful,
18:31
and precise. Experience it
18:33
now on Robinhood. Investing is
18:35
risky. Robinhood Financial LLC, member SIPC,
18:37
is a registered broker -dealer. Trading
18:40
during extended hours involves additional risks.
18:42
Cryptocurrency services are offered through an
18:44
account with Robinhood Crypto LLC and
18:46
an LSID 1702840. Robinhood Crypto is
18:48
licensed to engage in virtual currency
18:50
business activity by the New York
18:53
State Department of Financial Services. Imagine
18:55
a business owner relying on a
18:57
dozen different software programs. Each one
18:59
disconnected, more expensive, and more complicated
19:01
than the last. It can
19:03
be incredibly stressful, right? Now,
19:06
picture Odu. Odu brings all the
19:08
tools your business needs into
19:10
one simple platform. CRM,
19:12
accounting, inventory,
19:14
manufacturing, marketing, HR,
19:16
and more. All
19:18
seamlessly connected. Everything works
19:20
together, giving you the peace of mind
19:23
that your business is running smoothly from
19:25
every angle. Odu's open source
19:27
applications are user -friendly and designed
19:29
to scale with your business, saving
19:31
you time and money. Say
19:33
goodbye to juggling multiple platforms and
19:35
hello to efficient integrated management.
19:38
Stop wasting resources on complicated systems and
19:40
make the switch to Odu today. Visit
19:43
Odu .com O -D -O -O dot
19:45
com and discover how Odu
19:47
can simplify and streamline your
19:49
business operations. Odu.
19:52
Modern management made simple. Raise
19:57
the sails! Raise the
19:59
sails! Captain, an unidentified ship
20:01
is approaching. Over. Roger,
20:03
wait. Is that an
20:05
enterprise sales solution? Reach
20:07
sales professionals, not professional
20:09
sailors. With LinkedIn ads,
20:11
you can target the right people
20:13
by industry, job title and more.
20:15
We'll even give you a $100
20:18
credit on your next campaign. Get
20:20
started today at linkedin .com slash
20:22
results. Terms and conditions apply. And
20:27
we are back with Chief Master
20:29
Sergeant John Bentivania, and I've always
20:31
wanted to say that, Chief Master
20:33
Sergeant of the US Space Force. John,
20:36
thank you for joining us today. Hello. Thanks
20:38
for having me. I appreciate it. I'm excited. So
20:41
just for me, because I'm a
20:43
total moron when it comes to military, you can
20:45
tell I never served. What does
20:47
a Chief Master Sergeant do? What
20:49
is that role? So my
20:51
official title is Chief Master
20:53
Sergeant of the Space Force. So
20:55
I am the most senior
20:58
enlisted member of the service. And I have
21:00
counterparts like the Sergeant Major of the Army, the
21:02
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy. So
21:05
all of the services have a senior
21:07
enlisted that work directly for the service
21:09
chief, or in my particular case, I work
21:11
for the Chief of Space Operations directly, General
21:14
Salsman. So in my role,
21:16
you know, I've been doing this for almost
21:18
31 years. You know, I
21:20
take my kind of military
21:22
experience, my space operations experience, and
21:24
I advise General Salsman on
21:26
the development, the employment. and
21:29
the strategy to make sure that guardians,
21:31
I call it the guardian experience, that
21:33
guardians in the United States Space Force
21:36
have an experience that they feel valued,
21:38
that they're challenged, they're developed, and
21:40
really to kind of get after the needs of
21:42
the nation. So I provide them primarily on a
21:44
lot of enlisted stuff, but I like
21:46
to say that my responsibility doesn't stop at
21:48
stripes, whether you're wearing stars, whether you're
21:50
wearing stripes, or whether you're wearing a suit
21:52
as a civilian, I'm concerned about
21:54
your experience as a guardian. So those are some
21:57
the things I advise them on. Okay.
22:01
And Chief, I mean, I'm just
22:03
curious about you yourself as like a
22:05
person because, you know, I was
22:07
reading your bio. I know that you,
22:09
I guess you joined the Air
22:11
Force in 94 or at least entered
22:13
the Academy in 94, but the
22:15
Space Force is much younger than
22:17
that. I think you shifted over in
22:20
2020. So I'm curious what that
22:22
path was like. for you as a
22:24
member of the service. I
22:27
mean, was that always an
22:29
ambition as a youth to
22:31
enter service or the Air
22:33
Force was attractive? And then, of course, space was started.
22:35
What was that path like for you? Yeah,
22:37
so I tell the story that, you
22:39
know, Kuanas, it was early 90s when
22:42
I enlisted into the United States Air
22:44
Force. There was the
22:46
patriotism that was involved in that,
22:48
but also I was trying to
22:50
make something of myself. You
22:52
know, my kind of personal story, I got married in
22:55
the month of May and went to boot camp in
22:57
August, so only a couple of months later. So
22:59
I tell General Salsman, who's a
23:01
phenomenal, phenomenal teammate, that though he may
23:03
be a four -star general, my wife,
23:05
Kathy, outranks him just by time
23:08
and grade. But
23:10
I enlisted and I did it for four
23:12
years because I wanted to try and make something
23:14
myself. But, you know,
23:16
I tell the story that that initial four
23:18
-year contract, if you will, as an enlisted
23:20
member, wound up turning into
23:23
a lifetime commitment. I just really enjoyed
23:25
serving. I enjoyed the challenges that service
23:27
provided me, allowed me to do things
23:29
I never had a chance to. I
23:31
thought I would do. And
23:33
so I stayed in. And when I first came
23:35
in, I was a maintainer, actually. You know,
23:37
I worked on test equipment for the United States
23:39
Air Force and did that for a
23:41
couple of years. but then transitioned into
23:43
being an enlisted space operator. And
23:46
in 98, I went to tech school
23:48
out in Vandenberg at the time Air
23:50
Force Base and learned how to do
23:52
space operations and got into the space
23:55
business. And my first job was watching
23:57
dots for the DSP, the Defense
23:59
Support Program, out at
24:01
Buckley Air National Guard Base at the
24:03
time, back in the late 90s. And
24:05
that started my space career. And I
24:08
love having a chance to do that
24:10
for many, many years. So
24:12
when the Space Force was established, Since
24:15
I've been doing space operations in
24:17
the United States Air Force, the transition
24:19
opportunity to continue that work that
24:21
I believed in, but also
24:23
the challenge and opportunity to stand up
24:25
a new service and help build a
24:27
foundation for generations of guardians to
24:29
come. I jumped at the chance
24:31
and to your point, it was 1 September
24:33
of 2020 that I transitioned over and
24:35
that was the first day that we
24:38
were authorized to do the transition. So
24:40
myself and several hundred of my closest
24:42
friends who are all doing space operations
24:44
all transitioned on 1 September 2020. Well,
24:46
that's awesome. And when you were choosing
24:48
to enlist, I mean... pick the
24:50
Air Force? I guess at that at that beginning
24:52
I mean if there were other services was there
24:54
like a family tradition or was it like
24:56
the one branch that really grabbed you? Which
24:59
is something you were always interested in since
25:01
you were a kid. Yeah, so
25:03
actually it was a little bit of
25:05
what opportunities Kind of we're out
25:07
there. I my father was
25:09
a Marine in World War two You know,
25:11
I have other family members that served in
25:13
the army and other branches But for me
25:15
personally what I was looking to I was
25:18
looking at for kind of
25:20
a skill and something interested me and all
25:22
the services have their unique culture and
25:24
really write ethos that they build and it
25:26
was what the Air Force, I
25:28
was a precision measurement equipment laboratory technician, PMAL,
25:30
that's what they call it. And when I
25:32
talked to the Air Force recruiter and he
25:34
gave me this name and kind of taught
25:37
that what I would do and I called
25:39
my father at the time and I said,
25:41
hey dad, I talked to the Air Force
25:43
recruiter today and this is a job that
25:45
he said that I could do and go to school for and he
25:47
goes, take it. That's a great job. You
25:49
know, you learn a skill. You're really going
25:51
to enjoy working in the laboratory, uh, calibrating
25:53
test equipment. And, and that's kind of, that's
25:55
kind of what got me into the Air Force
25:57
originally. That's awesome. So
26:00
I have first a selfish personal question and
26:02
then I'll get to this back to the
26:04
show. Uh, where, uh, first of all, you
26:06
don't look nearly old enough to have a
26:08
father who was in World War II. I
26:10
mean, my father was World War II era.
