Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
From the gas pump to the grocery store, inflation
0:03
is everywhere. Seriously,
0:06
make it stop. Thankfully, there's
0:08
one company out there that's giving you a much
0:10
needed break. It's Mint Mobile.
0:13
As the first company to sell premium wireless
0:15
service online only, Mint Mobile
0:17
lets you order from home and save a ton, with
0:19
phone plans starting at just $15 a month. All
0:23
plans come with unlimited talk and text, plus
0:25
high-speed data delivered on the nation's largest
0:27
5G network. To get your new wireless
0:29
plan for just $15 a month, and
0:31
get the plan shipped to your door for free,
0:34
go to mintmobile.com. That's
0:37
mintmobile.com. Have
0:40
you seen the cost of eggs lately? With
0:43
these prices, we'd barely be scraping
0:45
by if it weren't for Dave. What's Dave?
0:48
It's the banking app that advances us up to $500 instantly.
0:51
There's no interest, no late
0:53
fees, or even credit checks. No joke. We
0:55
can get extra cash for anything our family needs.
0:59
Download the Dave app or go to dave.com. Sign
1:01
up for an extra cash account and get up to $500 instantly.
1:04
For terms and conditions, go to dave.com. Instant
1:06
transfer fees apply. Banking services provided by
1:08
Evolve Bank & Trust, member FDIC.
1:20
Hello, I'm Katie Stallard, and you're listening
1:22
to World Review from The New Statesman, a
1:25
twice-weekly international news podcast.
1:31
Every Monday, we interview a guest for their
1:33
unique perspective and expertise. Then,
1:35
later in the week, we come together to unpack some of
1:37
the most significant stories in world affairs.
1:40
Today, I'm speaking to the journalist and author
1:43
Tim Marshall, whose books include
1:45
the international bestseller Prisoners
1:47
of Geography. We'll discuss his
1:49
new book, The Future of Geography, and why
1:52
the next Great Power contest will be
1:54
in space.
2:01
Tim, thanks for joining me. It's great to have
2:03
you on the podcast. Thank you for the
2:05
invitation. And I think in
2:07
the interest of clarity, we both should
2:10
admit that we're former colleagues in another life.
2:12
We are, yes. Listeners know
2:14
you as the internationally acclaimed bestselling
2:17
author. Tim Marshall, I first
2:19
met you many years ago where we both worked at
2:21
Sky News and where you were extraordinarily
2:24
kind and generous and encouraging to
2:27
those of us humble lowly reporters.
2:29
I particularly remember you taking me for a coffee before
2:32
I headed off to Moscow and
2:33
downloading all of your wisdom about
2:35
spheres of influence, the near abroad. Having
2:38
thoroughly embarrassed you. As true politics
2:40
and the future of geography,
2:43
space, the final frontier,
2:45
the next great geopolitical battleground,
2:48
what first drew you to look
2:50
up and to tackle this
2:53
extraordinarily complex?
2:55
I think it's fair to say subject.
2:58
It is complex, and yet at the same time,
3:00
it's less complex
3:02
the moment it hits you that, hang on a
3:04
minute, everything that's happening up there is happening down here.
3:06
And hopefully I know a couple of things
3:09
about what's happening down here and it's
3:11
being mirrored up there. And George
3:13
Orwell said that sometimes the hardest thing to
3:15
see is what's right in front of your nose. And it's
3:18
been obvious for several years, but it was
3:20
just that sort of clarity of thought that
3:22
it's the same and that therefore,
3:25
as I write about international relations,
3:28
this is simply another area
3:31
in which that is playing out. So
3:34
let's write about that because there's
3:36
a lot of very learned and much more expert
3:38
people than me writing about this,
3:41
but I didn't see a book
3:43
for the lay person, which is what I
3:46
am as well. And I was fascinated
3:48
by the subject. So on I went. So
3:52
you, you go through really the entire
3:54
of humankind's history of thinking about space,
3:57
starting I think that actually with the Big Bang.
3:59
I tell you when I start Katie, it is 0.00001 second
4:03
after the Big Bang. So
4:06
I interrupted you, but yeah, what I wanted to do was
4:09
frame our relationship as
4:11
humans with the cosmos from its
4:14
earliest times that we were conscious of it and how
4:16
we explained
4:18
things through the gods and the ghosts,
4:20
as I say, but then through a very
4:23
long journey and then accelerating
4:25
through science, a better understanding
4:28
of it is now. So I just, the beginnings of the
4:30
book frame it before we get to the politics.
4:33
If we skip through several billion
4:35
years, I wanted to really look at
4:37
the Cold War in particular as our starting
4:40
point and how that
4:42
great contest really drove
4:44
the space race of the last century. Really
4:47
accelerated it and to our,
4:50
central to our consciousness, culminating
4:53
in those incredible scenes when Neil
4:55
Armstrong actually walks
4:57
on the moon. But it
5:00
was an integral part of the Cold War and
5:03
it was, and you
5:06
know this from your previous life
5:08
in Moscow and Beijing and of course now
5:10
Washington, those two of the great
5:12
epicenters, the
5:15
current space race, but the previous
5:17
iteration was Soviets and
5:20
the Americans. And each side really
5:23
wanted to use the space race to prove
5:25
that their system was the superior system
5:28
and therefore this was the journey mankind,
5:30
humankind as we now say should take. And
5:33
in the research, I came across this clip
5:35
by Kennedy. Now
5:37
Kennedy's great space speech, the
5:39
one that's most remember is, is we don't go there
5:41
because it's easy. We go there because it's
5:43
hard because
5:45
he went on to be the mayor of Quimby and
5:47
the Simpsons, but leave that to one side. Excellent.
5:50
Flawless. Yeah. But
5:52
I found that another section in the 1962
5:55
Congress speech where he says in terms,
5:58
we need to win this. so that
6:01
people have a better,
6:02
easier decision to make when
6:04
they decide which fork in the road
6:07
humankind is going to take. He actually spelt
6:10
it out, that's what it was about. And I do think
6:12
it underpinned it. And of course there was the military aspect
6:14
to it as well. That was the underpinning.
6:17
It was the politics of the Cold War that
6:19
propelled Neil Armstrong to the surface of
6:21
the Moon.
6:23
And there was a real chance that the Soviets
6:25
would win that race. Can you give us a sense
6:27
of the context? I think what we remember, particularly
6:29
I'm speaking from the United States, is the great triumphant
6:32
small step for man on the Moon. But
6:35
actually the late 1950s, it really
6:38
looked like it might not be the US.
6:40
Yeah. Soviets were first
6:42
up with Sputnik and only a few
6:44
days later, the Americans tried
6:46
to launch their satellite to say, look,
6:49
we have parity. And it blew up on the launchpad
6:51
in the full view of the cameras and the headlines
6:54
were Flopnik and then,
6:56
I mean, they did get parity, but then the
6:58
Russians, Soviets, went ahead with Gagarin,
7:01
first human in space. And
7:03
again, the declassified materials that
7:06
the White House and others have put out
7:08
subsequently make it quite
7:10
clear that the Americans were aware that many
7:12
of their allies were looking at them and thinking,
7:14
are we backing the wrong horse in this race? It's
7:17
not that they would all Britain and France or whoever
7:19
would immediately have switched sides. But
7:22
it's a little bit similar to the situation with
7:24
Taiwan now. In
7:26
the event that Taiwan was to fall without the
7:28
Americans giving any support to Taiwan,
7:31
as every single American friend
7:33
in the region would start to think, ah,
7:35
okay. And that
7:37
was the rationale again that, and
7:40
the embassies were sending in reports back
7:42
to Washington saying, all our allies
7:45
are asking questions. How powerful
7:47
are you? Are the Soviets going to win this? And
7:50
this was clearly part of the strategic thinking.
7:53
You have a great quote,
7:55
which I'm going to ask you to replicate because I can't fully
7:57
remember the wording, but of the impact.
7:59
of reaching the moon and
8:02
what that did then for the future of the US space
8:04
program. I
8:06
think it was Tom Wolfe's quote as if
8:08
because it was great in most of his work and
8:11
forgive me if it was somebody else's but yeah he was he
8:13
wrote a long magazine article that it was one
8:16
giant leap for mankind one
8:18
knee in the groin for NASA
8:20
because understandably
8:24
Nixon looked at this looked at the cost of
8:26
it and then Apollo 12 went came
8:29
back Apollo 13 tried to go and didn't make
8:31
it but came back. Apollo 14 went Apollo 50
8:34
and he's saying what's
8:35
the point we've done that why are we
8:37
spending all this money and he pretty much pulled the plug
8:41
on the funding and they switched to
8:43
the space shuttle which was amazing
8:46
and the ISS also amazing
8:48
but that's actually the reason there's two
8:52
answers to the question why has
8:54
it taken us seven to sixty years
8:56
fifty years sorry before we're going
8:59
back because the Americans intend to be back in 2026 and
9:03
the first answer is that one is
9:05
that quote the knee in the groin
9:07
what's the point of going back but the second
9:10
one is that was fueled by
9:12
the international relations of the time this
9:14
is fueled by that as well but
9:17
by the commerce
9:18
by the race for resources
9:21
by the military space race
9:23
by the fact that the private enterprise
9:26
is now putting in gazillions
9:28
of dollars so that's reignited
9:31
it and Musk I
9:33
wouldn't say single-handedly but Musk
9:35
has vastly reduced the costs
9:38
of
9:38
breaking out of the atmosphere with
9:40
the reusable rockets the
9:42
technology of reducing the size of the satellites
9:45
to almost a Rubik's Cube certainly
9:47
a shoebox size has reduced
9:50
the cost for
9:52
second and third tier players to
9:54
actually be out there and
9:57
so it's here and now in its front and center.
10:00
So what does this mean firstly for
10:02
I think the right terminology is low Earth
10:05
orbit and how crowded
10:07
but how consequential
10:09
that sphere has become? It's
10:11
a very important sphere. And of
10:13
course, the space out there is finite because
10:16
it's a ring. And
10:18
it's prime, it's prime real estate.
