Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Released Wednesday, 29th July 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Talking UBI and Human Centered Economy with Congressional Candidate, David Kim

Wednesday, 29th July 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Welcome to Worst Year Ever, a production

0:02

of My Heart Radio Together

0:13

everything, So don't why

0:20

Hello, Welcome back to

0:23

the Worst Year Ever. My name

0:25

is Katie Still, that's wild. My

0:27

name isn't. I've got a different one and it is Cody

0:29

Johnston. Uh. Today we

0:31

are recording without Robert because

0:34

he needed the week off like I needed it

0:36

off last week. And that's just how we

0:38

roll sometimes. UM. Sophie's

0:40

here though, that's quite never leave, she

0:43

doesn't. UM. Today we

0:45

have something special for you, guys, and

0:48

that is an interview with David

0:50

Kim, who is running for California's

0:53

thirty four district. Uh.

0:55

He is wonderful. We

0:58

just had a very interesting

1:01

conversation with him about U B I, about

1:04

human centered economy UM,

1:07

and just challenging the

1:09

establishment and I

1:12

I found it inspiring. UM.

1:15

I think I won't speak for you guys.

1:17

Hey, I don't disagree. He doesn't

1:20

disagree. That's different than our

1:22

catchphrase on even

1:24

More News, which I don't disagree with you completely.

1:29

Yeah, it was great. It was a great conversation. UM,

1:32

and you're gonna listen to it. You're gonna

1:34

listen to it right now.

1:38

So today we are very

1:40

excited to be joined by

1:42

David Kim, who is running for California's

1:44

thirty four congressional district.

1:47

Hi David, Hi Katie,

1:49

thank you so much for having me. Oh, we're thrilled

1:52

to have you. How are you doing

1:54

We'll start off with an easy one. Maybe

1:57

that's not an easy question. Actually that's

1:59

hard to die Agraham and dissect. Yeah,

2:02

yeah, no, I'm I'm doing fine. I'm very grateful.

2:05

Um, definitely very one of the few fortunate

2:07

ones that get to work from

2:10

home and then also campaign as well.

2:12

So yeah, I'm very fortunate, and I think

2:14

right now the focus is just too how do

2:17

we help each other? How do we

2:19

do this in the short term immediately

2:21

right now, but then how do we do this long term

2:24

where we're not out doing our government and

2:26

helping each other? Yeah, um,

2:29

I want to I want to hear

2:31

a little bit about your background and

2:34

you know, how you decided to run

2:36

for office. I'm also curious

2:38

to know what campaigning

2:41

is like right now. You know,

2:44

we don't have the same traditional methods

2:46

of going out necessarily, I

2:48

think, and if you guys are going door to door

2:51

or anything like that. But yeah,

2:53

because that was a lot of questions wrapped into one

2:56

question background,

2:58

how did you decide to run? What does campaign?

3:01

So just like, what's up? How's it going? Yeah?

3:04

What's up? How's it going? So? Yeah? So my

3:06

name is David. I am currently an immigration

3:08

attorney. I live here in CD

3:11

thirty four. I moved to Los Angeles

3:13

in two thousand ten. I've lived

3:15

here for the past ten years. When

3:17

I graduated from law school, I started working at the

3:19

d a's office at l A County,

3:22

UH, and then the county went

3:24

on a firing hiring freeze,

3:26

and so I started working in labor

3:28

and employment litigation on the plaintiff side.

3:31

So I would sue employers for unpaid

3:34

wages, sexual harassment, those

3:36

types of cases. And shortly

3:38

thereafter, I then moved into the entertainment industry

3:41

because I felt that there was a need um

3:43

as a lot of my friends at the times who

3:46

were and even now, um,

3:48

I mean there's a lot less now, but back then there were a

3:50

lot of writer friends, director friends, acting

3:52

friends just being charged so

3:55

much with excessive high attorney

3:57

fees and so they would

3:59

be paying several thousand dollars

4:01

and retainers then get charged a percentage

4:04

and then be afraid to talk to them on the phone,

4:06

so they would ask me for help and I'm

4:09

and I'm a labor unemployment I mean, although

4:11

there are overlapping areas, I found

4:13

myself doing a lot of their legal counsel

4:15

work for free, which which is fine for me

4:17

and helping them, but it's like, why

4:19

are you afraid to talk to your a

4:21

thousand dollar in our attorneys, Like you should

4:23

be demanding them to do stuff

4:25

for you, but obviously they can't because

4:27

of the money and everything involved with that. So I

4:30

felt that there was a need there, so I

4:32

created the Hollywood Lawyer dot Com in

4:35

two thousand, fourteen October just

4:37

to fill in the need for Hey, we can't

4:39

be taking money

4:41

and taking an advantage of our creatives

4:44

because they gave up everything

4:46

to to do creative stuff for us

4:48

to be the thought thought provokers, to be the

4:51

thought creators, and we can't

4:53

be taking advantage of that. And so I saw a need

4:55

for creating affordable legal services

4:57

for a creative niche um serve

5:00

uses. And at the time, you

5:02

really couldn't get an attorney just to look

5:04

over a contract before you had to sign

5:06

it three days later or the next day. You

5:08

had to have paid a two thousand dollar retainer

5:10

first and then book them on appointment,

5:13

and so it's very inaccessible for

5:15

a lot of creatives. And so we filled

5:17

that void of creating flat fee services,

5:20

of providing very affordable flat

5:23

fee rates, contingency rates, uh,

5:26

and just kind of on the ghost things that you

5:28

can just really need, whether it be hey, I

5:30

need a red line written review of all

5:32

the things that need to be changing my contract. Can you give

5:34

me that in the next four eight hours. Yes, we can.

5:36

We'll help you. Do you want an oral consultation

5:38

on top of that, Okay, let's do it. So it's

5:40

it was making these services more affordable

5:42

and more accessible because a lot of our creatives

5:45

are being taken advantage of signing away

5:47

their rights, um signing away their options

5:49

without getting any value for that.

5:52

And so we did that, or I did that for

5:54

about four or five years. Um I sold

5:57

the Hollywood lawyer. At the time, there wasn't

5:59

any type of legal practice that

6:01

that was like ours. And so now you have Counsel

6:03

for Creators and all of these other smaller legal practices

6:06

that are that are providing those services. And so I

6:09

felt, Okay, I think I've reached my

6:11

time here in the industry, so

6:13

UM. To be honest, I I kind of wanted

6:16

to see what it was like to be on the other side. So

6:18

I applied to Sony Pictures

6:20

to be one of its legal counsels.

6:23

I ended up after so many

6:25

interviews, I ended up getting a job there director

6:27

of music Acquisitions for legal Um.

6:30

I spent my nine months there. If I

6:32

had stayed what several more

6:34

years, I could probablyly now start to pay

6:36

off my two thousand of law school loans

6:38

that I haven't been able to pay off for all

6:40

these years because I've I've, like

6:43

most of my I've I've I've worked that daily

6:45

grind and hustle life of working two to three

6:48

jobs. I remember there were so many days

6:50

where I'd worked free as an attorney and then drive

6:52

for Lift and Uber from seven pm to

6:54

three am every day, and

6:56

so so now it was like, yes, David,

6:59

like a sane mind would tell you

7:01

to just stay at Sony, don't quit

7:03

your job, and just pay off your law school

7:05

loans and do it. But in the reality

7:07

of my neighborhood and where I live, the

7:10

average rent here for one bedroom apartment

7:12

is two thousand a month, but the per capita income

7:14

is fifteen and so when you

7:16

have families living to to a bedroom

7:19

apartment, it's like, okay, I

7:21

I felt like I was living in two completely different

7:23

worlds, um kind

7:25

of. And it was just this,

7:27

this overall realization.

7:30

And this had started building up ever since I had

7:32

helped out on Kenneth Mahia's campaign in two thou

7:34

eighteen. So that's where I was really

7:36

activised politically because

7:38

I had missed the two thousand sixteen Bernie Our

7:41

Revolution moment. And so during

7:43

all of this time and these deeper realizations,

7:45

I thought, holy sh it, Like life isn't

7:47

supposed to be this hard or tough for anybody,

7:50

Like the struggle shouldn't be this real, Like

7:52

what's going on? Like we shouldn't be working

7:54

for the all of our lives until the last day

7:57

that we breathe. Like that's not what life

7:59

is supposed to be like. And so it hit me

8:01

on a deeper level. Um And during

8:03

all of this time while doing the Hollywood Lawyer, while

8:06

working at Sony, I was also a local neighborhood

8:08

council board member of MacArthur

8:10

Park Neighborhood Council. Although

8:12

um it could have a lot more power. It's at least

8:15

something that we as a community members as residents

8:17

can hold onto. Yeah, I wish

8:20

the neighborhood council system could do a lot

8:22

more. And so for those who are listening, Los

8:24

Angeles has ninety nine neighborhood councils,

8:26

and each neighborhood council serves forty residents.

