Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The following talk is
0:02
offered freely to ensure
0:05
no one is denied
0:07
access to these
0:09
practices and to these
0:11
teachings. If you feel
0:13
inspired to make a
0:15
donation to support this
0:17
offering you can go
0:19
to my website at
0:21
www. Jonathan Faust.com. And
0:23
while you're there, you
0:25
can also sign up
0:27
for a monthly newsletter
0:30
designed to support you in
0:32
your practice. It'd be a pleasure to have
0:34
you as part of our community. Thank you
0:36
and enjoy. If
0:50
you listen to any of my
0:52
talks or meditations or do any
0:54
retreats with me, you know that
0:57
I'm a pretty body-based semantic inquiry
0:59
kind of guy. And a lot of
1:01
my understanding around this is informed
1:03
by the work of Dr. Eugene
1:06
Genlin and the whole realm and
1:08
discipline of what's called focusing.
1:10
And I'd like to share with you
1:12
today and interview I had with Dr.
1:14
Greg Madison. Greg is in
1:16
my estimation an awesome person. An
1:19
awesome person. He's an
1:21
existential and focusing-oriented
1:23
psychologist. He's a passionate focusing
1:25
teacher. He's dedicated to
1:27
supporting people looking to deepen self-awareness
1:30
and clarity in their life.
1:32
And he has a podcast called
1:34
The Living Process, wherein he interviews
1:37
lots of luminaries and leaders in
1:39
this area of focusing and semantic
1:41
exploration. I really feel honored to
1:44
be part of the conversation. He's
1:46
a deep thinker. He's an empathic listener.
1:48
I think you'll enjoy all of
1:50
his offerings, so I'm going to
1:52
include information about his podcast and
1:55
his work in the show notes. And
1:57
as this is a pretty long interview
1:59
about an... we will forego the
2:01
opening meditation we usually have
2:04
and go right into the
2:06
conversation. And Greg starts this off
2:08
with kind of an overview in a
2:10
summary, so I will leave all of
2:12
that to him. So I hope you find
2:15
the following helpful and
2:17
many blessings. Hello, my name
2:19
is Greg Madison and welcome
2:21
to this episode of The
2:23
Living Process. It's Christmas Eve
2:26
and my special guest this
2:28
time is Jonathan Faust. Jonathan
2:31
is very well known within
2:33
Buddhist communities and also in
2:35
yoga. He is trained in
2:37
a whole list of
2:40
different somatic practices including
2:42
focusing. We talk quite a
2:44
bit about how Jonathan combines
2:47
his understanding as well
2:49
as practice focusing with
2:51
some of these other
2:54
traditions. He describes his
2:56
own personal journey. which is
2:58
very interesting and he's dedicated
3:01
his life to these various
3:03
practices and it really shows
3:05
in the way that he
3:07
interacts and the responses he
3:10
gives to some of my
3:12
questions. We talk a little
3:14
bit about what the body is
3:16
and about energy flow through
3:18
the body. We also end by
3:20
talking a little bit about how
3:22
to bring some of these
3:25
practices or... an attitude of
3:27
compassion to the sort of
3:29
uncertainties in the world today
3:31
and how not to just
3:33
jump into the divisions that we
3:36
see in a lot of
3:38
societies. I really enjoyed
3:40
the conversation. He's a delightful
3:42
man to converse with and
3:45
yeah I hope you really
3:47
enjoy this episode with Jonathan
3:49
Faust. Welcome
4:04
back to the living process
4:07
and my guest this time
4:09
is Jonathan Faust. Welcome
4:11
Jonathan. Thank you. It's a
4:13
it's a privilege and an
4:16
honor to be here with you.
4:18
Yeah well it's a real pleasure
4:20
to have you as a guest.
4:23
We worked quite hard to make
4:25
this happen. Yes it took it
4:27
took some some resilience to make
4:29
this happen. It did. The
4:32
first thing I'd like to ask
4:34
people, and I'd like to ask you,
4:36
is particularly I know
4:38
that you have a much broader kind
4:40
of sense of different traditions
4:42
than just focusing. But if
4:45
I start with the focusing
4:47
question, I'm curious how you
4:49
found focusing or got introduced
4:52
to it or your kind
4:54
of journey with the focusing
4:56
process. Yeah, yeah. Well, that
4:58
question automatically makes me feel
5:01
old. I look back, I feel
5:03
like that old prospector, you know,
5:05
let's see, I was back in
5:07
83. So way back when I had
5:09
been in the Peace Corps,
5:12
I was teaching in a
5:14
university, teaching phonetics and linguistics,
5:17
and just to shake up
5:19
my life, I attempted to
5:21
be the first American to
5:23
cross the Sahara Desert on
5:26
my bicycle from the south,
5:28
which didn't happen. And I
5:30
ended up going through all
5:32
kinds of crazy adventures, and
5:34
I actually ended up stumbling
5:37
into an ashram, literally stumbling
5:39
into an ashram when I
5:41
was, I think, 25. And
5:43
there was this book, Jenlin's
5:46
book, Unfocuseding. And I picked
5:48
it up, and I just read a
5:51
little bit of it, and I
5:53
did a little reflection, and I
5:55
had this really powerful shift. like
5:57
a really dramatic shift.
5:59
And it was like, wow,
6:01
there's something really, really juicy here.
6:04
And then I got sucked
6:06
into ashram life, and so, which
6:08
was a very, very deep, deep
6:11
immersion into yoga, you know, into
6:13
the whole field of energy
6:15
and exploring all of that, you
6:17
know, kind of the, maybe we can
6:19
talk more about, about that and
6:22
how to sort of, how that's
6:24
come into my own practice with
6:26
focusing. So I got to put
6:28
the book down, got very immersed
6:30
into that world, and we did
6:32
a, it was a very sense-based
6:35
couple decades. You know, I'd like
6:37
to joke, I came for lunch
6:39
and I stayed for 23 years
6:41
in the ashra. And then when
6:43
my time was done and we
6:45
went through all kinds of changes
6:47
as a community, we had to
6:50
re-visualize ourselves after we
6:52
had a kind of a meltdown
6:54
with our our guru, our teacher
6:56
and... for a couple years I
6:59
was president and then I was
7:01
done. And then I moved down
7:03
to Washington DC, fell in love
7:05
with my wife and I remembered,
7:08
oh focusing, I want to get
7:10
back to that. So I did
7:12
my training with Robert Lee and
7:15
domain focusing, which is fantastic. And
7:17
at the time I was very
7:19
deeply immersed in Buddhist psychology and
7:21
sort of teaching through that lens
7:24
and just a synergy. of my
7:26
training, the whole felt sense of
7:28
my own learning and offering it
7:31
out into the world has
7:33
just been fantastic. So from
7:35
there, I've done a year-long
7:38
training, I've done 10 times
7:40
where we do a whole
7:42
year of deep immersion into
7:45
into the practice in the
7:47
context of meditation and Buddha
7:49
psychology. So that was a
7:52
long response to a very,
7:54
very simple question. Immediately, I'm
7:56
very curious about sort
8:00
of the different avenues, if I
8:02
could call them that, the Buddhist,
8:05
the yoga, and then the focusing
8:07
that it sounds like it came
8:09
in briefly, it receded, and then
8:11
it came back. And I'm curious how
8:14
those three go together if they
8:16
do, or do they remain separate
8:18
for you? It's all one whole, one
8:20
whole, mish-mash, but in essence,
8:22
and what was so interesting
8:25
was having that sort of
8:27
like epiphany experience of reading.
8:29
reading Genle's book and being
8:31
so immersed into the whole
8:33
realm of yoga, my guru's
8:35
guru said that the whole world
8:37
is made up of two elements.
8:40
In Sanskrit, it's referred
8:42
to as chita and prana,
8:44
awareness and energy. And in those
8:46
two realms of energy and awareness,
8:49
you have the whole span of
8:51
awareness from from thoughts to beliefs
8:53
to states to awareness itself. and
8:55
the realm of energy we have
8:57
we've got life force we have
8:59
the feeling tone of the life
9:02
force we have kind of the
9:04
expression of life force and our
9:06
entire life is about balancing chit
9:08
that prana so when you're two
9:10
in your head you come home you've been
9:12
wound up after a long day what do
9:14
you want to do you gonna drink a
9:16
beer you're gonna put in some
9:19
music you know dance around the
9:21
room work out take your dog
9:23
for a walk do something to
9:25
get the energy flowing And then
9:27
the times when there's too much
9:29
energy were kind of over-prongified, if
9:31
you will, you know, or strong
9:34
emotion or hypervigilance, we kind of,
9:36
we want to, we want to
9:38
get a handle on what's going.
