Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome back everybody to You
0:02
Have Permission, the show that
0:04
aims to take both Christianity
0:06
and the modern world of
0:08
science and culture very seriously.
0:10
And we're going to get
0:13
to this in a minute.
0:15
I would argue, Josh Gilbert,
0:17
Joy Vetterline, team members,
0:19
thank you for being here,
0:21
I would argue you guys,
0:23
that there is maybe no public
0:26
figure. Very few public figures
0:28
of the last hundred years
0:30
or so that have
0:32
embodied taking Christianity and
0:35
the modern world of
0:37
science and culture. Seriously,
0:40
then the recently deceased
0:42
Pope Francis, may he rest
0:44
in peace. Quick agree, disagree
0:47
on that. Josh. Hard soft,
0:49
sure, barely agree, joy. I
0:51
think I'm a solid, if you
0:54
say so, I don't feel like
0:56
I know enough about his life
0:58
and legacy to comment on that,
1:01
but I, yes, it does seem
1:03
as he has changed the
1:06
stereotype of what a Pope
1:08
does significantly, even though
1:10
I have been pretty
1:13
removed from his specific
1:15
policies and changes.
1:17
Of course, here with Joy
1:19
Vedderline, our sub-stack and social
1:22
media, Guru and Josh Gilbert,
1:24
editor, extraordinary, occasional co-producer with
1:26
me on various projects, and
1:28
we are doing a couple
1:30
things today, a little housekeeping
1:32
up top, a little talk about
1:35
the Pope who just passed away a day
1:37
or two ago as we're recording this.
1:39
Then we're going to mostly use
1:41
this to talk about the results.
1:43
So we recently had that. episode
1:45
like where should we go from here
1:47
what what do you guys want to
1:50
hear about and we got a bunch
1:52
of results poll results feedback survey feedback
1:54
what's what number are we up to
1:56
joy can do you see the updated
1:59
results we got 166 responses. Thank you
2:01
to everyone who took the time.
2:03
Which I think is awesome and
2:05
a nice probably representative of the
2:07
listenership. It's a big enough number
2:09
that we can draw some good
2:11
conclusions from it and a couple
2:13
patrons of the show in the
2:15
Facebook group asked for like hey
2:17
could we do an episode where
2:20
we discuss those findings a little
2:22
bit and we had been kind
2:24
of talking about we need to
2:26
have a meeting and talk about
2:28
them so we're just gonna record
2:30
that meeting it'll be for patrons
2:32
it's gonna be a little bit
2:34
seed of our pants but but
2:36
we've been thinking about the especially
2:38
joy and I've been thinking about
2:40
and I've been thinking about and
2:42
looking through the results Josh I'll
2:44
be curious to hear what you've
2:47
been thinking about as well so
2:49
we've got some kind of preliminary
2:51
takeaways from it. And also I
2:53
think we get a nice picture
2:55
of the listenership. And so we're
2:57
going to talk a little bit
2:59
about who are you guys? Who
3:01
are you that are that are
3:03
doing this walking this road with
3:05
us? But first some housekeeping. So
3:07
I'm still in this doctoral internship.
3:09
It ends at the end of
3:12
July. And I would say for
3:14
listeners, you can expect things to
3:16
start picking up kind of around
3:18
then around July. By August September
3:20
I think we are going to
3:22
be doing another two or three
3:24
episodes per month than we're doing
3:26
right now So the current plan
3:28
is to have weekly full main
3:30
feed episodes like we did before
3:32
internship and then two or three
3:34
Patron episodes coming out on Thursdays
3:36
or Fridays I do have an
3:39
idea that I stubbornly am trying
3:41
to get to stick which is
3:43
to release episodes on Thursdays that
3:45
are called casual Fridays, the only
3:47
casual Friday to occur on a
3:49
Thursday. Can we do another survey
3:51
just to see what people think
3:53
of that idea? Because clearly my
3:55
opinion means nothing to you. Apparently,
3:57
yeah, I may just bulldoze my
3:59
way through with that. It rolls
4:01
right off the sun, no. And
4:03
also probably mid-summer, late summer, start
4:06
rolling out some of these ideas
4:08
that we discussed in that where...