26:12
So kudos to your good genes. Uh,
26:14
where was he deployed in the, uh, Yeah,
26:19
so my father when he served it
26:21
was later later in the war
26:23
so he was part of the you
26:25
know quote -unquote occupation force that was
26:27
in Japan so a lot of
26:29
the photographs that I have you know
26:31
my father passed you know years
26:33
ago but you know most of the
26:35
photographs are him you know working
26:37
in kind of the police occupation occupation
26:40
force around Japan and Tokyo when
26:42
he served later on in the war
26:44
and then came back but I
26:46
mean, about a time he got in, you
26:48
know, most of the combat in the
26:50
Pacific was already over. That
26:53
was probably a good thing. So
26:55
what was your first reaction when you heard
26:57
the announcement about the Space Force being
27:00
stood up? Because it was kind of a,
27:02
you know, we had heard some inklings of it,
27:04
but it's like, what is this? And, you
27:06
know, gee, the way the way it was described
27:08
in some circles was we're going to have Yeah,
27:11
guardians and tie fighters slugging it out
27:13
with the bad guys in space and in
27:15
other circles was a little more temperate
27:18
of, you know, we're basically going to be
27:20
observing satellites and protecting our interests and
27:22
orbit and so forth. Yeah,
27:24
it was exciting because as you
27:26
know, right, there was, you know, Washington
27:30
was a little undecided on where we
27:32
were to go, whether or not we could
27:34
afford it and whether or not there
27:36
was momentum and understanding, if you will, whether
27:39
not we needed a separate service. So when we
27:41
finally got the word and that it was going
27:43
to happen, I was pretty excited
27:45
because I said, I've been doing this
27:47
work for a while and I was fortunate
27:49
enough to kind of see the
27:51
evolution of where we were going
27:53
in the domain and that from
27:55
a military perspective, that
27:57
there were some concerning activities
27:59
that were happening, specifically for
28:02
some of our competitors, that
28:04
were making it, you know, a war -fighting domain.
28:06
And I can say that freely now, you
28:08
know, the space is war -fighting domain
28:11
as an independent service, but... spent many
28:13
years doing space operations and seeing what
28:15
was happening. I
28:17
think it was back
28:19
in 2007, maybe, when China
28:21
first did that ASAP
28:23
when they blew up the
28:26
funk weather satellite. And
28:28
some other activities, whether it
28:30
be ground -based lasers, jammers, experiencing
28:32
that and seeing it for so
28:34
many years, but being able
28:36
to talk about it in the open, but
28:39
also educating the public and our elected
28:41
officials that hey like there's some concerning
28:43
things happening there and it was kind
28:45
of an acknowledgement when the service was
28:47
stood up and which really allowed us
28:49
to kind of have this discussion and
28:51
allow us to as a as a
28:53
separate service now to really focus on
28:55
that because I believe in it you
28:57
know when I when I talk about you
28:59
know our mission statement right secure our nation's
29:01
interests in from our two space. I
29:04
think that's really important. And I get
29:06
the opportunity to engage and talk to
29:08
youth. I try to go to schools
29:10
when I can and talk to whoever
29:12
will give me an opportunity to talk
29:14
about what we need to do. And
29:17
I do that not because I'm trying
29:19
to recruit people into uniform, but
29:21
I do it because I
29:24
say that the domain, our
29:26
opportunities, the potential that space
29:28
provides is unlimited and that
29:30
as a service, right? Freedom of
29:32
maneuver and access to space. So
29:34
I say this so that explorers
29:36
can explore, dreamers can dream,
29:38
innovators can innovate. I just want
29:41
to play my role as a guardian, because I
29:43
know that it's a contested domain. But I want
29:45
to make sure that we have the ability to
29:47
take advantage of it. I mean, it's just kind
29:49
of amazing when you think about where we are.
29:51
You know, I use the analogy. My
29:54
wife and I went on a cruise out
29:56
of Miami last year, went out into
29:58
Caribbean into international waters. And I say, I
30:00
was not standing on the side of the
30:02
boat with binoculars, right, fearful of pirates
30:05
coming on the boat. Because I knew
30:07
that the Navy of the world led by
30:09
the US Navy were protecting and you
30:11
know, sea lanes of transit and
30:13
commerce. That allowed me to take
30:15
a vacation. It allowed the company to invest
30:17
and build the boat. It allowed individuals
30:19
who are making a career to work
30:21
on the boat. And for that
30:23
whole economic right and way of life
30:25
to exist. I want individuals when
30:28
they think about the space force and our
30:30
ability to travel, take advantage of whether
30:32
be tourism, space cargo, travel
30:34
out beyond the moon to Mars,
30:37
and say that we're able to do
30:39
that because the guardians of the
30:41
space force secure the nation's interests
30:43
from into space. So
30:45
all that wrapped up when the service stood
30:47
up, that's what I'm thinking about. I'm excited
30:49
to be part of it. Very
30:51
well put, sir. We will be right back
30:53
after the short break with Tarik's next
30:56
burning question. Stand by. 25
30:59
years ago, a small group of business
31:01
and government leaders met in Washington,
31:03
DC. They envisioned the
31:05
creation of an independent, non -profit
31:07
organization with a mission to help
31:09
people businesses and government mitigate
31:11
the growing threat of cyber attacks.
31:14
Today, the Center for Internet Security embodies
31:16
that vision. For 25 years,
31:19
it's worked with a global
31:21
community of IT and cybersecurity
31:23
experts to develop the CIS
31:25
benchmarks and CIS critical security
31:27
controls. These proven security
31:29
best practices defend against common
31:31
cyber threats and compliance
31:33
with industry frameworks, regulations
31:35
and standards. Today
31:37
CIS provides cyber security services,
31:39
threat intelligence and critical resources
31:41
to help public and private
31:44
sector organizations alike strengthen their
31:46
cyber defenses. Visit
31:48
CISecurity .org today that's the letters
31:50
C, I, Security .org to
31:52
find out how CIS can
31:54
help your organization as we
31:56
create confidence in the connected
31:58
world. Well
32:01
Chief, you know, I think you actually got
32:04
my question coming up ahead of time
32:06
because as we're speaking, no, it's quite
32:08
all right. As we're speaking,
32:10
the Space Force just celebrated its fifth
32:12
anniversary, fifth birthday, if you will. And
32:15
I guess you're coming up on
32:18
your five -year anniversary later this
32:20
year. Then congratulations ahead for that. And
32:23
there might be some folks who
32:25
don't really understand what it is.
32:28
that the space force as a branch
32:30
does and you touched on a
32:32
bit of them but you know what
32:34
I guess just for the folks
32:36
that maybe aren't as either as versed
32:38
or as you know they just
32:40
not as attentive in just how the
32:42
military works what is it that
32:44
the the the space force itself it
32:47
really you know, aims at either
32:49
safeguarding in terms of assets for civilian
32:51
use, military use, and,
32:53
you know, I guess what gets
32:55
you going to work every morning
32:57
to oversee all of your responsibilities there? Yeah,
33:00
absolutely. So
33:02
what gets me up every day are the
33:04
guardians and their families. Like, you know, these
33:06
men and women who are doing the things
33:08
that they do, serving, wearing
33:10
a cloth of our nation and
33:12
making the sacrifices. and accepting
33:14
the challenges that, you know, what service means,
33:16
so it's the men and women that get
33:18
me up every day. But
33:21
from the service perspective, you know, the things that
33:23
I believe in that they're doing, right, I'm sitting
33:25
in an office and I'm having a chance to
33:27
hang out with you guys, right, in an afternoon.
33:29
They're out working in windowless rooms, taking care of
33:31
the nation's business. But what is that, to
33:34
your point, right, from the space force perspective? So
33:36
we kind of bucket this three core
33:38
functions, if you will, within the space
33:40
force. The one is
33:43
assured space access. You know,
33:45
that's, you know, us, our ability to be
33:47
able to have national security launches, you know,
33:49
at Cape Canaveral slash Patrick last year, I
33:51
think we had 93 launches where we're to
33:53
break 100 this year. I know it, you
33:55
know, we have the, you know, on the
33:57
West Coast, we have Vanderbilt Space Force Base, you
34:00
know, we have tracking stations that
34:02
enable and help right launch, right? So
34:04
assured space access, you know, not
34:06
only is it vital from a national
34:08
security perspective, but from a financial
34:11
perspective, we want to have a robust space
34:13
industry within the United States. And
34:16
the ranges and our ability to provide that
34:18
infrastructure, you know, range of the future going out,
34:20
you know, you know, the direction that we're
34:22
going. So that's one of the
34:24
core functions that we do, assured space access.
