The new space race – with Tim Marshall

The new space race – with Tim Marshall

Released Monday, 8th May 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
The new space race – with Tim Marshall

The new space race – with Tim Marshall

The new space race – with Tim Marshall

The new space race – with Tim Marshall

Monday, 8th May 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

From the gas pump to the grocery store, inflation

0:03

is everywhere. Seriously,

0:06

make it stop. Thankfully, there's

0:08

one company out there that's giving you a much

0:10

needed break. It's Mint Mobile.

0:13

As the first company to sell premium wireless

0:15

service online only, Mint Mobile

0:17

lets you order from home and save a ton, with

0:19

phone plans starting at just $15 a month. All

0:23

plans come with unlimited talk and text, plus

0:25

high-speed data delivered on the nation's largest

0:27

5G network. To get your new wireless

0:29

plan for just $15 a month, and

0:31

get the plan shipped to your door for free,

0:34

go to mintmobile.com. That's

0:37

mintmobile.com. Have

0:40

you seen the cost of eggs lately? With

0:43

these prices, we'd barely be scraping

0:45

by if it weren't for Dave. What's Dave?

0:48

It's the banking app that advances us up to $500 instantly.

0:51

There's no interest, no late

0:53

fees, or even credit checks. No joke. We

0:55

can get extra cash for anything our family needs.

0:59

Download the Dave app or go to dave.com. Sign

1:01

up for an extra cash account and get up to $500 instantly.

1:04

For terms and conditions, go to dave.com. Instant

1:06

transfer fees apply. Banking services provided by

1:08

Evolve Bank & Trust, member FDIC.

1:20

Hello, I'm Katie Stallard, and you're listening

1:22

to World Review from The New Statesman, a

1:25

twice-weekly international news podcast.

1:31

Every Monday, we interview a guest for their

1:33

unique perspective and expertise. Then,

1:35

later in the week, we come together to unpack some of

1:37

the most significant stories in world affairs.

1:40

Today, I'm speaking to the journalist and author

1:43

Tim Marshall, whose books include

1:45

the international bestseller Prisoners

1:47

of Geography. We'll discuss his

1:49

new book, The Future of Geography, and why

1:52

the next Great Power contest will be

1:54

in space.

2:01

Tim, thanks for joining me. It's great to have

2:03

you on the podcast. Thank you for the

2:05

invitation. And I think in

2:07

the interest of clarity, we both should

2:10

admit that we're former colleagues in another life.

2:12

We are, yes. Listeners know

2:14

you as the internationally acclaimed bestselling

2:17

author. Tim Marshall, I first

2:19

met you many years ago where we both worked at

2:21

Sky News and where you were extraordinarily

2:24

kind and generous and encouraging to

2:27

those of us humble lowly reporters.

2:29

I particularly remember you taking me for a coffee before

2:32

I headed off to Moscow and

2:33

downloading all of your wisdom about

2:35

spheres of influence, the near abroad. Having

2:38

thoroughly embarrassed you. As true politics

2:40

and the future of geography,

2:43

space, the final frontier,

2:45

the next great geopolitical battleground,

2:48

what first drew you to look

2:50

up and to tackle this

2:53

extraordinarily complex?

2:55

I think it's fair to say subject.

2:58

It is complex, and yet at the same time,

3:00

it's less complex

3:02

the moment it hits you that, hang on a

3:04

minute, everything that's happening up there is happening down here.

3:06

And hopefully I know a couple of things

3:09

about what's happening down here and it's

3:11

being mirrored up there. And George

3:13

Orwell said that sometimes the hardest thing to

3:15

see is what's right in front of your nose. And it's

3:18

been obvious for several years, but it was

3:20

just that sort of clarity of thought that

3:22

it's the same and that therefore,

3:25

as I write about international relations,

3:28

this is simply another area

3:31

in which that is playing out. So

3:34

let's write about that because there's

3:36

a lot of very learned and much more expert

3:38

people than me writing about this,

3:41

but I didn't see a book

3:43

for the lay person, which is what I

3:46

am as well. And I was fascinated

3:48

by the subject. So on I went. So

3:52

you, you go through really the entire

3:54

of humankind's history of thinking about space,

3:57

starting I think that actually with the Big Bang.

3:59

I tell you when I start Katie, it is 0.00001 second

4:03

after the Big Bang. So

4:06

I interrupted you, but yeah, what I wanted to do was

4:09

frame our relationship as

4:11

humans with the cosmos from its

4:14

earliest times that we were conscious of it and how

4:16

we explained

4:18

things through the gods and the ghosts,

4:20

as I say, but then through a very

4:23

long journey and then accelerating

4:25

through science, a better understanding

4:28

of it is now. So I just, the beginnings of the

4:30

book frame it before we get to the politics.

4:33

If we skip through several billion

4:35

years, I wanted to really look at

4:37

the Cold War in particular as our starting

4:40

point and how that

4:42

great contest really drove

4:44

the space race of the last century. Really

4:47

accelerated it and to our,

4:50

central to our consciousness, culminating

4:53

in those incredible scenes when Neil

4:55

Armstrong actually walks

4:57

on the moon. But it

5:00

was an integral part of the Cold War and

5:03

it was, and you

5:06

know this from your previous life

5:08

in Moscow and Beijing and of course now

5:10

Washington, those two of the great

5:12

epicenters, the

5:15

current space race, but the previous

5:17

iteration was Soviets and

5:20

the Americans. And each side really

5:23

wanted to use the space race to prove

5:25

that their system was the superior system

5:28

and therefore this was the journey mankind,

5:30

humankind as we now say should take. And

5:33

in the research, I came across this clip

5:35

by Kennedy. Now

5:37

Kennedy's great space speech, the

5:39

one that's most remember is, is we don't go there

5:41

because it's easy. We go there because it's

5:43

hard because

5:45

he went on to be the mayor of Quimby and

5:47

the Simpsons, but leave that to one side. Excellent.

5:50

Flawless. Yeah. But

5:52

I found that another section in the 1962

5:55

Congress speech where he says in terms,

5:58

we need to win this. so that

6:01

people have a better,

6:02

easier decision to make when

6:04

they decide which fork in the road

6:07

humankind is going to take. He actually spelt

6:10

it out, that's what it was about. And I do think

6:12

it underpinned it. And of course there was the military aspect

6:14

to it as well. That was the underpinning.

6:17

It was the politics of the Cold War that

6:19

propelled Neil Armstrong to the surface of

6:21

the Moon.

6:23

And there was a real chance that the Soviets

6:25

would win that race. Can you give us a sense

6:27

of the context? I think what we remember, particularly

6:29

I'm speaking from the United States, is the great triumphant

6:32

small step for man on the Moon. But

6:35

actually the late 1950s, it really

6:38

looked like it might not be the US.

6:40

Yeah. Soviets were first

6:42

up with Sputnik and only a few

6:44

days later, the Americans tried

6:46

to launch their satellite to say, look,

6:49

we have parity. And it blew up on the launchpad

6:51

in the full view of the cameras and the headlines

6:54

were Flopnik and then,

6:56

I mean, they did get parity, but then the

6:58

Russians, Soviets, went ahead with Gagarin,

7:01

first human in space. And

7:03

again, the declassified materials that

7:06

the White House and others have put out

7:08

subsequently make it quite

7:10

clear that the Americans were aware that many

7:12

of their allies were looking at them and thinking,

7:14

are we backing the wrong horse in this race? It's

7:17

not that they would all Britain and France or whoever

7:19

would immediately have switched sides. But

7:22

it's a little bit similar to the situation with

7:24

Taiwan now. In

7:26

the event that Taiwan was to fall without the

7:28

Americans giving any support to Taiwan,

7:31

as every single American friend

7:33

in the region would start to think, ah,

7:35

okay. And that

7:37

was the rationale again that, and

7:40

the embassies were sending in reports back

7:42

to Washington saying, all our allies

7:45

are asking questions. How powerful

7:47

are you? Are the Soviets going to win this? And

7:50

this was clearly part of the strategic thinking.

7:53

You have a great quote,

7:55

which I'm going to ask you to replicate because I can't fully

7:57

remember the wording, but of the impact.

7:59

of reaching the moon and

8:02

what that did then for the future of the US space

8:04

program. I

8:06

think it was Tom Wolfe's quote as if

8:08

because it was great in most of his work and

8:11

forgive me if it was somebody else's but yeah he was he

8:13

wrote a long magazine article that it was one

8:16

giant leap for mankind one

8:18

knee in the groin for NASA

8:20

because understandably

8:24

Nixon looked at this looked at the cost of

8:26

it and then Apollo 12 went came

8:29

back Apollo 13 tried to go and didn't make

8:31

it but came back. Apollo 14 went Apollo 50

8:34

and he's saying what's

8:35

the point we've done that why are we

8:37

spending all this money and he pretty much pulled the plug

8:41

on the funding and they switched to

8:43

the space shuttle which was amazing

8:46

and the ISS also amazing

8:48

but that's actually the reason there's two

8:52

answers to the question why has

8:54

it taken us seven to sixty years

8:56

fifty years sorry before we're going

8:59

back because the Americans intend to be back in 2026 and

9:03

the first answer is that one is

9:05

that quote the knee in the groin

9:07

what's the point of going back but the second

9:10

one is that was fueled by

9:12

the international relations of the time this

9:14

is fueled by that as well but

9:17

by the commerce

9:18

by the race for resources

9:21

by the military space race

9:23

by the fact that the private enterprise

9:26

is now putting in gazillions

9:28

of dollars so that's reignited

9:31

it and Musk I

9:33

wouldn't say single-handedly but Musk

9:35

has vastly reduced the costs

9:38

of

9:38

breaking out of the atmosphere with

9:40

the reusable rockets the

9:42

technology of reducing the size of the satellites

9:45

to almost a Rubik's Cube certainly

9:47

a shoebox size has reduced

9:50

the cost for

9:52

second and third tier players to

9:54

actually be out there and

9:57

so it's here and now in its front and center.

