19.49: Getting to Know You

19.49: Getting to Know You

Released Sunday, 8th December 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
19.49: Getting to Know You

19.49: Getting to Know You

19.49: Getting to Know You

19.49: Getting to Know You

Sunday, 8th December 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

When you visit Arizona, time

0:03

is measured in moments, not minutes.

0:05

Like the moment you see the Grand Canyon for

0:07

the first time. Sigh. Visit

0:11

a new state of mind. Learn

0:13

more at hereyouareaz.com Water

0:16

damage is no joke. Did you know that water damage makes

0:18

up more than 25% of all home

0:20

insurance claims and the average claim costs over $13,000? Don't

0:23

let a small leak turn into

0:25

a big expense. Learn more at

0:28

go.pemko.com/no joke. Pemko Mutual Insurance Company,

0:30

Seattle, Washington. Water damage is no joke. Did

0:32

you know that water damage makes up more than 25% of

0:35

all home insurance claims and the average claim costs over $13,000?

0:38

Don't let a small leak turn into a

0:41

big expense. Learn more at go.pemko. To keep

0:43

pets happy and healthy all season

0:45

long. If

0:48

you're a maintenance supervisor for a commercial property,

0:50

you've had to deal with everything from leaky

0:52

faucets to flickering light bulbs. But nothing's worse

0:54

than that ancient boiler that's lived in the

0:56

building since the day it was built. 50

0:59

years ago, it's enough to make

1:02

anyone lose their cool. That's where

1:04

Grainger comes in. With industrial-grade products

1:06

and dependable fast delivery, Grainger can

1:08

help with any challenge. From worn-out

1:10

components to everyday necessities, call

1:12

clickrainger.com or just stop by Grainger for

1:14

the ones who get it done. This episode

1:17

of Writing Excuses has been brought to

1:19

you by our listeners, patrons. This man

1:21

to be your husband. I do.

1:25

Welcome home. We did it. He

1:29

has your eyes. He's perfect.

1:31

slash Make the most of

1:33

them all with PenFed Checking and Savings

1:35

accounts. Learn more at penfed.org. This is

1:37

Getting Federally insured by NCOA. To receive any advertised

1:40

product, you must become a member of

1:42

PenFed Credit Union. PenFed's got great rates

1:44

for everyone. And

1:48

we are And we be be talking

1:50

about using elements of romance

1:52

in your story. This does not,

1:54

I have to say, necessarily mean that

1:56

you have to have a love

1:58

story or even romantic, attack. You

2:01

can use romance elements for this

2:03

is what buddy films are. It

2:05

is the coming together as a

2:07

team, as a couple, as hey

2:09

we have a bond. And so

2:11

we're going to be talking about

2:13

some of the tools that you

2:15

can use when you're doing that.

2:17

One of them we foreshadowed last

2:19

week when we talked about the

2:21

meat cube. The

2:24

Meet Cute. This is a romance trope

2:27

in which your characters meet each other.

2:29

Does anyone want to chime in and

2:31

talk a little bit about how these...

2:33

So they both walk into the flesh

2:36

box. Wow. Cyberpunk story now. Right. Or

2:38

the new Netflix reality TV show. So

2:40

I think what I like about, so

2:43

I love a good romance, and what

2:45

I like about meat cutes is there

2:47

usually a situation in which there's a

2:49

tiny amount of tension because something is

2:52

kind of going wrong. Like the cute

2:54

part is like, my dogs got away

2:56

from me and they jumped on you,

2:59

or like, I almost spilled that coffee

3:01

on you. It's something very small. And

3:03

one character is able to put the

3:06

other one at ease, and the way

3:08

that they approach it shows that there's

3:10

something that's very sympathico in the way

3:12

that they deal with the world, see

3:15

the world, or deal with conflict. And

3:17

I think that helps to foreshadow the

3:19

way that they will deal with each

3:22

other going forward. That is a great

3:24

way to describe it. other thing that

3:26

I think that happens about that is

3:28

that there's always, in addition to the

3:31

thing going wrong, and that moment of,

3:33

oh yes, I care about you, there's

3:35

the desire for that connection to linger,

3:38

and there's usually some revelation about something

3:40

that they have in common. something that

3:42

is an unexpected thing that they have

3:45

in common. It's like, oh, we both

3:47

go to the same gym, or what,

3:49

your grandmother's name is Amelda as well?

