Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This
0:05
is
0:08
The
0:12
Guardian.
0:37
Your personal data is a goldmine for
0:39
hackers, and aura helps lock it down.
0:42
aura monitors the dark web, blocks data
0:44
brokers from selling your information, includes
0:46
a VPN for private browsing, and
0:48
a password manager to secure your
0:51
accounts before criminals break in. blocks data brokers from selling your information, includes a VPN for private browsing, and a password manager to secure your accounts
0:53
before criminals break in. For a
0:55
limited time, ORA is offering our
0:58
listeners a 14-day free trial plus
1:00
a dark web scan to check
1:02
if your personal information has been
1:05
leaked, all for free at ora.com/safety.
1:07
To sign up and start protecting
1:10
yourself and your loved ones. That's
1:12
a-u-r-a.com/safety. Check the site for
1:14
details. Walking
1:23
into the criminal courts in Paris
1:25
on Monday, Maureen Le Penne insisted
1:27
she was relaxed about what lay
1:29
ahead. She spent the weekend gardening
1:31
in her garden outside Paris saying
1:33
she felt completely cool and calm
1:35
and collected about this. She took
1:37
her seat on the front row
1:40
and quickly her mood changed. She
1:42
started to become more agitated when
1:44
she could see it was clear
1:46
that the judge was going to
1:48
find her guilty of this massive
1:50
system of embezzlement. The court
1:52
found the pen guilty of embezzling
1:54
millions in European Parliament funds as
1:56
part of a fake job scam
1:58
along with 24 others from her
2:01
National rally party. As the party's
2:03
leader, Le Pen received the harshest
2:05
punishment of the lot, a suspended
2:07
prison sentence, and a five-year ban
2:09
from public office, dashing her hopes
2:11
of a presidential run in 2027.
2:13
As the judge continued with a
2:16
verdict and it became clear that
2:18
she was going to be found
2:20
guilty, she turned to one of
2:22
her neighbours and whispered, Anquyap, incredible.
2:25
She stormed out of court and
2:27
went straight on the offensive. So
2:29
she immediately went on TV, she
2:31
was defiant, she was on the
2:33
attack. She said that she felt
2:35
it was a political decision and
2:38
that she would not submit to
2:40
such a denial of democracy. And
2:42
she said, and she reminded TV
2:44
viewers that millions of people vote
2:46
for her, she said, I didn't
2:48
think the judges would go as
2:50
far as to oppose our democratic
2:53
process and interfere with the choice
2:55
of the French people. Her treatment
2:57
was bad for running for five
2:59
years, and she's the leading candidate
3:01
at the fair, and I'm afraid
3:03
just scobu. Her treatment drew criticism
3:05
from allies around the globe, with
3:08
some leaders seeing themselves in her
3:10
plight. That's a very big deal.
3:12
I know all about it, and
3:14
a lot of people thought she
3:16
wasn't going to be convicted of
3:18
anything, and I don't know if
3:20
it means conviction. But she was
3:23
banned for running for five years,
3:25
and she's the leading candidate. She's
3:27
the leading candidate. Once
3:31
upon a time, really not that
3:33
long ago, being a convicted criminal
3:35
would put an end to any
3:38
political career. But in a world
3:40
where you can become president of
3:42
the USA, despite multiple felonies, maybe
3:44
even because of those felonies, could
3:46
Le Penne's conviction actually help her
3:49
far-right party rise to the very
3:51
top of French politics? From the
3:53
Guardian, I'm Helimpid. Today in focus.
3:55
Will Marine Le Penne's convictions make
3:58
her a martyr. Yeah.