10:00

So what does this mean firstly for

10:02

I think the right terminology is low Earth

10:05

orbit and how crowded

10:07

but how consequential

10:09

that sphere has become? It's

10:11

a very important sphere. And of

10:13

course, the space out there is finite because

10:16

it's a ring. And

10:18

it's prime, it's prime real estate.

10:20

It's where so many of the satellites are,

10:23

both observation, whether you name

10:25

it, that's where they are. Some of

10:28

the military early warning systems

10:30

are there as well. And this is another

10:33

useful analogy that just

10:35

as, let's say when

10:37

we switch from sail to coal,

10:39

the British under Churchill was the first

10:41

sea lord and he said, right, we're

10:44

going to move to coal, and then the switch

10:46

from coal to oil. Well, as a leading

10:48

power, no leading power is going to say,

10:51

we'll just let everybody else go and get that and

10:53

hope that they give us some, they will

10:55

go and get it. And it's the same with that

10:57

low Earth orbit space, you have to

10:59

be there. And

11:00

you have to be there in numbers to be a player

11:02

and you can't wait until there's very little space

11:04

left and there's tens of thousands

11:06

of satellites will be going up over the next decade.

11:09

But if you move up even higher, geosynchronous,

11:11

this is the orbit where a satellite

11:14

moves around the Earth at the same speed that the Earth is turning.

11:17

And consequently, it's always over the same piece

11:19

of territory, which is extraordinarily good for

11:21

surveillance, also for communications and

11:23

TV and stuff. You have to

11:26

get a license from the ITU, which is a

11:28

International Telecommunications Union, a

11:30

UN

11:30

body,

11:32

they're only going to give so many licenses and it's

11:33

first come first serve. So you have to

11:35

be there. And the last bit of the analogy, let's

11:38

for example, the resources on the moon.

11:41

Well, again, there's a lot of stuff

11:43

that we need for the 21st century, lithium,

11:46

for example. And there's

11:48

helium three, which

11:50

we might be able to use as free

11:52

clean energy that's still in

11:54

progress. But if you see

11:56

your competition,

11:57

if America

11:59

or China

12:00

sees the other one going up there and having

12:02

a look at are we going to get helium-3? You

12:04

can't bet that probably never

12:06

be used. You have to go

12:08

there as well. So

12:11

does that mean we are now entering

12:13

a new race to the moon but

12:16

this time for these natural resources?

12:18

Yeah, it's this it's

12:20

three-pronged Primarily it's commercial

12:23

and getting the resources because honestly everything's

12:26

there silicon lithium and

12:28

a whole bunch of other metals I

12:30

Barely heard of some of which are called rare earth

12:32

metals Which is quite amusing because either

12:34

on the moon and be they're not that rare But

12:37

we need them for the renewable energy for

12:39

our

12:40

phones our cars for the wind

12:42

turbines, etc so it's

12:44

driven by that and then

12:46

Second tier down from that is

12:49

the launching pad to Mars There's

12:51

a massive debate in this world about

12:53

do you go via the moon or do you

12:55

go straight to Mars? And it's a huge debate and at

12:58

the moment it is being won by people that think

13:00

we go to the moon We build moon bases

13:02

in the early 2030s and From

13:05

there

13:06

you leap up to Mars because you need Incredibly

13:10

little fuel in comparison to

13:12

all that fuel you need to break through the atmosphere

13:14

of here And then the third one there

13:17

there is a military aspect to it

13:19

having a presence on the moon

13:21

will give you lines of sight

13:24

and The potential for satellites

13:26

and I personally believe Satellites

13:28

are destined to be armed For

13:31

defensive purposes only I'm sure Katie. Of

13:33

course, but so again,

13:35

it's useful to have

13:37

Get up there

13:38

and it's really on this isn't

13:40

I'm probably late to the game. This is not really accelerating.

13:43

It's been going on a few years Wherever

13:46

you are in the world

13:47

if you're interested in global affairs You can

13:49

subscribe to the new statesman in digital

13:52

in print or both from as little

13:54

as one pound a week That's twelve weeks for

13:56

just twelve pounds.

13:56

That's one euro a week in Europe

13:59

and just two dollars a week in America. Just

14:01

go to www.newstatesman.com

14:04

slash podcast offer.

14:14

Hi, I'm Anoush, and I host the New Statesman

14:17

podcast. Twice a week,

14:19

we get under the skin of Westminster to help

14:21

understand what's going on and what's going to happen

14:23

next. We interview politicians,

14:26

policymakers, and people on the front line

14:28

to get you the full story behind the headlines.

14:32

Plus, hear from our award-winning editorial team,

14:34

including political editor Andrew Marr, to

14:36

get to the bottom of what on earth is happening. Listen

14:39

to the New Statesman podcast. You can subscribe

14:41

now wherever you get your podcasts.

14:53

This Mother's Day, don't forget to celebrate

14:55

mom for everything she does with a bouquet

14:57

from 1800 flowers.com. Right

15:00

now, when you order early at 1800 flowers,

15:02

you can get $25 off two dozen assorted

15:05

roses, plus a free vase. Moms

15:07

deserve the best. So 1800 flowers

15:10

only lets the most beautiful roses make it

15:12

off their farms and to her door. Lock

15:14

in your order for guaranteed Mother's Day delivery

15:17

at 1800 flowers.com slash a cast. That's 1800 flowers.com slash

15:19

a cast.

15:23

Have you seen the cost of eggs

15:25

lately? With these prices, we'd barely

15:27

be scraping by if it weren't for Dave. What's

15:30

Dave?

15:30

It's the banking app that advances us up

15:32

to $500 instantly. There's

15:35

no interest, no late fees, or even credit

15:37

checks. No joke. We can get extra cash

15:39

for anything our family needs. Download

15:42

the Dave app or go to Dave.com. Sign

15:44

up for an extra cash account and get up to $500

15:46

instantly. For terms and conditions, go to Dave.com

15:48

slash the goal instant transfer fees apply banking

15:51

services provided by Evolve Bank and Trust. Remember,

15:53

FBI. Surgeons keep our hearts

15:55

beating.

15:56

They do the amazing help save

15:58

lives. And so can you. Your

16:00

CSL Plasma donation can help create 24

16:03

critical life-saving medicines that can give

16:05

grandpa the chance for his heart to swell when

16:07

he meets his new grandson or give a bride

16:10

the chance for her heart to skip a beat on

16:12

her wedding day. Every Plasma donation

16:14

helps more than you know. Do the

16:17

amazing. Help save lives. Donate

16:19

today at your local CSL Plasma Center

16:22

and be rewarded for your generosity.

16:33

There's been a lot of focus on the China-Russia

16:35

relationship down here on Earth, but

16:38

I was really interested to read in

16:40

the book about, for instance, joint plans

16:43

for a lunar base. Can you

16:45

explain a little bit about what's going on there?

16:47

Again, going to the geopolitics

16:50

and now astropolitics of it, it's interesting

16:53

how much it mirrors it because as

16:55

you know from this unlimited friendship that

16:57

Xi and Putin have announced,

16:59

which I think is very limited,

17:01

but there is no question in my mind that the partnership

17:04

is

17:05

solid for the time being.

17:07

China is not going to abandon Russia.

17:10

Sorry, it's another subject, but they're not

17:12

going to abandon Russia. I doubt

17:14

they will arm them to the extent that they want to

17:16

be armed. But where it mirrors it

17:18

is this reversal on

17:20

Earth, which has happened, where China

17:23

was very much the junior partner when they

17:25

were friends as communists before they fell

17:27

out. They used to say that Chinese

17:29

technology is just re-engineered Russian technology,

17:31

and it's just completely flipped.

17:34

So now on Earth, China is absolutely 100%

17:38

the senior partner in this partnership, and it's the

17:40

same in space. They are now

17:42

probably ahead of the Russians in some respects.

17:45

They are the only ones that have a space station,

17:47

a nation state

17:48

space station, the Chinese, and

17:51

they are the one that is driving,

17:53

going to the moon and building a space

17:55

with Russia, to be honest, with you tagging along.

17:58

You're right that the idea that space is

17:59

a global common is disappearing. When

18:02

you look at those kind of initiatives

18:05

of the possibility of a Chinese Russian

18:07

base on the moon,

18:09

all of these satellites

18:12

zooming around this increasingly cluttered space,

18:14

what are the rules of the road? Do

18:16

we have effective international

18:19

treaties that are governing this or

18:21

is this something our governments are working towards?

18:24

What is the situation?

18:25

Yeah, you said effective and governing

18:28

and treaties. We have one of those. We

18:31

do have treaties. We have several,

18:33

but a big one is the Outer Space Treaty in 1967. It's

18:35

effective as

18:38

long as everybody agrees with it and there's no pressure on

18:40

it. Not everybody agrees with it and now there's enormous

18:42

pressure on it. The

18:45

biggest problem with it is it was drafted in

18:48

I assume 66 and then signed

18:50

and mostly ratified in 67. For

18:53

example, it says things like we

18:56

all agree we all have weapons of mass destruction

18:58

in space. Cool, I will not

19:00

put a nuclear bomb on my satellite. Fine,

19:03

but I will put a laser on it at some point because

19:06

there's nothing in the treaty about lasers because of course

19:09

it was James Bond and now Austin Powers territory.

19:12

That's just one example of many. The second

19:15

one is the commercialization, the fact that private

19:17

enterprise is in here. Now there are paragraphs

19:20

in that treaty which you could

19:22

apply to

19:23

the private sector, but it's loose language

19:26

and so it needs to be redrawn. Everything needs

19:28

to be redrafted to take into account

19:31

the 21st century's technology, not

19:33

the 20th century's, to take into

19:35

account the commercial aspects.

19:38

That's the main thing alongside

19:41

that or incorporated into it is

19:43

the problem with the satellites. There

19:45

were very few

19:46

when that was drawn up.