4:10
should we go from here episode?
4:12
Some of them are like a
4:14
little less labor intensive and I
4:16
might be able to kind of
4:18
get the wheels moving on that
4:20
even during late stages of internship.
4:22
So finally just a huge thank
4:24
you everybody who has supported me
4:26
and us through this insane year.
4:28
just a quick reminder like this
4:31
year is like I'm gone eight
4:33
to five 30 Monday through Friday
4:35
and we got two boys under
4:37
six to care for on either
4:39
end of that and so that's
4:41
why I've been recording episodes I
4:43
recorded a bunch before internship I've
4:45
basically taken two separate weeks off
4:47
of work and recorded podcasts all
4:49
week to keep up with even
4:51
just having one per week to
4:53
sort of that's the bare minimum
4:55
for the show so appreciate everybody's
4:58
patience there and support. So I
5:00
want to do. a few minutes
5:02
on Pope Francis. I will say
5:04
at the moment I'm thinking of
5:06
doing at least two episodes focused
5:08
on Pope Francis in the future,
5:10
like full length episodes. One, I'd
5:12
like to do with another Protestant
5:14
and I haven't emailed her yet
5:16
but I'm going to ask Bonnie
5:18
Christian for instance because she's got
5:20
this kind of global lens. She
5:23
writes about foreign policy, she writes
5:25
about sort of global Christianity for
5:27
Christianity and other outlets. I'd love
5:29
to kind of see what she's
5:31
thinking about this in terms of
5:33
what Pope Francis meant to Protestants,
5:35
and then I'd love to do
5:37
an episode with a Catholic. And
5:39
I've got a couple ideas there.
5:41
What did Francis mean to Catholics?
5:43
And I think that that's going
5:45
to be a different answer. So
5:47
that's going to be a more
5:50
robust and we'll have a little
5:52
bit more time to think about
5:54
it, but I thought it would
5:56
be cool to do some kind
5:58
of quick thoughts, some quick reaction,
6:00
and I thought we would start
6:02
with the two of you things
6:04
to share. So the question that
6:06
I want to ask you because
6:08
I understand that neither of you
6:10
have sort of read about him,
6:12
thought about him, kind of dealt
6:14
with him as much as I
6:17
have, and I have probably thought
6:19
about him more than 90% of
6:21
non-catholics or more in the world.
6:23
And so I want to turn
6:25
that into something that we can
6:27
use. So as people interested in
6:29
Christianity and religion, but not particularly
6:31
focused on the minutiae of Pope
6:33
Francis's tenure in the Vatican, what
6:35
was your basic take on him?
6:37
Like what was your basic sense
6:39
of what who Pope Francis was,
6:42
what he meant to the Catholic
6:44
Church or... the world more broadly.
6:46
Joy, let's start with you so
6:48
that we can really center your
6:50
voice and your opinions as important,
6:52
unlike for the casual Fridays thing.
6:54
Well, yeah, any time I hear
6:56
of someone passing, I want to
6:58
honor the life they lived. I
7:00
didn't have a lot of connection
7:02
to the Catholic Church throughout my
7:04
life, I think. like a lot
7:06
of evangelicals I was taught they
7:09
weren't the quote unquote real Christians.
7:11
We were. So, but just getting
7:13
out of that and realizing just
7:15
the global impact of the Catholic
7:17
Church, it's massive. And I remember
7:19
when he came up just hearing
7:21
that he was more progressive than
7:23
a lot of previous popes. And
7:25
I want to say that when
7:27
that was happening, I'm not sure
7:29
that I was somebody who identified
7:31
with the word progressive or necessarily
7:34
thought that progressively good. I don't
7:36
remember that quite the timing, but
7:38
my very vague takeaway of this
7:40
is just, yeah, I think that
7:42
there... I think of him as
7:44
someone who made progress in areas
7:46
that really needed some progress and
7:48
that there were some areas where
7:50
he didn't make as much progress
7:52
as many people wish he had.