4:02
Angelique Chrysophis, you are the Guardian's
4:04
Paris correspondent, it's been a big
4:06
week for French politics and you've
4:08
been in court following Marie Le
4:11
Pen's case over the past couple
4:13
of months and you've spoken about
4:15
her to us before, she is
4:17
the leader of course of the
4:19
National rally party which used to
4:21
be called the National Front when
4:23
it was run by her father
4:25
Jean-Marie Le Pen and she spent
4:27
years trying to detoxify the farright
4:29
party. next president of France and
4:31
then we come to this below
4:33
this week. Can you just start
4:35
by telling us what exactly have
4:37
Le Pen and her party members
4:39
been found guilty of? Marie Le
4:41
Pen and 24 other party officials
4:43
have been found guilty of a
4:45
massive embezzlement scheme on an unprecedented
4:47
scale and this is the embezzlement
4:49
of European Parliament. taxpayer money to
4:51
pay for parliamentary assistance, but in
4:53
fact those parliamentary assistance were not
4:55
doing their work for the European
4:57
Parliament. They were in fact working
4:59
for the party. So it was
5:01
a way to siphon off European
5:03
taxpayer money into the party coffers
5:05
in Paris. This was a scam
5:07
that was said to have gone
5:09
on for a long time between
5:11
2004 and 2016, and the evidence
5:13
was pretty damning, and much of
5:15
the political class were prepared for
5:17
her to be found guilty, but
5:19
what they weren't prepared for was
5:21
the scale of the sentence. Yeah,
5:23
I can imagine. Can you just
5:25
give us the fine details of
5:27
the sentence? The most dramatic part
5:29
of her sentence was a five-year
5:31
ban on running for public office,
5:34
which almost certainly, because it has
5:36
been delivered with immediate effect, means
5:38
that she can't run for the
5:40
presidency in 2027. She was also
5:42
given four years in prison, but
5:44
she won't go to prison while
5:46
she has appealed at this stage,
5:48
but half of those four years
5:50
are suspended, and the other two
5:52
would be wearing an electronic bracelet.
5:54
and she was also fined 100,000
5:56
euros. And you said that you
5:58
had listened to the evidence against
6:00
her and other party members and
6:02
that it did sound quite damning.
6:04
Were you surprised though just how
6:06
harsh the sentence is for her
6:08
in particular? Well, the sentence has
6:10
to be looked at in context.
6:12
There's been a lot of talk
6:14
in the last decade in France
6:16
of embezzlement fraud, corruption and so
6:18
on among politicians. Marie Le Pen
6:20
was of course the great anti-corruption
6:22
crusader herself calling for there to
6:24
be harsher laws against politicians who
6:26
do anything to do with financial
6:28
impropriety and saying that they should
6:30
be banned from public office for
6:32
life. But about nine years ago,
6:34
the rules were tightened because politicians
6:36
thought, well, judges aren't giving out
6:38
harsh enough. sentences. They're not banning
6:40
people from running for public office.
6:42
So legal observers, a lot of
6:44
lawyers and judges themselves say this
6:46
sentence, ban on running for public
6:48
office and with immediate effect, is
6:50
actually just them observing this tightened
6:52
law. What Le Pen and her
6:54
supporters have a problem with is
6:57
this idea of immediate effect. because
6:59
although she can appeal the verdict
7:01
and the other aspects of it,
7:03
the prison sentence, there's nothing she
7:05
can do about this ban with
7:07
immediate effect, so she feels it's
7:09
undemocratic, the judges say this is
7:11
totally justified, no one can have
7:13
immunity in violation of the law.
7:15
Yeah, and so have the judges
7:17
then effectively just ended Le Penne's
7:19
political career? Not her political career,
7:21
don't forget she's still a member
7:23
of parliament for Nor Padakaléle and
7:25
she can keep that... However, she's
7:27
almost certainly barred from running in
7:29
the 2027 presidential election, which she
7:31
and others say she was a
7:33
favourite for. However, there's a very
7:35
slim chance she could run, and
7:37
it depends on the timing of
7:39
any appeal. An appeal in France
7:41
usually takes 18 months to two
7:43
years. She wants to appeal right
7:45
now. Could that appeal be heard
7:47
before the spring 2027 presidential election?
7:49
Could she be found innocent and
7:51
could this immediate effect ban be
7:53
overturned? All of those factors would
7:55
have to happen for her to
7:57
suddenly sneak in with a last
7:59
minute candidacy for the presidency. So
8:01
she said that she's going to
8:03
appeal, come what May? Yeah, she
8:05
said she's coming out fighting. She
8:07
and the party won't hear of
8:09
any kind of plan B. They're
8:11
currently saying no, I'm going to
8:13
fight this till the end and
8:15
essentially she will be the candidate
8:18
with this hope that an appeal
8:20
could be heard in time. But
8:22
then of course she would have
8:24
to be found innocent of the
8:26
charges she's just been found guilty
8:28
of. Everything would have to be
8:30
overturned on appeal. Let's see what
8:32
happens. And you've heard the evidence,
8:34
do you think that that's likely?
