Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Released Wednesday, 2nd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Could Marine Le Pen’s guilty verdict help fuel the far right?

Wednesday, 2nd April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This

0:05

is

0:08

The

0:12

Guardian.

0:37

Your personal data is a goldmine for

0:39

hackers, and aura helps lock it down.

0:42

aura monitors the dark web, blocks data

0:44

brokers from selling your information, includes

0:46

a VPN for private browsing, and

0:48

a password manager to secure your

0:51

accounts before criminals break in. blocks data brokers from selling your information, includes a VPN for private browsing, and a password manager to secure your accounts

0:53

before criminals break in. For a

0:55

limited time, ORA is offering our

0:58

listeners a 14-day free trial plus

1:00

a dark web scan to check

1:02

if your personal information has been

1:05

leaked, all for free at ora.com/safety.

1:07

To sign up and start protecting

1:10

yourself and your loved ones. That's

1:12

a-u-r-a.com/safety. Check the site for

1:14

details. Walking

1:23

into the criminal courts in Paris

1:25

on Monday, Maureen Le Penne insisted

1:27

she was relaxed about what lay

1:29

ahead. She spent the weekend gardening

1:31

in her garden outside Paris saying

1:33

she felt completely cool and calm

1:35

and collected about this. She took

1:37

her seat on the front row

1:40

and quickly her mood changed. She

1:42

started to become more agitated when

1:44

she could see it was clear

1:46

that the judge was going to

1:48

find her guilty of this massive

1:50

system of embezzlement. The court

1:52

found the pen guilty of embezzling

1:54

millions in European Parliament funds as

1:56

part of a fake job scam

1:58

along with 24 others from her

2:01

National rally party. As the party's

2:03

leader, Le Pen received the harshest

2:05

punishment of the lot, a suspended

2:07

prison sentence, and a five-year ban

2:09

from public office, dashing her hopes

2:11

of a presidential run in 2027.

2:13

As the judge continued with a

2:16

verdict and it became clear that

2:18

she was going to be found

2:20

guilty, she turned to one of

2:22

her neighbours and whispered, Anquyap, incredible.

2:25

She stormed out of court and

2:27

went straight on the offensive. So

2:29

she immediately went on TV, she

2:31

was defiant, she was on the

2:33

attack. She said that she felt

2:35

it was a political decision and

2:38

that she would not submit to

2:40

such a denial of democracy. And

2:42

she said, and she reminded TV

2:44

viewers that millions of people vote

2:46

for her, she said, I didn't

2:48

think the judges would go as

2:50

far as to oppose our democratic

2:53

process and interfere with the choice

2:55

of the French people. Her treatment

2:57

was bad for running for five

2:59

years, and she's the leading candidate

3:01

at the fair, and I'm afraid

3:03

just scobu. Her treatment drew criticism

3:05

from allies around the globe, with

3:08

some leaders seeing themselves in her

3:10

plight. That's a very big deal.

3:12

I know all about it, and

3:14

a lot of people thought she

3:16

wasn't going to be convicted of

3:18

anything, and I don't know if

3:20

it means conviction. But she was

3:23

banned for running for five years,

3:25

and she's the leading candidate. She's

3:27

the leading candidate. Once

3:31

upon a time, really not that

3:33

long ago, being a convicted criminal

3:35

would put an end to any

3:38

political career. But in a world

3:40

where you can become president of

3:42

the USA, despite multiple felonies, maybe

3:44

even because of those felonies, could

3:46

Le Penne's conviction actually help her

3:49

far-right party rise to the very

3:51

top of French politics? From the

3:53

Guardian, I'm Helimpid. Today in focus.

3:55

Will Marine Le Penne's convictions make

3:58

her a martyr. Yeah.

