Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Released Saturday, 5th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Radio War Nerd EP 513 — The Great White Oaf, feat. Dan Boeckner

Saturday, 5th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:20

Hello and welcome to

0:22

another episode of Radio

0:24

Warner. The day today

0:26

is April 3rd 2025

0:28

and this is episode

0:30

513. I am the

0:32

co-host Mark Ames in

0:34

Western New York near

0:37

the Canadian border near

0:39

the shores of Lake Ontario.

0:41

I'm telling you it's

0:43

going to be renamed.

0:45

It's gonna happen, gonna

0:47

do it. And I'm

0:49

on the line with

0:52

the Warner, John Dolan,

0:54

A.K. Gary Bretcher in

0:56

transit on his way

0:58

to Mexico, but you're

1:00

still in Italy, right, John?

1:02

Yeah, I'm on the outskirts

1:05

of Rome. We had to book

1:07

a place after I

1:09

got injured. Nothing serious,

1:12

but I was laid up for

1:14

a while. The amazing

1:16

thing to me is how perfect

1:18

the Italian countryside looks.

1:21

It looks like it

1:23

still has a few

1:25

giant Latifundi worked by

1:27

slaves, except they don't

1:29

have slaves anymore. They

1:31

have like automatic mowers.

1:33

And we have with

1:35

us, let's get right to

1:38

our guest, we have with us

1:40

a longtime friend of the show.

1:42

Dan Beckner, Dan of the

1:45

great band Wolf Parade, and

1:47

also had a great podcast,

1:50

which I guess is in

1:52

temporary suspension. I'm

1:54

not sure, the bottleman. It's

1:57

in cold stasis right

1:59

now. Okay. political forces rearranged

2:01

themselves. Cryogenically frozen, like Disney's

2:04

brain, ahead or something? Like

2:06

Ripley at the end of

2:09

Alien will be extracted

2:11

in 54 years. Dan, first

2:13

of all, welcome to the

2:16

show, glad to have

2:18

you here. Glad to be here.

2:20

We're gonna be discussing Canada

2:23

today. We did an episode

2:25

on Greenland, which is. primary

2:27

target number one of the

2:30

Trump imperial presidency

2:32

and Canada appears to

2:34

be another potential target at

2:37

least the Canadians from what

2:39

I've heard from Canadians like

2:41

in big media outlets

2:43

and stuff like it like they're

2:46

they take it very seriously

2:48

there Trump's threats. I mean

2:50

I guess you have to

2:52

given America's size and craziness.

2:54

I think we'll figure out on this

2:56

show, like as we go through all

2:59

of this, I think we're going to

3:01

realize that Canada is both overly

3:03

terrified of the United States

3:05

and at the same time underestimates

3:07

how absolutely fucked our

3:10

country is because of

3:12

foreign policy decisions that

3:14

we've made over the last 25

3:16

to 30 years. So yeah, well that's

3:18

a great way to introduce it. But

3:20

first of all, as you may have

3:22

been able to hear... A little

3:24

bit of an oo there, but

3:27

Dan of course is Canadian.

3:29

Dan is from, you're

3:31

from British Columbia, right?

3:34

Yeah, I'm from Vancouver

3:36

Island, originally, where John

3:38

had a sort of

3:40

trinoble level exposure to

3:42

the dark side of

3:45

Canada. Happy memories how

3:47

they linger. Victoria, what

3:49

a nice place. You

3:51

know, Victoria and British

3:53

Columbia. There's a D.H.

3:56

Lawrence poem, something like,

3:58

The English are so nice. And

4:00

so nice about being

4:02

nice. If you're not

4:04

nice, they soon let

4:06

you feel it. That's

4:09

true. John, as Dan

4:11

brought up, John, you had

4:13

a place on a lake on

4:16

Victoria Island where you

4:18

wrote your great. Vancouver.

4:21

I'm sorry, Vancouver.

4:24

Oh. Am I mixing them up? Wait,

4:26

Victoria is on Vancouver Island. Victoria

4:28

is unfortunately on Vancouver Island. Victoria

4:30

is unfortunately on Vancouver is the

4:32

provincial capital and Vancouver is the

4:35

biggest city in British Columbia. That's

4:37

on the main lane. So yeah.

4:39

It's all going to be part

4:41

of the United States soon anyway.

4:43

Exactly. It's going to be Seattle

4:46

Islands. They'll be Washington, British

4:48

Columbia. Yeah. Everything will just

4:50

be McKinley. So yeah, John

4:53

wrote a great poetry book

4:55

there stuck up and and

4:57

then John went back

4:59

again many years later

5:02

Having had some good

5:04

memories there from his

5:06

earlier time and Well, the

5:08

sequel was John's go

5:11

home again proof number two

5:13

million 75 The mistake is

5:15

you tried to move to

5:18

the metropolitan, you know, on

5:20

Vancouver Island, which is, yeah,

5:22

the sort of dark center.

5:24

The second we landed there,

5:27

the university offered me a job,

5:29

and I thought that was too good

5:31

to refuse. That was a

5:33

mistake. That was a mistake.

5:35

Yeah, you can check in

5:38

any time you like. Yeah.

5:40

But you leave at the

5:42

end of the semester because

5:45

you forgot to file an

5:47

application which they didn't tell

5:49

you about. Yeah. You've always

5:52

been the tenured professor at

5:54

University of Interior job. Oh

5:56

dear. So, um, so Dan, I'm

5:58

not even sure where. exactly

6:00

to start here. I mean, first,

6:03

you just did, as you were

6:05

saying before the show, Walt Parade

6:07

just did a Canada-only tour. Was

6:09

this a farewell to the late state

6:11

of Canada? Or was it? I mean,

6:14

it wasn't meant as a farewell. It

6:16

was meant as a, you know, I'm

6:18

in a different position than a

6:20

lot of my colleagues and, you

6:22

know, bandmates, and that I live

6:24

and work in the United States.

6:26

I live in Ohio. I've been

6:29

here. for over a year, I live

6:31

in Columbus, I like living in

6:33

Columbus, like it's kind of like

6:35

nothing ever happens. Yeah, I know

6:38

that feeling. I moved from Montreal

6:40

to New Orleans, which is crazy

6:42

and, you know, experiencing, New Orleans

6:45

is kind of on the razor's

6:47

edge of everything else America is

6:49

about to experience, you know, wealth

6:52

inequality, climate precarity. And, and my

6:54

partner and I decided, you know,

6:56

let's... Let's decamp for the Great

6:59

Lakes. And we've been in Columbus

7:01

for about a year, so I'm,

7:03

you know, I'm aware of Canadian

7:06

news, but for all intents and

7:08

purposes, you know, I'm functioning

7:10

as an American. So to

7:12

go back to Canada and

7:14

do that tour was really

7:17

interesting because everyone I ran

7:19

into, you know, friends, family were

7:21

like, asking me, like, is it

7:23

Bedlam on the streets? what is

7:25

it like living in Trump's

7:28

America? And what I told

7:30

them was it's it first of

7:32

all depends on where you live

7:34

in this country and it also

7:37

is not all that much

7:39

different than Joe Biden's America.

7:41

It's like this it's like

7:43

every day is like Sunday here.

7:45

It just gets a little

7:47

bit worse all the time

7:50

just like it does in

7:52

Canada. Yeah, the Trump revolution

7:54

has mostly been secretive

7:57

about its allegiance.

7:59

Like, unless they gather

8:02

in very large numbers

8:04

in certain safe areas,

8:06

like in suburban California

8:08

where I'm from, they,

8:11

I'm sure most people,

8:13

most voters are pro-

8:16

trump, but I don't think

8:18

it's quite cool to say

8:20

that or to announce it

8:22

yet. Yeah. And with the,

8:25

with the incoming, you

8:27

know, economic pain. It's going

8:29

to become less and less cool

8:31

over time. Yeah. Yeah, I think

8:34

it's starting to go there now.

8:36

Because it's one of those things

8:38

where people didn't believe it. I

8:40

think what we're seeing and like

8:43

with the announcement of the tariffs

8:45

yesterday, which Germany's vice

8:47

chancellor said that this was

8:50

as big of a sort of turning

8:52

point moment for Germany as

8:54

the Ukraine war. Wow. Just

8:56

came out and said that today.

8:58

I guess he means by that

9:00

sort of the political shock,

9:03

but that's a really bad

9:05

analogy for Germany. I was

9:07

just like the Ukraine war,

9:10

which Germany should have done

9:12

a lot more to head off,

9:14

but the Ukraine war has resulted

9:17

in suicide for

9:19

Germany. Its economies

9:21

and shambles and

9:23

the political mainstream

9:25

is... in shambles and the AFD,

9:27

that post-Nazi party, I saw

9:29

the latest poll, they're tied

9:32

now for number one. They're

9:34

tied for number one in

9:36

the latest poll. People seem lately

9:38

to love to use Ukraine as

9:41

an analogy for something that they

9:43

are correct about, but not in

9:46

the way they intend. Yes, yes,

9:48

exactly. Yeah, we're talking here about

9:50

Jason Stanley. This might be

9:52

an interesting place to start.

9:55

I mean, what we want

9:57

to talk about today is

9:59

Canada. and how much Canada

10:01

is really like what would

10:03

a war with Canada really be

10:06

like who would side with the

10:08

US who would fight the US

10:10

what can Canada do what

10:12

would Canada do and yeah Dan

10:15

here just mentioned this

10:17

Vanity Fair article that

10:19

or interview with Jason Stanley

10:22

one of the two

10:24

Yale professors along with

10:26

Timothy Snyder, who's kind of

10:28

his mentor, I think, his

10:30

career mentor anyway. They

10:33

very publicly told everyone,

10:35

we've seen fascism before, you have

10:37

to stand up and fight it.

10:39

Now we're leaving, we're going to

10:42

Toronto, we got a good job

10:44

there, but you guys really need

10:46

to stand up or you're just

10:48

not worthy of your democracy. And

10:50

here's, and this photo of him.

10:53

Oh God. The vanity of this

10:55

guy. John, have you seen

10:57

this? Yeah, he's carefully stroking

10:59

his thoughtful chin and

11:01

standing up against a brick

11:03

wall, which would be an

11:06

idea. But yeah, he's very

11:08

thoughtful and he looks like

11:10

he's about to say, whatever

11:12

it is, he said at

11:14

the end of that article,

11:17

like, are you fucking kidding

11:19

man? Like, he's really streety

11:21

and real. I mean it's

11:23

beyond parody that like Stanley

11:26

and Snyder since Maidan I

11:28

guess and definitely since the

11:30

Russian invasion of Ukraine

11:33

have been you know

11:35

encouraging finger-wagging

11:37

at the Russian public to

11:40

rise up against Putin

11:42

and now they're just like

11:44

oh we're gonna go to we're

11:46

gonna go to Toronto where it's

11:49

safe. It's the slightest

11:51

width of fascism, you

11:53

know. And I guarantee

11:55

they negotiated the terms

11:58

too. Oh yeah. Got

12:00

to, okay, I've got a

12:02

parking spot and it's a

12:04

Tuesday, Thursday schedule. Yeah. And

12:07

I want a semester off

12:09

and you know, you're paying

12:11

me at. Tenured Proff 27

12:13

raid. Yeah, and they're like, well,

12:15

we're going to have to fire

12:18

a couple more adjuncts. Screw the,

12:20

screw the adjuncts. Fascism is on

12:22

the line, man. Yeah, yeah, it's

12:24

very important. I mean, we all

12:26

have to make sacrifices. This, I

12:28

mean, I've read this a couple

12:30

of times now and, you know,

12:33

I've also read, you know, Snyder,

12:35

just being a blow-hard about about,

12:37

about all this. And it really

12:39

made me think of, It made me

12:42

think that in my

12:44

experience musicians dealing with

12:46

fascism are often braver

12:48

than professors because... Oh yeah. I

12:50

have a group of friends who

12:52

are in a band in Myanmar

12:54

called Side Effect and they

12:56

eventually left but they lived

12:58

through the entire coup that happened,

13:01

you know, several years ago and

13:03

they were targeted, they were on

13:05

lists for being seditious and they

13:07

fought in the street in the street

13:10

and... You know, and then they left

13:12

when there were no other options available

13:14

to them or their families. You

13:16

know, that's that's a lot

13:18

different than Trump getting elected

13:21

and then and then just

13:23

decamping to Toronto. And the other

13:25

thing that made me think of was, uh,

13:27

well, I guess this is dispersed by

13:29

first point, but Amanda Palmer, who

13:31

was in a band called the

13:34

Dresden dolls, when Trump got elected

13:36

the first time. wrote an incredible

13:38

piece in The Guardian explaining

13:40

why she was leaving America

13:43

and why Trump getting elected would

13:45

be so good for the punk

13:47

rock community in this country.