10:20
It's where so many of the satellites are,
10:23
both observation, whether you name
10:25
it, that's where they are. Some of
10:28
the military early warning systems
10:30
are there as well. And this is another
10:33
useful analogy that just
10:35
as, let's say when
10:37
we switch from sail to coal,
10:39
the British under Churchill was the first
10:41
sea lord and he said, right, we're
10:44
going to move to coal, and then the switch
10:46
from coal to oil. Well, as a leading
10:48
power, no leading power is going to say,
10:51
we'll just let everybody else go and get that and
10:53
hope that they give us some, they will
10:55
go and get it. And it's the same with that
10:57
low Earth orbit space, you have to
10:59
be there. And
11:00
you have to be there in numbers to be a player
11:02
and you can't wait until there's very little space
11:04
left and there's tens of thousands
11:06
of satellites will be going up over the next decade.
11:09
But if you move up even higher, geosynchronous,
11:11
this is the orbit where a satellite
11:14
moves around the Earth at the same speed that the Earth is turning.
11:17
And consequently, it's always over the same piece
11:19
of territory, which is extraordinarily good for
11:21
surveillance, also for communications and
11:23
TV and stuff. You have to
11:26
get a license from the ITU, which is a
11:28
International Telecommunications Union, a
11:30
UN
11:30
body,
11:32
they're only going to give so many licenses and it's
11:33
first come first serve. So you have to
11:35
be there. And the last bit of the analogy, let's
11:38
for example, the resources on the moon.
11:41
Well, again, there's a lot of stuff
11:43
that we need for the 21st century, lithium,
11:46
for example. And there's
11:48
helium three, which
11:50
we might be able to use as free
11:52
clean energy that's still in
11:54
progress. But if you see
11:56
your competition,
11:57
if America
11:59
or China
12:00
sees the other one going up there and having
12:02
a look at are we going to get helium-3? You
12:04
can't bet that probably never
12:06
be used. You have to go
12:08
there as well. So
12:11
does that mean we are now entering
12:13
a new race to the moon but
12:16
this time for these natural resources?
12:18
Yeah, it's this it's
12:20
three-pronged Primarily it's commercial
12:23
and getting the resources because honestly everything's
12:26
there silicon lithium and
12:28
a whole bunch of other metals I
12:30
Barely heard of some of which are called rare earth
12:32
metals Which is quite amusing because either
12:34
on the moon and be they're not that rare But
12:37
we need them for the renewable energy for
12:39
our
12:40
phones our cars for the wind
12:42
turbines, etc so it's
12:44
driven by that and then
12:46
Second tier down from that is
12:49
the launching pad to Mars There's
12:51
a massive debate in this world about
12:53
do you go via the moon or do you
12:55
go straight to Mars? And it's a huge debate and at
12:58
the moment it is being won by people that think
13:00
we go to the moon We build moon bases
13:02
in the early 2030s and From
13:05
there
13:06
you leap up to Mars because you need Incredibly
13:10
little fuel in comparison to
13:12
all that fuel you need to break through the atmosphere
13:14
of here And then the third one there
13:17
there is a military aspect to it
13:19
having a presence on the moon
13:21
will give you lines of sight
13:24
and The potential for satellites
13:26
and I personally believe Satellites
13:28
are destined to be armed For
13:31
defensive purposes only I'm sure Katie. Of
13:33
course, but so again,
13:35
it's useful to have
13:37
Get up there
13:38
and it's really on this isn't
13:40
I'm probably late to the game. This is not really accelerating.
13:43
It's been going on a few years Wherever
13:46
you are in the world
13:47
if you're interested in global affairs You can
13:49
subscribe to the new statesman in digital
13:52
in print or both from as little
13:54
as one pound a week That's twelve weeks for
13:56
just twelve pounds.
13:56
That's one euro a week in Europe
13:59
and just two dollars a week in America. Just
14:01
go to www.newstatesman.com
14:04
slash podcast offer.
14:14
Hi, I'm Anoush, and I host the New Statesman
14:17
podcast. Twice a week,
14:19
we get under the skin of Westminster to help
14:21
understand what's going on and what's going to happen
14:23
next. We interview politicians,
14:26
policymakers, and people on the front line
14:28
to get you the full story behind the headlines.
14:32
Plus, hear from our award-winning editorial team,
14:34
including political editor Andrew Marr, to
14:36
get to the bottom of what on earth is happening. Listen
14:39
to the New Statesman podcast. You can subscribe
14:41
now wherever you get your podcasts.
14:53
This Mother's Day, don't forget to celebrate
14:55
mom for everything she does with a bouquet
14:57
from 1800 flowers.com. Right
15:00
now, when you order early at 1800 flowers,
15:02
you can get $25 off two dozen assorted
15:05
roses, plus a free vase. Moms
15:07
deserve the best. So 1800 flowers
15:10
only lets the most beautiful roses make it
15:12
off their farms and to her door. Lock
15:14
in your order for guaranteed Mother's Day delivery
15:17
at 1800 flowers.com slash a cast. That's 1800 flowers.com slash
15:19
a cast.
15:23
Have you seen the cost of eggs
15:25
lately? With these prices, we'd barely
15:27
be scraping by if it weren't for Dave. What's
15:30
Dave?
15:30
It's the banking app that advances us up
15:32
to $500 instantly. There's
15:35
no interest, no late fees, or even credit
15:37
checks. No joke. We can get extra cash
15:39
for anything our family needs. Download
15:42
the Dave app or go to Dave.com. Sign
15:44
up for an extra cash account and get up to $500
15:46
instantly. For terms and conditions, go to Dave.com
15:48
slash the goal instant transfer fees apply banking
15:51
services provided by Evolve Bank and Trust. Remember,
15:53
FBI. Surgeons keep our hearts
15:55
beating.
15:56
They do the amazing help save
15:58
lives. And so can you. Your
16:00
CSL Plasma donation can help create 24
16:03
critical life-saving medicines that can give
16:05
grandpa the chance for his heart to swell when
16:07
he meets his new grandson or give a bride
16:10
the chance for her heart to skip a beat on
16:12
her wedding day. Every Plasma donation
16:14
helps more than you know. Do the
16:17
amazing. Help save lives. Donate
16:19
today at your local CSL Plasma Center
16:22
and be rewarded for your generosity.
16:33
There's been a lot of focus on the China-Russia
16:35
relationship down here on Earth, but
16:38
I was really interested to read in
16:40
the book about, for instance, joint plans
16:43
for a lunar base. Can you
16:45
explain a little bit about what's going on there?
16:47
Again, going to the geopolitics
16:50
and now astropolitics of it, it's interesting
16:53
how much it mirrors it because as
16:55
you know from this unlimited friendship that
16:57
Xi and Putin have announced,
16:59
which I think is very limited,
17:01
but there is no question in my mind that the partnership
17:04
is
17:05
solid for the time being.
17:07
China is not going to abandon Russia.
17:10
Sorry, it's another subject, but they're not
17:12
going to abandon Russia. I doubt
17:14
they will arm them to the extent that they want to
17:16
be armed. But where it mirrors it
17:18
is this reversal on
17:20
Earth, which has happened, where China
17:23
was very much the junior partner when they
17:25
were friends as communists before they fell
17:27
out. They used to say that Chinese
17:29
technology is just re-engineered Russian technology,
17:31
and it's just completely flipped.
17:34
So now on Earth, China is absolutely 100%
17:38
the senior partner in this partnership, and it's the
17:40
same in space. They are now
17:42
probably ahead of the Russians in some respects.
17:45
They are the only ones that have a space station,
17:47
a nation state
17:48
space station, the Chinese, and
17:51
they are the one that is driving,
17:53
going to the moon and building a space
17:55
with Russia, to be honest, with you tagging along.
17:58
You're right that the idea that space is
17:59
a global common is disappearing. When
18:02
you look at those kind of initiatives
18:05
of the possibility of a Chinese Russian
18:07
base on the moon,
18:09
all of these satellites
18:12
zooming around this increasingly cluttered space,
18:14
what are the rules of the road? Do
18:16
we have effective international
18:19
treaties that are governing this or
18:21
is this something our governments are working towards?
18:24
What is the situation?
18:25
Yeah, you said effective and governing
18:28
and treaties. We have one of those. We
18:31
do have treaties. We have several,
18:33
but a big one is the Outer Space Treaty in 1967. It's
18:35
effective as
18:38
long as everybody agrees with it and there's no pressure on
18:40
it. Not everybody agrees with it and now there's enormous
18:42
pressure on it. The
18:45
biggest problem with it is it was drafted in
18:48
I assume 66 and then signed
18:50
and mostly ratified in 67. For
18:53
example, it says things like we
18:56
all agree we all have weapons of mass destruction
18:58
in space. Cool, I will not
19:00
put a nuclear bomb on my satellite. Fine,
19:03
but I will put a laser on it at some point because
19:06
there's nothing in the treaty about lasers because of course
19:09
it was James Bond and now Austin Powers territory.
19:12
That's just one example of many. The second
19:15
one is the commercialization, the fact that private
19:17
enterprise is in here. Now there are paragraphs
19:20
in that treaty which you could
19:22
apply to
19:23
the private sector, but it's loose language
19:26
and so it needs to be redrawn. Everything needs
19:28
to be redrafted to take into account
19:31
the 21st century's technology, not
19:33
the 20th century's, to take into
19:35
account the commercial aspects.
19:38
That's the main thing alongside
19:41
that or incorporated into it is
19:43
the problem with the satellites. There
19:45
were very few
19:46
when that was drawn up.
19:48
Now there are no rules of the road
19:51
to say how close your satellite can be to my satellite.
