The Living Process Interview:  A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

The Living Process Interview: A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

Released Tuesday, 14th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Living Process Interview:  A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

The Living Process Interview: A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

The Living Process Interview:  A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

The Living Process Interview: A Conversation with Dr. Greg Madison

Tuesday, 14th January 2025
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The following talk is

0:02

offered freely to ensure

0:05

no one is denied

0:07

access to these

0:09

practices and to these

0:11

teachings. If you feel

0:13

inspired to make a

0:15

donation to support this

0:17

offering you can go

0:19

to my website at

0:21

www. Jonathan Faust.com. And

0:23

while you're there, you

0:25

can also sign up

0:27

for a monthly newsletter

0:30

designed to support you in

0:32

your practice. It'd be a pleasure to have

0:34

you as part of our community. Thank you

0:36

and enjoy. If

0:50

you listen to any of my

0:52

talks or meditations or do any

0:54

retreats with me, you know that

0:57

I'm a pretty body-based semantic inquiry

0:59

kind of guy. And a lot of

1:01

my understanding around this is informed

1:03

by the work of Dr. Eugene

1:06

Genlin and the whole realm and

1:08

discipline of what's called focusing.

1:10

And I'd like to share with you

1:12

today and interview I had with Dr.

1:14

Greg Madison. Greg is in

1:16

my estimation an awesome person. An

1:19

awesome person. He's an

1:21

existential and focusing-oriented

1:23

psychologist. He's a passionate focusing

1:25

teacher. He's dedicated to

1:27

supporting people looking to deepen self-awareness

1:30

and clarity in their life.

1:32

And he has a podcast called

1:34

The Living Process, wherein he interviews

1:37

lots of luminaries and leaders in

1:39

this area of focusing and semantic

1:41

exploration. I really feel honored to

1:44

be part of the conversation. He's

1:46

a deep thinker. He's an empathic listener.

1:48

I think you'll enjoy all of

1:50

his offerings, so I'm going to

1:52

include information about his podcast and

1:55

his work in the show notes. And

1:57

as this is a pretty long interview

1:59

about an... we will forego the

2:01

opening meditation we usually have

2:04

and go right into the

2:06

conversation. And Greg starts this off

2:08

with kind of an overview in a

2:10

summary, so I will leave all of

2:12

that to him. So I hope you find

2:15

the following helpful and

2:17

many blessings. Hello, my name

2:19

is Greg Madison and welcome

2:21

to this episode of The

2:23

Living Process. It's Christmas Eve

2:26

and my special guest this

2:28

time is Jonathan Faust. Jonathan

2:31

is very well known within

2:33

Buddhist communities and also in

2:35

yoga. He is trained in

2:37

a whole list of

2:40

different somatic practices including

2:42

focusing. We talk quite a

2:44

bit about how Jonathan combines

2:47

his understanding as well

2:49

as practice focusing with

2:51

some of these other

2:54

traditions. He describes his

2:56

own personal journey. which is

2:58

very interesting and he's dedicated

3:01

his life to these various

3:03

practices and it really shows

3:05

in the way that he

3:07

interacts and the responses he

3:10

gives to some of my

3:12

questions. We talk a little

3:14

bit about what the body is

3:16

and about energy flow through

3:18

the body. We also end by

3:20

talking a little bit about how

3:22

to bring some of these

3:25

practices or... an attitude of

3:27

compassion to the sort of

3:29

uncertainties in the world today

3:31

and how not to just

3:33

jump into the divisions that we

3:36

see in a lot of

3:38

societies. I really enjoyed

3:40

the conversation. He's a delightful

3:42

man to converse with and

3:45

yeah I hope you really

3:47

enjoy this episode with Jonathan

3:49

Faust. Welcome

4:04

back to the living process

4:07

and my guest this time

4:09

is Jonathan Faust. Welcome

4:11

Jonathan. Thank you. It's a

4:13

it's a privilege and an

4:16

honor to be here with you.

4:18

Yeah well it's a real pleasure

4:20

to have you as a guest.

4:23

We worked quite hard to make

4:25

this happen. Yes it took it

4:27

took some some resilience to make

4:29

this happen. It did. The

4:32

first thing I'd like to ask

4:34

people, and I'd like to ask you,

4:36

is particularly I know

4:38

that you have a much broader kind

4:40

of sense of different traditions

4:42

than just focusing. But if

4:45

I start with the focusing

4:47

question, I'm curious how you

4:49

found focusing or got introduced

4:52

to it or your kind

4:54

of journey with the focusing

4:56

process. Yeah, yeah. Well, that

4:58

question automatically makes me feel

5:01

old. I look back, I feel

5:03

like that old prospector, you know,

5:05

let's see, I was back in

5:07

83. So way back when I had

5:09

been in the Peace Corps,

5:12

I was teaching in a

5:14

university, teaching phonetics and linguistics,

5:17

and just to shake up

5:19

my life, I attempted to

5:21

be the first American to

5:23

cross the Sahara Desert on

5:26

my bicycle from the south,

5:28

which didn't happen. And I

5:30

ended up going through all

5:32

kinds of crazy adventures, and

5:34

I actually ended up stumbling

5:37

into an ashram, literally stumbling

5:39

into an ashram when I

5:41

was, I think, 25. And

5:43

there was this book, Jenlin's

5:46

book, Unfocuseding. And I picked

5:48

it up, and I just read a

5:51

little bit of it, and I

5:53

did a little reflection, and I

5:55

had this really powerful shift. like

5:57

a really dramatic shift.

5:59

And it was like, wow,

6:01

there's something really, really juicy here.

6:04

And then I got sucked

6:06

into ashram life, and so, which

6:08

was a very, very deep, deep

6:11

immersion into yoga, you know, into

6:13

the whole field of energy

6:15

and exploring all of that, you

6:17

know, kind of the, maybe we can

6:19

talk more about, about that and

6:22

how to sort of, how that's

6:24

come into my own practice with

6:26

focusing. So I got to put

6:28

the book down, got very immersed

6:30

into that world, and we did

6:32

a, it was a very sense-based

6:35

couple decades. You know, I'd like

6:37

to joke, I came for lunch

6:39

and I stayed for 23 years

6:41

in the ashra. And then when

6:43

my time was done and we

6:45

went through all kinds of changes

6:47

as a community, we had to

6:50

re-visualize ourselves after we

6:52

had a kind of a meltdown

6:54

with our our guru, our teacher

6:56

and... for a couple years I

6:59

was president and then I was

7:01

done. And then I moved down

7:03

to Washington DC, fell in love

7:05

with my wife and I remembered,

7:08

oh focusing, I want to get

7:10

back to that. So I did

7:12

my training with Robert Lee and

7:15

domain focusing, which is fantastic. And

7:17

at the time I was very

7:19

deeply immersed in Buddhist psychology and

7:21

sort of teaching through that lens

7:24

and just a synergy. of my

7:26

training, the whole felt sense of

7:28

my own learning and offering it

7:31

out into the world has

7:33

just been fantastic. So from

7:35

there, I've done a year-long

7:38

training, I've done 10 times

7:40

where we do a whole

7:42

year of deep immersion into

7:45

into the practice in the

7:47

context of meditation and Buddha

7:49

psychology. So that was a

7:52

long response to a very,

7:54

very simple question. Immediately, I'm

7:56

very curious about sort

8:00

of the different avenues, if I

8:02

could call them that, the Buddhist,

8:05

the yoga, and then the focusing

8:07

that it sounds like it came

8:09

in briefly, it receded, and then

8:11

it came back. And I'm curious how

8:14

those three go together if they

8:16

do, or do they remain separate

8:18

for you? It's all one whole, one

8:20

whole, mish-mash, but in essence,

8:22

and what was so interesting

8:25

was having that sort of

8:27

like epiphany experience of reading.

8:29

reading Genle's book and being

8:31

so immersed into the whole

8:33

realm of yoga, my guru's

8:35

guru said that the whole world

8:37

is made up of two elements.

