Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
week in virology
0:02
the podcast about
0:04
viruses the kind
0:07
that make you
0:09
sick from microbe tv
0:11
this is twiv this week
0:14
in virology episode
0:16
11 96 recorded
0:18
on february 27
0:21
2025 i'm
0:23
vincent racon yellow and you're listening to
0:25
the podcast all about viruses Joining
0:29
me today from New York,
0:31
Daniel Griffin. Hello,
0:34
everyone. Oh, the Parasites
0:36
Without Borders bowtie. Right
0:39
with the world and the Ascarus
0:41
worm all wrapped around it. How
0:44
many bowties do you have? Like 50? It's
0:47
got to be over 100 at this point. So
0:49
we're never going to see the same one in
0:51
a year. You know, there
0:53
are certain ones I realize that
0:55
I... So I
0:57
probably have about 50 that are microbes,
0:59
but I also have a whole bunch
1:01
of like sailing ties and, you know,
1:04
I have a bunch of like Mickey
1:06
Mouse pediatric ties. Do you have a
1:08
favorite microbe tie? Yeah,
1:10
what is what is my go -to? You
1:13
know people probably know like when I
1:15
travel like if I'm just gonna throw
1:18
one in there It'll probably be my
1:20
my gonorrhea the clap bow tie because
1:22
it's it's a bright sort of Okay,
1:25
yeah, so let's say you're gonna watch
1:27
and you're gonna have a meeting with
1:29
RFK jr. What
1:31
bow tie you're gonna wear? So, you
1:33
know, as I have done, like in
1:36
certain situations like that, I've
1:38
got this really nice coronavirus
1:40
bow tie, and it's sort
1:42
of a black with a
1:44
gold coronavirus. Yeah. Oh,
1:47
I can hear the conversation. Dr.
1:49
Griffin, what's that on your tie? And you
1:51
say it's a coronavirus, and he said, oh,
1:53
that doesn't exist. Good.
1:56
All right, so let's get
1:59
into it. I'm going to start
2:01
off with a quotation, which, you know,
2:03
I was looking this up because I've
2:05
been hearing this, well, since I was
2:07
a small lad from my grandmother. So
2:10
I figured like where, you know, who
2:12
was the first who said this? So
2:14
apparently this is attributed to Samuel Langhorn
2:16
Clemens. Never let the truth
2:18
get in the way of a good story.
2:22
So Mark Twain and and
2:24
unfortunately this is a quotation
2:26
for our times or a
2:28
lot of folks seem to
2:30
feel this way and Not
2:32
to be political Vincent but
2:34
meeting of key CDC vaccine
2:36
advisory panel under scrutiny by
2:38
RFK junior is postponed Officials
2:41
say the session will be
2:43
rescheduled but provides no details.
2:46
And so the advisory committee on immunization
2:49
practices was to meet from February 26
2:51
to 28, like right now as we're
2:53
talking. It's first gathering
2:56
since the Trump administration took
2:58
office. That will not
3:00
happen according to Andrew Nixon,
3:02
the HHS Director of Communications.
3:06
There was a notice of
3:09
postponement posted on the American
3:11
Committee on Immunization Practices homepage.
3:15
The ASIP work groups met as
3:17
scheduled this month, but we still
3:19
do not know about the ASIP
3:21
meeting. I do have a link
3:23
here to the draft agenda where they were to
3:25
talk about meningitis vaccines,
3:27
drunken gunia vaccines, flu
3:30
vaccines, RSV vaccines, HPV
3:33
vaccines, Mpox vaccine, Lyme
3:36
disease, COVID -19
3:38
vaccines, and CMV vaccines. And
3:41
this is where they were going to
3:44
select, like, hey, which flu shot are
3:46
we going to recommend next year? That's
3:48
the verb back, right, at the
3:51
FDA? Yeah, so the FDA. So
3:53
two meetings, two important meetings,
3:56
canceled Daniel. What messages
3:58
are Americans to get from
4:00
this? Probably most of them
4:02
would like to get some of these
4:05
vaccines. And so what does
4:07
this mean? That we get no guidance from
4:09
the administration. Well, it's tough. I
4:11
mean, we were told that they're looking
4:13
for a larger room. People
4:16
who are not allowed to talk to
4:18
people told me this, that the excuse
4:20
they're giving is we want a larger
4:22
room because what we would like is
4:24
we would like to have a lot
4:26
of public there so that when they're
4:28
trying to have a discussion that the
4:31
public can quote unquote weigh in with
4:33
loud voices. The challenge
4:35
here and this is something I want
4:37
people to think about. So, you know,
4:39
we're going to talk about Texas and
4:42
measles and you see 97 % of
4:44
the children there are vaccinated. So, you
4:46
know, vaccinating children is still a mainstream
4:49
recognized thing that we do here in
4:51
the US. But. There's
4:54
ways to undermine vaccines which are a
4:56
little, let's say, sneaky, and I think
4:58
that's the right word, right? So the
5:01
way that vaccines get covered is you
5:03
have these meetings and then the advisory
5:05
committee goes through the data and they
5:08
say, you know, this is the flu
5:10
vaccine and we're going to recommend this
5:12
and, you know, similar to some of
5:14
these other vaccines. And then the CDC
5:17
makes a recommendation, and
5:19
then we have recommended vaccines,
5:21
and then after that Medicare pays for
5:24
it, insurance pays for it. If you
5:26
don't let these groups meet, then there
5:28
are no recommended vaccines. you
5:30
know, quote unquote, we're going to let parents
5:33
and their doctors make a decision. But what
5:35
this is going to lead to is that
5:37
we're not going to necessarily have those vaccinations
5:39
covered. So when, you know, mom says, yeah,
5:41
I really feel like I do want to
5:43
protect my child from, you know, encephalitis and
5:45
death and all these other horrible things. The
5:49
next thing may be, yeah, but your insurance
5:51
isn't going to cover it because we've, you
5:53
know, sort of undermine the process here. Great.
5:56
What a great plan. Well,
5:58
it's sneaky is what it is.
6:01
They use rhetoric and the rest,
6:03
but we'll get... This is crazy.
6:06
The federal government, with trillions of
6:08
dollars, had to cancel a meeting
6:10
because they couldn't find a big
6:13
room. This is the most elevated
6:15
form of BS I've ever heard,
6:17
Daniel. Well, it's disingenuous. This is
6:19
an incredibly important meeting where we're
6:21
deciding on vaccine recommendations. Yeah,
6:24
that's dishonest. And we'll get into
6:27
some more dishonesty later on. But
6:29
I don't think it's OK to
6:31
just blatantly lie like that. So
6:34
in the same talking about what
6:36
about science in the US, So
6:40
I get these New York Times emails, right,
6:42
where they give you like what's there to
6:45
read about in the day and I read,
6:47
you know, my New York Times emails early
6:49
this morning because one of my dogs may
6:51
have gotten into some stuff that she shouldn't
6:53
have gotten into. So at four something this
6:55
morning she was up having a bit of
6:57
a problem, a bit of a problem that
6:59
I actually stepped in. So
7:04
after hopping down the hall and washing my
7:06
foot and cleaning the floor and taking care
7:08
of her and being up since then, I
7:10
was reading some of these. But this I
7:12
had read a little bit earlier with a
7:14
completely clean, untinged foot. And
7:16
so there was a section by Benjamin
7:18
Mueller. And I'm going to read this.