8:29

And so what we have the power to do is to give

8:32

our opinion on any zoning

8:34

projects that come in any um

8:36

and so in a way we're able to stop

8:38

gentrification as much as possible so that

8:40

our community members aren't displaced and

8:43

so um. And so the

8:45

neighborhood council system allows us to actually

8:47

have a say to cling onto whatever

8:49

status quo is. Although we're not fond of

8:51

status quo. At least this is what

8:53

we know because we don't know if something worse is

8:55

going to come, because we've seen our families

8:58

and neighbors move an

9:00

hour or two hours away leaving Los

9:02

Angeles. And that's not the city that we

9:04

need to become. Because if we really

9:06

prioritize the people and find solutions

9:08

that actually work, then we can

9:10

all still be intact, still keep our community

9:13

safe. Um. But it's a matter of what

9:15

are our communities needs and concerns, And right

9:18

now, our communities are so financially

9:20

distressed. We have a thirty five plus year

9:23

income wage stagnation, ever

9:25

increasing widening wealth gap. We

9:27

have people that pre COVID

9:30

nineteen had two to three jobs to make ends

9:32

meet, and currently they have no jobs to make

9:34

ends meet, and they have no health insurance. And

9:36

yet are elected officials continue

9:39

to preach this message of oh,

9:41

universal health care. Oh now we're going to take

9:43

it out. Oh yeah, our d NC platform just

9:45

voted to not prioritize Medicare for all anymore

9:48

because we're not in that moment anymore. When

9:50

when we're all more ever in that

9:52

moment because nobody has health insurance.

9:55

And so so when you see like these

9:57

elected officials just preaching, oh,

9:59

well, we'll give you medicare for all or

10:01

health care for all, but then they're taking money from

10:03

pharmaceutical companies, healthcare companies.

10:06

They're saying free education for all, but then they're

10:08

taking money from student decollectors. In

10:10

a way, it's like, how crazy are we

10:13

to continue reelecting the same

10:15

officials two years after

10:17

two years after two years, it's like I

10:19

think it's on us now to realize, and it's

10:22

not in an accusatory or judgmental way,

10:24

but it's more of a hey, like they

10:27

they actually work for us, And it's kind of

10:29

really waking up and bringing out

10:31

that true perspective of they

10:33

actually work for us,

10:36

and if their job is to represent

10:39

the will of the people and they're

10:41

not doing it, all right, let's

10:43

vote for somebody else. And so that's why I'm

10:45

running. Yeah, which is actually very interesting

10:48

in terms of the trajectory of your career

10:50

that you've just laid out, because it's exactly what

10:52

you were doing with Hollywood. I mean, these

10:55

lawyers that you're talking about that

10:58

people were afraid to, you

11:00

know, push for the you know, push

11:03

back on the money issues and all of that stuff.

11:05

That they're supposed to work for people. But the system is

11:07

broken, or you may guess

11:10

that's the system is designed, how it's designed to work.

11:12

But like, you know, showing an alternative

11:15

path and what

11:17

you're everything you're saying really resonates with

11:19

me. I've been talking about this a lot

11:21

with people in my conversations. You

11:24

know, it's easy to say

11:26

to fall into this US versus them

11:28

mentality left versus right,

11:31

and sure I've got lots of complaints

11:33

about the right, but also

11:36

we need

11:38

to step up, we need to be accountable,

11:40

We need to try harder and keep pushing for

11:43

UH officials that actually

11:46

worked for us, as you're saying, because just

11:49

saying get the Democrat

11:51

in isn't cutting it. The

11:53

democrats, so many democrats,

11:56

the system, the establishment UM

11:59

is serving the same systems that

12:01

aren't working, you know, and they're they're ingrained.

12:04

So that's why I'm so so thrilled to

12:06

have candidates like you stepping up and

12:08

and talking about some

12:10

really dramatic, drastic things that need

12:12

to happen to actually be serving

12:15

the communities. UM.

12:19

You're running on a very progressive platform,

12:22

which is very exciting to us, even

12:24

endorsed by Andrew Yang and Marian Williamson.

12:26

Am I right, UM

12:29

your supporter of U B I met a care for all

12:31

green, new Deal homes guarantee

12:34

UM. And and I'd love to have

12:36

you walk us through some of

12:38

these issues and and

12:40

and talk about how you arrived on these

12:42

positions and everything, UM,

12:45

because we could start with you b I. It's it's

12:47

not a new concept, but it's it's

12:49

relatively new to many Americans. I think,

12:52

you know, Andrew Yang's campaign brought

12:54

it to the forefront of our conversations

12:57

this election cycle. Um.

12:59

And of course he exited the race before

13:02

the pandemic hit. But

13:04

now I think we're having these conversations under a new

13:06

lens. Um. You know, many

13:09

people have been pushing for U B I as something as

13:11

a response to the pandemic, and

13:14

and what we got was far short the

13:16

U b I um or,

13:19

you know, but now more than ever, something

13:21

like this is imperative

13:25

and were and when Andrew brought that up

13:27

during his campaign, people laughed at him, and now

13:30

everybody and now everybody's like, hm, hmmm,

13:32

what about that? But

13:34

could you I mean,

13:37

I think a lot of our listeners have a fairly good

13:39

grasp on UBI, but I'd love to have you walk

13:41

us through it. Um. I. Also,

13:43

I'm hoping that we all can have a takeaway

13:46

of of easy ways that we can talk

13:48

about it with our relatives and loved ones, you

13:50

know, moving forward, destigmatizing

13:53

things in a ways important

13:55

part of this conversation. But yeah, I'd love to hear

13:57

your thoughts. Yeah, for sure. Thank

13:59

you so much for asking that question. Katie.

14:02

Universal basic income is probably

14:04

one of the most progressive things out there,

14:07

and so for people to suddenly now

14:09

catch on, it's like, oh and

14:11

and and it's a it's a good thing because

14:13

it's not like, oh, why didn't you catch on sooner?

14:16

No, I'm glad and happy right

14:18

that you caught before. It was

14:20

cool kind of stuff, you

14:23

know, exactly. So it's like, why do we have even

14:25

have to go there? Like, I'm glad that you know about it

14:27

now, and and so let's talk about

14:30

ways that we can implement it. Um

14:32

but pulling back just for a sight before I go

14:34

back into there. For for our platform,

14:37

we're focused really on empowering

14:39

the American people in our communities again

14:41

because the focus has not been on

14:43

our people the past thirty forty years.

14:46

And so for us, it's like, okay, so, David,

14:48

what does putting the focus on the people look like?

14:51

And it's very basic elements of do

14:53

our people have access to good food?

14:56

Can they eat good food? Like? Can

14:58

they have it? Like? Is it hard to get it? Like?

15:00

Do they have access to good healthcare and education?

15:03

Do they have a room to sleep in with the roof over

15:05

their head? Are they able to pay for basic

15:08

expenses. And these are the very basic

15:10

things and

15:12

and and ensuring, because if a government

15:14

is one that is of the people, for the

15:16

people, and by the people, then it

15:18

should be taking care of the people. It's

15:20

not. It's not some radical

15:23

socialist or whatever crazy

15:26

idea you want to put on it. It's a very

15:28

basic practical result

15:31

of what a government, a representative government,

15:33

is supposed to be. And if we're paying

15:35

our tax and money into the system and we're

15:37

not seeing this, then we can demand

15:39

for something else. And so now

15:42

going back into the UBI parts, So the UBI

15:44

part takes care of the basic

15:46

expenses, but I think beyond that, what it really

15:48

represents is it

15:50

it starts addressing this thirty

15:53

forty plus year income wage stagnation

15:55

that's been happening, this widening wealth

15:57

gap, even before going to automation,

16:00

which is probably an

16:02

equally important area and reason, but

16:04

even before that, our people

16:06

are financially distressed and depressed

16:09

right now, and that affects them not just in

16:11

their finances, mentally emotionally

16:13

as well, and it contributes to

16:15

more unrest ease.