8:40

In Sanskrit, it's referred

8:42

to as chita and prana,

8:44

awareness and energy. And in those

8:46

two realms of energy and awareness,

8:49

you have the whole span of

8:51

awareness from from thoughts to beliefs

8:53

to states to awareness itself. and

8:55

the realm of energy we have

8:57

we've got life force we have

8:59

the feeling tone of the life

9:02

force we have kind of the

9:04

expression of life force and our

9:06

entire life is about balancing chit

9:08

that prana so when you're two

9:10

in your head you come home you've been

9:12

wound up after a long day what do

9:14

you want to do you gonna drink a

9:16

beer you're gonna put in some

9:19

music you know dance around the

9:21

room work out take your dog

9:23

for a walk do something to

9:25

get the energy flowing And then

9:27

the times when there's too much

9:29

energy were kind of over-prongified, if

9:31

you will, you know, or strong

9:34

emotion or hypervigilance, we kind of,

9:36

we want to, we want to

9:38

get a handle on what's going.

9:40

So we're going to kind of

9:42

lean into more of the conceptual.

9:44

So we're always trying to balance

9:46

these two things out. And yoga

9:49

is about, really about exploring

9:51

this, the awakening of this energy.

9:54

And part of what the suggestion is

9:56

that that energy or Prana or life

9:58

force or cheap or or holy

10:00

spirit, is it possible that

10:02

it is intelligent and evolutionary?

10:05

And if we can deeply

10:07

listen to it, is it

10:09

possible that it is bringing

10:11

us inexorably toward a more

10:13

awakened quality of awareness? So

10:15

I'm immediately curious whether that

10:17

is perhaps different language and

10:20

maybe even a different understanding,

10:22

but also applies to what

10:24

we do in focusing when

10:26

we bring our awareness to

10:28

a felt sense. Is that

10:30

the same as Prana and

10:32

Chita? To my mind, absolutely.

10:35

Absolutely. Because what happens, let's

10:37

say, just to bring it

10:39

back to yoga. Yeah. Let's

10:41

say you're in a yoga

10:43

posture, you know, you're in

10:45

like the triangle pose, you

10:47

know, trichinacena, and you're suffering,

10:49

you know. You're hanging on

10:52

for dear life. You're aware

10:54

of what's not moving. You're

10:56

aware of what's congested, what's

10:58

stagnant, what's stuck. And you

11:00

breathe into it. And you

11:02

relax into it. You feel

11:04

into it. You get more

11:07

familiar with it. And then

11:09

what happens is that... stagnant,

11:11

congested stuck energy will begin

11:13

to move. It'll begin to

11:15

shift. And then you feel

11:17

the rush, the endorphan rush

11:19

of that release of tension.

11:22

And then what happens is,

11:24

again, if energy is intelligent

11:26

and evolutionary, it'll go to

11:28

the next place where it's

11:30

blocked, because it's designed to

11:32

move into a sense of

11:34

free flow, if you will.

11:36

So it's the same thing.

11:39

In my simplified view. Yeah,

11:41

I mean that's really interesting

11:43

to me. As I listen

11:45

to you, I was thinking

11:47

it sounds very similar, different

11:49

kind of conceptualization of what's

11:51

happening perhaps, but... Very similar,

11:54

and then I thought, are

11:56

we talking about the same

11:58

body? Because when you're talking

12:00

about the yoga body, it

12:02

sounds like in some way,

12:04

I think you're talking about

12:06

more than this, but in

12:09

some way you're talking about

12:11

the physiological body and tension,

12:13

muscle tension, but that signifies

12:15

more than just muscle tension,

12:17

is that right? Yoga describes

12:19

it as the prona body.

12:21

It's the energy body. Okay.

12:23

Yeah, so it's a subtle

12:26

body. Okay, so that's similar

12:28

to focusing then, the films.

12:30

Yeah. Absolutely, absolutely. Yeah. And

12:32

how I view it is,

12:34

we have this level of

12:36

a pure prana of life

12:38

force, which is kind of

12:41

undifferentiated. You know, it's neither

12:43

good nor bad. And then,

12:45

and then here, it kind

12:47

of brings them sort of

12:49

like the Buddhist perspective is.

12:51

That experience of energy is

12:53

immediately experienced in one of

12:56

three categories of pleasant, unpleasant,

12:58

or neutral. And the Buddhist

13:00

angle is referred to as

13:02

beta-na. It's the feeling tone.

13:04

And then without being aware,

13:06

usually, we react to the

13:08

feeling tone. And then that

13:10

will kick off. It kicks

13:13

off the associations, memories, thoughts,

13:15

all the reactive patterns, usually

13:17

wanting to move away from

13:19

unpleasant, increase pleasure, and get

13:21

bored with the neutral. Yeah.

13:23

So this is jumping way

13:25

ahead, but I have to

13:28

ask it now. Because that

13:30

sounds like a very full

13:32

understanding and practice. And I'm

13:34

wondering what would have made

13:36

you interested in kind of

13:38

coming back to focusing? A

13:40

couple things. This goes back

13:43

to my own history, kind

13:45

of back to the back

13:47

of the whole. you know,

13:49

living in spiritual community and

13:51

this whole kind of immersed

13:53

in the energetic world. I

13:55

became fascinated with, what does

13:57

it mean to heal? You

14:00

know, so I got trained

14:02

in lots of hands-on modalities.

14:04

You know, we're working with

14:06

energy, you know, trigger work,

14:08

structural acupressure, cranial sacral, and

14:10

it's just fascinated by how,

14:12

like, how subtly can we

14:15

detect what's not flowing, bring

14:17

attention to it. And then

14:19

sort of track that energetic

14:21

release and, you know, where

14:23

it goes next. It's endlessly

14:25

fascinating to me. So years

14:27

later, when I kind of

14:30

left the whole community and

14:32

I moved down to the

14:34

DC area, I thought, like,

14:36

how do I work with

14:38

people? And part of it

14:40

is, you know, the hands-on

14:42

work is really fun. It's

14:44

also highly licensed and all

14:47

that kind of stuff. I

14:49

thought, well, I work a

14:51

lot with people through mindfulness

14:53

and through meditation. Well, here's

14:55

focusing, which is perhaps even

14:57

the most subtle form of

14:59

this kind of work. As

15:02

you contrast it to sort

15:04

of like the gross manipulation

15:06

of tissue, as opposed to

15:08

how do we bring attention

15:10

to what's stagnant, what's stuck,

15:12

how do we work that?

15:14

And of course, that opens

15:17

up this endlessly fascinating world

15:19

of the power of inquiry

15:21

around. working with what's not

15:23

fully alive. Yeah, yeah, or

15:25

what's somehow asking for the

15:27

next step in life or

15:29

something. Exactly, exactly. Yeah, it's

15:31

like, where's the, you know,

15:34

where's the stress? Where's the

15:36

suffering? Or if we think

15:38

of the two wings of

15:40

mindfulness, you know, one wing

15:42

is a wing of wisdom,

15:44

you know, what is, what

15:46

is actually presenting right now?

15:49

What, what, what, what is

15:51

this, what is Can I

15:53

name it? And then, loving

15:55

awareness, how does this want?

15:57

to be with that? Which

15:59

are the two elemental questions

16:01

in focusing? Yeah, that's one

16:04

of the things I was

16:06

wondering when you were describing

16:08

the yoga practice, whether there

16:10

is that kind of gentle,

16:12

kind, loving sort of awareness

16:14

to the stuck places. Is

16:16

that a part of the

16:18

practice? We know what's so

16:21

interesting is in the span

16:23

of yoga, you've got in

16:25

any tradition. And this includes

16:27

both yoga and in meditation.

16:29

When I first heard this,

16:31

an author by the name

16:33

of Jason Siff, he wrote

16:36

a book called Unlearning meditation.

16:38

When I first heard this,

16:40

I thought, that's crazy. And

16:42

I thought, I thought, no,

16:44

it's true. He said, whatever

16:46

tradition you get trained in,

16:48

you can find another tradition

16:51

that will give you exactly

16:53

the opposite instructions. And

16:55

that's so, because in yoga,

16:57

you've got the intensely willful

16:59

practice, you know, where you're,

17:01

you know, just pushed through

17:04

the energy blocks. And then

17:06

you have traditions that are

17:08

all around surrender, you know,

17:10

and listening and softening and

17:12

flow. And my training was

17:14

more in kind of in

17:16

the flow realm of Krapalo

17:18

yoga. But the same thing

17:20

with meditation, you can do

17:22

like the sitings of strong

17:24

determination where you're developing, you

17:26

know, you're developing that intense

17:28

focus. And then there are

17:30

the traditions of just trust

17:32

the unfolding of what's there.