7:20
Late last month when the Trump administration
7:23
froze government grants, a federal judge said
7:25
it couldn't just hold back money. Congress
7:27
had agreed to spend. But
7:29
spending at the NIH. which awards more
7:32
than 60 ,000 grants per year isn't
7:34
so simple. So this is going to
7:36
be this strain of let's undermine things
7:39
in a disingenuous dishonest way. So
7:42
new grants actually go through
7:44
a as he describes a
7:46
tortured bureaucratic process The agency
7:48
has to notice notify the
7:50
public of grant review meetings
7:52
in the federal register as
7:54
a government publication Then scientists
7:56
and NIH officials meet to
7:58
discuss the proposals the problem
8:00
is that the Trump administration
8:02
banned these announcements indefinitely so
8:04
no new research projects can
8:06
get approved so In effect,
8:08
scientists say the Trump administration
8:10
is circumventing the court order
8:12
with this bureaucratic trick. So
8:15
if you're a cancer doctor, we hope you're
8:17
happy that we've cracked that nut and you're
8:19
not really interested in any new treatments or
8:22
cures. Much like what RFK
8:24
Jr. is doing with vaccines, you
8:26
can undermine vaccines, you
8:29
can hobble cancer research just
8:31
by stalling this ability to
8:34
move things forward. You
8:36
can stall our ability to understand chronic
8:38
disease. And what you're doing
8:40
is you're saying, OK, yeah, Congress
8:42
controls the purse, but we're going
8:44
to break the system so you
8:46
can't actually get those funds out
8:48
there by basically hobbling the bureaucracy.
8:52
You know, Daniel, a smart lawyer can
8:54
get around this. OK, so that's what
8:56
they need to be doing. you're
8:59
obstructing congressional appropriations by
9:01
doing multiple things, fix
9:04
them all. That's it.
9:07
Yeah. No, and it's really, I mean, this
9:09
is what they did with PEPFAR is they
9:11
said, oh, okay, we're going to give special
9:13
letters of exemption. Those HIV
9:15
medicines can go out there. But
9:18
there's no computers. They shut down the
9:20
computer. So even if the HIV medicines
9:22
showed up somewhere, you wouldn't know who
9:24
gets what. Um, you know,
9:26
so they've just, they've figured out ways
9:28
to basically be sneaky and dishonest. So,
9:31
I mean, I'm trying not to be
9:33
political, but, uh, yeah, I mean, we,
9:35
we have, you know, it's, it's hard
9:38
to not be political when you have
9:40
people dying. Well, it's people's health at
9:42
stake and also the health of the
9:44
US science established. We have great, great
9:47
science here in the US. There's no
9:49
reason to break it. There's zero reason.
9:51
And if anyone in the US thinks
9:54
it should be broken, I'd like you
9:56
to tell me why. So
9:59
this is ridiculous. Yeah. No, I
10:01
mean, this is part of what makes America
10:03
great. We are the world leaders, and I'm
10:05
going to say this, world leaders in science
10:07
and have been for decades now. And do
10:09
we not want to do that? Do we
10:11
want to let someone else take over? Yeah,
10:14
that's a problem. A few individuals have
10:16
decided that we want to destroy it,
10:18
Daniel. That's what kills me. A few
10:21
individuals. Yeah. Yep.
10:25
But there has to be ways around it,
10:27
Daniel. We cannot give up. We're not going
10:29
to give up. And we're going to circle
10:31
back. We're even going to get more angry
10:33
in a few minutes. So Ebola, I
10:36
got some good news. We're going to pepper in
10:38
a little bit of good news. And then don't
10:40
worry, we'll be back to doom and gloom. As
10:42
suggested last week, we may have a win regarding
10:44
Ebola in Uganda. We hear
10:46
from the WHO that Uganda has
10:48
entered a crucial 42 -day countdown.
10:52
So what's going on here? 42 days
10:54
is twice the 21
10:56
days, the maximum incubation
10:58
period of Ebola, the
11:00
Sudan Ebola virus here.
11:03
And so if you can get
11:05
past that, if there's no further
11:07
infections during this period, then you
11:09
can confidently declare that the outbreak
11:11
is over. And I'm
11:13
hearing confirmation of this on the ground.
11:16
I was actually able to get to
11:18
the WHO website, so I don't know
11:20
what happened before. All
11:23
right polio a little bit about
11:25
polio here the global polio eradication
11:27
initiative gpei Said on 24th of
11:29
February 2025 during the fourth riyadh
11:31
international humanitarian forum that Saudi Arabia
11:34
has formally committed 500 million dollars
11:36
to end global polio It's sort
11:38
of like they they reinforced like
11:40
yeah, we said we're gonna do
11:43
that. We're actually gonna really do
11:45
that But unfortunately Vincent I haven't
11:47
seen that they They've updated their
11:49
their thinking. It seems like, hey,
11:51
here's a lot of money for
11:54
a lot of more oral polio.
11:56
Yes, exactly what they're going to
11:58
do. And it's not going to
12:00
help eradicate anything because they're just
12:03
pouring more virus into the environment.
12:05
Yeah, it's a little bit disturbing
12:08
there. All right. Now,
12:10
this is where. where I actually
12:12
am quite upset. So I will
12:14
admit I try to try to
12:16
be balanced and calm. But this
12:18
is upsetting because as we're going
12:20
to get to in a moment,
12:22
a child's already died. And so
12:25
since we get Tuesday and Friday
12:27
updates from the Texas Health and
12:29
Human Services, we got this first
12:31
update on February 25th. And at
12:33
that point, the Texas Department of
12:35
State Health Services reporting on this
12:37
measles outbreak in the South Plains
12:39
region of Texas, kind of like
12:41
West South Texas. At that
12:44
time, 124 cases had been identified,
12:46
right? These are like identified confirmed
12:48
cases. 18 of the
12:51
patients have been We're going to
12:53
talk about that. Only five of
12:55
the cases are among vaccinated. But
12:57
I'm going to say five of
12:59
the cases, like this is starting
13:01
to be so much exposure that
13:03
we're actually even seeing vaccinated folks
13:06
be identified as having cases. But
13:08
the rest are basically unvaccinated or
13:10
no confirmation of vaccine. Now,
13:13
the CDC has said it
13:15
will provide only weekly updates.
13:19
But then we actually get an update
13:21
because something really upsetting happened. The
13:23
first child has died in the
13:25
Texas outbreak. The patient
13:28
was an unvaccinated school -aged
13:30
child, according to officials. As
13:33
we learn, most of the cases have been
13:35
centered in Gaines County, an area on the
13:37
western edge of the state. It's
13:40
home to thousands of men and knights,
13:42
which they describe as an insular Christian
13:44
group that historically has lower vaccination rates.
13:47
and officials said that the child who
13:49
died Wednesday had lived in Gaines County.
13:52
The last pediatric death in the
13:55
US for measles was in 2003.
13:58
It's been 22 years since this has
14:00
happened. We
14:03
read in an article here
14:05
in the measles book published
14:07
by Children's Health Defense. The
14:09
anti -vaccine nonprofit founded by
14:11
Mr. Kennedy wrote that measles
14:13
outbreaks have been fabricated to
14:15
create fear, leading government
14:17
officials to inflict unnecessary and
14:19
risky vaccines on millions of
14:21
children for the sole purpose
14:23
of fattening industry. profits. For
14:26
context here, for every 1
14:29
,000 children who get measles, One or
14:31
two will die. I'm going to say
14:33
acutely in the first couple of weeks,
14:35
according to CDC data. But
14:38
I was just re -listening
14:40
to immune 26. There's
14:43
a lot more to measles, right? So there
14:45
may be one or two who die in
14:47
the first couple of weeks. There may be
14:50
20%, we're actually seeing 40 % last year
14:52
of children end up in the hospital. But
14:55
the virus also harms the immune system.