16:18

And and I come from

16:20

a child, and I'm

16:22

not gonna say I come from I come from as

16:24

a child from domestic violence, and my parents

16:27

fought mostly because of money. UM

16:29

and the fact that we're putting

16:31

the strain onto our families and our communities

16:33

and saying you deal with it without giving them bootstraps

16:36

or boots even is

16:39

is is the biggest evil that we

16:41

could be doing. UM is the biggest evil

16:43

that they could be doing to us. And I

16:45

think it's really our time to wake up and realize,

16:47

holy sh it, Like, yeah, we're talking about

16:49

it, but it just doesn't end here at talking where

16:51

it goes a lot further and so what a U

16:53

b I would really do? I mean

16:56

for those who also aren't aware of

16:58

you b I. Another good reason is for automation,

17:00

because we see a lot of our jobs being

17:02

automated, especially during now in COVID

17:04

nineteen, because there are a lot

17:06

of people who are afraid

17:09

to go ahead and risk their health and going out

17:11

and working a lot of restaurants. I I

17:14

forgot what restaurant they were showing a video

17:16

on CNN of how they have robot

17:18

cooks now and what and they're

17:20

cooking the food and so so it was

17:23

and I'll send you that link when I see it. But it's

17:25

just it's in the sense of everything

17:28

is being automated to the point of like

17:31

if you go to the warehouses and Amazon, or

17:33

if you go um like, you'll

17:35

see automation in your face happening.

17:37

And even from my legal industry, I know that the

17:39

co founders of legal Zoom, they've created something

17:41

else that will now be displacing even

17:44

more attorneys. Um who

17:46

And I get that we have this this automatic

17:48

bias against attorneys. But for those

17:51

who graduate in recent years with the legal economy

17:53

with ship like, they still have two hundred thousand

17:56

dollars loan that and they're unable

17:58

to pay it. Um. So I think there's a

18:00

different time and era for these

18:02

occupations. And even with that, like with law

18:04

schools pumping in students and pumping out and

18:08

there's so many areas that we can start

18:10

tackling and addressing in terms of

18:12

where, what are we doing and why are we not being

18:14

efficient in all of these ways. So the

18:16

idea of u b I is to help UH

18:19

kind of buffer the different

18:22

changes that could happen when automation occurs.

18:24

So that's the second reason. But on an overall

18:27

skill, U b I imagine

18:29

practically what it would do to an area in

18:31

our district where the per capita income is twelve

18:33

to fifteen thousand dollars, having a

18:36

ubi of even a thousand dollars a month would

18:38

double their income, would be able

18:40

to increase their ability to

18:42

not be strapped and chained

18:45

to their minimum wage jobs that they hate

18:47

or whatever other jobs with conditions

18:49

that they don't prefer, and

18:51

they would it would allow them to have the flexibility

18:54

and freedom and breathing room to actually

18:56

breathe now and to consciously

18:58

make choices, because we're always

19:00

making these choices in our reactive parasympathetic

19:04

state, being all in this freight fight or

19:06

freeze mode because of the conditions that we've created

19:08

our people to live in. And so if we

19:10

were able to give our people some breathing

19:12

space where now they have the ability to

19:15

go ahead and take a class, to go ahead and

19:17

transition into a different career, or

19:19

go ahead and be able to work for a

19:21

job that's part time and still have the

19:23

finances to be able to still pay for their basic

19:25

expenses. And there's the fungibility

19:27

aspect. What U Katie referenced earlier

19:30

is one of the big keys, not

19:32

just in terms of stigma. But in terms

19:34

of we as the people, we know best

19:37

what we need our money for. And

19:39

yes, I'm grateful our family lived

19:41

on safety net programs, but like

19:43

my my food assistance isn't

19:46

going to help me with paying my rent. There

19:48

are times that the food assistance like

19:50

it'll be so handy and so helpful,

19:53

but there are times where I could be using

19:55

assistance elsewhere. And so why

19:57

add all of the bureaucratic tape, the

19:59

extra government in between, the

20:01

all the extra means, testing and hurdles

20:04

to prove that I don't have money to pay rent

20:06

or poop food on the table. Why do we do

20:08

that extra unnecessary pain and suffering

20:10

to our people and then to ourselves

20:13

on our bandwidth wise, when we could actually putting

20:15

our focus on other things in terms

20:18

of creating an infrastructure for our

20:20

people, making sure that every community taken care

20:22

of, like this is where we could actually be

20:24

spending more of our time in. And so for

20:26

me, I think what got me

20:28

to go into the entertainment industry and I saw

20:30

that need and what got me to go here

20:32

was there are so many things in areas

20:35

that we could be cleaning up right now on just

20:37

a practical level, even putting party politics

20:39

aside, like it

20:42

doesn't make sense that we continue in our

20:44

imperialistic conquests around the world.

20:47

Although some might not think, oh

20:49

David was didn't imperialism ends, like

20:51

well, I don't know. We're still living

20:53

it out. And it's there's no need

20:55

for us to be pouring money into this and that

20:58

even in and of itself, isn't a party politics

21:00

thing. Everyone's doing, whether you're Republican or Democrat.

21:03

And so it's it's rethinking what

21:05

are we doing as a government, and how are we

21:07

holding our officials accountable and so

21:09

what I'm very grateful despite what people

21:12

may think of Bernie and oh he's traded

21:14

or whatnot, I'm still super grateful

21:16

that he let us out of our bird cage. I'm grateful

21:18

that Andrew did to Mary Anne, Tulsie, all

21:20

of these people did. I'm grateful that Ao

21:22

season office, Ilhano Mars in office,

21:25

Rashida as an office. Uh.

21:27

I'm sorry sorry that I'm saying by the first name. They're

21:29

just Dianna Pressley's in office.

21:31

But these people are what help

21:34

us. Are are

21:36

are are the people that empower

21:38

us to become our own true and

21:41

powerful selves and enable us

21:43

to walk out more in our truth and freedom where

21:45

now we have not just people and

21:48

a year ago, I never would have thought I'd be running

21:51

for office right now, but I am. But it's

21:53

it's it's breaking that whole

21:55

stereotype of oh, there's a certain image

21:57

that only runs for office, but no, a rep resenative

22:00

government looks like one that is made up

22:02

of from people from all different kinds of backgrounds,

22:05

occupations and facets of life.

22:07

And that's what we need to move towards and how do

22:09

we get there. And so that's the thing that we

22:11

need to be doing. I told my boyfriend, Hey,

22:14

babe, once we reached the six yeared Mike,

22:16

You're like, you're pulling me out and pull me yanked me

22:18

out because I'm just in and out, like

22:20

I really just want to see change and helps spark

22:22

that. So that's a really important point there.

22:25

I Mean, there's so much to impact on what you just said, but

22:27

touching on that first, Yeah,

22:29

we need people that come in and serve their time

22:32

and and you know, bring ideas.

22:35

And we also need people

22:37

do not grow old in office and to

22:39

get stuck in the same and

22:42

get used to having power over

22:44

people and society.

22:47

UM, it's like that, you know, power, power

22:49

corrupts, but not me, not well

22:57

together everything

23:05

UBI. I mean yeah, like I said, so many things

23:07

that you mentioned that really

23:09

stand out to me. Uh, the first

23:11

one being what you

23:13

suggested, like your background

23:16

or people having different sorts

23:18

of issues at home that on the surface

23:20

seem unrelated to money, but it can

23:22

all be traced back to money. And I think

23:24

people are palpably feeling this right

23:26

now as tensions are high, and they're

23:29

feeling their own mental health or stability,

23:31

uh, emotional well being

23:34

being fraid, as they're trying to figure out how

23:36

to meet make ends meet. UM.

23:38

And the other thing about UBI, and look, I

23:41

will admittedly say that even I've

23:43

always I've been interested in UBI for a

23:45

long time, and when we started having these

23:47

conversations, as exciting as it was, it

23:49

felt daunting. It felt like a

23:51

daunting task to tackle

23:54

at this point in time. But

23:56

at the same time, you know, you

23:59

look at Bernie's anders. Medicare for

24:01

all a while

24:03

back, wasn't something that people considered

24:05

a possibility, and now it is. You start

24:07

talking about it, you start destigmatizing

24:10

it, and you start

24:13

planting the seeds that this is actually not only

24:15

a possibility but a necessity.

24:17

Um And and changing the general perception

24:20

in this pandemic one

24:22

thing has exposed

24:24

all the cracks in this foundation. And

24:27

the other thing that I thought of as we were

24:29

talking is just the basic concept of that our

24:31

world is changing. Um.

24:34

And with all this turmoil, you

24:37

have a loss of freedom

24:40

to think outside the box.