3:51

You know, it's some, some common thing

3:54

that, that starts to, is kind of

3:56

the first thing that's cementing the friendship.

3:58

You mentioned how romances and buddy cop

4:01

films, you know, buddy films, right, are

4:03

both. some level fundamentally the same formula.

4:05

I pose the question, what does the

4:07

meat cute look like in a buddy

4:10

cop film? And it may end up

4:12

being something like these two law enforcement

4:14

officers or these two professionals at arms

4:17

both come to the same scene from

4:19

different agencies and there is gun play

4:21

and there is a little bit of

4:23

mutual respect and then, oh no, you

4:26

two have to be partners. I work

4:28

alone and off we go. I think

4:30

one thing that's really important about the

4:33

meet cute is it forces the characters

4:35

to actually interact, right, and interact about

4:37

something. There's so many times where I'll

4:40

read a book and I feel like

4:42

the authors assuming that these two characters

4:44

are in the same space, they're working

4:46

at the same office, they're both in

4:49

the same patrol car, therefore there's a

4:51

relationship, right? But we as the audience

4:53

are not seeing that interaction. We're not

4:56

getting a sense of that relationship. So

4:58

the meet-cute, by having a thing that

5:00

goes wrong in it, again, we're talking

5:02

about sort of like those little micro-trops

5:05

we talked about last episode, where there's

5:07

almost like that thriller component of like,

5:09

oh no, something has happened. But the

5:12

end result is one where we're leaning

5:14

into interaction as opposed to a plot

5:16

event and a plot hook in that

5:18

way, right? So those characters interacting, having

5:21

a conversation, you know, one person solving

5:23

a problem for another person and then

5:25

leaving us on a note where it's

5:28

like, oh, there's possibility for future interaction

5:30

here because they share something in common

5:32

or they exchange numbers or some aspect

5:35

of it that lets us carry that

5:37

thread into the future, right? So you

5:39

really want to make sure as you're

5:41

exiting that interaction that there's something that

5:44

carries us without event with momentum. I

5:46

don't want to get into a long

5:48

definitional conversation about what is and isn't

5:51

a meet cute. So I'm just going

5:53

to say, this is a different kind

5:55

of meeting now to talk about because

5:57

there's one thing that you also see

6:00

in a lot of relationship stories is

6:02

not the cute meeting. they kind of

6:04

have some common ground that they can

6:07

see, but the odd couple meeting, where

6:09

they are forced into conflict with each

6:11

other. This is really common, I think,

6:14

in a lot of buddy comedies because

6:16

they have that sense of budding heads

6:18

until they become friends, but you see

6:20

this in romance as well all the

6:23

time. You asked about Howard, you know,

6:25

what does the meeting look like in

6:27

a buddy comedy? for my money, the

6:30

best buddy comedy ever is The Nice

6:32

Guys by Shane Black. And that, you

6:34

know, the time the two characters meet

6:36

is when Russell Crow breaks into Ryan

6:39

Gosling's house and breaks his arm. Like,

6:41

that sets them up as antagonists and

6:43

then we get to watch them come

6:46

together and become friends. I think. to

6:48

build on what you're saying about the

6:50

kind of buddy, because I had the

6:52

same thought, like it's like they're forced

6:55

in the same patrol car, but I

6:57

think it's like a moment of intrigue

6:59

in the like most blase version of

7:02

that, which is that like, oh, we

7:04

maybe have something in common. Again, it's

7:06

fine in the commonality. It's the like,

7:09

you do things by the book and

7:11

I like to just shoot things, but

7:13

also we both like kittens. It's about

7:15

finding the commonality in an unexpected place.