13:49

That we were, that we,

13:51

quote, quote, quote, we were

13:53

going to create powerful music

13:56

that would create seismic shifts

13:58

in the political landscape. I

14:00

envy you guys having this

14:02

environment, but you know, it's

14:04

not for me. That's the

14:06

tone. It was just like,

14:08

I wish I could be

14:10

there and enjoy the, the,

14:12

the Weimar energy of. But

14:14

I'm with you there in

14:16

spirit, believe me. Yeah, yeah,

14:18

exactly. Yeah, so it's a

14:20

new band with Liza Minnelli

14:22

and I just did the

14:24

whole thing. Cabaret, too. Yeah.

14:26

So the subheader here says,

14:28

you know, Jason Stanley is

14:30

leaving the US for Canada,

14:33

quote, the Ukraine of North

14:35

America. And the, yeah, I

14:37

know, like, wow. So obviously

14:39

what he means is the

14:41

Ukraine, the fictitious mythical Ukraine

14:43

that I and Timothy Snyder

14:45

and others in the media

14:47

have created, nothing at all

14:49

like the real Ukraine where.

14:51

Males are literally hiding. I mean, there

14:53

are so many Anne Franks. And not

14:55

to belittle the Holocaust, but I

14:58

mean, in terms of hiding out, like

15:00

even mainstream media reports on this,

15:02

this isn't just how the Ukrainian

15:04

media reports on it. It is

15:06

a huge widespread problem. Males of

15:08

any conscription age will not go

15:10

out of the house. And when

15:12

they do, you see what happens.

15:14

And I've noticed a huge uptick

15:16

even in the last month or

15:19

two. of videos of, of, you

15:21

know, the territorial, the forced

15:23

mobilization crews. Doing all,

15:26

you know, they, they have, their new

15:28

thing is like if you see

15:30

somebody youngish or male

15:32

on a bicycle, you open your

15:34

van door on them and knock

15:36

them off it and all that

15:38

kind of shit. So yeah, the

15:41

Ukraine of North America,

15:43

damn, that's, that's sad for,

15:45

for Canada, is there any

15:47

truth to that? I mean,

15:49

yeah, exactly. Well, we're similar

15:51

to Ukraine in that we

15:54

will applaud like an excess,

15:56

an excess officer in Parliament.

15:58

We will get the most

16:00

standing ovation. But also, you

16:02

know, it's, and you know, maybe

16:04

some Canadians now would disagree

16:06

as we scramble to

16:09

find a national identity that

16:11

is separate from the United

16:13

States. But, yes, that's a

16:15

good point. But, you know,

16:17

you have a. small, not

16:19

geographically, but you have a

16:22

smaller country by population that

16:24

is rich in natural resources,

16:26

that is culturally indistinguishable from

16:28

its neighbor who is heavily

16:30

armed and militaristic. So yes.

16:32

Yeah, yeah, that's a good

16:35

point. Yeah, but it's as

16:37

they get threatened, I would imagine,

16:39

I mean, I'm seeing it,

16:41

I've never seen Canadian nationalism

16:44

before. Yeah, we covered it a

16:46

bit on bottleman. I mean, we

16:48

tried to cover it on bottleman

16:51

because I and we can get

16:53

in this deeper when we talk

16:55

about the Canadian nationalism that is

16:58

openly distinct from American. I guess

17:00

I think the Canadian elite

17:02

used to avoid nationalism, but

17:05

I think it was pretty

17:07

common. The lower you went down the

17:09

social scale. I mean, a lot of

17:11

people felt like when I was

17:13

living on the houseboat, a lot of

17:16

people felt either that the Albany Valley

17:18

was their country, and one of

17:20

them said that to me, or

17:22

that they were Canadian and we

17:25

definitely weren't American. Right. And that's,

17:27

I think the two strains of

17:30

Canadian nationalism right there is that

17:32

you have a sort of, I

17:34

wouldn't necessarily call it a more

17:36

liberal strain because growing up in

17:39

that exact same area, John, you're

17:41

familiar with the demographics of. you

17:44

know, you've got rednecks and hippies

17:46

and they kind of become indistinguishable

17:48

from each other. Absolutely. Like, so

17:51

I wouldn't say it's left or

17:53

liberal. That's a very left coast

17:56

thing, isn't it? Because it's the

17:58

same in Northern California. I mean,

18:00

north of San Francisco, the

18:02

crossover between hippie and redneck.

18:04

Well, you'll be talking to

18:06

somebody about, let's say, the

18:08

MK Ultra program, or how,

18:10

you know, the CIA's Adventures

18:13

post-Second World War, and you'll

18:15

be nodding along with them

18:17

as they're talking about Gladio

18:19

or whatever, and then they'll

18:21

mention something about, like, a

18:23

six million, I don't know. Yeah,

18:25

they'd be Trump voters for sure. Yeah,

18:27

yeah. Yeah, but I guess there's those

18:30

two strains. One strain is, one strain

18:32

is an older strain that continues,

18:34

which is a Canadian

18:37

nationalism is defined as an opposition

18:39

to the United States, kind of

18:41

like, at least we're not American.

18:43

So if they're talking to American,

18:45

they'll be like, well, at least

18:47

we don't do X, Y, and

18:49

Z. That was a big thing. in

18:51

the Cold War years, or at least the

18:53

latter part of the Cold War years. I

18:56

don't know about the post- Cold War

18:58

years, but I remember people would

19:00

want to travel younger people,

19:02

students, left-wingers, would, you know,

19:04

ideally would either be Canadian and

19:07

show off their Canadianness and

19:09

that they're not American, or

19:11

sometimes young American students would

19:13

say, I'm Canadian, not American, so

19:15

that in the idea that Canada

19:17

is nice, America is not. Yeah, which

19:19

is a big myth. Well, I mean,

19:22

I got dis- I believed that as,

19:24

you know, well, well, well into my

19:26

20s. And the first time I ever

19:29

played in Belgrade, in Serbia, like, which

19:31

is one of my favorite places to

19:33

play music and visit, I have a

19:35

lot of friends there. But the first

19:38

time I played there, after the

19:40

show, I was at a bar,

19:42

and some guy asked me where

19:44

I was from, and I proudly

19:47

said, I'm not American, I'm from

19:49

Canada. Yelling about the data about

19:51

the data bombings, right? Of which

19:54

Canada took part. We also took

19:56

part in operations in Bosnia, you

19:59

know? Right. So he just screamed

20:01

at me about NATO. And how

20:03

Canada was a bullshit country and

20:05

a puppet of the United States.

20:07

And I was just like, well,

20:09

I guess he's right. Yeah, no,

20:11

that's true. Is that something that

20:13

was more true in the post-Cold

20:15

War era than the Cold War,

20:17

let's say pre-Molroni era? Wasn't it

20:20

a bit different? At least, or

20:22

no? I think it was different.

20:24

I mean, we had a slightly

20:26

different foreign foreign policy. than America,

20:28

but I think after the Cold

20:30

War, we really got into lockstep

20:32

with the United States, with the

20:34

exception of, you know, Kretchen being

20:37

against Iraq War I. I think

20:39

we were really, we really got

20:41

into, yeah, we got into line with

20:43

American foreign policy, which is one

20:45

of the huge, which has created

20:47

this domino effect where basically

20:50

we don't have any fucking

20:52

friends outside of the US.

20:54

We have completely alienated ourselves

20:56

from any other geopolitical... friendship

20:59

option alliance and you know

21:01

so that's one strain of

21:03

nationalism the other strain is

21:06

incredibly pathetic and you know we

21:08

and and is now in crisis

21:10

but we we cover this a

21:12

lot on bottom which is that

21:15

sort of conservative movement

21:17

which which was which was

21:19

which is like I want

21:22

you guys to picture a

21:24

rebel flag where the stars

21:27

are replaced with maple. And

21:29

that is a thing that

21:32

actually exists. There's a whole

21:34

movement of mostly younger some

21:37

sort of baby boomer Canadians

21:39

that that emerged during

21:41

the pandemic really got

21:44

really got traction during

21:47

the pandemic. And it

21:49

is a it is taking

21:52

American for lack of a

21:54

better word. So like they're

21:56

transposing American sort of identity

21:58

politics from the right, all

22:00

the things that they're worried about,

22:03

they're transposing that onto Canadian culture

22:05

and their experience as Canadians. And

22:07

it gets a friend. And now

22:09

that's in crisis because the country

22:12

that they love and that they

22:14

want to ambulate is threatening to

22:16

invade. Well, can we talk briefly

22:18

about the poll from late last

22:21

year after when at least here

22:23

people still thought it was kind

22:25

of a joke? So this, it was sometime

22:27

late last year, the poll on. whether

22:30

Canadians would basically welcome a

22:32

takeover by the US. And

22:34

14% of Canadians said yes.

22:37

I just love that. That

22:39

just is so funny. And,

22:42

you know, we've mused here

22:44

at Radio Warner that

22:46

it's not as shocking when

22:48

you think about how

22:50

much ambient spite there is.

22:53

I mean, certainly in this

22:55

country. and how a lot of

22:58

people, let's say like when Biden

23:00

was in power, when Clinton was

23:02

in power, they wouldn't have

23:04

minded if, you know, somebody else

23:07

would come in and make their

23:09

neighbor's life hell. Well, yeah, I

23:11

mean, I think in, sorry, and

23:13

I don't mean to presume Dan

23:15

to tell you what's what, but

23:17

I just have this impression and

23:20

you tell me if I'm wrong,

23:22

that is particularly

23:24

intense in the, the triangle

23:26

of Ontario below the lakes

23:28

that yes that there is a

23:31

fact that a choice to

23:33

be made like you're either with

23:35

Margaret Atwood or you're with

23:37

the people who hate her beyond

23:40

all reason like the Ford

23:42

brothers correct that's why Ford is

23:44

so popular there is because

23:46

he's the closest he's the closest

23:48

thing that we can get

23:50

to a Trump type figure, you

23:53

know, without breaking sort of

23:55

these unspoken social norms in

23:57

Canada. So you had this. I

24:00

think it was on chapel, I

24:02

heard you talking, you had this

24:04

great analysis. I guess

24:06

this actually goes back to

24:08

the bottom then again, but

24:10

about oaths and oaths, seeers.

24:12

Could you describe how sort

24:15

of the political economy

24:17

of oathism works in

24:19

Canada? Well, yeah, absolutely. I

24:21

mean, The Ford brothers are

24:24

a great example of that

24:26

paradigm being smashed. That is

24:29

not something that is supposed

24:31

to happen. The oves, the

24:33

oves are not supposed to

24:36

be in charge. But oaths

24:38

and oath overseers, you've got,

24:40

you've got people like my

24:43

family who were like the

24:45

most annoying Lutherans in Germany.

24:47

Bavaria, to Prussia, to

24:49

eventually, the, you know, colony

24:51

of Utland, close to the

24:54

Danish border, and then eventually

24:56

we're just kicked out because

24:58

they're too fucking obnoxious. So

25:00

you have those people and

25:02

they're, I mean, my, my

25:04

ancestors are oaths. They, you

25:06

know, tilled the land basically.

25:08

And then you have the

25:10

old... That's a strange. The

25:12

Lutherans I knew in my suburb

25:14

were among Christians, the least...

25:16

I don't know the most

25:19

non-denominational or something like

25:21

the least annoying I guess

25:23

you'd say so but I

25:26

don't so that but there

25:28

were obviously Martin Luther was

25:31

Very annoying. Yeah. I mean,

25:33

being, being, being pacifists and,

25:35

you know, not enjoying any

25:38

kind of revelry whatsoever, almost

25:40

like a Lutheran Wahhabism. Like,

25:42

so you've got, so you've

25:45

got those people and you've

25:47

got various oaths from, you

25:49

know, Ireland, Scotland,

25:52

UK. But then you also

25:54

have the ice chewing. Protestant

25:56

oath overseers who are like the

25:59

Scots-Irish shoot. move over. And their

26:01

job is to, I mean, many of

26:03

our prime ministers have been

26:05

an oath overseers. Their job is

26:08

to wrangle the oves and get

26:10

the oves to work the

26:12

land. The oves job is to

26:15

remove the great bounty of

26:17

natural resources from the

26:19

new world and not. And maybe

26:21

they can get loaded occasionally if

26:23

they do it. You know, if

26:25

they didn't, you know, once every,

26:27

they could have a feast day.

