Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Released Friday, 25th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Stephen Fry on passion, privilege, and the power of storytelling

Friday, 25th April 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Kate here. Just a quick one. Before you

0:02

dive into this episode with Stephen Fry, this

0:05

was recorded ahead of the

0:07

BBC's announcement that he was

0:09

indeed joining the lineup of

0:12

celebrity traders. How exciting. Can't

0:14

wait. Enjoy the episode. Coming

0:21

up on this episode of White

0:23

Wine Question Time. The

0:26

worst thing a contestant

0:28

can ever ever

0:30

say is, it's before

0:32

my time. Everything's

0:34

before your time in a quiz, or should be,

0:36

or could be. How dare

0:38

you use that as an

0:40

excuse? That's absolutely pathetic. I love this.

0:42

You're making Anne Robinson look cuddly at this

0:45

point, Stephen. Ask

0:47

someone who's been through that

0:49

because they will know. But I

0:51

have had every door open

0:53

to me without me having to

0:55

knock on it, and that

0:57

sounds so... such a dreadful thing

0:59

to have to admit because

1:01

you know one ought to have

1:03

struggled and it's deeply unfair

1:05

for me to be so lucky

1:07

is is just extraordinary yeah but

1:09

you did you did have to kind of recover

1:11

from being sent to prison to get into

1:14

the university so you know listen hello there's

1:16

some early struggle in there I'm gonna just

1:18

remind you of that that's that's a

1:20

bit of a hill to climb So

1:23

whenever I hear people talk

1:25

about the woke mind virus and

1:27

how wokeness is destroying the

1:29

world I just want to remind

1:31

them that just yes there

1:34

have been some people on the

1:36

left who have said preposterous

1:38

things and insisted on rules and

1:40

things in universities and elsewhere

1:42

that make you feel The

1:44

world's got a bit

1:46

mad. Yes, that is true.

1:48

But compare that to

1:50

some of the suffering, misery,

1:52

exile, loneliness, mockery, shame, and

1:55

general suicidal horror that

1:57

faces young people growing

2:00

up gay around the world. Like

2:03

the old theatre joke, how do you get

2:05

an elephant off the stage? Do

2:07

you get an elephant off the

2:09

stage? You can't, it's in his blood! That's

2:14

the point. It has to be in

2:16

your blood. It's no good saying, oh,

2:18

I thought about, you know, maybe going

2:20

into an eco company or a charity

2:23

working in Africa, and then I thought,

2:25

actually, no drama school. No, forget

2:27

it. No, yeah. It's drama school or

2:29

nothing since you were eight years old.

2:31

Really, it's just who I am. I

2:33

just have to do it. It

2:35

doesn't mean you'll succeed, but it's the

2:37

first requirement. Hello

2:42

and welcome to Right Wine Question Time, the

2:44

podcast that asks its guest three thought -provoking

2:46

questions over three glasses of wine. And

2:48

my guest this week is a man who

2:50

is known not only to many, but

2:53

I go as far to say as

2:55

he's pretty much known to any and

2:57

everyone in fact. Be it young children

2:59

listening to his readings of Harry Potter

3:01

as their gateway into a world of

3:03

books, his film work in movies like

3:05

The Hobbit, Peter's Friends, Sherlock Holmes, and

3:08

Wild, all to comedy fans who've grown

3:10

up with him and his work on

3:12

everything from Blackadder and Jeeves and

3:14

Wooster to hosting shows like QI.

3:16

Then of course there's the books.

3:18

the plays, the television dramas, be

3:21

they Apple TV's The Morning Show

3:23

or his many, many documentaries. It's

3:25

been a life thus far of

3:27

the highest highs and the most

3:29

crashing of lows. A voyage

3:31

of constant self -discovery alongside

3:33

an almost magical carpet ride

3:35

professionally that's seen him accrue

3:37

huge success in all of

3:39

his many chosen fields. A

3:42

professional passion junkie, if you

3:44

like. Such is the length and

3:46

breadth of all that he's done.

3:48

There are three volumes of his

3:50

autobiography, now available, and for his

3:52

50th birthday, some 17 years ago,

3:54

BBC Two dedicated two nights of

3:57

programming to his work. It's almost

3:59

impossible in this introduction to do his

4:01

CV any kind of justice, so I'm not

4:03

going to attempt to do it here,

4:05

but I promise that we will dive into

4:07

the corners of so many of his

4:09

experiences, achievements, passions and

4:11

love. in this next hour.

4:14

Now 67, he lives between North London

4:16

and Norfolk with his husband of

4:18

10 years, Elliot, and is back on

4:20

our screens hosting the second season

4:22

of the game show Jeopardy for ITV.

4:25

Oh, what a thrill. Let's dial him in.

4:27

It's Sir Stephen Fry. Well,

4:34

good morning Los Angeles. Greetings.

4:38

Hello, Antigua, or wherever you find

4:40

yourself. Antigua, yes, indeed, indeed.

4:42

I feel like I'm living

4:45

in the White Lotus right now,

4:47

Steven. I'm just waiting for

4:49

a body. Oh, dear. But

4:52

can I say, you look remarkably

4:54

well, sir. you. You

4:56

look twinkly -eyed and bushy -tailed. Thank

4:59

you. I feel well. I feel

5:01

very well. You look remarkable. How

5:03

is Los Angeles? It's

5:06

usual self -riddy. Obviously, areas

5:08

of it are recovering from

5:10

the quite monstrous and upsetting fire

5:12

of a month or so

5:14

back. The area where

5:16

I am in the Hollywood Hills

5:18

has been spared. This time, you

5:20

never know. Yeah, this is the thing.

5:22

This is the thing. And how

5:25

long are you out there for, Stephen? Oh, just

5:27

a couple of weeks. Have they taken well

5:29

to the news that you are

5:31

now hosting one of, well, American

5:33

televisions? most institutional

5:36

shows jeopardy. I

5:38

think they're very pleased. They were

5:40

very shocked that most British people don't

5:42

know what it is because it's

5:44

such an institution. Yes, naturally

5:46

because It's been going since

5:48

1963. It's the longest running quiz

5:50

show in the world. It's an absolute institution

5:52

in America. Yeah, Jeopardy is the OG, the

5:55

original gangster. I would say,

5:57

I would say, yeah. And there is

5:59

no British equivalent, really. I mean, at seven o 'clock,

6:01

what do we have? I think that's,

6:03

is that Emma Dale or something that? Yeah, it's

6:05

the tail end of the one show. Yes,

6:07

indeed. The one show finishes and

6:10

gives way to... it gives way

6:12

to. But for

6:14

some reason in America, they have

6:16

the hour of Merv Griffin, who

6:18

was the divisor of Jeopardy and

6:20

also Wheel of Fortune, which follows

6:22

in the next half hour. He's

6:25

the divisor of both. That's

6:28

some serious IP. Oh

6:30

yeah, and his wife actually

6:32

contributed the most obviously weird

6:34

factor that people notice who

6:36

don't know it, which is

6:38

that instead of asking the

6:40

contestants questions, we give them

6:42

answers and they have to say

6:44

what the question is. There's actually an

6:47

interesting reason behind it. Some people

6:49

may remember the Robert Redford film quiz

6:51

show. Yeah. Which was about a

6:53

scandal in the 1960s, early 60s on

6:55

a show called The $64 ,000 Question,

6:57

I think it was called. And

7:00

the production team had

7:02

basically colluded with

7:04

one of the contestants by giving

7:06

him the answers. And it caused a

7:08

change in the law. People were so

7:10

outraged that they weren't. Yeah, so that

7:13

now these things are covered by criminal

7:15

law if you try and pull one

7:17

over the public. So everything

7:19

has to be fully recorded and

7:21

fully understood and fully monitored. And

7:24

the same with Britain. There's very strict

7:26

laws about these things because you're giving

7:28

money away. So fraud can come in.

