Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Released Monday, 18th November 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Bonus: Malcolm Guite on T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets (Part 2)

Monday, 18th November 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You're listening to a podcast by

0:02

the Center for Action and Contemplation.

0:04

To learn more, visit cac.org. Greetings.

0:08

I'm Jim Finley. And

0:11

I'm Kirsten Oates. Welcome

0:14

to Turning to the Mystics. Welcome

0:24

everyone to Season 10 of Turning to

0:26

the Mystics, where we've been

0:28

turning to T.S. Eliot and

0:30

his poetry in four quartets. This

0:34

episode is part two of our conversation

0:36

with Malcolm Guyt. And

0:38

in today's episode, Jim, Malcolm and

0:40

myself reflect on the third

0:42

and fourth poems in four quartets.

0:45

The fourth poem, Little Gidding, is the

0:48

grand finale to all three poems, where

0:50

we find our way to a little chapel

0:53

to kneel where prayer has been valid, and

0:56

where we see the mystical nature of all

0:58

the poems. So with

1:00

that, I'm going to hand over

1:02

to you, Jim, and you're going to just

1:04

take us through a small section of the

1:07

third poem, Dry Salvages, before we move on

1:09

to Little Gidding. And so

1:11

we're going to part five of

1:13

Dry Salvages about halfway through. So

1:17

I'll read it. Men's

1:20

curiosity searches past and future

1:23

and clings to that dimension. But

1:26

to apprehend the point of intersection

1:28

of the timeless with time is

1:31

the occupation of the saint. No

1:34

occupation either, but something

1:36

given and taken in

1:38

a lifetime's death in love. For

1:41

most of us, there is only the

1:44

unattended moment, the moment in and out

1:46

of time, the distraction fit, lost in

1:48

a shaft of sunlight. I'd

1:50

like to reflect on this for a minute with

1:52

you. It's

1:55

really true. We ruminate over the past and

1:57

we worry about the future. these

2:00

moments of the intersection of

2:03

time and eternity under the great

2:05

barber and the drafty church, the

2:07

quiet hour it days in, were

2:09

momentarily in this eternity and were

2:12

at the intersection. But it's

2:14

saying the saint is not content

2:16

to simply know these fleeting moments

2:18

where time and eternity are intermingled

2:20

in an alchemy that they're one.

2:23

But rather the saint seeks to live there.

2:26

See how can I abide in

2:28

the experience of the intersection that

2:31

alone is ultimately real? And

2:33

it's not just an intersection, but

2:35

also it's a death. Let me find the text

2:38

here. In a

2:40

lifetime's death and love, I love

2:42

that phrase, it's a lifetime of

2:45

endlessly dying to everything

2:47

that's endlessly passing away so that that

2:49

which never passes away can shine out

2:51

through everything passing away, you know,

2:54

as holiness. So what do you see in that,

2:56

Malcolm? I love that passage. I

2:59

think he's been setting up for

3:01

us from the very first poem

3:04

this problem or this question, if you

3:06

like, the intersection of time

3:08

and the timeless about the timeless moment,

3:10

about how through time, time is conquered,

3:12

about whether we can redeem the time.

3:15

This is the constant theme. And

3:17

he returns to it here and I think he places

3:19

it right at the

3:22

heart of Christian vocation. So

3:24

to apprehend, and I think he's very clear,

3:27

I think he Shakespearean in his use

3:29

of the word apprehend there, that imagination

3:32

apprehends more than cool reason ever comprehends.