9:40
So we're going to kind of
9:42
lean into more of the conceptual.
9:44
So we're always trying to balance
9:46
these two things out. And yoga
9:49
is about, really about exploring
9:51
this, the awakening of this energy.
9:54
And part of what the suggestion is
9:56
that that energy or Prana or life
9:58
force or cheap or or holy
10:00
spirit, is it possible that
10:02
it is intelligent and evolutionary?
10:05
And if we can deeply
10:07
listen to it, is it
10:09
possible that it is bringing
10:11
us inexorably toward a more
10:13
awakened quality of awareness? So
10:15
I'm immediately curious whether that
10:17
is perhaps different language and
10:20
maybe even a different understanding,
10:22
but also applies to what
10:24
we do in focusing when
10:26
we bring our awareness to
10:28
a felt sense. Is that
10:30
the same as Prana and
10:32
Chita? To my mind, absolutely.
10:35
Absolutely. Because what happens, let's
10:37
say, just to bring it
10:39
back to yoga. Yeah. Let's
10:41
say you're in a yoga
10:43
posture, you know, you're in
10:45
like the triangle pose, you
10:47
know, trichinacena, and you're suffering,
10:49
you know. You're hanging on
10:52
for dear life. You're aware
10:54
of what's not moving. You're
10:56
aware of what's congested, what's
10:58
stagnant, what's stuck. And you
11:00
breathe into it. And you
11:02
relax into it. You feel
11:04
into it. You get more
11:07
familiar with it. And then
11:09
what happens is that... stagnant,
11:11
congested stuck energy will begin
11:13
to move. It'll begin to
11:15
shift. And then you feel
11:17
the rush, the endorphan rush
11:19
of that release of tension.
11:22
And then what happens is,
11:24
again, if energy is intelligent
11:26
and evolutionary, it'll go to
11:28
the next place where it's
11:30
blocked, because it's designed to
11:32
move into a sense of
11:34
free flow, if you will.
11:36
So it's the same thing.
11:39
In my simplified view. Yeah,
11:41
I mean that's really interesting
11:43
to me. As I listen
11:45
to you, I was thinking
11:47
it sounds very similar, different
11:49
kind of conceptualization of what's
11:51
happening perhaps, but... Very similar,
11:54
and then I thought, are
11:56
we talking about the same
11:58
body? Because when you're talking
12:00
about the yoga body, it
12:02
sounds like in some way,
12:04
I think you're talking about
12:06
more than this, but in
12:09
some way you're talking about
12:11
the physiological body and tension,
12:13
muscle tension, but that signifies
12:15
more than just muscle tension,
12:17
is that right? Yoga describes
12:19
it as the prona body.
12:21
It's the energy body. Okay.
12:23
Yeah, so it's a subtle
12:26
body. Okay, so that's similar
12:28
to focusing then, the films.
12:30
Yeah. Absolutely, absolutely. Yeah. And
12:32
how I view it is,
12:34
we have this level of
12:36
a pure prana of life
12:38
force, which is kind of
12:41
undifferentiated. You know, it's neither
12:43
good nor bad. And then,
12:45
and then here, it kind
12:47
of brings them sort of
12:49
like the Buddhist perspective is.
12:51
That experience of energy is
12:53
immediately experienced in one of
12:56
three categories of pleasant, unpleasant,
12:58
or neutral. And the Buddhist
13:00
angle is referred to as
13:02
beta-na. It's the feeling tone.
13:04
And then without being aware,
13:06
usually, we react to the
13:08
feeling tone. And then that
13:10
will kick off. It kicks
13:13
off the associations, memories, thoughts,
13:15
all the reactive patterns, usually
13:17
wanting to move away from
13:19
unpleasant, increase pleasure, and get
13:21
bored with the neutral. Yeah.
13:23
So this is jumping way
13:25
ahead, but I have to
13:28
ask it now. Because that
13:30
sounds like a very full
13:32
understanding and practice. And I'm
13:34
wondering what would have made
13:36
you interested in kind of
13:38
coming back to focusing? A
13:40
couple things. This goes back
13:43
to my own history, kind
13:45
of back to the back
13:47
of the whole. you know,
13:49
living in spiritual community and
13:51
this whole kind of immersed
13:53
in the energetic world. I
13:55
became fascinated with, what does
13:57
it mean to heal? You
14:00
know, so I got trained
14:02
in lots of hands-on modalities.
14:04
You know, we're working with
14:06
energy, you know, trigger work,
14:08
structural acupressure, cranial sacral, and
14:10
it's just fascinated by how,
14:12
like, how subtly can we
14:15
detect what's not flowing, bring
14:17
attention to it. And then
14:19
sort of track that energetic
14:21
release and, you know, where
14:23
it goes next. It's endlessly
14:25
fascinating to me. So years
14:27
later, when I kind of
14:30
left the whole community and
14:32
I moved down to the
14:34
DC area, I thought, like,
14:36
how do I work with
14:38
people? And part of it
14:40
is, you know, the hands-on
14:42
work is really fun. It's
14:44
also highly licensed and all
14:47
that kind of stuff. I
14:49
thought, well, I work a
14:51
lot with people through mindfulness
14:53
and through meditation. Well, here's
14:55
focusing, which is perhaps even
14:57
the most subtle form of
14:59
this kind of work. As
15:02
you contrast it to sort
15:04
of like the gross manipulation
15:06
of tissue, as opposed to
15:08
how do we bring attention
15:10
to what's stagnant, what's stuck,
15:12
how do we work that?
15:14
And of course, that opens
15:17
up this endlessly fascinating world
15:19
of the power of inquiry
15:21
around. working with what's not
15:23
fully alive. Yeah, yeah, or
15:25
what's somehow asking for the
15:27
next step in life or
15:29
something. Exactly, exactly. Yeah, it's
15:31
like, where's the, you know,
15:34
where's the stress? Where's the
15:36
suffering? Or if we think
15:38
of the two wings of
15:40
mindfulness, you know, one wing
15:42
is a wing of wisdom,
15:44
you know, what is, what
15:46
is actually presenting right now?
15:49
What, what, what, what is
15:51
this, what is Can I
15:53
name it? And then, loving
15:55
awareness, how does this want?
15:57
to be with that? Which
15:59
are the two elemental questions
16:01
in focusing? Yeah, that's one
16:04
of the things I was
16:06
wondering when you were describing
16:08
the yoga practice, whether there
16:10
is that kind of gentle,
16:12
kind, loving sort of awareness
16:14
to the stuck places. Is
16:16
that a part of the
16:18
practice? We know what's so
16:21
interesting is in the span
16:23
of yoga, you've got in
16:25
any tradition. And this includes
16:27
both yoga and in meditation.
16:29
When I first heard this,
16:31
an author by the name
16:33
of Jason Siff, he wrote
16:36
a book called Unlearning meditation.
16:38
When I first heard this,
16:40
I thought, that's crazy. And
16:42
I thought, I thought, no,
16:44
it's true. He said, whatever
16:46
tradition you get trained in,
16:48
you can find another tradition
16:51
that will give you exactly
16:53
the opposite instructions. And
16:55
that's so, because in yoga,
16:57
you've got the intensely willful
16:59
practice, you know, where you're,
17:01
you know, just pushed through
17:04
the energy blocks. And then
17:06
you have traditions that are
17:08
all around surrender, you know,
17:10
and listening and softening and
17:12
flow. And my training was
17:14
more in kind of in
17:16
the flow realm of Krapalo
17:18
yoga. But the same thing
17:20
with meditation, you can do
17:22
like the sitings of strong
17:24
determination where you're developing, you
17:26
know, you're developing that intense
17:28
focus. And then there are
17:30
the traditions of just trust
17:32
the unfolding of what's there.
17:34
It reminds me of psychotherapy
17:36
because it certainly has all
17:38
of that spectrum as well.
17:40
But then it makes me
17:42
think of focusing. In the
17:44
focusing world, I wonder if
17:46
in some ways we also
17:48
have that spectrum. kind of
17:50
from boot camp focusing to,
17:52
you know, very gentle focusing.