7:30

So perhaps it's not so surprising. So

7:32

anyway, Mrs Griffin said

7:34

well let's avoid any of

7:36

those things of giving them the

7:39

answers by making sure that

7:41

we give them the answers on

7:43

air and they have to

7:45

give us the question and it

7:47

was like a sort of

7:49

little joke to avoid it because

7:52

After that scandal, a lot of quiz

7:54

shows have gone off the air

7:56

and the networks had stopped believing in

7:58

quiz shows because of the potential smell

8:00

that came off this

8:02

scandal. The name jeopardy

8:05

is very important as well because

8:07

there's risk involved. There's betting involved. You

8:09

bet what you've won at the end

8:11

and that can turn the game

8:13

upside down. And it's a rollover game.

8:15

So you can watch people getting

8:17

richer and richer as long as they

8:19

stay on and beat that. two

8:21

new contestants every time. And the

8:23

difference between here in America is whatever you win

8:25

here in the UK, you keep. In America, there's

8:27

tax to be paid on whatever prize you win.

8:29

So quite often people might, for example, win a

8:31

car, but can't afford the tax, have to give

8:33

the car back. Yes, it's a strange

8:35

thought, isn't it? What

8:41

I love, Stephen, is that you are taking

8:43

one of the oldest formats in television on

8:45

air right now and having huge success with

8:47

it at a time when scheduled

8:49

television, linear television, traditional kind

8:51

of, you know, appointment to

8:53

view television, is really fighting

8:55

hard to survive in the

8:58

face of such, you know,

9:00

innovation, this kind of digital revolution that

9:02

we are flying our way through.

9:04

It's quite something, isn't it? Yeah,

9:07

I think

9:09

the two elements

9:11

that clearly have

9:13

a place in Terrestrial

9:15

TV as we know it as we

9:17

grew up with our quiz shows and

9:19

sport because you don't know what's going

9:22

to happen next and it doesn't matter

9:24

if you've missed the one before because

9:26

you know you pick up and there's

9:28

nothing really to pick up you just

9:30

say oh it's you know cunt turns

9:32

on or the chase is on I'll

9:34

just watch that while I'm waiting for

9:36

my cab or whatever you know I'll

9:38

just wait it you know just watch

9:40

it I haven't seen it for ages

9:42

and you watch it you tune

9:44

in and it's enjoyable and I

9:47

think also for different

9:49

generations at each end of the

9:51

spectrum. For students, they love often

9:53

in TV and quizzes. I get

9:55

a lot of wonderful response about

9:57

jeopardy from students to colleges and

10:00

and schools indeed, who watch

10:02

it and love playing

10:04

it. And similarly from retired

10:06

people, I suppose, but

10:09

both of whom tend

10:11

to be the prime culprits

10:13

for watching daytime TV. And

10:17

you don't always want to watch something. You

10:19

know, it's like there's fantastic

10:21

stuff on the big streaming entities,

10:23

but it's very high calorie

10:25

and high nutrition and protein dense.

10:28

And sometimes you just want to snack.

10:30

You don't want the full, the full

10:32

thing. Absolutely. And that's that's a huge part of

10:34

the poll, isn't it? So when this landed on

10:37

your desk, your agent called you and says, Oh, Stephen,

10:39

you've been offered jeopardy. Was it a

10:41

hard yes or a boom? It's

10:43

been a while since you hosted Quiz. You

10:45

stepped back from QI, what, 10 years ago?

10:48

I'm not sure of the years, but yeah,

10:50

certainly probably around then. Yeah. Actually,

10:54

it didn't happen like you suggested to

10:56

talk. Well, it kind of did, but it

10:58

really didn't. I was over here in

11:00

Los Angeles where I am at the moment,

11:02

and I was guesting on a a

11:05

series called The Morning Show, which Apple

11:07

TV do. And I had

11:09

the odd day off and a

11:11

lot of days off. And one

11:13

evening I was dining with my

11:16

agent and he said, what do

11:18

you guys do when you're not called

11:20

on set and you've got a free day

11:22

and free evening? And I said, oh,

11:24

we're very dull, really. We don't go in for Hollywood

11:26

parties and that sort of thing. Launches and

11:28

premieres much. If we can avoid them,

11:30

we tend to stay in and watch Jeopardy

11:32

and have an early supper and go

11:34

to bed. He said, oh, you guys like

11:36

Jeopardy. And I said, yes, yeah, we

11:38

do. Yeah, it's great. How can you not?

11:40

He said, yeah, me too. Me and

11:43

my wife, we adore it. And we chatted

11:45

about it. And he said, did you

11:47

watch it when you were growing up in the

11:49

UK? I said, we don't have it in

11:51

the UK. He said, you're kidding me. But

11:53

he didn't say that, he said, you're shitting me. That's

11:56

our Americans talk, especially

11:59

agents. And

12:01

so I said,

12:03

no, we don't have it, which I've always thought was

12:05

a bit of a shame. Anyway, we then changed the

12:07

subject, didn't think much more about it. And

12:10

a couple of days

12:12

later, he calls me up and said,

12:14

oh, British TV broadcaster is very excited

12:16

about you hosting Jeopardy over there. I

12:19

said, what? I never said that.

12:21

He said, oh, you don't want to do it. I

12:23

said, well, I mean, it's not quite what

12:26

I meant. Seriously? Oh,

12:29

let me think about it. So I thought

12:31

about it and said, why

12:34

not? If it works, it'll

12:36

be lovely. If it doesn't work,

12:38

it'll be, oh dear, that didn't work and

12:40

onto the next thing. With any luck, you

12:43

know, but the crucial

12:45

thing was that ITV

12:48

understood that My love

12:50

was for the format of

12:52

Jeopardy as it is in

12:54

America. The

12:56

one difference is they insisted they wanted a

12:58

one hour show, not a half hour

13:00

show. So we've added an

13:02

extra category in each board and an

13:05

extra board. So it is longer,

13:07

but it still rattles along, which is,

13:09

you know, the first series was

13:11

good and we were pleased that it

13:13

all worked and there were some

13:15

wonderful shows, but we felt that it

13:17

could be even quicker. because I

13:20

think part of the pleasure of it

13:22

is the rat -a -tat as the

13:24

questions come out and you see the

13:26

speed and reflexes of the contestants and

13:28

so on. So I think

13:30

we've cracked that in this series

13:32

and I think it's really fabulous and

13:35

we've had some amazing contestants. This

13:37

one who's on at the moment, he's

13:39

23, he's a hotel

13:41

receptionist from Wales and

13:43

his range of knowledge

13:45

is absolutely astonishing. And

13:48

it doesn't seem to matter how old

13:50

he is. There's a thing anybody who's ever

13:52

presented a quiz or indeed who watches

13:54

a quiz regularly will tell you is nails

13:57

on a blackboard. The worst thing

14:00

a contestant can ever, ever

14:02

say is, it's

14:05

before my time. Out.