14:57
So you actually see another increase in
14:59
mortality with the secondary bacterial infections that
15:02
are going to occur like after the
15:04
first one or two weeks. You're also
15:06
going to see an increased risk of
15:09
death in the two to five years
15:11
afterwards because you take these kids and
15:13
you basically wipe out their immune system
15:16
for a while. So
15:18
a 2015 study estimated that
15:20
before widespread vaccination, measles may
15:22
have accounted for as many
15:24
as half of all infectious
15:26
disease deaths in children. And
15:29
even now, right, the consequences can be
15:31
serious. So I want to,
15:33
I'm going to leave in a link here because
15:36
I don't want, you know, us to be saying,
15:38
oh, this is what RFK Junior said. But I'm
15:40
going to leave in a link where you can
15:42
actually watch RFK Junior speak at the cabinet meeting,
15:44
head of HHS. So he's, you know, he says
15:46
he's on top of this. So he says, two
15:48
people have died. That's incorrect, right? It's
15:50
supposed to be head of the HHS. He tells us
15:53
he's on top of this. He doesn't even know how
15:55
many children have died, whether it's one or two for
15:57
him is not a problem to have wrong. He
16:00
downplays the fact that this is
16:02
the first measles death in, I'm
16:04
going to say, 20 more years.
16:07
He goes on to say, it's
16:09
not unusual. We have measles outbreaks
16:11
every year. He then acknowledges
16:14
that children are being hospitalized. But
16:16
get this, he says that, you know, most
16:18
of the children being hospitalized are there for
16:20
quarantine purposes. I'm going to
16:23
say a comment that needs fact -checking, and
16:25
let's go ahead and fact -check that right
16:27
away. Let's go talk to the chief medical
16:29
office at Covenant Children's Hospital in Lubbock, Dr.
16:31
Lara Johnson, who says no. The
16:34
children who were hospitalized were admitted
16:36
because they were having trouble breathing.
16:39
They needed supportive care, such as
16:41
supplemental oxygen. And I
16:43
quote from Dr. Johnson, we don't
16:45
hospitalize patients for quarantine purposes. It's
16:49
unbelievable. I mean, it's
16:51
just, it astounds me. Here's the
16:53
head of HHS who told Cassidy
16:55
under oath a bunch of stuff.
16:58
And here, it's only been a couple of
17:00
weeks. Like normally when you have an outbreak
17:02
like this, when things are getting out of
17:04
control, the CDC comes in, they
17:07
help people get up to date. How do
17:09
we provide the best care? How do we
17:11
talk to these, you know, people in these
17:13
communities. You know, when we had
17:15
that issue with polio in upstate New York, you
17:17
know, people who normally wouldn't vaccinate said, okay, this
17:19
is different. We're going to jump in. But already
17:22
one child has died and this man's only been
17:24
in this position for what, two weeks? What
17:27
really bothers me is he said, we
17:29
have outbreaks all the time. Well, in
17:32
fact, we don't when we're
17:34
vaccinating people. Most of the country doesn't
17:36
have outbreaks. In fact, When
17:38
the vaccine was introduced in the 60s
17:41
or hundreds of thousands of cases a
17:43
year those slowly went down by 2000
17:45
was declared eliminated There were no more
17:47
outbreaks until the Wakefield business started getting
17:49
parents not to vaccinate in the US
17:51
So he's wrong on every front. He
17:53
doesn't read anything. He doesn't study He
17:55
didn't come prepared to that meeting doesn't
17:57
know anything that's going on. I mean,
17:59
can we get rid of him in
18:01
some way? I mean
18:03
I'm sort of I'm sort of hoping
18:06
that you know I mean how many
18:08
how many honestly how many children will
18:10
have to die before before the president
18:12
says listen you you just you can't
18:14
do this job you know you can't
18:16
have children in the U .S. dying
18:18
of measles and the person who's supposed
18:20
to be protecting our health the senior
18:22
person where the buck stops not thinking
18:24
it's a big deal. So just to
18:26
remind people that measles is bad stuff.
18:29
There was a thing on his side, I think we
18:31
talked about it last week. Hey, how
18:33
come no one talks about the good side of
18:35
measles? There's no good side of measles. Kids
18:38
get infected. They are incredibly miserable if
18:40
you've ever taken care of a child
18:43
with measles. posted
18:45
in this nice measles symptoms timeline that
18:47
I got from a sub -stack from
18:49
Dr. Emily Smith, great sub
18:51
-stack, just talking about
18:54
what goes on, how the
18:56
kids start off with cold
18:58
-like symptoms, then they develop
19:00
the famous coplic spots. then
19:03
they get the rash, and then
19:05
you start seeing pneumonia, ear
19:08
infections, diarrhea, some
19:10
kids go blind, ear infections,
19:12
some kids go deaf, encephalitis, and
19:15
then even years later, you
19:17
can have this subacute
19:20
sclerosing pancephalitis, which, you
19:22
know, 100 % mortality.
19:26
I mean, this is horrible. And as I
19:28
mentioned, it wipes out
19:30
all that immune memory that
19:32
you've earned, all that natural
19:34
immunity, all those vaccines, everything.
19:37
70 % of the antibody repertoire
19:39
is wiped out with one measles
19:42
infection in someone who's not vaccinated.
19:45
And I do want to point out
19:47
just that this is still a fringe.
19:49
This is still a fringe thing, right?
19:51
So we have a nice table here.
19:53
Maybe Dave, I'll have it up for
19:55
folks that, you know, if you look
19:57
at the different vaccines, you look at,
19:59
you know, diphtheria, tetanus, isoleopertosis, hepatitis A
20:01
or B, the MMR,
20:04
polio, chickenpox
20:06
vaccine, you know, the
20:08
percent completely vaccinated is actually
20:10
quite high when you look
20:12
at. Texas kindergartens. And
20:14
then if you actually look at the
20:16
state, I mean, we're 94, 95
20:19
% and above. But then there are
20:21
these pockets, right? And we see pockets.
20:23
And so really, there are these communities
20:25
where we don't have that. And one
20:27
of the problems, like why do we
20:29
care if your kids are vaccinated or
20:31
not, is this is an incredibly contagious
20:34
disease. And so think about all those
20:36
children under the age of one who
20:38
are not old enough to get the
20:40
protection. putting them at
20:42
risk. Think about pregnant individuals.
20:45
They're at risk. So yeah, this is one
20:47
of those things. Your freedom to wave your
20:49
arms ends at the tip of my nose.
20:52
Your freedom to, you know, spread
20:54
a deadly disease is something that
20:56
we really have to talk about
20:58
when we live in a community.
21:01
I remember what I was going to say. There
21:03
are pockets of unvaccinated kids here in New York
21:06
City. Right, it's the same
21:08
everywhere and it's just a matter
21:10
of the virus being introduced in
21:12
them and then you will have
21:14
an outbreak Yeah, mean we had
21:16
that outbreak in in a community
21:18
in Brooklyn not too many years
21:20
back. Yeah, that's right Yeah, yeah
21:22
All right Very disturbing very disturbing
21:24
and you know, maybe maybe people
21:26
need to see those You know
21:28
those little kids like you know
21:30
struggling to breathe being brought into
21:32
the hospital, you know when RFK
21:35
Junior seems not to actually care.
21:37
All right, bird flu. A few
21:39
things here. And maybe
21:41
there's some good things here. Maybe we'll
21:44
see. So I thought the first article,
21:46
will the egg shortage affect flu shots?
21:48
It's a little encouraging. Millions of vaccine
21:50
doses are made using chicken eggs each
21:52
year. This is actually a
21:54
nice article where they really go into
21:56
the fact that there's a whole biosecurity
21:58
around hens and egg production. And
22:01
then even if that fell apart, we
22:03
have other options like recombinant flu vaccine,
22:05
flu block, and the cell -based vaccine.