19:54
If my satellite is part
19:56
of my nuclear early warning system and
19:58
your satellite is one of the ones that is got big
20:00
robotic grappling arms, and they
20:04
exist now in order to clear state space
20:06
debris, and it's approaching me, I'm getting
20:08
very nervous. Is this some sort of preemptive
20:10
thing ahead of
20:12
why are you so close to my nuclear early
20:14
warning system? So that sort of thing,
20:17
I think that's urgent. It's called
20:19
SSA, Space Situational Awareness.
20:21
And I think we urgently need to be
20:24
talking about this stuff. And obviously,
20:26
the people
20:27
who work in that industry, they know it,
20:29
but I don't think this has escaped out
20:31
into general consciousness.
20:34
And you also, you write about NATO amending
20:36
the Article 5 mutual defense
20:39
clause a couple of years back to include space,
20:42
but in very vague
20:44
terms. What do we know
20:46
about how the Alliance
20:48
thinks about space as
20:51
a theater of possible conflict? They
20:53
were, as an organization, a little late to the game.
20:55
Americans were first in with Space Command. And
20:58
now France has one, Britain has a Space Command
21:00
or Space Force, they've got various
21:02
names, India, I think has one, China,
21:05
Russia. And they're primarily
21:08
because all those countries and others have recognized
21:10
the mantra that space is a war
21:13
fighting domain.
21:14
And at the moment, it's
21:16
because you cannot fight a modern war without
21:19
access to space for a whole bunch
21:21
of reasons, surveillance, and others
21:23
and munitions guidance. And
21:26
it's played a huge role in Ukraine, the
21:28
past 14 months. But
21:32
they also have
21:33
also realized because
21:36
things have changed, and it's
21:38
not an exact example, but the Chinese
21:41
balloon recently, I've concocted, I'd
21:43
wrote an article recently where I concocted a scenario
21:45
and I know I am concocting it and it hasn't happened
21:47
and it might not, but they're useful
21:49
these scenarios.
21:59
like they smell good. Cedarwood,
22:02
lemongrass, rosemary, and peppermint,
22:04
and they have no artificial colors,
22:07
fragrances, or dyes. So
22:09
protect your pack from bugs
22:12
like ticks and fleas and mosquitoes.
22:15
Wunderside is all good. You
22:19
can get 20% off Wunderside's flea,
22:22
tick, and insect repellent line on
22:25
wonderside.com with
22:28
coupon code Sharon. That's wonder,
22:31
C-I-D-E, dot
22:33
com. And the coupon code
22:35
is Sharon.
22:41
Hello. Hello. Can
22:44
you hear me?
22:46
Podcast ads pass your brand, the
22:48
mic. So you can stop shouting from the rooftops.
22:51
And start speaking to the people who are really
22:53
listening. Give your campaign
22:55
room to be heard with podcast ads. Go
22:58
to go.acast.com
23:00
slash ads to learn more.
23:05
We live in a time of wildly conflicting
23:07
views. But one thing is for sure.
23:10
Life is good. I'm
23:12
Brian Baffini. And I believe that with
23:14
positivity, purpose, and persistence,
23:18
you can live any life you want. My
23:20
podcast, It's a Good Life, shows
23:22
you how to be good at work, good with money, good
23:24
to yourself and your family, and
23:26
ultimately how to live your best life.
23:29
Join me
23:30
and some other good folks I interview Tuesdays
23:33
and Thursdays. It's a good life.
23:40
Enter into the picture Nan
23:43
Britton, a young woman also from Marion,
23:45
Ohio, who was 30 years younger
23:48
than Harding. In 1917, Nan wrote
23:50
Warren a letter asking
23:53
him to help her find a secretarial job.
23:56
He agreed.
23:58
And they met in New York. He
24:00
was then a 52-year-old senator married
24:03
to Florence, having an affair with Carey,
24:06
and he began having an affair
24:09
with Nan, as well, who
24:11
had just turned 20. In
24:14
a tell-all book she wrote in 1927,
24:17
Nan confirmed that a number of
24:19
these trysts happened in
24:21
his Washington, D.C. Senate office.
24:24
On one such visit in January of 1919,
24:28
their daughter, Elizabeth,
24:31
was conceived. Warren
24:33
set Nan up with the place to live in New Jersey,
24:37
and in October of 1919, Nan
24:39
gave birth to his child, although
24:42
Elizabeth's paternity wouldn't
24:44
officially be recognized until almost
24:46
a hundred years later.
24:48
So what is a guy
24:50
to do when he's hiding two
24:53
extra-marital affairs and one
24:55
illegitimate daughter? The
24:58
answer is, of course, run for president,
25:00
right?
25:04
For the three years that Warren
25:06
Harding was president, he paid not
25:08
only Carey and Jim Phillips to keep silent,
25:10
but also Nan Britten. In
25:13
the weeks following his election when Nan's
25:15
sister visited him to discuss his obligations,
25:19
Warren arranged to pay Nan $500
25:21
a month in child support, and he
25:24
expected Nan's silence,
25:26
of course. Warren Harding
25:29
entered office with an additional personal payroll
25:31
of hush money payments, $75,000
25:34
a year in today's money to
25:36
one former mistress, and $7500
25:39
a month in today's money to the mother
25:42
of his secret daughter.
25:43
And we haven't forgotten about Florence,
25:46
his actual wife. Florence
25:48
continued to support Warren's ambition
25:50
to be president, but she worried about
25:53
what his candidacy would mean for
25:55
them,
25:56
and how effective he might be in the
25:58
role. She knew that
26:00
his legislative laziness and
26:03
his fondness for liquor and women
26:06
could become big problems in the most public
26:08
role in the nation.
26:11
But Florence fully supported him
26:13
reservations and all, and was quite
26:16
active throughout his campaign. Florence
26:18
marketed herself as the other half
26:20
of Warren's down home return
26:22
to normalcy persona. She regularly
26:24
spoke to the media about her skills as a housekeeper
26:27
and a cook.
26:28
But once Warren secured the win, Florence was all
26:30
business, much as she had been with their
26:32
newspaper business so many years earlier.
26:36
As for Harding,
26:37
when he entered the White House, he was wildly popular
26:40
with the American people and he pushed an
26:42
agenda of reducing taxes on corporations,
26:46
limiting immigration, and working
26:48
on the federal budget system.
26:50
To maintain his everyday
26:52
man brand, he did things
26:55
that average American men might do,
26:57
like attend sporting events and playing golf. Only
27:00
he made sure that a photographer documented
27:03
his activities. There's actually a great snapshot
27:05
of Harding at Yankee Stadium, shaking
27:07
hands with Babe Ruth.
27:09
Harding appointed four justices
27:11
to the U.S. Supreme Court, including former
27:14
President
27:15
William Howard Taft to the role of
27:17
Chief Justice. Taft is the only
27:20
former president to serve on the Supreme Court, by the
27:22
way.
27:23
Things seem to be going well for Warren. Quite
27:26
even, except for a couple of
27:28
dudes who began to misbehave. As
27:31
his common recently elected officials
27:34
reward close allies and big campaign
27:36
contributors with positions of
27:39
power. Harding's administration
27:41
was no different. He appointed loyal supporters
27:43
from his time in the Senate to his cabinet, and
27:45
collectively they were known as the Ohio
27:48
Gang. Their new jobs
27:50
put these men in proximity to large
27:53
amounts of government money, which
27:55
they, guess what, they stole. Shocking
27:58
in a shocking turn of events. They manipulated
28:01
the books and stole money. This
28:03
isn't to say that everyone Harding
28:05
appointed was corrupt, but the misconduct
28:07
and scandal of Harding's appointees reflected
28:10
badly on the entire cabinet
28:13
and on Harding, too.
28:14
President Harding reportedly said
28:16
to a newspaper editor, My friends,
28:18
they're the ones who keep me walking
28:20
the floor nights.
28:22
Future President Herbert Hoover
28:25
was appointed as the Secretary of Commerce.
28:27
He was not part of Harding's inner circle
28:29
Ohio gang and didn't really think
28:32
much of them. But in 1952,
28:34
he recalled in his memoirs, Harding
28:38
enjoyed the company of his old Ohio
28:40
associates in and out of the
28:42
government. Weekly White House
28:44
poker parties were his greatest relaxation.
28:48
The stakes were not large, but the
28:50
play lasted most of the night. I
28:52
had lived too long on the frontiers of the world
28:54
to have strong emotions against people playing poker
28:57
for money if they liked it. But it irked
28:59
me to see it in the White House.
29:03
Poker wasn't the only vice happening
29:05
at the White House. Despite the fact that
29:07
this episode is full to bursting
29:10
with affairs and scandals, this is a series about
29:12
prohibition and we need to talk about the alcohol
29:14
consumption in Warren Harding's administration.
29:19
Harding's poker cabinet,
29:21
as it was sometimes called, included
29:24
Ohio gang members like Attorney General
29:26
Harry Doherty and Secretary of War
29:28
John Weeks. There was essentially
29:31
no
29:31
such thing as temperance among these
29:33
men. At the poker parties,
29:36
often held not once but twice a week,
29:39
whiskey flowed freely. I
29:41
mean, it's much harder to take someone's money
29:43
during a card game if they're stone-cold
29:46
sober, right? And this was not done in secret.
29:48
It's not like Warren and his buddies were
29:50
hiding away in some drafty, unused
29:53
closet, quietly sipping
29:56
their outlawed alcohol. No! In
29:59
fact, the Harding's entertainment.
29:59
in the yellow room, a large
30:02
oval room with big picture windows that's located
30:04
in the residential south side of the
30:07
White House.
30:08
And I said Harding's plural
30:10
because Florence was often present too.
30:13
The late Teddy Roosevelt's oldest daughter
30:15
Alice Roosevelt Longworth was
30:17
a regular at the White House during these
30:20
parties and she claimed that the first
30:22
lady even mixed the drinks
30:24
from a vast supply of
30:27
bottles.