7:18

So whereas a meet-cut is, I never

7:20

thought I would meet you here today,

7:22

in a buddy film, I think it's

7:25

more like, I never thought I would

7:27

find anything interesting about you who I

7:29

have already met. Or any respect for

7:31

you in some way. So there's this

7:34

theory that my mother-in-law has, which I

7:36

call the co-all relationship axes based on

7:38

her. I was dating advice that she

7:41

gave to my husband, but it's great

7:43

for characters, which is that if you

7:45

think about these as sliders, the more

7:48

things you have in common, the greater

7:50

your compatibility is. So it's mind, money,

7:52

morals, manners, monogamy, and mirth. So mind

7:54

is that the closer they are in

7:57

intelligence, the more compatible they are. Money,

7:59

same opinion. about money,

8:01

what it's used for, not necessarily

8:03

the same amount of money. Morals,

8:05

the same ideas of what is

8:08

right and wrong. Manors is the

8:10

same idea of what is polite,

8:12

correct behavior. So this is why

8:14

you can have someone that you

8:16

get along with, they're so charming

8:19

in person and terrible monsters on

8:21

the internet. Because there are morals

8:23

and morals are completely opposed, but

8:25

your manners are aligned. Monogamy is

8:27

not actually, you have to be

8:30

monogamous, but you have the same

8:32

idea of what the relationship is.

8:34

You all have had the person

8:36

that totally thinks that you're BFFS

8:39

and you're just like, we kind

8:41

of vaguely know each other. and

8:43

then mirth that you have the

8:45

same sense of humor. And so

8:47

you only have to tip one

8:50

of those off just a little

8:52

bit, one or two of them

8:54

off to have like major conflicts

8:56

and fractures. When you look at

8:58

Lizzy and Darcy, from Jane Austen's

9:01

Pred and Prejudice, they are actually

9:03

really closely aligned on pretty much

9:05

everything except manners, because of her

9:07

family, and a little bit on

9:09

mirth. And then when the proposal

9:12

scene happens, they're wildly disaligned on

9:14

monogamy. Excuse me while I spend

9:16

the rest of this episode having

9:18

a minor crisis about my last

9:20

few relationships. Sorry, well. Let me

9:23

ease your mind a little bit.

9:25

Okay? Where does one find a

9:27

meat cue these days? I've been

9:29

going to the park and it's

9:31

all on the internet. So to

9:34

ease your mind a little bit

9:36

because while this is true, I

9:38

also think that there is a

9:40

lot to be said for the

9:43

half orange. I talk about this

9:45

a lot in relationships. That what

9:47

a person, what a character really

9:49

needs is the other half of

9:51

themselves. And someone who completes them,

9:54

someone who has all the qualities

9:56

they don't have so that together

9:58

they are a single complete person.

10:00

you need to be aligned, you

10:02

need to think about some of

10:05

the things in the same way,

10:07

but also, you very specifically, I

10:09

think, need to have someone who

10:11

can do things you can't do,

10:13

who thinks of things in a

10:16

way that you don't. One of

10:18

the things that I love about

10:20

this is it does not talk

10:22

about personality. So, introvert-extrovert? Yeah, absolutely.