17:34

It reminds me of psychotherapy

17:36

because it certainly has all

17:38

of that spectrum as well.

17:40

But then it makes me

17:42

think of focusing. In the

17:44

focusing world, I wonder if

17:46

in some ways we also

17:48

have that spectrum. kind of

17:50

from boot camp focusing to,

17:52

you know, very gentle focusing.

17:54

Absolutely, but I think, and

17:56

again, this is just my,

17:59

my perspective is what we're

18:01

really helping. to do is

18:03

to find their own authority.

18:05

You know, one of the

18:07

most powerful inquiries I can

18:09

offer someone in focusing when

18:11

we're in touch with the

18:13

felt sense. We have a

18:15

sense of what it is.

18:17

We can sense the tenfold

18:19

of it. We can sense

18:21

how old it is. Is

18:23

there a sense of how

18:25

this wants you to be

18:27

with it right now? Yeah.

18:29

And I love that question

18:31

because... When you pose that

18:33

question and you wait, the

18:35

most amazing things arise out

18:37

of that, which is really

18:39

coming from the individual's own

18:41

place of authority. Yeah, that

18:43

makes sense. Yeah, no, that

18:45

makes perfect sense to me.

18:47

Yeah, that in the focusing

18:49

practice, there is... There

18:53

is a tradition, but it's a

18:55

tradition that maybe has a slightly

18:57

different role than some other traditions

19:00

in that it's not a tradition

19:02

that can offer any sort of

19:04

external authority about how to practice.

19:07

It's only a tradition that points

19:09

you to your own authority to

19:11

discover what practice is right for

19:14

you. Exactly. It points to what

19:16

I think of as the pathless

19:19

path. Yeah. And in the path

19:21

of path, we really only have

19:23

two questions. What's happening right now?

19:26

How does it want me to

19:28

be with it? Like what's the

19:30

most important thing as I'm with

19:33

this right now? I'm not sure

19:35

there's anything else in any given

19:37

moment if we really segment out

19:40

our experience. Yeah, yeah, I mean

19:42

that definitely resonates for me. And

19:44

I think probably in the focusing

19:47

world there's... that tendency towards a

19:49

kind of resistance to authority and

19:52

perhaps a slight kind of anarchy

19:54

that is not in any way

19:56

chaotic. Yeah, yeah. And that's what

19:59

I love about, of course, about

20:01

Genlin and what I love about

20:03

the old-timers is, you know, I

20:06

think I've mentioned this to you

20:08

in an email. It's like, there's

20:10

a sense of anarchy that I

20:13

love because it really is around

20:15

individual awakening. There's no there's no

20:17

cookie cutter approach here at all.

20:20

Yeah, exactly. So I'm wondering from

20:22

your perspective, because you've had so

20:25

much experience in these other traditions,

20:27

what in your view could they

20:29

potentially offer to someone that has

20:32

a focusing practice? Well, I think

20:34

when we... When we kind of

20:36

look at the, let's just say

20:39

we look to the kind of

20:41

the Buddhist lens, yeah, and we

20:43

look through these, the two wings

20:46

of wisdom and compassion, you know,

20:48

wisdom being, recognizing what's true, not

20:50

your preference, not your embellishment, but

20:53

what's true, and then really exploring

20:55

how to hold it, you know,

20:58

how does this want me to

21:00

be with it? The one model,

21:02

which you may be familiar with,

21:05

is the model, it's called a

21:07

rain model, R-A-A-I-N-N, R-I-I-N, R-I-I-I-N, Which

21:09

is a really wonderful synergy with

21:12

focusing. This was created by Michelle

21:14

McDonald originally and my wife Tara

21:16

Brock kind of reworked it. She

21:19

has a book out on this.

21:21

And the rain model is very

21:23

powerful. The R is to recognize

21:26

or realize what's presenting. The A

21:28

is to ask yourself, can I

21:30

allow it? Can I accept it?

21:33

The eyes to investigate. And then

21:35

there's sort of two versions of

21:38

rain. The N initially was to,

21:40

was around. not identifying and then

21:42

Tara kind of reworked it and

21:45

actually nurture which is like calling

21:47

on, calling on loving presence and

21:49

kind of ties also into domain

21:52

focusing which I which I studied

21:54

with with Robert Lee. But I

21:56

find like the questions, you know,

21:59

the inquiries that arise, you know,

22:01

to recognize like what is this,

22:03

you know, like that just that

22:06

sense of like what is this,

22:08

like what is this, like what

22:11

is this, like, like what is

22:13

this, like, like what is this,

22:15

like, like what is this, like

22:18

what is this, like, like, like,

22:20

And then, can you be with

22:22

it? And here, always, I just

22:25

encourage people, like, that's a deeply

22:27

somatic inquiry. Can't be with it.

22:29

Is it okay? Listen for the

22:32

somatic response, because it may not

22:34

be the right, the right, there

22:36

might, may not be the right

22:39

time. You know, there are these

22:41

qualities in, sort of like through

22:44

the Buddhist lens of the factors

22:46

of awakening. You know, there's certain

22:48

factors of awakening that are kind

22:51

of required to be present. You

22:53

have to have access to non-judging

22:55

awareness. You know, you have to

22:58

have a quality of concentration to

23:00

actually stay present. You have to

23:02

have a quality of curiosity of

23:05

curiosity to kind of want to

23:07

know more. You have to have

23:09

a quality of what's called rapture,

23:12

which is like the joy of

23:14

discovery. You have to have a

23:16

quality of steadiness. You have to

23:19

got to have fire power. You

23:21

need energy. You need energy. And

23:24

so that question of can I

23:26

be with it? And it's a

23:28

very very simple question, but to

23:31

really recognize that you may not

23:33

have the fire power. You just

23:35

may not have physical energy to

23:38

be with it. You may not

23:40

have access to mindfulness. So if

23:42

you get that somatic response, I

23:45

can't be with it right now.

23:47

It's too much. It's that whole

23:49

idea of letting it know you

23:52

see it. Letting it know your

23:54

intention is to be with it.

23:57

That's another time when the conditions

23:59

are different. your intention is to

24:01

be present with it. And it's

24:04

such a powerful step that I

24:06

think it's overlooked by a lot

24:08

of people. We have this sense

24:11

of, I just need to muscle

24:13

through this. And I'm not sure

24:15

that's so skillful. Yeah, no, I

24:18

totally agree. Can I be with

24:20

this in such a way that

24:22

I don't violate it at all?

24:25

Yeah. Yeah. And I love the,

24:27

you know, the analogy of, you

24:30

know, the felt senses, the wild

24:32

animal at the edge of the

24:34

edge of the edge of the

24:37

edge of the woods, the woods,

24:39

the woods, you know. You can't

24:41

seduce it in, you can't chase

24:44

it, but you can let it

24:46

know you see it. And that's

24:48

such a delicate, delicate relationship. So

24:51

that's the A. And then the

24:53

I, of course, is to investigate.

24:55

And I think we know we

24:58

have a tendency, particularly in the

25:00

West, to like have it be

25:02

an intellectual investigation. When the investigation

25:05

here is deeply, deeply semantic. And

25:07

if there is an investigation around

25:10

thoughts and beliefs, it's so important

25:12

to connect the dots back to

25:14

the felt sense, of course. And

25:17

then, and then again, you know,

25:19

through the focusing model, you know,

25:21

when you have that, when you

25:24

really have that sense of what

25:26

this is and the tendrils and

25:28

all of that, what happens when

25:31

I bring loving presence to this?

25:33

You know, and all the all

25:35

the variations of the inquiries around

25:38

that. you know, how does this

25:40

want me to be with it

25:43

right now? If I were simply

25:45

to hold this in loving presence,

25:47

how does it move or shift

25:50

or change? So that rain model

25:52

I find to be incredibly, it's

25:54

an incredible handle for people to

25:57

deeply move into more semantic inquiry.