24:42

You know, you're in this grind of trying to

24:44

make ends meet well, and how are people going

24:46

to come up with the next big idea? How

24:50

do we uh free ourselves

24:52

to continue to expand and solve the problems

24:55

that we're facing because we've got a lot of them.

24:57

And and you be I feels like

25:00

a very good start for for laying that

25:02

foundation and fixing our foundation. Um.

25:06

And it's possible. I don't

25:08

know how you go about making

25:10

it happen, but it is

25:12

possible. We've been giving out all this money

25:15

to the wrong people during this pandemic

25:18

when they could have authorized something

25:20

that is a monthly payment to

25:22

people to

25:25

make ends meet, to to say

25:27

that you're supported, that you know we're protecting

25:29

you during this time, and not

25:32

sending billions of dollars to you

25:34

know, huge corporations in in

25:36

in lawmakers anyway, yeah,

25:40

or the Pentagon, Yeah, they they

25:43

they allocated more funding for fighter jets.

25:45

Um, oh my god,

25:47

the relief. That's that's COVID

25:49

relief, right there, more fighter jets that we

25:52

don't need. Yeah. And

25:54

and and you make a very great point about

25:56

that, Katie. During that time where people

25:58

don't have money to buy food or

26:01

pay rent, like, you should give

26:03

the people money direct cash relief right

26:05

now. Um. Whether and

26:07

whether that looks like two thousand dollars a month

26:09

during the pandemic and then after a thousand a

26:11

month, because everybody will still be recuperating.

26:15

Um. And that's the way to get money into

26:17

the hands of people the fastest, because

26:19

once you do a whole means tested and

26:22

and go through all these departments, like

26:24

people still haven't gotten there one time

26:26

stimulus check from last time. And

26:29

it's it's this, it's this lack of realization

26:32

or deliberate ignorance and pushing

26:34

away or or not. I guess

26:36

ignorance can't be delivered. It could be ignorance

26:39

could be but

26:42

pushing away the fact the

26:45

fact that our people are the economy.

26:47

We are the economy. If we

26:49

don't have money, there's no economy, like

26:52

nothing will be running and so and so

26:55

the government they have their own separate economy,

26:57

which is the war industry, military industrial

27:00

complex economy that they're doing. But

27:02

it's it's a matter of realizing, like we

27:04

the people do matter on a collectively

27:06

on our own skill as well, but then on the

27:08

government side realizing, holy sh it,

27:10

like we need a conscious

27:13

check here, like and I hate to hate

27:15

to I'm not bringing any religion into it, but there needs

27:17

to be some sort of spiritual

27:20

or emotional or or a revolution

27:22

in our conscious that had needs to happen in

27:24

d C right now. And that's what Mary Anne

27:26

kept on driving on of we need to have

27:28

a revival of of actually humanity

27:31

and self. And that's where Andrew Yang brought his whole

27:33

humanity first element, and that's what a lot of these

27:35

candidates had in mind, was we need to remember

27:38

the human race, like we need to help

27:40

each other right now. Um, I'm getting passionate,

27:42

sim lifting, gesticulating

27:44

and so

27:48

so so in a way like and it's not it's

27:50

and it seems crazy at first because when

27:52

I remember when I heard UBI for the

27:54

first time, I thought what are you serious?

27:57

Nah, come on like you

28:00

know, like your Asian and you're saying that you do

28:02

the math and all of it. But because

28:04

I hadn't heard about UBI until first learning

28:06

about Andrew, which was a

28:08

while before the debates, a lot before that,

28:11

and once I started going down the rabbit hole, rabbit

28:13

hole, I found, holy crap. Martin Luther

28:16

King Jr. Was preaching about this in his

28:18

last book, Spooking Speaking Tour Where

28:20

Do We Go From Here around nineteen six nine

28:23

sixty nine when he was assassinated, and

28:25

that was one of the things he was proposing. He was

28:27

saying, we do all of these great things

28:29

to help the poor and to eradicate

28:31

poverty, and we we do all of these programs

28:34

and implementations, but when it comes to the implementation

28:37

of it all, we solve everything else first,

28:39

and then we come down last to poverty, and

28:41

it's never solved and it's always unaddressed.

28:43

And he says, the only way we can do it with is a basic

28:46

income, and so he had fought for that.

28:48

It almost it passed in the House, didn't

28:50

pass in the Senate, and that happened twice. I think

28:52

it was nineteen seventy one and another

28:55

year, and so this has happened

28:57

throughout history. Thomas Payne,

28:59

one of our four founding fathers, supported He

29:01

didn't. He thought it was absurd that a human

29:03

being could own land, let alone in American

29:06

because even before we came over, the

29:08

first Americans came over from from Great

29:11

Britain and from other countries. The Native

29:13

Americans were there, and they were

29:15

they were there too, but then before then, the land

29:17

was already there, and so it was this idea

29:19

of nobody can own land, and

29:22

so he created he was proposing creating

29:24

a lound Land Endowment Tax

29:26

Fund into which those over certain age

29:28

would pay a land tax and from their

29:30

basic income would be distributed. Unfortunately

29:33

that that didn't pass. But there's been

29:35

movements along the way in history, and

29:38

similarly, although it's not it's

29:40

it's different types of right. We have the civil rights

29:43

movement, the Women's movement, UH

29:45

and and different movements and suffrage

29:47

movements along the way. But now is a time

29:49

where we're in that process where

29:52

it's another revolution, another change,

29:54

another big series of change. That's point

29:56

that's about to happen, and and right

29:58

now we need to realize whole the crap, like we're

30:01

we've come this far and we need to continue more

30:03

because we do see it building before our

30:05

eyes. You, UM, I don't

30:07

know if you are aware. There's a party that just formed.

30:10

Um it's called for a People's Party, and they're

30:12

really trying to get on the ball and get

30:14

rolling. By two and

30:16

and we have probably a

30:18

record number of Downbell congressional candidates

30:21

running across the nation for their primary

30:23

races this selection cycle. We have many

30:26

more forming chapters and groups in the

30:29

off spurs of the organizations that Bernie

30:31

started with Our Revolution, that Andrew started

30:34

with Humanity Ford, et cetera. And so we're

30:36

now slowly building a movement that's

30:38

that can only grow bigger. So

30:41

for us right now, it's an exciting time, but

30:43

it's also a very serious time where we can't

30:45

lose focus, where we can't compromise,

30:48

like we can't compromise by continuing

30:50

to fund a seven forty billion

30:53

plus dollar Pentagon military

30:55

budget anymore. We can't compromise

30:57

in these things. But it's a matter of then

30:59

how do we go up out doing it like and

31:01

this is where we need to come and have

31:03

a deeper conversation with those

31:05

in our communities and those in d C

31:08

where we're actually talking with our communities

31:10

first and saying, hey, what are your basic

31:12

concerns and needs right now? Okay,

31:14

how would you like that to be responded to?

31:17

What would help you out the most? Right now? What would

31:19

help you thrive? Taking that and

31:21

then articulating that back into legislation

31:23

in DC. And that's the process that should

31:25

be happening instead of their legislating

31:27

amongst themselves then coming back

31:30

to our communities with the crumbs that they have and

31:32

saying, hey, look what we got for you. Um.

31:34

And so this whole mindset just everything

31:36

needs to change. But what's the answer, David,

31:39

What should we do? And it's us realizing collectively

31:42

like that we have the power. We are

31:44

the revolution, no matter how much of

31:46

a cliche it might sound like, we are the

31:48

fucking revolution. We are the economy.

31:51

We as long as we say

31:53

that we matter and take action individually

31:55

and collectively, we could

31:58

be so powerful, so powerful

32:01

they're we forget that

32:03

and they want us to forget that. Yeah, yeah,

32:06

because they control us through poverty. That's

32:08

why they don't want to give us. That's

32:11

why they don't want to give us another that's

32:13

why they want to means test that stimulus check even

32:15

more. That's why they want to cut off the percentage

32:18

of the expanded unemployment benefits. Just so

32:20

on and so forth. They control us through poverty,

32:22

saying stuff like, you know, people

32:25

aren't returning to work because they're getting so much

32:27

more money on unemployment, instead

32:29

of acknowledging the fact that we're in the middle of a pandemic.

32:31

Also, excuse me, they're

32:33

getting paid not that

32:36

much money. People aren't

32:38

getting that much money on unemployment. Let's

32:40

just accept that. And why

32:43

the so some people

32:45

might be making more money on their unemployment

32:48

than at their job. That's a problem.