7:54
There are still some things where
7:56
he was kind of sticking to
7:58
maybe some old traditions that felt
8:01
a little bit. Yeah, less freeing
8:03
for... certain members of his church
8:05
population. So I think my question
8:07
now is seeing so many shifts
8:09
around the world, not just in
8:11
our country's government, but in other,
8:13
I think they're calling it populist
8:15
movements. What does that mean for,
8:17
you know, who's the current? makeup
8:19
of the people who will select
8:21
the new. I'm wondering about that
8:23
too. Were there people there who
8:25
appreciated what he was doing or
8:28
felt like he was going too
8:30
far, is there going to be
8:32
a reactionary, you know, not, I
8:34
get, I don't even know that
8:36
dad this is not. Here, let
8:38
me, well I'll pick up that
8:40
thread, I'll pick up that thread
8:42
because I thought about it too.
8:44
And I don't know if I'm
8:46
just like, if it's a defense
8:48
mechanism. to like assume that there
8:50
will be a conservative backlash within
8:53
the papacy and who is selected.
8:55
My understanding is that it's maybe
8:57
not generally quite as much of
8:59
a pendulum ping pong as like
9:01
the United States political system tends
9:03
to be where every time we
9:05
get a new administration we blame
9:07
them for the problems and we
9:09
go to the other administration. Like
9:11
it's not quite that, also because
9:13
it's not that quick. Popes tend
9:15
to serve for decades, right? but
9:17
that there is sort of analogous
9:20
tensions within the Catholic Church that
9:22
there's a sort of conservative, trad
9:24
Catholic revival going on right now
9:26
in the West and that that's
9:28
kind of implicated in all the
9:30
cultural changes that are related to
9:32
Trumpism and all that stuff and
9:34
certainly kind of JD Vance and
9:36
sort of his worldview. And so,
9:38
you know, that's concerning, but I
9:40
also don't know if I'm just
9:42
like, I really don't know. So
9:45
am I just like predicting the
9:47
future in a way that... reduces
9:49
my eventual pain, probably, and I'm
9:51
probably speaking out of my ass
9:53
if I make any kind of
9:55
prediction, but it will be interesting
9:57
to see what happens there. Yeah.
9:59
Have you guys seen, they're a
10:01
little distasteful, but there's some mean...
10:03
lately about like the Pope meeting
10:05
with JD Vance and saying like
10:07
he was so upset by how
10:09
JD Vance represented Christianity that he
10:12
felt like he needed to go
10:14
apologize to God in person. I
10:16
have seen some jokes about it.
10:18
I'm trying not to give it
10:20
too much air. He made us
10:22
laugh at that life. Jeff Maurer.
10:24
Maurer. Maurer. I don't know how
10:26
to pronounce his last name. M-A-U-R-E-R.
10:28
He's like a former daily show
10:30
and certainly last week tonight, kind
10:32
of main writer who's now doing
10:34
this like the news with jokes
10:36
like solo sub stack thing. And
10:39
he did a piece, he did
10:41
a satirical piece written by JD
10:43
Vance about like, hey, it's just
10:45
a coincidence. It isn't that my...
10:47
depiction of Christianity was so awful
10:49
that the only thing Pope Francis
10:51
could do after seeing me was
10:53
to die. Like that can't be
10:55
really what happened. You know, these
10:57
are just coincidences. Anyway, it's really,
10:59
I'm very split on whether to
11:01
enjoy and laugh at that stuff
11:04
or just to be sad about
11:06
it and about the whole situation,
11:08
but yes, I have not escaped
11:10
them. Yeah. I will just note
11:12
that if anybody else is cringing
11:14
at these jokes, I'm... cringing and
11:16
representation of anybody else cringing at
11:18
these. Even though there was a
11:20
little giggle, you're cringing. Yeah. Exactly.