8:36
Well the evidence in court was
8:38
particularly stark. What the judges were
8:40
looking at were were these people
8:42
who had these contracts to be
8:44
parliamentary assistants. Were they actually working
8:46
in the European Parliament? Some of
8:48
them were people that us journalists
8:50
knew, like, a very well-known bodyguard
8:52
from Marine Le Pen and Jean-Marie
8:54
Le Pen, and none of us
8:56
were ever aware that he was
8:58
a European parliamentary assistant. Obviously their
9:00
offices were raided and many email
9:02
communications were taken and some of
9:04
them were quite damning and there
9:06
was one supposed parliamentary assistant who
9:08
were supposed to have been working
9:10
for a member of the European
9:12
Parliament for four months when he
9:14
emailed Marie Lapen herself and said
9:16
I'd really like to see the
9:18
European Parliament and then I could
9:20
meet the member of the European
9:22
Parliament I'm attached to. and he
9:24
was supposed to have been working
9:26
there already. There was somebody else
9:28
who was supposed to have been
9:30
based in Brussels, who really never
9:32
went there. There was somebody else
9:34
who was supposed to be a
9:36
parliamentary assistant and had spoken once
9:38
on the phone to the Member
9:41
of Parliament in question in almost
9:43
a year. So it sounds like
9:45
the evidence against Marie Lappen was
9:47
not simply that she was the
9:49
most senior member of the party
9:51
presided over this corruption, but that
9:53
she was aware of it, given
9:55
that she had received at least
9:57
that email that you just mentioned.
9:59
Yes, the judges found that she
10:01
was at the heart of a
10:03
system of embezzlement and the prosecutor
10:05
said that her party had essentially
10:07
treated the European Parliament like a
10:09
cash cow that had a kind
10:11
of war machine to siphon off
10:13
money from it and certainly there
10:15
were details of meetings and so
10:17
on which showed the judges argued
10:19
that Marie Lapen was at the
10:21
centre of this. And she obviously
10:23
maintains her innocence but she's gone
10:25
further hasn't she in her criticism
10:27
of the judges? Yes, she has.
10:29
I mean, she says that this
10:31
is politically motivated and they were
10:33
deliberately trying to stop her running
10:35
from election and deliberately trying to
10:37
sabotage her career. And her party
10:39
president, Jordan Bardellas, called the judges
10:41
red judges, saying that this wasn't
10:43
a proper legal process and was
10:45
simply a political decision. Neither of
10:47
them talked much about the charges.
10:49
It has to be said. Red
10:51
judges. So Badeo is essentially suggesting
10:53
that the judiciary are a bunch
10:55
of communists that out to get
10:57
La Penn. Right. She has obviously
10:59
said that the sentence is an
11:01
affronts to democracy. Do you think
11:04
there is any truth in these
11:06
kind of assertions that the courts
11:08
that the judges have overstepped the
11:10
mark? Well, the panel of three
11:12
judges listened to this case for
11:14
nine weeks. They then backed up
11:16
their verdicts with 150 pages of
11:18
documentation and said that they simply...
11:20
were following laws voted in by
11:22
the French Parliament on the sentencing
11:24
of politicians who have found guilty
11:26
of embezzlement. And for those of
11:28
us who don't really know the
11:30
French judicial system, is it like
11:32
in America where judges can be
11:34
political appointees or are they completely
11:36
independent from the political system? They're
11:38
not voted in in any way.
11:40
It's a completely independent judicial system.
11:50
Let's talk a bit about the
11:52
reaction to this really dramatic day
11:54
in court. First of all domestically,
11:56
how have her domestic opponents responded?