34:27
One the other things we do is global
34:30
space operations. So, and that's something that
34:32
a lot of it I did as well
34:34
as an airman for many years, and that's your
34:36
make sure that GPS, right,
34:38
position navigation and timing, that entire
34:40
constellation, right, that entire ecosystem. is
34:42
owned and executed by the Space
34:44
Force, Guardians of Space Force. Right
34:46
now, there were young guardians
34:48
sitting in the windows room at
34:50
Shriver Space Force Base that are
34:52
monitoring that constellation, making sure that
34:55
The P &T that not only are
34:57
war fighters and coalition partners rely
34:59
on, but the agricultural
35:01
sector, the financial sector, the
35:03
transportation sector, that entire
35:05
ecosystem is built on the
35:07
sustainability and accuracy of
35:09
P &T and the GPS
35:11
constellation. Military SACCOM. space
35:13
-based missile warning and
35:16
Earth monitoring, space
35:18
domain awareness. As
35:20
you know, my teammate Colonel
35:22
Nick Hague just came back
35:24
from the space station last
35:26
month. One the things
35:28
we do as space domain awareness
35:30
is to make sure that the
35:32
47 ,000 or so objects that
35:34
are orbiting Earth as a space
35:36
force, we're tracking those using worldwide
35:39
sensors and we're sharing that data
35:41
with commercial uh partner nations
35:43
and nasa you know as a
35:45
fact so you know global space
35:47
operations is really the the core
35:49
which enables the the warfighter to
35:51
be more lethal but also supports
35:53
and enables the economy of the
35:55
of the united states the third this
35:57
is the other core function this is
35:59
the one as so why we were
36:01
established as a space force is what
36:03
we call space control for us
36:05
to provide space superiority this is
36:08
really where we talk about our ability
36:10
to ensure freedom of maneuver
36:12
and action on our own timing and
36:14
tempo within the space domain, but also
36:16
denying any kind of adversary the ability
36:18
to do the same. So
36:20
we say, okay, what is it we do as
36:22
a space force? It's assured space access, global
36:25
space operations, which we all do
36:27
those two very well, and really we're
36:29
removing and making investments is going
36:31
to be space control and our ability
36:33
to provide space superiority to the
36:35
nation and our allies. So from
36:37
the guardians that I love, and I get
36:40
up every day for, that's the work that
36:42
they're doing day in and day out. We
36:44
should clarify real quick. Guardians, that's the term for
36:46
the service members in the space force, as opposed
36:48
to like, yeah. Yes.
36:51
Which is way cooler than airmen. Just
36:54
in my opinion. Yeah,
36:56
I love it. I love it. So
36:58
I think it's worth mentioning that if
37:00
I understand correctly, I've written about this
37:02
a number of times, when
37:04
you look at the vast
37:06
impact the orbital assets have on
37:09
our lives. You mentioned GPS. There's
37:11
tracking ships at sea. There's
37:14
tracking cargo moving in trucks
37:16
and trains. There's agriculture,
37:18
you know, tracking crop health
37:20
and, and, and planting cycles and
37:22
so forth. Banking transactions
37:24
are often handled by satellite. All kinds
37:26
of communications, including video. I mean, the
37:28
list goes on and on and on.
37:30
And if that suddenly got switched off
37:32
one afternoon by some bad guy, Our
37:36
economy would come to a grinding halt
37:38
and much of the things that a
37:40
lot of us depend on day to
37:42
day would suddenly just stop. That is
37:44
all part of your domain, correct? Yes,
37:46
it is. 100%. And
37:48
that's why when we talk about
37:51
the amount of investment and focus
37:53
on global space operations, all the
37:55
things that you just talked about
37:57
is vitally important because from a
37:59
supporting function, making sure the economy
38:01
stays strong, making sure that the
38:03
nation remains safe, but also that
38:05
our joint war fighters rely on
38:07
a lot of that capability as
38:09
well. And that's why we still
38:12
do that today and consider those
38:14
inherently military functions. And
38:16
then which is why on the space superiority,
38:18
space control side, our ability to what
38:20
we call protect and defend, right?
38:22
So that no one has the
38:24
ability to take away those functions from
38:26
us and be able to protect
38:28
and defend them. That kind of leads
38:30
into the space priority space control
38:32
aspect of the mission set because you
38:34
know for many years It was
38:36
kind of a benign environment like we
38:38
were building you know these billion -dollar
38:40
satellites the size of buses right
38:42
and you know One of one of
38:44
my favorite teammates here in the
38:46
Space Force Lieutenant General Deanna Birch. She's
38:48
our our lead operator for the
38:50
service You know she'll go on these
38:52
big fat juicy targets that are
38:54
just sitting on the space because when
38:56
we designed and launched them We
38:58
were not necessarily thinking about a contested
39:00
domain, but it has become that.
39:02
So now we have to think a
39:04
little differently in how we, you
39:06
know, with proliferated constellations and resiliency
39:08
and all the things that go into
39:11
that kind of war fighting domain. And
39:13
I think just one more follow -up,
39:15
Tarek. When Space Force was announced, a
39:17
number of us were a little confused
39:19
about what was going to be different.
39:22
Of course, you know, it's an independent
39:24
service and all that, so that makes
39:26
sense. But having spent a little bit
39:28
of time around Space Command, I wasn't
39:30
clear on exactly what the difference was
39:32
between Space Force's role and what Space
39:34
Command for the Air Force had been
39:36
doing for years before that. Yeah.
39:38
You know, it's really actually interesting that
39:40
you asked me that question. I
39:43
was just in Colorado Springs, I think it
39:45
was last week for the Space Imposium. Do
39:47
you guys attend the Space Imposium? Not the
39:49
Broadmoor? My colleague Brett was
39:51
there last week. I was so, I had a
39:53
lot of FOMO because that's one of my favorite
39:55
conferences to be able to do too. Yeah, it's
39:57
a phenomenal conference. I mean, Space Foundation does a
39:59
phenomenal job. You know, Heather Pringle out there, the
40:01
CEO. So long relationship with,
40:03
you know, with the space community
40:06
and the Air Force and now at
40:08
the Space Force. But anyway, at
40:10
the closing dinner on Thursday evening
40:12
at the Broadmoor, they did a fireside
40:14
chat with myself. as the Chief
40:16
Master Sergeant in Space Force, and
40:18
Chief Master Sergeant Jacob Simmons, who
40:21
is the command senior. This is the
40:23
leader for US Space Command. And
40:25
part of the discussion to the audience
40:27
was the difference between what does
40:29
the service do and what does the
40:31
combatant command do? Because we put
40:33
space in a lot of things, right?
40:35
There's a lot of titles and
40:37
words. And it was our,
40:39
you know, because we get this question quite
40:41
often. So we figured, hey, the two most
40:43
senior enlisted individuals, Jake is also
40:45
a guardian, a longtime mentor of mine.
40:47
So we got up on stage, we did
40:49
a fireside chat, and we kind of
40:51
talked exactly through that. So when you talk
40:53
about the distinction between the both, you
40:56
know, a lot of times they
40:58
say, the services, organized training equipment. So
41:00
what does that mean? We recruit
41:02
guardians, we train and we develop
41:04
them, we prepare them, we give them the
41:06
warfighter ethos. We also make
41:08
investments and build and purchase
41:10
the capabilities that the combatant
41:12
command needs. Those are
41:15
organized, trained and equipped. But
41:17
also it's teaching the guardians, preparing
41:19
them that they can command and control,
41:21
they can integrate these capabilities into
41:23
the larger joint force. And then we
41:25
present those, if you will, to
41:27
the combatant command. And then under the
41:29
authorities of General Whiting, who's the
41:31
commander of US Space Command, will
41:33
execute and command and control the
41:35
forces we represent. So there is
41:37
a kind of distinct difference in
41:39
roles and responsibilities. They're
41:41
closely linked, especially because of how
41:43
we were established, so close
41:45
together, both in 2019. General
41:48
Raymond was still headed at one point
41:50
for both organizations. But
41:52
there is clear delineation. But
41:54
as a service, we are
41:56
trained and equipped, but we also are
41:58
responsible to train and develop to
42:00
make sure we can execute warfighting capabilities
42:03
as we present that to the
42:05
combat command under General Whiting's authority as
42:07
a combatant commander. And I'm not
42:09
moving to Colorado, and I'm not moving
42:11
to Alabama. I am stationed
42:13
in the Pentagon, and I get asked that
42:15
question quite a bit too. I've
42:17
never seen the Pentagon, but it looks like an amazing
42:19
place. I think this is the first time we
42:21
could say that we're coming live from the Pentagon. Right.