3:35

We must apprehend some joy before we

3:37

comprehend the bringer of that joy. But

3:40

to apprehend the point of

3:42

intersection of the timeless with

3:44

time is an

3:46

occupation for the saint. And that means all of

3:48

us. There's

3:50

no occupation either, but

3:52

something given and taken that's

3:54

brilliant. You know, he's no sooner said it than he's to think,

3:56

I don't want to turn this into a work. It's

3:59

a moment of relief. It's a moment of openness

4:01

to what's given. And he

4:04

goes on, something given and taken in a lifetime's

4:06

death in love. Yes, that's one of the great

4:08

phrases. Arder and selflessness

4:10

and self surrender. And

4:12

then he brings the rest of us

4:14

in that aren't, you know, John of

4:16

the cross or anybody else. And I

4:18

feel really grateful for his welcoming charity

4:20

and the fact that he includes himself

4:23

in the others, in the rest of us. So he

4:25

says, for most of us, there

4:27

is only the unattended moment, the

4:30

moment in and out of time, the distract. And

4:32

you know, we're right back with those three moments

4:35

that he was telling us about in the earlier poem. He's gathering it all up. He's

4:39

telling all of us we have these moments. And he's

4:41

saying, pay attention. Pay attention

4:43

when that happens. Lost

4:45

in a shaft of sunlight, the wild time unseen,

4:48

or the winter lightning, or the waterfall, or

4:51

music heard so deeply that it is not heard

4:53

at all, but you are the music while the

4:55

music lasts. I think he's saying

4:57

in these poems, I

4:59

may not any more than you be able to

5:02

express a lifetime self surrender in the way that

5:04

perhaps John of the cross does. But

5:07

I share with you the unattended

5:09

moments. And what I'm

5:11

trying to do to offer you in my

5:13

poem is the gift of attention, that

5:16

it is by the poetry that we attend

5:19

to the unattended moments. And

5:22

I think of the four quartets, not as

5:24

a kind of lofty thing, I wish

5:26

I could have mystical experiences like that. I

5:29

see it much more as a series of worked examples

5:32

with a kind of go and do thou likewise. You

5:35

apprehend these moments with him in

5:37

order to be able to better apprehend them. When

5:40

you suddenly see something lost in a shaft

5:42

of sunlight, you know, when you are in

5:44

whatever your equivalent is of

5:47

the arbor where the rain beat. And

5:49

I then, the humility of it, he follows you, you are the

5:51

music while the music lasts. One

5:54

of the greatest lines of phrases of English poetry. And

5:56

then he goes, oh, these are only hints

5:59

followed by guesses. and the

6:01

rest is prayer, observance, discipline, thought

6:03

and action. And then I think

6:06

one of the great moments of affirmation

6:09

in the poem, the hint half-guessed,

6:12

the gift half-understood, is

6:15

incarnation. Lewis

6:18

said that every poem is a little incarnation,

6:21

and I think that's what he's doing. He's kind

6:23

of bodying forth for us these

6:26

things. But he can only do it, and

6:28

we can only receive it, because ultimately the

6:30

word himself bodied

6:32

forth. It was incarnate, you know, that in

6:35

Christ there genuinely is a meeting of the

6:37

eternal and time. I

6:39

have one more thing I want to add on here before

6:41

we move into a little bit. On the same passage, I

6:44

get a sense of something being implied here, and

6:46

tell me how this strikes you, is that

6:49

it's really true we're aware

6:52

we're momentarily at the intersection. And

6:55

we spend most of our life in the unattended moments.

6:58

But there's an insight to this. Although

7:00

the attentiveness from our end breaks,

7:02

you know, just occasionally lights up

7:05

again, it never breaks from

7:07

God's end. So even

7:09

the unattended moments are eternally attended

7:12

by God in the

7:14

holiness of the incidental holiness of simple

7:16

things. And he's trying

7:18

to breathe that atmospheric divinity

7:20

of the rhythms of ordinariness.

7:23

So how does that strike you? Is that also, does

7:25

that strike you? I agree with

7:27

that. I think the theologians

7:29

can take nice Latin eight words

7:31

like omniscience and

7:34

bandy them around. But

7:36

a poet helps us to attend, well, if God

7:38

knows everything, let's consider some

7:40

of the everythings he knows, including

7:43

the unattended moment when you're washing the dishes,

7:45

you know, and the

7:47

moment a leaf falls somewhere in a forest.

7:49

He knows its pattern and its beauty. And

7:52

I think more. I think he looks at

7:54

it and sees that it is good. I

7:58

think the American poet Wendell Berry is good at this. in

8:00

his Secrets of Poems called

8:02

Sabbath. But one of the

8:04

things that a certain kind of inspired poetry can

8:06

do is to allow you

8:08

for a moment to watch things with God, with

8:12

God's concentration in time, rather than just

8:14

with your own fleeting distractions. When

8:17

the poem resonates with that experience, it

8:19

can open your mind to it. I

8:21

love what you both said and that

8:24

line, hear the impossible union. So what

8:26

I'm hearing is it's impossible from our

8:28

side to create, but it's always there

8:30

from God's side. I

8:32

mean, hear the impossible union. When he

8:34

says hear the impossible union,

8:37

you know, is actual, is a direct reply

8:39

to the despairing moment of

8:41

all time is unredeemable. Oh

8:44

yes, it is redeemable. This is where

8:46

it's redeemable in this union, which is

8:48

incarnation. Well,

9:00

on to the finale, Little Getting.