22:07
flu cell backs. So I'll
22:09
leave out link into that. Another,
22:12
this was an opinion piece in the Wall
22:14
Street Journal. I'm going to do a couple
22:16
Wall Street Journal ones here, which came first,
22:18
the chicken slaughter or the egg shortage. I
22:20
thought that was clever. And
22:23
here they discuss options, including vaccinating
22:25
the hens. But really the thing
22:27
I want to point out here,
22:29
and I think people just want
22:31
to hear people talking, I don't
22:33
think they understand highly. pathogenic avian
22:35
influenza. If chickens get
22:37
infected, if your flock of hens
22:39
get infected, 90 to 100 percent
22:41
of those birds will be dead
22:43
within 48 hours. And it's a
22:45
horrible death for those birds. So
22:48
many of the veterinarians, when they're talking
22:50
about these, you know, killing the chickens
22:52
in mass, part of it is gassing
22:55
them is just that it's just inhumane
22:57
to let them suffer and to have
22:59
this almost 100 percent mortality. I'm
23:02
going to leave in a link to
23:04
the CDC page. Avian influenza in birds
23:06
causes and how it spreads. And here
23:08
you get that reference to that 90
23:11
% to 100 % mortality. And
23:13
they actually go through a lot of,
23:15
I'll say, sort of important information. But
23:17
they do talk about the fact that,
23:19
yeah, what's happening is that 90 %
23:22
to 100 % of these chickens are
23:24
going to die horrible death within 48
23:26
hours. Now, the ducks that are flying
23:28
over and spreading it They're actually usually
23:30
doing pretty well. They don't actually get
23:32
particularly sick at all. So
23:34
some wild bird species seem to
23:36
be able to get infected with
23:39
these particular, you know, say highly
23:41
pathogenic in chicken virus subtypes, but
23:43
they tend to spread it. So
23:45
I think it's important to understand
23:47
the disease before I heard a
23:49
news commentator saying, well, maybe, you
23:51
know, we just need to let
23:54
the hens just all get natural
23:56
immunity. Brilliant. Yeah, wasn't that brilliant? Let
23:59
our hens, let our little
24:01
girls just develop that robust,
24:03
wonderful, natural immunity. I don't
24:06
think they've ever seen a
24:08
group of hens get avian
24:10
influence. It's horrible. It's horrible,
24:12
and there's lots of suffering.
24:15
But we do have, and I
24:17
was impressed by this, Agriculture Secretary
24:20
Brooke Rollins has a five -point
24:22
plan to lower egg prices. And
24:25
I'm just going to run through this, and I'll leave in a link.
24:28
So first, dedicating, are
24:30
you ready for this? up to
24:32
500 million to help protect US
24:35
poultry producers with gold standard biosecurity
24:37
measures. They actually create a way
24:39
to protect the birds from those
24:42
introductions, right? So, you know, when
24:44
you're entering or exiting where the
24:46
hens are, you put on special
24:49
suits, you wash stuff down, you
24:51
create these barriers to keep the
24:53
ducks and migrating. foul
24:55
away from your hands. Second
24:58
is providing up to $400
25:00
million of increased financial assistance
25:02
to help the farmers whose
25:05
flocks have been affected, so
25:07
help them get back to
25:09
safe operations after an outbreak.
25:11
And this was shocking, Vincent.
25:14
Third, USDA is exploring the
25:16
use of Vaccines
25:18
and therapeutics for laying
25:21
chickens. They
25:23
say, well, vaccines aren't a standalone
25:25
solution. We will provide up
25:27
to $100 million in research and
25:29
development of vaccines and therapeutics, saying
25:31
this should help reduce the need
25:33
to depopulate flocks, right? Because if
25:35
your hands are vaccinated and then
25:38
they get an exposure, you're not
25:40
going to have that 90 %
25:42
to 100%. Death
25:44
or 100 % if we if we continue
25:46
to you mainly address this fourth They say
25:48
they're gonna take other actions to lower the
25:50
price of eggs I think this is they're
25:52
gonna remove regulatory hurdles And actually if you
25:55
look in closely what they're gonna do is
25:57
like right now there are rules like come
25:59
on These are animals and they should have
26:01
at least a certain amount of space around
26:03
them and they're like yeah You don't need
26:05
so much space cram them closer together. The
26:08
chickens don't need to be happy. We just
26:10
need those eggs Yeah.
26:12
Then we'll get one egg for chicken. Just great.
26:14
That just bothered me. Yeah. It was like, listen,
26:16
I think we're being too nice to the hens.
26:19
I mean, I don't know. Have you ever seen
26:21
a mass hen, you know, where
26:23
they burn off the, you know, the beaks?
26:25
Okay. And fifth, and this is, I don't
26:27
think going to make too many people happy.
26:30
This idea that we're going to make America
26:32
great by importing eggs from other countries. Yeah.
26:35
I heard we're buying some from Turkey now.
26:39
Turkey eggs. Daniel,
26:42
I don't know that this vaccine
26:45
makes any sense. It doesn't prevent
26:47
transmission. So it's not going to
26:49
protect the flock. I
26:51
guess what the idea is, it won't
26:54
necessarily protect spread. But if you always
26:56
say, OK, we're going to have all
26:58
our hens in America vaccinated, if the
27:00
flu gets into the population, now
27:02
getting an infection after being vaccinated is much
27:04
more mild. We always say it's not going
27:06
to keep you from getting infected. but
27:09
it is going to reduce the
27:11
disease. So vaccinated chickens don't all
27:13
die from highly pathogenic avian influenza.
27:16
All right, but they still have virus. Maybe
27:18
it gets into the eggs. They
27:21
better just be bloody careful. It sounds
27:23
like they don't really know what they're
27:26
talking about. This 500
27:28
million for biosecurity, I don't think that's anywhere
27:30
near enough. Yeah, it sounds
27:32
like a big number, but just think
27:35
about the... What is it, over 300
27:37
million? I think it's like we need
27:39
350 million egg laying hens to sort
27:42
of meet our capacity. That's like, yeah,
27:44
a buck a bird. Not
27:46
a lot of money in a country our size.
27:48
Folks, give up your eggs and you can blame
27:51
the administration. All
27:54
right. So flu is still
27:56
really high. Influenza A
27:58
is still at high levels. Looking
28:00
across the country, we're still seeing hot
28:03
spots most everywhere. Actually, even Montana actually
28:05
was doing a little better. It was
28:07
getting into the minimal. It's back up
28:09
into the moderate. What's
28:12
really disturbing is that we used to get
28:14
weekly updates on what's going on. And one
28:16
of the things I would always look for,
28:18
because it just seemed to motivate people, is
28:20
seeing how many children had died the last
28:22
week. And this has not been updated since
28:24
February 7. That was the week when we
28:26
had 10 children die. So we don't really
28:28
get that updated. That's a problem to me,
28:31
that we don't get the information we would
28:33
like. But maybe we're coming
28:35
off the peak. I mean, we're still
28:37
really high. It looks like we're coming
28:39
off the peak. Our hope is that
28:41
we don't get that second. hump, which
28:43
we sometimes get. And I worry, right?
28:45
Because here we are end of February,
28:47
early March. We're going to start to
28:49
see spring break. So do the kids
28:51
come home, go back, and do we
28:53
get that rebound that we sometimes get
28:55
when school vacation timing is associated? Daniel,
28:58
what's the purpose of withholding
29:00
information? Is it to have an
29:02
uninformed population so they don't know what's happening? I
29:06
mean, there's different reasons why you
29:09
might want to do it. So
29:11
one is there's the concern that
29:13
if people think like, hey, things
29:15
are kind of bad out there
29:17
that might affect the stock market.
29:19
Some people like everyone to be
29:22
optimistic and positive. And if you
29:24
know that something is going on,
29:26
then maybe you'll be a little
29:28
bit negative or pessimistic. Maybe it'll
29:30
influence consumer spending or something. So
29:32
yeah, the other is that an
29:34
uninformed population Yeah, it's
29:37
dangerous thing. This is bad to
29:39
have to be withholding information from
29:41
your from your constituents. Only bad
29:44
things can happen. It's going
29:46
to leak out and then you're not going to know where to
29:48
believe it. And it's going to be a mess. Yeah.