17:54
Absolutely, but I think, and
17:56
again, this is just my,
17:59
my perspective is what we're
18:01
really helping. to do is
18:03
to find their own authority.
18:05
You know, one of the
18:07
most powerful inquiries I can
18:09
offer someone in focusing when
18:11
we're in touch with the
18:13
felt sense. We have a
18:15
sense of what it is.
18:17
We can sense the tenfold
18:19
of it. We can sense
18:21
how old it is. Is
18:23
there a sense of how
18:25
this wants you to be
18:27
with it right now? Yeah.
18:29
And I love that question
18:31
because... When you pose that
18:33
question and you wait, the
18:35
most amazing things arise out
18:37
of that, which is really
18:39
coming from the individual's own
18:41
place of authority. Yeah, that
18:43
makes sense. Yeah, no, that
18:45
makes perfect sense to me.
18:47
Yeah, that in the focusing
18:49
practice, there is... There
18:53
is a tradition, but it's a
18:55
tradition that maybe has a slightly
18:57
different role than some other traditions
19:00
in that it's not a tradition
19:02
that can offer any sort of
19:04
external authority about how to practice.
19:07
It's only a tradition that points
19:09
you to your own authority to
19:11
discover what practice is right for
19:14
you. Exactly. It points to what
19:16
I think of as the pathless
19:19
path. Yeah. And in the path
19:21
of path, we really only have
19:23
two questions. What's happening right now?
19:26
How does it want me to
19:28
be with it? Like what's the
19:30
most important thing as I'm with
19:33
this right now? I'm not sure
19:35
there's anything else in any given
19:37
moment if we really segment out
19:40
our experience. Yeah, yeah, I mean
19:42
that definitely resonates for me. And
19:44
I think probably in the focusing
19:47
world there's... that tendency towards a
19:49
kind of resistance to authority and
19:52
perhaps a slight kind of anarchy
19:54
that is not in any way
19:56
chaotic. Yeah, yeah. And that's what
19:59
I love about, of course, about
20:01
Genlin and what I love about
20:03
the old-timers is, you know, I
20:06
think I've mentioned this to you
20:08
in an email. It's like, there's
20:10
a sense of anarchy that I
20:13
love because it really is around
20:15
individual awakening. There's no there's no
20:17
cookie cutter approach here at all.
20:20
Yeah, exactly. So I'm wondering from
20:22
your perspective, because you've had so
20:25
much experience in these other traditions,
20:27
what in your view could they
20:29
potentially offer to someone that has
20:32
a focusing practice? Well, I think
20:34
when we... When we kind of
20:36
look at the, let's just say
20:39
we look to the kind of
20:41
the Buddhist lens, yeah, and we
20:43
look through these, the two wings
20:46
of wisdom and compassion, you know,
20:48
wisdom being, recognizing what's true, not
20:50
your preference, not your embellishment, but
20:53
what's true, and then really exploring
20:55
how to hold it, you know,
20:58
how does this want me to
21:00
be with it? The one model,
21:02
which you may be familiar with,
21:05
is the model, it's called a
21:07
rain model, R-A-A-I-N-N, R-I-I-N, R-I-I-I-N, Which
21:09
is a really wonderful synergy with
21:12
focusing. This was created by Michelle
21:14
McDonald originally and my wife Tara
21:16
Brock kind of reworked it. She
21:19
has a book out on this.
21:21
And the rain model is very
21:23
powerful. The R is to recognize
21:26
or realize what's presenting. The A
21:28
is to ask yourself, can I
21:30
allow it? Can I accept it?
21:33
The eyes to investigate. And then
21:35
there's sort of two versions of
21:38
rain. The N initially was to,
21:40
was around. not identifying and then
21:42
Tara kind of reworked it and
21:45
actually nurture which is like calling
21:47
on, calling on loving presence and
21:49
kind of ties also into domain
21:52
focusing which I which I studied
21:54
with with Robert Lee. But I
21:56
find like the questions, you know,
21:59
the inquiries that arise, you know,
22:01
to recognize like what is this,
22:03
you know, like that just that
22:06
sense of like what is this,
22:08
like what is this, like what
22:11
is this, like, like what is
22:13
this, like, like what is this,
22:15
like, like what is this, like
22:18
what is this, like, like, like,
22:20
And then, can you be with
22:22
it? And here, always, I just
22:25
encourage people, like, that's a deeply
22:27
somatic inquiry. Can't be with it.
22:29
Is it okay? Listen for the
22:32
somatic response, because it may not
22:34
be the right, the right, there
22:36
might, may not be the right
22:39
time. You know, there are these
22:41
qualities in, sort of like through
22:44
the Buddhist lens of the factors
22:46
of awakening. You know, there's certain
22:48
factors of awakening that are kind
22:51
of required to be present. You
22:53
have to have access to non-judging
22:55
awareness. You know, you have to
22:58
have a quality of concentration to
23:00
actually stay present. You have to
23:02
have a quality of curiosity of
23:05
curiosity to kind of want to
23:07
know more. You have to have
23:09
a quality of what's called rapture,
23:12
which is like the joy of
23:14
discovery. You have to have a
23:16
quality of steadiness. You have to
23:19
got to have fire power. You
23:21
need energy. You need energy. And
23:24
so that question of can I
23:26
be with it? And it's a
23:28
very very simple question, but to
23:31
really recognize that you may not
23:33
have the fire power. You just
23:35
may not have physical energy to
23:38
be with it. You may not
23:40
have access to mindfulness. So if
23:42
you get that somatic response, I
23:45
can't be with it right now.
23:47
It's too much. It's that whole
23:49
idea of letting it know you
23:52
see it. Letting it know your
23:54
intention is to be with it.
23:57
That's another time when the conditions
23:59
are different. your intention is to
24:01
be present with it. And it's
24:04
such a powerful step that I
24:06
think it's overlooked by a lot
24:08
of people. We have this sense
24:11
of, I just need to muscle
24:13
through this. And I'm not sure
24:15
that's so skillful. Yeah, no, I
24:18
totally agree. Can I be with
24:20
this in such a way that
24:22
I don't violate it at all?
24:25
Yeah. Yeah. And I love the,
24:27
you know, the analogy of, you
24:30
know, the felt senses, the wild
24:32
animal at the edge of the
24:34
edge of the edge of the
24:37
edge of the woods, the woods,
24:39
the woods, you know. You can't
24:41
seduce it in, you can't chase
24:44
it, but you can let it
24:46
know you see it. And that's
24:48
such a delicate, delicate relationship. So
24:51
that's the A. And then the
24:53
I, of course, is to investigate.
24:55
And I think we know we
24:58
have a tendency, particularly in the
25:00
West, to like have it be
25:02
an intellectual investigation. When the investigation
25:05
here is deeply, deeply semantic. And
25:07
if there is an investigation around
25:10
thoughts and beliefs, it's so important
25:12
to connect the dots back to
25:14
the felt sense, of course. And
25:17
then, and then again, you know,
25:19
through the focusing model, you know,
25:21
when you have that, when you
25:24
really have that sense of what
25:26
this is and the tendrils and
25:28
all of that, what happens when
25:31
I bring loving presence to this?
25:33
You know, and all the all
25:35
the variations of the inquiries around
25:38
that. you know, how does this
25:40
want me to be with it
25:43
right now? If I were simply
25:45
to hold this in loving presence,
25:47
how does it move or shift
25:50
or change? So that rain model
25:52
I find to be incredibly, it's
25:54
an incredible handle for people to
25:57
deeply move into more semantic inquiry.
25:59
Yeah, very, very useful. I agree
26:01
with everything you've said and a
26:04
question that arises for me. which
26:06
is a question to myself as
26:08
much as to you or anyone
26:11
else, is just why do you
26:13
think it is that the body
26:16
needs these particular qualities? Why is
26:18
it not possible to coax or
26:20
coerce or push the body or
26:23
the felt sense forward? Why is
26:25
it these particular kind of non-invasive
26:27
yet carrying curiosity welcoming? Why are
26:30
those qualities? Why is that what
26:32
life response to? You know, I,
26:34
with one of the best lines
26:37
I've ever heard, I sat a
26:39
couple retreats with the teacher by
26:41
the name of Soakni Rampache, who
26:44
taught very much from the kind
26:46
of the Zochen, the non-dual tradition,
26:49
and he talked about compassion. And
26:51
he said, compassion is the lubrication
26:53
that allows us to let go
26:56
what we know we need to
26:58
let go of. And I love
27:00
that. I love that. There's another
27:03
quote I love from a teacher
27:05
of Emmanuel who said, that there's
27:07
not a heart in this world
27:10
that would not open instantly if
27:12
it did not feel safe enough.