9:03

The grand finale, yeah. Little Getting. Jim,

9:05

do you want to

9:07

get us started?

9:10

Yes. I'll

9:13

start with my sense of this. He

9:16

kind of begins again with these strange kind

9:18

of fleetiness of time, spring and summer and

9:20

winter. He starts, he goes on like before.

9:24

And then he says, if

9:27

you came this way, and the way means this way

9:29

to Little Getting. And

9:33

then he says, taking the route you'd likely take on your way home

9:35

from work, whatever it is. Well,

9:37

I say taking the route you'd like to take from the

9:39

place you'd be likely to come from is a very oblique

9:41

way of talking about Cambridge because Little Getting's not that far

9:43

off. And

9:45

he visited Little Getting from Cambridge and

9:48

was taken there in, I think 1936,

9:50

you know, by a guy called Maycock.

9:53

And the truth is that most people do come to Little

9:55

Getting by one particular route. From

9:57

Cambridge. because

10:00

it tends to be people in Cambridge you've heard

10:02

of little Giddin, because it's a tiny, tiny little

10:04

place in the middle of

10:06

nowhere. It's on the smallest of

10:08

back roads. You would go by it and

10:11

not even know it was there unless you

10:13

were really looking for it. I

10:15

want to say something here in kind

10:18

of theological language in parentheses that

10:20

he's going to poetically give witness to. Is

10:23

that in his faith in Christ through

10:26

Jesus, which is when we kneel, we're

10:28

prayers are invalid. We don't

10:30

have to find our way out

10:32

of time. We don't

10:34

have to wait for these little timeless moments in

10:36

the midst of time. For in Jesus, the

10:39

infinite love of God, the word became flesh

10:41

and dwelt among us. And God

10:43

enters in to the very time of the

10:45

times of our life. So

10:47

for me to live is Christ.

10:50

So God, Jesus lives our life.

10:52

Jesus suffers our suffering. Jesus dies

10:54

our death. And the resurrection of

10:57

Jesus bears witness to our resurrection,

11:00

not just when we die into glory, because

11:02

witness to the resurrection that is born

11:04

out of these awakening moments, that

11:07

God's already unexplainably present in

11:09

the ordinariness of everything. And

11:11

when we come to this realization, no matter

11:14

how you come, you didn't expect to come

11:16

there. No matter how you come,

11:18

you might fall off the cliff, you're just dropped

11:20

into this serendipitous place. And what

11:22

do you make of this way of setting this up?

11:24

How does that strike you? What would you say? I

11:27

like that. I think this is very much

11:29

a poem about having

11:32

the humility to receive what God has to

11:34

give you in Christ. And there's

11:36

a bit where he says, he

11:38

has this list of reasons that you might have given

11:41

yourself on your English itinerary, like

11:43

he did in 1936, of

11:46

why you might wanna make a visit to this place. And

11:48

he ticks them all off and says, forget it. Just

11:50

jettison all of those things. So he says,

11:53

you are not here. If

11:55

you came this day, take any route, starting anyway, it

11:57

would always be the same. You would have to put.

12:00

off sense and notion.

12:03

Any notion you had of what this was about, let it

12:05

go, leave it outside. It's like God

12:07

saying to Moses, take off those shoes from off

12:09

their feet. Just unbuckle it, leave

12:11

it behind. So you're not here to

12:13

verify, instruct yourself, or inform curiosity, or

12:16

carry report. That's about five or six

12:18

reasons why most people go to places.

12:21

Says, forget it. And then he

12:23

says, really simple language, you are

12:25

here to kneel where

12:27

prayer has been valid. And

12:30

then comes that beautiful thing that prayer

12:32

is more than an order of words and so on.