30:29
You want to take a guess where all this alcohol was coming
30:31
from? It was procured
30:34
by a few members of the Ohio gang,
30:37
men who had access to the Justice Department
30:40
and the alcohol that had been confiscated
30:43
by prohibition agents. They
30:45
brought in bootlegged and confiscated
30:48
liquor by the cart full.
30:50
Essentially they were drinking
30:53
the whiskey they took
30:55
from the people.
31:00
Hello, hello,
31:04
can you hear me? Podcast
31:07
ads let your message take center stage so
31:09
your brand can really cut through the noise and speak
31:11
directly to millions of listeners. Give
31:14
your campaign room to be heard with podcast
31:16
ads. Visit go.acast.com slash
31:20
ads to find out more.
31:26
By 1923 in the third year of his
31:28
first term, Warren Harding's facade
31:31
of his successful Republican president was
31:33
beginning to crumble. He
31:35
still looked the part on the surface but underneath
31:37
he was buried in scandals trying
31:40
to keep his own under wraps as
31:42
well as the
31:43
indiscretions and schemes
31:46
of his cabinet. He sought counsel
31:48
from the religious and uncorrupt Herbert Hoover
31:50
about ethically which should take precedence
31:53
the good of the party or the good of
31:55
the country. Harding's
31:58
health began to deteriorate from the
31:59
the stress, he grew gaunt and
32:02
tired easily. Nevertheless,
32:05
that summer, he and several others, including
32:07
Herbert Hoover and his wife Florence,
32:10
embarked on a 15,000 mile
32:13
cross-country trip through the West
32:15
and into the territory of Alaska. During
32:19
their journey, Harding developed such severe
32:21
chest and stomach pain that he was bedridden
32:24
by the time they finally made it to San
32:26
Francisco. He was
32:28
there, as Florence
32:29
read to him from the Saturday Evening
32:32
Post, that Warren had a heart
32:34
attack and died, three
32:36
months shy of his 58th birthday. Calvin
32:39
Coolidge was sworn in as the
32:41
30th President of the United States in
32:44
the morning of August 3, 1923.
32:48
Even after Warren's unexpected
32:51
death, all of his papers and correspondence
32:53
were boxed up and given to Florence.
32:56
Before 1978, presidential
32:58
papers were not confidential or
33:00
property of the United States. Florence
33:03
was free to do whatever she wanted with Warren's
33:05
things.
33:06
And what she wanted was to protect
33:08
him. She had an employee of Harding's
33:11
newspaper feed many of
33:13
the papers to the furnace. Although
33:16
she had been well-loved as a first
33:18
lady, Florence understood that the scandals
33:21
coming to light besmirched Warren's
33:23
presidency, and by extension, her.
33:26
Warren Harding's death shocked the nation,
33:28
and people demanded answers. When
33:31
those were not forthcoming, rumors spread.
33:34
The president's doctors were accused of malpractice
33:37
and incompetence. Florence, the last person
33:40
to see him alive, was accused of deliberately
33:42
poisoning him.
33:43
This poisoning allegation spread
33:45
like wildfire, fueled
33:47
by Florence's refusal of an autopsy
33:51
and her inheritance of his large
33:53
estate.
33:54
This theory was the premise of a book
33:56
written by a shady former FBI
33:58
agent Gaston Meade.
33:59
published in 1930, the
34:02
strange death of President Harding implies
34:05
that Florence chose to punish Warren
34:07
for his affairs by poisoning him.
34:11
It was quickly debunked, but even
34:13
today it persists
34:15
as a conspiracy theory. Florence
34:18
Cling Harding died just 16 months
34:21
after her husband. And
34:23
as the merchant of Venice tells us, the
34:26
truth will out. And
34:28
so the revelation of scandal after scandal
34:31
begin to systematically chip
34:33
away at the Harding legacy.
34:36
Attorney General Harry Doherty and his
34:38
aide Jess Smith were running a huge
34:41
scam with alcohol. Under
34:44
the Volstead Act, pharmacies were legally
34:46
allowed to buy and sell alcohol if they acquired
34:49
the appropriate permits from the government.
34:51
But Smith sold these permits
34:54
to bootleggers who in turn then
34:57
purchased and sold alcohol under the guise of
34:59
owning a pharmacy.
35:01
Smith and Doherty pocketed the money
35:03
they made selling permits. Smith
35:05
was also the White House fixer and
35:08
had his hand in a number of shady
35:10
deals.
35:11
It was also rumored that he and
35:14
Doherty were lovers. In 1923, Jess
35:17
Smith was found face down
35:20
in a garbage can with a bullet
35:23
in his head. His
35:26
death was ruled to be suicide, but
35:28
there's also a lot of robust
35:30
speculation that Jess Smith's
35:32
death was actually a homicide.
35:35
Fixer Jess Smith was the guy in charge of
35:37
paying off Harding's former mistresses
35:39
through a special fund to set aside for
35:42
blackmail. Smith also kept
35:44
a Washington Post editor, Ned McLean,
35:46
in his pocket.
35:48
Bribing him with booze and hush money to
35:50
keep damning coverage of Harding
35:52
out of the press. There's
35:54
a particularly salacious story
35:56
that has emerged in recent years about
35:59
a woman named Grace Cress.
35:59
Cross, who was Harding's aide
36:02
during his time in the Senate, they
36:04
had an affair. In a moment
36:06
of anger during their relationship, she
36:08
slashed him with a knife, which
36:10
meant that when the affair ended badly and
36:13
Warren became president, Grace
36:15
threatened to go public with their love
36:17
letters, much like Carrie had, and
36:20
she talked openly about her
36:22
ability to identify the
36:26
birthmark she'd given him with
36:28
that knife.
36:30
Fixer Jess sought
36:32
to solve the problem with the help from Grace's
36:34
friend Bertha Martin. Bertha
36:37
agreed to help on the condition that she was
36:39
given the job of society editor at
36:41
The Washington Post, and because Smith
36:43
had an N with Ned McLean there,
36:46
he made it happen. In exchange,
36:49
Bertha took her friend Grace to
36:51
lunch.
36:53
Knowing she had always kept them with her,
36:55
Bertha asked Grace if she could see the letters
36:58
that Warren had written her.
37:00
When Grace pulled them out of her purse, Bertha
37:03
snatched them away and bolted
37:05
out of the restaurant. Grace
37:09
lost her proof. Bertha became
37:11
the society editor, and President
37:13
Harding's affairs stayed
37:16
in the dark.
37:18
Jess unfortunately wound up dead.
37:21
Perhaps being a fixer meant that he knew too
37:23
much, because in addition to keeping
37:25
Harding's old flames flush
37:28
with hush money and selling permits
37:30
to bootleggers, he also had ties
37:32
to another scandal, one that you may have heard of, the
37:35
Teapot Dome scandal. During
37:38
his presidency a decade earlier, William
37:40
Howard Taft designated as
37:42
Special Naval Oil Reserve, several
37:45
oil fields located all over the country.
37:48
The
37:48
Teapot Dome oil field
37:50
in Wyoming was one of them.
37:54
In the midst of a vast, mostly
37:57
barren landscape, there was a large
37:59
rock.
37:59
formation that had once strongly
38:02
resembled a teapot which is what gave the
38:04
Valley its name.
38:06
In 1921
38:08
Interior Secretary and Ohio gang
38:10
member Albert Bacon Fall
38:13
convinced President Harding to sign
38:15
Executive Order 3474 which transferred
38:19
control of the teapot dome Naval
38:22
Oil Reserve to the Department of the
38:25
Interior.
38:26
Definitely not suspicious. Don't
38:29
be suspicious, okay? Suddenly
38:32
Interior Secretary Fall was
38:35
rolling in money. He
38:37
paid for 10 years worth of back
38:39
taxes all at one time which
38:42
a cabinet member with a decade's worth of back taxes
38:44
is a whole different scandal entirely
38:47
right? Fall purchased land
38:49
in New Mexico and made substantial
38:51
improvements to the properties he already owned. Again,
38:55
don't be suspicious. Nothing
38:57
to see here. The
38:59
scandal broke before Warren Harding's
39:02
death when the Wall Street Journal reported in 1922 that
39:05
officials in his administration
39:07
had secretly leased drilling
39:09
rights at teapot dome to the
39:11
oil magnate Harry Sinclair. It
39:15
also later came out that Interior Secretary
39:17
Fall had leased Naval
39:19
Oil fields to another
39:22
oil therein. And these leases
39:25
were worth more than 200 million
39:28
dollars. That's the equivalent of like 3 billion
39:30
dollars today? That's like by
39:32
an island kind of money, right? The
39:34
Senate decided, you
39:36
know what?
39:37
We should investigate. We should look into this. We
39:39
should look into this teapot dome situation.
39:42
Secretary Fall resigned in hopes
39:44
of quieting the reporting and
39:46
investigation. He returned
39:49
to the private sector at his ranch
39:51
in Three Rivers, New Mexico which
39:54
just so happened to have a brand new
39:56
giant influx of cattle.
39:59
covered for fall and
40:01
claimed that the leases were done with his approval.
40:05
The story faded by the summer of 1923 when
40:08
the president left on his trip west.
40:11
Additionally, the Republicans who controlled
40:13
the Senate weren't overjoyed to be pressing
40:15
too hard against one of their
40:18
own, so Democratic Senator Thomas
40:20
Walsh of Montana took the lead in the investigation,
40:23
while Senate Republicans worked on thwarting
40:26
any future probe.
40:28
The corrupt Harry Doherty,
40:30
President Harding's Attorney General, directed
40:33
federal agents to Montana to
40:35
search for information that would discredit
40:37
Senator Walsh.
40:38
And Secretary Fall
40:40
buried the Senate committee with more than 5,000
40:44
documents in order to bog down
40:46
and prolong the investigation.