4:02

Angelique Chrysophis, you are the Guardian's

4:04

Paris correspondent, it's been a big

4:06

week for French politics and you've

4:08

been in court following Marie Le

4:11

Pen's case over the past couple

4:13

of months and you've spoken about

4:15

her to us before, she is

4:17

the leader of course of the

4:19

National rally party which used to

4:21

be called the National Front when

4:23

it was run by her father

4:25

Jean-Marie Le Pen and she spent

4:27

years trying to detoxify the farright

4:29

party. next president of France and

4:31

then we come to this below

4:33

this week. Can you just start

4:35

by telling us what exactly have

4:37

Le Pen and her party members

4:39

been found guilty of? Marie Le

4:41

Pen and 24 other party officials

4:43

have been found guilty of a

4:45

massive embezzlement scheme on an unprecedented

4:47

scale and this is the embezzlement

4:49

of European Parliament. taxpayer money to

4:51

pay for parliamentary assistance, but in

4:53

fact those parliamentary assistance were not

4:55

doing their work for the European

4:57

Parliament. They were in fact working

4:59

for the party. So it was

5:01

a way to siphon off European

5:03

taxpayer money into the party coffers

5:05

in Paris. This was a scam

5:07

that was said to have gone

5:09

on for a long time between

5:11

2004 and 2016, and the evidence

5:13

was pretty damning, and much of

5:15

the political class were prepared for

5:17

her to be found guilty, but

5:19

what they weren't prepared for was

5:21

the scale of the sentence. Yeah,

5:23

I can imagine. Can you just

5:25

give us the fine details of

5:27

the sentence? The most dramatic part

5:29

of her sentence was a five-year

5:31

ban on running for public office,

5:34

which almost certainly, because it has

5:36

been delivered with immediate effect, means

5:38

that she can't run for the

5:40

presidency in 2027. She was also

5:42

given four years in prison, but

5:44

she won't go to prison while

5:46

she has appealed at this stage,

5:48

but half of those four years

5:50

are suspended, and the other two

5:52

would be wearing an electronic bracelet.

5:54

and she was also fined 100,000

5:56

euros. And you said that you

5:58

had listened to the evidence against

6:00

her and other party members and

6:02

that it did sound quite damning.

6:04

Were you surprised though just how

6:06

harsh the sentence is for her

6:08

in particular? Well, the sentence has

6:10

to be looked at in context.

6:12

There's been a lot of talk

6:14

in the last decade in France

6:16

of embezzlement fraud, corruption and so

6:18

on among politicians. Marie Le Pen

6:20

was of course the great anti-corruption

6:22

crusader herself calling for there to

6:24

be harsher laws against politicians who

6:26

do anything to do with financial

6:28

impropriety and saying that they should

6:30

be banned from public office for

6:32

life. But about nine years ago,

6:34

the rules were tightened because politicians

6:36

thought, well, judges aren't giving out

6:38

harsh enough. sentences. They're not banning

6:40

people from running for public office.

6:42

So legal observers, a lot of

6:44

lawyers and judges themselves say this

6:46

sentence, ban on running for public

6:48

office and with immediate effect, is

6:50

actually just them observing this tightened

6:52

law. What Le Pen and her

6:54

supporters have a problem with is

6:57

this idea of immediate effect. because

6:59

although she can appeal the verdict

7:01

and the other aspects of it,

7:03

the prison sentence, there's nothing she

7:05

can do about this ban with

7:07

immediate effect, so she feels it's

7:09

undemocratic, the judges say this is

7:11

totally justified, no one can have

7:13

immunity in violation of the law.

7:15

Yeah, and so have the judges

7:17

then effectively just ended Le Penne's

7:19

political career? Not her political career,

7:21

don't forget she's still a member

7:23

of parliament for Nor Padakaléle and

7:25

she can keep that... However, she's

7:27

almost certainly barred from running in

7:29

the 2027 presidential election, which she

7:31

and others say she was a

7:33

favourite for. However, there's a very

7:35

slim chance she could run, and

7:37

it depends on the timing of

7:39

any appeal. An appeal in France

7:41

usually takes 18 months to two

7:43

years. She wants to appeal right

7:45

now. Could that appeal be heard

7:47

before the spring 2027 presidential election?

7:49

Could she be found innocent and

7:51

could this immediate effect ban be

7:53

overturned? All of those factors would

7:55

have to happen for her to

7:57

suddenly sneak in with a last

7:59

minute candidacy for the presidency. So

8:01

she said that she's going to

8:03

appeal, come what May? Yeah, she

8:05

said she's coming out fighting. She

8:07

and the party won't hear of

8:09

any kind of plan B. They're

8:11

currently saying no, I'm going to

8:13

fight this till the end and

8:15

essentially she will be the candidate

8:18

with this hope that an appeal

8:20

could be heard in time. But

8:22

then of course she would have

8:24

to be found innocent of the

8:26

charges she's just been found guilty

8:28

of. Everything would have to be

8:30

overturned on appeal. Let's see what

8:32

happens. And you've heard the evidence,

8:34

do you think that that's likely?