12:34

You're here to be in this moment. And

12:37

I take great pleasure from this. And

12:39

I particularly used to take pleasure bringing

12:41

groups of students from

12:43

Cambridge and reading this to them in

12:45

the chapel, because like

12:47

it's an uber-competitive place. Everybody's trying to do

12:49

better than everybody else. Everybody cares about their

12:51

marks, you know, and then later on when

12:53

we're in social media, everybody wants more like,

12:55

you know, it's a very burdened,

12:58

work-driven. You've got to do stuff

13:01

and prove yourself. And

13:03

Elliot just says, just take all

13:05

that off. Put

13:07

it off, take it away. You're not going to

13:10

do any of that. Just kneel and receive. And that

13:12

when people get that, it's

13:15

so beautiful and refreshing when it happens, you

13:17

know. When

13:20

we had our talks together, Kirsten pointed this

13:22

out. We could take this stanza as guidelines

13:25

for contemplative prayer. Totally.

13:27

So we could walk through each one

13:30

and see how in contemplative prayer, contemplative

13:33

prayer embodies this very thing. So you'd

13:35

have to put off sense and notion.

13:37

So when you kneel in contemplative prayer,

13:39

you'd have to put off any previous

13:42

sense. One, what the senses are

13:44

able to touch and see and feel, but

13:46

also your sense, all your assumptions about what

13:48

it was about. Being finite

13:50

are completely inadequate here. And

13:53

you're not here for a report to kind of

13:55

go back, what are you going to say? What

13:58

are you going to explain? You're not here to... prove

14:00

anything because it's God. And

14:03

so because we don't need to do anything

14:05

because it's already achieved and dying words of

14:07

Jesus on the cross, it is consummated. But

14:10

we need to do something. We need

14:12

to kneel and be receptively open because

14:14

love's never imposed, it's always offered. And

14:17

so this is the devotional sincerity of

14:19

prayer in which comes

14:21

all into the open here. Does

14:24

that, how does that strike you too, Malcolm? That

14:26

I absolutely agree with all of that. And

14:28

I think, I mean, there's a paradox here,

14:30

isn't there? On the

14:33

one hand, we're so used

14:35

to sense and nation and we're so used to

14:37

all our busy verifying and instructing

14:39

ourselves and informing and all that, you know

14:41

what I mean? It's kind of been part

14:43

of our routine of self

14:46

justification. So in one way, it's

14:48

quite hard to undo all that, it's quite scary to leave

14:50

it behind. So it's a hard thing.

14:52

But on the other hand, it's kind of the

14:54

easiest thing in the world to do because that

14:56

stuff has been screwing us up and weighing us

14:58

down for years. So to

15:01

have an invitation to just totally let it go,

15:05

it's kind of wonderful, you know?

15:08

The whole first part of this poem is about

15:10

how we approach this moment where

15:12

we can kneel. But he

15:14

prepares us for it in the earlier bit where he appears

15:16

to be only describing the heat and the light and the

15:18

roads and the ditches and the hedges. But

15:21

he's already given you this idea of something that's frozen

15:23

up, finally being unfrozen.

15:26

And he gives you the idea, this beautiful image

15:28

of the soul sap quivering. There's

15:30

something in you that's been waiting for this moment, waiting

15:32

for this to be allowed. You

15:35

know, and the soul sap I think is really

15:37

important because I think it obliquely refers to

15:39

Jesus saying, I am the vine and you are

15:42

the branches, abide in me. Without

15:44

me, you can do nothing. So

15:46

finally at last be rooted into this

15:49

branch, let the soul sap come up,

15:52

you know, from the root of Christ and not from

15:54

some dumb thing you think you have to do. I

15:57

mean, we actually are going to look at this passage later. You

16:00

know, in burnt Norton, we had, as

16:02

it were, the ghost of a fire. The place has

16:04

burnt down, you know. People have lost

16:06

their lives. And

16:08

we have the roses. We have the image of the

16:10

fire and the image of the rose, but they're sort

16:12

of separate. We've turned from the burnt place to

16:15

look at the roses. A

16:17

rose, of course, is sometimes a symbol

16:20

of the fleetingness of time. You

16:22

know, gather ye rosebuds while ye may all time.

16:25

Here's a flying, and sure the flower that smiles

16:27

today tomorrow will be dying. There's

16:30

something eternal about the rose. And as he comes towards

16:32

Dante in this, we suddenly get the rose. And

16:35

I don't think you probably know that, although

16:37

it's set in little Gidding, he was

16:39

writing it in London during the Blitz. And

16:43

the bombs were falling everywhere. And

16:46

he was a fire watcher. So he actually went

16:48

out, you know, onto the streets in the early

16:50

morning after the dawn raids and

16:53

reported back where fires were so

16:55

that the ambulances could get there.