14:09

Go away. We don't want

14:11

you anymore. You're fired from the quiz.

14:13

Just get out. You know,

14:15

I mean, frankly, what

14:17

was the name of the emperor who

14:19

ruled France in the 19th century

14:22

and lost the battle of Waterloo? It's

14:24

before my time. Bloody idiot! Everything's

14:28

before your time in a quiz or should be

14:30

or could be. How dare

14:32

you use that as an excuse?

14:34

That's absolutely pathetic. I

14:37

mean, if I asked you a

14:39

question, what happened in the year

14:41

2041, you could legitimately say, that's

14:43

before my time, but nothing else

14:45

of that life. I mean, anyway. I

14:48

that you're making Anne Robinson look cuddly at this

14:50

point, Stephen. No, you

14:52

can see Richard Osman used to be like

14:54

that when he was on Pointless. If

14:56

someone said before my time, he

14:58

and Zonda would just

15:01

shiver and go... You

15:03

can't say that. Do

15:05

you know what though? You think

15:07

like him as well. I hear this

15:09

when you're talking now. You have

15:11

a producer's head, which makes you an

15:14

excellent presenter of a format because

15:16

you have produced. I mean, in the

15:18

introduction to this episode, I describe

15:20

your CV as something of a magic

15:22

carpet ride that unpacks what is

15:24

a passion junkie. And I hope that's

15:26

an affair and accurate description of

15:29

all that you are and all that

15:31

you've on and continue to do. Well,

15:33

it's a very charming one, Kate, and

15:35

I will take it happily. Thank you. Yes,

15:38

it has been like a magic

15:40

carpet ride. It's been very, you know...

15:43

It causes problems of a

15:45

strange kind. Like

15:49

a lot of people who've been

15:51

fortunate to get into the public

15:53

eye and pursue some sort of

15:55

a career in the media and

15:57

the arts that they love, the

16:00

creative sector, whatever you want to call it. I

16:03

get requests from people

16:05

and their parents saying, My

16:08

boy and my girl wants to

16:10

get into show business, wants to get

16:12

into publishing, has written

16:14

a book, has a YouTube channel

16:16

that nobody subscribes to. And how

16:18

do they get an agent? How

16:20

do they get noticed? I mean,

16:22

this question is obviously asked a

16:25

great deal to people. And

16:27

I am

16:30

in the awful position of saying, I don't know.

16:32

You have to think about this and

16:34

ask someone. who had

16:37

real struggle getting into show business. Ask

16:39

someone who's knocked on a lot of

16:41

doors. Ask someone who's had

16:43

to find out who the agents are and

16:45

where they live and what sort of

16:47

letter to write and whether or not to

16:49

accompany it with a treatment or a

16:51

full manuscript or a pitching deck or all

16:54

the other things that you read about

16:56

if you want to get into show business.

16:58

Ask someone who's been through that because

17:00

they will know. But I have had every

17:02

door open to me without. me

17:04

having to knock on it and

17:06

that sounds so such a dreadful

17:08

thing to have to admit because

17:10

you know one ought to

17:12

have struggled and it's deeply unfair

17:15

for me to be so

17:17

lucky is is just extraordinary

17:19

and You

17:21

also have to be good at once you get

17:23

through the door. I mean, your first French

17:25

win in 1980, you won. You took

17:28

a show that you had created

17:30

to the French and you won. So,

17:32

yes, the door may have been

17:34

easily accessed, but nevertheless. Yeah,

17:36

I know. And obviously,

17:39

it... once you're in that doorway

17:41

you have to prove your worth

17:43

and show that you're worth looking

17:45

at or listening to or whatever

17:47

but for so many they say

17:49

I just need to get that

17:51

door open how do you do

17:53

it and and as I say

17:55

it sounds like I'm either boasting

17:57

or just a sort of feeble

17:59

fake modesty or something but it

18:02

is actually just a practical thing

18:04

is that I don't really

18:06

know the answer because I

18:08

haven't had to go through

18:10

that process of applying to

18:12

a drama school law, applying

18:14

for an agent or... getting

18:16

a script read or all

18:18

that sort of thing, or

18:20

even really auditioning. Yeah,

18:23

but you did have to kind of

18:25

recover from being sent to prison to get

18:27

into the university. So, you know,

18:29

listen, hello. There's some early struggle in there.