25:59

Yeah, very, very useful. I agree

26:01

with everything you've said and a

26:04

question that arises for me. which

26:06

is a question to myself as

26:08

much as to you or anyone

26:11

else, is just why do you

26:13

think it is that the body

26:16

needs these particular qualities? Why is

26:18

it not possible to coax or

26:20

coerce or push the body or

26:23

the felt sense forward? Why is

26:25

it these particular kind of non-invasive

26:27

yet carrying curiosity welcoming? Why are

26:30

those qualities? Why is that what

26:32

life response to? You know, I,

26:34

with one of the best lines

26:37

I've ever heard, I sat a

26:39

couple retreats with the teacher by

26:41

the name of Soakni Rampache, who

26:44

taught very much from the kind

26:46

of the Zochen, the non-dual tradition,

26:49

and he talked about compassion. And

26:51

he said, compassion is the lubrication

26:53

that allows us to let go

26:56

what we know we need to

26:58

let go of. And I love

27:00

that. I love that. There's another

27:03

quote I love from a teacher

27:05

of Emmanuel who said, that there's

27:07

not a heart in this world

27:10

that would not open instantly if

27:12

it did not feel safe enough.

27:14

And I feel like there's something

27:17

to be said for, you know,

27:19

the powering through, the muscling through,

27:21

the, you know, pushing, you know,

27:24

pushing edges and building resilience. And

27:26

there's a lot to be said

27:29

for exploring that sense of loving

27:31

presence, you know, of... of that

27:33

like deep and pathic listening, you

27:36

know, for so many people. And

27:38

again, it's a cliche, but most

27:40

cliches are true. There is an

27:43

element of spiritual reparenting here, you

27:45

know. Does that make sense? It

27:47

makes sense, but it's still, maybe

27:50

it's not a question. Maybe I'm

27:52

the only one that makes this

27:54

into a question, but I still

27:57

wonder. Why is compassion such a

27:59

powerful attitude or approach? environment for

28:02

the body or for the being

28:04

or for the person or for

28:06

life on the one hand and

28:09

then related to that

28:11

it's always surprised me

28:13

how even when someone

28:15

myself or anyone else

28:17

is really quite suffering

28:20

if with a focusing guide

28:22

or anyone else If you

28:25

can invite the person to

28:27

kind of take a step

28:30

back into that more compassionate

28:32

approach to themselves and give

28:35

the feeling some space and

28:37

just be open to it,

28:39

welcome it, all of that kind

28:41

of language, how often

28:44

it actually readily is

28:46

available? How is it that

28:48

it's almost as though? We

28:51

kind of make ourselves

28:54

small and self-preservation

28:56

that is always

28:58

there to open up to. I

29:00

mean, how do you understand

29:02

that? It's a really powerful

29:05

question, but I think

29:07

my question for you

29:09

is, what works for you? When

29:12

you find yourself small,

29:14

caught in

29:16

self-preservation, etc.

29:18

That's always what works

29:20

for me is immediately to

29:22

give myself space, but not

29:25

a kind of an objective

29:27

cold sort of clinical space,

29:29

but a space that is

29:32

welcoming, that has at least

29:34

some caring, that suddenly I'm

29:36

curious about myself as

29:39

a being again, that that

29:41

kind of space that

29:43

is totally non-critical, non-judgmental

29:47

that. Always my body expands

29:49

in response to that. Yeah,

29:51

so I'm right there with you.

29:54

And I think from the

29:56

lens of Buddhist psychology or

29:58

Buddhist philosophy that the That access

30:00

to heart space, that access

30:03

to compassion is a training. Yeah,

30:05

it's referred to as meta,

30:07

you know, cultivating loving kindness.

30:10

It's like this little sprout

30:12

that requires a greenhouse for

30:15

protection. You know, because we

30:17

are so trained out of it,

30:19

you know, from such an early

30:22

age, you know, that negativity bias

30:24

is so, so intense. So in

30:26

classic method training. Well, there are

30:29

different variations of it, but you

30:31

reflect on your benefactors, you know,

30:33

you just reflect on the people

30:36

who you know are on your

30:38

side, you know, and you just

30:40

stream attention toward that. And

30:42

again, you can do it intellectually,

30:45

but the real work is doing

30:47

it sematically, you know, so you

30:49

actually access, what is it like

30:51

to, when you think about people

30:53

who you know like you, who

30:55

the people who laugh at your

30:58

jokes, you know, like to really

31:00

reflect into that. And then to

31:02

explore what's easy. And that's where

31:04

you start with your pets, you

31:06

know, with plants, you know, and

31:08

then you start to, you just

31:10

stream attention. Again, it's moving

31:13

from the thought into the

31:15

end of the felt sense. when you

31:17

increase your capacity for it. And

31:19

remember I did a month-long retreat,

31:21

and the first week was on

31:23

benefactor and on self, and then

31:25

the next week was on focusing

31:28

on the easy people, and

31:30

then the next week was

31:32

finding a neutral person. You

31:34

just choose one person, you

31:36

don't have any antipathy tour,

31:38

but no great attraction. And

31:40

just... for 45 minutes every

31:42

day. You're wishing that person

31:44

well. You're wishing them ease.

31:46

And I chose our retreat

31:48

manager who struck me as

31:50

a kind but unremarkable person.

31:53

And so every day in

31:55

about day five of that

31:57

retreat, of that week, I'm

31:59

just. sitting and she walked into

32:01

the room and like my heart started

32:03

fluttering. I thought, oh my beloved

32:05

has arrived, which is immediately followed

32:07

by like, oh my God, am

32:09

I falling in love with the

32:11

retreat manager? No, but like what

32:14

we pay attention to gets bigger,

32:16

which is again back to the

32:18

yogic thing of like, oh I

32:20

actually, Prana follows chita, what you

32:22

focus on, a felt sense will

32:24

come with it if you entrain

32:26

yourself on it. And the final week

32:28

is on, is choosing the difficult

32:30

person. You know, and a story

32:32

I often tell is when I

32:35

had my interview with the teacher

32:37

that final week with someone who

32:39

really betrayed me, I said, well,

32:42

here's where I am in my

32:44

forgiveness practice. I have come to

32:46

realize I can completely forget this

32:48

person as long as I'm a

32:51

surety burns in hell for eternity.

32:53

Which was progress? Yes. Yeah.

32:55

And then later actually, just

32:57

a few days later, suddenly

33:00

I got the role reversal.

33:02

You know, I was able to

33:04

like, oh, this is what he

33:06

was needing that wasn't happening. This

33:08

is why he threw me under

33:10

the bus and just such an

33:13

incredible rush of insight and

33:15

forgiveness. So all this to say,

33:18

it's a training. You know, it's

33:20

really training ourselves to look

33:22

for the good. And, um... And we

33:24

each have our own path. And we

33:27

each have our own wiring. How

33:29

do we wire ourselves

33:31

to loving presence? It's

33:33

unique for every one

33:35

of us. Yeah. It's interesting.

33:37

You use the term training

33:40

and I would use the term

33:42

on learning. And yet I think

33:44

we're talking about exactly

33:46

the same thing. Yep.

33:48

Exactly. When I listen to

33:50

you, I think. It sounds to

33:52

me. in addition to everything else it

33:55

is, it sounds to me very

33:57

therapeutic. And it makes me wonder...

34:00

Does psychotherapy

34:02

add anything else

34:04

to what it is

34:07

that you're talking

34:09

about? It's a

34:11

really good question.

34:13

You know, for me,

34:16

because my meditation

34:19

practice is

34:21

so central. No.

34:24

It really is

34:26

around awakening. you know,

34:28

whatever you want to call that,

34:30

you know, awakening to true nature,

34:33

awakening to who I am beyond

34:35

a separate self. And I had

34:37

a really interesting conversation with Dr.

34:40

Jenlin way, way, way back when,

34:42

when I was doing my training, one

34:44

of the conferences, and I noted

34:46

how in doing my partnerships

34:48

and so forth, how so

34:50

many people who get trained

34:52

in focusing are psychologically oriented,

34:54

you know, and... And usually you're,

34:56

you know, what I would find

34:58

is when in my partnerships that people

35:01

would have some issue, you know, some

35:03

emotional issue. And as we would move

35:05

into the felt sensing and naming

35:07

and so forth and kind of

35:09

following that model, there'd be some kind

35:11

of a shift. And then as soon as

35:14

there's some kind of shift, it'd be like,

35:16

okay, well, what else can I focus on?

35:18

And I noticed for myself, and this

35:20

was my question to Jenlin, like, like,

35:23

isn't the shift? something

35:25

we should really pay attention

35:28

to because isn't that shift

35:30

a shift in identity?

35:32

Like what happened? Like when

35:35

that issue dissolves along

35:37

with the, along with the

35:39

felt shift, what is that?