16:57

He was an American who stayed with us in the

16:59

war rather than leaving, you know. I

17:01

think the extraordinary thing where, in a terrible

17:03

destructive way, fire and

17:06

rose come together. When he sees this house,

17:08

it's like one whole story. It's

17:10

just dust in the air suspended, marks

17:13

the place where a story ended. Ash

17:15

on an old man's sleeve as

17:18

all the ash-burnt roses leave. For

17:20

a moment, rose and fire come

17:22

together destructively. And he shows

17:24

you the bleakness of our kind of the wars of

17:26

our all that

17:28

happens because we don't reside in Christ. And

17:31

then, you know, he takes those

17:33

two images at the end, the very same image

17:35

of the rose and the fire. And

17:37

he brings them together at the end of the poem in

17:39

the eternal fire of God's love. It's just almost

17:43

too wonderful to give words to what he does in

17:45

this poem. What do

17:47

you make of this staying on the same theme for a

17:49

moment? You know what this also, I

17:52

think, there's so many moments in Scripture that embodied

17:54

this. When Moses,

17:56

when they're in exile, and Moses

17:59

is out walking, alone in the wilderness,

18:02

and he sees the bush burning, but

18:04

it's not burning up. That

18:07

is, he's beyond cause-effect relationship.

18:10

That's obviously one of the kind of great

18:12

turning points, great moments of Scripture. And

18:14

I mean, lots of biblical commentators from the

18:16

early fathers onwards saw this

18:18

bush, which is still a bush, it's

18:20

still rooted, it's never lost any of its

18:23

bushiness, and yet it's a flame with the

18:25

divine presence. They saw that

18:27

as a foreshadowing of the coming of

18:29

Christ. The impossible union that he

18:32

has fully human nature and fully divine

18:34

nature. And his divine

18:36

nature doesn't burn up or destroy

18:38

or override his human nature any

18:41

more than the bush is consumed. So

18:44

it seems to me that the bush is

18:46

not only symbolic of those moments of illumination

18:48

that we've been talking about throughout, but

18:50

it is also a biblical foreshadowing of the coming

18:52

of Jesus, I think. What do you think

18:55

of this idea too? We think

18:57

of the birth of Jesus, the life of

18:59

Jesus, the suffering of Jesus, the death of

19:01

Jesus, and the resurrection of Jesus. But

19:04

what if actually they're all collapsed as

19:06

the true nature of the present moment?

19:09

That is the burning bush, you

19:12

know, of the divinity of what it immediately

19:14

is. It's like non-sequential

19:17

holiness, concretely manifested

19:19

in very concrete images

19:22

of burning bush, and

19:24

he's trying to sensitize us to this. How

19:27

does that strike you? What do you make of it? Well,

19:30

I think, of course, we experience things in

19:32

time because we're in time. But

19:34

if God is eternal, then every moment of

19:36

time is equally and eternally present to him.

19:40

So he sees the crucifixion and the resurrection, and

19:42

he is, and he's in the crucifixion and the

19:44

resurrection in some sense at the same

19:46

moment, although they're sequenced out for us. So

19:49

I think there's a lot in that. Towards

19:52

the end of this poem, he's kind of channeling

19:55

a lot of Dante, and Dante,

19:57

you may remember, gets finally up into the

19:59

imperial. He thinks he's

20:01

been traveling out, you know, from the center,

20:03

the earth, up through all these different spheres

20:05

of heaven and then the sphere of fire

20:08

and everything, the prima mobili. So he thinks

20:10

he's going to find God on this, you

20:12

know, final height, outer edge. But

20:14

when he gets there, he experiences

20:16

a complete paradigm

20:19

and perspective shift. And he realizes he's

20:21

been traveling into a center, and

20:23

it's the center of the rose. And

20:26

that all the things of time and the

20:28

beings are folding out like petals and the

20:30

angels are going back and forth like bees.