18:32

I'm going to just remind you of that. That's

18:34

a bit of a hill to climb. And

18:36

I do work extraordinarily

18:38

hard, I think. You know,

18:41

I have a very

18:43

strong work ethic and I'd

18:45

like to think

18:47

that's obviously also something to do

18:49

with it. And

18:51

yeah, I mean, I'm not

18:53

going to be, as I

18:55

say, ridiculously overmodest

18:58

about this, but if you

19:00

want to help people. you

19:03

have to be practical. And

19:05

I would say, you know,

19:07

if you think about it, someone

19:09

who's had an experience like

19:11

yours and overcome it is a

19:14

better bet to go to

19:16

for advice than someone who hasn't

19:18

had that experience. But I

19:20

would also add that I think

19:22

things were easy for me

19:24

and for Hugh and for my

19:26

people in a similar kind

19:28

of mode of performer writer because

19:30

we wrote. And

19:32

I think when it comes

19:35

to performing, if you

19:37

believe you're a comedian or you're a

19:39

good comic actor, you

19:41

need material. And if you're

19:43

not going to write it yourself and create it

19:45

yourself, it's very unlikely someone will

19:47

do it for you. And

19:49

so it is understanding how

19:51

to be a writer

19:53

and a performer at the

19:55

same time and for

19:57

them both to come. naturally

20:00

to you as part of what you

20:02

are and what you do. You've

20:15

used a lot of other

20:17

literature that you've loved and inhaled

20:19

and then spun your own

20:21

kind of... take on it,

20:23

so be it Jeeves and Worcester, you

20:25

took me and my girl, for example,

20:27

to the West End, and then to Broadway,

20:29

and it ran for eight years. I

20:31

mean, you didn't write that, but you brought

20:33

it back to life, and that is,

20:36

and then of course, Wild, portraying your idol,

20:38

you know, and doing

20:40

that so, so well. Well, thank

20:42

you. And yeah, all this has been

20:44

a great, great ride. There's no

20:46

question. And

20:48

I think, I think also

20:50

I've had the, the

20:52

great good fortune to

20:54

remember and a lot of

20:57

people forget that that

20:59

I'm more of a consumer

21:01

than a content provider. That's

21:05

to say all my

21:07

life I've read books and

21:09

read plays and seen

21:11

films and regarded myself as

21:13

a consumer of these

21:15

things and being allowed to

21:17

create them comes out

21:19

of that. And it

21:22

sounds sort of obvious, but a lot

21:24

of people do forget that. They will

21:26

say things like, I'd really like to

21:28

write a film, and I'd say, well,

21:30

how many screenplays have you read? They'll

21:33

go... I haven't read

21:35

any. We said, well, they're out there. They're available

21:37

to read, and a lot of them are in

21:39

the public domain, or very,

21:41

very cheap, or you just subscribe to

21:43

one service. You can read the screenplays

21:45

of films you know and love, and

21:47

read screenplays of films you don't know, or

21:50

films you've hated, and see

21:52

how they work. you're

21:55

not born with a gift for screenplay

21:58

writing any more than someone is born

22:00

with a gift for Gothic architecture. You

22:02

have to look at a Gothic cathedral

22:04

and understand what a Gothic arch is

22:06

and how Gothic architecture works before you

22:08

can then design your own. It's

22:11

not something you're born

22:13

with. These are all

22:15

acquired skills. And

22:18

similarly with writing a play,

22:20

have you just not? gone to

22:22

a library or bought a book

22:24

of plays by Chekhov or Ibsen

22:27

or Shaw or Beckett or Stoppard

22:29

or whoever you admire and

22:31

just read them and see how

22:33

they're put together because and I

22:35

remember hearing years ago Elton John

22:37

talking to someone about that and

22:39

he said how many records do

22:42

you buy every week and

22:44

the guy who was successful so

22:46

they could afford to buy as

22:48

many as they wanted said, I

22:50

sometimes buy some. And

22:52

Elton Johnson sometimes. Aren't

22:54

you a music fan? I buy

22:56

hundreds a week. Well, of course, he's

22:58

Elton, and we know his spending is

23:01

legendary, but he meant

23:03

it. He goes... And that's why

23:05

you see him working with

23:07

young artists. who only

23:09

just stepped out of the cradle almost

23:11

and have just begun, but because

23:13

he's so alive to what's going on in

23:15

the career that he's made his own, that

23:17

he loves so deeply, he has

23:20

heard them. He's heard their demo tapes

23:22

or someone he trusts and said, oh, you

23:24

should hear this new artist. They're pretty

23:26

amazing. And he will listen. And he'll go,

23:28

wow. And then he'll reach out and

23:30

say, oh, I'd love to record with you.

23:32

And people go, what? But

23:34

that's, you know, I mean, that's

23:37

how it... that's how it should

23:39

be in a way and and

23:41

if you so and I feel

23:43

I've got I'm constantly addressing people

23:45

who are trying to start out

23:47

because I know how incredibly hard

23:49

it is it is for them

23:51

and so and you also really

23:53

want them to be able to

23:55

step into this Narnia that we

23:57

exist in right with that yeah

23:59

where everything is possible or that's

24:01

right and people constantly

24:03

people are in search of talent.

24:05

It may seem like doors are

24:07

slammed in your face and that

24:09

there's no opportunity to do it.

24:11

You know, how could I write

24:13

a pilot for a TV show

24:15

these days? Or if I do

24:17

just do my own channel on

24:19

YouTube, who's going to watch it?

24:21

Just a few friends. How will

24:24

it get viral? How will it

24:26

get noticed? All these questions asked

24:28

all the time. But it's worth

24:30

remembering that weirdly, whenever one goes

24:32

to a producer's office, head

24:34

of a studio, whatever it

24:36

might be, a streaming studio,

24:38

or a broadcasting company, a

24:40

network, whatever you call these

24:42

things. There are people

24:44

who go, but

24:46

where are the writers? Oh, you

24:49

know, they will have a desk piled

24:51

with unread scripts, and they'll be able

24:53

to say, oh, there are no writers,

24:55

because weirdly, there is this desperate. thirst

24:58

and hunger and appetite for

25:00

writing talent and for performing

25:02

talent, too. Who are we

25:04

going to cast in it?

25:06

Who's a young, funny girl

25:08

who's, oh God, we

25:10

need someone. Is there anybody like that? You

25:12

know, and at the same time, there are

25:15

thousands trying to knock on the door and

25:17

get noticed. So there is this sort of

25:19

strange disconnect in show business. There really is.

25:21

Yeah. The both things are true.

25:24

What is it that turns your head?

25:26

For example, when something like, it's a sin

25:28

lands on your desk. This is not

25:30

something that you've written yourself, but it's a

25:32

story that I know you felt compelled

25:34

to help tell. What is

25:36

it that will make things

25:38

pop for you? Well,

25:40

the names Nicola Schindler and Russell

25:42

T. Davis carry a heck of

25:44

a lot. Don't they? They've worked

25:46

together a great deal. And obviously,

25:48

Russell's very well known for queer

25:50

as folk and what he did

25:52

with... the reboot of Doctor Who

25:54

and many other things. And so

25:56

the very fact that your agent

25:58

says, I'm sending a script from

26:01

Russell Davis. In fact, it was

26:03

Russell himself who sent it to

26:05

me because I've known Russell for

26:07

years. So didn't even come from

26:09

my agent. And so naturally I

26:11

read it. And as someone who

26:13

was exactly the generation that is

26:15

being addressed here, I mean, I

26:17

literally left university in June 1981.

26:20

and moved to London, then

26:22

to Edinburgh, in fact, with

26:24

our group that did our

26:26

show in Edinburgh. But that

26:28

summer in London, before

26:30

going up to Edinburgh, that July, was

26:33

when I first heard about this

26:35

strange illness that only seemed to

26:37

affect gay people. It was

26:39

called grid at the time. Gay

26:42

-related immune deficiency,

26:44

grid. So...

26:48

know one just vaguely heard

26:50

about it and then within a

26:52

year and a year and

26:54

a half suddenly it was the

26:56

subject on everybody's lips and

26:58

the entire gay world and indeed

27:00

the entire world was talking

27:02

of little else it just became

27:04

this enormous and terrifying thing

27:06

so reading of that was you

27:08

know it was just amazing

27:11

it was it might never stop

27:13

crying while reading it you

27:15

can't it's just so so extraordinary

27:17

and and you don't get

27:19

a project like that very often,

27:21

something that Channel 4 are

27:23

prepared to get behind, requires

27:25

a budget, which is very difficult

27:27

for companies like Channel 4 these

27:29

days. Even the BBC, you

27:31

know, I'm sure you saw the wonderful Charlotte

27:33

Moore, the head of content at the BBC.

27:35

She was saying, you

27:38

know, if adolescents had come

27:40

to us, we would have had to

27:42

say, well, we'll cut it down. We can't

27:44

do it with the... the

27:46

one shot, all the rehearsals and they,

27:49

you know, having to... a

27:51

house for six months and

27:53

the school and the extras

27:55

in the school in the

27:57

second episode and all of

27:59

those things just made it

28:01

impossible for the BBC. So

28:03

even something like It's a Sin

28:05

for Channel 4 was a heck

28:07

of a punt and a really

28:09

bold thing for them to do

28:11

and shows great credit on what's

28:14

left of our broadcasting sector that

28:16

they're still trying to make things

28:18

that really connect and matter. And

28:20

the stuff that matters, you're absolutely right,

28:22

it's doing stuff that matters. And

28:25

another project of yours on your

28:27

CV that I was drawn to, sort

28:29

of moth to a flame -like, was

28:31

out there. And

28:33

I really wondered if it's possible that

28:35

you might consider going back and telling

28:37

that story again, doing today's take on

28:39

what it is. I

28:41

mean, out there was a two -part

28:43

doc, wasn't it, about what it

28:46

is to be gay. Yeah, about

28:48

why there is to be gay

28:50

in countries where you're not welcome.