32:51

Why is that? Okay?

32:53

I mean, like and and so using that

32:55

as a as a way to stigmatize people

32:58

who are receiving money from the government to

33:00

you know, cover costs of living is

33:02

ghoulish to me. Um,

33:05

you know, and back to your point earlier

33:07

about like, okay, so assistance

33:10

to help with food, that's great,

33:12

but like I need it for rent And why do

33:14

I have to jump through all this red tape to justify

33:17

how I need to spend money to come, you

33:19

know, to to live anyway

33:22

gets me frustrated. Sorry, Cody,

33:24

did you had something you wanted to say? And I just kind of bold,

33:26

right, it's very very passionate.

33:30

Um no, I's I mean, there's

33:32

just so much to talk about this and like

33:34

what our America is

33:36

very skewed idea of what freedom is

33:39

and like rugged individuality and the fact

33:41

like ignoring the fact that

33:43

we are really all in this together and we are

33:46

You judge a society by how they treat their

33:49

poor, and like if you lift

33:51

up everybody that's the poorest,

33:53

then everybody above them will be lifted up as well.

33:56

UM. One one one of my so

33:58

one of my things about you, b I actually is

34:00

um And this was more I think

34:02

maybe more of a communication uh

34:05

issue on Yang's part at least, um

34:07

where if you're giving so

34:10

like you're giving money, like let's say two

34:12

grand a month everybody. If we live

34:14

in a society where if

34:16

you add up like rent and food and

34:18

uh and heat and like all all the like the basic

34:21

needs. You know, we have a hierarchy of needs that

34:23

we all kind of understand, like well, food and water,

34:25

shelter, those kinds of things. But if you can't

34:28

if you can't pay for all

34:30

of those things in a month with the two thousand

34:32

dollars, then the UBI seems

34:35

more like, um, kind of like a

34:37

band aid, like okay, well we'll give you some money.

34:40

Um. And I guess I'm wondering if there's

34:42

any sort of uh, I guess you to be U

34:44

B I requires looking

34:46

at other aspects of society to bring those

34:48

costs down too, so that if I were to give

34:51

somebody two thousand dollars a month, they can

34:53

pay their rent, they can buy food,

34:55

they can do all the things that are

34:57

required to survive as a human being

35:00

with that too. Grand Um, if that

35:02

were to happen, Yeah, I guess YEA, I'm still

35:04

wondering if you have any thoughts about that.

35:07

Yeah. No, those are very great points.

35:10

And I am I am not a

35:12

believer that one solution will

35:14

solve everything because while

35:17

and that's why our platform is really

35:20

addresses each of those needs, so

35:22

for having a roof room and a

35:24

roof to sleep under a home's guarantee,

35:27

for paying your basic expenses, universal

35:29

basic income for healthcare, Medicare for all,

35:31

for education, free education and vocational

35:33

schools UH, and cancelation of student

35:36

debt. So for us, it's realizing

35:38

a U b I is not going to

35:40

immediately solve all of your financial needs

35:42

for the month. But even

35:45

right now or pre COVID nineteen, we had

35:47

seventy of Americans living

35:49

paycheck to paycheck each month, most

35:52

having most not having savings more

35:54

than three to four hundred dollars UM.

35:56

And imagine what kind of relief

35:58

that would do for our people on an emotional,

36:01

on a mental level. First of all,

36:04

on on that level, and then it's also attacking

36:06

all of those areas you mentioned. Why do we have

36:08

astronomical pharmaceutical costs and healthcare

36:11

costs? Like that's crazy. It's because

36:13

we have executives making billions and trillions

36:16

off of us UM. That's why

36:18

that's where the money is going. Like

36:21

where do you get the money? It's like, will you take

36:23

it from them? Like

36:25

it's right and simple. These corporate interests

36:28

that have become the main constituents

36:30

of our elected officials, and they're not

36:32

they're not they're they're their corporate

36:35

entities. They're not human beings. But suddenly

36:37

they've become constituents of our elected officials.

36:39

So it's changing that um, changing

36:42

how we go ahead and do everything

36:45

else. With with housing, for instance,

36:47

we have over seventy billion dollars

36:49

in federal public housing that needs

36:52

improvements right now, and

36:54

nothing's being done with that. We have

36:56

paid to place schemes in so many

36:58

cities across the nation in and

37:01

even our probably

37:03

a lot of us, our own federal elected officials,

37:06

are engaging in those two. And so it's

37:08

this turning a blind eye to corruption

37:10

in your face is also a thing that drives

37:12

all of our housing concept, the gentrification

37:15

of it all. And so it's realizing while

37:18

we go ahead and supply all these needs,

37:20

we also need to have a responsibility

37:22

and a justice element to it. And so that's where

37:25

our campaign platform comes in. So

37:27

instead of naming our committee paid for

37:29

by David Kimp for Congress, one

37:31

of the things I've learned growing up is a name really gives

37:33

you a lot of power and identity. Um,

37:36

her my mom and what my dad told me and so

37:38

so are the name of our campaign committee.

37:40

It's pretty long. It's paid for by David Kimp for Congress.

37:43

Financial freedom, the financial

37:45

freedom part empowering our people. Love.

37:48

What does love look like? From an elected official?

37:50

Love looks like taking care of and caring for your

37:52

people, spending less of your money

37:54

creating these regime change, endless wars abroad

37:57

and taking that money and caring for your

37:59

people. Um and then justice for

38:01

all. We need justice to ensure that everyone

38:03

continues to be treated equally and

38:06

fairly and have that access. So what

38:08

does that look like. That means banning corporate

38:10

money from elections. We we can't.

38:12

We need to wash out all corporate money from

38:14

elections. It doesn't make sense that

38:17

you get elected to office because you have

38:19

the most corporate donors behind your

38:21

campaign war chest and funds you to office.

38:23

And even though you've knocked less doors than

38:26

your challengers combined or or

38:28

individually, even though you've called and

38:30

talked to less constituents than any of your

38:32

challengers. And so it's it's a matter

38:34

of this moral revolution that

38:36

needs to happen on the justice side, not

38:39

just in the government, but now everything

38:41

that we're also doing, because actions speak

38:43

louder than words. Why are we militarizing

38:45

our police, Why are we invading

38:48

the rights of our own people by allowing espionage

38:50

rights against our own people through through

38:54

through the BS and excuse of oh no, it's

38:56

for foreign power and foreign national

38:58

security. But then why are you doing that? To

39:00

your own people, and why are

39:02

we oppressing our communities? And so it's this

39:04

accountability aspect of our platform,

39:06

which is the justice aspect of No,

39:09

it doesn't make sense that more than

39:11

two thirds of the people that are incarcerated

39:13

are black and brown people. It doesn't make sense

39:15

that more than two thirds of the

39:17

people living in federal public housing currently

39:20

and we're completely neglecting the seventy billion

39:23

dollars and improvements that need to be made, two thirds of

39:25

them are black and brown. So, like,

39:27

we see institutionalized racism

39:29

before our eyes, but we're not doing anything

39:31

about it. We see this blatant war

39:34

against poverty, but we're not doing about

39:36

it. And so now it's time for us for

39:38

people to really stand up to identify

39:40

it and just call it out. Um. But

39:42

obviously media won't shine a light

39:44

on those people, and so UM,

39:46

I'm super thankful that Katie and

39:49

and you all offered me this time to be

39:51

on your platform because this is the one

39:53

of the ways that we can share with other people and

39:55

expanding that knowledge because the main

39:58

media won't do it well. Together

40:06

everything, so all

40:10

of this seems to go along with

40:13

you. Another part of your website that I was really compelled

40:15

by which is the human centered

40:17

economy? You know, the adjusting

40:19

of how we think about the economy.

40:21

And I loved that. Um,

40:24

are there more things you want to speak to that specific

40:26

point? I mean, I do think that we've

40:28

been talking about it this whole time. It's

40:31

all hand in hand. But I love

40:33

I love that phrasing too. I

40:36

mean these bullet points. Human

40:38

beings are more significant than money

40:40

and life. I worked, I was

40:43

working in human resources. When I would interview

40:45

for jobs right out of college, I'd be like, I want to put

40:47

the human back in human resources

40:49

for you. I did think that you met a past

40:51

life past life at first, Um,

40:54

and that was like this will be interesting

40:56

there. I was like, were

40:58

you a human being? I was like,

41:01

okay, I'll go for this. Red. I

41:03

had a psychic once told me

41:05

that I I was a dolphin in a

41:07

past life. I died

41:09

in the ocean, and that's why I don't

41:12

like the ocean that much. I do think

41:14

you were a dolphin in past life? The

41:16

author? Does it does fit? Um?