8:36

Well the evidence in court was

8:38

particularly stark. What the judges were

8:40

looking at were were these people

8:42

who had these contracts to be

8:44

parliamentary assistants. Were they actually working

8:46

in the European Parliament? Some of

8:48

them were people that us journalists

8:50

knew, like, a very well-known bodyguard

8:52

from Marine Le Pen and Jean-Marie

8:54

Le Pen, and none of us

8:56

were ever aware that he was

8:58

a European parliamentary assistant. Obviously their

9:00

offices were raided and many email

9:02

communications were taken and some of

9:04

them were quite damning and there

9:06

was one supposed parliamentary assistant who

9:08

were supposed to have been working

9:10

for a member of the European

9:12

Parliament for four months when he

9:14

emailed Marie Lapen herself and said

9:16

I'd really like to see the

9:18

European Parliament and then I could

9:20

meet the member of the European

9:22

Parliament I'm attached to. and he

9:24

was supposed to have been working

9:26

there already. There was somebody else

9:28

who was supposed to have been

9:30

based in Brussels, who really never

9:32

went there. There was somebody else

9:34

who was supposed to be a

9:36

parliamentary assistant and had spoken once

9:38

on the phone to the Member

9:41

of Parliament in question in almost

9:43

a year. So it sounds like

9:45

the evidence against Marie Lappen was

9:47

not simply that she was the

9:49

most senior member of the party

9:51

presided over this corruption, but that

9:53

she was aware of it, given

9:55

that she had received at least

9:57

that email that you just mentioned.

9:59

Yes, the judges found that she

10:01

was at the heart of a

10:03

system of embezzlement and the prosecutor

10:05

said that her party had essentially

10:07

treated the European Parliament like a

10:09

cash cow that had a kind

10:11

of war machine to siphon off

10:13

money from it and certainly there

10:15

were details of meetings and so

10:17

on which showed the judges argued

10:19

that Marie Lapen was at the

10:21

centre of this. And she obviously

10:23

maintains her innocence but she's gone

10:25

further hasn't she in her criticism

10:27

of the judges? Yes, she has.

10:29

I mean, she says that this

10:31

is politically motivated and they were

10:33

deliberately trying to stop her running

10:35

from election and deliberately trying to

10:37

sabotage her career. And her party

10:39

president, Jordan Bardellas, called the judges

10:41

red judges, saying that this wasn't

10:43

a proper legal process and was

10:45

simply a political decision. Neither of

10:47

them talked much about the charges.

10:49

It has to be said. Red

10:51

judges. So Badeo is essentially suggesting

10:53

that the judiciary are a bunch

10:55

of communists that out to get

10:57

La Penn. Right. She has obviously

10:59

said that the sentence is an

11:01

affronts to democracy. Do you think

11:04

there is any truth in these

11:06

kind of assertions that the courts

11:08

that the judges have overstepped the

11:10

mark? Well, the panel of three

11:12

judges listened to this case for

11:14

nine weeks. They then backed up

11:16

their verdicts with 150 pages of

11:18

documentation and said that they simply...

11:20

were following laws voted in by

11:22

the French Parliament on the sentencing

11:24

of politicians who have found guilty

11:26

of embezzlement. And for those of

11:28

us who don't really know the

11:30

French judicial system, is it like

11:32

in America where judges can be

11:34

political appointees or are they completely

11:36

independent from the political system? They're

11:38

not voted in in any way.

11:40

It's a completely independent judicial system.

11:50

Let's talk a bit about the

11:52

reaction to this really dramatic day

11:54

in court. First of all domestically,

11:56

how have her domestic opponents responded?