11:22
Thanks for letting us know because
11:24
your laughter, your automatic bodily responses
11:26
indicated that you thought it was
11:28
funny. So I'm glad that you
11:31
explained to us that you didn't
11:33
really. Yes. Yes. It's funny and
11:35
I know better. Yeah. Exactly. Exactly.
11:37
Okay. So Josh. Same question I
11:39
asked Joy. Like what was your
11:41
basic take about... Pope Francis. This
11:43
sort of ties into the survey
11:45
because there were two five iron
11:47
frenzy references on the survey, which
11:49
I love to see, Reese Roper
11:51
and the band itself. They have
11:53
a song called Superpowers where Reese
11:56
says, I don't want to meet
11:58
the Pope, I just want to.
12:00
to share with you how we
12:02
got this peace and hope. And
12:04
so the hope growing up in
12:06
my evangelical days was always this
12:08
like symbol of like, sort of
12:10
like commercial, like, I don't know,
12:12
power within, you know, christened, whatever.
12:14
And so this Pope seemed to
12:16
be the exception to that in
12:18
that, I mean, yeah, I don't
12:20
really know much about the Pope.
12:23
I was thinking about you, Joey,
12:25
and how you were saying last
12:27
episode that after your. deconstruction, there's
12:29
been kind of like, you've released
12:31
yourself from sort of analytic theology
12:33
discourse. And so I think when
12:35
it comes to the Pope, that
12:37
to me is in the same
12:40
little domain of like, I'm not
12:42
really thinking about the Pope. I
12:44
don't have much to say about
12:46
him. I feel like what the
12:48
headlines that I've read over the
12:50
last five, ten years felt like
12:52
he was doing something actually that
12:54
I cared about and agreed with.
12:57
So it's sad to see a
12:59
progressive leader figure in that sense
13:01
move on. But. I don't know
13:03
too much about him. So I'm
13:05
going to just share kind of
13:07
one thing and then I'll get
13:09
into more in those future episodes.
13:11
But for me, the kind of,
13:13
the main thing with Pope Francis
13:16
is the connection through the Jesuits.
13:18
I've talked about this, maybe not
13:20
in a while, but you know,
13:22
there was a time when I
13:24
got pretty close to becoming Catholic
13:26
and I was spending a decent
13:28
amount of time with a Jesuit
13:30
named Father Paul Federer, Paul Federer,
13:33
up here in Seattle. late 80s,
13:35
like way overdue for retirement. You
13:37
know, you could not keep the
13:39
dude down. And he had been
13:41
formed by the Jesuits in a
13:43
way very similar to how it
13:45
appears to me that Pope Francis
13:47
had been formed by the Jesuits.
13:50
Now Father Paul was just a
13:52
local Jesuit working at a Jesuit
13:54
high school and Pope Francis became
13:56
an archbishop and eventually Pope. So
13:58
they had different paths, but they
14:00
were within the same, what are
14:02
those called? Like the Benedictines, the
14:04
Dominicans, the Franciscans. What are those
14:06
called? Oh my gosh, well whatever.
14:09
Whatever those things are called. They're
14:11
like their own wings. They're their
14:13
own sort of schools in a
14:15
sense. And they actually run, many
14:17
of them, run schools and educational
14:19
programs. And they have kind of
14:21
their own internal structure. They're like
14:23
their own little government within the
14:26
larger umbrella of the Catholic Church,
14:28
but they have some autonomy. So
14:30
I sort of make some assumptions
14:32
about. Pope Francis, based on what
14:34
I experienced with Father Paul, because
14:36
there is a lot of overlap
14:38
and a lot of Francis' public
14:40
statements and his like main encyclicals,
14:43
the stuff that he would write
14:45
and publish. Orders. Orders, there are
14:47
orders, there we go, Jesuit order.