28:52

Essentially, it was about charting different

28:54

forms of homophobia, I suppose is

28:56

the most convenient thing to call

28:58

it, around, or non -acceptance, certainly,

29:00

around the world, amongst different

29:02

kinds of gay people

29:04

at different stages of, if

29:06

you like, opening up

29:08

of gay culture and community

29:10

within their particular countries

29:12

and sovereignties. So, you know,

29:14

in Brazil there's a

29:16

there was such a strange

29:18

mixture of gay pride

29:20

marches like the one in

29:22

Sao Paulo which is

29:24

the most enormous parade I've

29:26

ever seen in my

29:28

life absolutely astounding and seeing

29:30

all the wonderful mixture

29:32

of trans gay people dancing

29:34

and singing in the

29:37

streets and then having to

29:39

interview as he was

29:41

then senator Bolsonaro who became

29:43

the corrupt and vile

29:45

president of Brazil for

29:47

a while. And hearing him

29:49

say he would kill a child of his if they came

29:51

out as gay. If my son

29:53

told me he was a queer, I would shoot him. So,

29:55

you know, having to speak to people like

29:57

that. And then in a country I greatly

30:00

Uganda, having to speak

30:02

to these pastors and

30:04

ministers who were fighting for

30:06

a death penalty for

30:08

their country. And one

30:11

of whom said to me and trying to...

30:13

to hold it together on my part.

30:15

And this man said, he

30:17

was talking about the rape and

30:19

the terrible behavior. And I said, well,

30:21

yeah, there is a rape crisis

30:23

in Uganda. And I've read about it.

30:25

And it's mostly the terrible rape

30:27

crisis is women being raped in particular.

30:29

Yes, by men. Young girls

30:31

being raped by men. The

30:33

incidences of gay rapes

30:35

seem Absolutely nonexistent, they're not

30:37

there. Ah, he said, yes, there is that

30:40

rape that you speak of, but at

30:42

least that is the right kind of rape. He

30:45

genuinely used that phrase, and I

30:47

mean, you can't begin...

30:49

To address this all you can

30:51

do is show it That's what

30:53

a documentary can do because you

30:55

know that the temptation for me

30:57

was to get into arguments with

31:00

these people or to have a

31:02

stand -up row with them and so

31:04

on but as we know from

31:06

the internet from social media and

31:08

so on When people don't listen

31:10

when people say things that are

31:13

so outrageous as to as to

31:15

you know rip the heart from

31:17

your body almost You don't don't

31:19

try and fight them just show

31:21

them for what they are, just

31:23

keep the camera on them and

31:25

let the audience decide what they

31:28

think of it and give a

31:30

voice to as many of the

31:32

voiceless as possible. So if you're

31:34

going to speak to someone like

31:36

that, then speak to this like

31:38

a wonderful lesbian girl I spoke

31:41

to who's more or less in

31:43

hiding. She was, you know, correctively

31:45

raped as the awful phrase is

31:47

by someone her family chose to.

31:49

to rape her in order to

31:51

stop her from being a lesbian.

31:53

I mean it just some of

31:56

the stories are beyond heartbreak that

31:58

child murder in Brazil having to

32:00

speak to the mother whose son

32:02

was tortured by gang for hours

32:04

and hours before being killed. I

32:06

mean these things so whenever I

32:09

hear people talk about the woke

32:11

mind virus and how wokeness is

32:13

destroying the world I just want

32:15

to remind them that just Yes,

32:17

there have been some people on

32:19

the left who have said preposterous

32:21

things and insisted on rules and

32:24

things in universities and elsewhere that

32:26

make you feel the world's got

32:28

a bit mad. Yes, that is

32:30

true. But compare that to some

32:32

of the suffering, misery, exile,

32:35

loneliness, mockery, shame and

32:37

general suicidal horror that

32:39

faces young people growing

32:41

up gay around the

32:43

world. as the rhetoric is

32:45

ramped up against them

32:47

as they become the

32:50

new Jews of the 1930s,

32:52

if you like, people on whom

32:54

a dictator can dump all

32:56

the fear and paranoia and all

32:58

the wicked desire to stir

33:00

up a population. It's there.

33:02

They're after your children. The gays

33:04

are after your children. The gays are

33:06

destroying our way of life. They're

33:08

from the West. They are what I'm

33:10

protecting you from, you know, and

33:12

thus the fascism rises in Turkey and

33:15

Belarus. Everywhere

33:17

else where these leaders

33:19

are using... That

33:21

rhetoric, yeah. That rhetoric,

33:24

yeah. It's deeply...

33:26

I mean, you're talking to me today from

33:28

Los Angeles. There's a

33:30

huge sea change

33:32

in conversation around LGBTQ

33:34

rights there. I

33:36

mean, you're in a very

33:38

liberal part of the country,

33:40

but... That doesn't extend to

33:42

all states. It certainly

33:44

doesn't, no indeed. And we're

33:46

aware of what's going on

33:49

in America and it's very grim.

33:51

My solution, as always, is

33:53

to turn to story because I

33:55

think if you try and

33:57

tell people about abstract ideas such

33:59

as fascism and progressivism and

34:01

nativism and thisism and thatism, their

34:03

eyes cloud over and they

34:05

don't want to hear it. And

34:07

why should they? Because these

34:09

terms are pretty meaningless and they

34:11

get thrown around like balls

34:13

of mud and they don't lose

34:15

any actual kind of applicability

34:17

to real life. Whereas stories which

34:19

are taken out of time

34:21

and context. They

34:24

can express truth in a much

34:26

better way. And

34:28

whatever you think of them,

34:31

a vast, vast number of

34:33

young people have grown

34:36

up on Harry Potter. And

34:38

they should look at America and

34:40

see that there is one who

34:42

should not be named. who

34:44

has begun a cult, a cult

34:46

of death eating rather as in

34:48

Harry Potter. This resentful,

34:50

bitter, angry, paranoid figure is

34:52

now in charge and wants

34:54

to destroy Hogwarts and the

34:56

Ministry of Magic and all

34:58

the ministries of magic and

35:00

all the magical world and

35:02

wants the death eaters to

35:05

take over and has no

35:07

love or respect for mudbloods

35:09

or people who are different

35:11

and wants to combine everybody

35:13

into destroying what once was

35:15

and was beautiful and did

35:17

its best, but was, of

35:19

course, flawed. And

35:21

in Hexith and Vance,

35:23

you can see crab and

35:25

guile, the knuckles grazing

35:28

the ground, these bullies, these

35:30

hideous low -browed bullies. And

35:32

in Lucius Malfoy, you

35:34

see musk. And

35:37

you see this

35:39

bullying and this destruction

35:41

and this darkness. And

35:43

so I would say what we

35:45

need is for the young to

35:48

say we have to be stout

35:50

and strong and loyal and brave

35:52

like Hermione and Ron and Harry

35:54

and we have to save Hogwarts

35:56

and the magical world for all

35:58

its faults and we can make

36:00

it better. But what isn't better

36:02

is this cult of death and

36:04

destruction. Radical.

36:06

They are radical, the right. That's

36:08

the thing. They pull things

36:10

up by the roots, and

36:13

radix is root. That's

36:15

what the word means.

36:17

Yes, it does, yeah.