19:48

Now there are no rules of the road

19:51

to say how close your satellite can be to my satellite.

19:54

If my satellite is part

19:56

of my nuclear early warning system and

19:58

your satellite is one of the ones that is got big

20:00

robotic grappling arms, and they

20:04

exist now in order to clear state space

20:06

debris, and it's approaching me, I'm getting

20:08

very nervous. Is this some sort of preemptive

20:10

thing ahead of

20:12

why are you so close to my nuclear early

20:14

warning system? So that sort of thing,

20:17

I think that's urgent. It's called

20:19

SSA, Space Situational Awareness.

20:21

And I think we urgently need to be

20:24

talking about this stuff. And obviously,

20:26

the people

20:27

who work in that industry, they know it,

20:29

but I don't think this has escaped out

20:31

into general consciousness.

20:34

And you also, you write about NATO amending

20:36

the Article 5 mutual defense

20:39

clause a couple of years back to include space,

20:42

but in very vague

20:44

terms. What do we know

20:46

about how the Alliance

20:48

thinks about space as

20:51

a theater of possible conflict? They

20:53

were, as an organization, a little late to the game.

20:55

Americans were first in with Space Command. And

20:58

now France has one, Britain has a Space Command

21:00

or Space Force, they've got various

21:02

names, India, I think has one, China,

21:05

Russia. And they're primarily

21:08

because all those countries and others have recognized

21:10

the mantra that space is a war

21:13

fighting domain.

21:14

And at the moment, it's

21:16

because you cannot fight a modern war without

21:19

access to space for a whole bunch

21:21

of reasons, surveillance, and others

21:23

and munitions guidance. And

21:26

it's played a huge role in Ukraine, the

21:28

past 14 months. But

21:32

they also have

21:33

also realized because

21:36

things have changed, and it's

21:38

not an exact example, but the Chinese

21:41

balloon recently, I've concocted, I'd

21:43

wrote an article recently where I concocted a scenario

21:45

and I know I am concocting it and it hasn't happened

21:47

and it might not, but they're useful

21:49

these scenarios.

21:59

like they smell good. Cedarwood,

22:02

lemongrass, rosemary, and peppermint,

22:04

and they have no artificial colors,

22:07

fragrances, or dyes. So

22:09

protect your pack from bugs

22:12

like ticks and fleas and mosquitoes.

22:15

Wunderside is all good. You

22:19

can get 20% off Wunderside's flea,

22:22

tick, and insect repellent line on

22:25

wonderside.com with

22:28

coupon code Sharon. That's wonder,

22:31

C-I-D-E, dot

22:33

com. And the coupon code

22:35

is Sharon.

22:41

Hello. Hello. Can

22:44

you hear me?

22:46

Podcast ads pass your brand, the

22:48

mic. So you can stop shouting from the rooftops.

22:51

And start speaking to the people who are really

22:53

listening. Give your campaign

22:55

room to be heard with podcast ads. Go

22:58

to go.acast.com

23:00

slash ads to learn more.

23:05

We live in a time of wildly conflicting

23:07

views. But one thing is for sure.

23:10

Life is good. I'm

23:12

Brian Baffini. And I believe that with

23:14

positivity, purpose, and persistence,

23:18

you can live any life you want. My

23:20

podcast, It's a Good Life, shows

23:22

you how to be good at work, good with money, good

23:24

to yourself and your family, and

23:26

ultimately how to live your best life.

23:29

Join me

23:30

and some other good folks I interview Tuesdays

23:33

and Thursdays. It's a good life.

23:40

Enter into the picture Nan

23:43

Britton, a young woman also from Marion,

23:45

Ohio, who was 30 years younger

23:48

than Harding. In 1917, Nan wrote

23:50

Warren a letter asking

23:53

him to help her find a secretarial job.

23:56

He agreed.

23:58

And they met in New York. He

24:00

was then a 52-year-old senator married

24:03

to Florence, having an affair with Carey,

24:06

and he began having an affair

24:09

with Nan, as well, who

24:11

had just turned 20. In

24:14

a tell-all book she wrote in 1927,

24:17

Nan confirmed that a number of

24:19

these trysts happened in

24:21

his Washington, D.C. Senate office.

24:24

On one such visit in January of 1919,

24:28

their daughter, Elizabeth,

24:31

was conceived. Warren

24:33

set Nan up with the place to live in New Jersey,

24:37

and in October of 1919, Nan

24:39

gave birth to his child, although

24:42

Elizabeth's paternity wouldn't

24:44

officially be recognized until almost

24:46

a hundred years later.

24:48

So what is a guy

24:50

to do when he's hiding two

24:53

extra-marital affairs and one

24:55

illegitimate daughter? The

24:58

answer is, of course, run for president,

25:00

right?

25:04

For the three years that Warren

25:06

Harding was president, he paid not

25:08

only Carey and Jim Phillips to keep silent,

25:10

but also Nan Britten. In

25:13

the weeks following his election when Nan's

25:15

sister visited him to discuss his obligations,

25:19

Warren arranged to pay Nan $500

25:21

a month in child support, and he

25:24

expected Nan's silence,

25:26

of course. Warren Harding

25:29

entered office with an additional personal payroll

25:31

of hush money payments, $75,000

25:34

a year in today's money to

25:36

one former mistress, and $7500

25:39

a month in today's money to the mother

25:42

of his secret daughter.

25:43

And we haven't forgotten about Florence,

25:46

his actual wife. Florence

25:48

continued to support Warren's ambition

25:50

to be president, but she worried about

25:53

what his candidacy would mean for

25:55

them,

25:56

and how effective he might be in the

25:58

role. She knew that

26:00

his legislative laziness and

26:03

his fondness for liquor and women

26:06

could become big problems in the most public

26:08

role in the nation.

26:11

But Florence fully supported him

26:13

reservations and all, and was quite

26:16

active throughout his campaign. Florence

26:18

marketed herself as the other half

26:20

of Warren's down home return

26:22

to normalcy persona. She regularly

26:24

spoke to the media about her skills as a housekeeper

26:27

and a cook.

26:28

But once Warren secured the win, Florence was all

26:30

business, much as she had been with their

26:32

newspaper business so many years earlier.

26:36

As for Harding,

26:37

when he entered the White House, he was wildly popular

26:40

with the American people and he pushed an

26:42

agenda of reducing taxes on corporations,

26:46

limiting immigration, and working

26:48

on the federal budget system.

26:50

To maintain his everyday

26:52

man brand, he did things

26:55

that average American men might do,

26:57

like attend sporting events and playing golf. Only

27:00

he made sure that a photographer documented

27:03

his activities. There's actually a great snapshot

27:05

of Harding at Yankee Stadium, shaking

27:07

hands with Babe Ruth.

27:09

Harding appointed four justices

27:11

to the U.S. Supreme Court, including former

27:14

President

27:15

William Howard Taft to the role of

27:17

Chief Justice. Taft is the only

27:20

former president to serve on the Supreme Court, by the

27:22

way.

27:23

Things seem to be going well for Warren. Quite

27:26

even, except for a couple of

27:28

dudes who began to misbehave. As

27:31

his common recently elected officials

27:34

reward close allies and big campaign

27:36

contributors with positions of

27:39

power. Harding's administration

27:41

was no different. He appointed loyal supporters

27:43

from his time in the Senate to his cabinet, and

27:45

collectively they were known as the Ohio

27:48

Gang. Their new jobs

27:50

put these men in proximity to large

27:53

amounts of government money, which

27:55

they, guess what, they stole. Shocking

27:58

in a shocking turn of events. They manipulated

28:01

the books and stole money. This

28:03

isn't to say that everyone Harding

28:05

appointed was corrupt, but the misconduct

28:07

and scandal of Harding's appointees reflected

28:10

badly on the entire cabinet

28:13

and on Harding, too.

28:14

President Harding reportedly said

28:16

to a newspaper editor, My friends,

28:18

they're the ones who keep me walking

28:20

the floor nights.

28:22

Future President Herbert Hoover

28:25

was appointed as the Secretary of Commerce.

28:27

He was not part of Harding's inner circle

28:29

Ohio gang and didn't really think

28:32

much of them. But in 1952,

28:34

he recalled in his memoirs, Harding

28:38

enjoyed the company of his old Ohio

28:40

associates in and out of the

28:42

government. Weekly White House

28:44

poker parties were his greatest relaxation.

28:48

The stakes were not large, but the

28:50

play lasted most of the night. I

28:52

had lived too long on the frontiers of the world

28:54

to have strong emotions against people playing poker

28:57

for money if they liked it. But it irked

28:59

me to see it in the White House.

29:03

Poker wasn't the only vice happening

29:05

at the White House. Despite the fact that

29:07

this episode is full to bursting

29:10

with affairs and scandals, this is a series about

29:12

prohibition and we need to talk about the alcohol

29:14

consumption in Warren Harding's administration.

29:19

Harding's poker cabinet,

29:21

as it was sometimes called, included

29:24

Ohio gang members like Attorney General

29:26

Harry Doherty and Secretary of War

29:28

John Weeks. There was essentially

29:31

no

29:31

such thing as temperance among these

29:33

men. At the poker parties,

29:36

often held not once but twice a week,

29:39

whiskey flowed freely. I

29:41

mean, it's much harder to take someone's money

29:43

during a card game if they're stone-cold

29:46

sober, right? And this was not done in secret.

29:48

It's not like Warren and his buddies were

29:50

hiding away in some drafty, unused

29:53

closet, quietly sipping

29:56

their outlawed alcohol. No! In

29:59

fact, the Harding's entertainment.

29:59

in the yellow room, a large

30:02

oval room with big picture windows that's located

30:04

in the residential south side of the

30:07

White House.

30:08

And I said Harding's plural

30:10

because Florence was often present too.

30:13

The late Teddy Roosevelt's oldest daughter

30:15

Alice Roosevelt Longworth was

30:17

a regular at the White House during these

30:20

parties and she claimed that the first

30:22

lady even mixed the drinks

30:24

from a vast supply of

30:27

bottles.