29:50
And we'll we'll see in the modern world
29:53
of, you know, social media and misinformation. Like,
29:55
can you keep spinning? Can you keep lying
29:57
to people? You know, what is
29:59
it? Lie to me once, like, you know, lie
30:01
to me twice and then the third time. And
30:04
you know this is also another thing like
30:07
so we're huge proponents of education You know
30:09
and I know people like oh with the
30:11
with the vaccines there were mandates and they
30:13
were out there and no money was spent
30:16
on education So I was really excited when
30:18
the CDC had that I'm gonna say wonderful
30:20
flu educational series the wild to mild campaign
30:22
remember this Vincent with like do the Lions
30:24
or the shark turns into a goldfish the
30:27
lion turns into a little kitty cat And
30:29
I thought it was great because he was
30:31
really I think what RFK had talked about.
30:33
He wants people to be able to make
30:36
decisions. He wants them to have the information.
30:38
And this was really informative. This was forget
30:41
about this whole idea that a flu vaccine
30:43
will mean you never get the flu. It's
30:46
going to reduce severity. It's going
30:48
to reduce disease. This was great
30:50
stuff. Well. the Trump administration yanked
30:53
the CDC flu vaccine campaign. Now,
30:56
unfortunately, this is like what's typical. The
30:58
news was shared with staff during a
31:00
meeting. And then two of
31:02
the staffers who were not actually
31:04
supposed to tell anyone that this
31:06
was ending, agreed to speak, you
31:08
know, with anonymity, know, as
31:11
long as you can, you know, guarantee my anonymity
31:13
as long as you don't tell who's telling you
31:15
this. So, yeah,
31:17
it's disgusting that they would cancel a
31:19
campaign that's meant to inform people about
31:22
the value of the vaccine. It is
31:24
just disgusting that this administration does this.
31:28
Okay, RSV. We're actually
31:30
still high with RSV.
31:33
So that's kind of across the board, but
31:35
maybe a little bit of good news. You
31:37
ready for this? COVID dropped to medium. I
31:39
was wondering, like, does the wastewater have the
31:42
ability to drop from high? Will we ever
31:44
drop? And we're actually seeing a drop in
31:46
the amount of wastewater SARS -CoV -2. So
31:49
we're starting to drop. We've got our
31:51
map here where most of it is
31:53
kind of moving into the less than
31:56
2 % of the deaths we're seeing
31:58
are due to COVID. And we seem
32:00
to be coming off the peak here
32:02
with the CDC data on the national
32:05
trend. So nationally, we're starting to come
32:07
down. I don't see our nice chart
32:09
with all the colors in the ups
32:11
and downs for all over the country.
32:13
What happened to that? You can click
32:16
on that here. I'm going to paste
32:18
it in in real time. Let's go
32:20
here, Vincent. it's still there. We
32:22
have to click on it. No, we'll do it.
32:24
Because what you're going to see as I paste
32:26
it in, this will only take seconds, is
32:29
that it got a
32:32
little bit busy. You
32:35
know, depending on which part of the country.
32:37
All right, so we're almost to pasting in
32:39
it. And what you're going to say when
32:42
I paste this in as I get back
32:44
to our episode, are you ready, Vincent? I'm
32:46
ready. Yeah, see excitement. And maybe this is
32:48
something that will be painted up there by
32:50
David from the look out on YouTube. So
32:53
across the country, we're starting to go down. I'm
32:55
trying so hard to be optimistic. But then you're
32:57
like, but in the Midwest, it's starting to go
32:59
back up again, isn't it? So I didn't want
33:01
to show that. Well, I started to
33:04
know if it's going up or it's just plateau. Most
33:07
of them are plateauing, it seems to me.
33:09
Yeah. See, I'm trying to get the stock
33:12
market to go up and can't keep spreading
33:14
all this, you know, the bad news, the
33:16
truth. All right. So now
33:18
we're going to talk about COVID vaccines. Oh,
33:20
my gosh. And this is
33:22
this article. And this
33:24
is, I thought was really interesting, caught my
33:26
eye. Effectiveness of the original. Monovalent
33:29
Mesture RNA coronavirus disease COVID -19
33:31
vaccination series against hospitalization for COVID
33:33
-19 associated venous thromboembolism. So enough
33:35
people remember in the early days,
33:37
it was this, you know, came
33:39
out of China, don't give anyone
33:41
anticoagulation because COVID -19 is associated
33:43
with people just bleeding out. And
33:46
then so initially nobody anticoagulated. We're
33:48
like, what's going on? I remember
33:50
one day at Plainview Hospital where
33:52
we did these CAT scans looking
33:54
for pulmonary in like 20 patients
33:56
and 15 of them had had
33:58
clots somewhere this is where we're
34:00
like just that's ridiculous and also
34:02
I know it disturbs some of
34:05
the researchers because they're like we
34:07
need to do trials we're like
34:09
we can't do trials when 75
34:11
% of our patients are dying
34:13
of these clots we're gonna actually
34:15
start anticoagulating. Anticoagulation will be
34:17
our standard of care and your trial
34:20
can be deviating from that. We were
34:22
accused of witchcraft, but anyway, we
34:25
were accused of witchcraft by these
34:27
PIs sitting at their home drinking
34:29
wine, dosing their wives with ivermectin
34:31
and hydroxychloroquine, but we won't go
34:33
there. So
34:36
they use a test negative design
34:38
to basically say, are the COVID
34:41
-19 vaccines going to protect folks
34:43
from getting these deep venous clots?
34:46
So they look at
34:48
18 ,811 patients, 9
34:51
,792 are admitted with
34:53
vaccinations. They got 44
34:55
% vaccinated. And
34:58
then they've got a group of
35:00
these test negative controls, also with
35:02
73 % of those are vaccinated.
35:05
Now, among the patients, they're going to do
35:07
all the calculation here. They
35:10
end up seeing that
35:12
the venous thromboembolism, these
35:14
deep clots, were significantly
35:16
more common in unvaccinated
35:18
than vaccinated. It's about
35:20
a 50 % reduction, and
35:22
it varies with the different
35:24
variants. So you end up,
35:26
when you do the calculation,
35:28
you're seeing an 84 % overall
35:31
protection with vaccines, seeing about 88
35:33
% for alpha, 93
35:35
% for delta, and then what
35:37
drops us down still, 68 %
35:39
for the Omicron variants. Gee.
35:43
They work. Yeah,
35:46
not only do they protect you from severe disease,
35:48
but they protect you from getting pulmonary emboli and
35:50
getting these clots. This has
35:53
really actually changed in a lot
35:55
of ways our practice when it
35:57
comes around to anticoagulation in the
35:59
hospital, where we're usually recommending a
36:02
prophylactic, because we've got pre -existing
36:04
immunity in many cases from vaccines
36:06
protecting. Can people continue
36:08
to pick on these vaccines,
36:10
saying they're pathogenic with all
36:13
kinds of nonsensical data, yet
36:15
they work? Yeah. I
36:17
mean, the problem is, if you actually
36:19
want the truth, here it is. If
36:21
you want to support some agenda, some
36:23
bias, some conspiracy theory, then yeah, you
36:26
can go get some fake news. All
36:29
right, early viral phase. Do
36:32
you remember the days of hydroxychloroquine
36:34
and ivermectin? They're coming back. I
36:37
thought they never left. Yeah, they
36:39
sort of went down and then came back.