27:14
And I feel like there's something
27:17
to be said for, you know,
27:19
the powering through, the muscling through,
27:21
the, you know, pushing, you know,
27:24
pushing edges and building resilience. And
27:26
there's a lot to be said
27:29
for exploring that sense of loving
27:31
presence, you know, of... of that
27:33
like deep and pathic listening, you
27:36
know, for so many people. And
27:38
again, it's a cliche, but most
27:40
cliches are true. There is an
27:43
element of spiritual reparenting here, you
27:45
know. Does that make sense? It
27:47
makes sense, but it's still, maybe
27:50
it's not a question. Maybe I'm
27:52
the only one that makes this
27:54
into a question, but I still
27:57
wonder. Why is compassion such a
27:59
powerful attitude or approach? environment for
28:02
the body or for the being
28:04
or for the person or for
28:06
life on the one hand and
28:09
then related to that
28:11
it's always surprised me
28:13
how even when someone
28:15
myself or anyone else
28:17
is really quite suffering
28:20
if with a focusing guide
28:22
or anyone else If you
28:25
can invite the person to
28:27
kind of take a step
28:30
back into that more compassionate
28:32
approach to themselves and give
28:35
the feeling some space and
28:37
just be open to it,
28:39
welcome it, all of that kind
28:41
of language, how often
28:44
it actually readily is
28:46
available? How is it that
28:48
it's almost as though? We
28:51
kind of make ourselves
28:54
small and self-preservation
28:56
that is always
28:58
there to open up to. I
29:00
mean, how do you understand
29:02
that? It's a really powerful
29:05
question, but I think
29:07
my question for you
29:09
is, what works for you? When
29:12
you find yourself small,
29:14
caught in
29:16
self-preservation, etc.
29:18
That's always what works
29:20
for me is immediately to
29:22
give myself space, but not
29:25
a kind of an objective
29:27
cold sort of clinical space,
29:29
but a space that is
29:32
welcoming, that has at least
29:34
some caring, that suddenly I'm
29:36
curious about myself as
29:39
a being again, that that
29:41
kind of space that
29:43
is totally non-critical, non-judgmental
29:47
that. Always my body expands
29:49
in response to that. Yeah,
29:51
so I'm right there with you.
29:54
And I think from the
29:56
lens of Buddhist psychology or
29:58
Buddhist philosophy that the That access
30:00
to heart space, that access
30:03
to compassion is a training. Yeah,
30:05
it's referred to as meta,
30:07
you know, cultivating loving kindness.
30:10
It's like this little sprout
30:12
that requires a greenhouse for
30:15
protection. You know, because we
30:17
are so trained out of it,
30:19
you know, from such an early
30:22
age, you know, that negativity bias
30:24
is so, so intense. So in
30:26
classic method training. Well, there are
30:29
different variations of it, but you
30:31
reflect on your benefactors, you know,
30:33
you just reflect on the people
30:36
who you know are on your
30:38
side, you know, and you just
30:40
stream attention toward that. And
30:42
again, you can do it intellectually,
30:45
but the real work is doing
30:47
it sematically, you know, so you
30:49
actually access, what is it like
30:51
to, when you think about people
30:53
who you know like you, who
30:55
the people who laugh at your
30:58
jokes, you know, like to really
31:00
reflect into that. And then to
31:02
explore what's easy. And that's where
31:04
you start with your pets, you
31:06
know, with plants, you know, and
31:08
then you start to, you just
31:10
stream attention. Again, it's moving
31:13
from the thought into the
31:15
end of the felt sense. when you
31:17
increase your capacity for it. And
31:19
remember I did a month-long retreat,
31:21
and the first week was on
31:23
benefactor and on self, and then
31:25
the next week was on focusing
31:28
on the easy people, and
31:30
then the next week was
31:32
finding a neutral person. You
31:34
just choose one person, you
31:36
don't have any antipathy tour,
31:38
but no great attraction. And
31:40
just... for 45 minutes every
31:42
day. You're wishing that person
31:44
well. You're wishing them ease.
31:46
And I chose our retreat
31:48
manager who struck me as
31:50
a kind but unremarkable person.
31:53
And so every day in
31:55
about day five of that
31:57
retreat, of that week, I'm
31:59
just. sitting and she walked into
32:01
the room and like my heart started
32:03
fluttering. I thought, oh my beloved
32:05
has arrived, which is immediately followed
32:07
by like, oh my God, am
32:09
I falling in love with the
32:11
retreat manager? No, but like what
32:14
we pay attention to gets bigger,
32:16
which is again back to the
32:18
yogic thing of like, oh I
32:20
actually, Prana follows chita, what you
32:22
focus on, a felt sense will
32:24
come with it if you entrain
32:26
yourself on it. And the final week
32:28
is on, is choosing the difficult
32:30
person. You know, and a story
32:32
I often tell is when I
32:35
had my interview with the teacher
32:37
that final week with someone who
32:39
really betrayed me, I said, well,
32:42
here's where I am in my
32:44
forgiveness practice. I have come to
32:46
realize I can completely forget this
32:48
person as long as I'm a
32:51
surety burns in hell for eternity.
32:53
Which was progress? Yes. Yeah.
32:55
And then later actually, just
32:57
a few days later, suddenly
33:00
I got the role reversal.
33:02
You know, I was able to
33:04
like, oh, this is what he
33:06
was needing that wasn't happening. This
33:08
is why he threw me under
33:10
the bus and just such an
33:13
incredible rush of insight and
33:15
forgiveness. So all this to say,
33:18
it's a training. You know, it's
33:20
really training ourselves to look
33:22
for the good. And, um... And we
33:24
each have our own path. And we
33:27
each have our own wiring. How
33:29
do we wire ourselves
33:31
to loving presence? It's
33:33
unique for every one
33:35
of us. Yeah. It's interesting.
33:37
You use the term training
33:40
and I would use the term
33:42
on learning. And yet I think
33:44
we're talking about exactly
33:46
the same thing. Yep.
33:48
Exactly. When I listen to
33:50
you, I think. It sounds to
33:52
me. in addition to everything else it
33:55
is, it sounds to me very
33:57
therapeutic. And it makes me wonder...
34:00
Does psychotherapy
34:02
add anything else
34:04
to what it is
34:07
that you're talking
34:09
about? It's a
34:11
really good question.
34:13
You know, for me,
34:16
because my meditation
34:19
practice is
34:21
so central. No.
34:24
It really is
34:26
around awakening. you know,
34:28
whatever you want to call that,
34:30
you know, awakening to true nature,
34:33
awakening to who I am beyond
34:35
a separate self. And I had
34:37
a really interesting conversation with Dr.
34:40
Jenlin way, way, way back when,
34:42
when I was doing my training, one
34:44
of the conferences, and I noted
34:46
how in doing my partnerships
34:48
and so forth, how so
34:50
many people who get trained
34:52
in focusing are psychologically oriented,
34:54
you know, and... And usually you're,
34:56
you know, what I would find
34:58
is when in my partnerships that people
35:01
would have some issue, you know, some
35:03
emotional issue. And as we would move
35:05
into the felt sensing and naming
35:07
and so forth and kind of
35:09
following that model, there'd be some kind
35:11
of a shift. And then as soon as
35:14
there's some kind of shift, it'd be like,
35:16
okay, well, what else can I focus on?
35:18
And I noticed for myself, and this
35:20
was my question to Jenlin, like, like,
35:23
isn't the shift? something
35:25
we should really pay attention
35:28
to because isn't that shift
35:30
a shift in identity?
35:32
Like what happened? Like when
35:35
that issue dissolves along
35:37
with the, along with the
35:39
felt shift, what is that?
35:41
And it was really fun. We
35:43
had a great exchange around
35:46
it and then he kind of
35:48
like guided it back to, you
35:50
know, back to the psychological. But
35:53
I find it's sort of like,
35:55
I'm really kind of sharing your
35:57
question, like what is the difference?