14:49
Would be quite similar and like
14:51
Father Paul would make similar arguments
14:53
and would sort of express agreement
14:55
and Paul was just... such a
14:57
wonderful, I believe he's still alive,
14:59
but he was in retirement now,
15:02
but he was just such a
15:04
lovely, lovely presence and just had
15:06
been formed morally into just a
15:08
beautiful, beautiful human being. And so
15:10
that gave me this kind of
15:12
personal angle on the Pope, where
15:14
I was like, well, he seems
15:16
kind of like Father Paul, and
15:19
Father Paul is the shit. I
15:21
mean, Father Paul is like, I
15:23
would trust him with the government.
15:25
You know, he's, he is like,
15:27
the kind of man I want
15:29
to be in many respects. And
15:31
they saw the world very similarly.
15:33
And so that's, that's kind of
15:36
the main thing. And so I've
15:38
always had a lot of positive
15:40
feeling toward Pope Francis. Joy, like
15:42
you, there, there were issues where
15:44
I would have hoped he would
15:46
kind of go further towards especially
15:48
inclusion around sexuality around sexuality and,
15:50
and all of that, but he...
15:52
He went farther than any other
15:55
Pope. I mean, so it's kind
15:57
of hard to, and it's a
15:59
global, you know, it's a global
16:01
institution and Americans and Europeans are
16:03
like broadly speaking to the left
16:05
theologically from the rest of the
16:07
world. And so we could expect,
16:09
you know, like logistically expect that
16:12
that it wouldn't quite. match exactly
16:14
what I would want it to
16:16
be, but kind of undeniably progress
16:18
to me, sort of, it's really
16:20
sad to have a major public
16:22
figure who was unambiguously on the
16:24
side of the poor and suffering
16:26
and marginalized the immigrant, you know,
16:29
he's the guy for our upcoming
16:31
crisis of climate refugees, you know,
16:33
Francis is the guy, not Vance
16:35
and Trump. and we'll see who
16:37
we get and I'm hoping that
16:39
it won't be somebody with that
16:41
kind of string of populist kind
16:43
of hatefulness. I don't think it
16:46
will be anybody really bad in
16:48
that respect. I mean this is
16:50
a weird prediction to make with
16:52
very little information. But even Pope
16:54
Benedict who preceded Francis, like, there's
16:56
people who have their critiques of
16:58
him, but like he also like
17:00
helped bring down the Soviet Union.
17:02
And you know, like he did
17:05
a lot of really beautiful great
17:07
things too. So the Pope has
17:09
been like a kind of a
17:11
moderating influence in global socio politics
17:13
and religious politics for most of
17:15
the last 50 years or whatever.
17:17
That's my kind of rough understanding.
17:19
Hopefully that will continue. I think
17:22
there's a lot of really interesting
17:24
stuff. to potentially cover around this,
17:26
but we will, again, we'll save
17:28
that for some later episodes. So,
17:30
should we move on a little
17:32
bit to the survey responses? Yes.
17:34
Okay. So what we did was,
17:36
you know, we had mentioned all
17:39
these particular. like episode series ideas
17:41
and we had everybody vote on
17:43
which of those they wanted but
17:45
we also asked a bunch of
17:47
other questions while we were at
17:49
it we were like hey let's
17:51
let's get some good information here
17:53
about our listenership there were questions
17:55
that we wanted to ask and
17:58
that this helped us to answer
18:00
and so I guess I just
18:02
want to start off with like
18:04
a quick shout out to a
18:06
couple of the homies who are
18:08
not going to get their way
18:10
Like out of the 166 responses,
18:12
I think there were like two
18:15
people who were like, don't talk
18:17
about therapy. Sorry guys. I am
18:19
gonna talk about therapy. Was there
18:21
anything else like that, Joy or
18:23
Josh, that you guys remember seeing,
18:25
which was like, I'm sorry, you
18:27
just might need to find another
18:29
podcast? There wasn't a lot of
18:32
this. Oh, I'm trying to think.