11:58

celebrating her downfall? Not all her

12:01

opponents. Some of her opponents, for

12:03

example, her long-running opponent on the

12:05

left-wing Jean-Louis Jean-Jean has said, you

12:07

know, this should be decided by

12:09

the people, we shouldn't have this

12:11

kind of decision in court. Other

12:14

people have been harsher. Matthew Lefebb,

12:16

who's an MP for macron centrist,

12:18

said, you know, she's not a

12:20

victim of a political or judiciary

12:22

conspiracy, she's a victim of herself,

12:24

but the traditional right, Lere publicacosa

12:27

Sarko's old party, have been, have

12:29

been... pretty stern about it. Leauvogier, who

12:31

wants to run for head of that party,

12:33

is talking about it being not healthy

12:35

for democracy. Francois Xavier Bellamy, who's a European

12:37

Parliament member, said it was a dark

12:39

day for democracy, which of course echoes the

12:42

way Lippen is talking about it. That

12:44

does surprise me in some ways, because you

12:46

would have thought that they would be

12:48

delighted to see Lippen suffer in this way,

12:50

and also you wouldn't think that you'd

12:52

have sentress attacking the judiciary, would you? Times

12:55

have changed. And if we look beyond

12:57

France, what has the global reaction been? I

12:59

think the reaction beyond France is really

13:01

important politically for the French presidential

13:04

race, because in France, the French

13:06

presidential race, it's very important not

13:08

to be seen to be enthrall

13:10

to any kind of international... powers

13:12

in any international way and what's

13:15

happened is there's been an absolute

13:17

pylon of the kind of global

13:19

populist right in support of Marie

13:21

Lapen which in a way serves

13:23

Emmanuel Macron's charges against her that

13:26

she's part of this kind of

13:28

international reactionary group. So we've had

13:30

the obvious ones in Europe Hungary's

13:32

Victor Orban backing her. Vilders in

13:34

the Netherlands. Orban said, I am

13:36

marine, right? He was the first

13:38

person to come straight in with

13:40

that massive sign of support and

13:42

it goes further afield from Europe.

13:44

Bolsonaro said it was left-wing judicial

13:47

activism. But I think there's two

13:49

points here. The first is one

13:51

of the first people to comment

13:53

was the Kremlin who said, you know,

13:55

more and more European capitals

13:57

were trampling over democratic norms.

13:59

which carries a certain aspect of irony

14:02

in it, but is also not necessarily

14:04

serving Marilla Penn's party that well as

14:06

she's trying to distance herself from the

14:08

cosing up to Vladimir Putin of the

14:10

past. But I think the crucial thing

14:13

has come from the US. If you

14:15

look at the context of this, we've

14:17

had JD Vance's speech in Munich, where

14:19

he's talking about the EU kind of

14:21

rotting from within with an elite that's

14:24

using the judiciary against decent parties, like

14:26

we imagine the AFT in Germany and

14:28

the pens party, it's kind of democracy

14:30

by judges. And so when the verdict

14:33

dropped, Trump himself and Trump's entourage really

14:35

went to town with it. And we

14:37

had a message from Don Junior, Donald

14:39

Trump's son, on social media saying, are

14:41

they trying to show that JD Vance

14:44

was completely right about everything? And then

14:46

we had Elon Musk piling in. Of

14:48

course. Of course. And he said, you

14:50

know, when the radical left, I'm not

14:52

sure who he means by that, French

14:55

judges, I don't know, but when the

14:57

radical left can't win via... Democratic vote.

14:59

They abused the legal system to jail

15:01

their opponents and he said this will

15:03

backfire like the legal attacks on Donald

15:06

Trump. Trump took a while to reply

15:08

actually, but he then did eventually say,

15:10

you know, this sounds very much like

15:12

this country, drawing an absolute parallel with

15:14

his own legal problems, which of course

15:17

didn't stop him being elected or supported.

15:19

And he said, you know, this is

15:21

a very big deal. A lot of

15:23

people thought she wouldn't be convicted of

15:25

anything, which I don't think is actually

15:28

the case in France. I think even

15:30

her own party knew that they were

15:32

looking at convictions. But he said, you

15:34

know, this sounds very much like this

15:37

country like this country, this country, America,

15:39

America, America, America. message from Marie Le

15:41

Pen is that she has to be

15:43

quite cautious and she has been cautious

15:45

about Donald Trump. France is very much

15:48

its own country. It's facing massive tariffs,

15:50

wars with the US. You mustn't look

15:52

like you're selling out your own country's

15:54

interests for the US. And so I'm

15:56

not sure that Trump's comments necessarily serving

15:59

her, but certainly the global outrage she

16:01

has been very pleased to have that

16:03

reflect. back. And if you think about

16:05

Trump becoming the US president for the

16:07

second time in spite of so many

16:10

judgments against him, felonies that he was

16:12

found guilty of, and he still was

16:14

elected to the White House and seems

16:16

more powerful than ever, is there a

16:18

world in which all of this helps?