42:24
Right. Right. Oh, yeah. We've got to have
42:26
that in the promo. Okay. Tarq,
42:28
I know you. This is a museum. you guys
42:30
want to come check it out, let me know.
42:32
But there's a lot of phenomenal things to see
42:34
here in the building. Yes. Finally, we got a
42:36
benefit from doing this podcast. Okay. I
42:38
know Tarq's got a big question coming up. So let's
42:40
take a quick break. We'll be right back. Stand by. Imagine
42:44
a business owner relying on
42:46
a dozen different software programs. Each
42:49
one disconnected. more expensive and
42:51
more complicated than last. It
42:53
can be incredibly stressful, right? Now,
42:55
picture Odu. Odu brings all
42:57
the tools your business needs into
43:00
one simple platform. CRM,
43:02
accounting, inventory,
43:04
manufacturing, marketing, HR,
43:06
and more. All
43:08
seamlessly connected. Everything works
43:10
together, giving you the peace of mind
43:12
that your business is running smoothly from
43:14
every angle. Odu's open source
43:17
applications are user -friendly, and designed
43:19
to scale with your business, saving
43:21
you time and money. Say
43:23
goodbye to juggling multiple platforms and
43:25
hello to efficient integrated management.
43:27
Stop wasting resources on complicated systems
43:29
and make the switch to
43:31
Odu today. Visit Odu .com
43:33
O -D -O -O dot com
43:36
and discover how Odu can
43:38
simplify and streamline your business
43:40
operations. Odu. Modern management
43:42
made simple. You
43:47
know, Chief, I really appreciate kind
43:49
of the overview of what the
43:51
Space Force does and it seemed
43:53
like really a pro apropos. Very
43:56
good timing that
43:58
you're here with us
44:00
for this interview. Because
44:03
this week, as we were talking before
44:05
we started recording, General
44:07
Salzman, Chief of Space Operations released
44:09
the space war fighting framework for
44:11
the Space Force. And
44:13
I was burning to ask you about
44:15
how important having a framework like
44:17
that was. Because I guess one would
44:20
assume, as you just detailed
44:22
all of the different buckets that the
44:24
space force goes on to really keep
44:26
all of us in the technology that
44:28
I think maybe we take for granted
44:30
that is in space on our daily
44:32
lives. Keep
44:34
all of that working. But I'm
44:36
curious how a document like this new
44:38
framework either consolidates or crystallizes a
44:40
lot of things because as it says
44:42
kind of here in the description
44:44
that it's it establishes the common lexicon
44:46
for counter space operations which sounds
44:49
pretty exciting but it details both the
44:51
the the offensive and defensive actions
44:53
that guardians can can can do you
44:55
know basically what their their their
44:57
their actions can can be uh to
44:59
to oversee that that space uh
45:01
domain there but uh i guess what
45:03
what what type of i guess
45:05
what's what's the role of a document
45:07
like this in day -to -day operations
45:09
for guardians um you know, as things
45:12
change or occur in space. Yeah. So
45:14
thanks for the question. You know, we've had
45:16
phenomenal couple of years, you know, like we said
45:18
earlier, we're just, you know, we're,
45:20
you know, five and a half years old, you
45:23
know, almost. And
45:25
so there's so many foundational things
45:27
as a service, only five years
45:29
into this journey. You know,
45:31
we get compared a lot to the other services.
45:33
When you think about, you know, I think the
45:35
Army and Marine Corps would be 250 years old,
45:37
you know, this year. And
45:40
they have... battlefield, wartime,
45:42
lessons learned, examples,
45:44
proven doctrine, like
45:46
all those things that kind of build
45:48
that when you think about a
45:50
military professional, when you think about, you
45:52
know, doctrine and war fighting architectures,
45:54
right, there's a lot there. From
45:56
the space force perspective, you know, we
45:59
know one we're only five and a
46:01
half years old, if you will, and we've
46:03
never necessarily, we've never had war in
46:05
space. And we don't want that either. Right,
46:08
but what are the documents like the
46:10
like the war -fighting construct that we put
46:12
out to kind of talk about from an
46:14
integration planning perspective to communicate to the
46:16
broader joint and collision audience? What
46:18
are the capabilities? What's the common
46:20
lexicon or the terms of reference when
46:22
you're thinking about operational planning when
46:24
you think about what the Space Force
46:26
can do or also more importantly
46:29
when you think about the Space Force,
46:31
how do you ask? for capabilities. What
46:33
are the questions you ask? How
46:35
do you frame those so that
46:38
we can integrate into the joint
46:40
force is really important because we
46:42
just don't have a lot of
46:44
the history that it's presumptive that
46:46
everyone understands it, right? So capturing
46:48
our thoughts on terms of reference,
46:51
lexicon, what is space superiority mean?
46:53
What does defensive space operations mean?
46:55
What does defensive cyber operations mean
46:57
from the service perspective and kind
46:59
of baselining across the joint
47:01
force is really important. And I'll
47:04
be honest, that's not only an external
47:06
message, but it's also an internal
47:08
message as well. Young guardians
47:10
across the space force should be reading
47:12
these documents so they understand why
47:14
they go to work every day. Why
47:16
am I working at 3 a .m.
47:19
on a Saturday looking at data
47:21
coming down off of the sensor for
47:23
space domain awareness? Why is that
47:25
important? What's the war fighting construct? Where
47:27
do I see myself in the
47:29
larger ecosystem? So, you know, we've
47:31
done the War Front and Cards, like you
47:33
said, came out. We also
47:35
put out earlier this month,
47:38
Space Force Doctor and Document
47:40
One, which also, right, kind
47:42
of encapsulates a lot of
47:44
the papers and speeches and
47:46
thoughts that General Salsman specifically
47:48
has had the last couple
47:50
of years in a formalized
47:52
document that now individuals can
47:54
read and reference and kind
47:56
of talk about the who we are and what
47:58
we do. So, you know, it's
48:00
been a phenomenal couple of years,
48:02
but these official documents really help solidify,
48:04
communicate to a broader audience and
48:06
also some internally. What
48:08
are we doing and how are we going
48:10
to have to, especially if we're talking about
48:12
the space priority, space control perspective, because we
48:14
really haven't done that in a wartime environment. But
48:17
what are we planning for? How do we talk about
48:19
it? How do we integrate it? That's why those documents are
48:21
so important. Yeah, I guess
48:23
in an emergency you don't want
48:25
to have to be coming up with
48:27
that stuff on the fly So
48:29
it sounds like it's good to have
48:31
that like already written down. That's
48:33
right So we've seen recent fact we
48:35
reported I think last week on
48:37
a Russian satellite Yet another cosmos, which
48:39
means they're gonna tell us what
48:41
it is That from which a small
48:43
mass appeared to detach and maybe
48:45
start heading towards some of our orbital
48:48
assets. And of course, we've seen this before
48:50
with both the Russians and the Chinese. I
48:53
assume this is something you
48:55
track with great care other than
48:57
changing the trajectory or the
48:59
orbit of one of our satellites.
49:01
If something is threatened that's
49:03
vitally important, what
49:06
can you do and what steps might be
49:08
taken in the future to make these
49:10
kind of assets more defensible? Yeah.
49:12
So, you know, this is kind of
49:14
the broader discussion about what are norms of
49:16
behavior in space? What
49:18
are the international norms?
49:20
We have pretty good
49:22
documented and implemented norms
49:24
behavior at sea, maritime
49:26
sea law, FAA and
49:29
air traffic control. There
49:31
are things that pretty
49:33
much people understand what
49:35
is right and what
49:37
is wrong, and there's
49:39
enforcing ecosystems that allow
49:41
that to operate effectively. In
49:44
the space domain, to your
49:46
point, What what is responsible behavior
49:48
if you're gonna have a
49:50
RPO or one of your proximity
49:52
operations? What is a
49:54
safe distance? Is that considered
49:57
aggressive? Is it not these
49:59
are all kind of discussions that that
50:01
that we're kind of having so
50:03
so a lot of the systems to
50:05
your point when they were designed
50:07
for in a foreign environment where we
50:09
were not necessarily worrying about those
50:11
things But why it's so important now
50:14
with the future systems that that
50:16
that the situation has changed so you
50:18
know what counter you know counteraction
50:20
defensive capabilities do we have for them
50:22
we don't have maneuver without regret
50:24
now there's some you know we have
50:26
a couple of refueling demos that
50:29
we're going to do but as you
50:31
know right the physics of orbit
50:33
you're a little limited on what you
50:35
can do there there are some
50:37
maneuvers that you can do but for
50:39
the most part one of the
50:41
most important things is us
50:43
from a space domain awareness perspective,
50:45
that when these activities occur, one
50:48
that we're aware of it, there
50:50
is no what General Salsman talked
50:52
about operational surprise, that we
50:54
are winning what is happening in the domain. There's
50:57
attribution, we know who is
50:59
doing it, which is also
51:01
extremely important. So
51:03
what do we do about the first things? We
51:05
got to be able to know that it's happening
51:07
and we have to have attribution, right? So kind
51:09
of that no operational surprise as these things occur.