18:34
Yeah, that was. Definitely the one
18:36
that we actually got quite a
18:38
few people saying like I'm so
18:40
sorry, but I don't I'm not
18:42
interested in music We're definitely gonna
18:44
talk about the media stuff that
18:46
yeah, that's that's a big takeaway
18:48
Yeah, I think it's fair to
18:51
say Dan that we that statistically
18:53
based on this the comedian series
18:55
did not go over well. It's
18:57
not a fan favorite Not a
18:59
fan favorite. Yeah, so let's talk
19:01
about a couple kind of big
19:03
big takeaways and then we'll get
19:05
more into the weeds on the
19:08
second half for patrons only. So
19:10
one of the, yeah, one of
19:12
the kind of, maybe a slight
19:14
bummer of a takeaway is that
19:16
much as I and actually all
19:18
three of us really value sort
19:20
of discussing movies and TV shows
19:22
and music and sort of popular
19:25
culture and connecting that to religion
19:27
and spirituality. It is not a
19:29
fan favorite topic and I think
19:31
the data is pretty unambiguously clear
19:33
on that. I'll cite some numbers.
19:35
So one of the things we
19:37
asked was like what kind of
19:39
what sort of discussions do you
19:41
like hearing the most? So it's
19:44
like authors and writers comedians and
19:46
actors musicians theologians and philosophers scientists
19:48
and researchers and psychologists and therapists
19:50
and therapists and therapists and therapists
19:52
and therapists and therapists and therapists
19:54
and therapists and therapistsists and therapistsists
19:56
and therapists and therapists and therapists
19:58
and therapists and therapistsists and therapistsists
20:01
and therapistsists all 70% basically or
20:03
above. People were like, yes, I
20:05
like those episodes. Comedians and actors,
20:07
24% musicians. 32% and you've got
20:09
to think that John Mark McMillan
20:11
is responsible for half of those
20:13
because he's been so good on
20:15
the pod and his episodes do
20:18
you tend to do well? Yeah,
20:20
he was actually one of the
20:22
ones people mentioned really appreciating those
20:24
episodes. So there's going to be
20:26
standouts and outliers to all of
20:28
this. Of course, there are. But
20:30
like, those numbers don't lie. Those
20:32
are both less than half of
20:35
the next of the lowest of
20:37
the high items. And so a
20:39
takeaway for me there is like,
20:41
I'm going to have to convince
20:43
a different group of people that
20:45
this is a really interesting way
20:47
to think about our world. And
20:49
I plan to. I am going
20:51
to try. I'm going to try,
20:54
but maybe the relieving thing. for
20:56
you have permission listeners is, you
20:58
guys are not gonna primarily be
21:00
my guinea pigs. Maybe a little
21:02
bit here and there on the
21:04
patron feed, but basically this show
21:06
is going to not lean heavily
21:08
into the kind of media criticism
21:11
looking at media through a psychological
21:13
lens that I am still totally
21:15
enamored of and really find very
21:17
interesting. And I'm gonna do my
21:19
best, but. it's going to probably
21:21
be elsewhere. It'll be on our
21:23
casual Fridays. So casual. It's a
21:25
Thursday. So casual. It's Thursday. That's
21:28
better. That's better. That's better. You've
21:30
just punched up the bad original
21:32
idea and made it better and
21:34
made it more likely to happen.
21:36
Okay. And I want to say
21:38
this as a caveat to anybody
21:40
listening to this and thinking, I
21:42
didn't vote for those things. I
21:44
love it when you guys talk
21:47
about that like. I will still
21:49
be here representing the outliers because
21:51
there still is those 25% of
21:53
you that do really like that
21:55
and so you're still wanted here
21:57
and as long as I am
21:59
around they will just be a
22:01
little bit of that inside here
22:04
because that is just like core
22:06
to who I am. But also,
22:08
if you disagree with these results,
22:10
vehemently, please do let us know,
22:12
you know, if we have missed
22:14
a swath of people. Yeah, we're
22:16
going off the, we can only
22:18
go off the data we have,
22:21
but if you, you know, if
22:23
you have disagreements with any of
22:25
these conclusions, you know, let us
22:27
know, persuade us otherwise, but we've,
22:29
we've, we've got to work with
22:31
the data we have. And really.