26:29

If they get their quota, if

26:31

they get their quota, then they

26:33

could have a little feast. And

26:35

that's, that's how it's supposed to

26:37

work. It's not supposed to be

26:39

Rob Ford swallowing a bee on

26:41

camera, or, you know. Yeah, I

26:43

mean, the most amazing thing to

26:45

me when I, when I stayed

26:47

in Toronto for some time was

26:50

the number of orange lodges,

26:52

and I don't think anybody

26:54

else saw them. because it's

26:56

probably not openly a feature

26:58

of Canadian political culture

27:01

now. Not anymore. No,

27:03

but they were all over the place.

27:05

Yeah, yeah, I mean that is that

27:07

is kind of at least as far

27:09

as the big dense population

27:12

center around in Ontario, that

27:14

is supposed to be how

27:17

things work. And you know,

27:19

they even applied that to

27:21

Quebec with, you know, you've

27:23

got Catholic French-speaking oaths, and

27:25

that you've got the

27:28

Anglo-Ove overseers. So that is

27:30

basically, you know, my analysis

27:32

of the way Canadian politics

27:34

works. That makes a lot

27:36

of sense, but then there

27:38

must be subdivisions within

27:41

the oaths. I mean, I guess the

27:43

question is, who would be

27:45

the collaborators with the Americans? I

27:47

mean, off the top of my

27:49

head. I would say some

27:51

of the oaths because they

27:54

don't like overseers and the

27:56

overseers, from what I

27:58

can tell, if... Christian free land

28:01

and and you know her crew are any

28:03

indication I mean they're they're throwing

28:05

in with with Europe And and

28:07

in fact what you know I wanted to

28:09

say with the way you described Canadian

28:11

foreign policy as having basically

28:14

ditched its sovereign it's it is a

28:16

strange paradox. It's not just the

28:18

Canadians they did the same thing

28:20

the Europeans did and it's very

28:22

paradoxical because you would have

28:24

thought it would gone the other way But

28:26

the end of the Cold War,

28:29

they all completely ditched their

28:31

sovereignty and just lined up

28:33

with the US and kind of

28:35

outsourced the whole, you know, all

28:37

foreign policy and sovereignty to the

28:40

US as like this sort of

28:42

benign, you know, benign hand that

28:44

guides the market and guides

28:47

the world. And then they've

28:49

completely atrophied, even any

28:51

sense or any possibility

28:53

of sovereignty. Because it's

28:56

gone on for decades now.

28:58

Well, and it's created some

29:00

incredible contradictions and now some

29:02

huge problems with the US

29:04

being belligerent towards Canada, which

29:06

is our, you know, our

29:08

hope to sort of partner

29:10

with other powerful nations. China

29:12

is gone. And a lot

29:14

of that has been the work

29:16

of, you know, like quote unquote journalists

29:18

in Canada. There has been

29:21

a 15-year campaign to terrify.

29:23

mostly people in my dad's

29:25

generation, but you know, basically everybody

29:28

into thinking that China is in

29:30

our, you know, they're spying on

29:32

us, they're disrupting our democracy,

29:35

they're treating us very unfairly,

29:37

we need to go to

29:39

war with them, and that

29:42

is completely coming from the

29:44

United States to the point

29:46

where, you know, John Bolton

29:49

convinced the Canadian government to

29:51

detain a Huawei executive. That's

29:53

an interesting question in itself.

29:56

If we pursue this fantasy

29:58

scenario. Like, where would

30:01

the more recent immigrants,

30:03

especially the two

30:05

biggest Asian immigrant groups,

30:07

the Indian and the Chinese,

30:09

where would they lie on this

30:11

group? I suspect they

30:14

wouldn't be particularly

30:16

collaborationist or would just try

30:18

to hunker down and survive,

30:20

but I mean, I think

30:22

when I think back to Surrey

30:25

where we lived for a

30:27

while we lived for a

30:29

while we lived for a

30:31

Surrey and BC. The population

30:34

was basically one-third Indian, one-third

30:37

Chinese, and one-third,

30:39

basically Canadian white. And

30:41

I have to say

30:43

that Canadian whites were sort

30:46

of the ne'er-do-wells of the

30:48

population. I mean, they were

30:50

mostly riding around on bikes

30:53

because they'd lost their lives.

30:55

I'm very familiar with the

30:57

with Surrey and that is

31:00

an accurate description. Yeah. I

31:02

mean, I lived in Vancouver

31:04

for a long time and

31:06

and Surrey was a place

31:08

of, you know, it's kind

31:11

of like, kind of like

31:13

New Jersey to New York.

31:15

and non-complimentary. Yeah, that's funny.

31:17

So I guess getting back

31:20

to the question though,

31:22

who would collaborate, do you

31:24

think? I think, you know,

31:27

I think in the oath in

31:29

the oath class, I think that

31:31

actually This goes beyond, this is

31:33

maybe upwardly mobile oves, like people,

31:36

I'm thinking more of my home

31:38

province, like British Columbia. Some of

31:41

the oves have climbed the social

31:43

ladder, they're no longer, you know,

31:45

relegated to like chasing mules around

31:48

or whatever, and they own like

31:50

car dealerships or boat dealerships, or

31:52

they are mom and pop landlords.

31:55

And those people, if you look

31:57

at kind of any of the Canada

31:59

strong... Facebook pages or you

32:01

know any of the comments

32:04

on on some of

32:06

the more like American-style

32:08

right-wing Canadian Twitter those

32:10

guys would be first in

32:12

line to turn against their own

32:14

people absolutely there

32:17

yeah what's the big auto

32:19

shop that's popular in Canada

32:21

it's all over and they

32:23

they have their own bucks

32:25

they have their own currency.

32:27

Oh, you're talking about Canadian

32:30

tire. Yeah, Canadian tire. I

32:32

would focus on the Canadian

32:34

tire demographic. Yeah, exactly. You'd

32:36

have people setting up their

32:38

own fiefdoms trying to trade

32:40

Canadian tire bucks for US

32:42

greenbacks. And then on the

32:45

over-to-seater side, I think you, and

32:47

we've touched on this a little

32:49

bit, you can't trust the academic

32:51

class or, you know, establishment journalists.

32:53

I think there are at

32:55

least a handful of people

32:57

I can think of off

32:59

the top of my head

33:01

who would just be like,

33:04

we welcome our new American

33:06

overlords. Absolutely. Yeah. Can

33:08

you name names? Yeah. I mean,

33:10

I think people like Terry

33:12

Glavin or Andrew Coyne or

33:14

some of the more ultra-right,

33:16

you know, people like Sam

33:18

Cooper, for instance, Cooper is

33:20

really interesting. He, he's... He

33:22

wrote a book about what

33:24

he alleges is Chinese government

33:26

influence in British Columbia's economy

33:28

and politics. He was writing

33:30

some articles for the Globe

33:33

and Mail and the National

33:35

Post for a while and

33:37

he was eventually let go,

33:39

but not before he managed

33:41

to not so credibly accuse a

33:44

couple liberal MPs of being

33:46

puppets for the Chinese Communist

33:48

Party. The newspaper let him go.

33:50

He has a sub stack now

33:53

and it's an interesting arc. He

33:55

used to be taken seriously

33:57

as a Canadian journalist by liberal.

34:00

And now he is like as of

34:02

two days ago appearing on

34:04

Laura Loomer's podcast talking about

34:06

how Canada is the CCP is

34:09

using Canada to import fentanyl

34:11

into the United States.

34:13

So he's essentially already

34:15

a turncoat. And like

34:17

and it's it's crazy

34:19

to me because like he tweeted

34:21

out I think just yesterday

34:24

he said you know i get

34:26

all of my information from high-level

34:28

sources in american finance and you

34:30

know like basically i have all

34:32

these american contacts that's right

34:35

he never accuses anybody and why

34:37

is any a billionaire if he

34:40

has these inside sources should be

34:42

rich as hell exactly but also

34:44

he's just basically saying i am

34:47

a u. u. u.s. foreign influenza

34:49

yeah right output is terrifying Canadians

34:52

about China, saying that China is

34:54

doing a foreign interest. Yeah, it's

34:56

truly bizarre that there's this

34:59

unquestioned double standard, like

35:01

every ounce of Chinese influence,

35:03

in spite of the fact

35:06

that they're a gigantic trading

35:08

partner directly across the ocean

35:10

from BC, is suspect, whereas...

35:13

American influence is taken

35:15

for granted and even seems

35:17

reassuring because they speak the

35:19

same language and they look

35:21

roughly the same. Yeah. Well, it

35:24

was the same during the

35:26

Trucker convoy protest. The original,

35:28

you know, the original finger,

35:30

the big finger was pointed

35:32

originally at Russia, because, you

35:34

know, the government was essentially

35:36

like, okay, these poor misguided

35:39

oves are... have been hoodwinked

35:41

by Russian disinformation campaign. Sorcery.

35:43

Yeah, yeah. You got hypnotized.

35:45

Internet sorcery. And then as

35:47

you kind of dig into

35:50

the funding of these various

35:52

organizations, it's all American

35:54

conservative dollars. But we don't

35:57

talk about that. We can't talk about

35:59

that. Right. Well, how did the,

36:01

when did the anti, like

36:03

the China paranoia start, I

36:05

mean, it sounds like it's

36:07

worse in Canada, considerably worse.

36:09

You've sent me stuff over

36:11

the years like these, you

36:14

know, China, like China smearing

36:16

campaigns that are a lot

36:18

like Russia Gates smearing campaigns

36:20

here that I'm going on

36:22

in politics and so on.

36:24

started in 2016 with the

36:26

election of the Liberal Party,

36:28

which is really funny. I

36:30

mean, it's really funny because

36:32

a lot of conservatives now

36:34

consider the Canadian Liberal Party

36:36

like Patsy's and basically a

36:38

sort of sleeper cell of

36:40

Chinese communists. Like they will

36:42

straight up call Justin Trudeau

36:45

a communist and, you know,

36:47

say he's in league with

36:49

the Chinese Communist Party. Trudeau

36:51

and the liberals ran on

36:53

smearing other people or ran

36:55

on whipping up China fear

36:57

in 2016? I think they

36:59

ran, they inherited an environment

37:01

of paranoia and fear about

37:03

China and China is a

37:05

perfect scapegoat for why things

37:07

don't feel good in Canada.

37:09

Why is the housing crisis?

37:11

you know, why do we

37:14

have a housing crisis in

37:16

Canada? It's foreign investment. It's

37:18

not these massive real estate

37:20

investment trusts. It's not these

37:22

American real estate investment trusts.

37:24

And it's not just unchecked,

37:26

unregulated greed. It's the nefarious

37:28

Chinese. I mean, I would

37:30

add a really interesting example

37:32

of this, which is, Kirsty

37:34

Nome governs one of the

37:36

Dakotas, I think South Dakota.

37:38

Yeah, and she was photographed

37:40

in the hangar of an

37:42

Air Force base in South

37:45

Dakota standing next to an

37:47

American fighter jet, I think

37:49

it was in F16, but

37:51

I'm not sure, and making

37:53

a speech introducing a bill

37:55

to forbid foreign ownership of

37:57

farmland in South Dakota, like

37:59

the Chinese are desperately trying.