10:24

I completely agree with you that

10:27

you need someone who balances you,

10:29

that you need someone who balances

10:31

you, I think. The title of

10:33

this episode, Getting to Know You,

10:35

I'm ready to visit that in

10:38

a little more detail after our

10:40

break. Hey friends, the 2025 retreat

10:42

registration is open. We have two

10:44

amazing writing retreats coming up and

10:47

we cordially invite you to enroll

10:49

in them. For those of you

10:51

who sign up before January 12th,

10:53

2025, how is that even a

10:55

real date? We're off... As

11:03

you can probably hear my cat

11:05

say, we've got a special treat

11:07

for our friends. We're offering a

11:09

little something special to sweeten the

11:11

pot. You'll be able to join

11:14

several of my fellow writing excuses

11:16

hosts and me on a Zoom

11:18

early bird meet and greet call

11:20

to chit-chat, meet fellow writers, ask

11:22

questions, and get even more excited

11:24

about writing excuses retreats. To qualify

11:27

to join the early bird meet

11:29

and greet, all you need to

11:31

do is register to join a

11:33

writing excuses retreat. Either our regenerate

11:35

retreat in June or our annual

11:38

cruise in September 2025. Just register

11:40

by January 12th. Learn more at

11:42

writing excuses.com/retreats. Today I

11:44

want to talk to you about the

11:47

podcast, Ancient History Fan Girl. It's a

11:49

history podcast, and the hosts tell you

11:51

history through story. Ancient historical figures like

11:54

Julius Caesar, Cleopatra, Budica, and even the

11:56

mythological Kukolan have felt more like real

11:58

people to me as they did when

12:01

Jen and Jenny told me their stories

12:03

and brought them to life. They do

12:05

in-depth research and then weave it into

12:08

a fantastic way to learn more about

12:10

history. They have a lot of seasons

12:12

and episodes, so I suggest finding a

12:15

season or an arc that appeals to

12:17

you. I started with their Skithian episode

12:19

and I highly recommend it. You can

12:22

find them on any major podcast platforms

12:24

or at Ancient History fangirl.com. Water

12:27

damage is no joke. Did you know that water damage makes

12:29

up more than 25% of all home

12:31

insurance claims? And the average claim costs over $13,000? Don't

12:35

let a small leak turn into

12:37

a big expense. Learn more at

12:39

go.pemco.com/no joke. Pemco Mutual Insurance Company,

12:42

Seattle. So

12:58

getting to know you, there

13:01

are two aspects to this.

13:03

One is the characters growing

13:05

in character knowledge about each

13:08

other, and the other is

13:10

the reader gaining knowledge about

13:12

these characters. And you have

13:15

to pull off both. You

13:17

can't just say, You know,

13:19

A, now knew all about

13:22

B, you have to give

13:24

the reader something to chew

13:26

on, something to enjoy. I

13:30

have a tool for that, which is looking

13:32

at the escalation, the arc of the relationship.

13:34

One of the reasons that the Meet Cute

13:36

works is that it is the disruption of

13:38

the normal going back to our thriller episode.

13:40

But there's this other thing called Dream, which

13:42

I learned from Elizabeth Boyle, Denial Resistance Exploration

13:44

Acceptance and Manifestation. So this is the arc

13:46

that a person goes She got got

13:48

it from an anger

13:50

management class but then

13:52

class a romance writer a

13:55

she's like oh this

13:57

is the oh building

13:59

block of every romance

14:01

ever ever. So denial is that they deny

14:03

is that they deny

14:05

that there's any kind

14:07

of problem at all

14:09

And what you do

14:11

is you pick an

14:13

externalization of that of pick

14:15

an action that the

14:17

character takes takes which

14:19

they are clinging to that original identity

14:21

and it's like and who would go out

14:23

with would go out with him? You know,

14:26

and so make very, they're they're gonna be at

14:28

what? at No, I'm definitely not going to that.

14:30

not going to action do they

14:32

take? do they And then resistance,

14:34

that's when you when you, you that. that,

14:36

okay, I see I see why some people find him

14:39

attractive, but I would never date him. would never date

14:41

him. is where you start

14:43

to think about it just

14:45

a little bit. All right, right,

14:47

well, maybe one date. And then acceptance

14:49

is, oh no, I've been left. And

14:53

then matrimony is what you do with

14:55

that, excuse me, a me, is what what you

14:57

do with that. In that. a classic

14:59

romance, it's matrimony. But if you

15:01

think about the end of of Casablanca, when

15:03

realizes that he is that he is in

15:05

love with that she's and that she's still

15:07

in love with him, his and his

15:09

manifestation is not matrimony, it's to off

15:11

her off and to take himself

15:14

away, because that is actually what's best

15:16

for everybody that's involved. So what

15:18

you do with that knowledge, the action

15:20

that you take, and what's fun and

15:22

what's that you can go through this

15:24

cycle multiple times in a single book. cycle

15:26

What I see people do a lot

15:28

is that the characters will just hang

15:30

out in denial and then suddenly they

15:33

get married. the characters will I found

15:35

that, out in denial and then

15:37

suddenly they get years

15:39

of being married of

15:41

probably taught me

15:43

some of this, taught me

15:45

some of this. of of... one

15:49

understanding of another. of

15:51

another are are usually, usually.

15:54

take the shape of actions.

15:56

of actions. I mean, okay, blow my own

15:58

my own horn little. bit here.