51:11
But this also goes into the
51:14
other discussion about protect and defend. What
51:18
are our capabilities to protect
51:20
and defend our resources and assets,
51:22
you know, in orbit? Other
51:24
than attribution, a
51:26
strongly worded demarc against another nation,
51:28
calling them outright for irresponsible behavior. But
51:31
this goes into, you know,
51:33
I think, you know, General Widing
51:36
at his speech at Space
51:38
Symposium, last Monday, I
51:40
think it was, as a combat commander
51:42
talked about, you know, fires from, you
51:44
know, fires and maneuvers in space and
51:46
weapons in space, basically, right? But
51:49
when you say weapons, right? Weapons are
51:51
not inherently offensive and defensive, right?
51:54
It's how you employ them, right?
51:56
But we have to have the ability to
51:58
protect and defend the resources of which
52:00
we rely on, but not only from an
52:02
economic perspective, but also
52:04
from a warfighting perspective. So
52:07
those are some of the discussions. And
52:09
you said, when you, some of these, you
52:11
know, activities that occur and we got
52:13
to understand that they're happening, we have to
52:15
have, that we know who's doing it,
52:17
attribution, and then right, working to make sure
52:19
that we have TTPs, status techniques
52:21
and procedures to do, you know,
52:23
whatever we can, but also have the
52:25
systems in order to protect and
52:27
defend. um, national
52:30
assets. So I'll just
52:32
bet you guys get some interesting
52:34
males and emails about different people
52:36
that have ideas about defensive systems.
52:38
And one for that file, which
52:40
I found years ago, I was
52:42
working on a book about space
52:44
age chapter about the lunar module
52:47
Grumman Grumman's lunar module from Apollo. And
52:49
there was one supposed study
52:52
by Grumman aircraft, which I
52:54
have never been able to,
52:56
uh, to actually vet fully,
52:58
so it's a little suspect.
53:00
But supposedly, when
53:02
the Grumman folks were trying to figure out
53:05
ways to extend the life of the
53:07
lunar module beyond 1972 in the Apollo program,
53:09
I mean, they were going to
53:11
use parts of it to do
53:14
the Apollo telescope mount on Skylab.
53:16
But my favorite one was an
53:18
orbital, a crewed orbital
53:20
spacecraft that would be able to
53:22
rendezvous with Russian satellites and
53:24
spray paint their cameras. Which
53:26
I thought was a pretty
53:29
cool. It's not even a weapon.
53:31
It's more like a nuisance.
53:33
I guess Yeah, yeah, I wonder
53:35
I wonder what the per
53:37
diem rate would be for that
53:39
job. That's that's got to
53:41
be crazy Yeah, you know when
53:43
you think about Here's
53:46
the other thing too, when we
53:48
talk about space priority, space
53:50
control, and what are the measures
53:52
we can take to kind
53:54
of deny an adversary their ability
53:56
to kind of maneuver free
53:58
within the domain. Some
54:01
of those actions are not limited to the domain, right? There's
54:04
kind of three segments when you think
54:06
about space operations, right? There's the on
54:08
orbit asset, and to your point about
54:10
that Russian vehicle
54:12
that was maneuvering maybe close to
54:14
one of our resources. There's
54:16
the link, right? There's got to be a command
54:18
and control, right? They know the EW spectrum, and
54:21
there's a ground station somewhere, right?
54:23
I mean, so when you think about the ground
54:25
station, the link, and the on -overed asset, when
54:27
we're trying to solve a hard problem, guardians
54:29
are thinking, maybe
54:31
to provide the effect that we need,
54:33
is it necessarily in the domain? There's
54:36
other things that we can do. And,
54:39
you know, that's why there's a
54:41
lot of research on analysis, our intelligence
54:43
operators, where I try to understand
54:45
the entire ecosystem and infrastructure of anything
54:47
that we need to be concerned
54:49
about, because we're not just going to
54:51
be limited to the on orbit
54:53
perspective. There's a lot of ways of skin
54:56
that cat, if you will. All
54:58
right, we will be back in just a
55:00
moment. Don't go anywhere. 25
55:04
years ago, a small group of
55:06
business and government leaders met in
55:08
Washington, DC. They envisioned
55:10
the creation of an independent, non
55:12
-profit organization with a mission to
55:14
help people businesses and government
55:16
mitigate the growing threat of cyber
55:19
attacks. Today, the Center for
55:21
Internet Security embodies that vision. For
55:23
25 years, it's worked with
55:25
a global community of IT
55:27
and cybersecurity experts to develop
55:29
the CIS benchmarks and CIS
55:31
critical security controls. These
55:33
proven security best practices
55:35
defend against common cyber threats
55:37
and streamline compliance with
55:39
industry frameworks, regulations and standards.
55:42
Today, CIS provides cybersecurity services,
55:44
threat intelligence, and critical
55:46
resources to help public and
55:49
private sector organizations alike
55:51
strengthen their cyber defenses. Visit
55:53
cisecurity .org today. That's the
55:55
letters C I security .org to
55:57
find out how CIS can
56:00
help your organization as we
56:02
create confidence in the connected
56:04
world. Yeah,
56:06
you know, I was really curious, you
56:08
know, in the early days of the space
56:10
age, right? There was a bit of
56:12
a. I don't want to say if it
56:14
was like a scramble, but it seems
56:16
like each branch of the U .S. military
56:18
services like had their own plan for how
56:20
to use space, you
56:22
know, where, you know, either the army had
56:24
plans, you know, for reconnaissance or the
56:27
Air Force is like, yes, obviously we're going
56:29
to have pilots, so we should get
56:31
domain over space. But having an actual space
56:33
force, you know, that has kind of
56:35
a really clear picture like you outlined earlier,
56:38
you know, defined I guess in what
56:40
is this, the 21st century. Now, you
56:42
know, it seems to make a lot of
56:44
sense, but I'm curious if kind of similar
56:47
to those early days where maybe there might
56:49
have been a lot of infighting over who
56:51
gets what domain, have there been any challenges
56:53
to the space forces, you know, organization or
56:55
outreach to get its message understood. And
56:57
I'm curious, you know, what, you know,
56:59
like what your answer to that, you know,
57:01
was to kind of make sure that
57:04
things continue going smoothly. Yeah, you know, as
57:06
an example, when the service set up
57:08
the first couple of years, there was an
57:10
assessment of what investments the other services
57:12
were making that kind of fell within the
57:14
roles and responsibilities of the Space Force. And
57:17
a lot of capabilities were transferred
57:19
from other services into the Space
57:21
Force, as an example. The
57:24
army had what to call the JTAG
57:26
system, which was a kind of a
57:28
tactical theater level missile warning capability that
57:30
they owned the equipment and the soldiers
57:32
were trained to execute that. When the
57:34
service space first stood up, the army
57:36
transferred that mission and equipment over to
57:39
us. You know, on the
57:41
Navy side, you know, the Navy
57:43
uses the Muos narrowband consolation for sea
57:45
communications. That mission set
57:47
came over to the the
57:49
space force and the army
57:51
again they used they used
57:53
the um the the i'm
57:55
trying to think the wide
57:57
wideband global constellation system the
58:00
um who uh they use a
58:02
lot of wideband and they had
58:05
ground stations uh wisox wideband silent
58:07
operations centers where they had soldiers
58:09
stationed, and they would divvy up the
58:11
bandwidth to make sure that soldiers in
58:13
the theater had silent communications. That
58:15
mission came over to the Space
58:17
Force. So there was an initial
58:19
assessment of services all had a
58:21
little bit of space, and
58:24
then what made sense to come into
58:26
the service. But even
58:28
today, there's still investment for
58:30
some tactical capability. For
58:32
example, on the Army side, a
58:36
multi -domain task
58:38
force, MDTS, that
58:40
they're investing in. They have some
58:42
space capabilities that will be organic
58:44
and inherent to the army because
58:46
they also understand the value of
58:48
what space brings, but
58:50
it's integrated into their tactical
58:52
schema maneuver. So
58:54
it's not necessarily, hey, you're going to leverage it, but
58:56
it's not a space force, a mission. But
58:59
it's a space capability that's going to
59:01
be organic to the army and they're going
59:03
to maintain that You know, we use
59:05
it again, you know, we think about pilots
59:07
the Air Force isn't the only branch
59:09
with pilots and aircraft So right there are
59:11
some things that are kind of naturally
59:13
belong to the space force as we kind
59:15
of went through this but also an
59:17
acknowledgement And we talk about how
59:20
important the domain is, you know, space
59:22
capabilities underpins lethality of all the services. There
59:24
are some investments and some things that services
59:26
will continue to do. But
59:28
I think when you think
59:30
about space superiority specifically and
59:32
space control in the domain, freedom
59:35
of maneuver in the domain, that
59:37
is squarely within the realm and
59:39
responsibility of the space force. Yeah,
59:42
I'm curious what, how
59:45
far that domain You know, you see
59:47
it expanding because as we know, you
59:49
know, NASA with the Artemis program wants
59:51
to send astronauts back to the moon
59:53
that hopefully that happens in the next
59:55
couple of years. But unlike in, you
59:57
know, maybe the first space race where
59:59
there was, you know, one other competitor,
1:00:01
the Soviet Union at the time, to
1:00:03
get there, you've got many other nations
1:00:05
that are all trying to get to
1:00:07
the moon to use it for different
1:00:09
ways. And I'm curious what role you
1:00:11
see the space force playing in either
1:00:13
lunar exploration, lunar security, uh search and
1:00:15
rescue you know that kind of a
1:00:18
thing uh because it seems like if
1:00:20
your domain is space it just keeps
1:00:22
going forever once you get off the
1:00:24
earth even though we use most of
1:00:26
the assets here on the ground yeah
1:00:28
um you know uh for many years
1:00:30
lexicon when we talked about space there
1:00:32
was like this glass ceiling if you
1:00:34
would at geostationary right the 22 000
1:00:36
miles up uh out um where a
1:00:38
lot of our you know communications satellites
1:00:40
are And that was kind
1:00:42
of seen for many years, you know
1:00:44
in the circles operational that I that I
1:00:46
worked in it's kind of like the
1:00:48
edge of space The boy has that changed
1:00:51
to your point sis lunar, but I
1:00:53
think about just activity on the moon alone.