38:01

to get some snowbound farmland

38:03

in South Dakota. And she,

38:05

I mean, there's only like

38:07

a third of a million

38:09

aged voters in South Dakota

38:11

anyway. And they're all apparently

38:14

up in arms now about

38:16

the Chinese buying all their

38:18

farmland as if. The government

38:20

of South Dakota couldn't easily

38:22

just say, no, you're at

38:24

war with us now, we're

38:26

taking our farmland back. They

38:28

have this idea that it'll

38:30

be insidiously bought, whereas, you

38:32

know, Bill Gates can buy,

38:34

God knows how many hundreds

38:36

of thousands of acres, and

38:38

that's okay. That's okay. That's

38:40

fine. Yeah. I mean, it's

38:42

manning to think about, because

38:45

I'm old enough to remember

38:47

when the conservatives were in

38:49

power, when Harper was in

38:51

power, there were a lot

38:53

of deals being made with

38:55

China around mineral exports and

38:57

oil exports. That was when

38:59

Fort McMurray was going strong,

39:01

the tar sands were going

39:03

strong, and this doesn't get

39:05

mentioned a lot, but Canada,

39:07

specifically Vancouver, is the only

39:09

North American belt and road

39:11

project point. Like there is

39:14

a small Belton Road initiative

39:16

project in the South Delta

39:18

that is a warehouse, you

39:20

know, that got set up,

39:22

I think, during Harper. But

39:24

it's a bizarre world. So

39:26

the conservatives are blaming the

39:28

liberal party for handing the

39:30

country over to the Chinese

39:32

when their, you know, fearless

39:34

leader, Harper was making deals

39:36

with the Chinese government during

39:38

his entire tenure. So, I

39:40

don't know. As with here

39:42

it. It's been a completely

39:45

bipartisan affair and it's been

39:47

because it helped the rich

39:49

get richer and was good

39:51

for business. But the anxiety

39:53

is obviously, the anxiety goes

39:55

to, in this country as

39:57

well, it goes to the

39:59

top of the ruling classes

40:01

that America is fading and

40:03

you know, and China is

40:05

rising and that so they

40:07

manifest it through this like.

40:09

cheap fake xenophobic populism. I

40:11

don't know to divert or

40:14

something. But I do think,

40:16

yeah, go ahead, John. No,

40:18

I was just wondering, when

40:20

I was growing up, mostly

40:22

because of demographic reasons, I

40:24

mean, the demographics of Quebec

40:26

were astonishing and they have

40:28

now completely reversed. It went

40:30

from like the highest birth

40:32

rate in the world to

40:34

one of the lowest ones

40:36

people got. free of, you

40:38

know, well, okay, I'll say

40:40

a church domination and, uh,

40:42

but, so, so they're not

40:45

as important demographically anymore, but

40:47

do they have any role

40:49

in this? What of the

40:51

Quebec War parties said about

40:53

this? I mean, my personal

40:55

opinion is if the United

40:57

States invades Canada, the Quebec

40:59

will become the Vietnam, like,

41:01

they will. I think. They're

41:03

all ready, they already feel,

41:05

I mean, I live in

41:07

Montreal for over 20 years,

41:09

they already feel im battled

41:11

culturally at the sort of

41:14

higher echelones of government, sometimes

41:16

to a degree where they're,

41:18

you know, sort of boomeranging

41:20

back into like borderline fascism

41:22

with like language police. language

41:24

police auditing slack channels of

41:26

small business to make sure

41:28

that the correct amount of

41:30

Quebec was being spoken like

41:32

that's the environment that is

41:34

the environment and I honestly

41:36

don't think the Quebec would

41:38

put up with it. for

41:40

one, I think they would

41:42

be the fucking vanguard flight.

41:45

Yeah, so that, I wrote

41:47

a short story when I

41:49

was like 10, a nerdy,

41:51

you know, war nerdy, a

41:53

short story about World War

41:55

III. And in it, of

41:57

course, we had to take

41:59

Canada, like all 10-year-old thing,

42:01

because it enlarges the map

42:03

and makes us closer to

42:05

even with the USSR. But

42:07

in my story, we let

42:09

Quebec go, for, you know,

42:11

kind of for that reason.

42:14

And so Quebec kind of,

42:16

it was not allowed to

42:18

align with the evil comedies,

42:20

but it was allowed to

42:22

be sovereign. I wonder if

42:24

what the nerdoids in Trump's

42:26

administration, if they're thinking along

42:28

those lines too. I mean,

42:30

that makes a lot of

42:32

sense, you know. I bet

42:34

they don't even think about

42:36

Quebec. I kind of feel

42:38

like they've forgotten about Quebec,

42:40

and it would be extra

42:42

surprising for them to see

42:45

a guy with a St.

42:47

Hubert bandana, you know, like,

42:49

and an explosive vest coming

42:51

towards their armored column. So

42:53

let's, let's pull the camera

42:55

back a little bit here.

42:57

I'm going to read you

42:59

something here. This is the

43:01

New York Times editorial. The

43:03

headline is, Allies start planning

43:05

a life without America. And

43:07

it says, many governments must

43:09

be thinking along the same

43:11

lines, but few have spelled

43:14

it out so clearly. There's

43:16

from Germany, the times in

43:18

which we could rely fully

43:20

on others. They are somewhat

43:22

over. Now Canada, a country

43:24

tightly bound to its neighbor

43:26

by history, alliance, and the

43:28

longest border in the world,

43:30

has declared the need to

43:32

recognize that the United States

43:34

is relinquishing its role as

43:36

the indispensable nation. And here's

43:38

what the Canada's foreign minister

43:40

says. The fact that our

43:42

friend and ally has come

43:45

to question the very worth

43:47

of its mantle of global

43:49

leadership puts into sharper focus

43:51

the need for the rest

43:53

of us to set our

43:55

own clear and sovereign course.

43:57

Maybe you guys have the

43:59

notes here. This is an

44:01

editorial, not from today, yesterday,

44:03

the day before. This is

44:05

from June 2017. So supposedly,

44:07

everything was going to change

44:09

then in 2017. And the

44:11

foreign minister, Christian Freeland, laid

44:14

out. in sharper detail, how

44:16

they were going to have

44:18

to be more sovereign, they

44:20

were going to increase their

44:22

defense budgets, the Europeans were

44:24

talking about, they were going

44:26

to have to learn to

44:28

live without the United States,

44:30

they were going to have

44:32

to increase their defense budgets.

44:34

And as far as I

44:36

know, in that period since

44:38

then, between 2017 and now,

44:40

Canada actually did increase its,

44:42

it's pretty small, actually surprisingly

44:45

small defense budget. But it

44:47

increased it from something like

44:49

1.1 something or 1.2% of

44:51

GDP to where it is

44:53

now 1.4% of GDP. Yeah,

44:55

and the idea is that

44:57

we're going to get to

44:59

2%. That's the both parties,

45:01

both the conservatives and liberals,

45:03

have promised that we will

45:05

increase defense funding to, or

45:07

spending to 2%. Right, but

45:09

that's been almost 10 years

45:11

since this giant shift supposedly

45:14

has happened. And so now

45:16

we get to, here's a

45:18

New York Times article from

45:20

just a few days ago,

45:22

how Trump supercharged distrust driving

45:24

U.S. allies away. And so

45:26

the article basically lays out

45:28

how Trump is causing permanent

45:30

distrust damage. between the US

45:32

and its allies. And one

45:34

of the first items it

45:36

points to is proof that

45:38

this is happening is that

45:40

the Canadian military has agreed

45:42

to purchase a $4.2 billion

45:45

radar system from Australia. So

45:47

with the implication being that

45:49

they would have bought it

45:51

from us, from the US,

45:53

but Trump has scared them

45:55

so much that now they're

45:57

buying it from Australia. But

45:59

then nine paragraphs down, we

46:01

learned that the radar is

46:03

actually to be deployed as

46:05

part of Norad, which is the

46:08

North American Defense Committee, basically,

46:10

the radar agreement that Canada and

46:12

the US have been running since

46:14

what, the 1950s, you know, to

46:16

defend the skies over the two

46:18

countries. And then another. a few

46:21

paragraphs down. It says the

46:23

decision to opt for Australia

46:25

as a provider for the

46:27

advanced radar technology was supported

46:30

by the U.S. military. So

46:32

there was actually nothing there.

46:34

And so then the question becomes,

46:36

then I think it talked about

46:38

the F-35s, right? So the Karni,

46:40

the new prime minister said he

46:43

was... At least it was reported

46:45

that he was going to cancel

46:47

this big purchase of the flightless

46:49

F-35s. And the reason that it

46:51

was going to be canceled, they

46:53

said, is that Trump said he

46:55

would not let, that he wouldn't

46:57

sell icebreakers to Canada unless

47:00

Canada became the 51 state. Then

47:02

we found out Trump never said

47:04

that he wouldn't sell them to

47:06

Canada. He just said. if they're

47:08

American icebreakers and Canada wants

47:10

to use them, they can't

47:13

have them unless they become, unless

47:15

they join America as a state,

47:17

which is, which, you know, which

47:19

is like annoying, but makes actually

47:21

a little bit more sense. Like, if

47:23

you said he wouldn't sell them an

47:26

ice breaker, that would be a lot

47:28

more hostile, I would think, than saying,

47:30

you know, you can't. So everything

47:32

kind of when you scratch the surface

47:34

doesn't quite pan out the same way.

47:36

And is the F35. Even canceled and

47:38

should anybody want it, but I

47:41

don't think I don't think it's

47:43

canceled I mean that's that is

47:45

for me personally like the crux

47:47

of like the hypocrisy of Sort

47:49

of the Canada strong movement is

47:51

like if we were actually serious

47:53

We would not be spending I mean

47:56

this is really depressing, but we're

47:58

spending between three and five million

48:00

dollars on Hymur's platform.

48:03

Billion. Billion, billion, billion,

48:05

billion dollars on Hymur's, which,

48:07

you know, Mark and I,

48:09

we talked about this, but, you know,

48:12

Hymur's are, unless I'm totally wrong,

48:14

like Hymur's have kind of

48:16

been defamed by their deployment

48:19

in Ukraine and the Russians

48:21

sort of analyzing how this weapons

48:23

platform works and how to

48:25

fucking knock it out. So.

48:27

you know if if high

48:29

Mars aren't good enough for

48:31

Ukraine and Canada is buying

48:33

billions and billions of them we're

48:36

not a sovereign nation well not

48:38

only that we know from all

48:40

the reporting that the high Mars

48:42

require American intelligence but

48:45

the whole apparatus of

48:47

intelligence satellites everything to

48:49

operate and software like

48:51

well yeah that's that's

48:53

the key thing like the

48:55

only reason I know this

48:58

is About 10 years ago,

49:00

I was in communication with

49:03

someone in the

49:05

US establishment that

49:07

we both know

49:09

Mark. And he

49:11

was recently back

49:13

from a triumphant

49:15

trip to a

49:17

state that borders

49:19

the Soviet Union.

49:22

And his triumph

49:24

was that. He and

49:26

an American team

49:28

had managed to

49:30

persuade the government

49:32

of that country

49:35

to specialize its

49:37

military, that is

49:39

to reconfigure its

49:42

military from

49:44

a sort of

49:46

all-purpose defense force

49:48

into a specifically,

49:51

I think it was mine

49:53

defusing force.

49:55

because that would

49:57

serve the interests

50:00

the greater alliance,

50:02

the NATO adjacent

50:04

alliance. The problem with

50:06

that is if the

50:08

heart of NATO, which

50:10

is basically the US

50:13

military, suddenly drops

50:15

out of NATO, you've

50:18

got this weird little

50:20

military force

50:22

that's entirely devoted

50:25

to mind diffusing.

50:27

and is incapable

50:29

of defending your country.

50:31

So that basically means

50:33

you don't have a military.

50:35

That's very interesting,

50:37

like in the context of

50:40

Canada, John, because like, you

50:42

know, okay, I was looking

50:44

at recent military purchases from

50:46

the United States by Canada,

50:49

and we've got High Mars.

50:51

We have billions of dollars

50:53

of... And you know, I'm not as

50:55

much of a war nerd as you

50:57

guys, but a wax, is that right?

51:00

Like, like radar, radar plans.

51:02

Yeah. This contentious

51:04

thing around ice breakers, a

51:07

huge procurement for drones,

51:09

American made drones, and

51:11

then the, and then

51:13

the weak, sort of

51:15

weak attempt. to pull ourselves

51:18

away from the American

51:21

orbit is entertaining a

51:23

South Korean offer for

51:25

submarines that the

51:27

Polish Navy rejected.

51:30

Wow. Yeah, it's a KSS3

51:32

submarine, which was proposed

51:34

to the Polish Navy

51:36

in 2023 and they rejected

51:39

it. So yeah, that's it.

51:41

And we're talking like... Six

51:43

submarines, 11 submarines. I mean,

51:46

come on. Yeah. Yeah, I

51:48

mean, presumably what the American

51:51

military would want. And whenever

51:53

there are these political dust-ups,

51:55

there's a lot of quiet

51:58

cooperation behind the scenes. between

52:00

the militaries, except in a

52:02

few cases when there's a

52:04

real break. But what they

52:07

would want above all is

52:09

surveillance of the far north

52:11

and northwest. And so everything

52:13

they've got is configured toward

52:15

that. And it's configured to

52:17

trigger a response by the

52:19

American military no matter what

52:21

the political noises no matter

52:23

what the political noises I

52:26

think actually I left who

52:28

would be a turncoat and

52:30

were a big one, which

52:32

is the Canadian military and

52:34

our intelligence services. That's right.