30:29

You want to take a guess where all this alcohol was coming

30:31

from? It was procured

30:34

by a few members of the Ohio gang,

30:37

men who had access to the Justice Department

30:40

and the alcohol that had been confiscated

30:43

by prohibition agents. They

30:45

brought in bootlegged and confiscated

30:48

liquor by the cart full.

30:50

Essentially they were drinking

30:53

the whiskey they took

30:55

from the people.

31:00

Hello, hello,

31:04

can you hear me? Podcast

31:07

ads let your message take center stage so

31:09

your brand can really cut through the noise and speak

31:11

directly to millions of listeners. Give

31:14

your campaign room to be heard with podcast

31:16

ads. Visit go.acast.com slash

31:20

ads to find out more.

31:26

By 1923 in the third year of his

31:28

first term, Warren Harding's facade

31:31

of his successful Republican president was

31:33

beginning to crumble. He

31:35

still looked the part on the surface but underneath

31:37

he was buried in scandals trying

31:40

to keep his own under wraps as

31:42

well as the

31:43

indiscretions and schemes

31:46

of his cabinet. He sought counsel

31:48

from the religious and uncorrupt Herbert Hoover

31:50

about ethically which should take precedence

31:53

the good of the party or the good of

31:55

the country. Harding's

31:58

health began to deteriorate from the

31:59

the stress, he grew gaunt and

32:02

tired easily. Nevertheless,

32:05

that summer, he and several others, including

32:07

Herbert Hoover and his wife Florence,

32:10

embarked on a 15,000 mile

32:13

cross-country trip through the West

32:15

and into the territory of Alaska. During

32:19

their journey, Harding developed such severe

32:21

chest and stomach pain that he was bedridden

32:24

by the time they finally made it to San

32:26

Francisco. He was

32:28

there, as Florence

32:29

read to him from the Saturday Evening

32:32

Post, that Warren had a heart

32:34

attack and died, three

32:36

months shy of his 58th birthday. Calvin

32:39

Coolidge was sworn in as the

32:41

30th President of the United States in

32:44

the morning of August 3, 1923.

32:48

Even after Warren's unexpected

32:51

death, all of his papers and correspondence

32:53

were boxed up and given to Florence.

32:56

Before 1978, presidential

32:58

papers were not confidential or

33:00

property of the United States. Florence

33:03

was free to do whatever she wanted with Warren's

33:05

things.

33:06

And what she wanted was to protect

33:08

him. She had an employee of Harding's

33:11

newspaper feed many of

33:13

the papers to the furnace. Although

33:16

she had been well-loved as a first

33:18

lady, Florence understood that the scandals

33:21

coming to light besmirched Warren's

33:23

presidency, and by extension, her.

33:26

Warren Harding's death shocked the nation,

33:28

and people demanded answers. When

33:31

those were not forthcoming, rumors spread.

33:34

The president's doctors were accused of malpractice

33:37

and incompetence. Florence, the last person

33:40

to see him alive, was accused of deliberately

33:42

poisoning him.

33:43

This poisoning allegation spread

33:45

like wildfire, fueled

33:47

by Florence's refusal of an autopsy

33:51

and her inheritance of his large

33:53

estate.

33:54

This theory was the premise of a book

33:56

written by a shady former FBI

33:58

agent Gaston Meade.

33:59

published in 1930, the

34:02

strange death of President Harding implies

34:05

that Florence chose to punish Warren

34:07

for his affairs by poisoning him.

34:11

It was quickly debunked, but even

34:13

today it persists

34:15

as a conspiracy theory. Florence

34:18

Cling Harding died just 16 months

34:21

after her husband. And

34:23

as the merchant of Venice tells us, the

34:26

truth will out. And

34:28

so the revelation of scandal after scandal

34:31

begin to systematically chip

34:33

away at the Harding legacy.

34:36

Attorney General Harry Doherty and his

34:38

aide Jess Smith were running a huge

34:41

scam with alcohol. Under

34:44

the Volstead Act, pharmacies were legally

34:46

allowed to buy and sell alcohol if they acquired

34:49

the appropriate permits from the government.

34:51

But Smith sold these permits

34:54

to bootleggers who in turn then

34:57

purchased and sold alcohol under the guise of

34:59

owning a pharmacy.

35:01

Smith and Doherty pocketed the money

35:03

they made selling permits. Smith

35:05

was also the White House fixer and

35:08

had his hand in a number of shady

35:10

deals.

35:11

It was also rumored that he and

35:14

Doherty were lovers. In 1923, Jess

35:17

Smith was found face down

35:20

in a garbage can with a bullet

35:23

in his head. His

35:26

death was ruled to be suicide, but

35:28

there's also a lot of robust

35:30

speculation that Jess Smith's

35:32

death was actually a homicide.

35:35

Fixer Jess Smith was the guy in charge of

35:37

paying off Harding's former mistresses

35:39

through a special fund to set aside for

35:42

blackmail. Smith also kept

35:44

a Washington Post editor, Ned McLean,

35:46

in his pocket.

35:48

Bribing him with booze and hush money to

35:50

keep damning coverage of Harding

35:52

out of the press. There's

35:54

a particularly salacious story

35:56

that has emerged in recent years about

35:59

a woman named Grace Cress.

35:59

Cross, who was Harding's aide

36:02

during his time in the Senate, they

36:04

had an affair. In a moment

36:06

of anger during their relationship, she

36:08

slashed him with a knife, which

36:10

meant that when the affair ended badly and

36:13

Warren became president, Grace

36:15

threatened to go public with their love

36:17

letters, much like Carrie had, and

36:20

she talked openly about her

36:22

ability to identify the

36:26

birthmark she'd given him with

36:28

that knife.

36:30

Fixer Jess sought

36:32

to solve the problem with the help from Grace's

36:34

friend Bertha Martin. Bertha

36:37

agreed to help on the condition that she was

36:39

given the job of society editor at

36:41

The Washington Post, and because Smith

36:43

had an N with Ned McLean there,

36:46

he made it happen. In exchange,

36:49

Bertha took her friend Grace to

36:51

lunch.

36:53

Knowing she had always kept them with her,

36:55

Bertha asked Grace if she could see the letters

36:58

that Warren had written her.

37:00

When Grace pulled them out of her purse, Bertha

37:03

snatched them away and bolted

37:05

out of the restaurant. Grace

37:09

lost her proof. Bertha became

37:11

the society editor, and President

37:13

Harding's affairs stayed

37:16

in the dark.

37:18

Jess unfortunately wound up dead.

37:21

Perhaps being a fixer meant that he knew too

37:23

much, because in addition to keeping

37:25

Harding's old flames flush

37:28

with hush money and selling permits

37:30

to bootleggers, he also had ties

37:32

to another scandal, one that you may have heard of, the

37:35

Teapot Dome scandal. During

37:38

his presidency a decade earlier, William

37:40

Howard Taft designated as

37:42

Special Naval Oil Reserve, several

37:45

oil fields located all over the country.

37:48

The

37:48

Teapot Dome oil field

37:50

in Wyoming was one of them.

37:54

In the midst of a vast, mostly

37:57

barren landscape, there was a large

37:59

rock.

37:59

formation that had once strongly

38:02

resembled a teapot which is what gave the

38:04

Valley its name.

38:06

In 1921

38:08

Interior Secretary and Ohio gang

38:10

member Albert Bacon Fall

38:13

convinced President Harding to sign

38:15

Executive Order 3474 which transferred

38:19

control of the teapot dome Naval

38:22

Oil Reserve to the Department of the

38:25

Interior.

38:26

Definitely not suspicious. Don't

38:29

be suspicious, okay? Suddenly

38:32

Interior Secretary Fall was

38:35

rolling in money. He

38:37

paid for 10 years worth of back

38:39

taxes all at one time which

38:42

a cabinet member with a decade's worth of back taxes

38:44

is a whole different scandal entirely

38:47

right? Fall purchased land

38:49

in New Mexico and made substantial

38:51

improvements to the properties he already owned. Again,

38:55

don't be suspicious. Nothing

38:57

to see here. The

38:59

scandal broke before Warren Harding's

39:02

death when the Wall Street Journal reported in 1922 that

39:05

officials in his administration

39:07

had secretly leased drilling

39:09

rights at teapot dome to the

39:11

oil magnate Harry Sinclair. It

39:15

also later came out that Interior Secretary

39:17

Fall had leased Naval

39:19

Oil fields to another

39:22

oil therein. And these leases

39:25

were worth more than 200 million

39:28

dollars. That's the equivalent of like 3 billion

39:30

dollars today? That's like by

39:32

an island kind of money, right? The

39:34

Senate decided, you

39:36

know what?

39:37

We should investigate. We should look into this. We

39:39

should look into this teapot dome situation.

39:42

Secretary Fall resigned in hopes

39:44

of quieting the reporting and

39:46

investigation. He returned

39:49

to the private sector at his ranch

39:51

in Three Rivers, New Mexico which

39:54

just so happened to have a brand new

39:56

giant influx of cattle.

39:59

covered for fall and

40:01

claimed that the leases were done with his approval.

40:05

The story faded by the summer of 1923 when

40:08

the president left on his trip west.

40:11

Additionally, the Republicans who controlled

40:13

the Senate weren't overjoyed to be pressing

40:15

too hard against one of their

40:18

own, so Democratic Senator Thomas

40:20

Walsh of Montana took the lead in the investigation,

40:23

while Senate Republicans worked on thwarting

40:26

any future probe.

40:28

The corrupt Harry Doherty,

40:30

President Harding's Attorney General, directed

40:33

federal agents to Montana to

40:35

search for information that would discredit

40:37

Senator Walsh.

40:38

And Secretary Fall

40:40

buried the Senate committee with more than 5,000

40:44

documents in order to bog down

40:46

and prolong the investigation.