16:21

Lipen politically and that she can sort

16:23

of paint herself as some sort of

16:25

a scapegoat, you know, that the establishment

16:27

is so frightened of her that they

16:29

are just looking for any excuse to

16:32

bring her down. Well it feeds into

16:34

a victimisation narrative. It feeds into her

16:36

narrative that the system is against her,

16:38

that she and her party are outsiders,

16:40

and that everyone is ganging up against

16:43

her. So yes, and also you have

16:45

to remember that this hasn't damaged her

16:47

yet. So this investigation has been running

16:49

for 10 years, and during those 10

16:52

years, the party has gone from strength

16:54

to strength with her leading it. So

16:56

she's run for president in total three

16:58

times, and twice she's got into the

17:00

final round runoff. And in a last

17:03

runoff, she had a historic score with

17:05

13 million votes. This investigation has never

17:07

put voters off before and her party

17:09

argues very clearly right now that it's

17:11

actually going to bring support to them.

17:14

It may bolster her hardcore group of

17:16

voters but whether it will help her

17:18

reach out to other voters who she

17:20

needs or she or anyone in her

17:22

party needs to win the presidency is

17:25

another issue but certainly it could well

17:27

galvanize support. And

17:34

when I asked you earlier about how

17:36

her domestic opponents have responded, you know

17:38

that quite cautious note that Jean-Luc Melanchion,

17:41

if I've pronounced that correct, on the

17:43

left, you might have thought that he

17:45

would be celebrating her downfall, but him

17:47

saying actually didn't think that it's right

17:50

that these things are decided by the

17:52

courts and that really the voters should

17:54

have a chance to decide. He can

17:57

clearly see that there's a danger that

17:59

Le Penne will use this to her

18:01

advantage, do you think? Yeah, I think

18:04

that's very true. I think that's true

18:06

where we see in relative silence of

18:08

Emmanuel Macron's camp, because of course they

18:10

can't really be seen to making comments

18:13

on the digital system. But one thing

18:15

I would just say, which is perhaps

18:17

a quirk of French politics, is that

18:20

as Marina Pena herself has argued for

18:22

a decade. We're not the only ones

18:24

who did this. And so you can

18:26

sometimes read the reaction through what people

18:29

are facing themselves. So Francois Béru, who's

18:31

the centrist Prime Minister at the moment,

18:33

his party has already faced a trial

18:36

over similar issues on a much smaller

18:38

scale financially, it has to be said,

18:40

because Marine La Pen, we're talking about

18:43

losses to the European Parliament of about

18:45

4.5 million euros. But Bayou was cleared,

18:47

some of his party members were convicted,

18:49

and the state prosecutor has appealed that.

18:52

So he at some point will be

18:54

facing an appeal trial over similar charges,

18:56

and Jolic Meline Jean himself absolutely denies

18:59

any wrongdoing, but has also faced questions

19:01

over parliamentary assistance. Again, he denies any

19:03

wrongdoing, he's not facing a trial, but

19:05

there is a context to some of

19:08

these comments. Yeah, and I guess Lipen

19:10

is far from the only big dog

19:12

in French politics to have found themselves

19:15

on the wrong side of the law.

19:17

Didn't Sarkozy get done for something or

19:19

other? Oh, well, Sarkozy has faced myriad

19:22

court cases, and in fact, he's been

19:24

in the same courtroom that Marie Lipen

19:26

has been in, swapping hearings versus afternoon

19:28

hearings for a trial over presidential campaign

19:31

funding where he's alleged to have taken

19:33

money from Gaddafi in Libya. and the

19:35

state prosecutors asked for him to be

19:38

jailed for seven years. We won't have

19:40

a verdict on that for many months

19:42

to come. It sounds like French politics

19:44

is all a bit mucky doesn't it?

19:47

But back to Le Pen and her

19:49

party. As you said she can carry

19:51

on as an MP for as long

19:54

as this current parliament kind of limps

19:56

on but ultimately if she does have

19:58

to go who will replace her do

20:01

you think at the top of the

20:03

party? I think it's a very good

20:05

question. I don't think we necessarily know

20:07

the answer for sure. The obvious person...