11:58
celebrating her downfall? Not all her
12:01
opponents. Some of her opponents, for
12:03
example, her long-running opponent on the
12:05
left-wing Jean-Louis Jean-Jean has said, you
12:07
know, this should be decided by
12:09
the people, we shouldn't have this
12:11
kind of decision in court. Other
12:14
people have been harsher. Matthew Lefebb,
12:16
who's an MP for macron centrist,
12:18
said, you know, she's not a
12:20
victim of a political or judiciary
12:22
conspiracy, she's a victim of herself,
12:24
but the traditional right, Lere publicacosa
12:27
Sarko's old party, have been, have
12:29
been... pretty stern about it. Leauvogier, who
12:31
wants to run for head of that party,
12:33
is talking about it being not healthy
12:35
for democracy. Francois Xavier Bellamy, who's a European
12:37
Parliament member, said it was a dark
12:39
day for democracy, which of course echoes the
12:42
way Lippen is talking about it. That
12:44
does surprise me in some ways, because you
12:46
would have thought that they would be
12:48
delighted to see Lippen suffer in this way,
12:50
and also you wouldn't think that you'd
12:52
have sentress attacking the judiciary, would you? Times
12:55
have changed. And if we look beyond
12:57
France, what has the global reaction been? I
12:59
think the reaction beyond France is really
13:01
important politically for the French presidential
13:04
race, because in France, the French
13:06
presidential race, it's very important not
13:08
to be seen to be enthrall
13:10
to any kind of international... powers
13:12
in any international way and what's
13:15
happened is there's been an absolute
13:17
pylon of the kind of global
13:19
populist right in support of Marie
13:21
Lapen which in a way serves
13:23
Emmanuel Macron's charges against her that
13:26
she's part of this kind of
13:28
international reactionary group. So we've had
13:30
the obvious ones in Europe Hungary's
13:32
Victor Orban backing her. Vilders in
13:34
the Netherlands. Orban said, I am
13:36
marine, right? He was the first
13:38
person to come straight in with
13:40
that massive sign of support and
13:42
it goes further afield from Europe.
13:44
Bolsonaro said it was left-wing judicial
13:47
activism. But I think there's two
13:49
points here. The first is one
13:51
of the first people to comment
13:53
was the Kremlin who said, you know,
13:55
more and more European capitals
13:57
were trampling over democratic norms.
13:59
which carries a certain aspect of irony
14:02
in it, but is also not necessarily
14:04
serving Marilla Penn's party that well as
14:06
she's trying to distance herself from the
14:08
cosing up to Vladimir Putin of the
14:10
past. But I think the crucial thing
14:13
has come from the US. If you
14:15
look at the context of this, we've
14:17
had JD Vance's speech in Munich, where
14:19
he's talking about the EU kind of
14:21
rotting from within with an elite that's
14:24
using the judiciary against decent parties, like
14:26
we imagine the AFT in Germany and
14:28
the pens party, it's kind of democracy
14:30
by judges. And so when the verdict
14:33
dropped, Trump himself and Trump's entourage really
14:35
went to town with it. And we
14:37
had a message from Don Junior, Donald
14:39
Trump's son, on social media saying, are
14:41
they trying to show that JD Vance
14:44
was completely right about everything? And then
14:46
we had Elon Musk piling in. Of
14:48
course. Of course. And he said, you
14:50
know, when the radical left, I'm not
14:52
sure who he means by that, French
14:55
judges, I don't know, but when the
14:57
radical left can't win via... Democratic vote.
14:59
They abused the legal system to jail
15:01
their opponents and he said this will
15:03
backfire like the legal attacks on Donald
15:06
Trump. Trump took a while to reply
15:08
actually, but he then did eventually say,
15:10
you know, this sounds very much like
15:12
this country, drawing an absolute parallel with
15:14
his own legal problems, which of course
15:17
didn't stop him being elected or supported.
15:19
And he said, you know, this is
15:21
a very big deal. A lot of
15:23
people thought she wouldn't be convicted of
15:25
anything, which I don't think is actually
15:28
the case in France. I think even
15:30
her own party knew that they were
15:32
looking at convictions. But he said, you
15:34
know, this sounds very much like this
15:37
country like this country, this country, America,
15:39
America, America, America. message from Marie Le
15:41
Pen is that she has to be
15:43
quite cautious and she has been cautious
15:45
about Donald Trump. France is very much
15:48
its own country. It's facing massive tariffs,
15:50
wars with the US. You mustn't look
15:52
like you're selling out your own country's
15:54
interests for the US. And so I'm
15:56
not sure that Trump's comments necessarily serving
15:59
her, but certainly the global outrage she
16:01
has been very pleased to have that
16:03
reflect. back. And if you think about
16:05
Trump becoming the US president for the
16:07
second time in spite of so many
16:10
judgments against him, felonies that he was
16:12
found guilty of, and he still was
16:14
elected to the White House and seems
16:16
more powerful than ever, is there a
16:18
world in which all of this helps?