52:36

Yeah. Like they've been training

52:38

with the US military. Yeah,

52:40

they speak the same language.

52:42

Yeah. Yeah, and oftentimes, you

52:45

know, like, there was a,

52:47

there was a big scandal

52:49

in Eastern Canada, like back

52:51

right before COVID, where the

52:53

Canadian military was doing sciops

52:55

research by putting up, putting

52:57

up flyers saying that there

52:59

was a pack of wolves

53:01

running around. And they said,

53:04

a literal pack of wolves,

53:06

that they got busted doing

53:08

it and tried to blame.

53:10

the russians of course and

53:12

then oh my gosh and

53:14

then we're like the wolves

53:16

alone I know no and

53:18

they're they trying to gauge

53:20

like like how much we

53:23

can so panic and how

53:25

panic travels or like they

53:27

were they claim they were

53:29

trying to gauge Canadian oath

53:31

response to this information And

53:33

then of course you'd, you

53:35

know, oh, just blame it

53:37

on the Russians, because they're

53:39

their ones who do the

53:41

disinformation. Yeah, I think the

53:44

Canadian military ensees the intelligence

53:46

apparatus are, you know, basically

53:48

unchecked and like John said,

53:50

have been training with people

53:52

in the United States, training

53:54

with the U.S. military. I

53:56

don't feel like they're particularly

53:58

loyal to Canada. know ideologically

54:00

speaking which is troublesome you

54:03

know yeah I guess specially

54:05

yeah special forces type of

54:07

yeah yeah I'm not sure

54:09

the American military at some

54:11

levels is all that loyal

54:13

to the American idea as

54:15

as some would conceive it

54:17

I mean they're loyal to

54:19

a certain idea of America

54:22

but It's not the one

54:24

that the New York Times

54:26

exemplifies. Yeah. So maybe transnational

54:28

military coup, you know. Yeah.

54:30

I was just looking at

54:32

Canada in the second, you

54:34

know, Bush's invasion of Iraq

54:36

in 2003. And I mean,

54:38

I think you already mentioned

54:41

it, but, um, how do

54:43

you say his name? Chertian

54:45

or... the Prime Minister wouldn't.

54:47

He was, he so desperately,

54:49

it seems like, wanted to

54:51

have some minimal rationale to

54:53

be able to support the

54:55

US, but ultimately couldn't. So

54:57

he kind of took a

55:00

passive aggressive way out of

55:02

supporting the initial invasion and

55:04

then backed it up. But

55:06

the thing that kind of

55:08

blew me away is, Canada

55:10

returned Iraq war resistors. I

55:12

mean, there weren't many, there

55:14

were a few who fled.

55:16

who deserted basically, deserted the

55:19

military, the American military, so

55:21

as not to serve in

55:23

Iraq, went to Canada and

55:25

Canada eventually sent them back.

55:27

Yeah, yeah, I mean there

55:29

was, I don't think there's

55:31

been a war in Canada

55:33

since, I think the only

55:35

war in Canada that was

55:38

deeply unpopular in the press

55:40

besides Vietnam was Iraq War

55:42

One, but this is going

55:44

back to the boar war

55:46

war. You know, I remember

55:48

Riley and I with Bottelman,

55:50

we started going through Canadian

55:52

newspapers to train. part, Parsa,

55:54

which war Canada didn't support

55:56

because, you know, like we

55:59

said at the beginning of

56:01

the show, a lot of

56:03

Canadian nationalism sort of rests

56:05

on its opposition to being

56:07

American, you know, but there's

56:09

functionally no difference in at

56:11

least the media's support of

56:13

almost every single war. Oh,

56:15

wait, so there was a

56:18

lot of opposition to the

56:20

Boer War in Canada, was

56:22

there? No, no, zero opposition

56:24

in the press. That's what

56:26

I would thought, yeah, because

56:28

they were more... more imperial

56:30

than Britain as far as

56:32

I know. Yeah, and they

56:34

managed to recruit a lot

56:37

of Canadians through the Canadian

56:39

press, you know. It was

56:41

just like, do your diligence

56:43

for queen and country, you

56:45

know, go fight. Go fight

56:47

now. How do the Canadians

56:49

remember World War I? They

56:51

remember it as a glorious

56:53

victory. Like that is maybe

56:56

our grandest military memory. Vim

56:58

Vimy Ridge. Vimy. Yeah. Yeah.

57:00

So Remembrance Day is a

57:02

big thing in Canada and

57:04

every year, every November, there's

57:06

people voloviating about poppies. You

57:08

know, so and so isn't

57:10

wearing the poppy. They're not

57:12

a patriot. They don't remember

57:15

Vimy Ridge. So what's that

57:17

there's another remembrance day. I

57:19

remember. remembering something day. We

57:21

remember the victims of the

57:23

Holocaust and of Stalin's crimes.

57:25

And I remember this in

57:27

honor of my grandfather, the

57:29

great Michaela Jomiac. She actually

57:31

put her Nazi collaborator grandfather

57:34

in the tweet, which was

57:36

amazing. So that's that's actually

57:38

pretty interesting. So that is

57:40

a fake holiday, um, cooked

57:42

up, cooked up by an

57:44

Estonian guy named Marcus Hess,

57:46

who, uh, Hess. Yes. And

57:48

he, he basically helped shape

57:50

the double genocide theory. or

57:53

popularize it at least, the

57:55

double genocide theory being a

57:57

sort of Holocaust revisionist theory

57:59

set forth by Nazi collaborators

58:01

who had decamped to North

58:03

America and South America, which

58:05

said, okay, six million, yeah,

58:07

sure, but also. But also

58:09

the other guys were just

58:12

as bad if not worse.

58:14

If not worse, the implication

58:16

is always that they were

58:18

worse, but they were worse.

58:20

White crossed that line. And

58:22

then Black Ribbon Day was

58:24

set up by Hess and

58:26

a few people in something

58:28

called the Canadian Taxpayers Alliance,

58:30

which is exactly what you

58:33

think it is. It's a

58:35

libertarian, you know, right wing

58:37

think tank that was based

58:39

on, you know, like bringing

58:41

a libertarian candidate to the

58:43

four. So this, so this,

58:45

uh, has went on a

58:47

whirlwind tour of Europe to

58:49

promote, you know, this double

58:52

genocide theory and met with

58:54

Slavistsko who is, you know,

58:56

I'm sure radio word nerd

58:58

listeners will know who that

59:00

is. And, you're, right, you

59:02

know, Slavszko, right? Yeah, yeah,

59:04

his wife, and met at,

59:06

you know, the anti-Bolshevik League

59:08

of Nations Headquarters in Munich,

59:11

Let's go, by the way,

59:13

was appointed head of the,

59:15

briefly, the head of the

59:17

puppet, the Nazi puppet regime

59:19

in Ukraine, when they took

59:21

over LaVillev. Yeah. All you

59:23

need to know about Black

59:25

Room and Day is that

59:27

there is a wonderful photo

59:30

of the architect of it,

59:32

Marcus Hess, and Slavist Letz

59:34

go in front of a

59:36

statue of Roman Shukievich, the

59:38

leader of the nautical battalion

59:40

at the ABN headquarters in

59:42

Munich. as they discussed their

59:44

plans to create this fake-ass

59:46

holiday. So yeah, that's our

59:49

other remembrance day. So I

59:51

mean, that explains why Timothy

59:53

Snyder's finding such a warm

59:55

reception there because Snyder's book,

59:57

I mean, he's probably the

59:59

biggest... popularizer in

1:00:01

this country anyway of double

1:00:03

genocide theory I mean he

1:00:05

kind of he was it's

1:00:08

strange I mean he initially he

1:00:10

did not downplay one side

1:00:12

of the double genocide there

1:00:14

the the sort of Nazi

1:00:16

collaboration aside but eventually as

1:00:19

he as he as time

1:00:21

went on he went on

1:00:23

to massively emphasize you

1:00:25

know basically blame everything

1:00:27

on communism and the

1:00:29

Russians and everything that happened

1:00:31

was their fault and including

1:00:34

the Holocaust that it was

1:00:36

one of those things where you

1:00:38

know it's either Hitler got his

1:00:40

idea from a Palestinian Mufti or

1:00:42

he got it from Stalin or

1:00:44

you know he had no ideas

1:00:46

of his own it's whoever you

1:00:48

don't like. So Dan I have

1:00:50

to ask the the sort of

1:00:53

cheesy cinematic question here like if

1:00:55

if there was a breakdown

1:00:57

of Canada in the event

1:01:00

which I find highly unlikely

1:01:02

of an American invasion, an

1:01:04

actual American invasion. I mean,

1:01:07

we're kind of ham-fisted these

1:01:09

days, but I don't know

1:01:11

if our fists have turned

1:01:14

into literal ham quite

1:01:16

that much. But if there

1:01:18

was, what would you see as

1:01:20

the centers of collaborationists and

1:01:22

the centers of resistance? Okay.

1:01:25

This is great. I think

1:01:27

Quebec definitely the sort of

1:01:30

north would be the would

1:01:32

be the Hanoi of Canada.

1:01:34

I think Quebec City in

1:01:37

Montreal, definitely. I think south

1:01:39

of Toronto. The Sunni

1:01:41

triangle. The Sunni triangle. Yeah,

1:01:43

all the way to Tra

1:01:46

Riviere. And you know, the

1:01:48

north would be the training.

1:01:50

So like I'm thinking about

1:01:52

like Shikoutami, like Northern Quebec.

1:01:54

South of Toronto, I think

1:01:56

the greater Toronto area would

1:01:59

be able... work against, you

1:02:01

know, U.S. invasion, although there

1:02:03

probably be some interesting conflicts

1:02:05

there, but Southern Ontario would

1:02:07

be rife with collaborators, collaborationists,

1:02:09

people, people mining Lake Ontario,

1:02:12

you know, cutting fuel lines.

1:02:14

I think so yeah I

1:02:16

think that I think the

1:02:18

spite towards the liberal the

1:02:20

quote-unquote liberal elite in Toronto

1:02:22

that would make sense you

1:02:25

know like the the France

1:02:27

versus Paris yeah after the

1:02:29

Russians took over yeah I

1:02:31

think the rural urban divides

1:02:33

in the suburban urban divides

1:02:35

would become, I think the

1:02:38

biggest conflicts would be, internally

1:02:40

would be between the suburbs

1:02:42

and the and the metropolitan,

1:02:44

like the city. I think

1:02:46

another big area of collaborationists

1:02:48

are what we were talking

1:02:51

about earlier, which is sadly

1:02:53

British Columbia, the interior, you

1:02:55

know, I mean, we all

1:02:57

know Washington State, Oregon, and

1:02:59

California on the other side

1:03:01

of that mountain range. It's

1:03:04

all, I don't know if

1:03:06

you guys have seen the

1:03:08

movie Green Room, but it's

1:03:10

all Green Room. Yeah, well

1:03:12

yeah, the legislators describe it

1:03:14

as beyond hope, right? Because

1:03:16

hope is a city right

1:03:19

on the edge of coastal

1:03:21

British Columbia, but yeah, things

1:03:23

change after that. Yeah, I

1:03:25

wonder, I'm thinking about this

1:03:27

now a little more, and

1:03:29

I wonder, okay, you'd have

1:03:32

to, if you sent a

1:03:34

fighting force of young Americans

1:03:36

into Canada who were... ostensibly

1:03:38

probably gonna have to shoot

1:03:40

and kill Canadians you would

1:03:42

the American government would have

1:03:45

to find a way to

1:03:47

really dehumanize Canadians you know

1:03:49

yeah to other them and

1:03:51

I'm not I think there

1:03:53

would definitely be there would

1:03:55

definitely be armed resistance on

1:03:58

the American side of the

1:04:00

border oh definitely collaborating with

1:04:02

whatever arm resistance there was

1:04:04

in Canada? I mean, so

1:04:06

Canada, just so we know

1:04:08

what we're talking about here,

1:04:11

Canada has an act of

1:04:13

personnel 68,000, I mean, it's

1:04:15

pretty small, a budget, defense

1:04:17

budget of $27 billion. That

1:04:19

is after the huge, you

1:04:21

know, boost after Christian Freeland.