16:00

The whole cast went out falconing

16:03

in the cold except for me

16:05

and I made a point of

16:07

arriving at the house with hot

16:10

drinks because I knew everyone would

16:12

be cold. You were correct. Was

16:14

that thoughtful? Well, okay, yes, sure,

16:17

but the fact that I was

16:19

thinking about these other people and

16:21

had an idea of what they

16:23

would need And the

16:26

fact that, uh, the fact that

16:28

they trusted me to bring something

16:30

that they could drink, that gives

16:33

us a picture of a relationship.

16:35

Wow, these people are friends. These,

16:38

they like each other in a

16:40

way that us saying, oh, thank

16:42

you so much for the stuff.

16:45

Oh, you're welcome. Just doesn't. Having

16:48

covered some of the tools, can

16:50

we dive into another one of

16:52

the classic tropes of the category?

16:54

Yes. So one of my favorite

16:57

setups is always the enemies or

16:59

rivals who are caught in each

17:01

other's orbit who have to build

17:03

a relationship grow to some kind

17:05

of understanding or accord by the

17:07

end, if not full-on romance. And

17:09

to me, this is always such

17:11

an interesting dynamic because you, you

17:13

know, as we were talking about,

17:15

you need to have the understanding

17:17

between the characters, but you also

17:19

need the audience understanding of these

17:21

individuals as well. And so often,

17:24

one is more in focus than

17:26

the other, so we're getting the

17:28

perspective of our protagonist and only

17:30

bit by bit are we learning

17:32

more information about the rival to

17:34

begin to understand where they come

17:36

from and why they are. So

17:38

it's almost like building the romance.

17:40

for the reader in addition to

17:42

building the romance for the character.

17:44

Because initially we're like, well, that

17:46

person's a jerk. They're being so

17:49

mean to the person I like.

17:51

They might be hot, but like,

17:53

I hate them. And so learning

17:55

bit by a bit why we

17:57

could respect them or be interested

17:59

in them, I think is one

18:01

of the delicious parts of this

18:03

category. Yeah, you can also use

18:05

other characters as a foil there.

18:07

So it's like you've got the

18:09

rival who's a jerk, but they

18:11

you've got like the truly evil,

18:14

like not even rival, like person

18:16

who makes the rival seem like,

18:18

well, they, I don't agree with

18:20

their tactics maybe, but at least

18:22

I understand where they're coming from,

18:24

unlike this new person. It's one

18:26

of the things I loved growing

18:28

up, watching soap operas, was that

18:30

there are always characters in different

18:32

stages of romance, so that you

18:34

always, there's always, so you know,

18:36

like when you see two. people

18:39

interacting, you're like, oh, this fits

18:41

into this type of romance. I'm

18:43

not going to mistake this couple

18:45

falling in love for a married

18:47

couple because I have another example

18:49

on the page. And it's also

18:51

a way to give you something

18:53

like, oh, this is something for

18:55

this new couple to aim for.

18:57

So I'm excited to see them

18:59

make this journey down the line.

19:01

Yeah, and one of the things

19:04

that I think that goes with

19:06

that with the couple that's making

19:08

the journey tying back into what

19:10

you were talking about with the

19:12

the friends to lovers or variations

19:14

of that is that there's there's

19:16

always some like catalyst action that

19:18

is happening. And there's a point

19:20

at which there's a point at

19:22

which everything gets recontextualized for the

19:24

POV character. where they've been watching

19:26

this thing happening and then they're

19:29

suddenly like, oh, this person that

19:31

I thought was an asshole is

19:33

actually leaving abruptly because he's taking

19:35

care of his aging mother. Or,

19:37

you know, when, again, Darcy and

19:39

Elizabeth, when she suddenly realizes the

19:41

reason he's been such a jerk

19:43

to Wickham is because of his

19:45

history with his sister. And that's

19:47

like recontextualizes every interaction that she's

19:49

had with them up to that

19:51

point. And that's one of my

19:53

favorite things is that recontextualization. One

19:56

of the things that I love

19:58

about this type of relationship, at

20:00

least for me, it's one of

20:02

the things that separates it from

20:04

odd couple. Odd couple is these

20:06

two people, their personalities clash. One

20:08

of them's. one of them is

20:10

clean, whatever it is. Whereas kind

20:12

of enemies and rivals, there are

20:14

enemies to lovers. They are specifically

20:16

opposed to each other. And they

20:18

are trying to one up each

20:21

other, or they're trying to attack

20:23

each other, or whatever it is.