40:49
The Senate hearings finally began in October
40:52
of 1923, after Warren
40:54
Harding's death. The inquiry
40:57
confirmed that Secretary Fall
40:59
had received bribes of about $400,000, which
41:02
is like $6 million today, from the oil executives
41:04
Harry Sinclair
41:09
and Edward Doheny.
41:12
What did they get for their money? Exclusive
41:14
oil production rights at several
41:17
oil fields, including Teapot
41:20
Dome. Additionally,
41:24
the source of the funds
41:26
Secretary Fall used to pay his back taxes
41:29
and improve his properties was discovered to be
41:32
a $100,000 no interest loan from
41:35
one of the oil magnets. Six
41:38
criminal trials and two civil
41:40
trials followed these congressional
41:42
hearings, and in 1929, Fall was convicted of
41:47
criminal conspiracy and bribery in
41:49
Spent.
41:50
Get this. One
41:53
year in prison for his crimes. Fall
41:58
had the honor of being the
41:59
first presidential cabinet member to be sentenced
42:02
to prison, and the Teapot Dome
42:04
scandal was the most serious
42:07
governmental scandal until Watergate 50
42:10
years later. In 1927,
42:12
the Supreme Court invalidated
42:14
the oil leases and transferred
42:17
the control of the fields back to
42:19
the Navy.
42:20
Back when the scandal was first revealed,
42:23
Attorney General Doherty and President Harding
42:25
had to work hard to rein in the scrutiny
42:28
their leadership now faced. And
42:30
who knew their most sordid
42:32
of secrets? Jess Smith.
42:35
It's reported that before he left for his
42:37
trip west, Harding told Doherty that
42:40
he wanted Jess Smith gone
42:42
from Washington, D.C.
42:45
And Jess was found dead just weeks
42:47
later.
42:48
Do we have hard evidence to say for certain
42:51
that Jess's death was planned by someone other
42:53
than himself? No, we don't. But
42:55
with an administration that was neck deep
42:58
in scandal and cover-ups, is
43:00
the idea far-fetched?
43:03
Maybe not. Let's
43:05
tie up one more loose end before
43:08
we end for today.
43:10
With Warren Harding's sudden death in 1923, Nan Britton,
43:12
once his lover and the
43:15
mother of his daughter, no longer received
43:17
her monthly stipend of $500. Nan needed money
43:20
for Elizabeth's care
43:22
and education, and so she wrote a book
43:25
and called it
43:26
The President's Daughter.
43:28
Nan spared no details
43:30
in her expose, to the point where Congress
43:33
literally introduced bills to prevent
43:35
its publication. After
43:37
that, no publisher would touch it
43:40
with the 10-foot pull.
43:41
We're talking about what if, because
43:44
if you have it,
43:45
something will happen. NATO
43:48
redrew some of its language, but
43:50
deliberately loosely, because
43:52
it clearly says, if you're in my sovereign territory
43:56
with something hostile,
43:58
this is a hostile act against a NATO.
43:59
NATO member. But we
44:02
have not defined where our sovereignty
44:04
ends horizontally. There
44:07
are different definitions of whether it's 60 miles up, 80 miles up.
44:09
But even if you were 81 miles up,
44:14
and you were using a
44:16
satellite above my
44:18
territory, 80 miles up to attack one
44:20
of my friends,
44:23
discuss.
44:25
Now, obviously, they've left it so loose
44:27
so that they don't have to get drawn
44:29
and they can take things on a case by case basis. And
44:31
the reason I mentioned the balloon was, this is
44:33
just a scenario. Supposing
44:36
by coincidence, when it was a Chinese balloon
44:39
was over the nuclear silos, which
44:41
it was in Montana,
44:42
something super secret that the Americans
44:45
were doing by coincidence and only
44:47
coincidence happened
44:48
then. And they should spotted
44:51
something that was a serious secret.
44:53
It's almost certain that balloon
44:56
had kit on it that could send
44:58
its information that it was capturing
45:00
up to a Chinese satellite and then back down
45:03
to Beijing.
45:04
Supposing the
45:07
Americans realize this, realize they
45:09
had 10 minutes
45:11
to do something or not do something.
45:14
And if they didn't do anything,
45:15
those incredibly high secrets about their nuclear
45:18
capabilities
45:19
were going to be in Beijing. Do
45:21
they shoot it down? And these
45:24
are the scenarios that military people
45:26
plan for a raft of scenarios. But
45:28
this is the sort of thing that we're now, I think we're
45:30
playing catch up.
45:32
And in that scenario, if
45:34
they do shoot it down, where does that leave
45:36
us? On
45:39
that example, when I mean, on the real
45:41
example, the Americans shot it down
45:43
over the sea for safety reasons and
45:46
over there within their 12 nautical
45:48
miles of sovereign territory. And
45:51
so under international law,
45:53
they did have the right now. The Chinese can
45:55
say force majeure, act of nature.
45:57
You shouldn't have done it
45:58
fine.
45:59
it was fairly clear cut. And I
46:02
think it would be fairly clear cut in that sense as
46:04
well, just that it would be perhaps
46:06
more, it would be taken even more
46:08
seriously than that event was. Or
46:11
let's suppose, okay, it's going to take two hours.
46:13
And by this time, it's floated out into international
46:15
waters. That makes things even more difficult
46:18
about whether I'm going to shoot it down, because that is an
46:20
act of war. If you do it in international waters, we
46:23
need to get the rules of the road
46:25
nailed down and written. I
46:27
want to ask you briefly in the time that we have left, you
46:29
have a couple of scenarios at the end of the book
46:32
outlining how this could be applied in the real world,
46:34
one of which is regarding Taiwan.
46:36
Can you
46:38
take us through how critical
46:41
satellites and this contested space
46:43
could be in that scenario?
46:45
If you were prepared
46:48
to risk a full scale war, and
46:51
that is not, I'm not saying it's likely,
46:53
but it's not exactly unthinkable
46:55
over Taiwan. Once
46:58
you take that decision, you press the
47:00
go button. One of the first things
47:02
you would do
47:03
is try to take out your opponent
47:05
satellites to blind them. And
47:08
in this pretend scenario, I come up
47:10
with they don't actually go for the mainland. In
47:13
my pretend scenario, the Chinese are
47:16
look like they're going to the mainland, the Americans
47:18
are puzzled because they haven't got enough landing ships. Everything
47:21
launches the aircraft launch and suddenly
47:23
the American satellites are taken down.
47:27
By the time they've woken up,
47:29
all the landing ships are
47:31
now returning back to shore, but
47:34
all the planes have gone down to Kinman Island,
47:36
three miles off, whatever it is off the coast
47:38
of China, the mainland,
47:40
and they've captured it and it's too late. And at that
47:43
point,
47:44
when your satellites are back up, it's
47:46
game over, you now have a choice. Oh, they
47:48
haven't invaded Taiwan, but they
47:50
have to have because it's part of it, but
47:52
it's a tiny little island.
47:54
Are we going to go to war over that? And these
47:56
are the sort of scenarios. And so I'm
47:58
pretty.
48:00
confident that sort of thing would happen without any
48:02
question in a modern warfare, if
48:04
it's all out,
48:05
you will go for your opponent's satellites, mostly
48:08
by dazzling.
48:10
But there is direct ascent, you
48:12
launch a ballistic missile from Earth and you can hit
48:14
satellites. Four countries have done it to
48:16
test it. Again, there needs to be an
48:18
ASAP ban. The Americans
48:21
have said
48:21
they will have a moratorium on testing this
48:23
stuff. Chinese and Russians won't, because
48:26
they know the American forces are vastly superior
48:29
at the moment but this is something
48:31
they have parity with them.
48:33
And so until they catch up with leg
48:35
or land, they're Earth bound forces, they
48:38
will retain the ability to fire
48:40
satellites. So that was a very long answer and you said your
48:42
final question. So
48:43
it was fascinating
48:45
and unnerving and equal amounts. One brief,
48:48
brief final question. Has grappling
48:51
with the history of humankind's
48:54
attempts to understand space,
48:56
the space race and the future of astral politics
48:59
made you more hopeful about
49:01
the
49:02
future and how we will handle
49:05
this? Or do you think we
49:07
will bring all of the same issues that we
49:09
have here on Earth to
49:11
the space realm?
49:13
I have no doubt we will do the latter.
49:16
Why wouldn't we after 12,000 years of history?
49:19
I'll try and be brief. The first time some
49:21
fella came out of a cave with a big new shiny spear.
49:24
Every year than one else, men usually said,
49:26
I want a big new shiny spear and it hasn't changed
49:29
now
49:29
and it won't change for a long time. But
49:32
we've had a very long progression towards
49:34
getting where we are and we are mostly now,
49:36
perhaps better than we used to be. And
49:39
the cooperation and science
49:41
is what has got us this far, this rationality,
49:44
because it's science
49:46
that has brought us to these amazing
49:49
peaks, which have helped all
49:51
of humanity. And I think that
49:53
trumps the negative
49:56
side of our scientific advances.
49:58
It is on the other side of the planet. onwards and upwards
50:01
with some pretty deep troughs along their way,
50:03
but it's onwards and upwards. Tim Marshall,
50:05
thank you so much for joining me today
50:07
and congratulations on a truly fantastic book.
50:12
Thank you. This has been World Review
50:14
from The New Statesman. You can read all our
50:16
international coverage on our website, newstatesman.com.
50:20
If you've enjoyed this episode, please subscribe
50:22
and leave a nice review. The producer
50:25
has been Adrienne Bradley. The team
50:27
will be back later in the week. I'm Katie
50:29
Stalard. Thanks for listening and until
50:31
next time.
50:36
Important part of the review process.
50:39
This reflection on what happened and
50:41
then you turn that around into, and now
50:43
here's how to make it better. After
50:46
those sections, I go into things that I call
50:48
my aha moments or my personal development
50:50
ideas. This is my chance to be
50:52
reflective on enhancements or improvements
50:55
or evolutionary changes I want
50:57
to make for myself, whether it's a personal
51:00
growth idea or a new business hack
51:02
or some new way to make money or a new way to
51:04
connect with people, whatever it is, doesn't
51:06
matter. It's very open ended to record
51:09
thoughts that I had that I thought were inspirational
51:12
or helpful, whether
51:13
it's from myself or someone else.