1:04:24

It's not very big. I

1:04:26

mean, I would, you'd have

1:04:28

to also, yeah, the American

1:04:30

military would have to be

1:04:32

told that there, this is

1:04:34

where like the whole liberal

1:04:36

stuff that Trump is dismantling

1:04:39

the liberal soft power stuff

1:04:41

comes in. comes in real

1:04:43

handy. Like, how do you,

1:04:45

you do have to convince

1:04:47

people to kill people like

1:04:49

you? Yeah. And it's not,

1:04:52

that's not an easy thing.

1:04:54

And usually what you have

1:04:56

to do is say you're

1:04:58

saving them. And even from

1:05:00

the many reports I've read

1:05:02

about Russia's, the full scale

1:05:05

invasion in February 2022, a

1:05:07

lot of the Russian military,

1:05:09

first of all, they weren't

1:05:11

even told, you know, and

1:05:13

then when they did go

1:05:15

in, they thought that they

1:05:18

were going into, you know,

1:05:20

a country of brothers. who

1:05:22

wanted to be freed from

1:05:24

Nazis. And it's liberation. Liberation,

1:05:26

which is standard, right? So

1:05:28

you did have to feed

1:05:31

them a story, and that

1:05:33

sounds like probably too much

1:05:35

work for Trump. Like why,

1:05:37

you know, we're strong. That's

1:05:39

why we're going in. Yeah,

1:05:41

you need to craft an

1:05:44

entire psychological campaign, you know,

1:05:46

on almost every level of

1:05:48

media that reached every class,

1:05:50

you know. reached across cultural

1:05:52

divides even. The quick cookery

1:05:54

method is you construct a

1:05:56

few atrocities or border incidents,

1:05:59

but I think America already

1:06:01

has. an image of Canada,

1:06:03

which is quite unfair, believe

1:06:05

me, as a country of

1:06:07

Ned Flanders. And the reason

1:06:09

I know that's unfair is

1:06:12

that one night when Catherine

1:06:14

and I were sleeping on

1:06:16

the boat, which we had

1:06:18

just moved around to another

1:06:20

inlet, And I didn't know

1:06:22

much about handling boats. Apparently

1:06:25

I had let the anchor

1:06:27

swing too wide and I

1:06:29

had annoyed this messed up

1:06:31

and steroided it up. Oil

1:06:33

rig worker giant fucker. bordered

1:06:35

our boat at about 2

1:06:38

a.m. I got up and

1:06:40

barely made it outside and

1:06:42

went, huh? And he was

1:06:44

like raging already. And he,

1:06:46

I mean, it was as

1:06:48

close as we've ever come

1:06:51

to being killed. And I

1:06:53

think it was only because

1:06:55

I was just so weak

1:06:57

and passive and harmless that

1:06:59

he didn't think we were

1:07:01

worth killing. But he raged

1:07:04

at us. for about 15

1:07:06

minutes and I said, I'm

1:07:08

sorry, a lot of times.

1:07:10

And eventually he's, well, fuck

1:07:12

this. And just got back

1:07:14

his boat. But you know,

1:07:16

that's when I realize there's,

1:07:19

it's not all Ned Flanders

1:07:21

in Canada. Yeah, well you

1:07:23

know how like all like

1:07:25

horrible sex dungeon basement crimes

1:07:27

are usually it's always like

1:07:29

the bannalux countries it's like

1:07:32

Belgium Austria you know I

1:07:34

think I think there is

1:07:36

like a deep repressed darkness

1:07:38

in the Canadian psyche that

1:07:40

can be pushed to the

1:07:42

brink and then we'll get

1:07:45

on your boat and and

1:07:47

try and strangle you at

1:07:49

2 a.m. Can we talk

1:07:51

about Colonel Russell Williams? Speaking

1:07:53

of that, that's one of

1:07:55

the craziest serial killer stories

1:07:58

I've ever heard. I only,

1:08:00

I came across it recently,

1:08:02

you know, looking at some true

1:08:04

crime thing. And was that a big

1:08:06

deal? And can I think maybe, do

1:08:08

you know that story right there? I

1:08:10

don't. I don't know Colonel Russell

1:08:12

Williams. Oh my God. I think

1:08:15

I remember it vaguely, right? He

1:08:17

was, he was killing women while

1:08:19

posing as a perfectly respectable army

1:08:21

officer. Yeah, he was, I want

1:08:23

to say, so he was a

1:08:26

colonel, he was very high up. I want

1:08:28

to say he like. escorted

1:08:30

the Queen when she visited.

1:08:32

And then when he

1:08:34

wasn't escorting the Queen, he

1:08:36

was sneaking into women's

1:08:38

homes, finding out who

1:08:41

lived alone, sneaking in their

1:08:43

homes, stealing their underwear so

1:08:45

he could wear it and

1:08:47

photograph himself and

1:08:50

murdering them. And yeah, you

1:08:52

can actually see his confession

1:08:55

on YouTube. It's a really

1:08:57

weird. Weird as hell very weird

1:08:59

story. I mean very much like what

1:09:01

you're talking about like he was he

1:09:03

was the perfect Canadian You know,

1:09:06

that's how they talked about him like

1:09:08

the perfect Canadian and You know

1:09:10

it turned out to be just a

1:09:12

serial rapist and serial murderer So

1:09:14

maybe you know, maybe that

1:09:17

trait maybe we go berserter

1:09:19

mode Maybe we, maybe everyone

1:09:21

relax their Turner Williams and

1:09:24

just, you know, the Americans

1:09:26

are like, okay, sorry, sorry

1:09:28

about that, everyone like. But

1:09:31

I mean, honestly, I think

1:09:33

a war, a war. Because

1:09:35

you guys could pass easily,

1:09:38

you know. I mean, the

1:09:40

best gorilla strategy might be

1:09:42

head south. I mean, I've been

1:09:45

thinking about this as we've been

1:09:47

talking, and my image, I have

1:09:49

just one image of a war

1:09:51

between America and Canada, and it

1:09:53

is the smoking rubble of downtown

1:09:55

Toronto. A guy named Gord Thompson

1:09:57

climbs the CNN tower with a

1:09:59

single... He has left, shoots

1:10:01

it in an armored column

1:10:03

of American invaders, and then

1:10:06

they just press a button

1:10:08

where it loony tune style

1:10:10

doubles back and vaporizes it.

1:10:12

Oh, that's beautiful because of

1:10:14

course, before they sold it

1:10:17

to the Canadians, they would

1:10:19

have re-engineered it. Yeah. Exactly.

1:10:21

I'm circling back a little

1:10:23

bit to what we talked

1:10:26

about in the beginning. Jason

1:10:28

Stanley and Timothy Snyder going

1:10:30

to Toronto. I just want to say

1:10:32

a couple things about this before we

1:10:35

end the show. First thing is, in

1:10:37

the interview, she asked, you know, she or

1:10:39

he, wherever the interview is, asks him,

1:10:41

what was the tipping point for you?

1:10:44

I just have to read this, this,

1:10:46

since we've mentioned it already,

1:10:48

he says... I don't know the general

1:10:50

answer to that question, but things

1:10:53

are very bad in this country.

1:10:55

It's an authoritarian regime.

1:10:57

People are not responding well.

1:10:59

It's moving faster than it moved

1:11:01

in Russia, and journalists are not

1:11:04

acting in a way that will

1:11:06

get them shot or thrown out

1:11:08

of windows, unfortunately. which is what

1:11:10

is supposed to happen to journalists

1:11:13

under ideal conditions. That's why you

1:11:15

go into journalism. And I go

1:11:17

into Ontario. Yes. Later he says

1:11:20

that was some of his dark

1:11:22

humor like when he uses the

1:11:24

word fuck or something. But you

1:11:26

know he actually means it. There's

1:11:29

so much there to unpack on

1:11:31

top of the fact that... Journalism

1:11:34

barely even exists in America, you

1:11:36

know, and he's like got this

1:11:38

tenure job in an industry where

1:11:40

there's no more tenure anymore and

1:11:43

he thinks it all works like that.

1:11:45

But the thing that really among other

1:11:47

things also that stood out to me

1:11:49

is it's moving faster than it

1:11:51

moved in Russia. Does he, like this

1:11:53

is a scholar from an Ivy League

1:11:56

saying this, does he have no fucking

1:11:58

idea how it moved in Russia? you

1:12:00

work like somebody as somebody

1:12:02

who was literally run out

1:12:04

of the country it's and

1:12:06

I stayed there and I

1:12:08

went back when I got

1:12:10

you know I was actually

1:12:12

charged with editorial crimes and

1:12:14

had and and this was

1:12:16

sent to our office and

1:12:18

I came back from America

1:12:20

I didn't and you know

1:12:23

I didn't want to get

1:12:25

locked up but I also

1:12:27

at least wanted to try

1:12:29

and fight it and you

1:12:31

know be there with my

1:12:33

Russian colleagues and so on

1:12:35

and you know I got

1:12:37

a lawyer and I sort

1:12:39

of felt like yeah it's

1:12:41

I mean actually because I

1:12:43

watch it and I know

1:12:45

how I have a I

1:12:47

don't know but you know

1:12:50

I have a general sense

1:12:52

of the pace of these

1:12:54

things that yeah going back

1:12:56

could have got me in

1:12:58

trouble going back and fighting

1:13:00

it publicly was definitely getting

1:13:02

me in trouble and then

1:13:04

I left when a guy

1:13:06

in said I should be

1:13:08

fucking arrested. So I got

1:13:10

the hell out at that

1:13:12

point. But my point is

1:13:14

like, we are nowhere near

1:13:17

that in this country. Oh,

1:13:19

you know, a white Jewish

1:13:21

Yale tenured American-born professor is,

1:13:23

it's, we're just nowhere near

1:13:25

that. And it was just

1:13:27

like a little whiff of

1:13:29

gunpowder and this fascism fighter

1:13:31

fled. But on top of

1:13:33

that. They fled to, so

1:13:35

now they're hired by something

1:13:37

called the Monk School of

1:13:39

Global Affairs and Public Policy.

1:13:41

The Monk School is named

1:13:44

after Peter Monk. Peter Monk

1:13:46

and his Barrett Gold are

1:13:48

likely responsible for, you know,

1:13:50

unbelievable amounts of ecological devastation

1:13:52

of political corruption of I

1:13:54

mean, I've just looked up

1:13:56

some articles of, you know,

1:13:58

its employees. I mean, what

1:14:00

do they do? They go

1:14:02

into weak states and corrupt

1:14:04

countries and extract gold by

1:14:06

poisoning the place. I have

1:14:08

a small anecdote that I,

1:14:11

you know, as a Canadian,

1:14:13

that I personally experience. I've

1:14:15

been touring in Romania, you

1:14:17

know, like playing in Bucharest

1:14:19

and Cebu and all these

1:14:21

places in Romania for the

1:14:23

last 15, 20 years. And

1:14:25

one of the last times

1:14:27

I went there. My friend

1:14:29

was like, hey, do you

1:14:31

want to go see a

1:14:33

Canadian mining town in the

1:14:35

middle of the Carpetians? I

1:14:38

was like, yes. So Barrett

1:14:40

Gold had partnered with a

1:14:42

company called Rochea, Montana, who

1:14:44

wanted to basically use cyanide

1:14:46

washing, like washing dirt and

1:14:48

gravel with cyanide to extract

1:14:50

gold, just like banned in

1:14:52

most countries. They wanted to

1:14:54

use that to restart this

1:14:56

gold mine in the Carpetians.

1:14:58

The Canadian government had put

1:15:00

pressure on Romania to relax

1:15:02

its environmental protection laws. There

1:15:05

was a big sort of

1:15:07

protest movement against it. We

1:15:09

went to this town, I

1:15:11

saw a small quote unquote

1:15:13

museum dedicated to the art

1:15:15

of gold mining, and then

1:15:17

when we returned to the

1:15:19

car, found it surrounded by

1:15:21

goons. Wow. Yes. So I

1:15:23

was there with two Romanian

1:15:25

friends, and the goons were

1:15:27

basically like, what the fuck

1:15:29

are you guys doing here,

1:15:32

get out. like we don't

1:15:34

belong here leave now so

1:15:36

eventually I have a sort

1:15:38

of less dramatic but telling

1:15:40

anecdote from when Catherine and

1:15:42

I were living in Saudi

1:15:44

Arabia and we had we

1:15:46

had hopes that our Canadian

1:15:48

residency wouldn't be revoked and

1:15:50

we tried to look up

1:15:52

the the code for Canadian

1:15:54

tax filing and we found

1:15:56

that there was this wonderfully

1:15:59

promising exemption that turned out

1:16:01

not to apply to us

1:16:03

it was that anyone who

1:16:05

is directly involved in resource

1:16:07

exploitation or oil pumping does

1:16:09

not have to pay income

1:16:11

taxes for income earned outside

1:16:13

Canada. Correct. It did not

1:16:15

apply to people who were

1:16:17

teaching English, damn it. You

1:16:19

should have started an oil

1:16:21

well, John. Look, look at

1:16:23

that hole in the backyard.