20:10

who she's been training up to be

20:12

her right-hand man for years is Jordan

20:14

Baldella. He's 29. He's extremely young to

20:17

run for president. He's never worked in

20:19

any kind of job outside politics. He

20:21

joined the party's youth group. He's been

20:23

elected to the European Parliament twice and

20:26

he is seen as quite inexperienced. But

20:28

she argues that he could be a

20:30

good candidate. He certainly has the same

20:33

high poll ratings that she has. He's

20:35

very popular, particularly amongst younger people. He's

20:37

just done an autobiography, even though the

20:40

argument was he didn't have much to

20:42

say in it. And it sold 200,000

20:44

copies, and he's constantly signing books all

20:46

across France. It's massive on Tiktok. But

20:49

is that enough for a presidential race.

20:51

We're not sure. He says, look, I'm

20:53

not talking about this now. I backed

20:56

Marie La Penn's niece. She's left the

20:58

party. She's been... in dispute with Maureen

21:00

Le Pen before, she's coming back more

21:02

into the folds. If you think about

21:05

it, I'm not saying she could run,

21:07

but she's one to watch. This party

21:09

is 50 years old, so the national

21:12

rally, formerly the Faun-Nacional, and they've always

21:14

run a La Pen in a presidential

21:16

campaign, whether it's Jean-Marie La Pen, or

21:19

Maureen La Pen. This would be the

21:21

first time they ran without a La

21:23

Pen, if they do. higher wealth photos.

21:25

Because I guess that while he doesn't

21:28

have that instant Le Pen name recognition,

21:30

he also doesn't have all of that

21:32

unwanted baggage that comes along with it.

21:35

Because let's not forget, Marine Le Pen's

21:37

father was an unabashed racist and an

21:39

anti-Semite who called the Holocaust a detail

21:41

of history. Right, he's trying to row

21:44

back on that. Of course that is

21:46

Marine Le Pen's work to change the

21:48

image. of the party, if not the

21:51

content of the anti-immigration policies, has remained

21:53

the same, but this sort of jack-booted

21:55

anti-Semitic image, she's tried to change and

21:58

Jolan Bandela has been key to that.

22:00

He's of course just come back from

22:02

a historic trip to Israel to try

22:04

and caught the Jewish community back home.

22:07

Right. And so it sounds like she's

22:09

got protégé's kind of waiting in the

22:11

wings, but she has been such a

22:14

dominant figure in her own party. Do

22:16

you think that the party can survive

22:18

without her? I don't think there's any

22:20

question of her disappearing in any way,

22:23

because she could still come back after

22:25

the five years if this decision is

22:27

upheld. I don't think she's in any

22:30

way thinking of leaving politics at all.

22:32

Even if Jordan Madela was to win,

22:34

there could be some kind of interesting

22:37

combo where she endeavours to be appointed

22:39

his Prime Minister or a Minister in

22:41

government. You don't have to be elected

22:43

to have that role. Really, even if

22:46

you've got a criminal record, you can

22:48

still become the Prime Minister of France.

22:50

Well, this is the whole debate that's

22:53

currently ongoing about that. Some say yes,

22:55

some say no. I think there's no

22:57

question of her quitting politics. She runs

22:59

that part of this party has always

23:02

been run by one family, one person,

23:04

one Le Pen in a very, very,

23:06

very tight ship. There is no way

23:09

she is letting that go at all.

23:11

Coming up, will this hinder or help

23:13

Marie Le Penne's party in France? And

23:23

where do you think this is going

23:25

to leave the far right in France?