35:41

And it was really fun. We

35:43

had a great exchange around

35:46

it and then he kind of

35:48

like guided it back to, you

35:50

know, back to the psychological. But

35:53

I find it's sort of like,

35:55

I'm really kind of sharing your

35:57

question, like what is the difference?

35:59

You know, because when I look

36:01

at the model of rain, you

36:03

know, back to here's what's presenting,

36:06

you know, whether it be of

36:08

physical pain or emotional turmoil or

36:10

mental agitation, you know, you track

36:13

it back to the felt sense,

36:15

you sense, can I be with

36:17

it? And you move into

36:20

that into that investigation.

36:22

I'm not sure there's a difference.

36:24

Yeah, I, I'm at that point as

36:27

well. I keep asking myself

36:29

really. What is the difference?

36:31

What is it, especially if

36:33

you're focusing oriented therapist of

36:36

some kind? What are we offering,

36:38

I guess calling myself one of

36:40

them, what are we offering

36:42

that really is substantially different

36:44

or in any way more

36:46

than what you're describing? And I'm

36:48

not sure. I'm not sure if, apart

36:50

from a regular meeting and the

36:53

relationship that grows from that, but

36:55

otherwise. I'm not too sure, but

36:57

I want to go back to

36:59

what you just said. That's more

37:02

interesting to me is I could imagine

37:04

gentlemen liking the question. And

37:06

I think what you're saying, this is I

37:08

want to say it back to you to

37:10

see if I've got it, is I think

37:13

what you're saying is that you have

37:15

noticed, at least at that time, and

37:17

I would agree if this is what

37:19

you're saying, that in the partnerships, the

37:21

person that's focusing is almost looking

37:24

for What is the psychological trouble

37:26

that I'm dealing with in my

37:28

life at the moment? And finding

37:31

a way to be with that,

37:33

potentially getting some kind of shift

37:35

in their understanding, and then immediately

37:37

looking for, okay, what else is

37:39

here? Or, okay, so what's it

37:41

like now? And kind of following

37:44

the, following the path of the trouble.

37:46

And I think what you're suggesting is,

37:48

hold on a second. Something

37:50

quite profound just happened

37:52

there. Stay longer with that

37:54

shift, you know, and who are

37:57

you now and welcome just

37:59

that. shift and stay with

38:01

that before you start looking

38:03

for any more trouble. Yes,

38:05

it's around can we sustain

38:07

attention on that sort of

38:09

like dissolution of the small

38:12

self? Yes. And open to

38:14

the sense of what's left,

38:16

you know, the awareness itself,

38:18

you know, in the model

38:20

of rain, you know, my

38:22

wife talks about after the

38:24

rain, which is just after

38:26

you've done the inquiry. Slow

38:28

down, check out that space.

38:30

Yeah. Like a question that

38:32

I love, an inquiry, I

38:34

love to work with people

38:36

is when they're aware of

38:38

a pattern, you know, and

38:40

they sense the tendrils of

38:43

that pattern. And I ask,

38:45

who are you without that

38:47

imprint? Wow. Yeah. It's so,

38:49

so powerful. Yeah. Or if

38:51

you're investigating a belief, you

38:53

know, and if you follow

38:55

the model of Byron Katie,

38:57

you know. You know, you

38:59

find a belief that's really

39:01

core. You ask yourself, is

39:03

it true? You know, and

39:05

then is it really true?

39:07

Because the first response is,

39:09

of course, because I believe

39:11

it. And then what's it

39:13

like when you think that

39:16

thought? And in that model,

39:18

so many people hang out

39:20

intellectually. You know, well, here's

39:22

how I view it. But

39:24

if you move from the

39:26

conceptual into the felt sense.

39:28

Like, how does that believe

39:30

live in your nervous system?

39:32

Yeah. You know, when you

39:34

sense how old it is,

39:36

when you sense the tendrils

39:38

of how that, how that

39:40

lives inside, and then you

39:42

throw, then you pull out

39:44

the samurai sword, when there's

39:46

that real sense of this,

39:49

this is how it lives

39:51

on the inside, and you

39:53

ask, who are you without

39:55

that thought? It's just stunning.

39:57

And the question is, like,

39:59

yeah. Yeah. And we bear

40:01

hanging out in that space.

40:03

Yeah. Yeah. Some people. Can't

40:05

yeah, I've literally had people

40:07

fall out of their chair

40:09

on that question And some

40:11

people Will have some capacity

40:13

to hang out there in

40:15

That just that quality of

40:17

presence, you know, where where

40:20

a construct is no longer

40:22

and no longer has any

40:24

ground and how no longer

40:26

has any roots. It's so

40:28

exciting So that's an invitation

40:30

to an experience of self

40:32

that is no longer constricted

40:34

by that identity or belief

40:36

or whatever. An invitation for

40:38

the larger self, whatever you

40:40

want to call that. Yeah,

40:42

well, and you can call

40:44

it anything you want. Yeah,

40:46

exactly. I really like that,

40:48

and I think in the

40:50

focusing world, what you've said

40:53

about it is exactly how

40:55

I would also see it.

40:57

often enough, have a practice

40:59

of, I think, two things.

41:01

One, staying with the body

41:03

that actually isn't in a

41:05

state of trouble and allowing

41:07

it to expand. And then

41:09

it becomes, I think, a

41:11

little bit closer to the

41:13

spiritual practices you're describing. And

41:15

the other opportunity maybe to

41:17

do that is to stay

41:19

with a felt sense that's

41:21

positive, something that feels good

41:23

and to invite more and

41:26

more of it. Exactly. Yes.

41:28

To get more familiar with

41:30

kind of this unbound quality

41:32

of consciousness. Yeah, exactly. Yeah.

41:34

You know, and so I

41:36

think there's some beautiful tools

41:38

that at least have occurred

41:40

to me in my own

41:42

practice of like helping people

41:44

access their own sense of

41:46

wisdom. You know, quite often,

41:48

you know, at the end

41:50

of like a process to

41:52

ask. What advice do you

41:54

have to give yourself? You

41:57

know, which is just a

41:59

very simple way of kind

42:01

of tuning in to wisdom,

42:03

if you will. Or, you

42:05

know, given all that you've

42:07

felt and named, everything that

42:09

shift and moved, what's the

42:11

most important thing in your

42:13

life right now? And then

42:15

again, that sense of like

42:17

listening and waiting can be

42:19

so, so, so powerful. But

42:21

I think a lot of

42:23

it is, again, when we

42:25

put it back in the

42:27

context of... spiritual practice, if

42:30

you will. I'm just reminded

42:32

how in the Zogchen tradition,

42:34

which is kind of the

42:36

non-dual tradition, there's a sutra

42:38

which is considered like the

42:40

flower, like if you distill

42:42

it all down in the

42:44

Zog tradition, all comes down

42:46

to these lines, utterly awake,

42:48

since doors wide open, utterly

42:50

open, non-fix, non-fixating awareness, non-fixating

42:52

awareness, non-fixating awareness, non-fixating awareness,

42:54

non-fix fixating awareness, non-fixating, non-fixating

42:56

fixating awareness-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix- It's

43:00

so powerful because it's about

43:03

opening, opening deeply, since doors

43:05

wide open, and cultivating that

43:08

sense of non-fixating awareness or

43:10

presence. And I think part

43:13

of the focusing experiences were,

43:15

we're getting tiny glimpses or

43:18

big glimpses as we move

43:20

into this kind of inquiry.

43:23

Yeah, I love that. It

43:25

makes me think of two

43:28

different things. One is. that

43:31

if we if we think

43:33

of the focusing practice as

43:36

this gradual expanding or unfolding

43:38

or blossoming or something so

43:40

that the we're guided by

43:43

increasing openness that somehow that

43:45

is the guide that feels

43:48

right to me. Yeah. this

43:50

lens of Buddhist psychology of

43:52

what's called verified faith. You

43:55

know, and verified faith is,

43:57

is where it's not, the

44:00

opposite of verified faith is

44:02

magical thinking. You know, I'll

44:04

just think happy thoughts and

44:07

I'll be happy. But verified

44:09

faith is when you move

44:12

into that openness and you

44:14

realize that when you are

44:16

open and when you are

44:19

curious and when you can

44:21

access loving presence that there's

44:24

a power and a potency

44:26

is that you become you

44:28

have more and more of

44:31

a verified sense of this

44:33

is this is a journey

44:35

this is a technique this

44:38

is a process that that

44:40

works because it's worked before

44:43

and I think that's part

44:45

of like the you know

44:47

what growing our prefrontal cortex

44:50

and all that all that

44:52

stuff that happens but but

44:55

just that sense of like

44:57

a deepening sense of trust

44:59

in and how this process

45:02

of unfolding or awakening happens.