20:32

And he was always traveling in towards this

20:34

center. And what he sees in the

20:36

center is love. I mean, the last line of the

20:38

poem is the love that moves the sun and the

20:40

other stars. And I think

20:42

there's something like this going on at the end of

20:44

this poem, particularly when he

20:46

says, and the fire and the

20:49

rose are one. When he quotes Julian and says,

20:52

he takes all those moments that we had

20:54

and got left, and it goes, quick, now,

20:56

here, now, always a condition

20:59

of complete simplicity costing

21:01

not less than everything. And

21:04

then Julian, all shall be well and all

21:06

manner of things shall be well. But this,

21:08

when the tongues of flame are enfolded into

21:10

the crown and not of fire and

21:13

the fire and the rose are one. It seems

21:15

to me to be, again, one of the supreme

21:18

lines of mystical poetry. Turning

21:25

to the mystics will continue in a moment.

21:46

So what I'm hearing is the fire of suffering

21:48

and the fire of transformation are

21:51

one. And that's the pattern that

21:53

this poem has been pointing to. And Jim,

21:56

you brought up Pentecost, too, as one of these points of

21:58

love. for

22:00

fire? Yes. Do we burn

22:02

by pyre or pyre? So

22:04

this, the poem's going to end this way too.

22:06

There is the fire of the burning of

22:09

the falling away of all things in time. And

22:11

the burning when we're caught in that is

22:14

if it's claustrophobic, it's one dimensional, you

22:16

know, or nothing but the self that

22:18

things happen to. But then there's

22:20

a fire of Pentecost, as fire

22:22

by fire. And the fire of Pentecost,

22:24

I love this phrase in John of the Cross, to have

22:26

no light to guide you except the one that burns in

22:28

your heart. There

22:30

is this timeless divine fire

22:32

that's actually burning in

22:35

the midst of our suffering, in the midst of

22:37

our daily life. And that's another seminal

22:39

thing that starts emerging out of little

22:41

getting. Malcolm, what do you make

22:43

of that? How do you... Well, I agree with you. This is the

22:45

Pentecost. You know that the four

22:47

quartets were also, you know, I talked about

22:49

how patterned they are, the music. So

22:52

one of the patterns is they took the ancient four

22:55

elements out of which everything is made. And

22:57

each quartet reflects one. Burnt

23:00

Norton is air. There's a lot about the air in

23:02

the air and echoes in music. East

23:04

Coker is earth and Dry Selve edges is

23:06

water. But the fourth element, of course, is

23:09

fire. So this is the fire quartet. He

23:12

gets you straight there. He's looking

23:14

at this light reflected. It's

23:16

midwinter spring. There's a kind of spring in the middle

23:18

of winter. And then he says, a

23:21

glow more intense than

23:23

blaze of branch. I

23:26

think there's a burning bush. A

23:28

glow more intense than blaze of

23:30

branch or burning brazier. Stirs

23:33

the dumb spirit. No

23:36

wind, but Pentecostal

23:38

fire in the dark

23:40

time of the year. He's getting us ready.

23:43

And when he's in the bit about the Blitz,

23:46

he talks about the terrible thing of the kind

23:48

of anti-Pentecost, if you like, of fire from

23:50

heaven in the sense of these bombs being dropped.

23:54

And he calls the liftwaffe planes as they're going back. He

23:56

says, after the dark dove with the

23:58

flickering tongue and pulse, below the horizon

24:00

of his homing. And then he

24:03

says, which fire do we want to have here? You

24:05

know? Then he gives you

24:07

the great lyric, the dove, this is the

24:09

real dove, the dove descending breaks

24:11

the air, but again it's not sentimental.

24:13

The dove descending breaks the air with

24:15

flame of incandescent terror, of

24:18

which the tongues declare that one

24:20

release from sin or error, the only

24:22

hope or else despair, lies

24:24

in the choice of fire or fire to

24:27

be redeemed from fire by fire. And

24:29

it's the fire of, if you like,

24:31

time burning everything up, you know, the

24:33

cauldron of our lusts, all that

24:36

stuff. It's another fire. That fire has

24:38

to be answered by fire, and it's the other fire, the

24:40

fire of the dove descending, which

24:43

is the one that redeems us. We are redeemed

24:45

from fire by fire. I

24:47

mean, it's astonishing writing. And then, you

24:50

know, he's, oh, Julian, who then devises

24:52

the torment? Love.

24:56

Love is the

24:59

unfamiliar name behind the hands that

25:01

wove the intolerable shed of flame, which

25:04

human power cannot remove. We

25:06

only live, only suspect, consumed

25:09

by either fire or

25:11

fire. That's absolutely astonishing.