41:19

David? You also Oh no, sorry, go ahead,

41:21

No. I was just gonna say, dolphins are

41:23

so cute. I wish I can anyhow

41:26

I want to go see a dolphins scene. Well,

41:28

here I am.

41:32

You touched on the homes

41:34

guarantee, which is another thing I wanted to

41:36

to talk about. Yeah,

41:39

Um, on your website you you started

41:41

this section by saying we need to pass HR four

41:43

three five one and S nine nine, which

41:46

is the MBI Act. Um. I want

41:48

to hear about the homes guarantee, but I also I would love

41:50

it if you could explain that a little bit to us.

41:52

Yeah, yeah, for sure, Um, Before

41:55

I get to that. The human center economy, it's

41:57

just basically the idea of if

41:59

we are supposed to be a government that prioritize

42:02

and puts the people first and do all

42:04

of these things with universal basic

42:06

income, Medicare for all, etcetera,

42:08

then that's great. But then

42:10

how do we ensure that we actually

42:13

have gauges, good

42:15

identifiers to make sure that we're doing that

42:17

on the track we need. We

42:19

don't need measures like GDP of whether

42:22

measuring whether or not our countries in a good state

42:24

are here in stock market went up

42:27

like we're doing great exactly,

42:31

So, how in the world is that a good gauge and indicator

42:33

of where our country is When most of every

42:36

one of us are frightened and uncertain

42:38

and not knowing what's going to happen or how they're going

42:40

to pay their bills and their rent. Like, that's

42:43

not a good indicator of where we're at. So we

42:45

actually need a job performance

42:47

evaluation that makes sense. And

42:49

so that job performance evaluation of how our

42:51

government and country is doing isn't based on stock

42:54

market or GDP. It should be based on how

42:56

our people are doing. So what does that

42:58

mean? What does that look like? If we're prioritizing

43:00

our people, that are people should be doing well?

43:02

So what are the factors we should look out for, like long

43:05

life expectancy, health, like where

43:08

merite, like in all of these different ways,

43:10

if we're able to put the focus on

43:13

our people in terms of um

43:15

making, a focus on job skills,

43:17

training, on employment, on mental emotional

43:20

health care, on taking care of our families,

43:22

because every family is a war zone now

43:24

because we're not we're putting the financial

43:26

strain on all of our families, and we're driving

43:29

our parents so emotionally and mentally

43:31

burdened now they're not able to kind

43:35

of coincide or exist, co exists where their

43:37

emotions and so where does that seem

43:39

to that seems to parents,

43:41

to the and anti parents as well and

43:43

amongst themselves, and it creates. And so that's

43:45

why our platform also has free I

43:47

know a lot of people might think, oh,

43:49

how are you going to do that? We have money for it.

43:52

How do we just print three extra

43:54

trillion new dollars and put that into

43:56

currency. And so it's a matter of realizing,

43:59

no, that we matter in so for our platform,

44:01

we're we're including free marriage counseling,

44:03

free family counseling for all because

44:05

a lot of us, majority of us,

44:08

like believe it or not, some of us

44:10

like we were always operating in our paris

44:12

sympathetic state in this freight fight or freeze

44:15

mode, where we should actually be operating

44:17

from our sympathetic state, from a very

44:19

deep, conscious awareness and responsive

44:21

state where we're able to really

44:23

be healed from all of the trauma that's been

44:26

going on in all of us. And so it's ensuring that

44:28

our people are not just financially okay,

44:30

not just physically okay, but that they're mentally,

44:33

mentally and emotionally okay as well. And

44:35

so these are the gauges that should be in place

44:37

for a human centered economy. Um.

44:39

Going now to Homes Guarantee. You

44:41

are amazing, Thank you, You've got

44:43

everything, all of these balls that you're juggling right

44:46

now. But yes, I like that. Homes

44:48

Guarantee is great. Homes

44:50

Guarantee. The bills that you reference there the ymbi

44:53

at Yimbie bills. So basically they're about

44:55

removing exclusionary zoning policies,

44:57

building residential housing, multi dual

45:00

units in place that we're not originally

45:02

zoned out for that, building multi dwelling accessory

45:05

units, increasing housing in

45:07

areas that that we could see more housing, and

45:09

not putting these arbitrary exclusionary

45:12

zoning laws and land speculation that occurs

45:15

where the price of our land just keeps on

45:17

going up and there's nobody using

45:19

that land or the buildings on it, and so it's

45:21

getting rid of that. That's a basic. So

45:23

now what we need to do on top of that is

45:26

called fimby. So we have nimby

45:28

not in my backyard yet uh yem

45:30

b yes, in my backyard uh. And

45:32

then fimby is public housing

45:34

in my backyard. So it's a matter of

45:37

So what the Homes Guarantee is about is providing

45:40

a set of basic tenants

45:43

rights for everybody, because if you

45:45

think about it, what's the majority of your income

45:47

going towards Katie Sophie Cody Rent,

45:50

rent, rent, rent number

45:52

one thing that we're paying but our

45:54

government is not doing. Like when

45:56

Biden first came out with his task forces several

45:59

months ago, he had nothing on housing, and I was like,

46:01

are you in touch with the people right now? What

46:04

in the world's Like the

46:06

one of the biggest things that we pay from

46:08

our monthly income is rent. We

46:11

should be having a conversation around

46:13

this, and why is it that out of forty

46:15

one million renting households in the nation,

46:18

over twenty million of them are paying more

46:20

than a third of their income. Why

46:22

is it that out of the forty plus million, twelve

46:25

plus million of them are paying more than half

46:27

of their income? Like why is

46:29

that? So these are the things we need to talk

46:31

about. So it's establishing UM

46:34

guidance and laws, and it's for the

46:36

majority of our people tenants not to be taking

46:38

advantage of because that's not right

46:41

UM on moral and practical level. And number

46:43

two, improving making

46:45

expenditures towards the seventy billion dollars

46:47

in federal public housing improvements that need to be

46:49

made. That's institutionalized racism

46:52

right there. Um. And it's also for

46:54

for Los Angeles and particularly

46:57

for for those who aren't aware, we have less

46:59

than tenth in public housing units.

47:01

This is very small compared to other cities

47:03

and counties where they have two hundred a

47:05

couple of few hundred thousand units

47:08

in public housing. And the reason why it's back in the fifties,

47:10

we had a group that was specifically

47:12

formed to stamp out

47:14

all public housing because they wanted Los Angeles

47:17

to be have a nice landscape to rich people

47:19

and and to live out that Hollywood life

47:21

and picture. And so we don't have

47:23

public housing, but yet our

47:25

people were. That's why our district

47:27

is the tenth poorest district in the nation. And

47:29

we continue to be because, I

47:32

mean, we continue to go downward because we're

47:34

we're completely being neglected. We're neglecting

47:36

our people where they need it the most, and that's housing.

47:39

What has our people, What have our city

47:41

elected officials done with the money

47:43

that we've passed a few billion dollars

47:45

towards building housing and towards homelessness

47:48

and eradicating it. They've spent seven hundred

47:50

thousand dollars of unit. I think they built a

47:53

couple of units, not even. And so it's it's

47:55

a matter of wow, like we could

47:57

be doing so much for our people right now.

48:00

And so another main component of Homes Guarantee

48:02

is this idea of creating twelve

48:05

million social housing units, just

48:07

like in Europe where and

48:09

the twelve million number is based on those

48:11

experiencing homelessness UM in

48:13

our country. And so it's building at

48:15

least twelve million social housing units where

48:18

people won't have to pay more than a third

48:20

of their income. Well, there will be program

48:22

in policies in place, um, and so it's

48:24

allowing for those that shortage

48:26

now to be addressed on a big,

48:29

radical change scale. And

48:31

so this is these are the types of change that we really

48:33

need right now. A second f drum

48:36

type of era. UM.

48:38

I'm not I'm sure I've mentioned this on

48:40

one of our podcasts at some point, UM,

48:44

but especially like when you were talking about the Hindi

48:46

Act. I mean so much what

48:48

you said resonates with me. UM.

48:51

My father for has worked in nonprofits.