22:33
I think I speak for all
22:35
of us when I say it's
22:37
because we like our listeners, your
22:40
listeners. I feel bought in, but
22:42
yeah, we like the listeners and
22:44
we want to keep creating things
22:46
that, you know, add to your
22:48
life. And so this was really
22:50
valuable information to receive and yeah,
22:52
it's so that we can keep
22:54
creating stuff that as to your
22:57
life and makes it better. Yeah,
22:59
it's safe to say that this
23:01
of the 166 responders, this is
23:03
like a core part of the
23:05
audience, like to listen to it
23:07
carefully enough to give, you know,
23:09
answers on the survey. It's funny
23:11
thinking about that because I was
23:14
like, I kind of just want
23:16
to like make jokes and like
23:18
tease a lot of these responses,
23:20
but I think that's not the
23:22
best practice considering that this is
23:24
like, you know, They did us
23:26
a service by telling us the
23:28
answers. Yeah, no, they totally did.
23:30
Another thing I thought would be
23:33
maybe one more thing before we
23:35
switch over to the patron feed,
23:37
Joy, you spent some time just
23:39
kind of soaking in all the
23:41
responses and you kind of synthesize
23:43
that in your own mind and
23:45
kind of wrote to me like
23:47
a sort of an average listener
23:50
composite. And I like these. I
23:52
like these kind of composites. They
23:54
of course don't capture everybody. I
23:56
know that you are the voice
23:58
of the outlier joy and so
24:00
I appreciate that. But in Sherwood,
24:02
we used to joke that the
24:04
median Sherwood voter was a male
24:07
Mormon in a polo shirt from
24:09
Utah or Idaho. And that really
24:11
kind of was like the. most
24:13
Sherwood fan, Sherwood fan that there
24:15
was, and it can be useful,
24:17
like to know that about yourself.
24:19
Like, it was useful to know
24:21
that about our band, that we
24:24
were not pulling the rebellious, you
24:26
know, goth kids, like we were
24:28
pulling the suburban 20-somethings and teenagers
24:30
who would go on to have
24:32
comfortable middle class careers. Like, that's
24:34
who we, that's who liked our
24:36
band. I'm okay with it. And
24:38
so I kind of like thinking
24:40
about who are the listeners? Like
24:43
who are the people who tend
24:45
to find this content helpful? So
24:47
Joy, can you share some bullet
24:49
points of that composite picture? Again,
24:51
it's not going to be true
24:53
for everyone. So these are generalities
24:55
and again, as the sole woman
24:57
in this conversation, I'm already an
25:00
outlier because 75% of your audience.
25:02
It's 70 as more came in.
25:04
Okay. 70% identified as male. Sorry
25:06
64% 64% it's it the early
25:08
early early respondents were more predominantly
25:10
male 64% the ballots came in
25:12
percentage we counted after we counted
25:14
all of the mail in ballots
25:17
it's 64% which by the way
25:19
is is an outlier in the
25:21
sort of. faith deconstruction world. I
25:23
think there are a lot of
25:25
male podcast hosts and like writers
25:27
and stuff, that makes sense, especially
25:29
coming out of an environment where
25:31
only men generally could be ordained
25:33
and get that kind of education.
25:36
But listener-wise, like Homberg Christianity, new
25:38
evangelicals, like my understanding of these
25:40
other podcasts, Rob Bell's back in
25:42
the day is like. It's more
25:44
like 60, 40 women, 70, 30
25:46
women. And I used to be
25:48
about 50, 50, and that was
25:50
rare, and I've gone more, now
25:53
65, 35, with a one or
25:55
two percent non-binary mixed in there.
25:57
And that's interesting. And I don't
25:59
judge that one way or the
26:01
other, but I'm curious about it.