40:49

The Senate hearings finally began in October

40:52

of 1923, after Warren

40:54

Harding's death. The inquiry

40:57

confirmed that Secretary Fall

40:59

had received bribes of about $400,000, which

41:02

is like $6 million today, from the oil executives

41:04

Harry Sinclair

41:09

and Edward Doheny.

41:12

What did they get for their money? Exclusive

41:14

oil production rights at several

41:17

oil fields, including Teapot

41:20

Dome. Additionally,

41:24

the source of the funds

41:26

Secretary Fall used to pay his back taxes

41:29

and improve his properties was discovered to be

41:32

a $100,000 no interest loan from

41:35

one of the oil magnets. Six

41:38

criminal trials and two civil

41:40

trials followed these congressional

41:42

hearings, and in 1929, Fall was convicted of

41:47

criminal conspiracy and bribery in

41:49

Spent.

41:50

Get this. One

41:53

year in prison for his crimes. Fall

41:58

had the honor of being the

41:59

first presidential cabinet member to be sentenced

42:02

to prison, and the Teapot Dome

42:04

scandal was the most serious

42:07

governmental scandal until Watergate 50

42:10

years later. In 1927,

42:12

the Supreme Court invalidated

42:14

the oil leases and transferred

42:17

the control of the fields back to

42:19

the Navy.

42:20

Back when the scandal was first revealed,

42:23

Attorney General Doherty and President Harding

42:25

had to work hard to rein in the scrutiny

42:28

their leadership now faced. And

42:30

who knew their most sordid

42:32

of secrets? Jess Smith.

42:35

It's reported that before he left for his

42:37

trip west, Harding told Doherty that

42:40

he wanted Jess Smith gone

42:42

from Washington, D.C.

42:45

And Jess was found dead just weeks

42:47

later.

42:48

Do we have hard evidence to say for certain

42:51

that Jess's death was planned by someone other

42:53

than himself? No, we don't. But

42:55

with an administration that was neck deep

42:58

in scandal and cover-ups, is

43:00

the idea far-fetched?

43:03

Maybe not. Let's

43:05

tie up one more loose end before

43:08

we end for today.

43:10

With Warren Harding's sudden death in 1923, Nan Britton,

43:12

once his lover and the

43:15

mother of his daughter, no longer received

43:17

her monthly stipend of $500. Nan needed money

43:20

for Elizabeth's care

43:22

and education, and so she wrote a book

43:25

and called it

43:26

The President's Daughter.

43:28

Nan spared no details

43:30

in her expose, to the point where Congress

43:33

literally introduced bills to prevent

43:35

its publication. After

43:37

that, no publisher would touch it

43:40

with the 10-foot pull.

43:41

We're talking about what if, because

43:44

if you have it,

43:45

something will happen. NATO

43:48

redrew some of its language, but

43:50

deliberately loosely, because

43:52

it clearly says, if you're in my sovereign territory

43:56

with something hostile,

43:58

this is a hostile act against a NATO.

43:59

NATO member. But we

44:02

have not defined where our sovereignty

44:04

ends horizontally. There

44:07

are different definitions of whether it's 60 miles up, 80 miles up.

44:09

But even if you were 81 miles up,

44:14

and you were using a

44:16

satellite above my

44:18

territory, 80 miles up to attack one

44:20

of my friends,

44:23

discuss.

44:25

Now, obviously, they've left it so loose

44:27

so that they don't have to get drawn

44:29

and they can take things on a case by case basis. And

44:31

the reason I mentioned the balloon was, this is

44:33

just a scenario. Supposing

44:36

by coincidence, when it was a Chinese balloon

44:39

was over the nuclear silos, which

44:41

it was in Montana,

44:42

something super secret that the Americans

44:45

were doing by coincidence and only

44:47

coincidence happened

44:48

then. And they should spotted

44:51

something that was a serious secret.

44:53

It's almost certain that balloon

44:56

had kit on it that could send

44:58

its information that it was capturing

45:00

up to a Chinese satellite and then back down

45:03

to Beijing.

45:04

Supposing the

45:07

Americans realize this, realize they

45:09

had 10 minutes

45:11

to do something or not do something.

45:14

And if they didn't do anything,

45:15

those incredibly high secrets about their nuclear

45:18

capabilities

45:19

were going to be in Beijing. Do

45:21

they shoot it down? And these

45:24

are the scenarios that military people

45:26

plan for a raft of scenarios. But

45:28

this is the sort of thing that we're now, I think we're

45:30

playing catch up.

45:32

And in that scenario, if

45:34

they do shoot it down, where does that leave

45:36

us? On

45:39

that example, when I mean, on the real

45:41

example, the Americans shot it down

45:43

over the sea for safety reasons and

45:46

over there within their 12 nautical

45:48

miles of sovereign territory. And

45:51

so under international law,

45:53

they did have the right now. The Chinese can

45:55

say force majeure, act of nature.

45:57

You shouldn't have done it

45:58

fine.

45:59

it was fairly clear cut. And I

46:02

think it would be fairly clear cut in that sense as

46:04

well, just that it would be perhaps

46:06

more, it would be taken even more

46:08

seriously than that event was. Or

46:11

let's suppose, okay, it's going to take two hours.

46:13

And by this time, it's floated out into international

46:15

waters. That makes things even more difficult

46:18

about whether I'm going to shoot it down, because that is an

46:20

act of war. If you do it in international waters, we

46:23

need to get the rules of the road

46:25

nailed down and written. I

46:27

want to ask you briefly in the time that we have left, you

46:29

have a couple of scenarios at the end of the book

46:32

outlining how this could be applied in the real world,

46:34

one of which is regarding Taiwan.

46:36

Can you

46:38

take us through how critical

46:41

satellites and this contested space

46:43

could be in that scenario?

46:45

If you were prepared

46:48

to risk a full scale war, and

46:51

that is not, I'm not saying it's likely,

46:53

but it's not exactly unthinkable

46:55

over Taiwan. Once

46:58

you take that decision, you press the

47:00

go button. One of the first things

47:02

you would do

47:03

is try to take out your opponent

47:05

satellites to blind them. And

47:08

in this pretend scenario, I come up

47:10

with they don't actually go for the mainland. In

47:13

my pretend scenario, the Chinese are

47:16

look like they're going to the mainland, the Americans

47:18

are puzzled because they haven't got enough landing ships. Everything

47:21

launches the aircraft launch and suddenly

47:23

the American satellites are taken down.

47:27

By the time they've woken up,

47:29

all the landing ships are

47:31

now returning back to shore, but

47:34

all the planes have gone down to Kinman Island,

47:36

three miles off, whatever it is off the coast

47:38

of China, the mainland,

47:40

and they've captured it and it's too late. And at that

47:43

point,

47:44

when your satellites are back up, it's

47:46

game over, you now have a choice. Oh, they

47:48

haven't invaded Taiwan, but they

47:50

have to have because it's part of it, but

47:52

it's a tiny little island.

47:54

Are we going to go to war over that? And these

47:56

are the sort of scenarios. And so I'm

47:58

pretty.

48:00

confident that sort of thing would happen without any

48:02

question in a modern warfare, if

48:04

it's all out,

48:05

you will go for your opponent's satellites, mostly

48:08

by dazzling.

48:10

But there is direct ascent, you

48:12

launch a ballistic missile from Earth and you can hit

48:14

satellites. Four countries have done it to

48:16

test it. Again, there needs to be an

48:18

ASAP ban. The Americans

48:21

have said

48:21

they will have a moratorium on testing this

48:23

stuff. Chinese and Russians won't, because

48:26

they know the American forces are vastly superior

48:29

at the moment but this is something

48:31

they have parity with them.

48:33

And so until they catch up with leg

48:35

or land, they're Earth bound forces, they

48:38

will retain the ability to fire

48:40

satellites. So that was a very long answer and you said your

48:42

final question. So

48:43

it was fascinating

48:45

and unnerving and equal amounts. One brief,

48:48

brief final question. Has grappling

48:51

with the history of humankind's

48:54

attempts to understand space,

48:56

the space race and the future of astral politics

48:59

made you more hopeful about

49:01

the

49:02

future and how we will handle

49:05

this? Or do you think we

49:07

will bring all of the same issues that we

49:09

have here on Earth to

49:11

the space realm?

49:13

I have no doubt we will do the latter.

49:16

Why wouldn't we after 12,000 years of history?

49:19

I'll try and be brief. The first time some

49:21

fella came out of a cave with a big new shiny spear.

49:24

Every year than one else, men usually said,

49:26

I want a big new shiny spear and it hasn't changed

49:29

now

49:29

and it won't change for a long time. But

49:32

we've had a very long progression towards

49:34

getting where we are and we are mostly now,

49:36

perhaps better than we used to be. And

49:39

the cooperation and science

49:41

is what has got us this far, this rationality,

49:44

because it's science

49:46

that has brought us to these amazing

49:49

peaks, which have helped all

49:51

of humanity. And I think that

49:53

trumps the negative

49:56

side of our scientific advances.

49:58

It is on the other side of the planet. onwards and upwards

50:01

with some pretty deep troughs along their way,

50:03

but it's onwards and upwards. Tim Marshall,

50:05

thank you so much for joining me today

50:07

and congratulations on a truly fantastic book.

50:12

Thank you. This has been World Review

50:14

from The New Statesman. You can read all our

50:16

international coverage on our website, newstatesman.com.

50:20

If you've enjoyed this episode, please subscribe

50:22

and leave a nice review. The producer

50:25

has been Adrienne Bradley. The team

50:27

will be back later in the week. I'm Katie

50:29

Stalard. Thanks for listening and until

50:31

next time.

50:36

Important part of the review process.