48:54

He's retired now, but he was running uh

48:58

A rehabilitation facility in northern californ

49:00

and in by that because of that was you

49:02

know, on different council boards

49:05

and stuff, and and to

49:07

talk about homelessness and different things. And in half Moon

49:10

Bay, for example, there was this big

49:12

tract of land and people

49:14

were we had they had a developer or

49:16

somebody that had a

49:19

plan for how to quickly build

49:22

public housing something something they wanted

49:24

to do. But the but the hurdle was

49:27

zoning. The hurdle was getting

49:30

permission from the city.

49:32

And it never happened because

49:34

there was no incentive or there was no

49:37

like there. It was just too much red tape, too many things.

49:39

And it's like, we have the land, you

49:41

have the resources, you have somebody willing

49:43

to do it, um, And they couldn't

49:46

pull it together. And and and that. I'm sure

49:48

there's more details that I'm missing from this story, but

49:50

it's it's so inherently frustrating

49:53

and wrong. Um.

49:56

And for years we've been watching in

49:58

California and Los Angeles, in San Francisco the

50:00

homeless, uh, the in housed population

50:03

explode because of all of the stuff that we've been talking about

50:06

today. And I see this

50:08

happening and people can just walk past it.

50:10

They don't want to have homelessness,

50:13

you know, a blight on the community. They

50:15

don't want this lower income stuff. Well,

50:17

now it's something that you

50:19

can't ignore. It's it makes

50:21

it feel like you know, two

50:26

years ago or you know, you just can't ignore

50:29

the fact that that this is a crisis

50:31

and it's at our doorsteps, and we shouldn't

50:33

be ignoring it. We need to be This needs to be a

50:35

huge priority for all of us. And it goes back

50:37

to everything that we've been saying before.

50:40

We want our economy to boom when we need to

50:42

have people taken care of and have access

50:44

to basic resources to live their life,

50:46

to to make money, to spend

50:48

money, um and

50:51

and yes, so yeah

50:54

you're out of steam there, but no,

50:56

you're you're and it's

50:58

this, it's this, and it's this.

51:01

We we put our communities in such

51:03

a paralysis state where now

51:05

we have so many unhoused neighbors

51:08

and and people we know where

51:11

we we also want to help, and we

51:13

are and that's why we have mutual aid networks

51:15

in Los Angeles and other groups that help

51:17

help out like Caton for All and Street

51:20

Watch and a lot of great groups. But

51:22

there comes a certain point too, because

51:25

we are also using our own

51:27

resources to give the limited

51:29

resources that our government allows for.

51:32

And so it's become such a serious point

51:34

now where like people

51:36

are dying, like people are literally

51:39

dying. Why aren't you common

51:41

during hotels to house our

51:43

unhoused neighbors right now when when

51:46

they need a place to stay right now, especially during

51:48

a pandemic. Why why

51:50

is that not being the first thing

51:53

being done right now? Um, out of any

51:55

elected officials conscious, heart, and mind, why

51:57

is that not the first thing? And it's because

52:00

they see they

52:03

only see numbers, they only see money,

52:05

they only see popularity, they only see

52:08

career, job stability

52:10

to continue to be reelected

52:12

because they don't know anything else besides

52:15

the six digit salary that they're getting. So

52:17

they're going to do all that they can to

52:19

to hold on to that job and position. They're

52:21

going to do all that they can to continue taking

52:23

the corporate money that will give them the

52:26

emotional security and financial

52:28

security that everything will be okay,

52:30

even though the people are suffering, and they don't

52:32

even view the people as

52:35

human beings were all viewed, let alone

52:37

viewing our un housed brothers and sisters as ghosts.

52:40

They're viewing now they're starting to view masses

52:42

of people as just ghosts and just as

52:44

subjects in a way, as just another

52:47

number, when we're actually all human

52:49

beings and not one of us is less than another,

52:51

not one soul um. And so it's

52:53

this moral revolution that really needs to

52:55

happen on such a deep, deep level. And

52:58

I'm sure there's an element of

53:00

not seeing them as voters, you

53:02

know, seeing people that don't have a

53:05

mailing address as somebody that

53:07

they need to reach out to for support.

53:10

UM. The disenfranchiseman

53:12

is is. The disfranchiseman is crazy

53:14

in the sense of whether it be those

53:17

of our family

53:19

neighbors, brothers, and sisters that are incarcerated,

53:21

whether it be those that are living on housed,

53:24

whether it be those that are living as undocumented

53:26

workers in our Latino communities, are our

53:28

Korean communities and our Thai communities, etcetera.

53:31

They are being taxed without representation.

53:34

That's tyranny. UM. Los Angeles

53:36

was built on the labor of our brown brothers

53:39

and sisters. They don't have a voice right

53:41

now, they don't have a say. But then what

53:43

the Democratic Party and machine does in California

53:46

is because we're California and diverse.

53:48

Instead of putting and

53:50

instead of putting like older white people

53:52

in office to to

53:54

to go ahead and do what they want, they put people

53:57

that look like the people in their communities

53:59

to this eve them and say, hey,

54:01

they're actually legislating on your behalf.

54:03

But they're completely not My

54:06

My opponent says he's all for the immigrant

54:08

communities, but he's the one who voted

54:11

to initially authorizing fund ICE. And

54:14

it's like people people

54:16

don't really go in deeper into

54:18

who they're voting for, and they just think, oh, the

54:20

person looks like our community, so

54:22

we're going to vote for him. No, the Democrats,

54:25

and I didn't mean to turn this into a

54:27

democratic machine, but what

54:30

I was about to do. So that's what that's

54:32

what they're that's what they're doing in California.

54:35

They're finding little puppets to put into

54:37

place to keep the people under control.

54:39

Like that's not right. Yeah, no,

54:42

no, no no. I I'm thrilled that you

54:44

brought this up because the next thing I wanted to talk to

54:46

you about was Jimmy Gomez.

54:49

He's the Democratic incumbent

54:52

currently holding district um

54:56

uh and so yeah, I wanted you

54:58

to talk a little bit about him. Um.

55:00

And of your experience is

55:03

running a against a Democratic

55:06

incumbent more about elucidated,

55:08

more about what you were just saying, essentially,

55:10

um, what this has been like? And yeah,

55:13

I guess just a uh tag

55:15

on just sort of your perception of dealing

55:17

with like the Democratic Party in general. And

55:20

if there's a sense

55:23

of you can get a sense

55:25

like everyone like there's a lot of frustration

55:27

from the party when people

55:29

show up to point out that they're not

55:31

doing anything or enough and better

55:34

things are possible. Basically is

55:37

a message they're they're really they're really shy

55:39

about um, and you

55:41

can you can get that sense in a lot of these

55:44

races across the country where people

55:46

are challenging incumbents for not doing the things that

55:48

we need to do. Yeah,

55:51

one of the

55:53

main or one of the very good reasons

55:55

for running for office and challenging and incumbent

55:58

is to off

56:00

the message, hey, like, the people

56:02

are holding you accountable and

56:04

if you continue not to do what the people

56:07

want or what you've promised, then

56:09

there's a possibility that you can be

56:11

voted out of office. And so that

56:13

public accountability is what helps

56:15

our elected officials come closer to the needle

56:18

too. Closer to being aligned with why

56:20

they were elected into office in the first place.

56:23

Um, Jimmy might have been a great he's

56:25

he's I have nothing personal against him. I've never met him.

56:28

He he might have been a great perhaps

56:31

and even greater leader, or

56:33

or a leader with qualifications. And I don't even

56:35

know what the qualifications are. I'm not saying

56:37

that there are certain qualifications and I fit that. But

56:40

he probably wasn't even ten times

56:42

a hundred times potential as

56:44

as a greater leader than I was when he started. But right

56:47

now where he's at like it's

56:49

completely gone. There's no fuel left for the

56:51

people because and how do I know that?

56:53

Because he continues to vote according

56:55

to party politic interests. Yes,

56:57

he's a self alleged progressive. Yes, he's in

56:59

this EPC, the Progressional Caucus. But

57:01

what does that mean? Does that mean that

57:03

he co sponsors and supports Representative

57:05

il han O Mar's rent cancelation more

57:08

rent and mortgage cancelation? Nah? What

57:10

does that mean? That means he supports

57:13

he supports a hundred billion dollar

57:15

rent relief fund that benefits landlords and

57:17

that requires tenants to jump through hoops

57:19

to prove that they don't have money to pay rent and

57:22

put food on the table. He's for that. He's

57:24

not for uh. He's for means

57:27

tested cash relief UM

57:29

and not a universal basic income that could

57:31

go straight to the pockets of people. There's

57:34

a multiple bills out there, whether it be a Senator

57:36

Kamala Harris's bill or Representative

57:39

Rashida to Leive her

57:41

ABC bill, which is two thousand dollars recurring

57:44

monthly cash relief UM.