45:04

Yes it also reminds me

45:07

of the the first step

45:09

as Jen then first conceived

45:11

of it of clearing a

45:14

space. and how that

45:16

sometimes, and I know in

45:18

my own practice when I

45:20

have started with clearing a

45:22

space, often I don't go

45:24

on and focus. None of

45:26

those things seem very important

45:28

anymore. The cleared space was

45:30

the answer somehow. Yeah, yeah,

45:32

yeah. Yeah, what's between you

45:34

and feeling free is a

45:36

really powerful co-an. Yeah, you

45:38

know, because you have to

45:40

actually tune in to what

45:42

freedom is. Exactly. Yeah. Would

45:44

you see focusing as a

45:46

non-dual practice? I think it

45:48

has the possibility. I really

45:50

think it does. You know,

45:52

I think there's a tendency

45:54

to think that non- non-dual

45:56

means you're divorced from your

45:58

body, you know, that it's

46:00

just pure, it's just pure

46:02

awareness without a body. When

46:04

I, and when I go

46:06

back to that Zogjansutra, which

46:08

has been around for, you

46:10

know, a couple thousand years,

46:12

it's actually about awakened, awakened

46:14

in the felt sense. And

46:16

if you look at it

46:18

through the yoga perspective, you

46:20

know, it's the, it's the

46:22

purified. Like there's a quality

46:24

of purification. You know, yoga

46:26

talks about krias. You know,

46:29

and krias are the purification

46:31

experience. It's what you call

46:33

distressing. You know, when you're

46:35

doing, when you're working with

46:37

the gross sensations in the

46:39

body, and you come in

46:41

contact with like a really

46:43

deep tension, and you breathe

46:45

into it, and you kind

46:47

of ride the wave of

46:49

that energy, and you feel

46:51

like shift and move, that's

46:53

a kria. You know, you

46:55

just let go of something

46:57

out of something out of

46:59

your nervous system, out of

47:01

your nervous system. And I

47:03

think in many ways, this

47:05

is just a continued refined

47:07

process, which is like embodied

47:09

wakefulness. Does that make sense?

47:11

Yeah, it does make, well,

47:13

it certainly makes intuitive sense.

47:15

I listen to you. My

47:17

body agrees. I'm slower, but

47:19

my body agrees. It makes

47:21

me curious about your... The

47:23

way that, I mean, I

47:25

don't even know exactly how

47:27

to ask this question, but

47:29

what somehow the way that

47:31

you would bring focusing into

47:33

meditation potentially or the way

47:35

that you would in your

47:37

focusing practice emphasize particular things

47:39

such that your meditation experience

47:41

comes into it. How do

47:43

they somehow go together for

47:45

you? If we think of

47:47

mindfulness. That's non-judging awareness. Yeah.

47:49

That's the definition that works

47:51

for me, you know, non-judging

47:53

awareness. And back to the

47:55

Ashan days, my guru's guru

47:57

said, before he went back

47:59

to India at the end

48:01

of his life to die,

48:03

he was asked, what's the

48:05

highest quality of a spiritual

48:07

seeker? I thought for sure

48:09

he was going to say,

48:11

whatever you're enjoying, stop it,

48:13

you know, work harder, you

48:15

know, knuckle down. But he

48:17

said the highest quality of

48:19

a seeker is self-obervation without

48:21

judgment. Wow, we could try

48:23

that on. It's really, really

48:25

quite potent. Yes. And so

48:27

I think when we're in

48:29

a, we're in a, in

48:31

like a meditative experience, you

48:33

know, we sort of have

48:35

the gross sensations, you know,

48:37

and then we have all

48:39

the subtle stuff going on.

48:41

But as I like to

48:43

say, you know, when you

48:45

meditate, you feel better. You

48:47

know, you feel your depression

48:49

better, you feel your sadness

48:51

better, you feel your anger

48:53

better. It's all there ripe

48:55

for awareness. And there's some

48:57

meditative techniques that are about

48:59

just focus on concentration, you

49:01

know, do not indulge, you

49:03

know. But then, you know,

49:05

and there's a lot to

49:07

be said for like the

49:09

calming practices, the concentration practices,

49:11

but what I like about

49:13

vapassa in particular is when

49:15

something arises that's persistent that's

49:17

persistent. something that you intuitively

49:19

feel is calling for investigation.

49:21

You move from your anchor,

49:24

you know, a breath or

49:26

sound or whatever it may

49:28

be to focus on the

49:30

phenomena itself. And that's where

49:32

the rain practice comes in.

49:34

Okay, let me get familiar

49:36

with this. You may be

49:38

familiar with the, you know,

49:40

the old story of the

49:42

yogini in her cave. And

49:44

she's just meditating and these

49:46

three demons come into her

49:48

cave and they're... whirling around

49:50

and making all this noise

49:52

and very calmly she gets

49:54

up she starts building a

49:56

little fire and she's so

49:58

non-re The demons, and they

50:00

get really annoyed, so they

50:02

crank it up, you know.

50:04

Horrible sounds and images, and

50:06

again, it's so non-reactive, she

50:08

puts a teacettle on the

50:10

fire, and this enrages them,

50:12

so they throw everything they

50:14

got at her. And she

50:16

sets out these teacups, and

50:18

finally they say, what gives?

50:20

Where were your three deepest

50:22

wounds, your three worst nightmares?

50:24

And here you are building

50:26

this fire, and putting out

50:28

these teacups, and... What's going

50:30

on? And she says, well,

50:32

you've been here before and

50:34

you'll be here again. So

50:36

in the meantime, what kind

50:38

of tea would you like?

50:40

That's the practice. It's how

50:42

do we have tea with

50:44

our demons when they arise?

50:46

Yeah. So that's where I

50:48

think this model of investigation,

50:50

you know, we can apply

50:52

it on so many levels,

50:54

you know, I always love

50:56

this model of. At

50:58

the core is what we could call

51:00

Prana. You know, it's undifferentiated energy. And

51:03

then that gets experience of pleasant, unpleasant,

51:05

or neutral. That kicks in thought forms.

51:07

If you think the same thought a

51:10

thousand times, it calcifies into a belief.

51:12

If you're not aware of the beliefs

51:14

in your life, they form your habits.

51:17

If you're not aware of your habits,

51:19

they form your character, and if you're

51:21

not aware of your character structure, that's

51:24

your destiny. And we can explore and

51:26

investigate on any one of those levels.

51:28

You know, we can look at our

51:31

habits, we can look at our beliefs,

51:33

but fundamentally it brings us back to

51:35

how does this live on the inside,

51:38

you know, can I, can I work

51:40

with it energetically, you know, and catch

51:42

it kind of before it proliferates. So

51:45

is this sort of a daily life

51:47

practice for you as you go through

51:49

your day? Do you have a way

51:52

of kind of bringing yourself back, checking

51:54

in with you or checking in with

51:56

you? For

51:59

me. particularly with the state

52:01

of the planet and the

52:03

state of politics. You know,

52:05

I had a pretty big

52:07

realization. I need to be

52:09

more plugged in the presence

52:11

than I ever have just

52:13

with all the challenges here.

52:16

So I've upped my daily

52:18

sitting pretty, pretty, dramatically. And

52:20

it, boy, does it make

52:22

a difference. You know, it

52:24

so makes a difference. And

52:26

again, within the context of

52:28

my practice, there. their practices

52:30

within practices, you know, the

52:33

practices of arriving, you know,

52:35

of concentration, you know, and

52:37

then the practices of actively

52:39

investigating something that might be

52:41

coming up and the practices

52:43

of just surrender and resting

52:45

and presence. But what I

52:48

was so what's so core

52:50

and foundational to me is

52:52

the experience I've had in

52:54

focusing, you know, which is

52:56

Can I work with the

52:58

gross challenges when they arise?

53:00

But also, and this is

53:02

where it gets really interesting

53:05

for me, is when I'm

53:07

beginning to open into expansive

53:09

states, can I stay present

53:11

to them? And that's where

53:13

I find the practice gets

53:15

so subtle and so refined.