35:59
You know, because when I look
36:01
at the model of rain, you
36:03
know, back to here's what's presenting,
36:06
you know, whether it be of
36:08
physical pain or emotional turmoil or
36:10
mental agitation, you know, you track
36:13
it back to the felt sense,
36:15
you sense, can I be with
36:17
it? And you move into
36:20
that into that investigation.
36:22
I'm not sure there's a difference.
36:24
Yeah, I, I'm at that point as
36:27
well. I keep asking myself
36:29
really. What is the difference?
36:31
What is it, especially if
36:33
you're focusing oriented therapist of
36:36
some kind? What are we offering,
36:38
I guess calling myself one of
36:40
them, what are we offering
36:42
that really is substantially different
36:44
or in any way more
36:46
than what you're describing? And I'm
36:48
not sure. I'm not sure if, apart
36:50
from a regular meeting and the
36:53
relationship that grows from that, but
36:55
otherwise. I'm not too sure, but
36:57
I want to go back to
36:59
what you just said. That's more
37:02
interesting to me is I could imagine
37:04
gentlemen liking the question. And
37:06
I think what you're saying, this is I
37:08
want to say it back to you to
37:10
see if I've got it, is I think
37:13
what you're saying is that you have
37:15
noticed, at least at that time, and
37:17
I would agree if this is what
37:19
you're saying, that in the partnerships, the
37:21
person that's focusing is almost looking
37:24
for What is the psychological trouble
37:26
that I'm dealing with in my
37:28
life at the moment? And finding
37:31
a way to be with that,
37:33
potentially getting some kind of shift
37:35
in their understanding, and then immediately
37:37
looking for, okay, what else is
37:39
here? Or, okay, so what's it
37:41
like now? And kind of following
37:44
the, following the path of the trouble.
37:46
And I think what you're suggesting is,
37:48
hold on a second. Something
37:50
quite profound just happened
37:52
there. Stay longer with that
37:54
shift, you know, and who are
37:57
you now and welcome just
37:59
that. shift and stay with
38:01
that before you start looking
38:03
for any more trouble. Yes,
38:05
it's around can we sustain
38:07
attention on that sort of
38:09
like dissolution of the small
38:12
self? Yes. And open to
38:14
the sense of what's left,
38:16
you know, the awareness itself,
38:18
you know, in the model
38:20
of rain, you know, my
38:22
wife talks about after the
38:24
rain, which is just after
38:26
you've done the inquiry. Slow
38:28
down, check out that space.
38:30
Yeah. Like a question that
38:32
I love, an inquiry, I
38:34
love to work with people
38:36
is when they're aware of
38:38
a pattern, you know, and
38:40
they sense the tendrils of
38:43
that pattern. And I ask,
38:45
who are you without that
38:47
imprint? Wow. Yeah. It's so,
38:49
so powerful. Yeah. Or if
38:51
you're investigating a belief, you
38:53
know, and if you follow
38:55
the model of Byron Katie,
38:57
you know. You know, you
38:59
find a belief that's really
39:01
core. You ask yourself, is
39:03
it true? You know, and
39:05
then is it really true?
39:07
Because the first response is,
39:09
of course, because I believe
39:11
it. And then what's it
39:13
like when you think that
39:16
thought? And in that model,
39:18
so many people hang out
39:20
intellectually. You know, well, here's
39:22
how I view it. But
39:24
if you move from the
39:26
conceptual into the felt sense.
39:28
Like, how does that believe
39:30
live in your nervous system?
39:32
Yeah. You know, when you
39:34
sense how old it is,
39:36
when you sense the tendrils
39:38
of how that, how that
39:40
lives inside, and then you
39:42
throw, then you pull out
39:44
the samurai sword, when there's
39:46
that real sense of this,
39:49
this is how it lives
39:51
on the inside, and you
39:53
ask, who are you without
39:55
that thought? It's just stunning.
39:57
And the question is, like,
39:59
yeah. Yeah. And we bear
40:01
hanging out in that space.
40:03
Yeah. Yeah. Some people. Can't
40:05
yeah, I've literally had people
40:07
fall out of their chair
40:09
on that question And some
40:11
people Will have some capacity
40:13
to hang out there in
40:15
That just that quality of
40:17
presence, you know, where where
40:20
a construct is no longer
40:22
and no longer has any
40:24
ground and how no longer
40:26
has any roots. It's so
40:28
exciting So that's an invitation
40:30
to an experience of self
40:32
that is no longer constricted
40:34
by that identity or belief
40:36
or whatever. An invitation for
40:38
the larger self, whatever you
40:40
want to call that. Yeah,
40:42
well, and you can call
40:44
it anything you want. Yeah,
40:46
exactly. I really like that,
40:48
and I think in the
40:50
focusing world, what you've said
40:53
about it is exactly how
40:55
I would also see it.
40:57
often enough, have a practice
40:59
of, I think, two things.
41:01
One, staying with the body
41:03
that actually isn't in a
41:05
state of trouble and allowing
41:07
it to expand. And then
41:09
it becomes, I think, a
41:11
little bit closer to the
41:13
spiritual practices you're describing. And
41:15
the other opportunity maybe to
41:17
do that is to stay
41:19
with a felt sense that's
41:21
positive, something that feels good
41:23
and to invite more and
41:26
more of it. Exactly. Yes.
41:28
To get more familiar with
41:30
kind of this unbound quality
41:32
of consciousness. Yeah, exactly. Yeah.
41:34
You know, and so I
41:36
think there's some beautiful tools
41:38
that at least have occurred
41:40
to me in my own
41:42
practice of like helping people
41:44
access their own sense of
41:46
wisdom. You know, quite often,
41:48
you know, at the end
41:50
of like a process to
41:52
ask. What advice do you
41:54
have to give yourself? You
41:57
know, which is just a
41:59
very simple way of kind
42:01
of tuning in to wisdom,
42:03
if you will. Or, you
42:05
know, given all that you've
42:07
felt and named, everything that
42:09
shift and moved, what's the
42:11
most important thing in your
42:13
life right now? And then
42:15
again, that sense of like
42:17
listening and waiting can be
42:19
so, so, so powerful. But
42:21
I think a lot of
42:23
it is, again, when we
42:25
put it back in the
42:27
context of... spiritual practice, if
42:30
you will. I'm just reminded
42:32
how in the Zogchen tradition,
42:34
which is kind of the
42:36
non-dual tradition, there's a sutra
42:38
which is considered like the
42:40
flower, like if you distill
42:42
it all down in the
42:44
Zog tradition, all comes down
42:46
to these lines, utterly awake,
42:48
since doors wide open, utterly
42:50
open, non-fix, non-fixating awareness, non-fixating
42:52
awareness, non-fixating awareness, non-fixating awareness,
42:54
non-fix fixating awareness, non-fixating, non-fixating
42:56
fixating awareness-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix- It's
43:00
so powerful because it's about
43:03
opening, opening deeply, since doors
43:05
wide open, and cultivating that
43:08
sense of non-fixating awareness or
43:10
presence. And I think part
43:13
of the focusing experiences were,
43:15
we're getting tiny glimpses or
43:18
big glimpses as we move
43:20
into this kind of inquiry.
43:23
Yeah, I love that. It
43:25
makes me think of two
43:28
different things. One is. that
43:31
if we if we think
43:33
of the focusing practice as
43:36
this gradual expanding or unfolding
43:38
or blossoming or something so
43:40
that the we're guided by
43:43
increasing openness that somehow that
43:45
is the guide that feels
43:48
right to me. Yeah. this
43:50
lens of Buddhist psychology of
43:52
what's called verified faith. You
43:55
know, and verified faith is,
43:57
is where it's not, the
44:00
opposite of verified faith is
44:02
magical thinking. You know, I'll
44:04
just think happy thoughts and
44:07
I'll be happy. But verified
44:09
faith is when you move
44:12
into that openness and you
44:14
realize that when you are
44:16
open and when you are
44:19
curious and when you can
44:21
access loving presence that there's
44:24
a power and a potency
44:26
is that you become you
44:28
have more and more of
44:31
a verified sense of this
44:33
is this is a journey
44:35
this is a technique this
44:38
is a process that that
44:40
works because it's worked before
44:43
and I think that's part
44:45
of like the you know
44:47
what growing our prefrontal cortex
44:50
and all that all that
44:52
stuff that happens but but
44:55
just that sense of like
44:57
a deepening sense of trust
44:59
in and how this process
45:02
of unfolding or awakening happens.