51:16
Either one's fine.
51:17
When I get to my section on what I'm grateful
51:20
for, almost every single week,
51:22
my grateful for section is
51:24
reflective of my wins for the week.
51:26
I'm usually very grateful for the things that went
51:28
well. That tends to be what happens.
51:31
I'll record in most cases my top
51:33
three wins because that's what I feel good about.
51:36
Then I have written down my top goal for the
51:38
quarter, my top goals for the month,
51:41
and I use those to then decide
51:43
upon what the top goals for next
51:45
week will be. So when all this
51:48
is put together, you know your wins, you know
51:50
your losses, you know the things you've thought
51:52
about reflected on. You also know
51:54
your current priority for the quarter and for the
51:56
month and all of that wiggles down
51:59
to your top goal.
51:59
for this week coming up and
52:02
here's how you're going to make it happen. That's
52:05
essentially the process in a nutshell. And
52:08
once again, it sounds like a lot when I say
52:10
it out loud like this, but when you do this
52:12
every single week, these things flow really
52:15
fast. You can really click through these in a way
52:17
that's just very simple, very clean,
52:19
and in a way that ultimately is extraordinarily
52:22
helpful. I can't emphasize
52:24
the benefits enough here. The clarity
52:26
that I get from this review process is astounding.
52:29
The confidence that I have in my calendar,
52:31
in my next actions, in my goals. I
52:34
can't live without this process. This
52:36
is just so important. And of course, this
52:39
actual process can change and evolve in a
52:41
thousand ways, but the core elements
52:43
are always still there. Like there is
52:45
a reason why reviewing is
52:47
important. And there's a reason why being intentional
52:50
is important.
52:51
It changes your results,
52:53
which is what we're going for. We're trying to
52:55
change our outcome, which happens
52:58
when we are intentional and reflective and
53:01
honest with ourselves and our lives.
53:03
Having said that, one of the evolutionary
53:06
changes that I have made has been
53:09
my growth into version 4.0
53:12
of the review process. And this
53:14
I'm excited about. I think if I'm correct,
53:17
I briefly mentioned one of these ideas
53:19
in the show before. Either way, we're
53:21
going to dig into now the specifics for
53:23
the changes that I've made.
53:25
There are two big ones. The
53:27
first one is I have added what
53:29
I'm calling my mid-week and
53:31
mid-month reviews. So
53:34
that
53:34
yes, technically means I have more
53:37
review systems. Let me
53:39
just back up for a second. If you
53:41
think about the life that I have crafted
53:43
and the systems that I have built and the ones that
53:46
I advertise and promote in
53:48
my book and on this show, you
53:50
might think that I spend a heck of a lot
53:52
of time doing reviews between
53:54
a weekly review, monthly, quarterly,
53:57
annual, project reports.
53:59
a lot of data and a lot of reflection
54:02
going on. Now
54:04
on the surface, it sounds like a lot, but
54:06
of course in execution, these
54:08
things don't take that much time
54:10
and they're extremely helpful.
54:12
So I'm the kind of person if I see something
54:14
is working, I double down on it
54:16
and I make sure that it's going to be as
54:18
helpful as it can be.
54:20
So having said that, when I created my
54:22
new midweek review and mid-month
54:25
reviews, all I actually
54:27
did was break apart the weekly
54:30
review and the monthly review into
54:32
two pieces.
54:33
So it's the same review process, it's
54:36
just happening in two smaller chunks.
54:39
The first chunk or the first grouping
54:41
that I have are date-specific
54:44
tasks. This is very similar
54:46
to Stephen Covey's quadrants
54:48
of philosophy. So if you know
54:50
Stephen Covey's four quadrants concept,
54:53
everything is organized between urgency
54:55
and importance and your
54:57
Q1, your Quadrant 1 tasks are
55:00
those that are both urgent and important. And
55:02
so for me, my date-specific tasks
55:05
are those that are assigned to the
55:07
weekly review and the monthly review as
55:09
they always have been.
55:11
The difference is group number two, which
55:14
I have now organized as my important
55:16
but non-urgent tasks.
55:19
These are ones that I want to make sure are going
55:21
to get done on a weekly basis or monthly
55:23
basis, but they're ones that are kind
55:25
of flexible in their dates. So
55:28
let's break this down section by section
55:30
here. So in the weekly review, the thing
55:32
we just discussed in detail, for
55:35
the most part, my intention here
55:37
is to focus on things that are both urgent
55:39
and important. I review last week's
55:41
progress, I update progress reports, I
55:43
schedule goals for next week.
55:45
All of these things are fairly expected.
55:48
However, what I saw myself
55:51
doing, as you may have just heard, there
55:53
are quite a few things in my own custom
55:55
review process
55:56
that are not date-specific. They're not
55:59
actually due.
55:59
at any time at all, I have
56:02
just arbitrarily assigned a date to
56:04
them. So let's be very specific here.
56:07
My midweek review process, the new one
56:09
that I've created with a focus on
56:11
my Q2 tasks, my important
56:13
but non-urgent tasks,
56:15
those include
56:16
all of my tech updates, right?
56:19
Computer reboot, software updates, all
56:22
of the battery charges, all of that,
56:25
those can happen basically any time. I don't
56:27
have to do those on Sunday evening
56:29
before Monday begins. I
56:31
just have to do them at some point.
56:34
Likewise the same thing is true for the household
56:36
chores, the same thing is true for my
56:39
fitness plan
56:40
and the same thing is true for the random miscellaneous
56:42
tasks that need to be reviewed or completed
56:45
on a weekly basis or somewhere
56:47
close to that. It's a pretty open
56:49
ended section, a pretty open ended concept
56:52
to just ask the question, if I was
56:55
to have an ideal set of routines
56:57
and habits and systems that will
56:59
allow me to focus on what's due now,
57:01
what's due on a specific date, a specific
57:04
time, what's make sure that's scheduled,
57:07
but then a bunch of other stuff that I would love
57:09
in an ideal way would love
57:11
to see completed, but they're not due?
57:14
When do you do them?
57:15
This has been my issue for a long time in
57:18
productivity in general. How do
57:20
I arbitrarily prioritize
57:22
something that doesn't have a due
57:24
date?
57:25
For a lot of people these things just never
57:28
happen or they just happen at the very last
57:30
second when things are actually falling apart
57:33
and they should have been done way before then.
57:35
I want to prevent chaos. I
57:38
want to make sure I have systems that are
57:40
going to function all the time.
57:42
So as a simple example, if I want my
57:44
computer to operate at the
57:46
highest level that it can so I can record
57:48
my podcast and do all of my tech work. Well,
57:51
I can't have my computer filled with viruses
57:53
and junk and old files and the hard
57:55
drive is maxed out and the computer
57:58
is 10 years old and it's too slow to function. I don't
58:01
live like that. I would never allow myself
58:03
to get there because I know how important
58:06
my tech is. So I take really
58:08
good care of it. But it's never due.
58:10
There's no specific date to do it. So
58:13
you need to arbitrarily but intentionally
58:15
decide when these things will take place.
58:18
And what I have realized is a midweek review,
58:20
well it's a great time for me to
58:23
organize and prioritize these types of
58:25
tasks. So now on Wednesday
58:27
mornings, that is my new midweek
58:30
review process. And it takes literally 30
58:32
minutes, 45 minutes and I'm done. Which
58:35
then makes my weekly review process on Sunday
58:38
evenings super fast. Really
58:41
and right to the point. I can really ask
58:43
myself what is going to happen this
58:45
coming week. Let's get to it. No
58:48
distractions. No other smaller
58:51
tiny tasks might get in the way. Let's
58:53
get to what matters and do it now. And
58:56
speaking of that, the monthly review and the
58:58
new midmonth review process are
59:00
set up in the exact same way. So
59:02
for my typical monthly review, I will have
59:05
in the same sense a quadrant
59:07
one task or set of tasks, which are
59:09
things that are both urgent and important, which
59:11
includes reviewing last month's
59:13
progress, reflecting on how to
59:15
improve and then scheduling goals for the
59:18
month coming up. So that's fairly
59:20
expected and that would happen around the
59:22
first of the month. Typically a first or second
59:24
for me in that sense. Well then I
59:27
have this whole list of tasks to do for the
59:29
midmonth review, which typically is scheduled
59:31
around the 15th of the month, usually in the middle
59:33
somewhere, which is the exact same
59:36
thing. Quadrant two tasks then show
59:38
up and that includes tech updates,
59:41
website updates, financial updates
59:43
and random miscellaneous tasks that
59:45
have to be done on a monthly basis, give
59:48
or take a few days or a few weeks. Once
59:50
again, very open, very flexible,
59:53
lots of options here.
59:55
There's a ton of ways to organize what would
59:57
be considered a midmonth review based
1:00:19
The
1:02:00
checklist is digital. It's accessible
1:02:02
from all my devices. Everything is
1:02:04
there This makes the
1:02:07
system extremely simple
1:02:09
and easy to update easy to change
1:02:11
easy to evolve
1:02:13
And you can see how this review process
1:02:15
for the week for the month the quarter of the year
1:02:18
all of its related all of it Is
1:02:20
so much more synchronized
1:02:22
in a way that it wasn't before
1:02:24
and I love it I just I love the fact this is
1:02:26
there because it gives me that that peace
1:02:28
of mind
1:02:30
To know that anything that I care
1:02:32
about can be addressed
1:02:34
on a recurring basis I don't have to remember
1:02:36
or panic or be you know, regretful
1:02:39
of mistakes I've made just put it in the checklist
1:02:41
and do it That's really all
1:02:44
it is is and this could include everything
1:02:46
from like checking the batteries in your smoke
1:02:48
detectors To changing your air filters
1:02:50
to whatever it is You're in charge
1:02:53
of that you want to do all of those things
1:02:55
can be in these checklists Every single
1:02:58
random little thing that maybe you just
1:03:00
kind of like haphazardly get to whatever you
1:03:02
feel like it or remember No, forget
1:03:04
all that forget forgetting
1:03:07
and just have it all in the system I'm
1:03:09
telling you this is a game changer. If
1:03:11
you don't have your life organized in this way,
1:03:14
you will love this
1:03:22
You
1:03:25
Have you ever experienced that awful
1:03:27
feeling that comes from losing your important
1:03:30
data
1:03:30
Imagine your computer crashes and
1:03:33
your most important work is lost with
1:03:35
it. What do you do?