1:00:55
I just I think over the last
1:00:57
at least You know six or seven months,
1:00:59
right? You know non
1:01:01
non -nation sponsors like commercial or
1:01:03
landing on the moon now,
1:01:05
right when you think about
1:01:09
Jared Eisenman, right? He
1:01:11
did this personal commercial
1:01:13
spacewalk. Think about where we
1:01:15
are. So the domain to
1:01:17
your point is really expanding and
1:01:19
to kind of think. of 22 ,000
1:01:21
miles as kind of like the edge
1:01:23
of space is no longer the
1:01:26
case. So from a space force
1:01:28
perspective, you know, we
1:01:30
are looking as more and more individuals
1:01:32
are, you know, going out to Cislunar pass
1:01:34
the grain points. You know,
1:01:36
what is our ability to maintain space domain
1:01:38
awareness? What is our, what are
1:01:40
the technologies and the research and development
1:01:42
we have to do there, you know, to
1:01:44
help align, right? You know, especially as
1:01:46
NASA and other civil agencies, You
1:01:48
know project and you know reach
1:01:50
further out into the stars There's
1:01:52
gonna be a role for the
1:01:54
space space force to play there
1:01:56
But but yeah, I mean it
1:01:58
where does it end? It doesn't
1:02:00
right and that's the exciting part
1:02:02
of this job Is that you
1:02:05
know trying to have guardians think
1:02:07
about our role right in those
1:02:09
dreamers and explorers? That they're
1:02:11
gonna rely on us to make sure
1:02:13
they can freely move an over
1:02:15
and take advantage of that So wherever
1:02:17
you know, national interests expand out
1:02:19
to, that will be where the space
1:02:21
force expands out to as well. You
1:02:24
know, Tariq, I'm beginning to get the
1:02:26
feeling his job is a whole lot more
1:02:28
interesting and enjoyable than ours. And the
1:02:30
benefits are probably much better. Yeah, we need
1:02:32
to have a conversation. We have, of
1:02:34
course, no qualifications to do anything like that.
1:02:37
But that doesn't mean we want to try. That's
1:02:39
like when we want to be astronauts. We were young. So
1:02:42
here's a question that's been bugging me
1:02:44
for Gosh, decades. I'm sure it
1:02:46
bugs you guys too. Are
1:02:48
there any preventative or defensive measures
1:02:50
that one can take against something
1:02:52
like an EMP, which has always
1:02:54
been sorry, that's an electromagnetic pulse
1:02:56
weapons. So you send a small
1:02:58
nuke up to space that goes
1:03:00
boom over a country and everybody's
1:03:02
electrical grid and all their electronics
1:03:04
go down. At least that's what
1:03:06
they say in fiction. I think
1:03:08
it's a little dressed up. But
1:03:10
how serious is that and how
1:03:12
do you address something like that? So,
1:03:16
you know, for many years, you
1:03:18
know, I have worked in facilities
1:03:20
that were EMP hardened, if you
1:03:22
will. Like, I've walked through the
1:03:24
brass plated doors with the contacts
1:03:26
that are rounded and, you know,
1:03:28
the signs that don't step on
1:03:30
the contacts, right? Because they got
1:03:32
to stay clean and fresh and
1:03:34
make sure we have to close
1:03:36
that door, right? To protect the
1:03:38
internals from EMP on the ground
1:03:40
is really important. You know, several
1:03:42
of our on -orbit assets, right,
1:03:45
that are strategic in nature, are
1:03:47
designed to be EMP -hardened, if you
1:03:49
will. The challenge with that,
1:03:51
whether you're on the ground or on orbit,
1:03:53
it's expensive. And it's really
1:03:55
hard to do. So
1:03:57
are there ways, strategies to
1:04:00
kind of protect yourselves from
1:04:02
EMP? Yes. And
1:04:05
we have some things, we've
1:04:07
made some progress, we have
1:04:09
made grounds, some strides there,
1:04:11
but when you think about
1:04:13
the cost of launch, every
1:04:16
ounce, every pound matters, and
1:04:18
we talk about where we
1:04:20
are with proliferated constellations and
1:04:22
the... number of payloads per
1:04:24
launch has just exploded with
1:04:26
Esper rings. Think about Starlink
1:04:28
and the dozens of microsatellites
1:04:30
that they put on orbit
1:04:33
all the time. It's
1:04:35
kind of hard to have EMP
1:04:37
hardening in that kind of construct.
1:04:40
because it's supposed to be replenished. But
1:04:42
when you think about some of the challenges, and
1:04:45
I don't know if you're trying to allude to some of
1:04:47
the reports on Russia, and maybe
1:04:49
putting on some capabilities on
1:04:51
orbit or thinking about
1:04:53
having nuclear capability as an
1:04:55
offensive or just a
1:04:57
weapon in general, it
1:04:59
would have a devastating impact, right, to
1:05:01
your point. Unlike,
1:05:04
you know, it's physics.
1:05:06
right so there you know whether
1:05:08
it be commercial civil or military
1:05:11
you know whether it be leo
1:05:13
meal or geo orbit there's gonna
1:05:15
be a lot of collateral damage
1:05:17
and it would you know be
1:05:19
able to recover from that. From
1:05:21
a global perspective, we just
1:05:23
be unthinkable, right? And we talked earlier,
1:05:25
right? Space provides such
1:05:27
an infrastructure to make us
1:05:29
as effective and efficient as
1:05:32
we are in agriculture, in
1:05:34
finance, in transportation, safety,
1:05:37
power grids, in cities.