36:41
So we have this article, demographic
36:44
variation in US outpatient hydroxychloroquine
36:46
and ivermectin used during the
36:48
COVID -19 pandemic. And
36:50
here they use insurance claims. from
36:53
this big database with over 8
36:55
million patients, all 50 states. Basically,
36:58
you know what happened? These
37:01
two unproven treatments that were
37:03
touted as COVID -19 treatments
37:05
during the pandemic, we saw
37:08
that there was a doubling
37:10
in the prescriptions for hydroxychloroquine
37:13
and ivermectin increased. tenfold.
37:17
And I want to add, we still get
37:19
people asking for, oh, I need Ivermectin for
37:21
my COVID, you know, or it's
37:23
really like the sun in Florida calling,
37:25
my dad better get Ivermectin for his COVID
37:28
-19. Or I even had a gentleman
37:30
recently asked for Ivermectin for his heart
37:32
failure. It's become a snake oil cure all.
37:35
And what do you do? I
37:38
have a nice respectful
37:40
conversation. I share the
37:42
information. I've never really
37:44
had it not work out for
37:46
them, following my sage advice at
37:48
the end of the day. But
37:51
I've just been lucky because I've
37:53
certainly been peripheral to some conversations
37:55
that did not go quite so
37:57
well. All
37:59
right. Paxilovid. This
38:01
is a big one, Vincent. This is
38:04
a huge, huge trial. I actually was
38:06
surprised when I saw that this, you
38:08
know, was being done and came out.
38:10
But this is a randomized control trial,
38:13
a phase three randomized control trial, the
38:15
article, alleviation of COVID
38:17
-19 symptoms and reduction in
38:19
health care utilization among high
38:21
-risk patients treated with neurotralovir,
38:24
ritanovir, a phase three randomized
38:26
trial published in CID. So,
38:28
yeah. Phase 3 randomized
38:31
trial, we're still doing these. And
38:34
so these are the results
38:36
from this double -blind randomized
38:38
one -to -one study that
38:41
assessed Paxilovid versus placebo for
38:43
five days in high risk,
38:46
unvaccinated, non -hospitalized symptomatic adults
38:48
with COVID -19 from 343
38:50
sites across 21 countries. among
38:54
2 ,113 randomized patients
38:56
enrolled from July 2021
38:58
through December 2021. We
39:01
ended up with 977 get
39:04
Paxilovid, 989 getting placebo. The
39:08
Nermitrelvir, the Paxilovid,
39:10
significantly reduced two things,
39:13
times to sustained alleviation
39:15
by two days, so
39:17
13 from 15, and
39:19
resolution, basically. completely gone,
39:22
not just alleviated, not
39:24
just reduced, but completely
39:26
resolved. And that
39:28
was from 19 days, shortening that
39:31
time to resolution to 16 days,
39:33
and significantly reduced the number of
39:35
COVID -19 related medical visits and
39:38
the proportion of patients with such
39:40
visits. Now, hospitalized
39:42
patients treated with Paxilovid, right, so you
39:44
end up with those, they had shorter
39:47
stays. None of them ended up
39:49
in the ICU. None of them
39:51
required mechanical ventilation. All were discharged
39:53
to home or self -care. And
39:57
fewer of the Paxilovid treated patients required
39:59
any additional treatment. No
40:01
Paxilovid treated patients died through week
40:04
24 compared to 15 that died
40:06
in the placebo group. are
40:10
the ages here? Do you know, roughly?
40:12
So they're mostly going to be older
40:14
folks because remember this is going to
40:16
be your high risk folks. They're
40:19
mostly unvaccinated. So
40:22
65, 70 years and older.
40:25
Yeah. Yeah, they have
40:27
a nice graphical
40:29
abstract. We get a little bit more information
40:31
here. We sort of break down different things
40:34
like ER visits, going to see your doc,
40:36
going to the urgent care. You
40:38
can see some Kaplan -Meier curbs over time.
40:41
You know, the big thing here I think is, so
40:44
yeah, we already knew that Paxlovid reduces your
40:46
chance of death. We knew it reduces your
40:48
chance of ending up in the hospital. But
40:50
there was always kind of this discussion that we
40:53
didn't want to say. I remember you were saying
40:55
last time, Vincent, that when you
40:57
had COVID, you started Paxilovid. By the
40:59
next day, you felt great. I had
41:01
that same experience. I went to the ASTM and
41:03
H conference. I took a risk. I came back.
41:05
My throat was a little scratchy. I was about
41:07
to go for a run. I don't know if
41:09
I was going to record it on Strava or
41:11
not. I was like, no, I was at this
41:13
big meeting. I should just probably check. And
41:16
it was positive. And I started Paxilovid right
41:18
away. By the next day, I had zero
41:20
symptoms. Don't tell my wife, because I still
41:22
spent five days working on the next textbook
41:25
of parasitic disease as a recluse, keeping her
41:27
safe. So yeah, there
41:29
is all this sort of anecdotes of
41:31
people starting Paxilovid and feeling better quicker.
41:34
Here's actually some data. Here's some data that,
41:36
yeah, actually it looks like that's the case.
41:38
People feel better quicker when we start Paxilovid.
41:40
So this is probably helpful because we have
41:42
docs out there. I don't know. People get
41:44
Paxilovid and then they feel worse and they
41:46
have rebound. Actually, the
41:48
sciences that people that take Paxilovid,
41:50
they feel better quicker. And
41:53
even if they have those issues during
41:55
the second week, as we've discussed, a
41:57
90 % reduction in the severity of
41:59
those symptoms during the second week. So
42:02
this is a huge
42:05
study, right? Thousands
42:07
of patients. I remember I sent
42:09
you yesterday some study saying there's no
42:11
help in older hospitalized patients, but this
42:13
contradicts that. Well, if you look closely
42:15
at that other study and I really
42:17
thought it was not only was it
42:19
a bad study but that the headlines
42:21
were bad So one of the things
42:23
to be a little closely at that
42:25
study said, you know early on we
42:28
were seeing an absolute reduction in you
42:30
know mortality and progression of 5 %
42:32
now the absolute reduction is only 1
42:34
% You still were seeing the reduction
42:36
They were just saying like when you've
42:38
got a high -risk population that you
42:40
know, you're gonna end up with like,
42:42
you know, I don't know what what
42:44
the you know, let's say it's 20
42:46
% of people early on were ending
42:48
up in the hospital and you reduce
42:50
that 20%, you know, you get an
42:52
absolute reduction. They're saying now that people
42:54
are vaccinated, they're not getting like, you
42:56
know, poisoned with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin quite
42:58
so much, you know, now maybe it's
43:00
like 2 % of people are going
43:02
to end up going to the hospital.
43:04
So you reduce that, you know, so,
43:06
you know, it's the number needed to
43:08
treat has grown, but Paxloven still works.
43:11
Yeah, I mean, they were saying the headline said
43:13
doesn't work at all, which is not
43:16
correct. It does work. And
43:18
so even though it may be reduced,
43:20
you're still going to use it because
43:22
you can still save lives. Yeah.
43:24
It's like airbags, you know, are much more important
43:26
when you're doing, you know, 100 miles an hour
43:28
on the Audubon, but they're still pretty good at
43:31
55. Yeah. Right. All
43:34
right. So Paxilobid,
43:36
Remdesivir. malnupiravir, convalescent
43:39
plasma in certain circumstances.
43:42
And then that second week, right? We
43:45
can really reduce chances of folks ending
43:47
up here with vaccines and all these
43:49
other things we've talked about. But that
43:52
second week is still when we are
43:54
still seeing folks in the hospital. We're
43:56
still seeing the need in certain cases
43:59
for steroids, anticoagulation, pulmonary support, remdesivir,
44:01
and in some cases, immune modulation.