16:21
Lipen politically and that she can sort
16:23
of paint herself as some sort of
16:25
a scapegoat, you know, that the establishment
16:27
is so frightened of her that they
16:29
are just looking for any excuse to
16:32
bring her down. Well it feeds into
16:34
a victimisation narrative. It feeds into her
16:36
narrative that the system is against her,
16:38
that she and her party are outsiders,
16:40
and that everyone is ganging up against
16:43
her. So yes, and also you have
16:45
to remember that this hasn't damaged her
16:47
yet. So this investigation has been running
16:49
for 10 years, and during those 10
16:52
years, the party has gone from strength
16:54
to strength with her leading it. So
16:56
she's run for president in total three
16:58
times, and twice she's got into the
17:00
final round runoff. And in a last
17:03
runoff, she had a historic score with
17:05
13 million votes. This investigation has never
17:07
put voters off before and her party
17:09
argues very clearly right now that it's
17:11
actually going to bring support to them.
17:14
It may bolster her hardcore group of
17:16
voters but whether it will help her
17:18
reach out to other voters who she
17:20
needs or she or anyone in her
17:22
party needs to win the presidency is
17:25
another issue but certainly it could well
17:27
galvanize support. And
17:34
when I asked you earlier about how
17:36
her domestic opponents have responded, you know
17:38
that quite cautious note that Jean-Luc Melanchion,
17:41
if I've pronounced that correct, on the
17:43
left, you might have thought that he
17:45
would be celebrating her downfall, but him
17:47
saying actually didn't think that it's right
17:50
that these things are decided by the
17:52
courts and that really the voters should
17:54
have a chance to decide. He can
17:57
clearly see that there's a danger that
17:59
Le Penne will use this to her
18:01
advantage, do you think? Yeah, I think
18:04
that's very true. I think that's true
18:06
where we see in relative silence of
18:08
Emmanuel Macron's camp, because of course they
18:10
can't really be seen to making comments
18:13
on the digital system. But one thing
18:15
I would just say, which is perhaps
18:17
a quirk of French politics, is that
18:20
as Marina Pena herself has argued for
18:22
a decade. We're not the only ones
18:24
who did this. And so you can
18:26
sometimes read the reaction through what people
18:29
are facing themselves. So Francois Béru, who's
18:31
the centrist Prime Minister at the moment,
18:33
his party has already faced a trial
18:36
over similar issues on a much smaller
18:38
scale financially, it has to be said,
18:40
because Marine La Pen, we're talking about
18:43
losses to the European Parliament of about
18:45
4.5 million euros. But Bayou was cleared,
18:47
some of his party members were convicted,
18:49
and the state prosecutor has appealed that.
18:52
So he at some point will be
18:54
facing an appeal trial over similar charges,
18:56
and Jolic Meline Jean himself absolutely denies
18:59
any wrongdoing, but has also faced questions
19:01
over parliamentary assistance. Again, he denies any
19:03
wrongdoing, he's not facing a trial, but
19:05
there is a context to some of
19:08
these comments. Yeah, and I guess Lipen
19:10
is far from the only big dog
19:12
in French politics to have found themselves
19:15
on the wrong side of the law.
19:17
Didn't Sarkozy get done for something or
19:19
other? Oh, well, Sarkozy has faced myriad
19:22
court cases, and in fact, he's been
19:24
in the same courtroom that Marie Lipen
19:26
has been in, swapping hearings versus afternoon
19:28
hearings for a trial over presidential campaign
19:31
funding where he's alleged to have taken
19:33
money from Gaddafi in Libya. and the
19:35
state prosecutors asked for him to be
19:38
jailed for seven years. We won't have
19:40
a verdict on that for many months
19:42
to come. It sounds like French politics
19:44
is all a bit mucky doesn't it?
19:47
But back to Le Pen and her
19:49
party. As you said she can carry
19:51
on as an MP for as long
19:54
as this current parliament kind of limps
19:56
on but ultimately if she does have
19:58
to go who will replace her do
20:01
you think at the top of the
20:03
party? I think it's a very good
20:05
question. I don't think we necessarily know
20:07
the answer for sure. The obvious person...