53:17

Like there's a question I

53:19

ask myself sometimes, depending on

53:22

my state. toward the end,

53:24

I like to ask myself,

53:26

who am I in the

53:28

absence of desire? This, that

53:30

question kind of like, really

53:32

kind of sets the stage

53:34

for sensing just pure, pure

53:36

presence. What helps me sustain

53:39

that awareness is, is opening

53:41

to the felt sense. Mm-hmm.

53:43

Like the, like the felt

53:45

sense of expansion, you know,

53:47

the felt sense, you know,

53:49

the felt sense, you know,

53:51

the felt sense, you know,

53:53

the felt sense, you know,

53:56

the felt sense of, you

53:58

know, of spaciousness. It's all

54:00

integral but on a very

54:02

subtle level. at least in

54:04

my experience. Can I ask

54:06

through your practice? What understanding

54:08

have you come to about

54:11

what a human being is,

54:13

what existence is? Have you

54:15

found any way of understanding

54:17

that really rings true when

54:19

you're really open in the

54:21

way you've been describing that

54:23

that really rings true when

54:25

you're open in the way

54:28

you've been describing? Wow,

54:30

that is such a powerful

54:33

question. It's, it's challenging to

54:35

find, to find words for

54:37

that. Um, I do think,

54:39

again, this is a stumbling

54:41

quality of, uh, approach here

54:44

is, um, it's kind of

54:46

back to that inquiry of

54:48

who am I in the

54:50

absence of desire. Yeah, it's

54:52

like that. It just points

54:55

toward that quality of of

54:57

spacious, spacious presence. And what

54:59

I kind of notice for

55:01

myself is the more I

55:03

immerse myself in that, the

55:06

more it kind of touches

55:08

into everything. The less I

55:10

believe my thoughts. The more

55:12

I'm aware of these kind

55:14

of unconscious beliefs that kick

55:17

in without even being aware

55:19

of it. You know, the

55:21

more I'm aware of Vedina,

55:23

you know, of that feeling

55:25

tone, you know, the more

55:28

aware I am of the

55:30

unconscious pushing away or grasping.

55:32

It's sort of like that

55:34

whole idea, you know, in

55:36

the analogy of when you

55:39

think of indigenous tribes who

55:41

like use indigo dye, you

55:43

know, you've got this bipod

55:45

of... an intense blue and

55:47

you dip in the white

55:50

fabric and you pull it

55:52

out, you hang it up

55:54

to dry and it dry.

55:56

almost bone white but a

55:58

little bit of the blue

56:00

you know and then you

56:03

dip it again and depending

56:05

on how how much you

56:07

dip it it takes on

56:09

it takes on the hue

56:11

of the dye and I

56:14

think in many ways it's

56:16

the same thing you know

56:18

like wherever we point our

56:20

attention we tend to take

56:22

on the qualities of that

56:25

wherever we reside wherever our

56:27

attention resides. Which is why

56:29

I find it so powerful,

56:31

and I imagine you do

56:33

too, the more I immerse

56:36

myself into practice, but also

56:38

the more I'm in this

56:40

relational field of supporting people

56:42

in this inquiry, the more

56:44

it sort of permeates my,

56:47

you know, who I am,

56:49

at least right now. Do

56:51

you find that to be

56:53

true? Yeah, I do. But

56:55

I think for me, it's...

56:58

moments on my own, either

57:00

when I am purposely investigating,

57:02

with that question, you know,

57:04

once I'm in touch with

57:06

the more expansive body, that

57:09

question of, um, either, well,

57:11

every time I have to

57:13

find the right way of

57:15

phrasing it, but something like,

57:17

what is this? or what

57:20

am I? And then noticing

57:22

that even asking the question

57:24

somehow is too small for

57:26

the inquiry, the only other

57:28

time is usually when I'm

57:31

on my own, I actually

57:33

find it more difficult when

57:35

I'm with other people unless

57:37

we're in a focusing practice

57:39

or meditative kind of shared

57:42

space. But like in conversation

57:44

or something with other people,

57:46

I can find it difficult

57:48

to keep the openness in

57:50

myself. I'm curious,

57:53

when you're working with someone

57:55

and they, they experience a

57:57

felt shift and part of

57:59

that felt shift. is into

58:02

a sense of like non-identification,

58:04

a sense of expansiveness, you

58:06

know. How do you help

58:08

them sustain attention on that?

58:10

If I'm working with the

58:13

client I would simply say

58:15

let's not move on from

58:17

this, let's just stay with

58:19

this, let's welcome it, let

58:22

your body fully have this,

58:24

let it move and expand

58:26

as much as it wants

58:28

to, and let's just see

58:30

if it's okay simply to

58:33

allow that. I would say

58:35

that kind of thing over

58:37

and over again. That's awesome.

58:39

That's great. You know, whatever

58:42

I lead, a meditation, you

58:44

know, I will always point

58:46

toward resting and presence. So

58:48

many of us, we need

58:50

the, you know, we need

58:53

the practice of gathering and

58:55

arriving, you know, we need

58:57

the practice of conscious relaxation.

58:59

We need the practice of

59:01

being the witness of what's

59:04

changing. But all roads ultimately

59:06

point toward resting and presence.

59:08

And I think it's kind

59:10

of the same in a

59:13

focusing session. You know, is

59:15

that when there are those

59:17

moments where there just is

59:19

that sense of presence that

59:21

emerges where the small self

59:24

gets more permeable or drops

59:26

away, to get familiar with

59:28

that is just so juicy.

59:30

Yeah, I agree. It doesn't

59:33

happen all that often in

59:35

my experience, but when it

59:37

does, I certainly slow down

59:39

and really encourage welcoming it.

59:41

But how about when you're

59:44

in a conversation with other

59:46

people, not necessarily a difficult

59:48

conversation where, you know, you

59:50

violently disagree about something, but

59:52

just ordinary conversation, do you

59:55

have a way? Because of

59:57

all the practice that you've

59:59

done, do you have a

1:00:01

way of kind of gently

1:00:04

bringing yourself back to that

1:00:06

state of presence. So you

1:00:08

don't get too pulled into

1:00:10

a conversation, for example, or

1:00:12

a particular discussion. That's a

1:00:15

while. That's such a great

1:00:17

question. You know, I think

1:00:19

when we look at the

1:00:21

Buddhist lens, one of the

1:00:24

things the Buddha allegedly said,

1:00:26

I mean, he knows what

1:00:28

he said, nothing was written

1:00:30

down for a couple hundred

1:00:32

years, but he, you know,

1:00:35

one of the things pretty

1:00:37

emphatic about, he said nothing

1:00:39

is to be clung to

1:00:41

his eye or mine. Nothing

1:00:43

whatsoever is to be clung

1:00:46

to his eye or mine.

1:00:48

And when we have those

1:00:50

moments when I or mine

1:00:52

either becomes permeable or drops

1:00:55

away, those are the mystical

1:00:57

moments. And so I kind

1:00:59

of look for, again, in

1:01:01

very imperfect ways, ways that

1:01:03

I can allow myself to

1:01:06

become more permeable. Yes. And

1:01:08

one of the questions I

1:01:10

often will ask is, I

1:01:12

kind of... to tune myself

1:01:15

to the unmet need if

1:01:17

I'm in conversation to ask

1:01:19

myself, what is this person

1:01:21

needing right now? And that's

1:01:23

a really powerful way of

1:01:26

sort of like opening up

1:01:28

the field a little bit

1:01:30

more. Yeah. What I typically

1:01:32

do is if I'm at

1:01:34

a dinner table, for example,

1:01:37

is if I can feel

1:01:39

myself getting too narrow down

1:01:41

into something... is I expand

1:01:43

my awareness to the whole

1:01:46

table and almost kind of

1:01:48

invite myself to be the

1:01:50

whole situation, the whole setting,

1:01:52

rather than a separate self

1:01:54

within it. And even though

1:01:57

I can't completely accomplish that,

1:01:59

it does enough to broaden

1:02:01

my experience again. Let's see,

1:02:03

a group, that's what you're

1:02:06

doing. Yes. You are opening,

1:02:08

you're opening to the collective.