44:04
All right, and I just have a few
44:07
articles here in the last bit. So
44:09
this first article, Interventions for Long COVID,
44:11
a narrative review published in the Journal
44:13
of General Internal Medicine. Now, this is
44:16
behind a paywall. It's a little bit
44:18
annoying, right? It took me like I
44:20
had to wait till finally I could
44:22
access it through the Columbia site and
44:24
then I did. So I'll
44:26
go through a little bit. So they start with Comments
44:29
along COVID continues to impose
44:31
a significant burden on COVID
44:33
-19 survivors, presenting with
44:36
diverse symptoms and clinical uncertainty.
44:38
We have talked about the fact that now
44:40
it's probably about one to two percent of
44:42
folks after. on acute
44:45
COVID versus early on, it was
44:47
like 15 or 20 people were
44:49
still sick at three months. So
44:51
that's much better, but still 1
44:54
% of hundreds of thousands of
44:56
people getting infected all the time.
44:58
So now the review looked at
45:00
evidence from 97 studies, including 26
45:03
randomized controlled trials, 15 non -randomized
45:05
comparative studies, looking at the effectiveness
45:07
and comparatives of different interventions. There's
45:11
actually a nice table and so which this
45:13
wasn't behind a paywall because it would be
45:15
nice for for clinicians and maybe patients to
45:17
be able to look at some of these
45:19
tables. Some of the different
45:21
things that were studied like they
45:23
talked about that that probiotic sim
45:25
01 study that we talked about
45:28
where they had certain effects on
45:30
brain fog and fatigue. They
45:32
talked about some of the vagal stimulation
45:34
they talked about. some
45:37
of the now Trekzone studies and
45:39
they actually have, here's the intervention,
45:41
here's the studies that we saw,
45:43
here's what it showed. So it's
45:45
a good paper for people to
45:47
look at, but it's long, the
45:49
tables stretch, and it's behind
45:51
a paywall. So that's just, but
45:54
I'll leave in a link and. We
45:56
also have JAMA Network Open, the
45:59
article, COVID -19 Vaccination and Odds
46:01
of Post -COVID -19 Conditioned Symptoms
46:03
in Children, aged 5 to 17.
46:06
Case Control Studies, 622
46:08
participants. And yes,
46:10
vaccines were associated with a 57
46:12
% decreased odds of one or
46:14
more post -COVID conditions and a
46:17
73 % decreased odds of two
46:19
or more post -COVID conditions. So,
46:21
you know, people are always saying,
46:23
I don't know, vaccines for the
46:25
little kids. Yeah, I
46:27
mean, this is the issue for the
46:29
little kids. It's the post -COVID conditions.
46:31
It's the months of not being able
46:34
to get back to school. It's the
46:36
months of headaches, fatigue, learning challenges, and
46:38
we're seeing pretty good protection here with
46:40
the vaccines. And,
46:42
you know, hey, I understand, I don't
46:44
know, mRNA vaccines in my children, maybe
46:47
there's some misinformation here, but we've got
46:49
Novavax, right? And Novavax is authorized for
46:51
use in individuals 12 years of age
46:54
and older. chunk of
46:56
these folks. You can go
46:58
ahead, traditional protein -based vaccine.
47:01
All right. And I will finish off, right?
47:04
No one is safe until everyone is safe. And
47:06
so I'm hoping, you know, these are tough times.
47:08
We're going to need your support, you
47:11
know, as we sort of
47:13
suggested last time. Yeah, we've
47:15
gotten... threats. People would like
47:18
some of our science communicators
47:20
to stop communicating. So
47:22
we may need your support to keep doing
47:24
what we're doing. We may need your support
47:26
for lawyers, right, Vincent? And
47:29
we're doing our Floating Doctors fundraiser
47:32
where February, March, and April, we're
47:34
a third of the... third of the way in.
47:37
We're going to do our fundraiser
47:39
hopefully to get up to a
47:41
maximum donation of $20 ,000 and
47:43
just a little update from on
47:45
the ground there in Panama where
47:47
I'm heading in a couple weeks.
47:49
Our clinic in La Sabana turned
47:51
out to be a great opportunity
47:53
as we had an occupational therapist
47:55
working with us who's able to
47:57
give in -depth attention to multiple
47:59
patients, particularly women needing pelvic floor
48:01
training and older patients with bladder
48:03
issues. I think this is nice.
48:06
It's not about just doling out medicines. She
48:09
also visited two young brothers with
48:11
progressive muscle weakness, provided environmental adaptations
48:13
and exercises that can help implement
48:15
to improve their quality of life.
48:18
We've got them connected to the hospital
48:20
system for specialist intervention. And
48:23
she'll continue consulting on these patients when she
48:25
returns to the state. So that's this great
48:27
thing about the connectivity is even when people
48:29
go, they can stay connected and keep helping
48:31
these folks. It's
48:34
time for your questions for Daniel. You
48:36
can send yours to Daniel at microbe
48:38
.tv. Louis writes, important,
48:41
more detailed data about
48:43
TB in Kansas City.
48:46
The perspective would be important
48:48
in characterizing what's happening there
48:50
for listeners. These are data
48:52
as of February 9th. The
48:54
recent TB cases in Kansas
48:56
City include both active TB
48:58
and latent TB infections. As
49:00
of January 31st, there are
49:02
67 confirmed active and 79
49:04
latent. associated with the outbreak
49:07
in Wyandotte and Johnson County,
49:09
so 176 apparent infections. Active
49:11
TB cases must be treated
49:13
while latent cases represent individuals
49:15
infected with M tuberculosis, but
49:17
without illness or being contagious.
49:20
They may be treated to prevent
49:22
activation at a later date based
49:24
on pretty clear clinical guidelines from
49:26
CDC. Excellent. Yeah,
49:28
thank you for sending us this. this
49:30
our way. I had a patient this
49:33
weekend. I should follow up on the
49:35
results here, but get the busy weekend,
49:37
covering a number of hospitals, get the
49:40
call that Mr. So
49:42
-and -so's. Sputum came back.
49:44
The culture is now growing acid
49:46
fast bacilli. So, you
49:49
know, we're worried about, you know, different
49:51
mycobacterial species. So I go over
49:53
and I talk to this gentleman. It
49:55
turns out he grew up in Western
49:57
Long Island or Brooklyn, as my parents
50:00
like to call it. And
50:02
I told him, I said, hey, here's
50:04
the result that came back. You know,
50:06
are you familiar with tuberculosis? That's what
50:08
people are concerned about here. He
50:10
was very familiar. He said, yeah, when I was
50:12
a kid, a lot of people had tuberculosis. His
50:16
daughter was there. What tuberculosis? Isn't
50:18
that gone? Isn't that in
50:20
the history books? And so it was
50:23
entertaining for me to let him teach
50:25
his daughter and son -in -law about
50:27
tuberculosis. And yeah, that may
50:30
have been a risk factor. This may
50:32
have been an individual who now has
50:34
some other things going on and the
50:36
immune system drops down and you get
50:39
infected 60 years before it stays latent
50:41
and then can activate. Another
50:43
thing that I worry about with
50:45
all the measles in Texas is
50:47
people will often end up losing
50:49
their ability to contain tuberculosis if
50:52
they're unvaccinated and get a measles
50:54
infection. Yeah. Julie
50:57
writes, I'm having trouble accessing
50:59
Pemgarta in New York City.