20:10
who she's been training up to be
20:12
her right-hand man for years is Jordan
20:14
Baldella. He's 29. He's extremely young to
20:17
run for president. He's never worked in
20:19
any kind of job outside politics. He
20:21
joined the party's youth group. He's been
20:23
elected to the European Parliament twice and
20:26
he is seen as quite inexperienced. But
20:28
she argues that he could be a
20:30
good candidate. He certainly has the same
20:33
high poll ratings that she has. He's
20:35
very popular, particularly amongst younger people. He's
20:37
just done an autobiography, even though the
20:40
argument was he didn't have much to
20:42
say in it. And it sold 200,000
20:44
copies, and he's constantly signing books all
20:46
across France. It's massive on Tiktok. But
20:49
is that enough for a presidential race.
20:51
We're not sure. He says, look, I'm
20:53
not talking about this now. I backed
20:56
Marie La Penn's niece. She's left the
20:58
party. She's been... in dispute with Maureen
21:00
Le Pen before, she's coming back more
21:02
into the folds. If you think about
21:05
it, I'm not saying she could run,
21:07
but she's one to watch. This party
21:09
is 50 years old, so the national
21:12
rally, formerly the Faun-Nacional, and they've always
21:14
run a La Pen in a presidential
21:16
campaign, whether it's Jean-Marie La Pen, or
21:19
Maureen La Pen. This would be the
21:21
first time they ran without a La
21:23
Pen, if they do. higher wealth photos.
21:25
Because I guess that while he doesn't
21:28
have that instant Le Pen name recognition,
21:30
he also doesn't have all of that
21:32
unwanted baggage that comes along with it.
21:35
Because let's not forget, Marine Le Pen's
21:37
father was an unabashed racist and an
21:39
anti-Semite who called the Holocaust a detail
21:41
of history. Right, he's trying to row
21:44
back on that. Of course that is
21:46
Marine Le Pen's work to change the
21:48
image. of the party, if not the
21:51
content of the anti-immigration policies, has remained
21:53
the same, but this sort of jack-booted
21:55
anti-Semitic image, she's tried to change and
21:58
Jolan Bandela has been key to that.
22:00
He's of course just come back from
22:02
a historic trip to Israel to try
22:04
and caught the Jewish community back home.
22:07
Right. And so it sounds like she's
22:09
got protégé's kind of waiting in the
22:11
wings, but she has been such a
22:14
dominant figure in her own party. Do
22:16
you think that the party can survive
22:18
without her? I don't think there's any
22:20
question of her disappearing in any way,
22:23
because she could still come back after
22:25
the five years if this decision is
22:27
upheld. I don't think she's in any
22:30
way thinking of leaving politics at all.
22:32
Even if Jordan Madela was to win,
22:34
there could be some kind of interesting
22:37
combo where she endeavours to be appointed
22:39
his Prime Minister or a Minister in
22:41
government. You don't have to be elected
22:43
to have that role. Really, even if
22:46
you've got a criminal record, you can
22:48
still become the Prime Minister of France.
22:50
Well, this is the whole debate that's
22:53
currently ongoing about that. Some say yes,
22:55
some say no. I think there's no
22:57
question of her quitting politics. She runs
22:59
that part of this party has always
23:02
been run by one family, one person,
23:04
one Le Pen in a very, very,
23:06
very tight ship. There is no way
23:09
she is letting that go at all.
23:11
Coming up, will this hinder or help
23:13
Marie Le Penne's party in France? And
23:23
where do you think this is going
23:25
to leave the far right in France?