25:15

It's amazing how, without

25:17

saying the name of Jesus, without saying the name

25:20

of God, without saying the name of Christ, that

25:22

there's so much of that underlying with

25:25

poem. Yeah. So

25:27

it's beautiful to hear that drawn out. Yeah. And

25:30

this is doing a great thing with this, because there's huge numbers

25:32

of people who aren't Christian and who might not like whatever

25:35

brand of Christianity they happen to have seen in

25:38

their neighborhood, who will read this

25:40

poem and love it. But the more they love

25:42

it and then read it, the more they're going to be drawn to Christ. You know, I,

25:45

Eliot's faith is a very real thing, and I was born real fruit

25:47

in the world, I think. What I love about it, too, it's

25:51

got a deep respect for all mystical

25:53

traditions, the way he brings in

25:55

the Bhagavad Gita, the lotus

25:57

flower, you know, Buddhism. That's

26:00

the kind of Christianity I'm interested in, that

26:02

stands in respect of all mystical

26:04

traditions, the impossible union. Yeah,

26:08

and in fact he starts with, in the

26:10

little preface, before the poem starts at all,

26:12

he has these quotations from

26:15

Heraclitus, you know,

26:17

he's a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher. He

26:20

says, and it's Heraclitus on, if you read

26:22

it, you'll notice that the second

26:24

word in the Greek is logus, the logos.

26:27

The Heraclitus means, although the word logos,

26:30

and he's not letting that word fall,

26:32

although the word is common to all,

26:35

most men live as if they had

26:37

a private wisdom of their own. I'm

26:41

reading from the little epigraphs at the

26:43

beginning of the poem, to Logo Deontos,

26:46

Suno Tsun, Apole,

26:49

I'm translating the Greek, but

26:51

it means, although the word is common to

26:53

all, men live

26:55

as if they had a private wisdom of their

26:58

own. That's a really

27:00

interesting thing to have said, because it

27:02

is personal part, you know, he's got lots of his

27:04

own stuff in it, but actually, I think what he's

27:06

trying to restore to us is the logos, which

27:09

is common to all. You

27:11

know, I want to move on to where he meets the

27:13

master at the dead man. And

27:15

I could draw it, it will kind of be ending

27:17

on this too, because it leads into the rose and

27:20

so on. So I'd like to share a few thoughts so you

27:23

could pick up on it and share it. And

27:25

of course, it's the patrols that he would make going out

27:27

to check with the fire, you know, he's out walking

27:30

the street, and he meets

27:32

a dead master, and he refers to

27:34

the master as a compound ghost. And

27:37

I think the compound ghost are the masters

27:39

he's been quoting throughout the whole poem. So

27:42

it's St. John of the Cross, it's

27:44

the Bhagavad Gita, it's Krishna talking to

27:46

argument, you know, that no one ever

27:48

dies. As it references

27:50

to the Buddha, the lotus rose slowly

27:52

from the stream, the middle way of

27:55

the Buddha. And then

27:57

primarily though, it's really this Christian

27:59

imagery. We

34:01

shall not cease from exploration, and

34:04

the end of all our exploring will be

34:06

to arrive where we started and

34:08

know the place for the first time." That's

34:11

beautiful. Yes, it's lovely. To

34:14

the unknown, unremembered gate, when

34:17

the last of earth left to

34:19

discover is that which was the

34:21

beginning, at the source of the

34:23

longest river, the voice of the

34:25

hidden waterfall, and the children in the apple

34:28

tree, referring back to Bert Norton, echoing

34:30

all this again. Not

34:33

known because not looked for, but

34:35

heard, half heard, in the stillness

34:38

between two waves of the sea,

34:40

quick now, here now, always,

34:44

a condition of complete simplicity. I

34:46

love that. Costing

34:48

nothing less than everything. My

34:50

Sir Eckhart says, it steals the soul

34:53

from itself. That is, it

34:55

steals from the soul the ability to

34:57

live by its own

34:59

resources, anything less than the infinite love

35:01

of God, or just

35:03

unraveled. It's the view from

35:05

the cross, too, I think, for

35:07

Jesus. And all shall be well,

35:10

and all matter think shall be all, Julian.