1:16:26

What do you think that

1:16:28

is? I mean, just, you

1:16:30

know, among barracks partners or,

1:16:32

you know, officers or executives

1:16:34

or whatever, shareholders, were Koshogi,

1:16:36

and on Koshogi, the Iran

1:16:38

contra arms dealer dealer. So

1:16:40

basically, you know, the CIA

1:16:42

guy and George Papi, George

1:16:44

Herbert Walker Bush was, yeah,

1:16:46

Papi, you know, the former

1:16:48

head of the CIA. I

1:16:50

mean, there are just so

1:16:52

many horror stories about Barrett

1:16:55

Gold, like in Tanzania, corpses,

1:16:57

environmentalists, showing up, you know,

1:16:59

turning up dead, Argentina, like

1:17:01

they go in, they bribe

1:17:03

officials. anybody who protests gets

1:17:05

disappeared or brutalized. They sue

1:17:07

critics in Britain. They used

1:17:09

to be able, they used

1:17:11

to do that sort of

1:17:13

where you shop for the

1:17:15

weakest libel laws. So like

1:17:17

Great Palace got his article

1:17:19

taken down because it was

1:17:22

in the observer. And basically

1:17:24

all you have to do

1:17:26

in Britain is have money

1:17:28

to successfully sue for libel.

1:17:30

But if they're making money,

1:17:32

can you really call that

1:17:34

tyranny mark? So here, that's

1:17:36

where Stanley is going to,

1:17:38

you know, basically he's being

1:17:40

paid blood money. There's no

1:17:42

other way to put it.

1:17:44

He's being paid blood money

1:17:46

to flee fascism and then

1:17:49

to pontificate about fascism. I

1:17:51

mean, you could, and Canada,

1:17:53

you know, and not just

1:17:55

shit on Canada, because America

1:17:57

is obviously guilty a thousand

1:17:59

times over, but I mean,

1:18:01

Canada, it's just that Canada

1:18:03

has this nicer reputation, but

1:18:05

its wealth is all built

1:18:07

on blood money, basically, and

1:18:09

extraction. Resource extraction. Not just

1:18:11

domestically, but globally, like we

1:18:13

are... Right, exactly. Number one

1:18:16

offender, globally, for money. So

1:18:18

the last thing I think

1:18:20

if you can if we

1:18:22

could talk about because Canada

1:18:24

now is heading towards elections

1:18:26

oh yeah which which will

1:18:28

you know I don't know

1:18:30

how this will impact the

1:18:32

coming US invasion but you

1:18:34

have you know a new

1:18:36

liberal party leader and prime

1:18:38

minister going up against the

1:18:40

the conservative. So can you

1:18:43

describe who they are a

1:18:45

little bit? Because the new,

1:18:47

Kearney, the new Liberal Prime

1:18:49

Minister, has been getting a

1:18:51

lot of rave reviews in

1:18:53

the kind of center center

1:18:55

left press here. I had

1:18:57

a friend describe Kearney perfectly

1:18:59

as a triscit in a

1:19:01

suit. And I actually photoshopped,

1:19:03

I was like, he does

1:19:05

kind of look like a

1:19:07

Trist hit, and I photoshopped

1:19:10

together like him as a

1:19:12

Tristket, and it was like

1:19:14

almost indistinguishable from his actual

1:19:16

photographs. But I don't know,

1:19:18

I'll start with Paulavir, because

1:19:20

he's the, and I refuse

1:19:22

to pronounce his name correctly,

1:19:24

because he's the conservative party

1:19:26

leader briefly before a Kearny

1:19:28

got elected as PM internally

1:19:30

in the liberal party. Polyver

1:19:32

was kind of, it seemed

1:19:34

like the conservatives might take

1:19:37

it and now they're trailing.

1:19:39

They're trailing in the polls.

1:19:41

I will start this by

1:19:43

saying, one of those reasons

1:19:45

is that their practical material

1:19:47

platforms are pretty much indistinguishable

1:19:49

from each other. But Polyver,

1:19:51

he's young, he won the

1:19:53

conservative. party leadership in 2022

1:19:55

and the thing you got

1:19:57

to know about him is

1:19:59

he is like a neutron

1:20:01

star of charisma like like

1:20:04

he is just an absolute

1:20:06

fucking vacuum of charisma there's

1:20:08

a there's a great video

1:20:10

of him trying to like

1:20:12

cut it up with a

1:20:14

common man. This is a

1:20:16

common conservative failure, right? Like

1:20:18

I'm gonna go to the

1:20:20

place of work and have

1:20:22

a beer with the fellas.

1:20:24

Right. So he's like fucking

1:20:26

trying to make a pizza

1:20:28

in Winnipeg and there's this

1:20:30

incredible scene of him just biffing

1:20:33

it and like the pizza is

1:20:35

sliding off the giant wooden paddle.

1:20:37

And he's just making these horrible

1:20:39

faces just being like, I mean,

1:20:42

I think on a practical level,

1:20:44

that's like all you need to

1:20:46

know. He's just like a vet

1:20:48

grown. So he started working

1:20:50

for the conservatives as a

1:20:52

teenager. He was involved with Stockwell

1:20:54

Day in the Alliance Party, which

1:20:57

was a right wing party in

1:20:59

the late 90s, early 2000s. He's

1:21:01

a Catholic and his biggest

1:21:03

political influence, according to him,

1:21:06

was reading Milton Freeman's freedom

1:21:08

and capital in high school.

1:21:10

It's so wild I have

1:21:12

to say like the enduring

1:21:15

influence of the neoliberal

1:21:17

and on the right especially

1:21:19

on the right actually the

1:21:21

people who constantly denounced

1:21:24

neoliberalism which they

1:21:26

just think means new liberals

1:21:29

or something like they don't

1:21:31

even know that and they'll say

1:21:33

you know I'm down screw the

1:21:35

neoliberal's I'm for Milton Friedman

1:21:37

like what the fuck is

1:21:39

wrong with you. His, so

1:21:41

his only job that wasn't

1:21:43

in the government was as a

1:21:46

collectionist agent for Tellis, which is

1:21:48

the big telecom monopoly. He's a

1:21:50

collection agent. He was a collection

1:21:53

agency for one of the two

1:21:55

big phone companies in Canada, one

1:21:58

of the two big telecom. monopolies.

1:22:00

So that involves actually

1:22:03

yelling at people who can't

1:22:05

pay their bills? Yes. Yeah.

1:22:07

Wow. That is kind of

1:22:09

the perfect job for a

1:22:11

conservative party leader though, isn't

1:22:13

it? Or Republican party leader.

1:22:15

Yeah, that's interesting. He's

1:22:17

a huge fan of

1:22:20

Bitcoin. He's anti-union, anti-raising

1:22:22

minimum wage. And like... His

1:22:24

strategies are basically this. So

1:22:26

his housing is a huge

1:22:28

issue in Canada right now.

1:22:30

We have a massive, massive

1:22:32

housing bubble that is partially,

1:22:35

if not entirely, the fault

1:22:37

of the other guy who's

1:22:39

running Mark Carney, who came

1:22:41

in and basically tried to

1:22:43

protect Canada from contamination

1:22:45

of the US crash

1:22:47

of 2007. So Pauliver's

1:22:49

strategy for housing is

1:22:51

too. build more houses.

1:22:53

How are we going to do that?

1:22:55

You know, get rid of red

1:22:57

tape. It's the abundance agenda. It

1:22:59

says recline. It is, which

1:23:01

is something that Kearney also

1:23:03

subscribes to. Kearney has been

1:23:06

talking about publicly about abundance

1:23:08

agendas. So they're both on

1:23:10

board with this. What about

1:23:12

financing? Do they talk about,

1:23:14

it's like, okay, nice, we'll

1:23:16

cut red tape, but somebody

1:23:18

still needs to put up

1:23:20

the money for it. Well, Kearney

1:23:22

has been vaguely threatening that

1:23:24

the government will get involved

1:23:26

with building houses, which he's

1:23:28

unclear what that means. He

1:23:31

likes to use the word

1:23:33

affordable a lot, which is

1:23:35

a great way of, you

1:23:37

know, dodging any government responsibility

1:23:39

to cap rent or real

1:23:41

estate prices. Right. But... It's

1:23:43

like the Democrats saying access

1:23:45

to health care. Yes. As

1:23:47

a way of avoiding saying,

1:23:49

yeah, universal health care. Yeah. But

1:23:52

yeah, so that's pretty much it

1:23:54

on Pauliver. His foreign policy is

1:23:56

he is anti-Russia, as his carnie,

1:23:59

he's anti-China. as is Kearney,

1:24:01

he blames Hamas for everything

1:24:03

that's happened in Israel and

1:24:05

Gaza. And the funniest thing

1:24:08

is he's deeply anti-Iran, except

1:24:10

he, like the Conservatives had

1:24:12

the Revolutionary Guard declared

1:24:14

a terrorist organization. Right,

1:24:17

Trump did that, yeah.

1:24:19

But their leader, their spiritual leader,

1:24:21

Stephen Harper, continues yearly to

1:24:23

meet with the MEK. Oh,

1:24:26

the MEK, amazing. Yeah, so

1:24:28

that's. That's gotten polar and

1:24:30

hot water with the Iranian

1:24:32

community voting-wise. And yeah, that's

1:24:34

about it. I mean, his

1:24:36

military policy is to reinvigorate

1:24:38

a Harper plan to build

1:24:40

a base in the Arctic,

1:24:42

which has been on the

1:24:44

books since 2008 and by

1:24:46

American aircraft. I remember that.

1:24:48

Yes. Ice Station Zebra, American

1:24:51

aircraft, American radar, American radar, and

1:24:53

somehow we're going to build, and

1:24:55

I want to ask you about

1:24:57

this, John. weaponized icebreakers.

1:25:00

So these are icebreakers that

1:25:02

have some kind of military

1:25:04

capacity like maybe they have

1:25:06

a cannon on them. Icebreakers

1:25:08

with freaking lasers! Yeah, I

1:25:10

imagine it would be about

1:25:12

like that. Yeah, you just

1:25:14

weld a few missile launchers

1:25:16

and a few deck guns

1:25:18

onto an icebreaker and you

1:25:20

got a militarized icebreaker. Yeah, this

1:25:22

is the most, we talked about this

1:25:24

day, this is the most war hammer

1:25:27

40K idea, I mean it does sound

1:25:29

cool. I've been on a Russian ice

1:25:31

breaker up in the Arctic Circle with

1:25:33

an actual, I got to actually see

1:25:35

the nuclear reactor in it.

1:25:37

You can hit

1:25:39

through this like

1:25:41

very thick glass,

1:25:43

see that I

1:25:46

was like, you

1:25:48

know, I was

1:25:50

like, don't! They're

1:25:52

huge. They're really

1:25:54

cool. They're very

1:25:56

cool. They're very,

1:25:58

I mean. If

1:26:00

it would flow, it would

1:26:02

be the war hammer 40k

1:26:04

ship of ships. I would

1:26:06

love that. Yeah. So that's

1:26:08

his plan. That's and that's

1:26:10

basically all over and you

1:26:12

know, he's got like a

1:26:14

mild version of like American

1:26:16

Republican identity politics, you know,

1:26:18

like, like, uh, DeI, anti

1:26:20

trans, anti LGBT, but softer,

1:26:22

you know, right. And then

1:26:24

on the other hand, we

1:26:27

have carny who is. I

1:26:29

would say the art typical

1:26:31

of overseer and you know

1:26:33

Mark you and I talked about

1:26:35

this, but here's here's his

1:26:37

resume. So he was a

1:26:40

former Goldman Sachs guy from

1:26:42

1995 to 2003 and he

1:26:44

worked on their response to

1:26:46

the Russian financial collapse of

1:26:49

1998. Yeah, that's bad news

1:26:51

because Matt Tabe wrote about

1:26:53

this for the Excel. Goldman

1:26:56

had some... I forget who gave us

1:26:58

the tip. It was somebody, somebody

1:27:00

who hated the Clinton's, who was in

1:27:02

DC, kind of gave us a tip

1:27:05

on this. It was good intelligence that

1:27:07

was passed on, and then Matt

1:27:09

sort of looked into it, reported

1:27:12

it. Yeah, Goldman basically was holding

1:27:14

on to a bunch of debt

1:27:16

that was gonna explode and

1:27:18

used its contacts with the

1:27:20

Clinton administration and jubies and

1:27:23

so on to dump it.