57:46

He's not the type of person that's doing that yet.

57:48

He's going around saying I'm progressive. But

57:51

what we've noticed now since March is

57:54

he's actually and if he's listening

57:56

to this, I'm glad you're listening. But

57:58

he's putting he's listening to you are campaign

58:00

now because once we started

58:03

doing a life a life stoop for COVID

58:05

nineteen relief to our constituents,

58:07

he started doing one. Once we started doing a

58:09

tech banking campaign UM

58:11

sending sending resources

58:13

to our constituents on what where to go if

58:16

they're unable to pay rent, he started doing that.

58:18

When we started doing ms on Instagram,

58:20

he started doing that. UM. Interesting

58:23

the other day I heard that he

58:26

was very mad that this lefty

58:29

Uh Progressive writer

58:32

podcast how he um he

58:34

that he wrote an article about us and about

58:36

our campaign, and he was very mad that

58:38

that he was saying that we were more progressive than he

58:40

was. And so so if

58:43

that gets him to if that gets him

58:45

to do his job, I'm glad

58:47

and happy that he is. And so I was actually

58:49

surprised that he voted yes

58:51

to defund the Pentagon by ten percent last

58:53

week, and I was like, a good job,

58:56

jim, I mean felt

58:59

certainly take some credit for that. Well,

59:01

because everything you've been saying up to this point

59:03

has been like, oh, he saw our campaign and he

59:06

uh is doing the aesthetic thing

59:08

or like the actually the campaign thing. He's looking at

59:10

your campaign to see what you're doing as

59:12

a function in campaign, not

59:14

saying like, oh, I should also support

59:17

medicare for all, Oh I should also support

59:19

this. But that's actually like kind

59:21

of wild that he did. Yeah,

59:23

And then and we're gonna and I'm thankful that

59:25

he did vote that way, and I give props

59:28

to Jimmy. Jimmy, thank you for voting that way.

59:30

Um, but we're going to continue pushing him. I know

59:32

that he was supporting the United States

59:34

Postal service. If that's the case, why did

59:36

you take twenty five plus dollars

59:39

in money from UPS a

59:41

private competitor? So

59:43

so I so I retweeted

59:45

that yesterday I tweeted his tweet and retweeted,

59:48

why are you taking money from UPS? Then? So

59:50

it's just I get I get that

59:52

you want to make change and make it happen

59:55

and show the people that you're really legislating

59:57

for them. But do that not just

59:59

in these single occurrence moments. Do that as

1:00:01

a career. Do that as a daily lifestyle.

1:00:04

Do that in your heart and intention where it's always

1:00:06

flowing in every interview that you have, like

1:00:08

be that person instead of trying to act like that

1:00:11

person. And so it's also and reacting

1:00:13

to the being challenged, right, It's that

1:00:16

that Elliott Angle comment during

1:00:18

the primary. He says, I if there wasn't a primary, I

1:00:20

wouldn't even care about this, Like you literally said that

1:00:22

that out loud, um.

1:00:24

And if you're only doing these things if

1:00:26

you're challenged, then maybe

1:00:29

it also speaks to why

1:00:31

a person decides to be in office.

1:00:34

If you're just following what you're

1:00:36

told from the establishment, then

1:00:38

you want to be in office because you want power.

1:00:41

You want to be in office because you

1:00:44

like the status or whatever it is,

1:00:46

and you're you know, versus being

1:00:49

an office because you want to help people. Being

1:00:51

in office because you want to

1:00:53

make a difference. Um.

1:00:56

And I mean I think that hearing you

1:00:58

speak for this hour and you're in your background,

1:01:01

it's clear that that's what your focus is. You

1:01:03

know, from your time working

1:01:06

in different capacities as a lawyer, you're like,

1:01:08

it's not about money. It's a I

1:01:10

mean, sure we all have to make money, but it's about

1:01:13

helping people. And

1:01:16

uh, it's just vitally

1:01:18

important that more people like you step

1:01:20

up and and the

1:01:23

bare minimum, we're challenging the

1:01:25

establishment. Um,

1:01:27

but we're also making significant strides

1:01:30

and changing perception of things, and we're

1:01:32

going to get more and more of us in office. Um.

1:01:35

And I think that that is such a positive, hopeful,

1:01:39

inspiring thing to be focusing

1:01:41

on right now and focusing our efforts. There's

1:01:43

a lot of us that are disillusioned with this primary

1:01:46

in terms of the presidential race. Fair

1:01:49

fine, but there are so many people like you

1:01:52

all over this country that

1:01:54

are stepping up and filling this void,

1:01:57

and it's vital that we focus

1:01:59

our our attention on these kinds of races

1:02:01

so that we can make the difference that we want. It's

1:02:04

disappointing that we don't have Bernie

1:02:06

or Yang you know, leading

1:02:09

the ticket right now, but there's

1:02:11

so much progress that's still being

1:02:14

made. Um and it's it's

1:02:16

I think it's important for us right now, emotionally,

1:02:19

spiritually, economically to

1:02:21

remember that, yeah,

1:02:24

you you nailed it, you closed it very well.

1:02:28

They pay me the just fine bucks for that. UM.

1:02:32

Can you please tell our audience where

1:02:35

they can find you online, how they can support

1:02:37

you. I know I'm supporting you. I

1:02:39

am nine sure, I am in your district

1:02:43

and I will be voting for you. Um,

1:02:46

but how how can everybody else support

1:02:48

you? Yeah? Thank you for asking, Katie.

1:02:51

One of the biggest challenges for US is

1:02:53

campaign finance. So obviously

1:02:56

one of our top priorities is to we

1:03:00

form campaign finance where

1:03:02

it's not corporate money that's deciding who gets

1:03:04

elected, but it's where it's truly the people.

1:03:07

UM. So go check out our democracy

1:03:10

Dollars on David Hi dot com

1:03:12

to learn more about that. But as

1:03:15

as a grassroots candidate, a candidate and

1:03:17

a campaign, we are a percent people powered

1:03:20

So while our opponent has

1:03:22

eight percent of his donations being

1:03:25

from corporate interests and big donors and

1:03:27

with a campaign werehist of a million dollars,

1:03:30

we don't have that much money. So if

1:03:32

you're able to chip in, that's great,

1:03:35

go to David dot com

1:03:37

board slash donate UM. But if

1:03:39

you're unable to, that's totally fine. Please

1:03:41

don't donate, like use your money for yourself,

1:03:44

like buy food, pay save it for rent,

1:03:46

take care of yourself. And there's other ways you can help

1:03:48

out, which is volunteering remotely

1:03:51

through our text banking or phone

1:03:53

banking volunteer programs, or it's

1:03:55

even or if it's even calling a friend or

1:03:57

family member in Los Angeles, it's

1:04:00

sharing our websitely and sharing this interview

1:04:02

and saying hey, you want to you want more

1:04:04

podcasts

1:04:06

that there's a great one, worst

1:04:08

year ever, check out this episode,

1:04:10

So do that. UM. There's creative ways

1:04:12

UM to help us in that sense, and so

1:04:15

so volunteer, donate, spread the word, and

1:04:17

it will be very grateful. I definitely will be doing

1:04:20

all of the above. UM. If you've

1:04:22

got those little lawn signs, I'll put him in my

1:04:24

front yard. Yes, yes,

1:04:28

really, really lit up. David,

1:04:32

thank you so much for joining this. This has been a delight.

1:04:34

Um. We will be following this

1:04:37

closely and helping in any way that we can.

1:04:39

Okay, great, thank you so much for having me Katie

1:04:42

so fortun all right, bye

1:04:44

bye, and that does it for us

1:04:46

today on the Worst Year Ever. Please

1:04:50

go check out David's website,

1:04:53

support him in whatever way

1:04:55

you can if you can. Um,

1:04:58

you can check us out online to at

1:05:01

worst your pod on Instagram, on

1:05:03

Twitter, you can follow

1:05:06

us too if you want, and

1:05:08

all that stuff. That's good.

1:05:12

It's true. I could agree with you more, but

1:05:14

I don't know what that would mean. Does

1:05:16

not disagree with me completely, and that's how it's

1:05:18

important. Cool. We'll be back next

1:05:21

week. Leader Everything,

1:05:26

Everything so dumb. It's again

1:05:31

I tried. Worst

1:05:34

Year Ever is a production of I Heart Radio. For

1:05:37

more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the

1:05:39

I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:05:41

or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features