35:12

When the tongues of flame are enfolded, and

35:14

the crown not of fire, and the fire

35:17

and the rose are one. And my sense

35:19

is this, it gives echoing Dante the rose.

35:22

Another thing I think in this, what do you see this? The

35:25

fire and the rose are one, is

35:27

that the fire of our suffering, and

35:30

the fire of Pentecost, the deliverance from

35:32

suffering, are one. There's

35:35

a mysterious alchemy of

35:37

the suffering, and the deliverance from

35:39

suffering. It's kind of

35:42

a mystical quickening, or a

35:44

realization of the oneness of

35:46

birth and death, and gain and loss and

35:48

suffering and joy. And

35:51

he's inviting us to hope. How

35:53

does that strike you, what I'm saying here? Well,

35:55

I think if we just speak

35:57

of redeeming time, or if we speak of redeeming time,

35:59

we at all, then everything

36:01

has to be redeemed, including

36:04

suffering. So it's not enough to say, oh, thank

36:06

God my suffering's over. No, I'm in heaven. You

36:08

know, I think, you know, it'd be reasonable to

36:10

say, well, why did I suffer in the first

36:12

place? But if I can

36:15

discover that in my suffering is this extraordinary

36:17

fire of God's love, is this deepening of

36:19

the soul, then it's given the

36:21

one thing it really needs, which is meaning.

36:24

I mean, it's very interesting. If you

36:26

look at medieval doom paintings,

36:28

you know, paintings of the judgment, you

36:31

see God up in the heavens and you see the divine

36:35

worship in the angels, the seraphs and the

36:37

cherubim. And the seraphs are, of

36:39

course, traditionally, they're fiery. They're ablaze with the

36:41

fire of God's love and the very fire

36:43

of God's loving presence. And it

36:46

flows down the sides of the pictures. And

36:48

then there's Christ in the middle there. And insofar

36:50

as there's a scene of hell at the bottom,

36:53

it's the same fire experienced

36:55

differently. There's

36:57

no place that isn't the divine love. But

37:01

we can either let that, we

37:03

can kneel where prayer is, we can

37:05

let that be the utterly transformative thing

37:07

and become the rose. One

37:09

final note. Tell me how this strikes you, picking up

37:11

on what you're saying. Is there a way

37:14

that Christ rose with this wound? Absolutely. Yeah,

37:16

that's essential. But the wound is transformed

37:18

by glory. And that's another big

37:20

theme in the... Well, that's a very big theme in...

37:23

Obviously, when Eliot quotes somebody, he usually wants you to remember

37:25

all of it, as it were. The quote is just like

37:27

the little thread, you pull the rest of it out. So

37:30

in Julian's revelation of divine love, of

37:32

course, you get this parable or story

37:34

of the servant who falls

37:36

into the pit and is wounded with many thorns.

37:39

But in the vision, the servant comes out

37:41

and every one of the wounds has become

37:44

a jewel. So I think

37:46

it's really vital that we see the wounds

37:48

of Christ, as the hymn says, in beauty

37:50

glorified. And I think that's

37:52

all in the redeemed from fire by fire.

37:55

I want to end with this. This has been

37:58

such a grace, Malcolm, that you joined us. Really,

38:00

it's blessed me. And I know

38:02

it'll bless the listeners. I

38:04

think they'll so resonate with this. I

38:07

feel such an affinity with you. I

38:09

feel a strong affinity with you. I will love

38:11

the same poem for the same reasons here. And

38:13

that's very good. It's been a joy to

38:15

meet you and a joy to be part of this podcast. And

38:18

to be honest, you know, I'll enthuse about

38:20

this poem anytime with anyone, you know? I

38:23

just love it, you know. Yeah. Yeah. Well, thank

38:25

you for being with us, Malcolm, today. And thank

38:27

you, Jim. And what

38:29

a beautiful way to close this season

38:32

of turning to the mystic. So thank

38:34

you. Do

38:52

you feel called to walk a more

38:54

contemplative path? The Center

38:56

for Action and Contemplation is

38:59

an educational nonprofit supporting the

39:01

journey of inner transformation. Our

39:04

programs and resources will help

39:06

grow your consciousness, deepen your

39:08

prayer practice, and strengthen your

39:10

compassionate engagement with the world.

39:14

Learn more about our

39:16

resources, such as publications,

39:18

podcasts, email series, and

39:20

events at www.cac.org.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features