45:04
Yes it also reminds me
45:07
of the the first step
45:09
as Jen then first conceived
45:11
of it of clearing a
45:14
space. and how that
45:16
sometimes, and I know in
45:18
my own practice when I
45:20
have started with clearing a
45:22
space, often I don't go
45:24
on and focus. None of
45:26
those things seem very important
45:28
anymore. The cleared space was
45:30
the answer somehow. Yeah, yeah,
45:32
yeah. Yeah, what's between you
45:34
and feeling free is a
45:36
really powerful co-an. Yeah, you
45:38
know, because you have to
45:40
actually tune in to what
45:42
freedom is. Exactly. Yeah. Would
45:44
you see focusing as a
45:46
non-dual practice? I think it
45:48
has the possibility. I really
45:50
think it does. You know,
45:52
I think there's a tendency
45:54
to think that non- non-dual
45:56
means you're divorced from your
45:58
body, you know, that it's
46:00
just pure, it's just pure
46:02
awareness without a body. When
46:04
I, and when I go
46:06
back to that Zogjansutra, which
46:08
has been around for, you
46:10
know, a couple thousand years,
46:12
it's actually about awakened, awakened
46:14
in the felt sense. And
46:16
if you look at it
46:18
through the yoga perspective, you
46:20
know, it's the, it's the
46:22
purified. Like there's a quality
46:24
of purification. You know, yoga
46:26
talks about krias. You know,
46:29
and krias are the purification
46:31
experience. It's what you call
46:33
distressing. You know, when you're
46:35
doing, when you're working with
46:37
the gross sensations in the
46:39
body, and you come in
46:41
contact with like a really
46:43
deep tension, and you breathe
46:45
into it, and you kind
46:47
of ride the wave of
46:49
that energy, and you feel
46:51
like shift and move, that's
46:53
a kria. You know, you
46:55
just let go of something
46:57
out of something out of
46:59
your nervous system, out of
47:01
your nervous system. And I
47:03
think in many ways, this
47:05
is just a continued refined
47:07
process, which is like embodied
47:09
wakefulness. Does that make sense?
47:11
Yeah, it does make, well,
47:13
it certainly makes intuitive sense.
47:15
I listen to you. My
47:17
body agrees. I'm slower, but
47:19
my body agrees. It makes
47:21
me curious about your... The
47:23
way that, I mean, I
47:25
don't even know exactly how
47:27
to ask this question, but
47:29
what somehow the way that
47:31
you would bring focusing into
47:33
meditation potentially or the way
47:35
that you would in your
47:37
focusing practice emphasize particular things
47:39
such that your meditation experience
47:41
comes into it. How do
47:43
they somehow go together for
47:45
you? If we think of
47:47
mindfulness. That's non-judging awareness. Yeah.
47:49
That's the definition that works
47:51
for me, you know, non-judging
47:53
awareness. And back to the
47:55
Ashan days, my guru's guru
47:57
said, before he went back
47:59
to India at the end
48:01
of his life to die,
48:03
he was asked, what's the
48:05
highest quality of a spiritual
48:07
seeker? I thought for sure
48:09
he was going to say,
48:11
whatever you're enjoying, stop it,
48:13
you know, work harder, you
48:15
know, knuckle down. But he
48:17
said the highest quality of
48:19
a seeker is self-obervation without
48:21
judgment. Wow, we could try
48:23
that on. It's really, really
48:25
quite potent. Yes. And so
48:27
I think when we're in
48:29
a, we're in a, in
48:31
like a meditative experience, you
48:33
know, we sort of have
48:35
the gross sensations, you know,
48:37
and then we have all
48:39
the subtle stuff going on.
48:41
But as I like to
48:43
say, you know, when you
48:45
meditate, you feel better. You
48:47
know, you feel your depression
48:49
better, you feel your sadness
48:51
better, you feel your anger
48:53
better. It's all there ripe
48:55
for awareness. And there's some
48:57
meditative techniques that are about
48:59
just focus on concentration, you
49:01
know, do not indulge, you
49:03
know. But then, you know,
49:05
and there's a lot to
49:07
be said for like the
49:09
calming practices, the concentration practices,
49:11
but what I like about
49:13
vapassa in particular is when
49:15
something arises that's persistent that's
49:17
persistent. something that you intuitively
49:19
feel is calling for investigation.
49:21
You move from your anchor,
49:24
you know, a breath or
49:26
sound or whatever it may
49:28
be to focus on the
49:30
phenomena itself. And that's where
49:32
the rain practice comes in.
49:34
Okay, let me get familiar
49:36
with this. You may be
49:38
familiar with the, you know,
49:40
the old story of the
49:42
yogini in her cave. And
49:44
she's just meditating and these
49:46
three demons come into her
49:48
cave and they're... whirling around
49:50
and making all this noise
49:52
and very calmly she gets
49:54
up she starts building a
49:56
little fire and she's so
49:58
non-re The demons, and they
50:00
get really annoyed, so they
50:02
crank it up, you know.
50:04
Horrible sounds and images, and
50:06
again, it's so non-reactive, she
50:08
puts a teacettle on the
50:10
fire, and this enrages them,
50:12
so they throw everything they
50:14
got at her. And she
50:16
sets out these teacups, and
50:18
finally they say, what gives?
50:20
Where were your three deepest
50:22
wounds, your three worst nightmares?
50:24
And here you are building
50:26
this fire, and putting out
50:28
these teacups, and... What's going
50:30
on? And she says, well,
50:32
you've been here before and
50:34
you'll be here again. So
50:36
in the meantime, what kind
50:38
of tea would you like?
50:40
That's the practice. It's how
50:42
do we have tea with
50:44
our demons when they arise?
50:46
Yeah. So that's where I
50:48
think this model of investigation,
50:50
you know, we can apply
50:52
it on so many levels,
50:54
you know, I always love
50:56
this model of. At
50:58
the core is what we could call
51:00
Prana. You know, it's undifferentiated energy. And
51:03
then that gets experience of pleasant, unpleasant,
51:05
or neutral. That kicks in thought forms.
51:07
If you think the same thought a
51:10
thousand times, it calcifies into a belief.
51:12
If you're not aware of the beliefs
51:14
in your life, they form your habits.
51:17
If you're not aware of your habits,
51:19
they form your character, and if you're
51:21
not aware of your character structure, that's
51:24
your destiny. And we can explore and
51:26
investigate on any one of those levels.
51:28
You know, we can look at our
51:31
habits, we can look at our beliefs,
51:33
but fundamentally it brings us back to
51:35
how does this live on the inside,
51:38
you know, can I, can I work
51:40
with it energetically, you know, and catch
51:42
it kind of before it proliferates. So
51:45
is this sort of a daily life
51:47
practice for you as you go through
51:49
your day? Do you have a way
51:52
of kind of bringing yourself back, checking
51:54
in with you or checking in with
51:56
you? For
51:59
me. particularly with the state
52:01
of the planet and the
52:03
state of politics. You know,
52:05
I had a pretty big
52:07
realization. I need to be
52:09
more plugged in the presence
52:11
than I ever have just
52:13
with all the challenges here.
52:16
So I've upped my daily
52:18
sitting pretty, pretty, dramatically. And
52:20
it, boy, does it make
52:22
a difference. You know, it
52:24
so makes a difference. And
52:26
again, within the context of
52:28
my practice, there. their practices
52:30
within practices, you know, the
52:33
practices of arriving, you know,
52:35
of concentration, you know, and
52:37
then the practices of actively
52:39
investigating something that might be
52:41
coming up and the practices
52:43
of just surrender and resting
52:45
and presence. But what I
52:48
was so what's so core
52:50
and foundational to me is
52:52
the experience I've had in
52:54
focusing, you know, which is
52:56
Can I work with the
52:58
gross challenges when they arise?
53:00
But also, and this is
53:02
where it gets really interesting
53:05
for me, is when I'm
53:07
beginning to open into expansive
53:09
states, can I stay present
53:11
to them? And that's where
53:13
I find the practice gets
53:15
so subtle and so refined.