20:25

And what that allows you to

20:27

do is crank the competence of

20:29

both characters way, way up. Higher

20:31

than you could do in a

20:33

lot or most other relationships. And

20:35

that helps build that reader attachment.

20:37

We don't like this person. but

20:39

we also kind of really love

20:41

this person because they are so

20:43

good at being terrible that when

20:46

you get to whatever point midway

20:48

or two-thirds of the way through

20:50

the story where suddenly they find

20:52

themselves on the same side, we

20:54

know that they're going to be

20:56

an incredible team because we've watched

20:58

them be incredible on their own.

21:00

Now let's say for a moment

21:02

that you're not writing a buddy

21:04

show, you're not writing a romance,

21:06

you are writing horror, you are

21:08

writing a thriller, you are writing

21:11

a mystery. All of these tools

21:13

apply and you can go all

21:15

Jordi Laforge and flip the polarity

21:17

and have the trope be allies

21:19

to enemies and it works exactly

21:21

the same way. The more they

21:23

learn about each other, there's a

21:25

twist, there's a reveal, and now

21:27

we have a broken relationship at

21:29

the end. Yeah. Yeah,

21:31

it's funny thinking about when you

21:34

were mentioning the genres, I was

21:36

thinking, you know, fantasy and science

21:38

fiction, I think character relationships and

21:40

dynamics are really at the heart

21:42

of a lot of the classics,

21:45

like your crew that's going out

21:47

into space, like, how do they

21:49

get along with each other? This

21:51

person doesn't quite like this person,

21:53

but they accept that they're watching

21:56

this. happening and then they're suddenly

21:58

like, oh, this person that I

22:00

thought was an asshole is actually

22:02

leaving abruptly because he's taking care

22:04

of his aging mother. Or, you

22:06

know, when, again, Darcy and Elizabeth,

22:09

when she suddenly realizes the reason

22:11

he's been such a jerk to

22:13

Wickham is because of his, of

22:15

his, the history, the history with

22:17

his sister. And that's like recontextualizes

22:20

every interaction that she's happened. That's

22:22

a good time for what's going

22:24

on in their relationship. Is there

22:26

a small thing that can happen,

22:28

that can make two people grow

22:31

closer together or further apart, then

22:33

makes your story like, come alive

22:35

to you a little bit as

22:37

you explore how they like each

22:39

other or don't? I think that

22:42

that brings us to our homework.

22:44

So your homework for this week

22:46

is in this scene, the one

22:48

that you're working on right now,

22:50

what is something that your character

22:53

finds attractive about the other person

22:55

in the scene? And note, this

22:57

does not need to be a

22:59

romantic attraction. And then the other

23:01

thing is, what does your character

23:03

think is their own least attractive

23:06

trait and how can you make

23:08

them more anxious about that right

23:10

now? This has been writing excuses.

23:12

You're out of excuses. Now go

23:14

right. Have you ever wanted to

23:17

ask one of the writing excuses

23:19

hosts for very specific, very you-focused

23:21

help? There's an offering on the

23:23

writing excuses patron that will let

23:25

you do exactly that. The private

23:28

instruction tier includes everything from the

23:30

lower tiers, plus a quarterly one-on-one

23:32

zoom meeting with a host of

23:34

your choice. You might choose, for

23:36

example, to work with me on

23:39

your humorous prose. Engage Dong-Wan's expertise

23:41

on your world building. Or study

23:43

with Aaron to level up your

23:45

game writing. Visit patreon.com/writing excuses for

23:47

more details. Writing excuses has been

23:49

brought to you by our listeners,

23:52

patrons, and friends. For this episode,

23:54

your hosts were Mary Robinette Kowal,

23:56

Donguan Song. Roberts, Dan

23:58

and Howard Taylor. This

24:00

This episode was

24:03

engineered by Marshal

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features