50:39

This reflection on what happened and

50:41

then you turn that around into, and now

50:43

here's how to make it better. After

50:46

those sections, I go into things that I call

50:48

my aha moments or my personal development

50:50

ideas. This is my chance to be

50:52

reflective on enhancements or improvements

50:55

or evolutionary changes I want

50:57

to make for myself, whether it's a personal

51:00

growth idea or a new business hack

51:02

or some new way to make money or a new way to

51:04

connect with people, whatever it is, doesn't

51:06

matter. It's very open ended to record

51:09

thoughts that I had that I thought were inspirational

51:12

or helpful, whether

51:13

it's from myself or someone else.

51:16

Either one's fine.

51:17

When I get to my section on what I'm grateful

51:20

for, almost every single week,

51:22

my grateful for section is

51:24

reflective of my wins for the week.

51:26

I'm usually very grateful for the things that went

51:28

well. That tends to be what happens.

51:31

I'll record in most cases my top

51:33

three wins because that's what I feel good about.

51:36

Then I have written down my top goal for the

51:38

quarter, my top goals for the month,

51:41

and I use those to then decide

51:43

upon what the top goals for next

51:45

week will be. So when all this

51:48

is put together, you know your wins, you know

51:50

your losses, you know the things you've thought

51:52

about reflected on. You also know

51:54

your current priority for the quarter and for the

51:56

month and all of that wiggles down

51:59

to your top goal.

51:59

for this week coming up and

52:02

here's how you're going to make it happen. That's

52:05

essentially the process in a nutshell. And

52:08

once again, it sounds like a lot when I say

52:10

it out loud like this, but when you do this

52:12

every single week, these things flow really

52:15

fast. You can really click through these in a way

52:17

that's just very simple, very clean,

52:19

and in a way that ultimately is extraordinarily

52:22

helpful. I can't emphasize

52:24

the benefits enough here. The clarity

52:26

that I get from this review process is astounding.

52:29

The confidence that I have in my calendar,

52:31

in my next actions, in my goals. I

52:34

can't live without this process. This

52:36

is just so important. And of course, this

52:39

actual process can change and evolve in a

52:41

thousand ways, but the core elements

52:43

are always still there. Like there is

52:45

a reason why reviewing is

52:47

important. And there's a reason why being intentional

52:50

is important.

52:51

It changes your results,

52:53

which is what we're going for. We're trying to

52:55

change our outcome, which happens

52:58

when we are intentional and reflective and

53:01

honest with ourselves and our lives.

53:03

Having said that, one of the evolutionary

53:06

changes that I have made has been

53:09

my growth into version 4.0

53:12

of the review process. And this

53:14

I'm excited about. I think if I'm correct,

53:17

I briefly mentioned one of these ideas

53:19

in the show before. Either way, we're

53:21

going to dig into now the specifics for

53:23

the changes that I've made.

53:25

There are two big ones. The

53:27

first one is I have added what

53:29

I'm calling my mid-week and

53:31

mid-month reviews. So

53:34

that

53:34

yes, technically means I have more

53:37

review systems. Let me

53:39

just back up for a second. If you

53:41

think about the life that I have crafted

53:43

and the systems that I have built and the ones that

53:46

I advertise and promote in

53:48

my book and on this show, you

53:50

might think that I spend a heck of a lot

53:52

of time doing reviews between

53:54

a weekly review, monthly, quarterly,

53:57

annual, project reports.

53:59

a lot of data and a lot of reflection

54:02

going on. Now

54:04

on the surface, it sounds like a lot, but

54:06

of course in execution, these

54:08

things don't take that much time

54:10

and they're extremely helpful.

54:12

So I'm the kind of person if I see something

54:14

is working, I double down on it

54:16

and I make sure that it's going to be as

54:18

helpful as it can be.

54:20

So having said that, when I created my

54:22

new midweek review and mid-month

54:25

reviews, all I actually

54:27

did was break apart the weekly

54:30

review and the monthly review into

54:32

two pieces.

54:33

So it's the same review process, it's

54:36

just happening in two smaller chunks.

54:39

The first chunk or the first grouping

54:41

that I have are date-specific

54:44

tasks. This is very similar

54:46

to Stephen Covey's quadrants

54:48

of philosophy. So if you know

54:50

Stephen Covey's four quadrants concept,

54:53

everything is organized between urgency

54:55

and importance and your

54:57

Q1, your Quadrant 1 tasks are

55:00

those that are both urgent and important. And

55:02

so for me, my date-specific tasks

55:05

are those that are assigned to the

55:07

weekly review and the monthly review as

55:09

they always have been.

55:11

The difference is group number two, which

55:14

I have now organized as my important

55:16

but non-urgent tasks.

55:19

These are ones that I want to make sure are going

55:21

to get done on a weekly basis or monthly

55:23

basis, but they're ones that are kind

55:25

of flexible in their dates. So

55:28

let's break this down section by section

55:30

here. So in the weekly review, the thing

55:32

we just discussed in detail, for

55:35

the most part, my intention here

55:37

is to focus on things that are both urgent

55:39

and important. I review last week's

55:41

progress, I update progress reports, I

55:43

schedule goals for next week.

55:45

All of these things are fairly expected.

55:48

However, what I saw myself

55:51

doing, as you may have just heard, there

55:53

are quite a few things in my own custom

55:55

review process

55:56

that are not date-specific. They're not

55:59

actually due.

55:59

at any time at all, I have

56:02

just arbitrarily assigned a date to

56:04

them. So let's be very specific here.

56:07

My midweek review process, the new one

56:09

that I've created with a focus on

56:11

my Q2 tasks, my important

56:13

but non-urgent tasks,

56:15

those include

56:16

all of my tech updates, right?

56:19

Computer reboot, software updates, all

56:22

of the battery charges, all of that,

56:25

those can happen basically any time. I don't

56:27

have to do those on Sunday evening

56:29

before Monday begins. I

56:31

just have to do them at some point.

56:34

Likewise the same thing is true for the household

56:36

chores, the same thing is true for my

56:39

fitness plan

56:40

and the same thing is true for the random miscellaneous

56:42

tasks that need to be reviewed or completed

56:45

on a weekly basis or somewhere

56:47

close to that. It's a pretty open

56:49

ended section, a pretty open ended concept

56:52

to just ask the question, if I was

56:55

to have an ideal set of routines

56:57

and habits and systems that will

56:59

allow me to focus on what's due now,

57:01

what's due on a specific date, a specific

57:04

time, what's make sure that's scheduled,

57:07

but then a bunch of other stuff that I would love

57:09

in an ideal way would love

57:11

to see completed, but they're not due?

57:14

When do you do them?

57:15

This has been my issue for a long time in

57:18

productivity in general. How do

57:20

I arbitrarily prioritize

57:22

something that doesn't have a due

57:24

date?

57:25

For a lot of people these things just never

57:28

happen or they just happen at the very last

57:30

second when things are actually falling apart

57:33

and they should have been done way before then.

57:35

I want to prevent chaos. I

57:38

want to make sure I have systems that are

57:40

going to function all the time.

57:42

So as a simple example, if I want my

57:44

computer to operate at the

57:46

highest level that it can so I can record

57:48

my podcast and do all of my tech work. Well,

57:51

I can't have my computer filled with viruses

57:53

and junk and old files and the hard

57:55

drive is maxed out and the computer

57:58

is 10 years old and it's too slow to function. I don't

58:01

live like that. I would never allow myself

58:03

to get there because I know how important

58:06

my tech is. So I take really

58:08

good care of it. But it's never due.

58:10

There's no specific date to do it. So

58:13

you need to arbitrarily but intentionally

58:15

decide when these things will take place.

58:18

And what I have realized is a midweek review,

58:20

well it's a great time for me to

58:23

organize and prioritize these types of

58:25

tasks. So now on Wednesday

58:27

mornings, that is my new midweek

58:30

review process. And it takes literally 30

58:32

minutes, 45 minutes and I'm done. Which

58:35

then makes my weekly review process on Sunday

58:38

evenings super fast. Really

58:41

and right to the point. I can really ask

58:43

myself what is going to happen this

58:45

coming week. Let's get to it. No

58:48

distractions. No other smaller

58:51

tiny tasks might get in the way. Let's

58:53

get to what matters and do it now. And

58:56

speaking of that, the monthly review and the

58:58

new midmonth review process are

59:00

set up in the exact same way. So

59:02

for my typical monthly review, I will have

59:05

in the same sense a quadrant

59:07

one task or set of tasks, which are

59:09

things that are both urgent and important, which

59:11

includes reviewing last month's

59:13

progress, reflecting on how to

59:15

improve and then scheduling goals for the

59:18

month coming up. So that's fairly

59:20

expected and that would happen around the

59:22

first of the month. Typically a first or second

59:24

for me in that sense. Well then I

59:27

have this whole list of tasks to do for the

59:29

midmonth review, which typically is scheduled

59:31

around the 15th of the month, usually in the middle

59:33

somewhere, which is the exact same

59:36

thing. Quadrant two tasks then show

59:38

up and that includes tech updates,

59:41

website updates, financial updates

59:43

and random miscellaneous tasks that

59:45

have to be done on a monthly basis, give

59:48

or take a few days or a few weeks. Once

59:50

again, very open, very flexible,

59:53

lots of options here.

59:55

There's a ton of ways to organize what would

59:57

be considered a midmonth review based

1:00:19

The

1:02:00

checklist is digital. It's accessible

1:02:02

from all my devices. Everything is

1:02:04

there This makes the

1:02:07

system extremely simple

1:02:09

and easy to update easy to change

1:02:11

easy to evolve

1:02:13

And you can see how this review process

1:02:15

for the week for the month the quarter of the year

1:02:18

all of its related all of it Is

1:02:20

so much more synchronized

1:02:22

in a way that it wasn't before

1:02:24

and I love it I just I love the fact this is

1:02:26

there because it gives me that that peace

1:02:28

of mind

1:02:30

To know that anything that I care

1:02:32

about can be addressed

1:02:34

on a recurring basis I don't have to remember

1:02:36

or panic or be you know, regretful

1:02:39

of mistakes I've made just put it in the checklist

1:02:41

and do it That's really all

1:02:44

it is is and this could include everything

1:02:46

from like checking the batteries in your smoke

1:02:48

detectors To changing your air filters

1:02:50

to whatever it is You're in charge

1:02:53

of that you want to do all of those things

1:02:55

can be in these checklists Every single

1:02:58

random little thing that maybe you just

1:03:00

kind of like haphazardly get to whatever you

1:03:02

feel like it or remember No, forget

1:03:04

all that forget forgetting

1:03:07

and just have it all in the system I'm

1:03:09

telling you this is a game changer. If

1:03:11

you don't have your life organized in this way,

1:03:14

you will love this

1:03:22

You

1:03:25

Have you ever experienced that awful

1:03:27

feeling that comes from losing your important

1:03:30

data

1:03:30

Imagine your computer crashes and

1:03:33

your most important work is lost with

1:03:35

it. What do you do?