53:17
Like there's a question I
53:19
ask myself sometimes, depending on
53:22
my state. toward the end,
53:24
I like to ask myself,
53:26
who am I in the
53:28
absence of desire? This, that
53:30
question kind of like, really
53:32
kind of sets the stage
53:34
for sensing just pure, pure
53:36
presence. What helps me sustain
53:39
that awareness is, is opening
53:41
to the felt sense. Mm-hmm.
53:43
Like the, like the felt
53:45
sense of expansion, you know,
53:47
the felt sense, you know,
53:49
the felt sense, you know,
53:51
the felt sense, you know,
53:53
the felt sense, you know,
53:56
the felt sense of, you
53:58
know, of spaciousness. It's all
54:00
integral but on a very
54:02
subtle level. at least in
54:04
my experience. Can I ask
54:06
through your practice? What understanding
54:08
have you come to about
54:11
what a human being is,
54:13
what existence is? Have you
54:15
found any way of understanding
54:17
that really rings true when
54:19
you're really open in the
54:21
way you've been describing that
54:23
that really rings true when
54:25
you're open in the way
54:28
you've been describing? Wow,
54:30
that is such a powerful
54:33
question. It's, it's challenging to
54:35
find, to find words for
54:37
that. Um, I do think,
54:39
again, this is a stumbling
54:41
quality of, uh, approach here
54:44
is, um, it's kind of
54:46
back to that inquiry of
54:48
who am I in the
54:50
absence of desire. Yeah, it's
54:52
like that. It just points
54:55
toward that quality of of
54:57
spacious, spacious presence. And what
54:59
I kind of notice for
55:01
myself is the more I
55:03
immerse myself in that, the
55:06
more it kind of touches
55:08
into everything. The less I
55:10
believe my thoughts. The more
55:12
I'm aware of these kind
55:14
of unconscious beliefs that kick
55:17
in without even being aware
55:19
of it. You know, the
55:21
more I'm aware of Vedina,
55:23
you know, of that feeling
55:25
tone, you know, the more
55:28
aware I am of the
55:30
unconscious pushing away or grasping.
55:32
It's sort of like that
55:34
whole idea, you know, in
55:36
the analogy of when you
55:39
think of indigenous tribes who
55:41
like use indigo dye, you
55:43
know, you've got this bipod
55:45
of... an intense blue and
55:47
you dip in the white
55:50
fabric and you pull it
55:52
out, you hang it up
55:54
to dry and it dry.
55:56
almost bone white but a
55:58
little bit of the blue
56:00
you know and then you
56:03
dip it again and depending
56:05
on how how much you
56:07
dip it it takes on
56:09
it takes on the hue
56:11
of the dye and I
56:14
think in many ways it's
56:16
the same thing you know
56:18
like wherever we point our
56:20
attention we tend to take
56:22
on the qualities of that
56:25
wherever we reside wherever our
56:27
attention resides. Which is why
56:29
I find it so powerful,
56:31
and I imagine you do
56:33
too, the more I immerse
56:36
myself into practice, but also
56:38
the more I'm in this
56:40
relational field of supporting people
56:42
in this inquiry, the more
56:44
it sort of permeates my,
56:47
you know, who I am,
56:49
at least right now. Do
56:51
you find that to be
56:53
true? Yeah, I do. But
56:55
I think for me, it's...
56:58
moments on my own, either
57:00
when I am purposely investigating,
57:02
with that question, you know,
57:04
once I'm in touch with
57:06
the more expansive body, that
57:09
question of, um, either, well,
57:11
every time I have to
57:13
find the right way of
57:15
phrasing it, but something like,
57:17
what is this? or what
57:20
am I? And then noticing
57:22
that even asking the question
57:24
somehow is too small for
57:26
the inquiry, the only other
57:28
time is usually when I'm
57:31
on my own, I actually
57:33
find it more difficult when
57:35
I'm with other people unless
57:37
we're in a focusing practice
57:39
or meditative kind of shared
57:42
space. But like in conversation
57:44
or something with other people,
57:46
I can find it difficult
57:48
to keep the openness in
57:50
myself. I'm curious,
57:53
when you're working with someone
57:55
and they, they experience a
57:57
felt shift and part of
57:59
that felt shift. is into
58:02
a sense of like non-identification,
58:04
a sense of expansiveness, you
58:06
know. How do you help
58:08
them sustain attention on that?
58:10
If I'm working with the
58:13
client I would simply say
58:15
let's not move on from
58:17
this, let's just stay with
58:19
this, let's welcome it, let
58:22
your body fully have this,
58:24
let it move and expand
58:26
as much as it wants
58:28
to, and let's just see
58:30
if it's okay simply to
58:33
allow that. I would say
58:35
that kind of thing over
58:37
and over again. That's awesome.
58:39
That's great. You know, whatever
58:42
I lead, a meditation, you
58:44
know, I will always point
58:46
toward resting and presence. So
58:48
many of us, we need
58:50
the, you know, we need
58:53
the practice of gathering and
58:55
arriving, you know, we need
58:57
the practice of conscious relaxation.
58:59
We need the practice of
59:01
being the witness of what's
59:04
changing. But all roads ultimately
59:06
point toward resting and presence.
59:08
And I think it's kind
59:10
of the same in a
59:13
focusing session. You know, is
59:15
that when there are those
59:17
moments where there just is
59:19
that sense of presence that
59:21
emerges where the small self
59:24
gets more permeable or drops
59:26
away, to get familiar with
59:28
that is just so juicy.
59:30
Yeah, I agree. It doesn't
59:33
happen all that often in
59:35
my experience, but when it
59:37
does, I certainly slow down
59:39
and really encourage welcoming it.
59:41
But how about when you're
59:44
in a conversation with other
59:46
people, not necessarily a difficult
59:48
conversation where, you know, you
59:50
violently disagree about something, but
59:52
just ordinary conversation, do you
59:55
have a way? Because of
59:57
all the practice that you've
59:59
done, do you have a
1:00:01
way of kind of gently
1:00:04
bringing yourself back to that
1:00:06
state of presence. So you
1:00:08
don't get too pulled into
1:00:10
a conversation, for example, or
1:00:12
a particular discussion. That's a
1:00:15
while. That's such a great
1:00:17
question. You know, I think
1:00:19
when we look at the
1:00:21
Buddhist lens, one of the
1:00:24
things the Buddha allegedly said,
1:00:26
I mean, he knows what
1:00:28
he said, nothing was written
1:00:30
down for a couple hundred
1:00:32
years, but he, you know,
1:00:35
one of the things pretty
1:00:37
emphatic about, he said nothing
1:00:39
is to be clung to
1:00:41
his eye or mine. Nothing
1:00:43
whatsoever is to be clung
1:00:46
to his eye or mine.
1:00:48
And when we have those
1:00:50
moments when I or mine
1:00:52
either becomes permeable or drops
1:00:55
away, those are the mystical
1:00:57
moments. And so I kind
1:00:59
of look for, again, in
1:01:01
very imperfect ways, ways that
1:01:03
I can allow myself to
1:01:06
become more permeable. Yes. And
1:01:08
one of the questions I
1:01:10
often will ask is, I
1:01:12
kind of... to tune myself
1:01:15
to the unmet need if
1:01:17
I'm in conversation to ask
1:01:19
myself, what is this person
1:01:21
needing right now? And that's
1:01:23
a really powerful way of
1:01:26
sort of like opening up
1:01:28
the field a little bit
1:01:30
more. Yeah. What I typically
1:01:32
do is if I'm at
1:01:34
a dinner table, for example,
1:01:37
is if I can feel
1:01:39
myself getting too narrow down
1:01:41
into something... is I expand
1:01:43
my awareness to the whole
1:01:46
table and almost kind of
1:01:48
invite myself to be the
1:01:50
whole situation, the whole setting,
1:01:52
rather than a separate self
1:01:54
within it. And even though
1:01:57
I can't completely accomplish that,
1:01:59
it does enough to broaden
1:02:01
my experience again. Let's see,
1:02:03
a group, that's what you're
1:02:06
doing. Yes. You are opening,
1:02:08
you're opening to the collective.