1:02:10

Yes. Opens up more possibility

1:02:12

and creativity and allowing you

1:02:14

to bring, to bring presence

1:02:17

to the group. Yes, I

1:02:19

do. I invite my body

1:02:21

to be the room rather

1:02:23

than myself. It's helpful for

1:02:25

me. Yeah. Yeah, that's. That's

1:02:30

juicy. I have one of

1:02:32

my favorite words. I'm just

1:02:34

aware of the time. I

1:02:37

want to ask. What are

1:02:39

you kind of most passionate

1:02:41

about at this point in

1:02:44

your life or what are

1:02:46

you developing or yeah anything

1:02:48

else that you would like

1:02:51

to add so people know

1:02:53

about it? Well, I have

1:02:55

a weekly talk that I

1:02:58

do and my My, um,

1:03:00

my, I like to think

1:03:02

of what I offer is,

1:03:05

is what pragmatic Darma, you

1:03:07

know, it's like, how do

1:03:09

we apply these ancient teachings

1:03:12

to the phone call you're

1:03:14

dreading next week, you know,

1:03:16

that's, that's a passion of

1:03:19

mine. But another project I'm

1:03:21

working on is something I've

1:03:23

been fascinated with, just through

1:03:26

my own life experience, and

1:03:28

the working title is transforming

1:03:30

your relationship to pain, kind

1:03:33

of a chronic pain companion.

1:03:35

And it's about 10 or

1:03:37

12 attentional strategies for working

1:03:40

with physical pain. And that's

1:03:42

just fascinating. Yeah. Just really.

1:03:44

There's so many options when

1:03:47

it comes to the experience

1:03:49

of pain that we don't,

1:03:51

that we forget because we

1:03:54

get so locked into fear

1:03:56

and self-preservation. So it's basically

1:03:58

offering. kind of like warm

1:04:01

guidance in your ear. to

1:04:03

explore some different ways of

1:04:05

working with it. And of

1:04:08

course, emotional pain is physical

1:04:10

pain. It can be applied,

1:04:12

you know, across the board.

1:04:15

But the primary thing is,

1:04:17

what do you, how do

1:04:19

you work at when, when

1:04:22

it feels like it's too

1:04:24

much, you know? Yeah, that

1:04:26

sounds incredibly useful. And that,

1:04:29

where could people find your

1:04:31

thinking about that? Well, I've

1:04:33

got a website and YouTube

1:04:36

channel, just my name. And

1:04:38

product, probably, I'm hoping it'll

1:04:40

be out in the next

1:04:43

couple months. Okay, perfect. Yeah.

1:04:45

Yeah, I'll put your website

1:04:47

so people can find you.

1:04:50

I have one more question.

1:04:52

Which? I'm happy to make

1:04:54

up an answer. Okay, terrific.

1:04:57

I'm thinking. especially when I

1:04:59

speak to people that live

1:05:01

in America. And I mean,

1:05:04

not only America, because the

1:05:06

whole world is suffering in

1:05:08

kind of new ways, it

1:05:11

feels like, although probably not

1:05:13

very new, but in America

1:05:15

where you've recently had this

1:05:18

election that again seemed to

1:05:20

really kind of divide the

1:05:22

nation. Do

1:05:25

you have ways or can

1:05:27

you think of ways or

1:05:29

are you interested in attempts

1:05:32

to bring some of the

1:05:34

things you've been talking about

1:05:36

whether it's things you've learned

1:05:39

from yoga or from Buddhism

1:05:41

or from focusing or just

1:05:43

the overall kind of attitude

1:05:45

that comes with these practices?

1:05:48

Are there ways of bringing

1:05:50

that to the nation? somehow

1:05:52

to the society, to groups,

1:05:55

to the community that you

1:05:57

think could be helpful at

1:05:59

this. point. That's such a such

1:06:02

a rich and deep question.

1:06:04

You know, I think it's

1:06:06

it's interesting to watch kind

1:06:08

of the reactivity in the

1:06:11

in this culture because right

1:06:13

now so many people are

1:06:15

burned out. You know, there's such

1:06:17

a sense of a hopelessness

1:06:20

and a sense of feeling

1:06:22

disempowered, you know, such a

1:06:24

sense of despair and a

1:06:26

lot of people are just

1:06:28

saying We just have to

1:06:31

wait and see, which is very

1:06:33

challenging, and I experienced

1:06:35

a lot of that myself, you

1:06:37

know. But I know for myself,

1:06:39

and part of mine is like,

1:06:41

again, back to those two questions

1:06:44

of what's happening, and how does

1:06:46

it just want me to be

1:06:48

with it? You know, for me,

1:06:50

it's around, I need to be

1:06:52

plugged in, you know. I want

1:06:55

my cup to be overflowing because

1:06:57

I know that when I respond

1:06:59

out of anger, I have a

1:07:02

certain degree of effectiveness in the

1:07:04

world. If I can respond

1:07:06

with compassion, it's a different

1:07:08

degree of effectiveness

1:07:10

in the world, you know. And I

1:07:13

think part of it, you know, kind

1:07:15

of back to the old, sickness old

1:07:17

age and death, is really looking at,

1:07:19

you know, we each need to look

1:07:22

closely at our suffering. and

1:07:24

how to respond to it. And

1:07:26

I really do feel like we

1:07:28

are in a big unknown

1:07:30

in our culture right now.

1:07:33

I don't know how things will

1:07:35

coalesce. As someone

1:07:37

said, just from a

1:07:39

political point of view,

1:07:41

the question is, with

1:07:44

the new administration, will

1:07:46

they provide customer

1:07:48

satisfaction? And if

1:07:51

they don't, then... Something's

1:07:53

gonna shift again. And so

1:07:55

I'm not I'm not being

1:07:58

really articulate here. But

1:08:00

I think there is, I really

1:08:02

do feel there is a sense

1:08:05

of how do we be with

1:08:07

it and no one really knows

1:08:10

right now. Yeah. Yeah, what I'm

1:08:12

getting from what you're

1:08:15

saying partially at

1:08:17

least is as a

1:08:19

citizen to take it as

1:08:21

your responsibility

1:08:23

to some extent to

1:08:26

be adding... more awareness

1:08:28

rather than simply more

1:08:30

content. Yeah, yeah. And as

1:08:32

someone pointed out, you

1:08:35

know, to be curious, you

1:08:37

know, to be curious, what

1:08:39

can I learn? You know, what can

1:08:41

I learn? You know, what is, what

1:08:43

is, what is, you know, the

1:08:46

world is run by unmet needs,

1:08:48

you know, what are the unmet

1:08:50

needs? And how do we, how

1:08:52

do we, how do we attune to

1:08:55

that? Deep in

1:08:57

interesting times, you know,

1:08:59

yeah, yeah, and yeah, it's

1:09:01

yeah, it it it makes

1:09:03

me subtly excited when you

1:09:06

say it that way We know

1:09:08

when when people ask me

1:09:10

how's your how's your

1:09:13

business? My classic response

1:09:15

is I said well,

1:09:17

I'm in the suffering

1:09:19

industry, you know, business

1:09:21

is booming, you know

1:09:24

And you know, we wake up out

1:09:26

of suffering if we really, if we

1:09:29

really look at it. And I

1:09:31

think part of, you know, I

1:09:33

just notice how, you know, you

1:09:36

know how, I particularly noticed among

1:09:38

folks who have like chronic issues

1:09:40

they don't address. And as they

1:09:42

get old and older, they become

1:09:45

almost cartoon characters. You know, in

1:09:47

many ways, you know, like the

1:09:49

suffering that's emerging is so chronic

1:09:52

we can't miss it now. And

1:09:54

it will get our

1:09:56

attention, you know, at

1:09:58

some point. And the

1:10:01

question is, can

1:10:03

we respond

1:10:05

to it? Yeah. Yeah.

1:10:07

That's a really interesting

1:10:11

reminder of

1:10:13

what to watch out

1:10:15

for in one's aging.

1:10:18

Yeah. Okay, thank

1:10:20

you very much. I've really enjoyed

1:10:22

talking with you and I'm really

1:10:24

glad. This has been great. Thank

1:10:26

you so much. I so appreciate

1:10:28

you and all that you do

1:10:30

and all that you offer and

1:10:32

what a great resource that you

1:10:34

are. Likewise. And yeah, I want

1:10:36

to make sure that people can get

1:10:39

in contact with you. Great.

1:10:41

Thank you very much. Thank you.

1:10:43

Thanks so much. Take care. Bye.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features