1:03:36
My recommendation is to check out my
1:03:39
sponsor back blaze back
1:03:41
blaze makes backing up and accessing
1:03:43
your data Astonishingly easy.
1:03:46
I've been a back blaze customer for years
1:03:49
and it's amazing how much better I feel
1:03:51
knowing that my computer and all of my most
1:03:53
important files and folders are safe
1:03:56
in the cloud Backblaze offers
1:03:58
unlimited computer backup for
1:04:01
Macs, PCs, and businesses starting
1:04:03
at just $7 a month. You
1:04:06
can backup documents, music, photos,
1:04:08
videos, drawings, contracts, projects,
1:04:11
literally all of your data. So
1:04:13
don't be that person that forgot to backup
1:04:16
their important files. Backblaze
1:04:18
has your back. Sign up for a free 15
1:04:21
day trial. There is no credit card required
1:04:23
when you sign up at Backblaze.com
1:04:26
slash 5am. That's
1:04:29
backblaze.com slash
1:04:31
5am.
1:04:33
Would you like to improve your daily focus?
1:04:36
Even better, wouldn't you love to supercharge
1:04:38
your mind with a simple solution that has the
1:04:41
potential to boost your learning speed? My
1:04:44
recommendation is to check out my sponsor,
1:04:46
Healthy Cell. Healthy Cell's ingestible
1:04:49
gel technology, called Microgel,
1:04:51
delivers maximum nutrient absorption, 165%
1:04:54
more than tablets. I
1:04:57
have tried quite a few of their microgels
1:05:00
and the results truly are incredible. I
1:05:02
can actually feel the difference and
1:05:04
I can replace quite a few of my own daily
1:05:06
vitamins and coffees with one
1:05:08
simple microgel pack. Healthy
1:05:11
Cell's focus and recall gel packs
1:05:13
support focus, recall, mental
1:05:16
speed, and rapid learning within 30 minutes,
1:05:19
without the jitters, plus long term
1:05:21
brain health with protective antioxidants
1:05:24
and phospholipids. Go
1:05:26
to HealthyCell.com and use promo
1:05:28
code 5AM to get 20% off
1:05:30
your first order. That's HealthyCell.com
1:05:34
to get 20% off your first order
1:05:36
with promo code 5AM. Summer
1:05:39
is on the way and this spring is the
1:05:42
best time to boost your nutrition
1:05:44
as you ramp up your fitness goals. My
1:05:47
recommendation is to check out my sponsor,
1:05:49
Factor, America's number one
1:05:52
ready to eat meal kit. It
1:05:54
can help you fuel up fast with ready
1:05:56
to eat meals delivered straight to your
1:05:59
door.
1:05:59
save time, eat well, and tackle
1:06:02
everything on your to-do list.
1:06:04
If you're too busy to cook this spring,
1:06:07
with Factor you can skip the trip
1:06:09
to the grocery store and skip the chopping,
1:06:11
prepping, and cleaning up too. Factor's
1:06:14
fresh, never frozen meals are ready
1:06:16
in just 2 minutes. So
1:06:20
all you have to do is heat and enjoy,
1:06:22
then get back outside and soak up
1:06:24
the warmer weather. Head to FactorMills.com
1:06:28
slash 5am50 and use code 5am50 to get 50%
1:06:30
off your first box. That's
1:06:36
code 5am50 at FactorMills.com
1:06:39
slash 5am50 to get 50% off your first box.
1:06:51
Now to pivot this conversation just a little
1:06:53
bit, there's one more area I
1:06:55
wanted to discuss I think relates to what I just
1:06:58
said in a very specific way, which
1:07:00
is this concept of confidently choosing
1:07:03
your next action. So at
1:07:05
the top of the show I mentioned David Allen,
1:07:07
his book Getting Things Done, and I learned
1:07:09
not only from David Allen about weekly review
1:07:11
processes, well I also learned about
1:07:14
the value of a next action.
1:07:16
That everything we do is really asking
1:07:19
the question, what's my next move? What's
1:07:21
the next thing to do? And the thing about
1:07:23
that is you can logically know what the
1:07:25
next thing to do is based upon a previous
1:07:28
list you've created. But are
1:07:30
you confident that's the right choice?
1:07:32
Do you feel good about that?
1:07:34
I asked that question because frequently
1:07:37
in my life I'll make a to-do list, I'll
1:07:39
make a checklist, I'll have a project with all
1:07:41
kinds of tasks and lists, and
1:07:43
then it'll come time to do it. On the calendar
1:07:45
today it's a Tuesday afternoon, I'm
1:07:47
now going to work on this project. Now
1:07:50
get to the list and go, uh-uh,
1:07:52
no, this is not the right set of
1:07:54
lists, this is the wrong set of tasks, this is, it
1:07:57
doesn't feel right, something's
1:07:59
wrong here.
1:08:00
And so then I'll go and I'll rehash the
1:08:02
list. I'll recreate it. I'll reorganize it. I'll
1:08:05
make it better.
1:08:06
And then I go from there.
1:08:08
So that process of
1:08:10
reevaluating my projects,
1:08:12
my tasks, the things I focus on, what
1:08:15
are my next actions? I am constantly
1:08:18
in that process of asking myself,
1:08:20
am I sure that this is the right next
1:08:23
move? Which sounds like a distracting
1:08:25
hurdle to delay the progress. But
1:08:28
what it is, is me recognizing in the
1:08:30
moment,
1:08:31
I just chose a distraction.
1:08:34
I just chose something that is not actually
1:08:36
due today. I just chose to work
1:08:38
on something that is optional, unnecessary,
1:08:41
or even silly or nonsensical.
1:08:44
Why not be more intentional? Why not go
1:08:46
do something that is the right next
1:08:49
thing to do? Now, of course, that's extremely
1:08:51
subjective. There really is no right
1:08:54
next move. There's really just your
1:08:56
best call. That's all that life
1:08:58
is, is we're making our best judgment
1:09:00
calls for the next action to take
1:09:03
to accomplish our goals, to live our lives to
1:09:05
the fullest. And there is no
1:09:07
right answer here. I wish there
1:09:09
was. In many ways, that's what I'm searching
1:09:12
for, this epic journey of mine to be
1:09:14
more productive to find that perfect day,
1:09:16
that perfect project. But of course,
1:09:19
that's just not going to happen. And
1:09:21
so my question then becomes how do I organize
1:09:23
my life in such a way that I have more confidence
1:09:26
on these decisions, that I am doing things
1:09:28
that matter? Well, one of the ways
1:09:30
I do that is I change the labeling
1:09:33
of my tasks in my task manager.
1:09:36
So inside of Nozbe, I label
1:09:38
my tasks as either red or
1:09:40
blue.
1:09:41
Red are things that are due today
1:09:44
and blue are things that are not.
1:09:46
And ideally,
1:09:48
the only things I work on are
1:09:50
due today because I have intentionally
1:09:52
chosen these things to be due for a certain
1:09:54
reason, and I'm going to do them. Now,
1:09:57
the opposite is also true.
1:09:59
ideal sense, I'm going to work on things
1:10:02
that are important, whether they're urgent
1:10:04
or not. So you could argue my blue
1:10:06
tasks are the ones that actually need my
1:10:08
attention just as much.
1:10:10
And this is the tension that I face, is
1:10:13
trying to figure out how to do it all. How
1:10:15
to do everything. I want to check all the
1:10:17
boxes. I want to complete all the tasks. But
1:10:19
of course, that's also ridiculous. I'm
1:10:22
not trying to burn myself out. I'm not trying
1:10:24
to burn you out. So what do
1:10:26
you do? How do you organize your life in a way
1:10:28
that's effective? Well, my red
1:10:30
and blue labeling, which I can do in Nozbe,
1:10:32
they're called labels, and I can actually see
1:10:34
that color on the task. And most
1:10:37
systems have something that's similar to that,
1:10:39
a way for you to indicate priority or
1:10:42
indicate if this is important or not.
1:10:44
So use your system, use the tools that are available
1:10:47
to you, but
1:10:47
be intentional with that so that on each
1:10:50
day when it starts, you can see the list
1:10:52
of tasks and hopefully
1:10:54
prioritize those.
1:10:56
Understand the value of them in
1:10:59
such a way that you will give all of your attention
1:11:01
to the things that are due today. And when that
1:11:03
list is completed, you then go on to the
1:11:05
next things. I
1:11:08
mentioned this as a strategy because for a long
1:11:10
time my tasks didn't have that sense
1:11:12
of labeling. And so if I have,
1:11:14
let's say, 10 things on the to-do list and
1:11:16
things that are not important or not
1:11:19
urgent or not that pressing
1:11:21
are on the list and listed in the exact same
1:11:23
way as things that are urgent, that are
1:11:26
important, and they look identical on
1:11:28
the list because just black and white text,
1:11:30
it looks the same,
1:11:32
but they're not the same.
1:11:33
Some things are more important than others
1:11:35
and there has to be a way to easily identify
1:11:38
what those things are. And then you give all
1:11:40
your attention to what's valuable, even
1:11:42
if it's hard,
1:11:43
even if you don't want to do it, especially
1:11:46
if it's hard, and especially if you don't
1:11:48
want to do it.