1:02:10
Yes. Opens up more possibility
1:02:12
and creativity and allowing you
1:02:14
to bring, to bring presence
1:02:17
to the group. Yes, I
1:02:19
do. I invite my body
1:02:21
to be the room rather
1:02:23
than myself. It's helpful for
1:02:25
me. Yeah. Yeah, that's. That's
1:02:30
juicy. I have one of
1:02:32
my favorite words. I'm just
1:02:34
aware of the time. I
1:02:37
want to ask. What are
1:02:39
you kind of most passionate
1:02:41
about at this point in
1:02:44
your life or what are
1:02:46
you developing or yeah anything
1:02:48
else that you would like
1:02:51
to add so people know
1:02:53
about it? Well, I have
1:02:55
a weekly talk that I
1:02:58
do and my My, um,
1:03:00
my, I like to think
1:03:02
of what I offer is,
1:03:05
is what pragmatic Darma, you
1:03:07
know, it's like, how do
1:03:09
we apply these ancient teachings
1:03:12
to the phone call you're
1:03:14
dreading next week, you know,
1:03:16
that's, that's a passion of
1:03:19
mine. But another project I'm
1:03:21
working on is something I've
1:03:23
been fascinated with, just through
1:03:26
my own life experience, and
1:03:28
the working title is transforming
1:03:30
your relationship to pain, kind
1:03:33
of a chronic pain companion.
1:03:35
And it's about 10 or
1:03:37
12 attentional strategies for working
1:03:40
with physical pain. And that's
1:03:42
just fascinating. Yeah. Just really.
1:03:44
There's so many options when
1:03:47
it comes to the experience
1:03:49
of pain that we don't,
1:03:51
that we forget because we
1:03:54
get so locked into fear
1:03:56
and self-preservation. So it's basically
1:03:58
offering. kind of like warm
1:04:01
guidance in your ear. to
1:04:03
explore some different ways of
1:04:05
working with it. And of
1:04:08
course, emotional pain is physical
1:04:10
pain. It can be applied,
1:04:12
you know, across the board.
1:04:15
But the primary thing is,
1:04:17
what do you, how do
1:04:19
you work at when, when
1:04:22
it feels like it's too
1:04:24
much, you know? Yeah, that
1:04:26
sounds incredibly useful. And that,
1:04:29
where could people find your
1:04:31
thinking about that? Well, I've
1:04:33
got a website and YouTube
1:04:36
channel, just my name. And
1:04:38
product, probably, I'm hoping it'll
1:04:40
be out in the next
1:04:43
couple months. Okay, perfect. Yeah.
1:04:45
Yeah, I'll put your website
1:04:47
so people can find you.
1:04:50
I have one more question.
1:04:52
Which? I'm happy to make
1:04:54
up an answer. Okay, terrific.
1:04:57
I'm thinking. especially when I
1:04:59
speak to people that live
1:05:01
in America. And I mean,
1:05:04
not only America, because the
1:05:06
whole world is suffering in
1:05:08
kind of new ways, it
1:05:11
feels like, although probably not
1:05:13
very new, but in America
1:05:15
where you've recently had this
1:05:18
election that again seemed to
1:05:20
really kind of divide the
1:05:22
nation. Do
1:05:25
you have ways or can
1:05:27
you think of ways or
1:05:29
are you interested in attempts
1:05:32
to bring some of the
1:05:34
things you've been talking about
1:05:36
whether it's things you've learned
1:05:39
from yoga or from Buddhism
1:05:41
or from focusing or just
1:05:43
the overall kind of attitude
1:05:45
that comes with these practices?
1:05:48
Are there ways of bringing
1:05:50
that to the nation? somehow
1:05:52
to the society, to groups,
1:05:55
to the community that you
1:05:57
think could be helpful at
1:05:59
this. point. That's such a such
1:06:02
a rich and deep question.
1:06:04
You know, I think it's
1:06:06
it's interesting to watch kind
1:06:08
of the reactivity in the
1:06:11
in this culture because right
1:06:13
now so many people are
1:06:15
burned out. You know, there's such
1:06:17
a sense of a hopelessness
1:06:20
and a sense of feeling
1:06:22
disempowered, you know, such a
1:06:24
sense of despair and a
1:06:26
lot of people are just
1:06:28
saying We just have to
1:06:31
wait and see, which is very
1:06:33
challenging, and I experienced
1:06:35
a lot of that myself, you
1:06:37
know. But I know for myself,
1:06:39
and part of mine is like,
1:06:41
again, back to those two questions
1:06:44
of what's happening, and how does
1:06:46
it just want me to be
1:06:48
with it? You know, for me,
1:06:50
it's around, I need to be
1:06:52
plugged in, you know. I want
1:06:55
my cup to be overflowing because
1:06:57
I know that when I respond
1:06:59
out of anger, I have a
1:07:02
certain degree of effectiveness in the
1:07:04
world. If I can respond
1:07:06
with compassion, it's a different
1:07:08
degree of effectiveness
1:07:10
in the world, you know. And I
1:07:13
think part of it, you know, kind
1:07:15
of back to the old, sickness old
1:07:17
age and death, is really looking at,
1:07:19
you know, we each need to look
1:07:22
closely at our suffering. and
1:07:24
how to respond to it. And
1:07:26
I really do feel like we
1:07:28
are in a big unknown
1:07:30
in our culture right now.
1:07:33
I don't know how things will
1:07:35
coalesce. As someone
1:07:37
said, just from a
1:07:39
political point of view,
1:07:41
the question is, with
1:07:44
the new administration, will
1:07:46
they provide customer
1:07:48
satisfaction? And if
1:07:51
they don't, then... Something's
1:07:53
gonna shift again. And so
1:07:55
I'm not I'm not being
1:07:58
really articulate here. But
1:08:00
I think there is, I really
1:08:02
do feel there is a sense
1:08:05
of how do we be with
1:08:07
it and no one really knows
1:08:10
right now. Yeah. Yeah, what I'm
1:08:12
getting from what you're
1:08:15
saying partially at
1:08:17
least is as a
1:08:19
citizen to take it as
1:08:21
your responsibility
1:08:23
to some extent to
1:08:26
be adding... more awareness
1:08:28
rather than simply more
1:08:30
content. Yeah, yeah. And as
1:08:32
someone pointed out, you
1:08:35
know, to be curious, you
1:08:37
know, to be curious, what
1:08:39
can I learn? You know, what can
1:08:41
I learn? You know, what is, what
1:08:43
is, what is, you know, the
1:08:46
world is run by unmet needs,
1:08:48
you know, what are the unmet
1:08:50
needs? And how do we, how
1:08:52
do we, how do we attune to
1:08:55
that? Deep in
1:08:57
interesting times, you know,
1:08:59
yeah, yeah, and yeah, it's
1:09:01
yeah, it it it makes
1:09:03
me subtly excited when you
1:09:06
say it that way We know
1:09:08
when when people ask me
1:09:10
how's your how's your
1:09:13
business? My classic response
1:09:15
is I said well,
1:09:17
I'm in the suffering
1:09:19
industry, you know, business
1:09:21
is booming, you know
1:09:24
And you know, we wake up out
1:09:26
of suffering if we really, if we
1:09:29
really look at it. And I
1:09:31
think part of, you know, I
1:09:33
just notice how, you know, you
1:09:36
know how, I particularly noticed among
1:09:38
folks who have like chronic issues
1:09:40
they don't address. And as they
1:09:42
get old and older, they become
1:09:45
almost cartoon characters. You know, in
1:09:47
many ways, you know, like the
1:09:49
suffering that's emerging is so chronic
1:09:52
we can't miss it now. And
1:09:54
it will get our
1:09:56
attention, you know, at
1:09:58
some point. And the
1:10:01
question is, can
1:10:03
we respond
1:10:05
to it? Yeah. Yeah.
1:10:07
That's a really interesting
1:10:11
reminder of
1:10:13
what to watch out
1:10:15
for in one's aging.
1:10:18
Yeah. Okay, thank
1:10:20
you very much. I've really enjoyed
1:10:22
talking with you and I'm really
1:10:24
glad. This has been great. Thank
1:10:26
you so much. I so appreciate
1:10:28
you and all that you do
1:10:30
and all that you offer and
1:10:32
what a great resource that you
1:10:34
are. Likewise. And yeah, I want
1:10:36
to make sure that people can get
1:10:39
in contact with you. Great.
1:10:41
Thank you very much. Thank you.
1:10:43
Thanks so much. Take care. Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More