1:05:41
All that would be at risk
1:05:43
if there's irresponsible behavior in
1:05:45
the context of any kind of
1:05:47
EMP or nuclear device. in
1:05:49
the orbit. So hopefully
1:05:52
that's something we never have to come
1:05:54
to. There is some protection that we
1:05:56
are able to do, but for large and most
1:05:58
part, when you think about what we rely upon,
1:06:00
what is it in orbit, large
1:06:03
preponderance would not be secured
1:06:05
and protected from an EMP. Something
1:06:08
to aspire to. Change
1:06:11
of subject here. One
1:06:13
of the things, I remember what
1:06:15
Space Force was first being announced, One
1:06:18
of the things Tark and I spent time
1:06:20
doing was disabusing people the notion that this
1:06:22
was going to look like Battlestar Galactica with
1:06:24
guys and vipers flying around and shooting at
1:06:26
each other in orbit. But I
1:06:28
assume this is a two -part
1:06:30
question. First is, I assume that
1:06:32
part of your long range planning
1:06:34
is for crewed spaceflight. And
1:06:36
if so, would there be a role somewhat
1:06:38
like a space coast guard at some point
1:06:40
where you're guarding the lanes and CIS lunar
1:06:42
space and so forth? Yeah,
1:06:45
we haven't had really too
1:06:47
many discussions on that, but
1:06:50
I think part of it
1:06:52
is watching where civil and
1:06:54
commercial go. When
1:06:56
you think about
1:06:58
commercial flights
1:07:00
today, when
1:07:02
there's NASA's launching, the
1:07:04
military from a recovery,
1:07:06
if you will, especially
1:07:09
back in the back.
1:07:11
terrestrial once they come back in the
1:07:13
atmosphere you know we the actually United
1:07:15
States Air Force is postured to do
1:07:17
any kind of rescue of astronauts right
1:07:19
once they kind of come back into
1:07:21
the atmosphere you know our ability to
1:07:23
be able to do something you know
1:07:25
in orbit today organically from the service
1:07:27
just kind of isn't there yet we
1:07:29
necessarily haven't been charged with that mission
1:07:31
and everything is what the what the
1:07:33
president says that this is a mission
1:07:35
right of the service so we haven't
1:07:37
been given that yet But there has
1:07:39
been some, you know, back of the
1:07:41
napkin, you know, at the end of
1:07:43
our Friday talking about, man, you know, what's
1:07:46
going to happen when we have
1:07:48
increased tourism and space as we
1:07:51
travel, you know, out, you know,
1:07:53
beyond low earth orbit? You
1:07:55
know, what is our roles and responsibilities
1:07:57
to do that? So it's exciting to
1:07:59
think about all that. But I think
1:08:01
to your point, I think that mission
1:08:03
set would probably start with the United
1:08:06
States Space Force as a responsibility. And
1:08:08
then probably, as that prevalence continues to
1:08:10
grow, I mean, who knows 50, 60
1:08:12
years from now where we're going to
1:08:15
be, to your point, is there a
1:08:17
space guard, a Coast Guard equivalent? I
1:08:20
don't know, but I assume that
1:08:22
the discussion would start with the
1:08:24
United States Space Force. And
1:08:26
again, we think about some of that. We
1:08:28
watch and see where commercial and civil are
1:08:30
going. We're
1:08:32
just gonna, you know, wherever national interests extend
1:08:34
out to, we will answer the call. But
1:08:37
it's exciting to think about it. It
1:08:39
really is. It is. This guard sounds really
1:08:41
sci -fi. That's really cool. You
1:08:43
know, I'm surprised it's taken us
1:08:45
this long. Chief, to get all
1:08:47
the way to astronauts and flying
1:08:49
in space and guardians and whatnot,
1:08:51
because you just said earlier how
1:08:53
Nick Hague just returned from the
1:08:55
space station the first, I guess
1:08:57
the first space force guardian to
1:08:59
launch inland. And I
1:09:01
guess Mike Hopkins swore, transitioned
1:09:04
over to the space force
1:09:06
for the first anniversary in
1:09:08
2020. But
1:09:10
I'm curious, what is
1:09:12
that path for for astronaut
1:09:14
guardians to go. And it
1:09:16
sounds like there's other work
1:09:19
that guardians are doing with
1:09:21
NASA already. Yeah, so
1:09:23
obviously, you know, Colonel Hague right now,
1:09:25
like I said, he was the first
1:09:27
guardian to actually launch. you
1:09:29
know, and went up for a
1:09:32
second visit to the International Space Station, really
1:09:34
proud of, you know, Carl Haig representing. But
1:09:37
it's really important to note, right, for
1:09:39
the audience and everyone else that, you
1:09:41
know, NASA is a civil organization and
1:09:43
the Space Force is a military organization.
1:09:45
But, right, because of the talent,
1:09:47
you know, when they're looking
1:09:49
for astronauts, all the services have
1:09:51
the ability to nominate candidates to become
1:09:53
astronauts with NASA and work for
1:09:55
NASA. So Colonel Hague was
1:09:57
on the International Space Station, you know,
1:09:59
that relationship. You know, he
1:10:02
was doing experiments, research
1:10:04
and development on behalf of NASA.
1:10:07
He was doing outreach and things
1:10:09
on behalf of NASA, if
1:10:11
you will. So it's a great partnership,
1:10:13
great relationship, having a guardian up there.
1:10:15
I got to tell you, there were
1:10:17
a couple of interactions that
1:10:19
the Space Force had with Colonel Hague while he
1:10:21
was on the space station. And I
1:10:23
thought when I worked in Colorado and when I
1:10:25
look out my window I would have Pike's Peak
1:10:28
in the background, hit office
1:10:30
on the International Space Station if you
1:10:32
know. I'm telling
1:10:34
you, like, Rod, if you think that
1:10:36
your windows out behind you have a
1:10:38
view, talking to
1:10:40
Colonel Hague when he's on the
1:10:42
space station was just phenomenal. So
1:10:44
it's inspiring for the kind of
1:10:46
have that relationship and allowing him
1:10:48
to continue exploration and the research
1:10:50
and development and things from the
1:10:53
civic perspective. That's amazing.
1:10:55
But that's just one guardian
1:10:57
that's working with NASA. I
1:10:59
spoke earlier today to
1:11:02
one of our sergeants, you know,
1:11:04
an enlisted member, William Wallace
1:11:06
is his name, and he
1:11:08
has his degree in biology, and
1:11:11
he partnered with an organization, and he
1:11:13
just spent some time out in Arizona
1:11:15
at Biosphere 2, and he was doing
1:11:17
research on kind of algae growth, right,
1:11:20
and ability, you know,
1:11:22
Can it grow in Mars
1:11:24
or lunar formations in
1:11:26
the dirt that's there? In
1:11:29
microgravity conditions, like what does that look
1:11:31
like? And he spent a couple of
1:11:33
weeks working with NASA and other researchers,
1:11:35
leveraging his biology degree, but also
1:11:37
his leadership and understanding of command
1:11:39
and control and space operations, because
1:11:41
he worked in mission command for
1:11:43
a little bit there. So
1:11:45
I had a chance to talk to him
1:11:48
earlier today. And another great example, right
1:11:50
of guardians in the space force, kind of
1:11:52
partnered with NASA, you know,
1:11:54
non -military related endeavors, but
1:11:57
just that passion for space and
1:11:59
the ability to kind of work
1:12:01
as a team is always really
1:12:03
inspiring and amazing opportunities for them
1:12:05
to do that. Yeah, I was
1:12:07
looking at that study that Sergeant
1:12:09
Wallace was part of and it
1:12:11
looked like because I mean,
1:12:13
just to put it in perspective,
1:12:15
it's like a blue -green algae
1:12:17
diet supplement for astronauts. And it
1:12:19
sounds like stuff that you could apply
1:12:21
on Earth for supplements across the
1:12:23
board. I mean, that seems like
1:12:25
stuff that goes far beyond even
1:12:27
spacework there too. That's right. Now,
1:12:30
William did tell me this morning, it doesn't taste
1:12:32
very good. But
1:12:34
as a military member,
1:12:37
how to remind him a little bit of hot sauce goes
1:12:39
a long way. Sounds
1:12:42
like somebody who's eating some MREs
1:12:44
in your past. Your Sriracha, Spiralina,
1:12:46
if I pronounce that right. I've
1:12:48
had my share. Have you had
1:12:51
a chance to get out to
1:12:53
Biosphere, by the way? I
1:12:55
have not. I have not. The
1:12:58
team does a really good job
1:13:00
trying to get a strategy for where
1:13:02
I get a chance to travel
1:13:04
and engage and do outreach and kind
1:13:06
of figure out where's the next
1:13:08
evolution, what are opportunities and relationships we
1:13:10
can build. I have not had
1:13:13
a chance to get out there yet.
1:13:15
Well, if you do, it's well worth it.