36:19

They are disruptive, and

36:21

their disruptions is based

36:23

on that kind of

36:26

tech bro cavalier madness

36:28

that says, first,

36:31

break things, and then

36:33

debug. Just

36:35

destroy it and then debug. That's

36:37

not the way a wise person

36:39

behaves. But there's no fact at the

36:42

root of this. You talk about

36:44

uprooting and pulling things out of the

36:46

ground. They're actually pulling facts out

36:48

of thin air that aren't facts. They're

36:50

opinions. They're presented as facts. And

36:52

what's that expression, Stephen, that a lie

36:54

is halfway around the world before

36:57

the truth has even got its boots

36:59

on? That is where we live

37:01

right now, I fear. I fear. Yeah,

37:03

that's right. But

37:06

I love the comparison with with Harry

37:08

Potter. And, you know, I said in the

37:10

introduction to this episode that you are

37:12

not just known to many, I would suggest

37:14

that you are known to any because

37:16

most young, I mean, you are known to

37:18

the young because you are their gateway

37:20

into literature. You are their bedtime story. And

37:22

actually, that's that's really important

37:25

at a time like this, where you are

37:27

able to learn the story about right and wrong.

37:29

I think so, yeah. And,

37:32

you know, I think it's

37:34

no accident that things like

37:36

the Greek myths that I've

37:38

been involved in now for

37:40

the last seven years have

37:42

taken off enormously. I don't

37:44

mean my books, I'm very

37:46

delighted that they have sold

37:48

very well and both in

37:50

audio and in... and continue

37:53

to do so. But

37:55

there are also other books, novels,

37:57

stories are written around the myths and

38:00

young people are really embracing them

38:02

because I think When something

38:04

is set in the present

38:06

day, it is caught in the

38:08

weeds of our current cultural

38:10

discourse, what we're obsessed with at

38:12

the moment, matters of race

38:14

and gender and sexuality and the

38:16

history of slavery and all

38:19

these different things on the one

38:21

side and heritage and loyalty

38:23

and patriotism and duty on the

38:25

other, are all concerned with

38:27

these things. And so you write

38:29

a story set in the

38:31

present day. say, who's that person?

38:33

What does she represent? Oh,

38:36

I know people like that. She's really

38:38

annoying. She's vegetarian. Oh, God,

38:40

I know what he's like.

38:42

He drives a petrol hungry

38:44

car, doesn't care about things.

38:47

You know, everybody suddenly represents

38:49

a point of view. Whereas

38:51

when you a story in

38:53

Greek myth or in is

38:55

stripped of all that, and

38:57

you can write about honour

38:59

and decency and integrity and

39:01

rape and murder and betrayal

39:03

and all the really huge

39:05

subjects but without them being

39:07

applied to this identity or

39:09

that identity in our current

39:11

world they're not about us

39:13

now they're about us always

39:15

they're about the very nature

39:17

of who we are not

39:20

just the kind of particular

39:22

colour clothes we're wearing now

39:24

and so much of what

39:26

you present by way of your thinking

39:28

comes from the books that you read.

39:30

And something that I read yesterday in the

39:32

third volume of your autobiography, and it

39:34

made me sort of sit up and

39:36

go, you're so right. It's

39:38

the rereading of books, right? You don't just listen

39:41

to a record once. And,

39:43

you know, we tend to go, oh, I've read that. And

39:45

actually, you made me rethink so much of that.

39:47

Of course, there are books that I've gone back

39:49

and read more than once, but they're a handful

39:51

of them. It's not a regular practice. And

39:54

there's a learning from that. I

39:56

agree with you. Yeah. Not

39:58

all books will reward one in the

40:01

same way. Not because the book

40:03

is necessarily not a great book. It's

40:05

just... one's particular match with it

40:07

as a person oneself. For some people,

40:09

they'll go back and reread X,

40:11

Y and Z. But the person they're

40:13

very fond of and their best

40:15

friend, or indeed they're married to, will

40:18

read other sorts of books. And

40:20

it's such a rich, in the same

40:22

way that some people like tomatoes and

40:24

some people prefer cucumbers. It's

40:26

not a big, it's not

40:29

a very subtle point. But yeah,

40:31

rereading is as natural for

40:33

books as it has. Hearing

40:35

the same music again. I mean what kind

40:37

of person would say, I

40:39

love that track, but I'm never going to

40:42

listen to it ever again. Exactly. That

40:44

would be weird. And if you

40:46

think about it, a book will mean something to

40:48

it at different stages of your life, right? right.

40:50

That's the important bit. Yeah,

40:53

Dorothea Parker said when she was

40:55

reviewing a particular production of Hamlet,

40:57

and she said, it's an amazing

40:59

play, Hamlet. I go and

41:01

see it every seven years or so,

41:03

and each time I find that Shakespeare

41:06

has rewritten it for me. because

41:09

that's the effect a book can

41:11

have. Also, of course, you're

41:13

reading a book, yes,

41:15

to find out what happens next, what's

41:17

going to happen to this character or how

41:19

is it described, but you're

41:21

also reading it simply for the

41:23

experience of reading it, for what

41:26

it feels like to read that

41:28

book, where it takes you, what

41:30

it does to your emotions and

41:32

your feelings, how it makes you

41:34

feel secure or indeed... excitedly,

41:36

thrilled and nervous, whatever the

41:38

feeling may be. And

41:41

sometimes with some

41:43

books, you can't

41:45

wait for time to pass because you've

41:47

reread it recently and you want to

41:49

give it maybe a year. So when

41:51

you come back to it, you'll get

41:53

the full experience again. Do you enjoy

41:55

reading autobiographies? I do very much.

41:58

I think with

42:00

autobiographies of people

42:02

that I've that I

42:04

know about or have heard about and I'm

42:07

interested in, I usually

42:09

find, usually find the

42:11

most interesting bits of the

42:13

childhood and the growing

42:15

up and the first steps

42:17

towards whatever it is

42:19

that will make that person

42:21

worth writing an autobiography

42:23

about. So either into politics,

42:25

if it's, I don't

42:27

know, some extraordinary world leader

42:30

like... or somebody like

42:32

that. But if it's

42:34

an actor or an artist,

42:36

once they become famous and well

42:38

known and they know lots

42:40

of famous people, it becomes a

42:42

bit of a ticking off

42:44

the various different achievements, which is

42:46

much less interesting than the

42:48

first faltering steps, the disaster of

42:51

childhood, whatever happened to

42:53

the young person. and their

42:55

parents and so on. I

42:57

find that more interesting as

42:59

a rule. Yeah, and you've

43:01

written your books as such

43:03

actually. Well, I suppose because

43:05

I feel that a very colourful youth. Yeah,

43:08

I sure did. Yeah, I

43:10

suppose as a writer you make

43:12

the assumption that people will

43:14

have the same... same

43:17

responses that you do. In other words,

43:19

that they will be more interested in

43:21

me before I was just yet another

43:23

showbiz figure. And Rowan said, dot, dot, dot.

43:25

Although, of course, people do like a

43:27

bit of gossip too, but I'm not

43:29

the kind of person who's going to be

43:31

incredibly rude about the people I've worked

43:33

with and loved. So they're not going to

43:36

get much. You

43:50

had an experience at university.