1:11:49
Those are the tasks we have to lean
1:11:51
in on. That's where the progress happens.
1:11:54
That's where the confidence and the emotional release
1:11:57
takes place. Where you feel that sense
1:11:59
of joy.
1:11:59
because you did the right thing. That's
1:12:02
what I'm trying to get to every single day. How
1:12:04
do I know what matters and how do I do
1:12:07
what matters?
1:12:08
Now this same strategy can be applied to your calendar
1:12:10
as well. All of my meetings
1:12:12
on my calendar, the things that I have basically
1:12:15
agreed to do and that happen in a
1:12:17
certain day at a certain time, these things must
1:12:19
happen, they're all labeled as
1:12:21
the color red, the same color
1:12:24
that I have in my task manager as things
1:12:26
that are due today. And because
1:12:28
they're scheduled for that day at that time, they
1:12:30
are due today. Those meetings and events
1:12:33
are happening.
1:12:34
So they're red. And then everything
1:12:37
else, at least
1:12:38
to a certain degree, you have a lot of color coding going on,
1:12:41
but the other work items are in blue because
1:12:43
they're important but not urgent. They
1:12:46
are things that are a great use of my time,
1:12:48
but they're not required or necessarily need
1:12:50
to happen in that certain block.
1:12:53
So this is pretty flexible. There's a lot of ways to
1:12:55
navigate this, but the intention behind
1:12:57
it is to be intentional,
1:12:59
is to know what matters, to do what
1:13:01
matters and have a system that reflects
1:13:04
that level of prioritization in
1:13:06
an intentional way.
1:13:07
And if that happens,
1:13:09
you're gonna get a lot more done, especially
1:13:11
of the things that mean something. Now,
1:13:14
the second strategy to improve
1:13:16
your confidence to choose your next action
1:13:19
is to increase your focus by,
1:13:21
this is not a shocking statement,
1:13:24
getting things out of sight, out
1:13:26
of mind.
1:13:28
This is a concept that I have doubled
1:13:30
down on, tripled down on in the last
1:13:32
few weeks. Let's go back to that
1:13:34
whole Google Drive project management
1:13:36
overhaul that I've had recently. The
1:13:39
entire point of that system,
1:13:41
besides consolidation, which was very
1:13:43
helpful and digital access, of
1:13:46
course important, but the real underlying
1:13:48
point of the system
1:13:50
was to archive things. It was to get
1:13:52
things away from my field of vision.
1:13:54
It was to make sure that if things didn't matter, they
1:13:57
were either deleted
1:13:58
or they were hidden from. you.
1:14:01
In order to focus, we have to see
1:14:03
what matters and ignore the rest. So
1:14:06
our goal is to spend as much of our time
1:14:08
as possible working on things that matter,
1:14:11
but that means we cannot see the distractions.
1:14:13
We cannot allow them in. This is why
1:14:16
I love focus blocks of time because they're intentionally
1:14:18
guarded around your time, your energy,
1:14:21
your physical space. The intention
1:14:23
behind focus is not focus.
1:14:26
It's to prevent distraction.
1:14:28
That's all it is. And so if you
1:14:30
can get things out of sight, out of mind,
1:14:33
well, then they're not there. They don't
1:14:35
exist to distract you.
1:14:37
So in my digital system, my file
1:14:39
management, project management, task management
1:14:42
systems, if it doesn't matter,
1:14:44
I have
1:14:45
hidden it. I've put it away. I've
1:14:47
archived it. It is gone.
1:14:49
And the more of that that I do,
1:14:51
the more that the only thing I see
1:14:54
is the next thing to do. It's the next
1:14:56
project that needs my attention. And that's
1:14:59
it. And the rest is just intelligently
1:15:01
organized, archived and put away. And
1:15:03
I can access it if I need to,
1:15:05
but I'm not going to see it on an ongoing
1:15:07
basis.
1:15:09
There's a lot to be said about how to do this with your
1:15:11
own system. I may in the future
1:15:14
actually break this down with more specifics as to
1:15:16
the actual folder structure that I have. But
1:15:18
just note that there's a lot of ways to do this
1:15:21
and you probably have a pretty good idea where to start,
1:15:24
which is basically take anything you're not working
1:15:26
on, put it in a folder called archive
1:15:28
and put it away.
1:15:30
It can be that easy,
1:15:31
but this process to get anything
1:15:34
in your life, physical, digital, doesn't
1:15:36
matter. If it's not important right now,
1:15:38
move it, hide it, get rid of
1:15:41
it. Super helpful.
1:15:43
And the final strategy to improve
1:15:45
your confidence on the things that matter
1:15:48
the most to you, to know what your next action
1:15:50
is going to be,
1:15:51
is to write everything down. And
1:15:54
that seems so obvious, except
1:15:56
the fact that you may wonder, well, how does writing
1:15:58
things down make me. more confidence
1:16:01
in my decision.
1:16:02
What I have seen to be true is that most
1:16:04
of the things that I am uncertain of, fearful
1:16:07
of, have concerns about, or am
1:16:10
wondering about.
1:16:11
Almost all of that is mental.
1:16:14
I'm thinking about those things. I'm worrying
1:16:16
in my head about those things. But
1:16:19
when the simple act of writing that down
1:16:21
happens, I record that thought, record
1:16:24
the idea, I put it in Nozbe, I put
1:16:26
it on paper and pen, write it down. Well
1:16:29
all of a sudden it's not as confusing
1:16:31
anymore. It's not as fearful or fear
1:16:33
inducing.
1:16:34
It's just a thought that's now black and white
1:16:37
on paper or digitally recorded
1:16:39
in a way. I can see it, I can work
1:16:41
with it, I can schedule it, I can take action
1:16:44
on it. It becomes tangible, it becomes
1:16:46
real. And so if you're looking for
1:16:48
confidence in your next action,
1:16:50
write it down
1:16:51
and then work with it and see where it goes.
1:16:54
It's an incredibly simple concept that I have
1:16:56
seen to be more important than ever.
1:16:59
Especially when things get busy, especially
1:17:01
when things get stressful, and especially
1:17:03
if I have fear, worry, concern,
1:17:06
some kind of a negative thought on something, I get
1:17:09
that negativity out of my head.
1:17:11
I get it out, I put it on paper and then I
1:17:13
work with it, I solve the problem,
1:17:16
and then I move on.
1:17:17
If you get all of your thoughts out of your head
1:17:20
and recorded somewhere, it's
1:17:21
going to change the way that you view the
1:17:24
things you do.
1:17:25
And you're going to feel a lot better about it emotionally,
1:17:27
which will then cause you to take real world
1:17:30
action and get real world results. So
1:17:34
as a final review of the episode this week,
1:17:36
the focus is on the review process.
1:17:38
So if you do not currently have one that
1:17:40
is mapped out and on your calendar every
1:17:43
week, once again you can go to JeffSanders.com
1:17:45
slash 5amclub and you can get
1:17:48
a free template there to work with. And
1:17:50
of course follow the advice I listed in the episode
1:17:52
this week and make sure that's happening once
1:17:54
a week and it's on your calendar guaranteed
1:17:57
time.
1:17:58
The second idea was to split.
1:17:59
You can split your reviews and systems into two
1:18:02
groups. The first, things that are due
1:18:04
now, and the second, things that are not
1:18:06
due now but need to happen on some
1:18:08
regular basis. So once again, your
1:18:11
mid-week review and mid-month review
1:18:13
can be extremely important in that process.
1:18:17
Third big idea, create a system
1:18:19
to write everything down. This could be
1:18:21
pen and paper at your bedside, a waterproof
1:18:24
notepad in your shower, which I've used
1:18:26
both of those in the past and still do today.
1:18:29
Create a phone app that you trust that's with you
1:18:31
wherever you go, write a system to record
1:18:34
whatever you're thinking. And then
1:18:36
finally, you want to enhance your overall
1:18:38
focus and confidence by spending
1:18:40
as much time as possible on the tasks
1:18:42
and projects that are both urgent and
1:18:45
important. The more of your life
1:18:47
that is spent on things that matter, the
1:18:49
less of your life that is spent on things that don't.
1:18:52
It really is that simple on paper, at least
1:18:54
in theory. If you can live that out and
1:18:57
execute that more often, your results
1:18:59
will be astronomically better
1:19:01
than what they are today. I promise you
1:19:03
that. This is a really, really important
1:19:06
episode because the concepts discussed
1:19:08
here can foundationally change
1:19:10
how you approach your to-do list, your calendar,
1:19:13
your projects. These concepts
1:19:16
matter. And so implement them and yes,
1:19:18
tell me about this. Once again you can email
1:19:21
me, Jeff at JeffSanders.com. I
1:19:23
would love to hear how these systems have
1:19:25
changed the way you live and work.
1:19:35
And for the action step this week. Of
1:19:38
course, go evolve and upgrade your
1:19:40
weekly review template and move up
1:19:42
to version 4.0. If you
1:19:44
want to, you can break your tasks and
1:19:47
systems into those two groups. Things
1:19:49
that are due now and things that are not. If
1:19:52
you want to lower your stress, reduce your
1:19:54
overwhelm and focus on what matters
1:19:56
more effectively than ever, this
1:19:58
is a great time to. improve your system,
1:20:01
so make your own weekly review 4.0 process
1:20:04
and see how well it works for you. JeffSanders.com
1:20:08
slash 489 is the place to go
1:20:10
with episode notes and of course subscribe
1:20:13
to or follow this podcast, an Apple podcast
1:20:15
or Spotify to never miss an episode.
1:20:18
That's all I've got for you here on the 5am Miracle
1:20:21
Podcast this week. Until next time,
1:20:23
you have the power to change your life and
1:20:25
the fun begins bright and early.
1:20:30
Go to Beadaholique.com for all of your beading supplies needs!
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More