1:13:17
It's a little bit like Tomorrowland for
1:13:19
space, but it's quite an impressive
1:13:21
thing and it's amazing that they did it
1:13:24
and had the success they did. Do
1:13:27
you have anything you recommend in terms
1:13:29
of where people can go to get
1:13:31
a real sense of the Space Force
1:13:34
story and what's happening now and in
1:13:36
the future? Or how to say, you
1:13:38
know, I think, you know, when you
1:13:40
go out to, you know, we have
1:13:42
the spaceforce .com, spaceforce .mil. We have our
1:13:44
websites and, you know, we've been working
1:13:46
really hard. You know, there's
1:13:48
a, there's a pamphlet, if you will.
1:13:50
It's called Space Force 101 that has
1:13:52
some information in it. And there's a
1:13:54
link out on, on, on our sites.
1:13:56
We try to be, we're trying to
1:13:58
be really good at consolidating where there'd
1:14:00
be, you know, videos, interviews, news stories,
1:14:02
you know, in a central location that
1:14:04
allows, you know, only guardians that are
1:14:06
serving in their families. But also
1:14:08
for people who are interested, like
1:14:10
what is going on? What is
1:14:12
General Salsman talking about now? What
1:14:15
are some initiatives in the
1:14:17
way forward? What are the successes
1:14:19
that the service was doing
1:14:21
and highlight stuff like Sergeant Wallace
1:14:24
and Colonel Haig? But
1:14:26
usually we try to push people as
1:14:28
a digital service, try to push them
1:14:30
out to our social media and our
1:14:32
websites, try to get linked up and
1:14:34
kind of where we're going and what we're doing. I
1:14:37
have to say that your picture
1:14:39
and presentation of the Space Force, Chief,
1:14:41
is much more, what's the word,
1:14:44
accomplished than, I guess, how Netflix put
1:14:46
it in that TV show that
1:14:48
they put out. So it's nice to
1:14:50
know that it actually works and
1:14:52
that it's not just a comedy on
1:14:54
TV, so for sure. Yeah, I
1:14:56
appreciate that. And I will not be
1:14:59
seeing a Kokomo today. Did
1:15:02
you happen to watch the show when
1:15:04
it was on? I
1:15:06
did. I watched the first season.
1:15:08
I didn't watch the second season,
1:15:10
but I will tell you that
1:15:12
certain of the, and I won't
1:15:14
reveal it, but there are certain
1:15:16
nuances and certain parts of the
1:15:19
show that have me laughing so
1:15:21
hard, thinking to myself, are
1:15:23
they reading my emails?
1:15:25
Like what is going on?
1:15:29
But yeah, some of it was just very
1:15:31
much tongue -in -cheek. I'll be honest, right? You
1:15:33
know, Eve and I invited you to come
1:15:35
visit the Pentagon. But when you
1:15:37
walk down, you know, each service in the
1:15:39
Pentagon has a hallway. And
1:15:42
we have the Space Force hallway. And
1:15:44
there's, there's nods to the pop
1:15:46
culture of the Space Force, right? There's,
1:15:48
there's a reference to Star Trek,
1:15:50
right? And our Delta, you know, though,
1:15:53
you know, NASA used the Delta way before, you
1:15:55
know, years ago, you know, there
1:15:57
is something from this, from the
1:15:59
Netflix show, you know, there's bed and
1:16:01
jerry's ice cream. I mean, there's
1:16:03
some references about, you know, when you
1:16:05
think about space has been ingrained
1:16:07
in our, you know, science fiction pop
1:16:10
culture for so many years, and
1:16:12
now to have a space force, a
1:16:14
little nod to it. But
1:16:16
we have come so far in, you
1:16:18
know, the last five a half years, we
1:16:20
are looking at like, okay, Um,
1:16:22
maybe that was appropriate, you know, four
1:16:24
and a half years ago, right? But now
1:16:26
we've got real guardians doing real work
1:16:29
for the nation and we're looking to see,
1:16:31
you know, how do we start to
1:16:33
tell that story as well? Well, but
1:16:35
I get it all the time on, on the
1:16:37
culture. You know, you
1:16:39
got to embrace it, right? I mean, it's
1:16:41
kind of cool, but, you know, but it allows
1:16:43
me right to kind of pivot to the,
1:16:45
you know, ha ha, but let's
1:16:48
talk about what we're really doing. Right.
1:16:50
This is serious work. Well,
1:16:52
sir, I want to thank you for
1:16:54
joining us today for episode 157 that
1:16:56
and I apologize in advance that we're
1:16:58
going to call Space Force because you
1:17:00
just have to say it that way.
1:17:03
I grew up in the sixties, you
1:17:05
know, everything sounded like that. Where
1:17:07
can we, you kind of gave us an idea
1:17:10
already, but is there, is there any other spot online
1:17:12
that we might want to go just to see
1:17:14
what you're up to or your department? Yeah,
1:17:16
so I have myself as
1:17:18
the office of the Chief Ambassador
1:17:20
of the Space Force, you
1:17:22
know, has a Facebook site, an
1:17:25
Instagram site, also, you know,
1:17:27
the Space Force in and of
1:17:29
itself. Like I said, as
1:17:31
a digital service, we're really trying to leverage
1:17:33
what is the way that we can
1:17:35
communicate to masses, you know, in a
1:17:37
platform that allows them to do that. So,
1:17:39
you know, if you go to the websites, go
1:17:41
to the social media sites, that's probably a
1:17:43
really good landing point. And now we'll have your
1:17:45
links to wherever you guys want to go,
1:17:47
but we really try to highlight and say this
1:17:49
is kind of where we are, what we're
1:17:52
doing, easy to access from your phone or wherever
1:17:54
you are to kind of tell the Space
1:17:56
Force story and really brag about Guardians and brag
1:17:58
about the things that we're doing. That's really
1:18:00
important. And I'm honored to have
1:18:02
the chance be able to do that. Excellent.
1:18:05
Tarek, where can we find you playing
1:18:07
Intergalactic Warrior these days? Well, you can find
1:18:09
me at space .com as always, Rod, also
1:18:11
on the X right at Tarek J.
1:18:13
Malik and Blue Sky too. You can find
1:18:15
me on YouTube at Space Ron Plays
1:18:17
and this weekend you will find me on
1:18:19
Broadway because I'm going to go see
1:18:21
a show. It's going to be exciting. And
1:18:24
help my daughter build her Pinewood Derby car
1:18:26
for Girl Scout. What is this with all
1:18:28
this leisure time when you should be over
1:18:30
at space .com? Bring us more news. And
1:18:33
of course... always find me at
1:18:35
pilebooks .com or at astramagazine .com or on
1:18:37
some social media, although not as
1:18:39
much as TARC. And maybe
1:18:41
sooner, the Space Force Recruiting Depot near you.
1:18:43
Who knows? Remember,
1:18:45
you can always drop us a line
1:18:47
at twist at twit .tv. That's TWIS
1:18:49
at twit .tv. We welcome your comments,
1:18:52
suggestions, and ideas. New episodes, this
1:18:54
podcast publish every Friday on your favorite
1:18:56
podcatcher. So make sure to
1:18:58
subscribe, tell your friends, and give us reviews.
1:19:00
We're counting on you. Don't forget, we're also
1:19:02
counting on you to join Club Twit this
1:19:04
year. This year is still young.
1:19:06
You've got time. Besides supporting this show and
1:19:08
others on the network, you'll
1:19:10
keep us all very happy and feeling loved
1:19:12
and warm electrons headed your way. Finally,
1:19:15
you can follow the Twit Tech Podcast Network
1:19:17
at Twit on Twitter and on Facebook and
1:19:19
Twit .TV on Instagram. Gentlemen,
1:19:21
thank you for joining today. This has
1:19:23
been a real pleasure, and I hope
1:19:26
we see you again. Thanks
1:19:28
a lot. Sapper Supra. Stay
1:19:30
on top of tech trends without
1:19:32
the time sink. Twitter
1:19:34
TV's short form podcasts are built
1:19:36
for busy leaders like you delivering
1:19:38
essential insights in minutes. Hands on
1:19:41
Mac and hands on Windows provide
1:19:43
quick tips for Mac and PC
1:19:45
while hands on tech quickly addresses
1:19:47
common tech challenges to keep your
1:19:49
operations running smoothly. If your
1:19:51
conference room needs an upgrade, Home Theater
1:19:53
Geeks explores the best screen and sound
1:19:55
systems. And if you like watching
1:19:57
the shows, join ClubTwit to get
1:20:00
full video access and free versions and
1:20:02
more. Get technology that
1:20:04
matters on your schedule. Download
1:20:06
our short format shows now
1:20:08
at twit .tv or your
1:20:10
favorite podcast player.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More