26:03
Yeah. Okay, so majority is, I'm
26:05
not going to get into percentages
26:07
too hard, but majority identify as
26:10
male, Christian. And by the way,
26:12
we worded Christian as like Christian
26:14
or some version of Jesus follower.
26:16
Yeah, something like that. Yeah. Yes.
26:18
So most people identify to some
26:20
form of Christian or Jesus follower
26:22
adhering to Christian traditions, I think.
26:24
In the age ranges of kind
26:26
of millennials and Gen Z. Primary
26:29
interests were theology and philosophy and
26:31
not into pop culture at all.
26:33
Not really, not the average, no.
26:35
Which I don't know, in our
26:37
last conversation where we talked about
26:39
the survey after the patron break,
26:41
I was talking about just in
26:43
my own experience how like part
26:46
of me like, you know, getting
26:48
well after being sick on. religion
26:50
for a while has been a
26:52
sort of an intentional movement away
26:54
from some of a more academic
26:56
intellectual. more embodied, more kind of
26:58
wide lens. Like health has meant
27:00
like actually like getting to participate
27:03
in pop culture. So part of
27:05
me was like a little bit
27:07
sad that I was like, I'm
27:09
pretty much the opposite of what
27:11
all of these majority things like
27:13
I'm not a male, I don't
27:15
identify as Christian, I'm still barely
27:17
a millennial. Theology is in an
27:19
area of super interest. So you
27:22
know. I will still be here
27:24
though because I think that even
27:26
as we see majorities, Dan, you're
27:28
always going to value having like,
27:30
you know, devil's advocates around, perhaps
27:32
literally, and metaphorically, but no, just,
27:34
yeah, just good conversation. You need
27:36
a diversity of people, so happy
27:39
to keep representing the outliers. Obviously,
27:41
like, my kind of nerdiness and
27:43
overactive sort of abstract ideas mind
27:45
that I am so drawn. to
27:47
like naturally, there's an obvious connection
27:49
there between the way that I
27:51
am gonna choose to talk about
27:53
things, the way I think about
27:56
things and the people I choose
27:58
to talk about them with, right?
28:00
That's kind of the main. That's
28:02
the main determining factor of what
28:04
ends up getting covered on the
28:06
show. And so that part's not
28:08
surprising. If you want some maybe
28:10
more surprising things or just to
28:12
hear more, you can join the
28:15
patron. We're going to flip over
28:17
to the rest of this conversation
28:19
for patrons only. Patron.com/Dan Coke. If
28:21
you do the yearly subscription, it's
28:23
just like five bucks and change
28:25
a month. It's seven bucks a
28:27
month a month. And you get
28:29
at least two full length exclusive
28:32
episodes. But as we spoke, as
28:34
we spoke. the amount of content
28:36
not the price not the price
28:38
the amount of content is going
28:40
to go up the price is
28:42
going to stay the same and
28:44
I'm just going to try and
28:46
really make that patronage like even
28:49
more valuable for people as I
28:51
get a little bit more time
28:53
in my schedule to do so
28:55
that's been my goal all along
28:57
Again, thanks everybody for the support
28:59
up till now, so we will
29:01
see the rest of you on
29:03
the other side. Actually, we'll just
29:06
have Josh insert a clip of
29:08
Five Iron Frenzy to, you know,
29:10
transition us into the patron's hand.
29:12
Thanks, Josh. Paypal
29:37
lets you pay all your pals, like your
29:39
graduation gifters. Who's paying for the mattress hopper?
29:41
You mean the beanbag chair? Aren't we getting
29:43
a mini bridge? Can we create a pool
29:45
on Paypal? It lets us collect the money
29:47
before we buy. Oh, yes, that's smart. Glad
29:49
we can agree on something. Easily, pool, split,
29:51
and send money with Paypal. Get started in
29:53
the Paypal app. A PayPal account
29:55
is required to send
29:57
and receive money. money.
29:59
A A account is required
30:01
to create a pool.
30:03
create a pool.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More