1:27:25

dump that bad debt that was

1:27:27

about to explode onto other investors

1:27:29

and got out, you know, with a

1:27:32

big profit rather than a

1:27:34

huge loss. So that was just

1:27:36

pure corruption and dirt. Like there

1:27:38

was nothing going on there

1:27:40

in Russia with Western investors

1:27:42

except trading on insider

1:27:45

information and debt and people's

1:27:47

misery. That's it. Nothing else. So

1:27:50

he was deeply involved with

1:27:52

that. He was deeply involved with

1:27:54

that. Deputy Governor of the

1:27:57

Bank of Canada, he worked

1:27:59

as Deputy Minister. finance, and

1:28:01

then became the governor of

1:28:03

the Bank of Canada during

1:28:05

the financial crash in

1:28:07

2007, and his fix

1:28:10

to insulate Canada against

1:28:12

contamination from the US market

1:28:15

was, if you could believe

1:28:17

this, ultra-low interest rates.

1:28:19

So there's a huge spike

1:28:21

in housing prices around 2010,

1:28:24

and in April 2012, Kearny

1:28:26

is on record saying that

1:28:28

there were quote, some issues

1:28:31

in the West dealt with

1:28:33

that was basically to massively

1:28:35

inflate. But he was, quote,

1:28:38

not too concerned about it.

1:28:40

You know what's so interesting

1:28:43

is that the way that

1:28:45

the US and Canada and

1:28:47

a lot of countries in

1:28:49

the West dealt with

1:28:51

that was basically to

1:28:54

massively inflate. assets to

1:28:56

make sure that the upper

1:28:58

20% and certainly the upper 1%

1:29:00

but you know even sort of

1:29:03

property holders of good

1:29:05

properties upper 20 25%

1:29:07

let's say were completely

1:29:09

insulated from this

1:29:12

collapse and and their their

1:29:14

assets were inflated as they

1:29:17

were about to go down that

1:29:19

is to say their their

1:29:21

property and you know in

1:29:23

stocks and so on. And it's

1:29:25

still in a hole from this,

1:29:27

but China is still dealing with

1:29:29

debt issues because its answer to

1:29:32

it was to massively build, over-built

1:29:34

real estate and apartments

1:29:36

and housing, so that now it has,

1:29:38

its problem is it has

1:29:40

too much housing for the people,

1:29:42

because they're worried, you know, the

1:29:45

Chinese leadership, and this is historical,

1:29:47

because of their historical experience,

1:29:49

is worried more than

1:29:51

anything about... instability

1:29:53

and people turning you know against

1:29:55

them in an anarchy whereas the

1:29:57

you know the the ruling class

1:30:00

classes in our countries and Kearney

1:30:02

is an agent of this are

1:30:04

really only worried about the

1:30:07

upper class and their retirement

1:30:09

accounts and their property values.

1:30:11

Yeah. And so that inflated the

1:30:14

value of housing so much

1:30:16

and it's still even getting worse

1:30:19

that that nobody can afford

1:30:21

it anymore basically is that

1:30:23

right? Yeah. Yeah I mean that's it.

1:30:26

I just as an example the

1:30:28

I'm sure John you're familiar with

1:30:30

the town of the Naimo

1:30:32

British Columbia. Oh yeah. The

1:30:34

armpit of Vancouver Island, the

1:30:36

hub city. Yeah, it goes

1:30:38

on forever and it never

1:30:40

gets any better. Yeah, yeah,

1:30:42

famously housed a huge House

1:30:44

Angels chapter that was importing

1:30:46

heroin like during the 90s,

1:30:49

but. So like the Naimo,

1:30:51

if you want to rent

1:30:53

a basement suite in Naimo,

1:30:55

British Columbia, where there are

1:30:57

no jobs, you can look

1:30:59

to pay between $1,800 and

1:31:02

$2,000 a month. Wow. So that's

1:31:04

the kind of housing crisis Canada

1:31:06

is dealing with right now.

1:31:08

Yeah, I hear Toronto

1:31:10

is insane. Right. he presides over

1:31:13

this and then in I didn't

1:31:15

know this until last week but

1:31:17

he went on to become governor

1:31:19

bank of England I know during

1:31:22

the time he oversaw the guy

1:31:24

the bank of England's response

1:31:26

to Brexit right so so

1:31:28

he is he is like the ultimate

1:31:30

he's like the wolf or something like

1:31:32

he comes in to clean up when

1:31:35

shit's hitting the fan he comes

1:31:37

in and takes care of the

1:31:39

right people make sure that the right

1:31:41

people are taking care of when there's

1:31:43

chaos that they can't completely

1:31:45

control. It's like, okay, a lot

1:31:47

of people are going to have to suffer,

1:31:50

but make sure that it's not our

1:31:52

people. Yeah. So Kearney now is, it looks

1:31:54

like he's probably going to win.

1:31:56

It may be, yeah, probably amazing,

1:31:58

because he's considered. that different

1:32:00

from Trudeau or because

1:32:02

the other guy just such a too much

1:32:05

of a knucklehead? I think

1:32:07

it's a combination of

1:32:09

both. I think it's, Polyvera

1:32:11

is such a charisma vacuum

1:32:13

that I think it's very

1:32:15

difficult for people to get

1:32:17

any momentum around him or

1:32:20

get excited about him. And

1:32:22

Carnegie, even if you look at

1:32:24

his record, which is not

1:32:26

great, you know, like, like his... his

1:32:28

record as a guy who fixes

1:32:31

things like Russia 1998 yes creating

1:32:33

a housing bubble and the response

1:32:35

to Brexit and and even recently

1:32:38

the liberal party one of the

1:32:40

one of the few good things

1:32:42

that they put forward before Trudeau

1:32:44

stepped down was a capital gains

1:32:47

tax. Kearney stepped in and his

1:32:49

first and only act as PM as

1:32:51

far as I'm concerned is

1:32:53

scrapping the capital gains tax

1:32:55

tax. To which the conservative response

1:32:57

was to make memes of him

1:33:00

as chairman Mao So that is the

1:33:02

political landscape in Canada that

1:33:04

that's what we're dealing with you

1:33:06

know And I'm not mentioning the

1:33:08

other political parties because they're not

1:33:11

really mentioning in this, but what

1:33:13

does Kearney say about Trump and

1:33:15

the and America's threats and the

1:33:17

tariffs and all that? I mean, Carney

1:33:19

claimed that he wouldn't meet with

1:33:22

Trump unless Trump respected Canada's sovereignty,

1:33:24

but then like immediately met with

1:33:26

him over the phone. And this

1:33:29

is a couple days ago, and

1:33:31

they claimed that he and Trump

1:33:34

had a, quote, productive conversation about

1:33:36

new economic and security relationship between

1:33:38

our two sovereign countries, repeatedly stressed

1:33:41

how good the meeting was, but

1:33:43

then switched to Duman gloom and

1:33:46

said, what he's the old world.

1:33:48

These old relationships, the old

1:33:50

order, it is over. Yeah,

1:33:52

but that's also what Trump

1:33:54

wants out there too.

1:33:56

Trump loves being this

1:33:58

transformational figure. who's putting,

1:34:00

who's scaring everybody and

1:34:03

making everybody think something

1:34:05

massively dramatic is going

1:34:07

on. Yeah, everybody is

1:34:09

promising. I think people just

1:34:11

want change in any direction.

1:34:13

It's just like, please, something

1:34:15

needs to happen. Right. And

1:34:17

these people are promising something

1:34:20

vague that's going to happen, but

1:34:22

they can't even describe the

1:34:24

contours of it, you know? I mean, I,

1:34:26

you know, correct me if I'm wrong here.

1:34:28

I hate doing predictions

1:34:30

ever since then. The Russian invasion.

1:34:32

Oh God, me too, man. I

1:34:34

know. I really blew it with

1:34:37

that one. I know. But that

1:34:39

said, I mean, if recent history

1:34:41

is any judge, Trump's gonna, Trump

1:34:43

is clearly, we said this, actually

1:34:45

we did predict this right, we've

1:34:47

been saying all along that Trump

1:34:50

too is gonna be a lot. He's

1:34:52

not going to be the Mr. Nice

1:34:54

Trump anymore. This is going to be

1:34:56

the bad Trump that we are getting,

1:34:58

and it's definitely turned out to be

1:35:01

that way. And the Trump's whole thing

1:35:03

for his power is to create

1:35:05

crises that he then manages and

1:35:07

makes everybody else scramble around and

1:35:09

respond to rather than waiting for

1:35:12

crises. He wants to keep everybody,

1:35:14

and he's doing that as well. But in

1:35:17

the end, in the end, my guess would

1:35:19

be that relations between... Canada

1:35:21

like all this talk, the

1:35:23

relations between Canada and the US

1:35:25

are not going to massively change

1:35:27

or even maybe change all that much

1:35:30

at all. All it will take for

1:35:32

the US for example, it'd be like

1:35:34

Biden is to have another, you know,

1:35:36

pseudo liberal, another Obama or

1:35:39

something or, you know, like Bernie

1:35:41

Birnbaum, I'll squirt a few and

1:35:43

you'll come back to me. Like,

1:35:45

yeah, exactly. Yeah, I mean, the

1:35:47

whole world elite seemed to...

1:35:49

except Biden as a

1:35:51

return to normalcy,

1:35:54

as Harding would have

1:35:56

said. And it lasted

1:35:58

less than... four years,

1:36:00

but I mean, they took it

1:36:02

at that. They took it on

1:36:04

faith. Like, you can't really be

1:36:06

abandoning us and our little deal

1:36:09

which has been so profitable for

1:36:11

all of us. Yeah, I mean,

1:36:13

we're locked for better or for

1:36:15

worse. I think probably for

1:36:17

worse Canada because the

1:36:19

decisions that it's made

1:36:21

geopolitically over the last

1:36:23

50 years is locked in a death

1:36:25

embrace with the United States.

1:36:28

The West is. going to decline.

1:36:30

It is a fact. Like I really,

1:36:32

you know, like whether it's a little

1:36:35

or a lot as anybody's guess,

1:36:37

but we are under the thumb

1:36:39

of the United States because

1:36:41

we just don't have the

1:36:43

manpower or the military to

1:36:45

challenge them in a meaningful

1:36:48

way. And the United States

1:36:50

needs Canada because we got

1:36:52

the water. We have the

1:36:54

resources. Right. Yeah. And it is

1:36:56

so, so it's good and bad. I

1:36:58

think, you know. there's going to have

1:37:01

to be some kind of compromise made

1:37:03

with whatever government's in place in the

1:37:05

United States and that'll be that, you

1:37:07

know? Unless we can decouple ourselves entirely,

1:37:10

which is not going to happen. So

1:37:12

there it is. Yeah, because the only

1:37:14

way you decouple would be to Europe through

1:37:16

Britain, but Britain is like 10 years ahead

1:37:18

of us in this in this death embrace.

1:37:21

Like, you know, and the lines with China.

1:37:23

Yeah, that's true. No, that would be a

1:37:25

real way, but yeah. Yeah. The ruling

1:37:27

class would never allow that

1:37:29

I would think. I don't

1:37:31

think so. Yeah. Yeah. Where's

1:37:33

Timothy Snyder going to go

1:37:36

then? You know? University of

1:37:38

Beijing? That sounds kind of

1:37:40

cool to me. I know.

1:37:42

I don't know. To defeat

1:37:44

tyranny you need to flee

1:37:46

as the arms of managed

1:37:48

democracy. You must become tyranny.

1:37:50

Yes. All right, I think

1:37:52

this would be a good

1:37:55

place to end it. Thank you

1:37:57

so much Dan Bickner of Yeah, that was

1:37:59

a great show Thank you, a

1:38:01

Always a pleasure to

1:38:03

talk to either of

1:38:05

you. you. Yeah, thanks so

1:38:08

much for having me

1:38:10

on. for right, right, thanks everybody.

1:38:12

to you soon. Bye.

1:38:15

Bye, guys. talk to you soon. Bye.

1:38:17

Bye, guys. You

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features