43:53

As many of the guests on this podcast over the

43:55

last six and a half years have had, the likes

43:57

of, for example, Ed Edmondson

43:59

or Steve Pemberton, where you've met

44:01

your people purely by fate,

44:04

by virtue of the fact that

44:06

you all got into the

44:08

same place of education. And that

44:10

for you was entirely transformative. And

44:12

sometimes you have to sit back and go, could

44:15

you have made that happen or did that

44:17

just happen to you? Do you know what I

44:19

mean? Absolutely. It's so hard

44:21

to know. And you try and picture what

44:23

would have... I mean, in my case, for

44:25

example, if I hadn't screwed up my life

44:27

when I was 15, 16, I would have

44:29

gone to university when I was 16, except

44:31

when I would have finished my A -levels

44:34

when I was 16. I would have gone

44:36

when I was 17, which is probably too

44:38

young. But in those days, that's how you

44:40

did things. And it

44:42

would have been a totally different

44:44

group of people I would have

44:46

had to know. And who knows

44:48

whether I would have got on

44:50

with them. I might have been

44:52

much less confident in... you know,

44:54

creating stuff with them, sharing a

44:56

stage with them, you know, writing

44:58

with them, all those things would

45:00

have been harder and I would

45:02

now be, I don't know, either

45:04

a very happy, successful teacher or

45:06

academic or a very sad, embittered,

45:08

annoyed one, I don't know. How

45:10

can one possibly know? Those sliding

45:12

doors, they're there to

45:14

drive one mad. Things are

45:16

so contingent. but

45:18

all one can do is say gosh

45:20

how lucky that I you know I

45:23

was just looking at photographs the other

45:25

day of me on stage with Hugh

45:27

Laurie Emma Thompson and and Tilda Swinton

45:29

doing a sketch for the Footlights and

45:31

thinking at the time we were just

45:33

worrying, oh God, we haven't rehearsed enough

45:35

and the audience is going to be

45:37

in half an hour, oh Jesus, it's

45:39

going to be a disaster. That's all

45:42

you think about. You don't think, and

45:44

I shall be watching Tilda

45:46

accepting her Oscar and Emma accepting

45:49

her Oscar. It just doesn't,

45:51

I mean, I did

45:53

realise how talented all these people

45:55

were and how lucky I was

45:57

to be doing stuff with them,

45:59

but you don't necessarily believe that.

46:01

just because your friends are talented,

46:03

they're going to get Oscars. Many

46:07

have slipped to its cup and lip. Well,

46:09

yes, quite. Do you think

46:11

there's a truth to the fact that once

46:13

you are around such excellence, it forces you

46:15

to bring your A -game? You know, it

46:18

brings out the very best in you.

46:20

Yes, if you ask a chess player

46:22

or a tennis player, the

46:25

surest way to get

46:27

better, they'll say, play someone

46:30

who is better than you, but

46:32

not so much better that you

46:34

just feel useless, just a bit

46:36

better, that you almost feel you

46:39

can beat, but they just keep

46:41

beating you. And that

46:43

makes you better at chess, because you're

46:45

just having to work out what they're

46:47

doing that makes them slightly better than

46:49

you, similarly with tennis. If they're way

46:51

better than you, you've just got no

46:53

chance. And I felt

46:55

that with you and Amon,

47:00

they could do so many things

47:02

that I couldn't do and that

47:04

they you know their talent was

47:06

so remarkable that if I was

47:08

going to write a sketch for

47:10

them or with them it had

47:12

to be just amazing and yeah

47:14

I think your point is valid

47:16

that it's a huge advantage to

47:18

work with people talented enough to

47:20

to force one to improve oneself. Yeah

47:23

but also that they were very generous and

47:25

collaborative there wasn't like you know Nobody

47:28

hid their light under their own bushel. There was

47:30

a shared light. Yes. Also,

47:32

of course, it's like

47:34

a team. You know, it's

47:37

not quite true, but let's imagine

47:40

it's true that you can only

47:42

have one up front striker in

47:44

a football team. Well,

47:47

if... got a group of five people who

47:49

will want to be strikers, they're not going

47:51

to help each other that much. They're going

47:53

to get in each other's way. Whereas the

47:55

lovely thing with Hugh, me and Emma and

47:57

Tony Slattery and Paul Shearer and the all

47:59

there was that we all had just slightly

48:01

different things we were good at. So we

48:03

were able to say, oh, Paul, this would

48:06

be a perfect monologue for you. And

48:08

Hugh, you've got to come on with a guitar

48:10

and do this. And then say, oh, Steven, this is

48:12

a big wordy one. You come on and do

48:14

the wordy, wordy bit. And Emma,

48:16

you do the mix. of the song and

48:18

the crazy woman or whatever. And

48:20

none of us trod on each other's

48:22

toes or thought, I wanted to

48:24

do that one. Or it's not a

48:26

zero sum game. And

48:28

the success of one doesn't

48:30

diminish your own success or

48:32

your own sense of satisfaction. Indeed,

48:36

the reverse. So yeah, we're

48:38

very lucky. Well, an entirely

48:40

rewarding experience to have been

48:42

thrown together. Yes, immensely

48:45

so. Again,

48:48

there's good fortune, but one

48:50

can push oneself towards that good

48:52

fortune slightly in as much

48:54

as if you're a student at

48:56

a university and you love

48:58

the idea of going up, you

49:01

know, if you can

49:03

afford it these days to get to

49:05

Edinburgh and to do a show, then,

49:08

you know... Remember

49:10

the collaborative nature of it. I sometimes hear

49:12

people saying, oh, we're going to take

49:14

a review show, a sketch show out to

49:16

Edinburgh. Tom

49:18

is going to write it, Mary's

49:20

going to direct it, and we'll cast

49:23

it in a few weeks. I'll

49:25

go, no, no, that's, I mean, may

49:27

work. Don't necessarily take my word

49:29

for it. But all my experience says,

49:31

no, no, get together a group

49:33

of people. You all make

49:35

each other laugh. Write together. Decide

49:38

stuff you're going to do together. Maybe

49:40

go off in pairs. You know, remember

49:42

that with the pythons, it was Eric

49:44

Heidel wrote on his own, but... Chapman and

49:46

John Cleese wrote together and Michael Palin

49:48

and Terry Jones wrote together and then

49:50

they'd all come together and tear each other

49:53

apart and suggest things. They'll say, oh

49:55

yeah, we couldn't finish this one. Graham

49:57

and I started it, we couldn't finish

49:59

it. Oh, we'll finish it for you. Just

50:01

keep it all open and talking. Don't

50:03

say Tom's going to write the show.

50:05

That's never going to work. If he wants

50:07

to write a play, fine, the playwright

50:09

can sometimes write a play on the

50:11

red, but this kind of thing, it's

50:13

your company, your group, and act

50:15

as a group and do stuff together. And

50:17

two of you, if you have a little

50:19

double act, go and try it out in

50:21

the pub and then come back and try

50:24

stuff out during the term. Just keep trying

50:26

it and be a troupe rather than just

50:28

bring it all together as, oh, we're going

50:30

to do a show. It

50:32

has to be an organic thing that

50:34

comes together over a long period, the

50:36

longer the period, the more you practice

50:38

in front of an audience, whether it's

50:40

in a pub or on the street,

50:42

or just doing it on YouTube and

50:45

funding enough people to watch it. But just

50:48

got to keep doing it. You've got to

50:50

keep doing it. There's

50:57

a scene in the red

51:00

shoes. wonderful Powell Pressburger

51:02

movie with Maurizio and

51:04

Anton Walbrook. And Anton Walbrook

51:06

plays this kind of,

51:08

Lemontov, his name is, he's

51:10

a kind of impresario

51:12

for ballet. He's like Diaghilev,

51:14

really, the ballet roost, and it's set

51:16

back in before the war. And

51:19

this mother has a

51:21

very talented ballet dancer daughter,

51:24

and they're at the

51:26

Covent Garden seeing a ballet.