23:27
I think the debate now for the
23:30
next two years is going to be
23:32
a very fraught row over supposed politicisation
23:34
of the justice system, a lot of
23:36
anger, and I think one of Emmanuel
23:38
Macron's potential worries, because it's always the
23:40
way in France. is social unrest, people
23:42
on the streets and so on, how
23:44
unhappy voters might be about this. We
23:47
don't know how it would go. The
23:49
rezamblem and Ashenel are talking about having
23:51
peaceful... demonstrations. They're not a party in
23:53
the last few decades that have gone
23:55
out onto the street. Obviously they were
23:57
in the 70s and was part of
23:59
their problem. But they don't tend to
24:01
do that. She's very much been running
24:04
the parties, keep your head down, wear
24:06
a tie in a suit, and don't
24:08
put your head above the parapet. And
24:10
so it would be interesting to see
24:12
how things develop, but certainly a lot
24:14
of people aren't happy. And when you
24:16
say a lot of people, are you
24:18
talking about ordinary voters? It's going to
24:21
play out. At the beginning, Jordan Bardella
24:23
says, with a kind of leafleting campaign
24:25
and people going door to door to
24:27
explain this grave injustice, it's been done
24:29
to Marie Lapen. Obviously on the left,
24:31
the socialists say, you know, you have
24:33
to respect the judges and what they
24:35
say, but we've already had the government
24:38
says death threats against judges. So whether
24:40
we have the standoff between different parts
24:42
of society, I think is quite worrying
24:44
for Emmanuel Macron. And I appreciate that
24:46
we're only talking 24 hours after the
24:48
judges handed down. this sentence to Le
24:50
Pen, but do you have a sense
24:53
just how divided Francis on the question
24:55
of Le Pen at the moment? Well,
24:57
yeah, there have been a few snap
24:59
polls which found that a small majority
25:01
of French people felt that the justice
25:03
has just been done, that the judges
25:05
were just doing their job. A majority
25:07
of French people think French politicians are
25:10
corrupt. Of course, Le Pen was convicted
25:12
of embezzlement, not necessarily corruption. She wasn't
25:14
lining her own pockets. She was just
25:16
funding her party. But it's going to
25:18
start opening up this idea of conspiracy
25:20
of conspiracy theory of conspiracy theory of
25:22
conspiracy theory. which is already very present,
25:24
I think, in all the European, all
25:27
Western countries probably at the moment, and
25:29
it's not quite clear where that's going
25:31
to lead. And just in terms of
25:33
French politics and the fact that she
25:35
will remain in Parliament for the foreseeable,
25:37
can she cause mischief from the opposition
25:39
benches? I think this is really interesting.
25:41
She can cause mischief. They, of course,
25:44
can vote to bring the government down.
25:46
They have done that before, but they
25:48
need to team up with a left.
25:50
So she can't just bring the government
25:52
down. How's that going to work for
25:54
her? Because she would lose her parliament
25:56
seat. She would lose this massive standing
25:58
she has in parliament and this voice.
26:01
So I'm not quite sure it's in
26:03
their interest, but they like to sort
26:05
of wave that flag at the moment
26:07
to say, listen guys, watch out, we've
26:09
got our eye on you, we've got
26:11
more power than you, because of course,
26:13
you know, they feel that they were
26:15
robbed really of the last snap election,
26:18
which no one was a clear winner
26:20
of, the left alliance did actually take
26:22
the most votes and alliance of left
26:24
parties, but didn't take the Prime Minister's
26:26
position. So there's a lot of mistrust
26:28
on the political system in France at
26:30
the moment. which this could feed into.
26:33
And you've been our Paris correspondent for
26:35
well over a decade now, a keen
26:37
watcher of French politics. How pivotal do
26:39
you see this moment is for the
26:41
future of France? I think this is
26:43
an absolutely historic moment for France. I
26:45
think it could definitely define the next
26:47
presidential election as the left say. Le
26:50
Penne's party is not barred for running
26:52
for the presidency. They're still polling well,
26:54
even if another person would replace her.
26:56
And could this actually serve to propel
26:58
them into power? It sounds like it's
27:00
going to be a very interesting few
27:02
weeks and months in France. Anjalique, thank
27:04
you very much. Thanks, Helen. And
27:10
that was Augely Chrysophis. You can read all
27:12
of her coverage of this case at the
27:14
guardian.com. And if you appreciated this episode, and
27:16
of course, we hope that you did, perhaps
27:19
you'd consider leaving us a review, we always
27:21
really enjoy hearing what you think about the
27:23
show, and it also helps other people to
27:25
find us. And that's all for now. Today's
27:27
show was produced by George McDonough and Alex
27:30
Atak and presented by me, Helen. Sound design
27:32
was by Joel Joel Cox, and the executive
27:34
producer was Hummer Calee Calee Culeleelili. We'll be
27:36
back tomorrow. This
27:42
is the Guardian.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More