51:02
I'm 66, have bronchiectasis take, is
51:05
a thioprin for myasthenia gravis. I
51:07
always wear masks. I had three
51:09
COVID vaccines. I
51:11
forgot to mask. When
51:14
two men did work in my apartment in early December,
51:16
got COVID, I had Pax Lovid on hand
51:18
and took it immediately. My symptoms
51:21
were mild, but triggered a current flare of
51:23
MG symptoms, which I'm trying to manage with
51:25
my neurologist. My Columbia primary
51:27
care doctor prescribed more Pax Lovid
51:29
to have on hand and also
51:32
did an e -consult with respect
51:34
to Pem Guarda. And
51:36
basically, there's a statement from
51:39
Columbia Infectious Diseases, which said
51:41
it would be reasonable to
51:43
pursue Pamifibart, but access has
51:46
been limited. So
51:48
try prime infusions for Pamgarda. So
51:51
she got through to prime and
51:53
they sent her back to the
51:55
doc for prescription. And the doc
51:57
said, I'm going to request that
51:59
you meet formally with ID to
52:02
discuss the prescription. their questions regarding
52:04
efficacy, blah blah blah. Two
52:06
questions. Would you recommend Pemgarta for someone
52:08
in my position? And is the efficacy
52:11
of Pemgarta now in doubt? So
52:14
the efficacy is, I'm going to say
52:16
it's not in doubt, but let's talk
52:18
about what the data is. So when
52:20
this was studied, there was a particular
52:22
variant circulating at a time when it
52:25
was studied, we had a 75 %
52:27
reduction in medically attended symptomatic COVID -19.
52:30
So the data was good then. We
52:32
don't necessarily... check it again.
52:34
So I'm just to be
52:37
full disclosure there. But
52:39
yeah, what you're running into here is probably a
52:41
doctor who's not familiar with Pemgardia. They don't know
52:43
how to write the script. It's every three months.
52:45
They may not know the dose. They may not
52:47
know the frequency. It's
52:50
amazing how many hoops you're having to
52:52
jump through here just to get access
52:54
to a to a medication that has
52:56
this indication. Great group of ID docs
52:58
at Columbia, so when you do get
53:00
in to see one of my colleagues,
53:02
make sure you say hello. We
53:06
had a lot of questions
53:08
about measles vaccine boosters. Dome
53:10
writes, I saw
53:12
a post suggesting adults over 35 should
53:15
get MMR and Tdap boosters giving falling
53:17
vaccination coverage. Do you suggest this or
53:19
other boosters for adults? who believe they
53:21
are vaccinated kids only if you live
53:23
in certain high -risk areas. Should you
53:25
get your antibody checked before you do
53:28
this? You know,
53:30
it's interesting. We're not making this
53:32
recommendation across the board. It
53:34
is interesting. I have seen some recommendations like if you're
53:37
in a high -risk area or you're going to a
53:39
high -risk area, consider. We definitely
53:41
do titers on healthcare workers who, interesting,
53:43
are probably not as high -risk as
53:45
people living in these communities where we're
53:47
having outbreaks. So we don't
53:50
make that recommendation. There is the idea
53:52
that if you've had measles, if you've
53:54
got your MMR, that there's lifelong protection.
53:57
But remember, a lot of the data
53:59
came when we probably were still getting
54:01
boosted from exposures. So far, we're not
54:04
making this recommendation. Now, the TDAP is
54:06
a little different. We
54:08
are having issues with pertussis. So you
54:11
do want to, even though it's driven
54:13
by the tetanus, you do want to
54:15
periodically get that pertussis protection bumped up.
54:19
And Megan has a similar question. I
54:21
saw a CBS report that said
54:24
people born after 1957 but vaccinated
54:26
for measles before 68 are at
54:28
higher risk from a measles outbreak.
54:31
Is this true? Is
54:33
there anything I can do? Should I get
54:35
a booster? Check my titers. So,
54:38
Megan, yeah, this is like a
54:40
little subtlety window here. So, the
54:42
idea was... 1957, there was so
54:45
much measles that like everyone born
54:47
before 1957 probably got exposed, probably
54:49
got infected. So they have like
54:52
that, you know, that survivor protection.
54:55
But then we actually, we had a variation
54:57
in the measles vaccine. I think we were
54:59
only doing like a single shot. And so
55:01
there actually were a few measles outbreaks. I
55:04
remember my little brother was Fort Collins, Colorado.
55:06
He ended up like locked in his dorm.
55:08
And so yeah, there is this little window.
55:10
So if you fall in. that you should
55:12
go ahead and get that second MMR booster.
55:16
Daniel, I had measles as a kid probably
55:18
in the 60s before the vaccine. It
55:21
was awful. I was covered with the rash.
55:24
It was really bad. And
55:26
then I got vaccinated as soon as the
55:28
vaccine came out. So I feel I'm good.
55:30
I'm not doing it. Yeah, no, I would
55:32
say like for you, that would be a
55:35
perfect situation. And yeah, maybe a reminder, people
55:37
having me is miserable. I
55:39
mean, these kids like I've been in
55:41
I've been in areas where like kids
55:43
are dying of malaria and they just
55:45
they stop eating and they're listless. But
55:48
oh my gosh, the kid with measles
55:50
stands out. They're so miserable and they're
55:52
fussing and they're crying and it is
55:54
just crummy. I
55:57
mean, I had this one huge blister on
55:59
my belly. I remember I watched it every
56:01
day. Everything else went away. It was still
56:03
there. I still have a scar from it
56:05
today. Oh, their noses
56:08
are running. Their eyes are red. Everything
56:10
hurts. It's miserable. All right.
56:12
This is unfortunately redundant. But
56:14
Lisa was born in 61.
56:16
Should she get a measles
56:18
vaccine? Yeah, so she falls
56:20
right into that kind of
56:23
window. So, yeah, born after
56:25
57. But actually, let's
56:27
see, yeah, and then if you were
56:29
vaccinated before 68, so sort of, you
56:31
know, those are kind of your things.
56:33
Yeah, talk to your doctor about this
56:35
stuff. mean, I think that's one of
56:37
the things, I feel sort of too
56:39
bad about where medicine is gone. But,
56:41
you know, this idea, you come in,
56:43
what's your diagnosis? I mean, it's too
56:45
bad that we haven't created a better
56:47
opportunity for people just to schedule a
56:49
point with, hey, doc, I just want
56:51
to talk about my vaccine. am I
56:53
up to date and should I get
56:55
any boosters and I have questions? Because
56:57
if we don't create an opportunity as
56:59
MDs, as DOs, as other clinical providers
57:01
of having these discussions, don't worry, there's
57:03
some snake oil salesmen out there ready
57:05
to have that conversation. And they're
57:08
not actually gonna feel like they're gonna let the
57:10
truth stand the way of their good story. So
57:13
the second dose was recommended in
57:15
1989. So
57:19
I don't know where this
57:21
68 comes from, 1968. Do
57:25
you understand that? I think there was
57:28
a change in the vaccine. And
57:30
with the update in the vaccine, then it became
57:32
a two dose. And before that,
57:35
it was a single dose. Yeah. And
57:37
this is the whole discussion. And we should
57:40
probably have like an episode where it was
57:42
like, when we made that change, was it
57:44
a good idea to make that change? We
57:46
have just stuck with the original one. But
57:48
there are issues, right? We talk about this
57:51
that very rarely will people have issues with
57:53
measles vaccination. Like you
57:55
might have a couple febrile seizures
57:57
per 100 ,000 kids vaccinated. You
58:00
know and some kids will actually
58:02
get a rash after the measles vaccination
58:05
So yeah, there are some you know when they
58:07
make the choice the the current one as a
58:09
two series I think it's great the earlier one
58:11
that was a one -shot series. I believe If
58:13
I get this all right, Yeah All
58:16
right. Last one. Abulaziz
58:18
I took the meningococcal
58:20
polysaccharide vaccine A -C -Y -W,
58:22
my next Umrah. Do I
58:24
also need the meningococcal
58:26
B vaccine? Yes. So,
58:29
you get all those letters there,
58:31
You you got A, C, Y, W, you missin'
58:33
B, and B is something we
58:35
worry about for people heading Heading
58:37
to the Middle East for Umrah. That's
58:41
TWIV, weekly weekly clinical update
58:43
with Dr. Daniel Griffin. Thank you, Daniel.
58:45
Oh, thank you And everyone
58:47
be safe
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More