51:29

They go up to this impresario in

51:31

the interval and the mother taps him

51:33

on the shoulder and says, my daughter's

51:36

very, very good ballet dancer. Here she

51:38

is. Will you see her for your

51:40

company? And he just looks and

51:42

says, why do you want to be a ballet

51:44

dancer? And she says, oh, well,

51:46

you know, I've been told I'm very good

51:48

at it and I enjoy it. And he

51:50

just turns rather rudely away and walks off. And

51:53

the mother says, well, you know, very

51:55

outright that this man could be so

51:57

rude. And you then see

51:59

this wonderful shot of Mauritius and her eyes

52:01

sparkle and she walks towards the camera and

52:03

then it sort of cuts around and you

52:05

see she's walking after him. She taps him

52:07

on the shoulder as her mother had done

52:10

and he turns around. I've told you I'm

52:12

not seeing anybody. She says, no, I just

52:14

want you to know that I gave you

52:16

the completely wrong answer when you asked me

52:18

why I want to be a ballad dancer. And

52:21

he said, oh, really? Why? And

52:24

she said, because I don't want to

52:26

be one. I am one. I have to

52:28

be one. I can do

52:30

nothing but dance. It's what I am.

52:32

It's who I am. And

52:34

he looks at her for about

52:36

10 seconds. Come

52:39

round and see me tomorrow morning. Because

52:41

she's given the right answer. And that

52:43

is the right answer. You know, it's

52:45

like the old theatre joke. How do

52:47

you get an elephant off the stage?

52:50

How do you get an elephant off the

52:52

stage? You can't. It's in his blood. That's

52:57

the point. It has to be

52:59

in your blood. It's no good saying,

53:01

oh, I thought about, you know,

53:03

maybe going into an eco company or

53:05

a charity working in Africa. And

53:07

then I thought, actually, no drama school.

53:09

No. No. Yeah. It's drama

53:11

school or nothing since you were eight years

53:13

old. Really. It's just who I am.

53:15

I just have to do it. It

53:18

doesn't mean you'll succeed, but it's the

53:20

first requirement. I love that.

53:22

And then, you know, and then your passion for

53:24

it. Sometimes I've done workshops and things and

53:26

people have said they really want to be an

53:28

actor. And I'll say, tell me

53:30

your favourite five actors. And

53:33

I'll go, ooh. And

53:36

then I'll say, tell me the five

53:38

actors you really think are overrated, which I

53:40

keep secrets. But if you... you're

53:42

an acting student, you talk to anybody

53:44

that is a drama school, or people who

53:46

want to go to drama school, or

53:48

people who are just starting out like that,

53:51

and you'll say, who do you really

53:53

hate? And they'll go, ooh! And they'll say

53:55

someone, because they'll notice the mannerisms. And

53:58

when you're young, you're very impatient

54:00

of mannerisms. They'll go, oh, that

54:02

person, they think they're so, oh,

54:04

they're terrible. I can't bear how

54:06

everybody likes them, or whatever. And

54:08

that's another sign. it's

54:11

your world acting and theatre and performance

54:14

and comedy and writing or whatever it

54:16

whatever the particular art we're talking about

54:18

is yours and you've always felt it

54:20

since you were young that you you

54:22

you deserve a place in it and

54:24

therefore you have strong opinions about the

54:27

people who are in it, you worship

54:29

some of them, you adore them, you

54:31

give anything to meet them and talk

54:33

to them and other ones you think

54:35

you are so bloody overrated, you are

54:37

so mediocre and I hate you, you

54:39

know, and it's an overreaction and you'll

54:42

calm down when you get to your

54:44

forties, you won't feel quite so angry,

54:46

but it's important when you are young

54:48

that you do feel like that because

54:50

it matters and you're in a hurry

54:52

and you should be. And

54:54

also, you think they're occupying a space that

54:57

should rightfully be yours because you're better. There

55:00

is that sense of, not entitlement,

55:02

but that's the wrong word, but

55:04

it should be me. And

55:06

also Oscar Wilde, it's a lovely

55:08

line that I was so lucky to

55:10

be able to say. It is

55:12

one of the better ones, he says,

55:14

because it's not wildly funny. It's

55:16

just so penetratingly true. And it seems

55:18

so outrageously paradoxical, but it is

55:20

so profoundly true. when

55:22

he first meets Posey, Jude Law, in

55:24

the film. And he

55:26

says something about, Wild says, I

55:29

think Jude rather,

55:31

or Posey rather,

55:34

modestly, unusual for him, because he's

55:36

still glamorised at having just

55:38

met Wild. So something self -deprecating.

55:40

And Wild says, no, no, no, no, I

55:42

have the greatest respect for the young. I

55:44

adore the young. They have so much more

55:46

experience. And

55:48

that, of course, is a paradox. How

55:50

can the young have more experience young?

55:52

Yeah, they can't. But they do, because

55:54

they have experience in the world. The

55:57

young are in the world in a

55:59

way that the old are slightly out

56:01

of the world. I mean we may

56:03

have our hands on the levers of

56:05

power in terms of being on this

56:07

committee and that committee and having you

56:09

know met all these people and knowing

56:11

the minister of arts or having met

56:13

the prime minister or you know all

56:15

these kind of things that seem like

56:17

to be of the world but young

56:19

people are in the eating places, in

56:21

the entertainment places, in the places of

56:23

the world where things are happening and

56:25

boiling Where life lives, yeah. And where

56:27

life lives, and they get that experience

56:29

that I'm, it's completely close to me.

56:32

So... You're at home watching Jeopardy! Exactly!

56:34

Listen, I'd better go. We've got over

56:36

an hour and I'm supposed to be

56:38

somewhere to it. Thank you been wonderful.

56:40

Stephen, thank you so much for your

56:42

time today. Enjoy Los Angeles and whatever

56:44

it is that's occupying you out there. Stephen

56:51

Fry returns to our screens with

56:54

the second season of Jeopardy now

56:56

on ITV and streaming on ITVX.

56:58

I can also heartily recommend all

57:00

three volumes of his autobiographies slash

57:02

memoirs. Whatever you want to call

57:04

them, it is a fascinating read

57:06

of a life truly well lived.

57:08

And for more episodes with other

57:10

big thinkers and brilliant people in

57:12

their chosen fields, we have episodes

57:14

with Sir Tony Robinson, his former

57:16

Black Adicoster in our back catalogue.

57:18

There's Alistair Campbell in there. Edmondson,

57:21

Stuart Lee, Alan Cumming, Giles Brandreth,

57:23

Griffwish Jones, Jonathan Dimbleby, Reverend Richard Coles

57:25

and Reverend Kate Botley. Steve Pemberton's

57:27

in there as well and, in fact,

57:29

so many. All just ready and

57:31

waiting for you to hit download. I'll

57:34

be back on Tuesday with a

57:36

little something from the cellar. But in

57:38

the meantime, thank you so much

57:40

for tuning in and downloading what I

57:42

think has been a really special

57:44

White Wine Question Time. White

57:56

Wine Question Time is a stacked

57:58

production and part of the ACAST

58:00

Creator Network.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features