1:03:36

My recommendation is to check out my

1:03:39

sponsor back blaze back

1:03:41

blaze makes backing up and accessing

1:03:43

your data Astonishingly easy.

1:03:46

I've been a back blaze customer for years

1:03:49

and it's amazing how much better I feel

1:03:51

knowing that my computer and all of my most

1:03:53

important files and folders are safe

1:03:56

in the cloud Backblaze offers

1:03:58

unlimited computer backup for

1:04:01

Macs, PCs, and businesses starting

1:04:03

at just $7 a month. You

1:04:06

can backup documents, music, photos,

1:04:08

videos, drawings, contracts, projects,

1:04:11

literally all of your data. So

1:04:13

don't be that person that forgot to backup

1:04:16

their important files. Backblaze

1:04:18

has your back. Sign up for a free 15

1:04:21

day trial. There is no credit card required

1:04:23

when you sign up at Backblaze.com

1:04:26

slash 5am. That's

1:04:29

backblaze.com slash

1:04:31

5am.

1:04:33

Would you like to improve your daily focus?

1:04:36

Even better, wouldn't you love to supercharge

1:04:38

your mind with a simple solution that has the

1:04:41

potential to boost your learning speed? My

1:04:44

recommendation is to check out my sponsor,

1:04:46

Healthy Cell. Healthy Cell's ingestible

1:04:49

gel technology, called Microgel,

1:04:51

delivers maximum nutrient absorption, 165%

1:04:54

more than tablets. I

1:04:57

have tried quite a few of their microgels

1:05:00

and the results truly are incredible. I

1:05:02

can actually feel the difference and

1:05:04

I can replace quite a few of my own daily

1:05:06

vitamins and coffees with one

1:05:08

simple microgel pack. Healthy

1:05:11

Cell's focus and recall gel packs

1:05:13

support focus, recall, mental

1:05:16

speed, and rapid learning within 30 minutes,

1:05:19

without the jitters, plus long term

1:05:21

brain health with protective antioxidants

1:05:24

and phospholipids. Go

1:05:26

to HealthyCell.com and use promo

1:05:28

code 5AM to get 20% off

1:05:30

your first order. That's HealthyCell.com

1:05:34

to get 20% off your first order

1:05:36

with promo code 5AM. Summer

1:05:39

is on the way and this spring is the

1:05:42

best time to boost your nutrition

1:05:44

as you ramp up your fitness goals. My

1:05:47

recommendation is to check out my sponsor,

1:05:49

Factor, America's number one

1:05:52

ready to eat meal kit. It

1:05:54

can help you fuel up fast with ready

1:05:56

to eat meals delivered straight to your

1:05:59

door.

1:05:59

save time, eat well, and tackle

1:06:02

everything on your to-do list.

1:06:04

If you're too busy to cook this spring,

1:06:07

with Factor you can skip the trip

1:06:09

to the grocery store and skip the chopping,

1:06:11

prepping, and cleaning up too. Factor's

1:06:14

fresh, never frozen meals are ready

1:06:16

in just 2 minutes. So

1:06:20

all you have to do is heat and enjoy,

1:06:22

then get back outside and soak up

1:06:24

the warmer weather. Head to FactorMills.com

1:06:28

slash 5am50 and use code 5am50 to get 50%

1:06:30

off your first box. That's

1:06:36

code 5am50 at FactorMills.com

1:06:39

slash 5am50 to get 50% off your first box.

1:06:51

Now to pivot this conversation just a little

1:06:53

bit, there's one more area I

1:06:55

wanted to discuss I think relates to what I just

1:06:58

said in a very specific way, which

1:07:00

is this concept of confidently choosing

1:07:03

your next action. So at

1:07:05

the top of the show I mentioned David Allen,

1:07:07

his book Getting Things Done, and I learned

1:07:09

not only from David Allen about weekly review

1:07:11

processes, well I also learned about

1:07:14

the value of a next action.

1:07:16

That everything we do is really asking

1:07:19

the question, what's my next move? What's

1:07:21

the next thing to do? And the thing about

1:07:23

that is you can logically know what the

1:07:25

next thing to do is based upon a previous

1:07:28

list you've created. But are

1:07:30

you confident that's the right choice?

1:07:32

Do you feel good about that?

1:07:34

I asked that question because frequently

1:07:37

in my life I'll make a to-do list, I'll

1:07:39

make a checklist, I'll have a project with all

1:07:41

kinds of tasks and lists, and

1:07:43

then it'll come time to do it. On the calendar

1:07:45

today it's a Tuesday afternoon, I'm

1:07:47

now going to work on this project. Now

1:07:50

get to the list and go, uh-uh,

1:07:52

no, this is not the right set of

1:07:54

lists, this is the wrong set of tasks, this is, it

1:07:57

doesn't feel right, something's

1:07:59

wrong here.

1:08:00

And so then I'll go and I'll rehash the

1:08:02

list. I'll recreate it. I'll reorganize it. I'll

1:08:05

make it better.

1:08:06

And then I go from there.

1:08:08

So that process of

1:08:10

reevaluating my projects,

1:08:12

my tasks, the things I focus on, what

1:08:15

are my next actions? I am constantly

1:08:18

in that process of asking myself,

1:08:20

am I sure that this is the right next

1:08:23

move? Which sounds like a distracting

1:08:25

hurdle to delay the progress. But

1:08:28

what it is, is me recognizing in the

1:08:30

moment,

1:08:31

I just chose a distraction.

1:08:34

I just chose something that is not actually

1:08:36

due today. I just chose to work

1:08:38

on something that is optional, unnecessary,

1:08:41

or even silly or nonsensical.

1:08:44

Why not be more intentional? Why not go

1:08:46

do something that is the right next

1:08:49

thing to do? Now, of course, that's extremely

1:08:51

subjective. There really is no right

1:08:54

next move. There's really just your

1:08:56

best call. That's all that life

1:08:58

is, is we're making our best judgment

1:09:00

calls for the next action to take

1:09:03

to accomplish our goals, to live our lives to

1:09:05

the fullest. And there is no

1:09:07

right answer here. I wish there

1:09:09

was. In many ways, that's what I'm searching

1:09:12

for, this epic journey of mine to be

1:09:14

more productive to find that perfect day,

1:09:16

that perfect project. But of course,

1:09:19

that's just not going to happen. And

1:09:21

so my question then becomes how do I organize

1:09:23

my life in such a way that I have more confidence

1:09:26

on these decisions, that I am doing things

1:09:28

that matter? Well, one of the ways

1:09:30

I do that is I change the labeling

1:09:33

of my tasks in my task manager.

1:09:36

So inside of Nozbe, I label

1:09:38

my tasks as either red or

1:09:40

blue.

1:09:41

Red are things that are due today

1:09:44

and blue are things that are not.

1:09:46

And ideally,

1:09:48

the only things I work on are

1:09:50

due today because I have intentionally

1:09:52

chosen these things to be due for a certain

1:09:54

reason, and I'm going to do them. Now,

1:09:57

the opposite is also true.

1:09:59

ideal sense, I'm going to work on things

1:10:02

that are important, whether they're urgent

1:10:04

or not. So you could argue my blue

1:10:06

tasks are the ones that actually need my

1:10:08

attention just as much.

1:10:10

And this is the tension that I face, is

1:10:13

trying to figure out how to do it all. How

1:10:15

to do everything. I want to check all the

1:10:17

boxes. I want to complete all the tasks. But

1:10:19

of course, that's also ridiculous. I'm

1:10:22

not trying to burn myself out. I'm not trying

1:10:24

to burn you out. So what do

1:10:26

you do? How do you organize your life in a way

1:10:28

that's effective? Well, my red

1:10:30

and blue labeling, which I can do in Nozbe,

1:10:32

they're called labels, and I can actually see

1:10:34

that color on the task. And most

1:10:37

systems have something that's similar to that,

1:10:39

a way for you to indicate priority or

1:10:42

indicate if this is important or not.

1:10:44

So use your system, use the tools that are available

1:10:47

to you, but

1:10:47

be intentional with that so that on each

1:10:50

day when it starts, you can see the list

1:10:52

of tasks and hopefully

1:10:54

prioritize those.

1:10:56

Understand the value of them in

1:10:59

such a way that you will give all of your attention

1:11:01

to the things that are due today. And when that

1:11:03

list is completed, you then go on to the

1:11:05

next things. I

1:11:08

mentioned this as a strategy because for a long

1:11:10

time my tasks didn't have that sense

1:11:12

of labeling. And so if I have,

1:11:14

let's say, 10 things on the to-do list and

1:11:16

things that are not important or not

1:11:19

urgent or not that pressing

1:11:21

are on the list and listed in the exact same

1:11:23

way as things that are urgent, that are

1:11:26

important, and they look identical on

1:11:28

the list because just black and white text,

1:11:30

it looks the same,

1:11:32

but they're not the same.

1:11:33

Some things are more important than others

1:11:35

and there has to be a way to easily identify

1:11:38

what those things are. And then you give all

1:11:40

your attention to what's valuable, even

1:11:42

if it's hard,

1:11:43

even if you don't want to do it, especially

1:11:46

if it's hard, and especially if you don't

1:11:48

want to do it.