23:27

I think the debate now for the

23:30

next two years is going to be

23:32

a very fraught row over supposed politicisation

23:34

of the justice system, a lot of

23:36

anger, and I think one of Emmanuel

23:38

Macron's potential worries, because it's always the

23:40

way in France. is social unrest, people

23:42

on the streets and so on, how

23:44

unhappy voters might be about this. We

23:47

don't know how it would go. The

23:49

rezamblem and Ashenel are talking about having

23:51

peaceful... demonstrations. They're not a party in

23:53

the last few decades that have gone

23:55

out onto the street. Obviously they were

23:57

in the 70s and was part of

23:59

their problem. But they don't tend to

24:01

do that. She's very much been running

24:04

the parties, keep your head down, wear

24:06

a tie in a suit, and don't

24:08

put your head above the parapet. And

24:10

so it would be interesting to see

24:12

how things develop, but certainly a lot

24:14

of people aren't happy. And when you

24:16

say a lot of people, are you

24:18

talking about ordinary voters? It's going to

24:21

play out. At the beginning, Jordan Bardella

24:23

says, with a kind of leafleting campaign

24:25

and people going door to door to

24:27

explain this grave injustice, it's been done

24:29

to Marie Lapen. Obviously on the left,

24:31

the socialists say, you know, you have

24:33

to respect the judges and what they

24:35

say, but we've already had the government

24:38

says death threats against judges. So whether

24:40

we have the standoff between different parts

24:42

of society, I think is quite worrying

24:44

for Emmanuel Macron. And I appreciate that

24:46

we're only talking 24 hours after the

24:48

judges handed down. this sentence to Le

24:50

Pen, but do you have a sense

24:53

just how divided Francis on the question

24:55

of Le Pen at the moment? Well,

24:57

yeah, there have been a few snap

24:59

polls which found that a small majority

25:01

of French people felt that the justice

25:03

has just been done, that the judges

25:05

were just doing their job. A majority

25:07

of French people think French politicians are

25:10

corrupt. Of course, Le Pen was convicted

25:12

of embezzlement, not necessarily corruption. She wasn't

25:14

lining her own pockets. She was just

25:16

funding her party. But it's going to

25:18

start opening up this idea of conspiracy

25:20

of conspiracy theory of conspiracy theory of

25:22

conspiracy theory. which is already very present,

25:24

I think, in all the European, all

25:27

Western countries probably at the moment, and

25:29

it's not quite clear where that's going

25:31

to lead. And just in terms of

25:33

French politics and the fact that she

25:35

will remain in Parliament for the foreseeable,

25:37

can she cause mischief from the opposition

25:39

benches? I think this is really interesting.

25:41

She can cause mischief. They, of course,

25:44

can vote to bring the government down.

25:46

They have done that before, but they

25:48

need to team up with a left.

25:50

So she can't just bring the government

25:52

down. How's that going to work for

25:54

her? Because she would lose her parliament

25:56

seat. She would lose this massive standing

25:58

she has in parliament and this voice.

26:01

So I'm not quite sure it's in

26:03

their interest, but they like to sort

26:05

of wave that flag at the moment

26:07

to say, listen guys, watch out, we've

26:09

got our eye on you, we've got

26:11

more power than you, because of course,

26:13

you know, they feel that they were

26:15

robbed really of the last snap election,

26:18

which no one was a clear winner

26:20

of, the left alliance did actually take

26:22

the most votes and alliance of left

26:24

parties, but didn't take the Prime Minister's

26:26

position. So there's a lot of mistrust

26:28

on the political system in France at

26:30

the moment. which this could feed into.

26:33

And you've been our Paris correspondent for

26:35

well over a decade now, a keen

26:37

watcher of French politics. How pivotal do

26:39

you see this moment is for the

26:41

future of France? I think this is

26:43

an absolutely historic moment for France. I

26:45

think it could definitely define the next

26:47

presidential election as the left say. Le

26:50

Penne's party is not barred for running

26:52

for the presidency. They're still polling well,

26:54

even if another person would replace her.

26:56

And could this actually serve to propel

26:58

them into power? It sounds like it's

27:00

going to be a very interesting few

27:02

weeks and months in France. Anjalique, thank

27:04

you very much. Thanks, Helen. And

27:10

that was Augely Chrysophis. You can read all

27:12

of her coverage of this case at the

27:14

guardian.com. And if you appreciated this episode, and

27:16

of course, we hope that you did, perhaps

27:19

you'd consider leaving us a review, we always

27:21

really enjoy hearing what you think about the

27:23

show, and it also helps other people to

27:25

find us. And that's all for now. Today's

27:27

show was produced by George McDonough and Alex

27:30

Atak and presented by me, Helen. Sound design

27:32

was by Joel Joel Cox, and the executive

27:34

producer was Hummer Calee Calee Culeleelili. We'll be

27:36

back tomorrow. This

27:42

is the Guardian.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features