1:11:49

Those are the tasks we have to lean

1:11:51

in on. That's where the progress happens.

1:11:54

That's where the confidence and the emotional release

1:11:57

takes place. Where you feel that sense

1:11:59

of joy.

1:11:59

because you did the right thing. That's

1:12:02

what I'm trying to get to every single day. How

1:12:04

do I know what matters and how do I do

1:12:07

what matters?

1:12:08

Now this same strategy can be applied to your calendar

1:12:10

as well. All of my meetings

1:12:12

on my calendar, the things that I have basically

1:12:15

agreed to do and that happen in a

1:12:17

certain day at a certain time, these things must

1:12:19

happen, they're all labeled as

1:12:21

the color red, the same color

1:12:24

that I have in my task manager as things

1:12:26

that are due today. And because

1:12:28

they're scheduled for that day at that time, they

1:12:30

are due today. Those meetings and events

1:12:33

are happening.

1:12:34

So they're red. And then everything

1:12:37

else, at least

1:12:38

to a certain degree, you have a lot of color coding going on,

1:12:41

but the other work items are in blue because

1:12:43

they're important but not urgent. They

1:12:46

are things that are a great use of my time,

1:12:48

but they're not required or necessarily need

1:12:50

to happen in that certain block.

1:12:53

So this is pretty flexible. There's a lot of ways to

1:12:55

navigate this, but the intention behind

1:12:57

it is to be intentional,

1:12:59

is to know what matters, to do what

1:13:01

matters and have a system that reflects

1:13:04

that level of prioritization in

1:13:06

an intentional way.

1:13:07

And if that happens,

1:13:09

you're gonna get a lot more done, especially

1:13:11

of the things that mean something. Now,

1:13:14

the second strategy to improve

1:13:16

your confidence to choose your next action

1:13:19

is to increase your focus by,

1:13:21

this is not a shocking statement,

1:13:24

getting things out of sight, out

1:13:26

of mind.

1:13:28

This is a concept that I have doubled

1:13:30

down on, tripled down on in the last

1:13:32

few weeks. Let's go back to that

1:13:34

whole Google Drive project management

1:13:36

overhaul that I've had recently. The

1:13:39

entire point of that system,

1:13:41

besides consolidation, which was very

1:13:43

helpful and digital access, of

1:13:46

course important, but the real underlying

1:13:48

point of the system

1:13:50

was to archive things. It was to get

1:13:52

things away from my field of vision.

1:13:54

It was to make sure that if things didn't matter, they

1:13:57

were either deleted

1:13:58

or they were hidden from. you.

1:14:01

In order to focus, we have to see

1:14:03

what matters and ignore the rest. So

1:14:06

our goal is to spend as much of our time

1:14:08

as possible working on things that matter,

1:14:11

but that means we cannot see the distractions.

1:14:13

We cannot allow them in. This is why

1:14:16

I love focus blocks of time because they're intentionally

1:14:18

guarded around your time, your energy,

1:14:21

your physical space. The intention

1:14:23

behind focus is not focus.

1:14:26

It's to prevent distraction.

1:14:28

That's all it is. And so if you

1:14:30

can get things out of sight, out of mind,

1:14:33

well, then they're not there. They don't

1:14:35

exist to distract you.

1:14:37

So in my digital system, my file

1:14:39

management, project management, task management

1:14:42

systems, if it doesn't matter,

1:14:44

I have

1:14:45

hidden it. I've put it away. I've

1:14:47

archived it. It is gone.

1:14:49

And the more of that that I do,

1:14:51

the more that the only thing I see

1:14:54

is the next thing to do. It's the next

1:14:56

project that needs my attention. And that's

1:14:59

it. And the rest is just intelligently

1:15:01

organized, archived and put away. And

1:15:03

I can access it if I need to,

1:15:05

but I'm not going to see it on an ongoing

1:15:07

basis.

1:15:09

There's a lot to be said about how to do this with your

1:15:11

own system. I may in the future

1:15:14

actually break this down with more specifics as to

1:15:16

the actual folder structure that I have. But

1:15:18

just note that there's a lot of ways to do this

1:15:21

and you probably have a pretty good idea where to start,

1:15:24

which is basically take anything you're not working

1:15:26

on, put it in a folder called archive

1:15:28

and put it away.

1:15:30

It can be that easy,

1:15:31

but this process to get anything

1:15:34

in your life, physical, digital, doesn't

1:15:36

matter. If it's not important right now,

1:15:38

move it, hide it, get rid of

1:15:41

it. Super helpful.

1:15:43

And the final strategy to improve

1:15:45

your confidence on the things that matter

1:15:48

the most to you, to know what your next action

1:15:50

is going to be,

1:15:51

is to write everything down. And

1:15:54

that seems so obvious, except

1:15:56

the fact that you may wonder, well, how does writing

1:15:58

things down make me. more confidence

1:16:01

in my decision.

1:16:02

What I have seen to be true is that most

1:16:04

of the things that I am uncertain of, fearful

1:16:07

of, have concerns about, or am

1:16:10

wondering about.

1:16:11

Almost all of that is mental.

1:16:14

I'm thinking about those things. I'm worrying

1:16:16

in my head about those things. But

1:16:19

when the simple act of writing that down

1:16:21

happens, I record that thought, record

1:16:24

the idea, I put it in Nozbe, I put

1:16:26

it on paper and pen, write it down. Well

1:16:29

all of a sudden it's not as confusing

1:16:31

anymore. It's not as fearful or fear

1:16:33

inducing.

1:16:34

It's just a thought that's now black and white

1:16:37

on paper or digitally recorded

1:16:39

in a way. I can see it, I can work

1:16:41

with it, I can schedule it, I can take action

1:16:44

on it. It becomes tangible, it becomes

1:16:46

real. And so if you're looking for

1:16:48

confidence in your next action,

1:16:50

write it down

1:16:51

and then work with it and see where it goes.

1:16:54

It's an incredibly simple concept that I have

1:16:56

seen to be more important than ever.

1:16:59

Especially when things get busy, especially

1:17:01

when things get stressful, and especially

1:17:03

if I have fear, worry, concern,

1:17:06

some kind of a negative thought on something, I get

1:17:09

that negativity out of my head.

1:17:11

I get it out, I put it on paper and then I

1:17:13

work with it, I solve the problem,

1:17:16

and then I move on.

1:17:17

If you get all of your thoughts out of your head

1:17:20

and recorded somewhere, it's

1:17:21

going to change the way that you view the

1:17:24

things you do.

1:17:25

And you're going to feel a lot better about it emotionally,

1:17:27

which will then cause you to take real world

1:17:30

action and get real world results. So

1:17:34

as a final review of the episode this week,

1:17:36

the focus is on the review process.

1:17:38

So if you do not currently have one that

1:17:40

is mapped out and on your calendar every

1:17:43

week, once again you can go to JeffSanders.com

1:17:45

slash 5amclub and you can get

1:17:48

a free template there to work with. And

1:17:50

of course follow the advice I listed in the episode

1:17:52

this week and make sure that's happening once

1:17:54

a week and it's on your calendar guaranteed

1:17:57

time.

1:17:58

The second idea was to split.

1:17:59

You can split your reviews and systems into two

1:18:02

groups. The first, things that are due

1:18:04

now, and the second, things that are not

1:18:06

due now but need to happen on some

1:18:08

regular basis. So once again, your

1:18:11

mid-week review and mid-month review

1:18:13

can be extremely important in that process.

1:18:17

Third big idea, create a system

1:18:19

to write everything down. This could be

1:18:21

pen and paper at your bedside, a waterproof

1:18:24

notepad in your shower, which I've used

1:18:26

both of those in the past and still do today.

1:18:29

Create a phone app that you trust that's with you

1:18:31

wherever you go, write a system to record

1:18:34

whatever you're thinking. And then

1:18:36

finally, you want to enhance your overall

1:18:38

focus and confidence by spending

1:18:40

as much time as possible on the tasks

1:18:42

and projects that are both urgent and

1:18:45

important. The more of your life

1:18:47

that is spent on things that matter, the

1:18:49

less of your life that is spent on things that don't.

1:18:52

It really is that simple on paper, at least

1:18:54

in theory. If you can live that out and

1:18:57

execute that more often, your results

1:18:59

will be astronomically better

1:19:01

than what they are today. I promise you

1:19:03

that. This is a really, really important

1:19:06

episode because the concepts discussed

1:19:08

here can foundationally change

1:19:10

how you approach your to-do list, your calendar,

1:19:13

your projects. These concepts

1:19:16

matter. And so implement them and yes,

1:19:18

tell me about this. Once again you can email

1:19:21

me, Jeff at JeffSanders.com. I

1:19:23

would love to hear how these systems have

1:19:25

changed the way you live and work.

1:19:35

And for the action step this week. Of

1:19:38

course, go evolve and upgrade your

1:19:40

weekly review template and move up

1:19:42

to version 4.0. If you

1:19:44

want to, you can break your tasks and

1:19:47

systems into those two groups. Things

1:19:49

that are due now and things that are not. If

1:19:52

you want to lower your stress, reduce your

1:19:54

overwhelm and focus on what matters

1:19:56

more effectively than ever, this

1:19:58

is a great time to. improve your system,

1:20:01

so make your own weekly review 4.0 process

1:20:04

and see how well it works for you. JeffSanders.com

1:20:08

slash 489 is the place to go

1:20:10

with episode notes and of course subscribe

1:20:13

to or follow this podcast, an Apple podcast

1:20:15

or Spotify to never miss an episode.

1:20:18

That's all I've got for you here on the 5am Miracle

1:20:21

Podcast this week. Until next time,

1:20:23

you have the power to change your life and

1:20:25

the fun begins bright and early.

1:20:30

Go to Beadaholique.com for all of your beading supplies needs!

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features